Slashdot Mirror


Mark Zuckerberg Says Fake News on Facebook Affecting the Election Is a 'Crazy Idea' (fortune.com)

A lot of questions are emerging about Facebook's role in this year's election cycle, especially given the proliferation of sensationalistic and even outright fake news stories, and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has responded. From a report on Fortune: "I think the idea that fake news on Facebook -- of which it's a very small amount of the content -- influenced the election in any way is a pretty crazy idea," he said on Thursday at the Techonomy conference in Half Moon Bay, Calif., just two days after Donald Trump was elected president, according to media reports. "There have been hoaxes on the Internet, there were hoaxes before," he said. "We do our best to make it so that people can report that, and as I said before, we can show people the most meaningful content we can."

3 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Show us the data by bytesex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which is worse?

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  2. Re:No, not fake news by butzwonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I can answer that. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were the best and most qualified for the highest office among all living Americans at age 35 or above. Nobody else is smarter or otherwise better equipped for the highest duty for his country, or else why would they have become presidential candidates in the first place? So there can be no loss either way. President Trump represents the best that America could possibly offer right now in terms of what voters and the electoral college think, directly followed by H. Clinton who won the popular vote. Not even Chuck Norris would have been better suited to become the next president of the US of A, which is why even he himself advertised for Trump. If you pardon me this French phrase, Trump and Clinton are both the creme de la creme of American society.

  3. How did Viagra effect the election, and does FB by raymorris · · Score: 3, Funny

    > "I was for this candidate until I heard he say this......" then sent you to a random page for Viagra

    How exactly does Viagra spam effect the outcome of the election?

    I know many people say they voted for Hillary based on her genitalia, is it related to that?