Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Unveils Residential 'Solar Roof' With Updated Battery Storage System (theverge.com)

Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk today unveiled the "residential roof" -- pegged as a roofing replacement -- with solar energy gathering powers. Unlike other solar systems which must be mounted on top of a traditional roof, these new panels are actually integrated within glass roof tiles, replacing a home's roof, Musk said. And because they're made of glass, Musk says they will last "quasi indefinitely," even in harsh conditions where snow and ice make short work of traditional asphalt shingles. Musk said that 50 years of lifespan should be no problem, and they offer efficiency that is 98 percent as good as a traditional, ugly photovoltaic panel. From a report on The Verge: There are a number of different versions of solar panels: Textured Glass Tile, Slate Glass Tile, Tuscan Glass Tile, and Smooth Glass Tile. Tesla says its glass tiles are much more durable than conventional roof tile -- something that's important in areas with risk of hail.The products are a "joint collaboration" between SolarCity and Tesla, according to SolarCity CEO Lyndon Rive. Tesla is attempting to acquire SolarCity for $2.6 billion and shareholders of both companies will vote on the proposed acquisition in the middle of November. The Powerwall 2 can store 14 kWh of energy, with a 5 kW continuous power draw, and 7 kW peak. The battery is warranted for unlimited power cycles for up to 10 years. It can be floor or wall mounted, inside or outside. It can be used for load shifting or back-up power. Musk says there are three parts to the solar energy solution: generation (solar panels), storage (batteries), and transportation (electric cars). Musk's plan is to sell all three of those products through Tesla.

39 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Guess what Elon has never seen by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TENNIS BALL-SIZED HAIL EXPECTED. Take Cover Now (and not under a glass roof, you dingus).

    1. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Had a friend buy a hail-damaged car. He'd heard about hail sales and was looking to buy at the time. We walked the lot after a hail storm. The damaged cars had lots of dents in the metal, but not a single broken glass. The Texas dealership said that was common. Glass designed to take it is quite strong. Even bulletproof.

    2. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by tofu2go · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it looks like Tesla has thought of that... apparently their "glass" tile is tougher than conventional tiles. See this CNET video for reference: https://youtu.be/uWcGRYT-aeE?t... If a conventional roof can withstand it, then so can theirs.

    3. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Interesting
      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      Too bad I am stuck in their fucking scam of a lease.

      Indeed. If you had been stuck in the lease of a scam then a lawyer could have collected huge fees on the aforementioned fuckage... you, however would have still just got the fuckage.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I purchased a hail damaged Accord in north Florida for $7K off the price and got a paintless dent repair guy to pull up the dents with a suction cup attached to a compressor for $500. Total win. You can't tell the car was damaged, at all.

    6. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is actually quite irrelevant. Glass is weak and depends on it's structure to make it strong. The reason cars don't often suffer hail damage is due to the angle of incidence of the hail hitting the windows. Most damage is on the roof, bonnet, and boot (trunk for the America sedan owners), where the hail lands almost perpendicularly and can impart all of it's force into the thing it hits. By comparison window hits often happen at a very low incidence angle so only a tiny portion of the force is transferred into the glass. This is also why in a hail storm the most commonly damaged window by far is the front window despite also being the strongest of all windows in a car.

      Strength comes from structure. The reason solar panels are strong is because they are supported underneath. Glass (especially tempered glass) performs very well under compression. The strength comes not only from the glass, but the substrate behind it and the metal backing of the panel. A typical solar panel is far more durable than a sheet of tempered glass alone.

      Anecdote: I lived in a city with some ferocious hailstorms. Not just big round balls of hail, but irregular and sharp shaped blocks too. All of my solar panels survived. All of my neighbours' survived. All of our cars were completely written off and has massive amounts of damaged glass too (and in my case the inside turned into a bit of a swimming pool).

    7. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dbIII · · Score: 4, Informative

      Glass is very, very strong - which is why it is used in glass fibre reinforced plastic. It is however normally very brittle as in it can't absorb a lot of impact energy without cracking.
      If you add something to absorb the energy, such as a sandwich of plastic between layers of glass in a car's windscreen you end up with something that is tough enough to take some impacts without cracking.


      For a first year engineering materials practical I used to get students to load up horizontal glass rods with a lot of weight until they bowed a lot. You need a very smooth surface so that cracks won't start from tiny scratches, so that meant preparing with Hydrofluoric acid (don't try it at home!). That gave the students a bit of an insight into the difference between strength (maximum load) and toughness (energy which is proportional to the area under a curve of load versus extension).

    8. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is actually quite irrelevant. Glass is weak and depends on it's structure to make it strong.

      Is hail that big a problem for most people? I'm sure for some people it is, just like some people have to deal with tornadoes, and others have to deal with heat waves, and others flooding. But most people don't have to worry about them, and for them, this is great.

      BTW we get the odd hail storm here, in the lat 30 years we've had two big ones that were enough to break stuff, and even the it was only in some suburbs, not the entire city. So these rare cases would be covered by insurance. A small additional cost is still probably going to be cheaper than 30 years of paying electricity bills

    9. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by bgarcia · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    10. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's also a matter of scale - the metal panels of cars are quite thin compared to their glass. And then there's the classic flexible vs brittle contrast - metal will flex and permanently deform, while glass will flex and rebound - until it flexes so far that it shatters.

      Hit a glass panel with a big (fast) enough hailstone and it will break - it's just a matter of making the glass strong enough to survive the typical hailstones encountered within a 50 or 100 or 500 year period (depending on how much you are willing to pay now to not have to replace your roof later.)

      The fun part of this is changing weather patterns, how accurately can we predict the size and speed of hailstones 50 years from now? Since Elon's shingles are a brand new concept with essentially no competition, if he's got any class at all he'll over-design them so that they are more robust than they need to be. 15-20 years after they gain significant adoption in the marketplace, competition will shave their structural integrity down and down, saving a few cents on production costs in order to be the low price leader in the marketplace and simultaneously creating a shingle replacement labor market which actually costs far more than stronger (thicker) glass shingles that last twice as long would.

    11. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      If you're going to sell a premium product at a premium price, you'll have to do these kind of "toughness" demos to have any chance in the marketplace.

      Give it 20 years or so, when competing manufacturers enter the market they'll start cheaping out the panels until they last more or less just as long as "conventional" roofing.

    12. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Could be even less. Our typical roof tiles last 40 years (mine are now at 75 years, and it's definitely time to replace), but solar panel output drops to a level where you need to replace them after 20 or so years. Longevity of the tiles isn't the issue, it's the dropping power output and the high cost of replacing the roof ever 20 years versus the cost of replacing the roof every 40 and separate panels every 20.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    13. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bingo. I live on Colorado front range where we got golf ball size hail regularly. Thus summer our exposed hail resistant shingles failed with golf balls. Otoh, the Solar city panels? Not a scratch. Obviously the original poster has not a clue of what he is speaking.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    14. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Any plague of frogs or locusts?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > but solar panel output drops to a level where you need to replace them after 20 or so years.

      Citation? Solar panel output only drops about 0.5-7% a year. https://electrek.co/2016/07/04/solarcity-increase-useful-lifetime-of-solar-power-installations/

    16. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by burtosis · · Score: 2

      In the video there is a thick pillow/foam pad under each tile which greatly enhances impact resistance and yet won't be a part of any practical installation. They all failed including the tesla tile, though it looks like it might still provide some limited protection against water intrusion. The clay tile is a bit silly as you typically don't see many installations in heavy hail climates. Note that an asphalt tile, such as the majority of the United States is roofed with, would likely suffer little to no visible damage in this test and was omitted from it. Though after an impact like that the water repelling nature of an asphalt tile would likely be compromised.

      It will also be interesting to know the minimum slope that these can be applied on, and how practical they are on roof surfaces facing the wrong way.

      Que the home owners who buy this solar roofing and get it hail damaged then insurance companies won't replace it due to the increased cost. I doubt any insurance would cover it untill many lawsuits from outraged customers force changes.

    17. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Disclaimer: I work for a solar panel manufacturer.

      Our best prediction is that at least 99% of our panels will output at least 70% of their power after 40 years. Trying to get that out to 50 years now.

      Panel longevity and reduced output has come a long way.

    18. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      I was in a hail storm/tornado a few years back the tornado was an f4 and passed a little over a mile from my work. The baseball sized hail hit us though we had an open parking lot full of cars and I had to tackle a co-worker and hold her on the ground because she was determined to run outside and move her brand new mustang. Every car in the parking lot was totaled mine actually had upper parts of the frame that were bent and the roof was bent so far down that the metal split at the top where the front windshield had been. It looked more like the car had been hit with a sledge hammer than hail. Solar panels didn't survive that storm.

      We have a storms like that probably once every ten years it's why I have a garage and don't have solar panels.

    19. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by macmurph · · Score: 3, Informative

      This isn't true. Even ten years ago an 18% efficient panel would be energy positive after about about 1.5 to 2.5 years anywhere in the lower 48 states. The Silevo polycrystalline cells used by SolarCity in this application are between 22 to 24% efficient. Then factor in that you don't need an underlying roof and the embodied energy goes down. Plus increased surface area of a tesla solar roof vs modules on the roof will mean that the embodied energy is amortized more rapidly as some tiles will be 'working' harder than others in areas that modules never would have been placed.

      The only thing that might make this system better is liquid cooling heat exchange or phase change material and/or maybe aerogel blanket beneath. Then the cell efficiency would go way up as the cells are cooled and hot water is generated for the building. Aerogel would insulate the roof. But all of that would add cost, complexity, and liability. In meantime SolarCity must focus on profit and a sustainable business model.

    20. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by adolf · · Score: 2

      There were locusts at my mother's house a few years ago, in numbers rather short of a plague. They ate the swimming pool. They ate the vinyl siding. They ate the window screens.

      I wish I were making any of this up.

    21. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Informative
      So far they don't know how long solar panels will last. There are solar cells from the 50-60's still producing power.

      The biggest problem for failure over the long term will be the framing, the racks, and the wiring. The cells themselves, absent stray rocks, will probably produces a useable amounts of power for over a hundred years. We are talking about he crystal/glass setups, not the plastic variety solar cells. Currently quite a few of the manufactures under promise the output of their cells so that they will still produce the rated amount of power for at least 20 years for their warranties. They seem to loose 5-10% of their output every decade or so.

    22. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by Raistlin77 · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing above-ground swimming pool with vinyl liner.

    23. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      You insinuated that they were going up because of the disaster, not simple inflation. There's a difference.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  2. Re:Step 1 by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

    Ideas are a dime a dozen. Without any return there's no motivation for capital to pay for development into the products that are actually valuable. Don't get me wrong, I support open source as much as the next guy but paid innovation has an important roll to fill for all the people out there who are rich and want to stay that way while still contributing. We're not in the Star Trek universe yet.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  3. quasi-infinite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "quasi indefinitely," even in harsh conditions where snow and ice make short work of traditional asphalt shingles. Musk said that 50 years of lifespan should be no problem

    Europe has buildings with 1000 year old roofs, and it is somehow a little bit amusing to hear 50 years referred to as "quasi infinite".

  4. Verge of being cost effective by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Powerwall 2 can store 14 kWh of energy

    In other words, they've improved it from storing $1 worth of electricity to $1.40. But you still need to cycle it many thousands of times with FREE electricity before it breaks even.

    A quick search shows that the average household electricity usage is about 10K kWh per year (900-ish per month), ranging from 14K in Louisiana to 6K in Hawaii.

    Using your numbers, that would be roughly $1000/yr. The powerwall costs roughly $7000 installed with inverter and other extras, or you can lease it for 9 years for $5,000 which includes installation, a maintenance agreement, the electrical inverter and control systems.

    Tesla is offering a ten year warranty on the batteries, and there's some discussion about how a battery can last for 3650 cycles (mostly because the 14K powerwall is a 20K battery pack that's discharged much more shallowly than if it was an actual 14K battery, and other tricks).

    The total cost comes out to about 0.15/kWh.

    "Tentative Conclusion: The battery is right on the verge of being cost effective to buy across most of the US for day/night arbitrage. And it’s even more valuable if outages come at a high economic cost."

    1. Re:Verge of being cost effective by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 2

      "Tentative Conclusion: The battery is right on the verge of being cost effective to buy across most of the US for day/night arbitrage. And itâ(TM)s even more valuable if outages come at a high economic cost."

      Except that as the prevalence of storage becomes higher, the day/night arbitrage gets lower and so the cost effectiveness of storage goes down.

      California has already hit this for solar, the peak load on the system is now right after dark when the solar cuts out and people get home and turn on their gadgets. People that bought panels and computed the lifetime cost curve based on the old peak plans are now never going to recoup their investment.

  5. Re:Cue the oil trolls in 3...2...1 by penguinoid · · Score: 2

    I hear that oil companies really know how to grease palms...

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  6. Re:How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by swb · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think lead acid isn't terrible if you have the space, but really to get the most life out of a lead acid battery you have to look at max discharge as about 60% even using absorbed glass mat (AGM) batteries to get anything like long life cycles.

    So your 1 kWh battery is only really useful for about 400 Wh which means you need 35 of them.

    But it's more complicated than that, as you'd be better off driving an inverter at 48v and using something like 6v golf cart type batteries arranged in series/parallel strings to get to 48v and probably want some kind of more sophisticated charging/monitoring system to keep track of individual batteries and be able to isolate 48v groups if a unit failed. Usually more individual batteries gets you higher aggregate discharge rates since you pull less from any one battery.

    I don't think it's impossible to built a decent setup, but doing it right will end up being more expensive than you'd think and will end up sucking a ton of space.

    I think the half assed compromise is probably 4x 8D AGM 12v batteries in a 24v series/parallel combination, which would get you close to 14 kWh. But the batteries alone are $2k and then the inverter more yet.

  7. Where's the smart panel? by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the PowerWall would be most useful with a smart panel that allowed individual circuits to be prioritized in various ways when running off battery power to maximize run time.

    Like maybe the lights should be always on, the fridge given a high priority, the dishwasher not on, some circuits which could be cycled off to meet some other intermittent circuit's demand for power, and what order circuits could be killed off to maintain run time for the highest priority circuits.

    Of course, most houses aren't wired that sane. Even in parts of my house where new circuits were run from a new panel during remodeling, electricians are prone to tapping whatever's close for power. I demanded a 20A dedicated circuit for the entertainment center, but the junior guy didn't get the dedicated message and tapped it for two ceiling lights and a hallway outlet.

    I don't know how totally new construction is done, but I'm guessing its not done in a completely structured way except where code dictates dedicated circuits. But it would be great if there were individual circuits for lights by room, outlets by room, and then various specialty circuits for fridge or other items that should be addressed individually.

    1. Re:Where's the smart panel? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      individual circuits to be prioritized

      This can't be solved at the circuit level and is also precisely the point of the "smart appliances" that are so often shamed here on Slashdot. You can't just cut the power to a dishwasher, there may be reasons why it needs to run, also if it is running and you cut the power well that's it, you end up with half dirty dishes and a system stopped mid cycle that needs to start again.

      Better still, move towards some open standard where devices can share this information with each other, and then they can intelligently figure out what to do. My Nest already knows when I'm expected home so the dishwasher should be able to know both if I'm expected home shortly and if I'm no battery power. If I have oodles of power to spare and I'll be home in the next 30min it should keep running even if it is draining the battery. If I won't be home for another 6 hours, well it should stop itself.

      Smart homes need smart protocols, not turning circuits on and off. I hope we can get there someday.

      As for electrical codes, much of the world has things like lights daisy chained, and the move to LEDs means we can not put even more lights on a common circuit. Circuits are pretty much setup depending on max load, it's only when someone smart comes in and says something like please run separate circuit for the fridge so a ground fault somewhere else in the house doesn't cause me to get greeted by rotting meat when I get home. You won't find intelligence in wiring codes.

    2. Re:Where's the smart panel? by swb · · Score: 2

      He blamed it on his junior guy, but I saw it before the wallboard went up. I had two dedicated runs in the house and the "junior guy" flubbed both.

      He fixed both, but he didn't want to, "two lights and a mostly unused outlet won't consume much power". I finally had to tell him either it gets put the way I want it, or another electrician fixes it for him and that will be deducted from his bill.

    3. Re:Where's the smart panel? by swb · · Score: 2

      You can't just cut the power to a dishwasher, there may be reasons why it needs to run, also if it is running and you cut the power well that's it, you end up with half dirty dishes and a system stopped mid cycle that needs to start again.

      You *can* just cut the dishwasher, because the worst thing that can happen is you have to run the cycle again. Medical equipment and some life safety equipment can't be cut and when the power goes down and there has to be a way to prioritize it over dirty dishes.

      I'm with you on the ideal view that all things electrical should be able to talk to a power manager and be shut down individually, but I guess I don't see that as entirely realistic, either. Not everything can/will/should have a programmable networked controller in them nor will a universal open protocol everything supports come about anytime soon (if ever), so the next best thing is disabling branch circuits. I'd rather swap 30-odd circuit breakers for remote controllable ones than swap out every possible electrical thing I own that runs off of mains power.

      Killing branch circuits is crude, but it's a pretty easy way to prioritize consumption to maximize battery capacity. And unless you want to dedicate your garage to a battery array, prioritization is critical if you want something like a puny 14 kWh battery to be useful. When these batteries start hitting 150 kWh and can run the whole house for 3 days, we can worry less about prioritization.

    4. Re:Where's the smart panel? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      You *can* just cut the dishwasher, because the worst thing that can happen is you have to run the cycle again.

      The dishwasher is just an example but this is precisely what I'm getting at. You cut the power to the dishwasher to save energy requiring you to repeat a whole cycle? That's a silly idea, especially from a device that many people time for convenience sake so it's ready when it gets home. I agree if you have life saving medical equipment then you're not going to care if your dishes aren't done, but that's no reason to go back to the technological equivalent of bashing rocks together when the method of manufacturing a match is possible, especially if there's more intelligent options available. You don't see this as realistic yet that's precisely what is happening already. Look at Whirlpool's latest line of driers and washer, they use the Works With Nest API to switch to a really slow energy saving cycle if it detects you're not home and anticipates you won't be home for a long time. There's no reason batteries shouldn't or indeed wouldn't form part of Nest's ever expanding smart home offerings.

      By the way it's Saturday night now. We've been home all day. I've run 3 loads of washing, vacuumed, cleaned, run the dishwasher, 3 espressos including forgetting about one and having the coffee machine sit there going through it's full boiler heating cycle over and over again for 25 min, I've roasted a chicken for 50min at 190degC, while cooking rice in the microwave, and frying vegetables on the stove, I also had breakfast omlet which included another 10 minutes on the oven and 10min on the stove at full blast, and there's been 3 computers on the entire day, and at least 4 hours of TV watched. It's 10pm and I'm up to 10.44kWh of consumption. I don't think I could comprehend in what world you could consider a 14kWh system puny. It would be more than enough to run many houses off the grid. Actually during the workweek it would happily run our house for 3 days including cooking a stove based dinner (no long roasts).

      People don't need whopping big batteries, they just need smarter houses.

      Sidenote:
      I'm a bit into this because I had a work friend who lived off the grid who had this very problem. He'd get to his house after a long rainy week and find there was no diesel in the generator, generously (pun intended) drunk by the hot water system because the solar output was too low. I went through several iterations of varying usefulness to solve this problem, the first was your bashing rocks together approach. A current transformer off the solar feed cut out hot water system. Problem then was you get to where you're going to find a full tank of diesel but a cold shower that took several hours to heat. The real solution was more intelligent. I went with a mobile phone app along with a small internet connected box that will turn the heater on any time he travels down Bruce Hwy past a certain point. The three hours it takes him to get to where he's going gets him there to a nice hot shower and a full tank of diesel.

      The great thing about programmable / network based devices is the additional information you can pull in to make informed decisions. He said his heating system is on the way out and I recommend him a Nest. If he does go the Nest route, I'll convert his water heater to use the Works With Nest API to make the decision based on when the Nest expects him to arrive home.

  8. Re:Well that's one way to save your company by MrL0G1C · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Do it because Musk said so, even though he fails at everything he does"

    ROFL, what planet are you on!?!?!?!

    "As of June 2016, he has an estimated net worth of US$11.5 billion, making him the 83rd wealthiest person in the world.[22]"

    I wish I could fail that bad!

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  9. Heat and efficiency by Dan+East · · Score: 2

    I see one downside to this, which is heat. Counter intuitively, solar panels are less efficient the warmer they get. That is why solar panel installers always leave an air gap between panels and a roof, to allow airflow under the panels to help cool them. An air gap of 3-5" is recommended. When the panels (in the form of roofing tiles) are laid directly on the roof, not only is 50% of the surface area for cooling lost, but the heat of the attic is also warming them from the below. As anyone who has been on a hot roof in summer knows, roofing shingles get incredibly hot.

    This may be offset somewhat by the fact that these shingle style PV cells will cover more surface area of a roof than normal solar panels. However it is definitely a factor, and thus a given square footage of these new tiles cannot be as efficient as the same area of standard PV panels for the heat efficiency factor alone.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  10. Glass be laminated, yo... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    By their very nature, solar panels are plates of laminated glass or plastic reinforced with wires running through them.

    I.e. It's reinforced the same way bulletproof glass is.
    Where conventional tiles shatter into pieces, these tiles merely crack and dent.
    And the best part is, each solar plate being an array of parallelly connected cells - it will still function both as a roof tile and as a solar cell.
    Whereas a conventional tile would at that point be useful only as gravel substitute.

    Guy runs a company which puts rockets into space. Let's give him SOME benefit of the doubt on account of the engineering skills of his employees.
    You know... let's assume that they are not exactly TOTAL fuckups.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  11. Re:Stupid idea by Immerman · · Score: 2

    Sure, if you want cheap steel roofing. But he seems to be targetting upscale customers with this - just look at what he compares the tile's toughness to: terra cotta, clay, and slate roofing tiles. I'd bet good money that anyone who would consider *any* of those roofing options would be horrified at the suggestion of steel. Even copper is probably not that appealing to them.

    And hey, it makes sense - just like with automobiles, PCs, cell phones, etc., you target the first gen products at the wealthy. Hopefully within a decade or so we'll we'll see some nice PV propanel roofing that makes better sense for the middle class.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.