Slashdot Mirror
Researchers Make a High-Performance Battery From Junkyard Scraps (vanderbilt.edu)
Science_afficionado writes: A team of engineers and materials scientists at Vanderbilt University have discovered how to make high-performance batteries using scraps of metal from the junkyard and common household chemicals. The researchers believe their innovation could provide the large amounts of economical electrical storage required by the grid to handle alternative energy sources and may ultimately allow homeowners to build their own batteries and disconnect entirely from the grid. Vanderbilt University News reports: "To make such a future possible, Pint headed a research team that used scraps of steel and brass -- two of the most commonly discarded materials -- to create the world's first steel-brass battery that can store energy at levels comparable to lead-acid batteries while charging and discharging at rates comparable to ultra-fast charging supercapacitors. The research team, which consists of graduates and undergraduates in Vanderbilt's interdisciplinary materials science program and department of mechanical engineering, describe this achievement in a paper titled 'From the Junkyard to the Power Grid: Ambient Processing of Scrap Metals into Nanostructured Electrodes for Ultrafast Rechargeable Batteries' published online this week in the journal ACS Energy Letters. The secret to unlocking this performance is anodization, a common chemical treatment used to give aluminum a durable and decorative finish. When scraps of steel and brass are anodized using a common household chemical and residential electrical current, the researchers found that the metal surfaces are restructured into nanometer-sized networks of metal oxide that can store and release energy when reacting with a water-based liquid electrolyte. The team determined that these nanometer domains explain the fast charging behavior that they observed, as well as the battery's exceptional stability. They tested it for 5,000 consecutive charging cycles -- the equivalent of over 13 years of daily charging and discharging -- and found that it retained more than 90 percent of its capacity."
Those fuckers are always getting the latest and greatest stuff.
Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
Maybe in 1985, when plutonium is available in every corner drug store, but in 2016, it's a little hard to come by.
The nickel iron battery in alkaline is an old, rugged battery chemistry. The nanostructuring the surface is new. The scrap bit seems like hype. Steel is easy to separate out by magnets, and copper is more expensive. So is nickel. I guess a cheaper substitute to nickel would also be an improvement.
...unless one is interested in Railguns.
Anyone browsing /. that does not have an interest in railguns should be ejected from the site... using a railgun!
You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
Not really.
When storing energy for my *house* I don't give a rats about energy density as long as I can put it somewhere where it's not a total nuisance.
Never happened. True story.
Supercaps have their place. Even though they have a lot less energy density than batteries, they are useful to have with a solar array just because they can be charged up quickly, with less need of a precise charge controller with scaling voltages to SoC levels (especially lithium batteries that will go boom if they are not precisely charged/discharged). Supercaps can allow charging to continue for batteries for a little bit after the sun goes down as well as help maintain an even charge if a cloud passes over the panels.
It would be nice to see some advance to allow supercaps to have a better energy density per volume. The fact that they have a virtually unlimited charge/discharge life (as the charging is a physical, not chemical process) and they can handle a lot of incoming amperage is quite nice.
Here we go again - a 'private' institution garnering information and expertise from the PEOPLE's funds - NASA and other 'public' funded agencies - - - and NASA explicitly states that they release their information on a "NON-EXCLUSIVE" license - in other words, ANYBODY can ask for, and GET, authorization to use their research.
WHY in the hell is this information locked up behind a pay-wall ?
Best guess - money hungry, and with no morale compass.
Here's the link, provided by ???? for the actual article and data ---> http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/...
More info can be garnered from ---> http://pubs.acs.org/
and at ---> http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/...
REALLY a pain to follow-up on, but worth the effort due to another /. contributor providing REAL information
redneck geek