Slashdot Mirror


Feds Charge 61 People In Indian-Based IRS Phone Scam Case (consumerist.com)

BUL2294 writes: Following the arrests earlier this month in India of call center employees posing as IRS or immigration agents, USA Today and Consumerist are reporting that the U.S. Department of Justice has charged 61 people in the U.S. and India of facilitating the scam, bilking millions from Americans thinking they were facing immediate arrest and prosecution. "According to the indictment (PDF) -- which covers 20 individuals in the U.S. and 32 people and five call centers in India -- since about 2012 the defendants used information obtained from data brokers and other sources to call potential victims impersonating officers from the IRS or U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services," reports Consumerist. The report adds: "To give the calls an air of authenticity, the organization was able to 'spoof' phone numbers, making the calls appear to have really come from a federal agency. The callers would then allegedly threaten potential victims with arrest, imprisonment, fines, or deportation if they did not pay supposed taxes or penalties to the government. In instances when the victims agreed to pay, the DOJ claims that the call centers would instruct them to go to banks or ATMs to withdraw money, use the funds to purchase prepaid stored value cards from retail stores, and then provide the unique serial number to the caller. At this point, the operations U.S.-based counterparts would use the serial numbers to transfer the funds to prepaid reloadable cards. The cards would then be used to purchase money orders that were transferred into U.S. bank accounts of individuals or businesses. To make matters worse, the indictment claims that the prepaid debit cards were often registered using personal information of thousands of identity theft victims, and the wire transfers were directed by the organizations using fake names and fraudulent identifications. The operation would then use 'hawalas' -- a system in which money is transferred internationally outside of the formal banking system -- to direct the pilfered funds to accounts belonging to U.S.-based individuals.

139 comments

  1. Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What makes them any less legitimate than the 'real' IRS? It's a scam either way.

    1. Re:Unwanted Competitor by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      They don't have the trigger-happy militarized police department behind them.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:Unwanted Competitor by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Too bad the police don't focus more on real crime. I received dozens of these IRS scam calls, all with thick Indian accents. Everyone I know received them as well. That means there were billions of calls being made. Yet, it took the feds years to do anything about it. And now they arrest 61 people. There is no way that all of those calls were placed by only 61 people.

    3. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this

    4. Re:Unwanted Competitor by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "REAL IRS" is a division of the U.S. government, and abides by the same rules of bureaucracy. Have you ever filed a form for your income tax in the United States? If you have, then you already know:

      - The U.S. government does not perform legal notifications over the phone. They will send you a letter via US Mail. Sometimes 2 or 3, just to make sure you got it.
      - The U.S. government knows you by your Tax ID number (or Social Security number). It's on every tax form you submit.
      - The U.S. government absolutely DOES NOT REQUIRE payment by GREEN DOT CREDIT CARDS! They will accept personal checks, cashiers checks, and even direct withdrawals.
      - The U.S. government doesn't use call centers in India for the IRS. The Internal Revenue Service is by definition "INTERNAL". There is absolutely no need to involve any other country in this aspect.

      This is how you tell a scammer from the REAL IRS. If the person calling you seems to think differently about any of the above, HANG UP. It's a scam.

    5. Re:Unwanted Competitor by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      HANG UP. It's a scam.

      NO!!! Do not hang up on scammers. You should string them along and then find an excuse to put them on hold. I usually tell them to wait while I go get my credit card. Their scams only work if they can quickly weed through reasonably intelligent people, to zero in on the idiots. If we all waste their time, even just a minute or two, the economics no longer work in their favor. So play along, act stupid, and trick them into waiting.

    6. Re:Unwanted Competitor by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      This latest batch, at least when they got your answering machine, involved bad computer voices (think xtranormal).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded as funny?

    8. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether it's the REAL IRS or not... It's still a scam.

    9. Re: Unwanted Competitor by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...and abides by the same rules of bureaucracy.

      Good God, man; they're even worse than I thought!

    10. Re:Unwanted Competitor by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Most of them were probably made by people in India being paid a token amount (who may not have even realised that they weren't working legitimately for the IRS). Those 61 probably represent the ones that actually made the money.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Unwanted Competitor by gsslay · · Score: 1

      It's your third point that would, you'd think, be the most telling. Governments generally do not collect taxes through prepaid stored value cards from retail stores. I'm sure these scammers can be very convincing, but the moment they ask victims to go buy some iTunes gift cards, does that not raise just the slightest suspicion?

    12. Re:Unwanted Competitor by TharMonk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most of them were probably made by people in India being paid a token amount (who may not have even realised that they weren't working legitimately for the IRS). Those 61 probably represent the ones that actually made the money.

      Actually, they understood that, perfectly. Your good scammers need to be intelligent to actually convince people to part with their money, and they need to know that they are running a scam, not actually representing a governmental agency in another country.

      After receiving 4 calls in one day from them, I started calling them back. They would ask for my name, and I would remind them that they called my number, and left messages insisting that I owed money to the IRS, so all they needed to do was look at my phone number, and tell me who I was and how much I owed. They would then hang up on me. After about a dozen attempts, they recognized my number, and once answered the phone with a "f*ck you" and immediately hung up. After the 20th time I called them back, in a row (yes, I was bored, and apparently there were 3 or 4 people answering calls on the number they were using at the time, so I started recognizing their voices,) I lied to them and told them that I had just called the IRS, who denied having anything to do with this, and who had directed me to the FBI, who would be calling them, shortly. In a rare moment of "fsck this" the scammer said "Yes sir, you are right, this is a scam. If you fell for it, we were going to get you to send us all of the money in your bank account." I was shocked by this, and also excited, because I was recording the call (I'm in Virginia, a 1 party consent state.) So I drew him out, and he explained to me that he wasn't worried about the law coming to get him, because "we have been doing this for years. They never catch us. They never going to catch us." He then asked me, politely, if I would please stop calling them. I told him to stop calling my number, if he didn't want to keep hearing from me, dozens of times for every call they made to me, and he agreed.

      They did call me back the next day (darned scammers, not keeping a good Do Not Call List,) but, after that, it was over a month before they put me back into the regular rotation.

      Yes, I still have the recording. I had plans to post it on youtube to shame the government into some kind of action, but, when I looked it up online, I found that this was so well known for so many years that it was clear that the scammer was essentially right... no one was coming for them.

      This news article made me smile. I kind of hoped they got the "they never going to catch us" guy.

    13. Re:Unwanted Competitor by tnok85 · · Score: 1

      Used to get those fake google business calls to my cell, and finally decided to do this. The guy had no foreign accent (sounded western US), and it didn't even change when he got angry. After ~5 minutes of bullshit, he asked me my company name. I asked him his. He asked me mine. Back and forth. Finally, he got a little pissed while asking, so I said "My company name is fuck you." He said "Thanks for wasting my time, expect a lot more calls!" and then he hung up. I didn't get any more calls.

    14. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      Not just scammers, but ANY telemarketer. And ESPECIALLY "Rachel from Card Services" Have fun with them. The infamous Tom Mabe telemarketer stunt is but a suggestion of how to proceed. In my younger days, a housemate strung out a "vinyl windows and doors" guy for over 30 minutes. Serious fun can be had, messing with telemarketers. . .

    15. Re:Unwanted Competitor by ghoul · · Score: 1

      A telemarketer is doing a job. Some people may actually benefit from being exposed to a new product. Dont lump them with scammers

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    16. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not just scammers, but ANY telemarketer. And ESPECIALLY "Rachel from Card Services" Have fun with them. The infamous Tom Mabe telemarketer stunt is but a suggestion of how to proceed. In my younger days, a housemate strung out a "vinyl windows and doors" guy for over 30 minutes. Serious fun can be had, messing with telemarketers. . .

      I just answer the phone, then as soon as I determine it's a scam / telemarketer, put the receiver down and walk away.
      Takes them at least 15 seconds to realize nobody's responding, and minimal effort on my part.

    17. Re:Unwanted Competitor by gordguide · · Score: 0

      A telemarketer is doing a job. Some people may actually benefit from being exposed to a new product. Dont lump them with scammers



      I'm sorry, but NO, there is no such thing as a legitimate Telemarketer, and not one single person in the history of the planet has ever "benefit[ed] from being exposed to a new product" over the phone

      I lump them in with scammers because they are scammers, regardless of whether they are technically legal or not. If they are so wonderful, why won't they tell a recipient their physical location? Because they know someone might just go there and perform some corrective justice. And normal, law-abiding people don't do that unless provoked.

      It's akin to a mobster claiming a puppet corporation setup by laundered money is "running a legitimate business here". Really? I think not.
    18. Re:Unwanted Competitor by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1, Troll

      A telemarketer is doing a job. Some people may actually benefit from being exposed to a new product. Dont lump them with scammers

      A kidnapper is doing a job. Some people may actually benefit from being forced to take a vacation. Dont lump them with real criminals.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    19. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telemarketing calls to cell phones are illegal. And I'm on the FTC "Do Not Call List", so my land line is off limits too. And yet, I get plenty of calls, 100% of which are illegal. Because of this, every sales pitch made to me by telephone is, by definition, a scam. Every single one.

      There is an interesting technical solution for landlines (if you have multiple ring). Nomorobo gives you a special number that you add as a concurrent ring for the number you are trying to protect. Whenever a call comes in, the service compares the caller ID info with their list of known tele-scammers. If there's a match, they auto-answer the call and drop it. When that happens, I hear a single ring, followed by ... nothing!

      Once in a while, a new telemarketer will get through because they are not in the database. If they make the mistake of calling me, I fix the problem by adding them on the nomorobo website. I keep them on the line just long enough to say, "Welcome to the blacklist!"

      My number is where telemarketing calls go to die.

    20. Re:Unwanted Competitor by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      What makes them any less legitimate than the 'real' IRS? It's a scam either way.

      For one these scammers can't throw you in jail if you don't pay.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    21. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Telemarketing calls to cell phones are illegal.

      How I wish this were the case in Sweden. Fortunately, the eniro.se app IDs most of them and they get added to the block list as soon as it stops ringing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    22. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      string them along and then find an excuse to put them on hold.

      Being on hold doesn't necessarily slow them; they are probably multi-tasking, doing multiple calls at once. If I pause to dig for info in a regular call, such as tech support for example, I can tell the operator works on another case.

    23. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      The guy had no foreign accent (sounded western US)

      Irony: East Indians learn US accents to get phone support jobs, and US citizens learn East Indian accents to get jobs from US companies expecting to only offer visa-worker wages or working conditions.

      "Do the needful"

    24. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time say "My number is 1-800-25-5324" (FBI for fraud)

    25. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I always like the ones who would call to offer me a vehicle warranty for my recently purchased vehicle. Those were fun as they started calling about 3 months after I bought my beater Jeep that at the time I got it had just over 350,000 miles on it and was a '96 or the '88 Bronco II with 250,000+ on it before that. I would string them along as they were offering a warranty on my most recently purchased vehicle. They would end up cursing me out for wasting their time when they found out just how old and how high of mileage that vehicle was. One insisted that it was for my other car after telling me the beater couldn't be covered but didn't like it when I mentioned that it was a '97 with 240,000 miles on it.

      When I get these calls at work on my work cell phoneI have my Indian coworkers tell them obscene things until they hang up.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    26. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a worthwhile operation might be an automated robo dialing of their numbers to keep their lines full.

    27. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What all you brilliant self-righteous folks don't seem to understand is that when someone receives such a phone call, IT SCARES THEM! It doesn't matter whether it's rational. Once people are scared, they become much less rational and able to analyze what is going on. As people age, they become much more susceptible to getting scared. Ever wonder why old people are so risk-averse?

      Meanwhile, to a few decimal places, 0% of the population knows what the IRS procedures are, or whether they might have changed them yesterday.

      The best advice is: do not answer your phone, unless you recognize the caller-id. Period. Screen every call.

      Unless you are getting paid to do it, stringing along scammers is a waste of your time. Trust me, your time is more valuable than theirs. Unless you are bored enough to do it for your own amusement. In which case, knock yourself out. Er, figuratively.

    28. Re:Unwanted Competitor by johnwfran · · Score: 1

      How much is _your_ time worth?

    29. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love calls from scammers or salespeople... I can draw them out for 20 minutes sometimes .

    30. Re:Unwanted Competitor by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Or, if you're really bored/creative/busy... Have Lenny talk to them.

    31. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I just answer the phone, then as soon as I determine it's a scam / telemarketer, put the receiver down and walk away.
      Takes them at least 15 seconds to realize nobody's responding, and minimal effort on my part.

      Same here, at least back when I had a landline and these calls were rife. I used to string them out, but then I realized I didn't want to waste my time wasting there's.

      Nowadays I don't answer my phone unless I recognize the number. If they legitimately need to talk to me they can leave a message.

    32. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you legally obligated to inform the authorities? Otherwise you're an accessory... right?

    33. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PLEASE post this to Youtube. This level of arrogance can help spur action.

    34. Re:Unwanted Competitor by moosehooey · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, you probably don't have to pay for calls you receive, like we do in the US.

    35. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know. Nobody in my immediate family uses a mobile, that being one of the reasons. I didn't get one before moving overseas, so I've never had to put up with that.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    36. Re:Unwanted Competitor by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us

      That should be 1-800-225-5324, AC missed a 2.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. How could you fall for this? by ZipK · · Score: 1
    Okay, spoofed phone numbers, threats, social engineering, but...

    ... the call centers would instruct them to go to banks or ATMs to withdraw money, use the funds to purchase prepaid stored value cards from retail stores, and then provide the unique serial number to the caller.

    1. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Old folks get scared and will do what they're told. As will non-tech-savy folk.

      The bigger question is, when the hell are the telcos going to be forced to fix the spoofing problem.

    2. Re:How could you fall for this? by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      Many people aren't very smart, and many people are terrified of the IRS or immigration officials. And it doesn't take very many people to fall for this - out of the millions they call - to make it worth the trouble for the bad guys.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:How could you fall for this? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      Yup. I couldn't believe back in the XP day when someone would call saying the FBI had "seized their computer" with a lock screen instructing the user to buy Green Dot cards and call a phone number to get their computer unlocked...
      I enjoyed telling the user that if the FBI seizes a computer, you are normally in the back of one of their cars at the time. Also, the FBI does not cut you loose for a bit of cash. And lastly, the lock screen was just Internet Explorer in kiosk mode...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    4. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One of the victims was a cancer survivor. Just goes to show how badly a serious illness can mess up the human mind. I, for one, feel badly for her and don't want to mock what happened to her.

      A related question comes to mind: why do Microsoft and Facebook want these folks to work for them so badly that they push for H1Bs to be handed out like candy? It just doesn't seem right.

    5. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck answers their phone any more from a number they don't recognize?

    6. Re:How could you fall for this? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The bigger question is, when the hell are the telcos going to be forced to fix the spoofing problem.

      When the public starts demanding it. This issue is too diffuse to matter in local politics, and national elections tend to focus on the personal behavior of the candidates rather than things that actually matter to the citizens.

    7. Re:How could you fall for this? by youngone · · Score: 1
      I'm not very smart and nearly fell for one of these scams a few years ago.

      The man said my wife owed money on a speeding fine (which sounded plausible) and it wasn't until he wanted my credit card details that I even thought about it.

      He then threated her with arrest, which I agreed was the best course of action, but about 15 years later, she has yet to be arrested.

    8. Re:How could you fall for this? by PRMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My dad sent $2500 to some scammers claiming to be the police with my cousin in jail. He couldn't believe me that he was being scammed, even though I said, "That's not how bail works! And even so, you think the police take bail in CVS cards?"

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re:How could you fall for this? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      they need to stop useing lowest bidder call centers.

    10. Re:How could you fall for this? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time mustering sympathy for those who fall for rather obvious scams, unless they have mental health issues, in which case why aren't they taken care of and protected? Falling for a scam like this might be a good indication that a person needs a guardian.

      That's not an excuse for the scammers, though - round them up, and put them in a cell with Sanford Wallace and Oleg Nikolaenko.

    11. Re:How could you fall for this? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck answers their phone any more from a number they don't recognize?

      1. People that run a business.
      2. People that have dumb kids who forget to take (or charge) their own cellphones.
      3. Old people.

      I fall into all three categories.
      If my phone rings, I answer it.
      Also, dealing with calls as they happen is more efficient than sifting through voice mail later.

    12. Re:How could you fall for this? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      unless they have mental health issues, in which case why aren't they taken care of and protected?

      Mental health is not a binary condition, where you either have it or you don't. It is a spectrum, and nearly everyone suffers from some form of mental health issue at some point in their lives, including depression, autism, ADHD, dementia, etc. If all these people are "taken care of" and "protected" all of the time, we will be spending 120% of our GDP on health care.

      The best way to protect the vulnerable is to arrest the people preying on them.

    13. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's at least sort of spectrum, but it's painfully obvious that OP was referring to people on farther end of the spectrum. Your getting stuck on words rather than meaning, which is a very common flaw among slashdot commenters.

      And if we're being pedantic, 3 of your 4 examples of mental health issues are chronic, not things that people experience now and again. No one is intermittently autistic, demented, or suffering from ADHD. There's also a world of difference between the temporary bouts of depression people get, and the dementia of the elderly, or an extreme case of PTSD, or bipolarity.

    14. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... don't be too hard on your Dad.

      Be hard: He wanted someone to make his life easier and didn't ask questions when a total, unseen stranger promised to do just that. Religion provides a similar saviour. I hate fighting the same battles week after week, or repeating the battles of yesteryear: That makes me a grumpy old man; one who sees other old people demanding someone do their fighting for them. Perhaps the grumpiness is magnified because I know there is nobody to save me.

      ... cousin in jail.

      I know Americans like publically humiliating their inmates but I think this is more likely to be an informant inside the DoJ pointing scammers towards fresh victims.

      ... Fox News ...

      They claim they're the good guys, you're the victim and everyone else is a criminal. That's a classic long-game argument. It's easy to understand Fox News; they're scammers.

    15. Re:How could you fall for this? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      You can just hit end call, it shuffles to voicemail, and you can listen immediately. Very worth it not to have to interact with random people.

    16. Re:How could you fall for this? by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "No one is intermittently autistic, demented, or suffering from ADHD"

      But people can exhibit the symptoms to various degrees, and on more than one

      "Your getting stuck on words rather than meaning, which is a very common flaw among slashdot commenters"

      Not in this case, and you also need to consider that IQ, alone or in concert with the issues like ShanghaiBill and I mentioned, can be a huge contributing factor.

    17. Re:How could you fall for this? by ghoul · · Score: 0

      Why should telcos have to fix spoofing. This is evolution at play. Dumb people who just happen to have money because they lucked out by being born in a rich country are being cut down to their natural space in the scheme of things - penniless

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    18. Re:How could you fall for this? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That isn't evolution, moron. Many of the people targeted were immigrants who were afraid of the IRS or INS.

    19. Re:How could you fall for this? by plover · · Score: 1

      ... cousin in jail.

      I know Americans like publically humiliating their inmates but I think this is more likely to be an informant inside the DoJ pointing scammers towards fresh victims.

      Actually, calls about bail for a cousin, nephew, or grandson in a foreign jail is a fairly common and profitable scam. They prey upon people who have almost no understanding of how American bail system works, who realize they have no knowledge at all of how a South American, Asian, or African jail would work, and pile confusing legal words and urgency on top of it, along with implied threats to the treatment of their loved one if they don't pay.

      Getting a legitimate call from a local police station saying "come bail out your grandson" would be scary in real life -- now multiply the "scary factor" if you are led to believe the kid is halfway around the planet, in a corrupt police cell that you picture based on a scene from Midnight Express.

      I don't think "an informant inside the DoJ" has anything to do with this at all.

      --
      John
    20. Re:How could you fall for this? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Mental health is not a binary condition, where you either have it or you don't. It is a spectrum

      That was kind of my point - when you are so far along that you fall for scams like this, it's a strong indication that you need assistance.

    21. Re:How could you fall for this? by bws111 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The things that make them 'rather obvious scams' to you may not indicate 'rather obvious scam' to someone in a different situation, regardless of any 'mental health issues'. The fact you can't understand that is a character flaw on your part, not theirs.

      Things that mark it as 'obvious scam':
            They called you instead of sending a letter, etc. - Maybe the person already has debt problems and is used to getting collection calls demanding payment. Whats one more caller? Maybe the person actually HAS tax problems and has received a letter, but has not taken any action.

            Indian caller who barely speaks english - 25 years ago if you called customer service for any company you spoke to someone in the US who could speak english. Then companies started contracting out those call centers to India. There was no great announcement that this was happening, but when you called the same number you always called you were now talking to someone in India. Everyone knows their are government contractors. Is it entirely beyond reason that the government would do the same as those companies did? No.

            Method of payment - 20 years ago it would have been unthinkable to pay McDonalds or a vending machine with a credit card, now it is commonplace. A very short time ago it would be unthinkable that you just tap your phone and a payment is made, now it is commonplace. It used to be if you wanted a CVS gift card you went to CVS, now you can buy a CVS card at Lowes. Maybe the method of payment requested seems unusual or odd, but is it really any more odd than buying a Coke with a phone?

      In short, the more changes you have witnessed in your lifetime the less 'odd' any new changes seem. Things that to YOU may be giant red flags are just another change in an endless stream of changes.

      And even if they DO think something is odd they may pay anyway. Most older people are risk averse, and the things they value most are their home and their independence. Threaten to take either of those away and you have triggered a very strong fear response. The risk of losing a little money to a scam pales in comparison to losing their home or independence, so they pay.

      So why don't they ask for help if they suspect a scam? Because of assholes like you that think that is a sign they need to be 'taken care of and protected', thereby losing their independence.

    22. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then provide the unique serial number to the caller.

      Well, provide them with a fake serial number then. Should waste some of their time & effort.

    23. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone be afraid of a taxman? Pissed off - yes! But afraid?

    24. Re:How could you fall for this? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I am to the point where I treat anyone asking for money over the phone in any form as a scam. Sometimes even a "legitimate" company screws the pooch really badly with what I find to be hilarious results. I've been a dick to scammers and questionable companies for decades now and get a fair amount of enjoyment out of it. This does remind me that I should see if I can find my refillable air horn.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    25. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome diversion. Are you with Hillary or President Putin. I mean you have successfully diverted the blame from those committing the crine (e.g. Indians) to the evil white owned telecos. Good job. It is not the fault of those scammers, it is the fault of those evil white people that allow those noble indians to scam old senior citizens (some of whom are black)

      India innocent. White owned telephone companies guilty

    26. Re:How could you fall for this? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      when you are so far along that you fall for scams like this, it's a strong indication that you need assistance.

      So how much additional taxes are you willing to pay to provide 24/7 monitoring of every stupid person in the country?

    27. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and didn't ask questions

      We don't know what we don't know. In other words, there WILL be a person who grew up with no knowledge about certain things, Including unfortunately the validity of authorities contacting us about a heavy legal issue. Some people just trust the authorities & don't extend questions or beseech help from others.

      Dad could be an outstanding guy in his field, and may otherwise be a stalwart guy. Now he (and those of us who read) know what to look out for in the future.

    28. Re:How could you fall for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about people who were not lucky enough to be born with your level of IQ?
      Tens of millions of people have an IQ at or below 80.
      Couple this with poor education and the constant propaganda of Church and State telling people to respect and trust authority and it is very easy for some people to be scammed.

      It is a crime to take advantage of someone like this.
      Business is supposed to be about providing goods and services for a price a consumer wants to pay, not stealing as much as you can before you get caught.

    29. Re:How could you fall for this? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      So how much additional taxes are you willing to pay to provide 24/7 monitoring of every stupid person in the country?

      Who said anything about 24/7 monitoring?
      A financial guardian that needs to co-sign for all major expenses is not uncommon, nor that expensive, given that major expenses don't happen that often.

    30. Re:How could you fall for this? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It is a crime to take advantage of someone like this.

      Absolutely. I have not argued otherwise.

      But that doesn't mean we shouldn't try to help the victims too. If they prove that they cannot be trusted to make a judgement, and lose money in the process, I think a financial guardian might be in order. If they don't want that, well, I can't muster much sympathy.

  3. Spoofing numbers by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's technically trivial to block that type of spoofing. The only hold-back is that there's no penalty for the phone companies that sell to the scammers. Charge their US provider with accessory to the crime, and fine them $100M and this could never happen again. Require that all CLID sent be a valid call-back for the number sent.

    Yes, I know that this will be annoying for the outsourced call centers, where HP sells their call center to India and the Indian company calls an American with the CLID of the 1-800 number for HP, so the call looks like it's coming from the US, and if called back, gets to the right queue. But those edge cases don't justify allowing free range for the scammers.

    1. Re:Spoofing numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not all that hard to block spoofing and also allow HP to outsource its call center. You allow only HP to spoof lines as HP. Therefore in HP owns a call distribution node, any calls routed through it can use HP's number and caller ID, even if they come from India.
      Under this system, no one would be able to spoof a number they don't actually own, so you can hold the caller responsible for the content of the calls. If they don't want to be held responsible, they'd best be careful not to route bad actors through their network! Phone scams would disappear overnight.

    2. Re:Spoofing numbers by houghi · · Score: 1

      The thing is that you can putb in any number in your Ascent, Cisco or whatever system that you like. I have put them in and I could do technically whatever I desired.
      What we did was a part the standard callback number and a part nothing. Reason is because some people will only call back when they know the number and some will call back if they don't know it is us who want our money back.
      We never put in any different number, but it would have been trivial to do. What kept us from doing so was that we wanted people to call back and we did not want to go to jail.

      So even if this would not be possible in the US, it could be possible in India or other countries to do so without the help of the telecom operator.

      To prevent that you would need a LOT of countries to change their rules and have them enforce it to their local Telcos.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Spoofing numbers by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Virtually all of those call centers will VOIP to the US then use outbound POTS originating inside the US to complete the calls, thus avoiding any international calling charges. It would require some reworking of the system but the telcos could require that companies buy DID numbers/toll free numbers for their call centers and only allow those numbers when assigning outbound caller ID from the VOIP lines to the POTS network. That ties the caller ID to the physical POP but still allows flexibility in assigning caller ID strings for the company. This is why companies are allowed to set outbound caller ID now, but unfortunately it's an honor system. It goes back to a time before VOIP and no one anticipated it being used for evil (Life Advice: EVERYTHING can be used for evil, just always assume so).

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:Spoofing numbers by houghi · · Score: 1

      What would be needed is that the VoIP operators do this as the Telcos don't. So a VoIP operator should get a special status where they are obliged to give the "wrong" number.
      This could be seen as a standard phreak where people are called and asked to press #9 and then a number, so it looks as if the call comes from within the company as all that VoIP does is forwarding a call.
      The scam was used to do international calls and let the company you call pay for it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Spoofing numbers by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Not all that hard to block spoofing and also allow HP to outsource its call center. You allow only HP to spoof lines as HP. Therefore in HP owns a call distribution node, any calls routed through it can use HP's number and caller ID, even if they come from India.

      Or make HP route those calls through their own USA center so that no spoofing is needed. Then when a telephone company sees a USA HP number coming from India, they can block that call.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  4. If the voice is Indian, hang up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What useful message would EVER come from an Indian caller?

    1. Re:If the voice is Indian, hang up by arth1 · · Score: 2

      What useful message would EVER come from an Indian caller?

      "Your Kashmir Indica block is ready for pickup"?

    2. Re:If the voice is Indian, hang up by FranklinWebber · · Score: 1

      I object to your over-generalization. Here in the US, it's not uncommon to deal with first-generation immigrants both professionally and socially. In fact, I've been dealing with South-Asian-accented English speakers in the US my entire adult life (I am 60).

      My personal experience relating to the above news item:

      A couple of months ago I was called by someone speaking with a South Asian accent (I can't narrow it down more than that). He claimed to be calling from the FBI (not the IRS nor immigration as in the article) and he forcefully told me that I was in trouble with the law. His approach was unprofessional, which made me skeptical, so I asked to call him back. He told me to look up the number he was calling from, which did turn out to be the FBI office in Albany, NY. He even sounded _proud_ of this fact. Yes, the scammers may have proud of their ability to spoof my caller ID!

      I persisted, so he referred me to his supervisor. The supervisor _also_ spoke with a South Asian accent and _also_ started bullying me about being in trouble with the law. At this point I knew it was a scam and hung up.

      Had I been a good citizen I would have called the FBI myself to report this, but I was just glad to be done with it.

    3. Re:If the voice is Indian, hang up by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Not hard to notice 500 voices in the background too

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    4. Re:If the voice is Indian, hang up by Rande · · Score: 1

      I just hang up even if it's not an Indian. If it's not a voice I recognize, then I'm going make you jump through hoops to talk to me.
      If it's actually important, they'll call back. Calls from a call center never seem to be important.

      That said, I did once hang up on a cop. ...and whaddayaknow, he called back.

    5. Re:If the voice is Indian, hang up by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I often do this. I also hang up while I'm speaking so there's a plausible "we got cut off" excuse if it's someone I really do want/need to talk to.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    6. Re:If the voice is Indian, hang up by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I now want to answer the phone "CIA Special Activities Division, drone strike department" and then let them know a reaper strike has been ordered for their location.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  5. Oh, Darn by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 1

    Those calls were fun. I used to respond by being so insulting, abusive, and profane that the last "IRS" call ended with the "agent" shouting, "I'm coming to your house to shoot you in your face."

    1. Re:Oh, Darn by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      I like upsetting them too. One of them got so upset that he threatened that he was going to have Al Quaida come to my house and cut my head off with a sword. I just laughed and told him I live in Texas, and that if he was crazy enough to send someone armed with a knife to a gun fight, I was ready for them...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    2. Re:Oh, Darn by anegg · · Score: 1

      I told one of these guys that I believed he enjoyed an unusual relationship with his mother, then hung up on him. He called me back to call me names, so I suggested that he needed to pay a visit to his mother, and hung up on him again. It would be funny, except for the fact that some people fall for this kind of scam, and end up being bilked out of a lot of money. I hope the folks who perpetrated these ripoffs spend a very long time in a very not nice prison.

    3. Re:Oh, Darn by sheramil · · Score: 1

      Those calls were fun. I used to respond by being so insulting, abusive, and profane that the last "IRS" call ended with the "agent" shouting, "I'm coming to your house to shoot you in your face."

      i did that, once. the guy was absolutely furious, but in the end all he could do was forward my number to half a dozen other scammers, which meant instead of one or two calls a week i got a call every night, around 6:00 PM, for about two months. when they called, i'd play the infamous Dog Pound Found Sound CD for them (https://archive.org/details/BadDogRadioMassacre-DogPoundFoundSound).

  6. Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been a long time coming! Somehow I feel like 61 is just a drop in the bucket. Keep it up FBI good job! Now THIS is exactly what gives credence to your existence. Now if you could just stop mass surveillance on tax payers that would be another step in the right direction.

  7. only if HP pays the outsourcing tax by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    only if HP pays the outsourcing tax

  8. What? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Feds Charge 61 People In Indian-Based IRS Phone Scam Case.

    What do you mean? Big Indian or Little Indian?

    1. Re:What? by plover · · Score: 1

      Feds Charge 61 People In Indian-Based IRS Phone Scam Case.

      What do you mean? Big Indian or Little Indian?

      You, sir, made me laugh so hard I almost sprayed my drink across the table! You have won the internets today. Thank you for playing!

      --
      John
  9. I Almost Never Agree by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Informative

    In phone rooms the owners often tell the staff that it is a moral wrong to leave stupid people with a penny in their pocket. I really never agreed with that. But this IRS scam is so stupid and transparent that anyone who feel for it has to be so stupid that they really are a menace to society. Money gives the really stupid a certain amount of power. I almost agree with the phone room owners in this case. If anything prosecute these jerks for making annoying phone calls. Obviously phone room prosecutions are symbolic in nature and not intended to shut down a crooked industry. Most years the feds prosecute about 20 phone rooms. They go after the big dollar scams as a rule. For Lauderdale easily has over 1,000 phone rooms going on any given day. There are zero honest rooms. Some of the schemes are so complex that the staff doesn't even know they are involved in a criminal enterprise. Sometimes it is done by running one room that makes tiny sales and another room across town that uses the leads from the tiny sales to recall the buyer and sock it to them big time with a scam. The first room never knows that the second room exists. One clue that you are about to be taken is when you are asked to write a check with the company names initials. In other words the friendly salesman says make the check out to N.M.I. instead of National Mortgage incorporated. That check will then be cashed by National Marketing Inc.. So if the feds do come knocking national Mortgage claims no knowledge and they just happened to rent space to a marketing company that closed down and left town. These companies never sell in their own states. That way they only have to worry about the feds.

    1. Re:I Almost Never Agree by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      But this IRS scam is so stupid and transparent that anyone who feel for it has to be so stupid that they really are a menace to society.

      If you were talking about people our age, you'd be right. The problem is that these people largely prey on the elderly, many of whom are much less street-smart than folks decades younger. They're from a generation born when these sorts of scams were relatively rare, so if somebody called saying they were from the IRS, they probably were from the IRS—particularly if they have lots of your personal information. It isn't easy to teach college-age folks how to reliably recognize social engineering, much less the elderly. This goes double if they have any sort of mild dementia.

      These people prey on the helpless. That makes them utterly inhuman in my book.

      For[t] Lauderdale easily has over 1,000 phone rooms going on any given day.

      Is it any wonder why they're all in Florida (snowbird central)?

      These companies never sell in their own states.

      That might have been true in the old days, before they discovered VoIP-based caller ID spoofing. These days, they can sell anywhere from anywhere. All they need is a mailbox somewhere.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:I Almost Never Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... who fell for it has to be so stupid ...

      People tend to believe the first thing they are told; then the emotional reaction to that appears: That tends to be lust, greed or fear driving people to stop thinking and start doing stupid things. It takes a bit of education, a bit of emotional discipline, a bit of cynicism to stop and ask: "Is this how the world works?" Of course, if someone believes the police/IRS/Microsoft are going to enter his life via telephone and demand money, he really is stupid and a menace to society.

    3. Re:I Almost Never Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are these wonderful things called paragraphs, use them.

    4. Re:I Almost Never Agree by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Oh please. This has nothing to do with how 'street smart' older people are. What a stupid thing to say. It has to do with fear. Older people are naturally risk-averse, and the things many of them value most are their homes and their independence. You threaten to take away either of those things and you trigger a very strong fear response. Even if they suspect it is a scam the risk of losing some money is nothing compared to the risk of losing their home or independence.

    5. Re:I Almost Never Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well said.

    6. Re:I Almost Never Agree by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Oh please. This has nothing to do with how 'street smart' older people are. What a stupid thing to say. It has to do with fear.

      That might be partially true in this specific situation, but the fact remains that the elderly are also much more frequently the victims of many other types of scams that don't involve fear. Pyramid schemes, 419 and sweepstakes scams, fraud involving expensive subscriptions tucked away in the fine print of purchases, people pretending to be family members needing money, etc. all disproportionately affect the elderly.

      Now I'll grant you that the elderly are often less likely to report having been scammed out of fear that their kids will get them declared incompetent, and this might make them more popular targets for scammers, but the fact that they are more easily scammed to begin with isn't (necessarily) because of fear.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:I Almost Never Agree by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Except for the subscription scams (which I don't know catch the elderly more than anyone else), and the 'family members' scam (more later), ALL of those are based on fear. It is funny that you claim to be so wise, but you can't see that simple fact.

      A young person that gets into financial trouble, or thinks he may need more money in the future, has options. Maybe he can get another job. Maybe he can make a legitimate but risky investment. Maybe he can sponge off the parents for a while. Maybe he can cut back on spending for a while until he has saved enough money. Maybe he declares bankruptcy and gets a fresh start after a few years.

      An elderly person in financial trouble has no options. They may be physically unable to work, even if someone is willing to hire them. At that stage of life, a risky (high-paying) investment is as bad as a scam. There is no 'sponging' or 'cutting back' for a while, because the situation is NEVER going to improve. There is no time for a fresh start. The only available option may be 'give up your home and independence and go live in a county home'.

      Now, if you don't think being in that situation causes enormous fear, you are an idiot. In these cases, the scammers aren't CAUSING the fear, they are EXPLOITING the existing fear. They are offering a way out of a dire situation, even if it 'sounds to good to be true'. Of course the scam may seem like a TERRIBLE option, but it may also seem like the ONLY option. Their choice may be down to 'lose my home to taxes and medical bills and go live in the county home', or 'lose my money to a scammer and go live in the county home'. One of the at least APPEARS to offer a way out, and if it doesn't the outcome is the same anyway.

      As for the family member scam, that is again fear. Namely fear of being forgetten or ill-remembered.

      You want to keep your parents or grandparents from falling victim to a scam? Try TALKING to them, and not in a condescending 'you are not very smart' or 'you are too gullible' manner. Find out what their fears are, and see if there is anything you can do to ease them. And if you talk to them regularly and let them know what you are doing, they are going to be less vulnerable to a 'needs help' scam. Of course, your method of just blaming them requires much less effort on your part.

  10. I hope that stops the calls by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 2

    I've been getting the following for months.

    I need you or your retained attorney of records to return the call. The issue at hand is extremely time sensitive. My phone number is 213-289-####.

    Do not disregard this message and do return the call. Now if you don't return the call and I don't hear from your attorney either then the only thing I can do is wish you a good luck as the situation totally unfolds on you. Good bye.

    I blocked part of the phone number just in case it belongs to some innocent person, but it probably doesn't and I was tempted to leave it. The phone number is also different every time they call anyway, but the message is the same.

    Anyway, the message sounds so ominous but also so ridiculous. It doesn't give a hint at who is delivering this threat. Could it be the IRS? An old landlord? My ex-wife? It's the best, because by not saying it could apply to almost anyone.

    I do have an unpaid parking ticket from about 25 years ago.

    I guess "good luck" is on my side though because the situation has not totally unfolded on me.

    1. Re:I hope that stops the calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No this will not stop the calls. The masterminds behind this operation likely outsourced call centers just like legal businesses do.

      I really doubt that they got the real masterminds behind this operation.

      As for spoofing. Pretty much all these scam artists spoof phone numbers. Why this is allowed is beyond me. I have MMS and all that cool hipster crap disabled and even then once in a while I receive plain old SMS message with clearly spoofed source. It's not even a fucking phone number. They can spoof it to be any text string, like an e-mail address. Ridiculous.

      Calls? Robocallers won't say anything untill you speak. If you pick up and don't speak they will hang up. If you speak it goes to callcenter operator.

      Can't block, can't do anything.

    2. Re:I hope that stops the calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calls? Robocallers won't say anything untill you speak. If you pick up and don't speak they will hang up. If you speak it goes to callcenter operator.

      Can't block, can't do anything.

      You just say hello, let it go to the callcenter, then you say hello again to get them start talking, and then either mute the phone or, if you so inclined, string them along.

      The point is to waste as much of their operator time as possible, that's how you cost them money. The more people do this, the less profitable these callcenter will be.

    3. Re:I hope that stops the calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has not "unfolded" on me either ;-)

    4. Re:I hope that stops the calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe the situation has totally unfolded, but it was so small that you didn't notice it.

    5. Re:I hope that stops the calls by plover · · Score: 1

      On the rare occasion when NoMoRobo* lets a spam call through to my house phone, I make it a point to say no more than the single word "Hello" when answering. Back before "slamming" was regulated, sleazy telemarketers would record the call and edit the right words in their recording:

      Victim: Hello?
      McSleaze: Hi, is this Mister Victim?
      Victim: Yes.
      McSleaze: Hi, Mr. Victim, can we change your long distance provider to ScamCo, and charge you double your current rates?
      Victim: Hell no. [hangup]

      They'd submit "your request" to change long distance providers anyway, and rearrange the recording so it sounded like you answered "Yes" to their question.

      I don't know if there are any yes/no scams still out there, but if there are, I don't want to enable them. Besides, if it's a robot, I don't want the call anyway.

      * NoMoRobo is a totally awesome service that diverts calls from known call center services. My home phone almost never rings from pesky salesmen, charities, or pollsters anymore.

      --
      John
    6. Re:I hope that stops the calls by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to a stupid debt collector. They use tactics like that, although the one I put the screws to used the same number every time. Anything that is important will be sent through the mail, usually certified with delivery confirmation, so crap like that is safe to ignore.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  11. One of my family members fell for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes this so sad is she thinks everybody is scamming her and out to get her. Well except for the one guy who actually was scamming her with this IRS scam. Of course then there's my brother that is such a right wing nut job that he actually thinks that Obama wouldn't just use people from India to call for the IRS, he'd would actually REQUIRE the IRS to have the calls done by Indians.

  12. Let's go after the low-level phone people as well by BUL2294 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In addition to those who perpetuated the scam, I feel that since the Thune, India police know the low-level employees who actually spoke from the scripts, I'd love to see the US indict those people, have them beg their families for Rupees to fight extradition in an Indian court, lose that fight, put them on a plane to the US, then let them beg their families again for $$$ for an expensive American lawyer, then rot in a Federal prison for the next 5+ years, then be banned from the USA for life over the felony conviction. With enough stories like that to go around, even destitute people will refuse to work for scammers--including those working for "Windows Company Support".

    I have no sympathy for anyone at any level of this scam, including the low-level people following the scripts and making/answering the calls--those pretending to be IRS agents & scaring old ladies into giving up their life savings. These people know English and therefore know they are impersonating an agent of a foreign government (in this case, the big bad US Government, and its unlimited resources). It stands to reason that the foreign government in question might come after them one day. They probably also got a (teeny tiny) cut of each successful con, which makes this all the worse... Make an example out of them...

    --
    Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
  13. Needful by Threni · · Score: 1

    Kindly to be not making me your bitch, sir. I am working for Microsoft.

    1. Re:Needful by dlingman · · Score: 1

      It's sad that when i read that comment, I read it in a mix between Apu's and Ben Jabituya's voices.

    2. Re:Needful by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Newton: You're shitting me!
      Ben: I am not shitting upon you sir.

    3. Re:Needful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Requesting to revert and to do the needful

  14. IRS & their thugs created the fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad how people are so fearful of their own government that they're easily scared into giving away so much money to unknown recipients. I would love to live in a country where a real court trial had to happen before punishment was meted out.

  15. Good! by nanodec · · Score: 1

    These pricks called me once and I told them right where to go! Glad that they are finally caught!

  16. Ha ha by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used to toy with these idiots and waste massive amounts of their time. They'd get so upset that they'd be screaming at me before they hung up (I counted that as a "win" for me).

    There's no letdown like thinking you got a live one on the line, wasting 30 minutes reeling him in, only to have him start asking "What does it feel like to bang a goat?" or "Have I wasted enough of your time or should we keep going?"

    I loved asking them if they had "updog", and when they'd ask "What is updog?" I'd yell "NOT MUCH MOTHERFUCKER!!"

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Ha ha by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      only to have him start asking "What does it feel like to bang a goat?"

      My response to those questions has been "I don't know, go ask your mother" which usually sends them into a raging tirade of curse words in languages I don't know.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  17. Car Warranty by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

    I used to get a ton of these offering to sell me a high price car warranty. My car is still under warranty, so at first I dismissed it outright...but after 6 or 7 of these calls a week, I started to hassle the guys back. My favorite is when a guy tried to sell me a warranty, and I told him that I no longer had the car, but he could get me a quote for my new car if he wanted. I told him it was a Bugatti Veyron SuperSport (http://www.bugatti.com/veyron/veyron-164-super-sport/). He was like "hmm....I don't see that in my system. Is that Italian?". He was less than amused when I told him to Google it and the starting price was $1.8 million.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    1. Re:Car Warranty by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I always like trying to get a warranty on my '96 Jeep Cherokee with 370,000+ miles on it. I once tried to get it for my 68 MG Midget. In all cases I was told off for wasting their time.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  18. Re:Let's go after the low-level phone people as we by plover · · Score: 2

    I'd rather have them rot in an Indian jail, thank you very much. As a taxpayer, I'd be paying to have them rot in an American jail. Let outsourcing save me some money for a change.

    --
    John
  19. the situation totally unfolds on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So YOU'RE the guy responsible for Trump's presidential run.
    thanks a lot, asshat.

  20. jail's too good for that lot by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Throw them in jail and make India pay for it.
    hmmm, sounds familiar.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:jail's too good for that lot by plover · · Score: 1

      Please don't lump me in with that particular lump.

      In this case, they violated Indian laws, so the Indian police are able to arrest and prosecute them. The US just provided assistance in identifying the Indian criminals to the Indian authorities. There's likely zero chance any US victims will be able to sue and recover their funds, which is the only unfortunate part about letting them sit in India. But it's not like they'd get any money if the thieves were rotting in a US jail, anyway.

      --
      John
  21. Unfortunately there's a reason for Spoofing by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    There is a legit reason to spoof. People in hiding from abusive spouses, basic PBX, anonymous tips, reporters --- anyone who either wants to hide their identity or assume another one. For instance - when I call from my office I want the caller ID to be that of the main front desk so that a customer can have the call answered when they call back (if I'm busy or maybe somebody else can help them). This requires spoofing - even when I'm using my virtual phone.

    How to lock it down? It is the Text that is spoofed sometimes - not the number. "IRS" is the text, but the number is 314-1592.

    We used to have an after hours call center - they handled calls for several businesses. If they called a customer back for us - they spoofed our caller id. If I called from my home afterhours - I spoofed my company caller ID rather than my home, again with virtual PBX software. Okay - may be can be encrypted somehow to make sure that only "I" spoof my company. But for people in hiding, or a true anonymous tip, it is a one-off thing that doesn't have an easy answer.

    I've heard this is a hard problem to solve. Interviews with experts all paint the complex picture.

    1. Re:Unfortunately there's a reason for Spoofing by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      For instance - when I call from my office I want the caller ID to be that of the main front desk so that a customer can have the call answered when they call back (if I'm busy or maybe somebody else can help them). This requires spoofing - even when I'm using my virtual phone.

      No it does not requie spoofing. I've done it. The extension you are calling from is passed through the PBX that "owns" the front desk number. Any call from that PBX can legitimately use any number assigned to it without "spoofing". Now, if your "virtual phone" were to use a 3rd party gateway that had no connection to those numbers, then it would be spoofing.

      But, as I said, if the fine was on the carrier for $100,000,000, then they'd allow spoofing. They'd just require more paperwork and verification. So your branch office in NY could call out and would "spoof" the main 1-800 number, and the branch office in CA could do the same, while the main office in Chicago would present the 1-800 number without spoofing. Again, it's all trivial. But there are a few edge cases that some would complain about. But those edge cases aren't worth the gain from simply turning off fraud overnight.

      It should also be required by law that any number on any service can have "blocked" and "unknown" calls blocked by the carrier with a standard tone/message that indicates that number doesn't accept hidden calls. Most of the collections services and such will always hide their number, and if they can't present a fraudulent one, they'll present nothing. To help with the increase in blocked CLID, the carriers should provide that functionality to protect their customers.

      The technical issues are trivial and solved. But there's no business will to turn on these features. So, when the corporations refuse to protect their customers, the law should step in and do it.

    2. Re:Unfortunately there's a reason for Spoofing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a legit reason to spoof. People in hiding from abusive spouses, basic PBX, anonymous tips, reporters --- anyone who either wants to hide their identity or assume another one.

      None of these are legitimate reasons to allow anonymous or spoofed calls to people who don't want to receive them. Accepting such calls could and should be a matter of opting in - just as with all advertising.

      We make kidnapping a crime because it involves stealing a portion of somebody's life. Unsolicited sales, religious, political, or criminal calls or emails or smails should all be treated the same by the law - because they all ultimately involve stealing a portion of somebody's life.

  22. All the Calls did stop !! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    The run up to this had twice daily calls coming to my house. Then nothing since.

    I found it interesting that a few months ago I'd get a few calls per month. But they must known the police were coming and trying to build up cash quickly before disappearing and leaving others holding the bag. In the final weeks the call rate intensified and changed nature - I now had Live people calling (had been strictly "This is automated message from IRS -please call us back you are being sued"). No time to wait - get the live ones and convert them to cash.

  23. I put them on three-way with each other by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I save a couple of the asshole's numbers, then when I get another call I click "Add Call" and forward them to another telemarketer / scammer. Then I just listen while the Viagra guy pitches the alarm system guy and vice versa.

  24. Re:Let's go after the low-level phone people as we by mjwx · · Score: 1

    In addition to those who perpetuated the scam, I feel that since the Thune, India police know the low-level employees who actually spoke from the scripts, I'd love to see the US indict those people, have them beg their families for Rupees to fight extradition in an Indian court, lose that fight,

    Sounds like you're not familiar with India. They will have to pay a very small amount of Rupees not to be found by police whilst the US will have to pay a very large amount of Rupees for the police not to find them.

    Secondly, there's a billion Indians, the US will run out of money three times over before they run out of volunteers.

    Thirdly, the scammers will just move to another country where the US has no clout and the process will start all over again.

    This is not fight you can win through legal battles, its a fight against stupidity in the US, not against poor people in India. The only way you can fight it is to educate people.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  25. Hawalas by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    The whole scam seems to rely on the ability of the Hawalas to ship Money across national borders. But I find it hard to believe that they would use 100s of these people, presumably this boils down to a handful of bent Hawala agents that can be tracked, or has bitcoin rendered that unfeasible ?

    --
    Nullius in verba
  26. Here's some details on how it worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paraphrased from the unsealed indictment:

    1) Call center threatens victims with jail time if they don't pay tax fine
    2) Victim instructed to buy a number of moneypak cards and email or call scammer with moneypak ids for the cards
    3) Moneypak cards are transferred to Green Dot reloadable cards
    4) Reloadable cards are converted to money orders
    5) Money orders are deposited into a bunch of various us bank accounts
    6) Those bank accounts are used to pay off "Hawaladar" money transfers from India to US (underground banking) (This last step isn't clear how the money moved out of the banks but at least some of this happened)

    It shows how gullable people are. One guy bought $139,000 worth of cash cards (276 MoneyPak cards) and emailed the ids of the card to the "IRS" thinking that would pay his tax fine.

    I suspect they are still chasing other whales who are on the receiving end of any transfers out of those bank accounts because they arent mentioned in this document.

  27. A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your next target could be the guy "from VISA and MasterCard" who keeps calling me about my credit card problem, or maybe the guy from "the bank" who flagged issues with my account, that would be awesome.

    It was fun for a while to fuck with them, insult their fucked up rape loving culture, and talk about how much I love to kill and eat cows, but I've been over that for years now, and enough is enough.

  28. Mohammed tries BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mohammed: Did you see Mohammed at the meeting today?
    Mohammed: No, but his brother Mohammed showed up.
    Mohammed: What did Mohammed talk about?
    Mohammed: Mohammed introduced us to Mohammed who is also a mason!
    Mohammed: A mason? No shit? How long has he been one?
    Mohammed: About five years. He was referred to the local lodge by Mohammed.
    Mohammed: Ah, yes, Mohammed. He has a shit ton of connections around town!
    Mohammed: Yes, and our brothers, police be upon them, Mohammed and Mohammed from Egypt came, too.
    Mohammed: I've been thinking of becoming a clown.
    Mohammed: A clown, Mohammed, why?
    Mohammed: So I can film myself being gay.
    Mohammed: Oh, you.
    Mohammed: So anyway, is Mohammed, Mohammed, and Mohammed coming to the next party?
    Mohammed: Indeed. Mohammed was so funny last time.
    Mohammed: Well it wouldn't be a party without Mohammed.
    Mohammed: Yes, my friend. POLICE BE UPON THEM!

  29. Spoofing Phone Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I admit I am not tech-savvy, but love reading the comments of you who obviously are. I can, however, repair your washer, dryer, refrigerator or any other major appliance with ease. That aside, why is the FCC allowing spoofed phone ID's to be transmitted?
    I pay for Caller ID from Verizon on my Glxy5, but lately, it does not want to provide names, just prefix locations. What has become of our privacy?

    Any steps I can take to avoid telemarketers on my business cell phone? Any and all advice is appreciated, thanks!

  30. All callers got a small commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard on NPR it was just a few percent. But with five figure extortion amounts, that goes a long and provides a strong incentive.