Slashdot Mirror


4chan May Have Brought Down Pro-Clinton Phone Lines Before Election Day (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Yesterday, as groups across the country hit the final stretch of their get-out-the-vote campaigns, workers at NextGen Climate noticed some problems with their automated dialer program. As the team started its morning hours, the program used to initiate and monitor voter calls was suddenly clunky, and cut out entirely for crucial hours in the afternoon. The downtime wasn't a coincidence. Just after midnight on Sunday night, a post on 4chan's /pol/ board announced an impending denial-of-service attack on any tools used by the Clinton campaign, employing the same Mirai botnet code that blocked access to Twitter and Spotify last month. One of those targets was TCN, the Utah-based call center company that runs NextGen's dialer. According to the post's author, the company was also providing phone services to Hillary Clinton's offices in Nevada. "List targets here that if taken out could harm Clinton's chances of winning and I will pounce on them like a wild animal," the post reads. "Not sleeping until after this election is over." TCN confirmed the outage in a statement, describing the attack as "fairly sophisticated in nature." According to the statement, "the primary impacts were a slow site and a few brief periods of unavailability." The statement also makes it clear that NextGen Climate was far from the only group slowed down by the outage. TCN manages calling services for 2000 different clients, with a particularly brisk business during campaign season handling "everything from inbound information IVRs, outbound surveys to volunteer outreach."

99 comments

  1. I'm conflicted by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate this sort of thing, generally speaking... but bringing down an auto-dialer farm seems like a net plus for humanity.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I'm conflicted by wierd_w · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. I would feel much better about this if they had targeted all of the campaign autodialer firms, and not just Hillary's. An election free from hounding pollsters, cold calls, and attack ads would be like waking up from a bad dream.

      Too bad the autodialers diversify and innocent services get impacted by the denial of service.

    2. Re:I'm conflicted by markdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not conflicted at all.

      ALL autodialing systems should be illegal and a criminal offense. A system should be developed to prevent all ID spoofing and a target should be able to press a simple code number to have it reported directly to an agency who is required to research and prosecute. Such calls are beyond annoying, stupid, and an invasion of privacy. ANY system taken down is a plus, regardless of what type, source, or target.

      DIE!

    3. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised they're still doing that. Seems like it would be counterproductive at this point. Nearly every website I've been to today helpfully informed me it was election day. I'd assume some people are getting annoyed.

    4. Re:I'm conflicted by imadeyoureadpoop · · Score: 1

      I hate this sort of thing, generally speaking... but bringing down an auto-dialer farm seems like a net plus for humanity.

      Add 4chan to that and you've got yourself a deal, sir!

      --
      Hanlon's Razor -- Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
    5. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm hoping that it's revenge for a particular call to a particular person, not an act to rig an election. On the other hand, this is one of the few forms of "hacking as political speech" that clearly falls into the civil disobedience category instead of being just criminally assholish destruction.

    6. Re:I'm conflicted by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      ALL autodialing systems should be illegal and a criminal offense.

      In my state (Washington), they have been illegal for several years... UNLESS they're being used by political campaigns. Big surprise, huh?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:I'm conflicted by hey! · · Score: 1

      I agree on the spoofing issue; the main problem with autodialing (as opposed to manual) isn't autodialing per se, but predictive dialing where the computer speculatively dials based on the likelihood of an operator becoming free in the next few seconds.

      But in a way it's almost a boon. If I pick up the phone and count three-Mississippi with nobody on the other end I just hang up.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:I'm conflicted by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Get Ooma with the Community Blacklist. I didn't get a single political call this year. I almost never get sales calls either. In fact, when Ooma actually rings, it's somebody I want to talk to. WELL worth $9.99 per month.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re:I'm conflicted by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      >> ALL autodialing systems should be illegal and a criminal offense.

      I'll go further and say that any unsolicted marketing calls should be illegal, as should be spoofing your caller ID.

      It boggles my mind that phone companies haven't already been ordered to provide the caller's number themselves rather than allow the caller to do so.

    10. Re: I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As much I hate autodialing systems, that may not be the core issue here.

      Based on the very little info that I read here, this seems to clearly fall into the realm of "interfering in a fair election". If Russia had done this, our security services would probably be gearing up for a fairly ugly netspace counterattack. And it really doesn't matter if the target was Clinton or Trump. You don't mess with of our elections for free - you face consequences. That strikes right at the heart of our system and we should take such attacks very, very seriously.

      If it's verifiable, I suspect that the 4chan people will find out just how non-anonymous they really are. If they are local, they can probably look forward to a visit from law enforcement and a trial. Of course, if they are international, it gets murkier.

    11. Re:I'm conflicted by Z80a · · Score: 2

      Most of the 4chan is actually pretty decent.
      It's mostly /pol/ that is a bit of a fuck up, but its a fuck up you still can argue with.

    12. Re:I'm conflicted by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hacking one side but not the other is clearly politicialy biased, and deserving of jail time if ever there was someone deserving of jail time for a DDoS. This is not civil disobedience but is clearly assholish destruction. Democracy needs to have fair and open elections that are not tweaked because some kid in a basement thinks that his preferred moron for office is better than another moron for office. All voices need to be heard so trying to force some voices to shut up is anti-democratic.

    13. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cord cutter in California. Not one ad. Not one phone call. Nothing at all.

    14. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the 4chan is actually pretty decent.
      It's mostly /pol/ that is a bit of a fuck up, but its a fuck up you still can argue with.

      You mean /pol/, /b/, /v/, /vg/, /mu/, /k/, /mlp/, /soc/ and /lgbt/ are all fucked up, but apart from that it's pretty decent.

    15. Re:I'm conflicted by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      >ALL autodialing systems should be illegal and a criminal offense.

      What does that mean exactly? I manage auto dialing and notification systems for doctors offices that notify people they have appointments coming up. So I assume you mean unsolicited dialing. Of course in that case these groups will try to buy into existing lists so they aren't "unsolicited".

    16. Re: I'm conflicted by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Well, 4chan is people from all over the world (just surf there and look at all the different flags that post), so I expect this to be pretty murky.

    17. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is civil disobedience" and "this is deserving of jail time" are not mutually exclusive. The exact opposite actually. Civil disobedience by it's very definition involves breaking the law. You are deliberately breaking the law, deliberately trying to be arrested, to draw attention to what you consider an unjust law.

    18. Re: I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we have drones.

    19. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be illegal doesn't justify vigilante action. What should really be illegal is letting people with no ethical principles and critical thinking skills spew their cognitively impaired nonsense on the internet.

    20. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /lit/ would be okay if we could get rid of the philosophags and the Zizek shitposters.

    21. Re:I'm conflicted by DutchUncle · · Score: 2

      >>> ... phone companies haven't already been ordered to provide the caller's number themselves rather than allow the caller to do so.

      I used to work in telephone systems. The ability to set an ID was INTENDED to allow reasonable situations, e.g. any outgoing call from a switchboard showing the general switchboard number (or perhaps a departmental number) rather than the individual number of the switchboard's "hunt group" by which the call is actually controlled in the PSTN. If you specify the definition of "spoofing" as setting a caller ID that does not reverse-identify to the same owner, I agree with you 100% (even though that would eliminate some old-style legitimate uses, like a doctor being able to call from a hospital but have the caller ID show his office number) (which was a useful trick when using someone else's phone, before everyone had their own cellphone).

    22. Re:I'm conflicted by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't care if you want to classify it as civil disobedience or not, suppressing someone else's speech is antithetical to a free society. The answer to speech that you dislike is more to oppose it with your own free speech, not to shut it down.

      If you find phone banks utterly detestable, the solution is to start a political campaign to end them and then point a phone bank of your own at the various members of Congress. Perhaps they'll quickly grow less fond of the notion that robodialers are perfectly legal when used for political purposes.

    23. Re:I'm conflicted by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      I hate this sort of thing, generally speaking... but bringing down an auto-dialer farm seems like a net plus for humanity.

      My vote goes to whoever invents a practical means of killing robocall centers. So should the Nobel Peace Prize.

    24. Re:I'm conflicted by onepoint · · Score: 1

      What this act has done is rather simple. People are going to look for this person(s) and find a way to ruin the basic lives they have.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    25. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speech isn't free when it uses my resources.

      End of topic.

    26. Re: I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conflicted? This isn't civil disobediance. This is political terrorism.

    27. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democracy needs to have fair and open elections that are not tweaked...

      You folk got much bigger problems and a loooooong way to go before you need to worry about killing a robo-caller, dude ...

    28. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      But US democracy is not and will not be fair nor open. Subsidized media makes sure of that.

    29. Re:I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit! Political auto-dialers should be illegal - END OF!

    30. Re: I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "terrorism", lol
      It's wrong, unethical, and illegal to do, definitely; but if it actually terrorized anyone, it'd only be the tumblrinas who go fetal and shudder in their safe space at the mention of anything non-liberal.

    31. Re: I'm conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in NC and I was only getting harassed by Clinton's camp. Lots of spam texts since early voting started, a rudely-timed call on Monday (you say you're calling from NC that's cute it's after 8), two or three calls on Tuesday...one of them right after I hung up with the previous one after asking them to STOP CALLING ME... None of the other three called me or sent me texts or anything. Closest was some group not party-aligned handing out lit as I walked in not long after my voting site opened. (The at-site people this year were very nice, even when it was just me walking a dog saying hi.)

  2. Shameful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to stop this 4chan guy before he strikes again!

  3. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate autodialers / automated calls with a passion. Also, tough luck for Hillary. Why would anyone want a president that out-corrupts anything Trump could aspire to?

    1. Re:Good by magarity · · Score: 1

      Anyone whose vote would have been influenced by a robocall the day before the election 1) hasn't been paying attention or 2) has a severe multiple personality disorder

  4. At it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That hacker 4chan at it again.

  5. Here's my take on the election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you voted for Killary you probably eat shit out of the asshole of a faggot.
    If you voted for Chump you probably eat shit out of the asshole of a faggot.

  6. And by 4chan by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Funny

    is it safe to assume we mean "Russia"?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:And by 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      All hacks are done by Russian's now, didn't you get the memo. ESPECIALLY when we have no idea who did it.

    2. Re:And by 4chan by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Bonus points if you claim your least favorite candidate caused them to do it!

    3. Re:And by 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As most people with the ability to read know already, the Mirai botnet was not leveraged by Russians. And unless you have evidence to the contrary, the emails from Clinton/Podesta/etc were obtained by Russian hackers.

      I guess Trump needs all the foreign-interest and unrelated retard help he can get.

    4. Re:And by 4chan by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      All hacks are done by Russian's now, didn't you get the memo. ESPECIALLY when we have no idea who did it.

      China must be thrilled at this turn of events. I can't think of a bigger beneficiary of this new blame the Russians thinking.

    5. Re:And by 4chan by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Russia shot the sherfiff. So when the deputy shows up dead the tendency is to be suspicious about the usual suspects.

    6. Re:And by 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?
      Not Israel?
      They are well-known for their intelligence ops against the US. Anyone with a clearance more than just secret (ts, sap, etc) has had a briefing outlining the threat actors (and what to watch out for from them) and israel is right there are the top.

    7. Re:And by 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you mean "against" the US? Surely it is much less suspicious to not spy on your own country directly but ask your allies to do it for you. Then pretend outrage if the spying ops get revealed.

    8. Re:And by 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might notice it happened right after Obama met with China to discuss cybersecurity- the new policy is China stopped hacking us so blame anyone else.

    9. Re:And by 4chan by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Russians have standards

  7. The hacker known as 4 Chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory: Who is this 4chan?

  8. Well obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just want to see the world burn with trump at the wheel.

  9. a honey bee pesseree for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    courtesy of Robot 9001

  10. Too little, too late by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Doesn't look like it's going to make any difference.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, one of the two dirt bags is still going to win.

  11. Morally wrong by myid · · Score: 4, Informative

    I voted for Trump, and I hate getting these calls as much as anyone. But disrupting election efforts like this is morally wrong. It's unfair to the party that's getting attacked, and it's an attack against having a free and fair election.

    1. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      So long as the electoral college exists, there is no such thing as a free and fair election in the United States.

    2. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree but seeings as where the media that should be impartial has gone out of their way to present Trump up like some Emmanuel Goldstein? I simply don't give a fuck at this point. And it's not that I support him but the shit the media has shoveled is even too foul for me.

    3. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the scale of attacks against free and fair elections, I'd say this is about the 3782nd place on the list.

    4. Re: Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then answer me this: When seconds count the police are half an hour away. How shall the rights necessary for country living by city slickers who do not understand them and so want to tear them down for they perceive them dangerous?

    5. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1) It's not a simple "fair or not fair situation". Your reply is pointless.
      2) The electoral college distorts the popular vote very little, moreover it reflects the fact that we are the United States of America, not just a big federal government. True to the structure of our government from the beginning, the people of various states vote within themselves, and the states via the electoral finalize the election by representing the votes of the states.
      3) If you want to talk about fairness and our government, just look at the Senate. It's completely undemocratic and much more blatant affront to representational democracy, but also a result of the very structure of our country as United States.

    6. Re: Morally wrong by ichthus · · Score: 2

      Maybe someone will answer your question if you ask it in form (grammar and syntax) that makes sense. I read it three times and still don't understand.

      --
      sig: sauer
    7. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing free or fair about the $1 = 1 vote style of elections in the US; but yes, this is morally wrong.

    8. Re: Morally wrong by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      He is a gun nut I guess.

    9. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voted for Trump, and I hate getting these calls as much as anyone. But disrupting election efforts like this is morally wrong. It's unfair to the party that's getting attacked, and it's an attack against having a free and fair election.

      MMmmkay?

    10. Re: Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grammar is good. My syntax is good. Maybe you can't handle the 4 levels of abstraction required to think the thought. No lesser complexity will serve.

      And as for 110010001000 there are about 4 completely different vital rights and guns is only 1 of them.

    11. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You voted to hand the NSA backdoor keys to Putin. You voted to disable NATO, you voted for a man with billions in hidden assets in Russia, and a money laundering casino operation in Panama.

      Do you think Putin gives a fuck about your morals?

    12. Re:Morally wrong by quantaman · · Score: 0

      I voted for Trump, and I hate getting these calls as much as anyone. But disrupting election efforts like this is morally wrong. It's unfair to the party that's getting attacked, and it's an attack against having a free and fair election.

      Why?

      In the closing days of the election his own campaign didn't even trust him with a Twitter account.

      What possessed you to think he should be President????

      --
      I stole this Sig
    13. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job, you voted for Cheeto Hitler. YOU are a fucking anti-American terrorist and I hope you and your family are shot to death by the hatred brought by your decision you fucking cock sucking piece of shit fucktard prick.

    14. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1). It is a simple not-fair though. It is an awkward and artificial system that is prone to flaws. It wasn't even designed, just developed. This is wrong.
      2). Wrong! Check out the Wyoming Rule. Apply it to tonight's electoral results. See the difference. It's the size of the House that causes harm to the representation of the government, and violates the principles of fairness.
      3). We already did. That is why they are popularly elected now. But the gerrymandering in the House is even worse, even aside from being disproportionate.

    15. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's going to get his wish.

      The only thing worse for the republican party than a Trump loss is a Trump win. And it looks like they are now going to have to lie in the bed they made.

    16. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the hope for a free and fair election went out the window with clinton and dnc's antics during the primaries. once they got rid of bernie, the one true people's candidate, trump could have given his victory speech right then.

    17. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be a wee angry mate :D

    18. Re:Morally wrong by houghi · · Score: 1

      I think having a free and fair election would be a great idea for the USofA. Perhaps try it the next time, because there are som many things wrong with the US Election System it isn't even funny anymore.
      This has NOTHING to do with the outcome as BOTH where a bad choice.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    19. Re:Morally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're foaming at the mouth. You should swallow or spit it out.

    20. Re: Morally wrong by Holi · · Score: 1

      " When seconds count the police are half an hour away. "

      That's a statement not a question.

      "How shall the rights necessary for country living by city slickers who do not understand them and so want to tear them down for they perceive them dangerous?"
      Nope that bit does not make any sense. Grammatically it's a fucking mess.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    21. Re: Morally wrong by ichthus · · Score: 1

      No, because I'm a gun nut, and if he were speaking my native tongue ('Murican) I'd understand.

      --
      sig: sauer
  12. Sorry about that by PPH · · Score: 1

    My pet frog, Pepe got loose and was jumping on my keyboard.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Sorry about that by sheramil · · Score: 1

      him name is Hopkin green frog i'll find my frog who took my frog?

    2. Re:Sorry about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if i looking for frog

    3. Re:Sorry about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a hopkin in my truck. AT ALL TIMES.
      lostfrog.org

  13. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time bring ALL of the auto-dialers down. Politician @$$holes gave themselves an exemption from the do-not-call list.

  14. Archive post redacted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that the archive link is down? Why is nobody talking about it?

  15. /pol/: even more cancerous than /b/ at it's worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4chan is already having enough problems since Moot sold it off to the owner of 2chan, who, apparently, is mismanaging it even worse than Moot ever did, and /pol/ is about as out-of-control as any 'containment' board there could possibly be, full of nothing but cancer, red-pill faggotry, and epic FAIL, but now they, apparently, have gone and done something actionable. Won't at all be surprised if it's Party V& time.

    ..and nothing of value was lost

  16. Who cares? by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you didn't know today was Election Day, and hadn't made up your mind yet, do us all a favor and don't vote.
    Seriously. People who might have benefited from these calls are clearly not really making an informed, thought-out decision if they are this out-of-touch.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people are generally bad at remembering things. For example this one thing... uhhh...hmmmm... yeah. What was I saying?

  17. Re: /pol/: even more cancerous than /b/ at it's wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People just google "comet ping pong pizza" "also podesta pedos on reddit" wake up sheep...

  18. Wrong, wrong wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot in any way abide the taking down of robo-callers, unless the robo-callers are trying to sell me stuff. Political robo-callers are off-limits.

    ,

    Seriously, I wish these d dudes would take down some of the four or five robo-caller that annoy me each and every day. The political garbage will end tomorrow. But the "cheaper electircal rates" garbage will live on....

  19. Email by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Pro-Hillary phone-lines down? No problem, just use email ... oh, wait

  20. DDoS everywhere by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    I agree with you, I hate seeing this kind of thing no matter who does it. Wikileaks has faced a ton of DDoS attacks as well, especially this week.

  21. Nature of Civil Disobedience by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    You are deliberately breaking the law, deliberately trying to be arrested, to draw attention to what you consider an unjust law.

    No. That's civil disobedience with a wholly optional publicity component.

    Civil disobedience (in the US) is disobeying a law because your position is that the law is invalid, unethical, immoral or unconstitutional (which in many people's minds is a subset of invalid.)

    This may be of interest -- it's a fairly specific discussion of suffering the consequences of the law as it relates to the validity of civil disobedience.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  22. I never "solicit" automated dialing by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    I assume you mean unsolicited dialing.

    I never solicit automated dialing. I find it offensive.

    If you deliver a recording or a synthesized voice to my phone, I will hang up on it.

    If various operations can't be bothered to put a person to work, someone who at least might have the flexibility to respond to my inquiries, direct me where I need to go to deal with issues, etc., I can't be bothered to give them any of my time.

    When real AI gets here and if as a consequence people's employment isn't a critical factor WRT to their level of stress and/or suffering, I will most likely moderate that stance.

    But until then, IMHO, this stuff is not good for society at large. I can't support it. I won't support it.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:I never "solicit" automated dialing by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Its like those voice menu systems you get when you phone anyone these days. I refuse to talk to a machine.
      They can ask for all the info they like before they try and let me speak to a human, but I just keep saying "agent" in response to everything. It pretty much always works.

    2. Re:I never "solicit" automated dialing by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you might enjoy this.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  23. Well if Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Trump wins, then Russia gets the keys to all those backdoors the NSA has been putting in, so Russia has a vested interest in putting their Trumpsky into power.

  24. That very much depends on who you are by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > You don't mess with of our elections for free - you face consequences

    That very much depends on who you are (or who your husband used to be). Also WHERE you are. In some counties, the local Democrat party is openly committing felony vote buying- the votes bought include the local prosecutor etc.

  25. Julius Kivimaki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've said it before and I'll say it again, he has repeatedly taken credit among blackhat circles for all of this Mirai botnet bullshit.

    The fact that he hasn't wound up with a bullet in his shit-filled head is honestly a mystery to me, but at this point all I can figure is that the relevant authorities are letting him run roughshod over the world in order to come up with actual charges that they can press against him.

    The little shit is nothing more than a sociopath, one of those smug dipshits that exists in every classroom who only ever raises his hands in order to give some smug, smart-ass answer that only him and his equally socially stunted friends find funny. The world would be better off without him in it, but I'll settle for him being behind bars, as opposed to being on the years of "probation" that his father managed to wrest for his pwecious wittwe bwoy thanks to his dad's money.

  26. Fairly sophisticated by castus · · Score: 1

    TCN confirmed the outage in a statement, describing the attack as "fairly sophisticated in nature."

    This is exactly how I would describe a DDoS attack as well. As sophisticated as using a sledgehammer to disassemble a computer

  27. Expect us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are Anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. You really should have expected us, bitch.

  28. curso NR 10 by Instituto+SC · · Score: 0

    Curso NR 10 online curso NR 10 curso NR 10 online