Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Unveils Residential 'Solar Roof' With Updated Battery Storage System (theverge.com)

Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk today unveiled the "residential roof" -- pegged as a roofing replacement -- with solar energy gathering powers. Unlike other solar systems which must be mounted on top of a traditional roof, these new panels are actually integrated within glass roof tiles, replacing a home's roof, Musk said. And because they're made of glass, Musk says they will last "quasi indefinitely," even in harsh conditions where snow and ice make short work of traditional asphalt shingles. Musk said that 50 years of lifespan should be no problem, and they offer efficiency that is 98 percent as good as a traditional, ugly photovoltaic panel. From a report on The Verge: There are a number of different versions of solar panels: Textured Glass Tile, Slate Glass Tile, Tuscan Glass Tile, and Smooth Glass Tile. Tesla says its glass tiles are much more durable than conventional roof tile -- something that's important in areas with risk of hail.The products are a "joint collaboration" between SolarCity and Tesla, according to SolarCity CEO Lyndon Rive. Tesla is attempting to acquire SolarCity for $2.6 billion and shareholders of both companies will vote on the proposed acquisition in the middle of November. The Powerwall 2 can store 14 kWh of energy, with a 5 kW continuous power draw, and 7 kW peak. The battery is warranted for unlimited power cycles for up to 10 years. It can be floor or wall mounted, inside or outside. It can be used for load shifting or back-up power. Musk says there are three parts to the solar energy solution: generation (solar panels), storage (batteries), and transportation (electric cars). Musk's plan is to sell all three of those products through Tesla.

149 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Guess what Elon has never seen by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TENNIS BALL-SIZED HAIL EXPECTED. Take Cover Now (and not under a glass roof, you dingus).

    1. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Had a friend buy a hail-damaged car. He'd heard about hail sales and was looking to buy at the time. We walked the lot after a hail storm. The damaged cars had lots of dents in the metal, but not a single broken glass. The Texas dealership said that was common. Glass designed to take it is quite strong. Even bulletproof.

    2. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by tofu2go · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it looks like Tesla has thought of that... apparently their "glass" tile is tougher than conventional tiles. See this CNET video for reference: https://youtu.be/uWcGRYT-aeE?t... If a conventional roof can withstand it, then so can theirs.

    3. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Interesting
      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      Too bad I am stuck in their fucking scam of a lease.

      Indeed. If you had been stuck in the lease of a scam then a lawyer could have collected huge fees on the aforementioned fuckage... you, however would have still just got the fuckage.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I purchased a hail damaged Accord in north Florida for $7K off the price and got a paintless dent repair guy to pull up the dents with a suction cup attached to a compressor for $500. Total win. You can't tell the car was damaged, at all.

    6. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Windows in the Pentagon survived better than the walls. As someone trying to snipe would likely use a window-shot to sight the target, the windows would survive most man-portable munitions, including small missiles. In "glass".

    7. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dabadab · · Score: 1

      It is pretty heavy though.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    8. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is actually quite irrelevant. Glass is weak and depends on it's structure to make it strong. The reason cars don't often suffer hail damage is due to the angle of incidence of the hail hitting the windows. Most damage is on the roof, bonnet, and boot (trunk for the America sedan owners), where the hail lands almost perpendicularly and can impart all of it's force into the thing it hits. By comparison window hits often happen at a very low incidence angle so only a tiny portion of the force is transferred into the glass. This is also why in a hail storm the most commonly damaged window by far is the front window despite also being the strongest of all windows in a car.

      Strength comes from structure. The reason solar panels are strong is because they are supported underneath. Glass (especially tempered glass) performs very well under compression. The strength comes not only from the glass, but the substrate behind it and the metal backing of the panel. A typical solar panel is far more durable than a sheet of tempered glass alone.

      Anecdote: I lived in a city with some ferocious hailstorms. Not just big round balls of hail, but irregular and sharp shaped blocks too. All of my solar panels survived. All of my neighbours' survived. All of our cars were completely written off and has massive amounts of damaged glass too (and in my case the inside turned into a bit of a swimming pool).

    9. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to make glass resilient because it can be laminated and pre-tensioned.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dbIII · · Score: 4, Informative

      Glass is very, very strong - which is why it is used in glass fibre reinforced plastic. It is however normally very brittle as in it can't absorb a lot of impact energy without cracking.
      If you add something to absorb the energy, such as a sandwich of plastic between layers of glass in a car's windscreen you end up with something that is tough enough to take some impacts without cracking.


      For a first year engineering materials practical I used to get students to load up horizontal glass rods with a lot of weight until they bowed a lot. You need a very smooth surface so that cracks won't start from tiny scratches, so that meant preparing with Hydrofluoric acid (don't try it at home!). That gave the students a bit of an insight into the difference between strength (maximum load) and toughness (energy which is proportional to the area under a curve of load versus extension).

    11. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is actually quite irrelevant. Glass is weak and depends on it's structure to make it strong.

      Is hail that big a problem for most people? I'm sure for some people it is, just like some people have to deal with tornadoes, and others have to deal with heat waves, and others flooding. But most people don't have to worry about them, and for them, this is great.

      BTW we get the odd hail storm here, in the lat 30 years we've had two big ones that were enough to break stuff, and even the it was only in some suburbs, not the entire city. So these rare cases would be covered by insurance. A small additional cost is still probably going to be cheaper than 30 years of paying electricity bills

    12. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by bgarcia · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    13. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      My old white '98 Grand Prix looked like a giant golf ball after a hail storm back around '99. The insurance company cut me a check for nearly $2k. In less than a year, all of the dents popped out on their own. You literally could not see a single dent.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    14. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Anecdotally, I've been through two hailstorms that were bad enough for the insurance company to replace the roof on my house. I think my insurance company hates me...the last one cost them over $30k.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    15. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's also a matter of scale - the metal panels of cars are quite thin compared to their glass. And then there's the classic flexible vs brittle contrast - metal will flex and permanently deform, while glass will flex and rebound - until it flexes so far that it shatters.

      Hit a glass panel with a big (fast) enough hailstone and it will break - it's just a matter of making the glass strong enough to survive the typical hailstones encountered within a 50 or 100 or 500 year period (depending on how much you are willing to pay now to not have to replace your roof later.)

      The fun part of this is changing weather patterns, how accurately can we predict the size and speed of hailstones 50 years from now? Since Elon's shingles are a brand new concept with essentially no competition, if he's got any class at all he'll over-design them so that they are more robust than they need to be. 15-20 years after they gain significant adoption in the marketplace, competition will shave their structural integrity down and down, saving a few cents on production costs in order to be the low price leader in the marketplace and simultaneously creating a shingle replacement labor market which actually costs far more than stronger (thicker) glass shingles that last twice as long would.

    16. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      There's also all kinds of hail - I used to get caught outside in Florida afternoon thunderstorms waiting to be picked up after school - those were usually more slush-balls than stones, though some of them were hard enough to bounce off the asphalt.

    17. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      If you're going to sell a premium product at a premium price, you'll have to do these kind of "toughness" demos to have any chance in the marketplace.

      Give it 20 years or so, when competing manufacturers enter the market they'll start cheaping out the panels until they last more or less just as long as "conventional" roofing.

    18. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It most certainly is. Tougher than Dacron anyway...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Could be even less. Our typical roof tiles last 40 years (mine are now at 75 years, and it's definitely time to replace), but solar panel output drops to a level where you need to replace them after 20 or so years. Longevity of the tiles isn't the issue, it's the dropping power output and the high cost of replacing the roof ever 20 years versus the cost of replacing the roof every 40 and separate panels every 20.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    20. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      The good news is that SC will allow you to upgrade to buying the roof. They will simply move the panels and equipment elsewhere.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    21. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bingo. I live on Colorado front range where we got golf ball size hail regularly. Thus summer our exposed hail resistant shingles failed with golf balls. Otoh, the Solar city panels? Not a scratch. Obviously the original poster has not a clue of what he is speaking.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    22. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by adolf · · Score: 1

      We get hail storms, tornadoes, heat waves, flooding, and blizzards here.

      After the last good wind storm it took over a year to get most of the asphalt shingled roofs all fixed. Glass roofs made out of photovoltaic panels will just make the problem worse.

    23. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Is hail that big a problem for most people?

      For most people in a given area frequented by hailstorms maybe :-)

      It certainly is a consideration in the parts of Australia I used to live in. I wouldn't give a second thought now though, mind you I wouldn't give it a first through either since the sun never shines where I live now.

    24. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Any plague of frogs or locusts?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    25. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      metal will flex and permanently deform

      Now there's a statement that has a whole lot of dependent variables.

    26. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Actually, it looks like Tesla has thought of that

      This is something the solar panel industry solved years ago.

    27. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > but solar panel output drops to a level where you need to replace them after 20 or so years.

      Citation? Solar panel output only drops about 0.5-7% a year. https://electrek.co/2016/07/04/solarcity-increase-useful-lifetime-of-solar-power-installations/

    28. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by burtosis · · Score: 2

      In the video there is a thick pillow/foam pad under each tile which greatly enhances impact resistance and yet won't be a part of any practical installation. They all failed including the tesla tile, though it looks like it might still provide some limited protection against water intrusion. The clay tile is a bit silly as you typically don't see many installations in heavy hail climates. Note that an asphalt tile, such as the majority of the United States is roofed with, would likely suffer little to no visible damage in this test and was omitted from it. Though after an impact like that the water repelling nature of an asphalt tile would likely be compromised.

      It will also be interesting to know the minimum slope that these can be applied on, and how practical they are on roof surfaces facing the wrong way.

      Que the home owners who buy this solar roofing and get it hail damaged then insurance companies won't replace it due to the increased cost. I doubt any insurance would cover it untill many lawsuits from outraged customers force changes.

    29. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Disclaimer: I work for a solar panel manufacturer.

      Our best prediction is that at least 99% of our panels will output at least 70% of their power after 40 years. Trying to get that out to 50 years now.

      Panel longevity and reduced output has come a long way.

    30. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course, the problem is that solar panels cost dar more in energy of making them (fabbing silicon, tossing sand in a furnace for the glass, etc.) than they ever will make in their lifetime. Solar panels have their place, but because it takes more energy to make them than they ever will give back, they are not a real energy source, but more of an advanced "battery", similar to a methanol fuel cell such as EFOY's offering.

    31. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Excellent compressive strength, shitty tensile strength: you don't need to worry about running over glass with your car's tires, for example; it'll just crumble.

    32. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think output of solar panels is still around 80% at the 20 years mark. The panels should last 30 years, albeit at a lower output

    33. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by pr0fessor · · Score: 2

      I was in a hail storm/tornado a few years back the tornado was an f4 and passed a little over a mile from my work. The baseball sized hail hit us though we had an open parking lot full of cars and I had to tackle a co-worker and hold her on the ground because she was determined to run outside and move her brand new mustang. Every car in the parking lot was totaled mine actually had upper parts of the frame that were bent and the roof was bent so far down that the metal split at the top where the front windshield had been. It looked more like the car had been hit with a sledge hammer than hail. Solar panels didn't survive that storm.

      We have a storms like that probably once every ten years it's why I have a garage and don't have solar panels.

    34. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by HiThere · · Score: 1

      A legitimate question was raised, though, of whether the panel could continue generating power afterwards. The claim was that after that exhibition the panel was severely cracked...and this might let in moisture which would corrode the internals.

      So you probably need to ensure this kind of damage is included in your home owner's insurance.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    35. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So the glass sunroof, offered no support from the sides or bottom, just the mounts on the edges, and is as perpendicular to the storm as the surfaces you mention, should have been damaged if glass was weak? But it wasn't. There were dents around the glass, but the glass was undamaged.

    36. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by hawk · · Score: 1

      You can't tell *yet*.

      Every layer of the paint suffered at least some damage at every dent, and will be partly detached from the metal underneath.

      These will rust *far* sooner than undamaged cars.

      Then again, $7k is more than enough for a really good paint job . . .

      hawk

    37. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by torkus · · Score: 1

      How long is the solar PV portion good for? PV degrades over time AFAIK so your design life is likely to be based on that.

      30 year PV? So design to withstand the 50-year storm.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    38. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      and yet, few sun/moon roofs or t-tops actually have glass broken from hail.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    39. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by macmurph · · Score: 3, Informative

      This isn't true. Even ten years ago an 18% efficient panel would be energy positive after about about 1.5 to 2.5 years anywhere in the lower 48 states. The Silevo polycrystalline cells used by SolarCity in this application are between 22 to 24% efficient. Then factor in that you don't need an underlying roof and the embodied energy goes down. Plus increased surface area of a tesla solar roof vs modules on the roof will mean that the embodied energy is amortized more rapidly as some tiles will be 'working' harder than others in areas that modules never would have been placed.

      The only thing that might make this system better is liquid cooling heat exchange or phase change material and/or maybe aerogel blanket beneath. Then the cell efficiency would go way up as the cells are cooled and hot water is generated for the building. Aerogel would insulate the roof. But all of that would add cost, complexity, and liability. In meantime SolarCity must focus on profit and a sustainable business model.

    40. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Socguy · · Score: 1

      That would tear a traditional roof apart. Good thing there's insurance...

    41. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by adolf · · Score: 2

      There were locusts at my mother's house a few years ago, in numbers rather short of a plague. They ate the swimming pool. They ate the vinyl siding. They ate the window screens.

      I wish I were making any of this up.

    42. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that SolarCity's hardware engineers are aware of the existence of hail, and have designed their solar panels to be adequately robust to handle it.

      Whether Elon is aware of the issue or not is irrelevant, since (reports to the contrary notwithstanding) he does not personally oversee every detail of every product.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    43. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Informative
      So far they don't know how long solar panels will last. There are solar cells from the 50-60's still producing power.

      The biggest problem for failure over the long term will be the framing, the racks, and the wiring. The cells themselves, absent stray rocks, will probably produces a useable amounts of power for over a hundred years. We are talking about he crystal/glass setups, not the plastic variety solar cells. Currently quite a few of the manufactures under promise the output of their cells so that they will still produce the rated amount of power for at least 20 years for their warranties. They seem to loose 5-10% of their output every decade or so.

    44. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "pull up the dents with a suction cup attached to a compressor for $500. Total win"

      I'm guessing that won't work as well with aluminum body panels. If Tesla use those for Model 3, the owners are going to be shocked as how much body work from even a small fender bender will cost them.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    45. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by haruchai · · Score: 1

      We get hail storms, tornadoes, heat waves, flooding, and blizzards here.

      After the last good wind storm it took over a year to get most of the asphalt shingled roofs all fixed. Glass roofs made out of photovoltaic panels will just make the problem worse.

      In $DEITY's name, where the hell do you live? WHY are you still living there?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    46. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      And the dirt and mildew and everything else that occurs on roofs that blocks sunlight.

    47. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I thought the Model 3 was supposed to be steel?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    48. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No.
      It's the flaws on the surface of the glass and it's brittleness that result in a low average tensile strength of a typical piece of glass. With a smooth surface, such as in glass fibres it is very, very strong, around 4 GPa while low end mild steel is one sixteenth as strong at 250MPa.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_fiber#Tensile

    49. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by Raistlin77 · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing above-ground swimming pool with vinyl liner.

    50. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Initially yes but later changed to a combination of the two. We'll have to wait & see what the final product contains; going to be quite the tradeoff between weight & ease of repair.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    51. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Anecdotally, I've been through two hailstorms that were bad enough for the insurance company to replace the roof on my house. I think my insurance company hates me...the last one cost them over $30k.

      No they love you, because for your $30k spend they get millions in premiums from everyone else that probably won't ever use/need hail coverage

    52. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 1

      You should move.

    53. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Is hail that big a problem for most people?

      For most people in a given area frequented by hailstorms maybe :-)

      But I'm guessing hail would also be a problem for cars and ceramic tiles, but I'll bet money people in your area still have those?

    54. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But I'm guessing hail would also be a problem for cars and ceramic tiles, but I'll bet money people in your area still have those?

      Indeed, we replace them frequently. I've had my roof patched up 3 times in 2 years, and I just live with my dinged up car because I boughtout the insurance write-off the first time. My partner on the other hand she's on first name basis with the panel beater because her workplace doesn't have undercover parking.

    55. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      A hail storm did about $300 million in damage this summer in Colorado Springs. Lots of car windows bit it, along with many, many shingles. http://gazette.com/gallery/572...

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    56. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's interesting. I recall some recent news on automotive sheet steel improvements that were supposed to decrease weight significantly, but I can't seem to find it now (I think the news was covered here as well). So I'm curious how this will pan out.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    57. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Several times I've seen somebody drop a water glass on a hard floor, and the first hit just sets the glass vibrating but doesn't break it. The second hit, the madly vibrating glass hits the floor again and it's all over. Usually just a fraction of a second - BANG CRASH tinkle.

    58. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Well, you can multiply that $30k by a couple hundred homes in my neighborhood alone.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    59. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      I would think that it would have been obvious that you have to clean them off once in a while. That is not degrading the solar cells ability to produce power, just blocking light from reaching them.

    60. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by adolf · · Score: 1

      They didn't test against asphalt shingles, which is the predominant type around here.

    61. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Well, you can multiply that $30k by a couple hundred homes in my neighborhood alone.

      You know how insurance works right? All costs are covered by the premiums. In the event of a disaster, premiums go up, and when there is no disaster they stay up. The insurance industry feeds on disasters as a source of regular income.

    62. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Um, no. My premiums didn't go up after either incident. As for knowing how insurance works, I rely on my kid who did a three yr LDP program at GEICO.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    63. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Um, no. My premiums didn't go up after either incident.

      I have my insurance statements for the last 20 years. They go up every year regardless of what happens, so your case seems highly unusual.

    64. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      You insinuated that they were going up because of the disaster, not simple inflation. There's a difference.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    65. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Obvious, perhaps - factored into TCO? Probably not. Cleaning high pitch roofs (as would be good solar collectors in upper latitudes) is non-trivial work, ergo costly.

      Lower pitch roofs can be walked on and thus more easily cleaned, but walking on glass? I know it's not recommended for ceramic tile.

      Leaves piled on a solar collector may actually extend its ability to produce power, by protecting it from the harmful rays of the sun, but it's not adding value to its output.

    66. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by Gussington · · Score: 1

      You insinuated that they were going up because of the disaster, not simple inflation. There's a difference.

      But the figures rise faster than inflation. The increased costs are merely drip fed to enure the frog stays in the pot.
      If premiums didn't rise to cover disasters, then a disaster would bankrupt every insurance compnay. Since this is not happening, we know that they must be covering the costs adequately.

    67. Re: Guess what Elon has never seen by Nickodeimus · · Score: 1

      depends on the size of the roof, no?

    68. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by almitydave · · Score: 1

      We get hail storms, tornadoes, heat waves, flooding, and blizzards here.

      In $DEITY's name, where the hell do you live? WHY are you still living there?

      That describes a huge portion of the central USA and Canada. I live in Chicago, we get all of that. When I lived in LA we had earthquakes, mudslides, fires, riots, kale shortages, etc. In Florida it was hurricanes, flooding, lightning storms, and elderly drivers. Every place has its disasters.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    69. Re:Guess what Elon has never seen by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "kale shortages"? In California? That sounds like the onset of the Apocalypse.
      But I'm guessing quality solar panels can stand up to all that, except the old fogeys behind the wheel & the lack of kale.
      That said, I think the real important announcement Elon Musk made was about the improved PowerWall, not the suspiciously-lacking-in-details-solar-shingles.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  2. Re:Well that's one way to save your company by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

    Yup, failed so hard Tesla turned a profit!

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  3. Re:Well that's one way to save your company by LS · · Score: 1

    > even though he fails at everything he does

    and I'm sure you succeed at masturbating excessively in your dark basement.

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  4. Re:Step 1 by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

    Ideas are a dime a dozen. Without any return there's no motivation for capital to pay for development into the products that are actually valuable. Don't get me wrong, I support open source as much as the next guy but paid innovation has an important roll to fill for all the people out there who are rich and want to stay that way while still contributing. We're not in the Star Trek universe yet.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  5. 1.21 jigawatts! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    The Powerwall 2 can store 14 kWh of energy

    In other words, they've improved it from storing $1 worth of electricity to $1.40. But you still need to cycle it many thousands of times with FREE electricity before it breaks even.

    1. Re: 1.21 jigawatts! by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  6. woohoo by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

    Let me start by saying that I'm very eager for this sort of thing. But not yet, economically. Bless you early adopters, keep it up.

    Musk says there are four to five million new roofs built each year in the US, and the solar roof product will be price competitive with more traditional roofs with solar added to it. However, existing roofs which do not need to be replaced will be better candidates for more traditional roof-mounted solar solutions.

    Translation: 137 year ROI.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:woohoo by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There have been a few products of this type such as some in the UK. Tesla are not the early adopters and neither will be their customers. I think it will get cheaper though just as the panels did once some huge factories came online.

    2. Re:woohoo by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. it's 98% as good as something you could slap in any place in any angle you want.

      with this you need to ORIENT YOUR HOUSE.

      oh well, at least it's a better product than their previous.. or wait, are they installing the lithium batteries in the roof? I sure hope not.

      the battery pack that came with no charger and no inverter by default was a pretty shoddy thing. Musk is grasping for extra funding and selling shares like crazy.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:woohoo by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In that case you use something else that is not a roof tile if you want this sort of thing. It's not the fucking USSR with a single choice of product.
      Just because Musk is doing this (and he's not the first) doesn't make it a bad idea.

  7. This is a long time coming. by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    Only probs is that while everyone knew about solar roofs, one jerk patented it insuring no one would make them. Basically at this point, anything is better than regular shingles even if it doesn't make electricity. If you can find a legal way of doing solar roofs, that saves the customer every 35 years they need to replace.

    1. Re: This is a long time coming. by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

      Another place this will be good is in prefab double wides. If when they manufacture trailors for the middle and lower class, if they have solar preinstalled with a longer lasting roof, that could be good as long as the cost is reasonable.

  8. quasi-infinite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "quasi indefinitely," even in harsh conditions where snow and ice make short work of traditional asphalt shingles. Musk said that 50 years of lifespan should be no problem

    Europe has buildings with 1000 year old roofs, and it is somehow a little bit amusing to hear 50 years referred to as "quasi infinite".

    1. Re:quasi-infinite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I doubt there are many 1000 year old roofs here in Europe. But 200-300 year old ceramic roof tiles are not that uncommon. Modern quality ceramic roof tiles should last for around 100 years.
      In fact, if I look out of the window around 50% of the roofs I see are older than 40 years.

    2. Re:quasi-infinite? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Are they really 1000 years old? Or have they been maintained over the centuries. Filling cracks, replacing broken parts. I expect you will see roof maintenance at least a couple time a century.
      The standard home in the north east us is the sick built home with shingle roofs that last about 30 years. These homes while not meant to last a century are comfortable and do the tick for the price.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  9. Cue the oil trolls in 3...2...1 by hyades1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As long as Musk isn't paying people to install it and paying them to accept the free power, we'll have the Global Warming deniers and their buddies complaining about this...and their lobbyists trying to have it made illegal.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Cue the oil trolls in 3...2...1 by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      I hear that oil companies really know how to grease palms...

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Cue the oil trolls in 3...2...1 by gregraven · · Score: 1

      I'm certain the government will figure out some way to sink money into this, but the better way to piss off the Global Warming deniers is to actually have some Global Warming. http://realclimatescience.com/

      --
      Greg Raven
      As long as there's any left, I'll take mine first.
    3. Re:Cue the oil trolls in 3...2...1 by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Nice to see the trolls and their tinfoil hat denier website appear right on cue.

      We honest people have been expecting you.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  10. Verge of being cost effective by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Powerwall 2 can store 14 kWh of energy

    In other words, they've improved it from storing $1 worth of electricity to $1.40. But you still need to cycle it many thousands of times with FREE electricity before it breaks even.

    A quick search shows that the average household electricity usage is about 10K kWh per year (900-ish per month), ranging from 14K in Louisiana to 6K in Hawaii.

    Using your numbers, that would be roughly $1000/yr. The powerwall costs roughly $7000 installed with inverter and other extras, or you can lease it for 9 years for $5,000 which includes installation, a maintenance agreement, the electrical inverter and control systems.

    Tesla is offering a ten year warranty on the batteries, and there's some discussion about how a battery can last for 3650 cycles (mostly because the 14K powerwall is a 20K battery pack that's discharged much more shallowly than if it was an actual 14K battery, and other tricks).

    The total cost comes out to about 0.15/kWh.

    "Tentative Conclusion: The battery is right on the verge of being cost effective to buy across most of the US for day/night arbitrage. And it’s even more valuable if outages come at a high economic cost."

    1. Re:Verge of being cost effective by Kjella · · Score: 1

      My math says 14 kWh * 365 cycles = 5110 kWh and $5000 / 9 years / 5110 kWh works out to $0.11/kWh. That however assumes it has a source that can fill it up every day and you use it completely every day. With solar that is unlikely as in the summer the main consumer is AC which correlates well with when the sun is up and you'll probably not use 14 kWh every evening. In the winter when it's dark and cold and snowing can you still get 14 kWh? Unlikely.

      If you try for mixing with online power to increase utilization you must decide how much to charge at night before you know how much solar you'll get during the day so it's full by evening. That sounds like a micromanagement nightmare based on tomorrow's sunrise/sunset/weather forecast. If you're doing it purely for the arbitrage you're competing against a power company that could just as easily store it on their end and raise prices or if demand by night goes up because of people like you, so I doubt you'll ever win.

      If you're doing it to give your house a giant UPS and using the differential to offset much of the cost that might be useful. That said its usefulness will then depend on the depletion when power fails, if the power fails exactly when you're down to 0% and starting the night's charge cycle it's worth nothing. And it's likely to be in times of hard use like a strong winter cold you really need that backup. If you want the full 14 kWh to always be available in reserve you can't really use it at all but you can pick anywhere between.

      You could put it in line with a diesel generator, so it's doing work while on "standby" and the lower the charge, the quicker you start the generator. But then it becomes a question of how often and how much and won't just the generator do the trick, obviously charging a battery makes it more efficient but if it's an emergency solution you use once a year that might not matter much. And I assume there's already better integrated solutions for this, because they don't fit in Musk's green sales pitch.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Verge of being cost effective by digitect · · Score: 1

      You've suggested an interesting value add by integrating a generator. Combined with the Tesla battery system, the home's electrical power quality suddenly becomes UPS grade.

      It seems obvious, but I don't hear Tesla touting their system as a component in better power, only green.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    3. Re:Verge of being cost effective by digitect · · Score: 1

      10K kWh per year reads better to those unfamiliar with electrical units as 10,000,000 Watts per year. When put in "light bulb" terms, people start to get just how much electrical power a single US home uses. Staggering.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    4. Re:Verge of being cost effective by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 2

      "Tentative Conclusion: The battery is right on the verge of being cost effective to buy across most of the US for day/night arbitrage. And itâ(TM)s even more valuable if outages come at a high economic cost."

      Except that as the prevalence of storage becomes higher, the day/night arbitrage gets lower and so the cost effectiveness of storage goes down.

      California has already hit this for solar, the peak load on the system is now right after dark when the solar cuts out and people get home and turn on their gadgets. People that bought panels and computed the lifetime cost curve based on the old peak plans are now never going to recoup their investment.

    5. Re:Verge of being cost effective by Kremmy · · Score: 1

      10 cents per kilowatt hour is the cheapest rate you'll find anywhere. That calculation is based on getting the cheapest possible power over the wire. Literally everywhere else in the world, the viability equation returns a solid YES.

    6. Re:Verge of being cost effective by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      There is no day/night arbitrage for residential customers.

      Yes there is. And not just in California or the Southwest. I'm in the Midwest, and my daytime price is 9.45 cents per KWh while my nighttime price is 7.5 cents per KWh.

      Of course with prices like that, I'll be one of the last customers in the country for which a Tesla Powerwall makes economic sense. Still, I could arbitrage.

    7. Re:Verge of being cost effective by vandamme · · Score: 1

      If your generator also heats your house, figure that in and it's looking better.

    8. Re:Verge of being cost effective by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      A quick search [eia.gov] shows that the average household electricity usage is about 10K kWh per year (900-ish per month), ranging from 14K in Louisiana to 6K in Hawaii.

      How?

      That's 30 kWh per day in the worst case, and 17 kWh daily in Hawaii.

      What do you spend all that electricity on?

      I honestly don't understand.

      Europe is at a rough average of 3K kWh per year across its countries, and that's driven up by a lot of electrical heating (which Europe requires a lot more of than Hawaii).

    9. Re:Verge of being cost effective by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I've got a poorly insulated house in a pretty warm part of the USA and my electric usage gets up around 2K KWh during the hotter parts of the year. We keep the thermostat set in the low 70's so we're not trying for meat locker temperatures or anything. While I live in a warm area there are some much hotter localities that probably have houses with just as poor of an insulation value, if not worse.

      I would expect that people in the US also just use more electricity in a wasteful manner than people do elsewhere because it is relatively cheap. I could be mistaken but I believe the average home is larger in the US than elsewhere. My power bill tops out around $250 during the hottest parts of the year but that is only a few months while most of the time it's around $150. Compared to my wages the electric bill is minor enough that I'm not very interested in taking action to reduce it. I could spend $10,000 putting in new windows, but even if by some miracle they reduced my power bill by 20%, and my power bill was always at that peak amount, it'd take 13 years to pay back its cost.

  11. Re:Well that's one way to save your company by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    If he had solar panels maybe he'd be able to turn on the light.

  12. Re:Interconnects by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    You wire them up in series and parallel, power them in parallel, with diagnostics, and in series to deliver power.

    When one fails, it will light up red, or something like that. If it's too dead to self-identify, every panel on the roof, other than the broken one, glows green. A simple fix, any idiot could think of. But you aren't smart enough to be an idiot, and you are so insane, you think that billions of dollars of engineering wouldn't think of that, or a way to address it.

  13. Re:Interconnects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You wire them up in series and parallel, power them in parallel, with diagnostics, and in series to deliver power.

    When one fails, it will light up red, or something like that. If it's too dead to self-identify, every panel on the roof, other than the broken one, glows green. A simple fix, any idiot could think of. But you aren't smart enough to be an idiot, and you are so insane, you think that billions of dollars of engineering wouldn't think of that, or a way to address it.

    You just doubled the cabling complexity and added thousands of electronic devices on the roof. Each device has to last decades with a temperature range from -20C to + 80C. Your diagnostic devices will fail far more often then the solar shingle contact.

    I personally installed around 10 solar roofs with 3 different solar roof systems (Solrif, Megasol Nicer, Solarmarkt Arres). It's about experience, and my experience tells me, Tesla's solar roof will not be cost effective.
    Sure If you have a Model S, a Model Roadster and 2 Powerwalls in your garage you can afford a solar roof.

    The holy grail of solar PV isn't a shine nice roof, but generate electricty cheaper than coal.

  14. How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by rbrander · · Score: 1

    The powerwall is all cool-looking and compact, but I don't actually budget a lot for fashion statements in my basic infrastructure.

    I see that wal-mart sells "deep discharge marine batteries" that hold about 1kWh for $99. So that's $1400 to duplicate a powerwall's storage. I guess if a powerwall can take over 4X as many cycles as lead acid, it wins. For solar and daily cycling. (My interest is getting through The Big One with a $500 generator that doesn't have to be on 24H a day, so I think the cheaper solution is the win.)

    1. Re:How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      Li-ion batteries still suck, but lead acid suck at least 10 times as much!

    2. Re:How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by swb · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think lead acid isn't terrible if you have the space, but really to get the most life out of a lead acid battery you have to look at max discharge as about 60% even using absorbed glass mat (AGM) batteries to get anything like long life cycles.

      So your 1 kWh battery is only really useful for about 400 Wh which means you need 35 of them.

      But it's more complicated than that, as you'd be better off driving an inverter at 48v and using something like 6v golf cart type batteries arranged in series/parallel strings to get to 48v and probably want some kind of more sophisticated charging/monitoring system to keep track of individual batteries and be able to isolate 48v groups if a unit failed. Usually more individual batteries gets you higher aggregate discharge rates since you pull less from any one battery.

      I don't think it's impossible to built a decent setup, but doing it right will end up being more expensive than you'd think and will end up sucking a ton of space.

      I think the half assed compromise is probably 4x 8D AGM 12v batteries in a 24v series/parallel combination, which would get you close to 14 kWh. But the batteries alone are $2k and then the inverter more yet.

    3. Re:How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by hparker · · Score: 1

      Your calculations are off by over a factor of 4 because just as the Tesla batteries don't use their full capacity to maintain their 10 year life (they are really 20 KWh batteries used fractionally to produce 14 Kh) lead acid batteries only last if you use less than 50% of their capacity each day, and then they may last 5 years.

      So you will need to buy at least 28KWh of lead acid X 2 to equal 1 Tesla Power wall for a total lead acid cost of $5600 plus the cost of battery chargers, and monthly maintenance (topping off the water, etc.) to equal one $5000 leased, maintenance free Powerwall, and have a ventilated place in your house to keep the 28 monster batteries and associated power management boxes and cables.

    4. Re:How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Lead acid batteries are normally closer to $400/kWh(B), but some get lower. The factors you are missing though are:
      -Limited to about 300 cycles at full discharge or 1,000 at 50% discharge.
      -Lower cost batteries have lower round-trip efficiency
      -Physically much larger and heavier
      -Charge/discharge rate ratio is much worse

    5. Re:How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      BTW, for the Big One, you are better off with 4-6 12V/200Ah lead acid and portable generator. Ideally two generators, one that you test and service every month and one that has never been used...

      I am still surprised that nobody mass markets a refrigerator UPS that can provide 24 hours backup for the fridge, plus 100W for basic home electronics, with built-in inputs for utility and a portable generator.

    6. Re:How does powerwall beat lead-acid? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Why would you need a refrigerator UPS when you can simply store heat (or the lack of it) by freezing a suitable medium, such as ordinary water? 1 kWh of heat storage is much cheaper than 1 kWh of electricity storage. Assuming a coefficient of performance of 4:1 for the refrigerator heat pumping, 40 kg of water replace 1 kWh of electricity consumption. This is much cheaper than 1 kWh in quality batteries. Anyway, an ordinary modern fridge has no more than ~50W of average consumption. Mine has about twenty watts, I think.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  15. Re:Interconnects by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    You don't have to connect all the tiles, you prefab them in 2x2, 3x3, 5x5 blocks, already interconnected. Or maybe in rows. So you only have to use single tiles at the edges or around windows.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  16. Where's the smart panel? by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the PowerWall would be most useful with a smart panel that allowed individual circuits to be prioritized in various ways when running off battery power to maximize run time.

    Like maybe the lights should be always on, the fridge given a high priority, the dishwasher not on, some circuits which could be cycled off to meet some other intermittent circuit's demand for power, and what order circuits could be killed off to maintain run time for the highest priority circuits.

    Of course, most houses aren't wired that sane. Even in parts of my house where new circuits were run from a new panel during remodeling, electricians are prone to tapping whatever's close for power. I demanded a 20A dedicated circuit for the entertainment center, but the junior guy didn't get the dedicated message and tapped it for two ceiling lights and a hallway outlet.

    I don't know how totally new construction is done, but I'm guessing its not done in a completely structured way except where code dictates dedicated circuits. But it would be great if there were individual circuits for lights by room, outlets by room, and then various specialty circuits for fridge or other items that should be addressed individually.

    1. Re:Where's the smart panel? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      individual circuits to be prioritized

      This can't be solved at the circuit level and is also precisely the point of the "smart appliances" that are so often shamed here on Slashdot. You can't just cut the power to a dishwasher, there may be reasons why it needs to run, also if it is running and you cut the power well that's it, you end up with half dirty dishes and a system stopped mid cycle that needs to start again.

      Better still, move towards some open standard where devices can share this information with each other, and then they can intelligently figure out what to do. My Nest already knows when I'm expected home so the dishwasher should be able to know both if I'm expected home shortly and if I'm no battery power. If I have oodles of power to spare and I'll be home in the next 30min it should keep running even if it is draining the battery. If I won't be home for another 6 hours, well it should stop itself.

      Smart homes need smart protocols, not turning circuits on and off. I hope we can get there someday.

      As for electrical codes, much of the world has things like lights daisy chained, and the move to LEDs means we can not put even more lights on a common circuit. Circuits are pretty much setup depending on max load, it's only when someone smart comes in and says something like please run separate circuit for the fridge so a ground fault somewhere else in the house doesn't cause me to get greeted by rotting meat when I get home. You won't find intelligence in wiring codes.

    2. Re:Where's the smart panel? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I demanded a 20A dedicated circuit for the entertainment center, but the junior guy didn't get the dedicated message and tapped it for two ceiling lights and a hallway outlet.

      More likely the actual electrician just said to himself "f*ck this idiot and his pointless demands".

    3. Re:Where's the smart panel? by swb · · Score: 2

      He blamed it on his junior guy, but I saw it before the wallboard went up. I had two dedicated runs in the house and the "junior guy" flubbed both.

      He fixed both, but he didn't want to, "two lights and a mostly unused outlet won't consume much power". I finally had to tell him either it gets put the way I want it, or another electrician fixes it for him and that will be deducted from his bill.

    4. Re:Where's the smart panel? by swb · · Score: 2

      You can't just cut the power to a dishwasher, there may be reasons why it needs to run, also if it is running and you cut the power well that's it, you end up with half dirty dishes and a system stopped mid cycle that needs to start again.

      You *can* just cut the dishwasher, because the worst thing that can happen is you have to run the cycle again. Medical equipment and some life safety equipment can't be cut and when the power goes down and there has to be a way to prioritize it over dirty dishes.

      I'm with you on the ideal view that all things electrical should be able to talk to a power manager and be shut down individually, but I guess I don't see that as entirely realistic, either. Not everything can/will/should have a programmable networked controller in them nor will a universal open protocol everything supports come about anytime soon (if ever), so the next best thing is disabling branch circuits. I'd rather swap 30-odd circuit breakers for remote controllable ones than swap out every possible electrical thing I own that runs off of mains power.

      Killing branch circuits is crude, but it's a pretty easy way to prioritize consumption to maximize battery capacity. And unless you want to dedicate your garage to a battery array, prioritization is critical if you want something like a puny 14 kWh battery to be useful. When these batteries start hitting 150 kWh and can run the whole house for 3 days, we can worry less about prioritization.

    5. Re:Where's the smart panel? by SNRatio · · Score: 1

      It would probably be better to have the appliances themselves do the load balancing as opposed to the circuits. As long as we are going to end up with an internet of things, have the house stagger when the AC and refrigerator compressors start up and turn off the electric oven/range and water heaters for a few seconds whenever a big motor starts up as well. That way when someone hacks your house they can burn out your batteries, inverter, HVAC, and refrigerator by turning on everything in the house at the same time!

    6. Re:Where's the smart panel? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      You *can* just cut the dishwasher, because the worst thing that can happen is you have to run the cycle again.

      The dishwasher is just an example but this is precisely what I'm getting at. You cut the power to the dishwasher to save energy requiring you to repeat a whole cycle? That's a silly idea, especially from a device that many people time for convenience sake so it's ready when it gets home. I agree if you have life saving medical equipment then you're not going to care if your dishes aren't done, but that's no reason to go back to the technological equivalent of bashing rocks together when the method of manufacturing a match is possible, especially if there's more intelligent options available. You don't see this as realistic yet that's precisely what is happening already. Look at Whirlpool's latest line of driers and washer, they use the Works With Nest API to switch to a really slow energy saving cycle if it detects you're not home and anticipates you won't be home for a long time. There's no reason batteries shouldn't or indeed wouldn't form part of Nest's ever expanding smart home offerings.

      By the way it's Saturday night now. We've been home all day. I've run 3 loads of washing, vacuumed, cleaned, run the dishwasher, 3 espressos including forgetting about one and having the coffee machine sit there going through it's full boiler heating cycle over and over again for 25 min, I've roasted a chicken for 50min at 190degC, while cooking rice in the microwave, and frying vegetables on the stove, I also had breakfast omlet which included another 10 minutes on the oven and 10min on the stove at full blast, and there's been 3 computers on the entire day, and at least 4 hours of TV watched. It's 10pm and I'm up to 10.44kWh of consumption. I don't think I could comprehend in what world you could consider a 14kWh system puny. It would be more than enough to run many houses off the grid. Actually during the workweek it would happily run our house for 3 days including cooking a stove based dinner (no long roasts).

      People don't need whopping big batteries, they just need smarter houses.

      Sidenote:
      I'm a bit into this because I had a work friend who lived off the grid who had this very problem. He'd get to his house after a long rainy week and find there was no diesel in the generator, generously (pun intended) drunk by the hot water system because the solar output was too low. I went through several iterations of varying usefulness to solve this problem, the first was your bashing rocks together approach. A current transformer off the solar feed cut out hot water system. Problem then was you get to where you're going to find a full tank of diesel but a cold shower that took several hours to heat. The real solution was more intelligent. I went with a mobile phone app along with a small internet connected box that will turn the heater on any time he travels down Bruce Hwy past a certain point. The three hours it takes him to get to where he's going gets him there to a nice hot shower and a full tank of diesel.

      The great thing about programmable / network based devices is the additional information you can pull in to make informed decisions. He said his heating system is on the way out and I recommend him a Nest. If he does go the Nest route, I'll convert his water heater to use the Works With Nest API to make the decision based on when the Nest expects him to arrive home.

    7. Re:Where's the smart panel? by swb · · Score: 1

      I don't think I could comprehend in what world you could consider a 14kWh system puny.

      My electric bill in July was 1900 kWh. 14 wouldn't get me 6 hours that month.

    8. Re:Where's the smart panel? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The Jevons paradox in action. Since your electricity is very cheap, you've never attempted to seriously reduce its use.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Where's the smart panel? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Wholy shit man you need a smart home more than I ever imagined :)

    10. Re:Where's the smart panel? by pbhenson · · Score: 1

      If it was in the contract to do it that way, it should have been done that way, regardless of whether he thought it needed to be done that way. And if he didn't do it the way the contract specified it be done, he should have fixed it without bitching about it, regardless of whether he thought it was worth it. If he didn't want to do it that way he should have discussed it before the contract was signed or not taken the contract. Doing it a cheaper way, on purpose or not, and then trying to weasel out of making it right is dishonest plain and simple.

  17. Soon to be illegal in Florida. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Sadly the power companies and lobbyists in Florida are trying to make home solar illegal. and the populace is far too stupid to vote it down.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Soon to be illegal in Florida. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's that all the republican politicians down here are in bead with the corporations.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Re:Well that's one way to save your company by MrL0G1C · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Do it because Musk said so, even though he fails at everything he does"

    ROFL, what planet are you on!?!?!?!

    "As of June 2016, he has an estimated net worth of US$11.5 billion, making him the 83rd wealthiest person in the world.[22]"

    I wish I could fail that bad!

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  19. Re:Well that's one way to save your company by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    > even though he fails at everything he does

    and I'm sure you succeed at masturbating excessively in your dark basement.

    How many times is "excessively"?

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  20. FINALLY! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    The solar power part is nice and all but best part is that now I can finally throw stones inside my glass house! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  21. Dead Firemen by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    When one or two firemen are electrocuted fighting a blaze this stuff will be gone - or the flipside, no insurance company will cover your home as the fire department will not go up on the roof. Heck, that may happen even with more traditional panels sooner than later.

    With earlier model panels, it was sufficient to have a cutoff near ground level as they were not efficient enough to still be a major risk. Apparently not any more. Firefighters are also nervous about going up on a roof that is overweighted.

    I am not a fireman but have spoken to quite a few in an effort to make policy for my HOA after we were legally mandated to allow solar installations. Too little thought is put into the many ramifications of solar panels, especially in attached homes.

  22. Heat and efficiency by Dan+East · · Score: 2

    I see one downside to this, which is heat. Counter intuitively, solar panels are less efficient the warmer they get. That is why solar panel installers always leave an air gap between panels and a roof, to allow airflow under the panels to help cool them. An air gap of 3-5" is recommended. When the panels (in the form of roofing tiles) are laid directly on the roof, not only is 50% of the surface area for cooling lost, but the heat of the attic is also warming them from the below. As anyone who has been on a hot roof in summer knows, roofing shingles get incredibly hot.

    This may be offset somewhat by the fact that these shingle style PV cells will cover more surface area of a roof than normal solar panels. However it is definitely a factor, and thus a given square footage of these new tiles cannot be as efficient as the same area of standard PV panels for the heat efficiency factor alone.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Heat and efficiency by NonUniqueNickname · · Score: 1

      Some manufacturers incorporate water cooling pipes into their solar panels. Keeps the PV cells cool and efficient. Produces hot water which is usually a welcome side-effect. Tesla's shingles don't have water cooling yet, but I'm sure it will come.

    2. Re:Heat and efficiency by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I live in New York, so I'll pass on the water cooled tiles.

  23. Glass be laminated, yo... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    By their very nature, solar panels are plates of laminated glass or plastic reinforced with wires running through them.

    I.e. It's reinforced the same way bulletproof glass is.
    Where conventional tiles shatter into pieces, these tiles merely crack and dent.
    And the best part is, each solar plate being an array of parallelly connected cells - it will still function both as a roof tile and as a solar cell.
    Whereas a conventional tile would at that point be useful only as gravel substitute.

    Guy runs a company which puts rockets into space. Let's give him SOME benefit of the doubt on account of the engineering skills of his employees.
    You know... let's assume that they are not exactly TOTAL fuckups.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  24. Re:Interconnects by shilly · · Score: 1

    The whole frigging point of Tesla's approach is to generate the next level of scale to drive down costs. Rather than do bespoke installations for a few hundred clients, they're looking to do tens to hundreds of thousands for lots of customers. That means anticipating and solving every problem you care to dream up and throw at this: complexity vs redundancy, damage, fire, expense, poor quality installations, installation time, etc etc. Everything. They are obviously going to share only a tiny fraction of their approach in public, because that is invaluable IP they're developing. But you're being very naive if you think you've come up with a question they've not considered and where necessary addressed.

  25. Tesla Unveils Residential 'Solar Roof' With Updat by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

    Here we go again . . . Solar (really good - but expensive) being touted as the wave of the future.

    SURE it's good - - - Sure it's Green - - - Sure it's the future of small-scale (home) power

    SURE IT's EXPENSIVE

    When it drops in cost to the 'average' wage earner level (becoming lower every year) then it will be the right thing to do. Until the rapidly shrinking 'middle class' can budget this technology into their lifestyle, then it's just gonna' be another "Look - I'm Green and Mean" showcase issue for the 10-percenters (not much larger than the 1-percenters), since the income earners are outpacing the 'poor old average Joe' by several percentage points every quarter.

    With banks crediting savings at 1 percent (or less), but charging 10 percent (or more) for loans - it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the middle-man is just totally screwed !

    Really kinda' sucks, but that's life in the world we live in run by corporations / bankers / institutionalized graft.

    --
    redneck geek
  26. Re:Merger not even approved by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Yes the tie-in to the merger in the announcement is pretty silly, I don't see any reason why this product can't be produced and sold without it.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  27. Glass strength and size of panel matter by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Having regular tile sized pieces of glass will be much tougher than windshield sized pieces due to the decreased bending forces and underlying support structures.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  28. Produce elctricity after cracking? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    The Tesla glass tile did have multiple cracks after the kettlebell dropped. I doubt it will produce electricty, or much of it after a crack.

    I wonder what the weight will be for roof support loads.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  29. Dow Chemical tried this... by skelly33 · · Score: 1

    Should be interesting to see how well Tesla fares with this. Dow Chemical put a lot of money behind the same concept (less the battery whose purpose vs. cost seem like they would be difficult to justify) and they gave up the market due both to technical complications of installation/maintenance and poor sales due to low market interest. And that was just a few months ago, so I doubt much has changed: https://www.greentechmedia.com...

  30. Re:Produce elctricity after cracking? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    I still think it's a great idea though, and would love to put it on my house.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  31. Re:Stupid idea by Immerman · · Score: 2

    Sure, if you want cheap steel roofing. But he seems to be targetting upscale customers with this - just look at what he compares the tile's toughness to: terra cotta, clay, and slate roofing tiles. I'd bet good money that anyone who would consider *any* of those roofing options would be horrified at the suggestion of steel. Even copper is probably not that appealing to them.

    And hey, it makes sense - just like with automobiles, PCs, cell phones, etc., you target the first gen products at the wealthy. Hopefully within a decade or so we'll we'll see some nice PV propanel roofing that makes better sense for the middle class.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  32. Re:Stupid idea by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Metal roofs are notorious for poor thermal properties, so if you plan a metal roof, plan on lots of insulation under it. It might still save you a lot of money, though.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  33. Ovshinsky Innovations & ECD by Feneric · · Score: 1

    ECD had solar shingles back in the '90s, and the work Stan Ovshinsky was doing improved both their average productivity and durability significantly while reducing production cost. After he retired though the company went downhill and eventually went out of business. How does the new Tesla offering compare to the Ovshinksky offerings from a decade or two ago?

  34. Re:Interconnects by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Based on other comments, his intention isn't to replace existing roofs, but to get added to new construction. Don't know how well that will work, or if that's really his intent, but if removes the GPs points from significance.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  35. Re: Well that's one way to save your company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You stupid ass, you think I used Edison as an example here by random chance? Musk is more Edison than he is Tony Stark. He employs the best and brightest and takes credit for their work, yes, but he's producing things that actually work, and understands Edisons' methods: Failure is not failure, it's a datapoint showing what didn't work, so you can improve on the next attempt. Then there's butthurt shits like you who throw a fit when you fail and give up. That's why you're an Anonymous Coward posting on an obscure internet pseudo-news site running some unknown shitty 'company', probably out of your garage, which has no future and no inspiration other than you're likely unemployable in any real job, or just so shitty at what you do that you keep getting laid off. Come back when you're willing to tell us your real name and the name of your 'company' and have some actual innovation and success to show us, otherwise you're just piss and vinegar and massive butthurt stamping your feet like a spoiled 2 year old because the other kids are winning and you're losing.

  36. Re:Interconnects by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    My solar array has a seperate Entech inverter mounted on each panel so called micro inverters, allowing every panel,in the array to produce full power when others do not.
    String inverters that control series combinations of panels are so last century.

  37. Ill take the roof, you can keep the house. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    The only downside to these roofs is that they are of higher quality than the homes they would be going on. Most of the houses built these days are slapped together monstrosities that aren't designed to last much past 20 years.

  38. Re:Solar Roadways by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

    This is a real product, solar frickin roadways is scam to defraud idiots in the public and the government.

  39. hail storms by siamesevodka · · Score: 1

    Having gone through a huge hail storm in south central Kansas a few years back I can tell you what to expect. Damage was extensive over a 3 county area taking roofs siding automobiles and windows on the house. The waiting period for me to see an agent with my insurance company was 90 days. They tried to low ball all the estimates they could and fight you in court. The insurance companies pooled their money, so when I went to cash the check for repairs, the bank said they would hold the check for two weeks until it cleared. I ask why and they said sometimes there was money in the insurance pool, sometimes there wasn't. And if it would come to you having skylights on the roof, if you had the wrong policy [one that didn't have a rider for skylights] you would not get coverage for carpet and interior damage.So an expensive glass roof from Elon Musk would require an expensive rider. Any savings in electricity might be offset by premiums waiting for the mother of all hail storms. I have had 5 roofs put on my house in an ownership period of 30 years. I have quit insurance companies because they have dropped total replacement and wanted to do a depreciation policy. So if you want to stand out in your front yard and argue with an adjuster about depreciation on your solar panels be my guest. If you live in Mojave California you might beat the odds, but not everywhere.

  40. Re:Interconnects by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    They're definitely not "so last century" because they're cost effective. This becomes more and more pronounced as panels themselves becomes cheaper: extracting all possible performance from expensive panels (high efficiency mono-Si, for example) at significant extra cost is often a viable option, but doing the same for much cheaper panels, or in places with cheap labor (or usually both at once), is a significantly dimmer idea, if you pardon the pun.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  41. house design change in the future? by 4wdloop · · Score: 1

    Perhaps future houses would be designed and located so the roofs are more conveniently (optimally) exposed to the sun? Semi-circle like?

    --
    4wdloop
  42. store cold instead of electrons? by 4wdloop · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if we solve the problem of storing "cold" instead of electricity to produce it (cold) on demand then that be cheaper?
    Freeze your boiler over?
    Granted there is limited use of it: AC and drinks...

    --
    4wdloop