Slashdot Mirror


November 14th Supermoon Will Be Biggest In 68 Years (nationalgeographic.com)

On Monday, November 14th, you may be able to see the biggest and closest supermoon Earth has seen since 1948. A "supermoon" is a full moon that "coincides with the lunar orb's closest approach to Earth, or perigee." National Geographic explains how you can experience one of the best lunar spectacles in decades: This month, the moon officially reaches perigee at 6:21 a.m. ET (11:23 UT) on November 14, when it will be just 221,524 miles from our planet, as measured from the center of both Earth and the moon. The moon reaches its full phase only two and a half hours later, at 8:52 a.m. ET (13:52 UT) on November 14. Earth hasn't been buzzed this close by a full moon since January 26, 1948, when our lunar companion was a mere 30 miles closer than this month's supermoon. Enjoy the sky show while it lasts, because the full moon won't get this close to us again until November 25, 2034. And the absolute closest full moon to Earth this century will occur on December 6, 2052, when our celestial neighbor will be just 221,472 miles away. Globally, the best time to catch this sky event is just after your local sunset on November 14, as the silvery orb rises in the east. For North Americans, the lunar disk will appear to be nearly equally full and impressive on the nights of November 13 and 14, so if you get clouded out on the first night, you'll have another chance to catch the epic sky show. The best view will be in the early morning close to dawn, as the moon sets in the west before the sun rises in the east. By the numbers, the November full moon will appear to be 7 percent larger than average and nearly 15 percent brighter.

53 comments

  1. its flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not a globe

    1. Re: its flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha. you sure?

    2. Re: its flat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just search on youtube "flat earth"

  2. This is such a refreshing change from politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    thank you

    1. Re:This is such a refreshing change from politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Shine on, shine on harvest moon, up in the sky;
      I ain't had no lovin' since April, January, June or July.
      Trump time ain't no time to stay outdoors and spoon,
      So shine on, shine on harvest moon, for me and my gal.

  3. So? by DerekLyons · · Score: 0

    So what? The difference won't visible to the naked eye. This kind of fake 'news' doesn't belong here.

    1. Re:So? by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      I agree - it seems like every other month or so there's "gee whiz" story about a "supermoon" or "supermars" or some "celestial alignment" or something. But at best it's probably no more than a fraction of a percent bigger than normal, and it doesn't actually mean anything. If they didn't make a big deal out of it, no one would notice or care.

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vampires will be twice as hungry. Suckers will be twice as gullible.

    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no more real tech news. Oh wait, new computer screen has 11 more pixels bringing the total number up to 14billion times more than a human can see with an optical mircoscope

    4. Re:So? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      The difference is visible to the naked eye, even with just a "regular" supermoon.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded at 3? Why does astronomy suddenly seem so unimportant to people?

      Fine. You probably wanted it political anyway:

      November 14th Supermoon Behind the Trumpocalypse

    6. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference *can* be seen with the naked eye. It's not as dramatic as the hype would lead you to believe but it is visible. Unless you are blind, of course.

    7. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it isn't. stop being willfully ignorant.

    8. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earth-Moon distance at the time of the Nov 14 full moon: 356,546 km
      Earth-Moon distance at the time of the Oct 16 full moon: 357,884 km (a regular supermoon)

      The naked eye can see a 0.37% increase in diameter?

    9. Re:So? by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "supermoon" may look slightly larger than the moon normally looks when it's close to the earth (i.e. every two weeks), but not significantly. In particular, it pales in comparison to the psychological effect of viewing the moon low in the sky (when it looks larger, even though it's actually further away) vs high in the sky (when it looks smaller, even though it's actually closer).

      But there's still no reason it should be in the news: regular people wouldn't even notice if it wasn't pointed out to them, and astronomers know it's just a cyclical thing that doesn't mean anything. Imagine if, every spring, the news was full of breathless reports of the upcoming "supersun" which would be much brighter than the "winter sun" and which would stay in the sky for hours longer than the winter sun. That's pretty much the level of amazement we're talking about.

      ...and in other news, Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead and water is still wet.

    10. Re:So? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Maybe people like me like to know? I certainly don't see anyone "breathlessly" claiming it's going to be the celestial event of the century, just an interesting astronomical tidbit. Every time I see a full moon, it captures my attention for a minute, so why not check it out at its best? I plan to wander outside and take a quick peek, and hope that cloud cover doesn't foil my plans.

      For my part, I'm glad /. let me know about this.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    11. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But at best it's probably no more than a fraction of a percent bigger than normal,..."
      "CapOblivious" is apparently a reference to reading comprehension:

      "By the numbers, the November full moon will appear to be 7 percent larger than average and nearly 15 percent brighter."
      Or perhaps Math is his problem...

      BTW:
      http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/supermoon-hunters-moon-2016-how-to-watch-see-spot-why-is-when-a7362291.html

    12. Re:So? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Can you please take out a piece of paper and make a drawing of your rational that the hight in the sky of the moon has any relation to its distance/size?
      My nephew might need it in his physics classes.
      Thank you.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re:So? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      When the moon is viewed at the horizon from your position it is approximately one Earth radii (6000km) further away from you compared to when it's directly overhead.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    14. Re:So? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or a bit more, if you're really tall.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:So? by digitig · · Score: 1

      The difference between this supermoon and the average full moon will be visible to the naked eye. The difference between this supermoon and other supermoons (which are relatively common) won't be.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    16. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SUPERSUN?! We must warn the graveyard shift!

    17. Re:So? by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      i dunno, last night at 4am it was awfully big and yellow from where i was standing and im sure i did not drop acid in the past 23 years ... or shrooms in the past 14

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    18. Re:So? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And how much is that in percent or promille of the distance of the moon? Or in arc seconds of its appearance at the sky? :D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  4. For small values of "Biggest" by whoever57 · · Score: 2

    It's only 9 or 10% bigger than a typical full moon.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:For small values of "Biggest" by garyoa1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. It's actually the same size. Just closer. ;)

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
    2. Re:For small values of "Biggest" by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      No. It's actually the same size. Just closer. ;)

      Where are my humor mod points when I need them?

  5. it will be YUUUGE by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    so i've heard

  6. just wait til january by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the moon will come crashing down on washington dc, ending life as we know it.

  7. I'm terrified by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    The engorged moon will cover 7/8 the sky and the increased gravitational pull will yank out Trump's hair implants

    1. Re:I'm terrified by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      terrified

      Information that may or may not be relevant: within 1 week of one of the biggest recent earthquakes the Moon was a "super" (March 11, 2011)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:I'm terrified by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      March 11 was the day Alexander Fleming died, his ghost punished us for overusing antibiotics and making superbugs.

  8. Good animated gif demonstrating what's going on by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    The gif was made to show libration (the slight rocking of the moon's face side to side). But it also shows the variance in the moon's apparent size during the near and far parts of its orbit around the Earth (perigee and apogee respectively). When full moon coincides with the nearest point in its orbit (as in the animation), it's called a supermoon.

  9. Foolishness like this by MrKrillls · · Score: 1

    Is why I visit Slashdot less and less. A complete non event getting headline status.

    --
    Don't step on the baby.
  10. Here's a graphic showing relative sizes by StupendousMan · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Michael Richmond "This is the heart that broke my finger."
    mwrsps@rit.edu http://stupendous.rit.edu
    1. Re: Here's a graphic showing relative sizes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I contest that this difference is visible with the naked eye, unless you use a Sharpie to draw the moon's outline on your eyeglasses, and wear them at the next full moon.

  11. It's a SuperTrumpMoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bigger in real life than on TV.

  12. It's your Mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest moon ever

  13. Re:It must be by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    No, the global warming effect is when the Earth looks just like the Moon.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  14. So on November 14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goatse 2.0 is launching?

  15. Green grass and high tides forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least until famine induced by global warming leads to nuclear annihilation.

  16. Prediction... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Here in the Midwest, 11/14 will be cloudy. Just like it is for the vast, vast majority of any astronomical events that are supposed to be visible. I haven't been able to catch sight of any of the annual meteor showers in years. We did see a couple of comets back in the late '90s and Northern lights a few years later but, by and large, the rest of anything that happens in the sky around here is obscured by clouds. Not that I won't be checking this out. Just in case.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  17. Be careful when taking pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use a Samsung galaxy note 7, it could ignite and send you in orbit.

  18. It works like cows then? by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

    So it works the same way as cows?

  19. It will be as big as the sun! by AC-x · · Score: 1

    The moon will be so close to the Earth that it will appear as big as the sun in the daytime sky! Amazing!

    /s

  20. Flooding caused by very high tides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    King tides are the advanced scouts of sea level rise.

  21. Super Saiyan ... by jodokast98 · · Score: 1

    uh oh. I have a feeling that unless the moon is destroyed, the president elect might transform into zaru. That orange glow of his, are really his super saiyan ki unleashed.

    1. Re:Super Saiyan ... by jodokast98 · · Score: 1

      Dang it slashdot, that was supposed to be Oozaru.

  22. Larger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    7% "larger"? I thought slashdot was a technical site. I don't know what "larger" means. Larger apparent diameter (arc length) or area? ? Sloppy. Same for "brighter". Does that mean per unit area or integrated light received? And no context: what is the human eye's ability to discriminate larger and brighter? But hey, thanks for the time info.

  23. Not all that super or rare.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will have been 425 "supermoons" in the 21st century. Roughly 4 per year (though this isn't an 'averages' thing...)

    Of those 425, 125 of them will be closer than Monday's approach, though the next closer approach will not occur until 2034.

    The closest of these in the 21st century will be in 2052. THAT one will be interesting because it will be 356,429 meters from Earth; the absolute minimum distance the moon can perigee with Earth is 356,400 meters - so that one will be less than 100 feet from closest possible approach ever.

    I expect to be alive for both of them.

    By the way, from farthest possible apogee to nearest possible perigee is a difference of only 14% in distance. In width it is not nearly that. And while it is considerably brighter, the eye is generally not capable of making a distinction between a brighter moon and dimmer one (outside of eclipses.)

    So, cool? Hell yeah. Worth all the hype the media is throwing at it? Hell no - it distracts from the coolness that is the normal perigee/apogee variations.