Slashdot Mirror
A USB Stick Can Show HIV Test Results In Under 30 Minutes (qz.com)
Researchers at Imperial College London have developed a USB stick that can measure the presence and amount of HIV in a person's blood in under 30 minutes and with 95% accuracy. The USB stick should help make testing easier in places like sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV is a serious problem and where many people live in rural regions hours or days travel away from hospitals or clinics. Also, traditional HIV testing can take days to show results, whereas the USB stick can show results in minutes. Quartz reports: The new diagnostic tool, co-created by the university and biotech company DNA Electronics, requires simply putting a single drop of blood onto a designated spot on the USB stick. The device contains a mechanism that can detect if there's any HIV genetic material -- RNA -- in the drop of blood, and if so, how much. Then, when the stick is connected to a laptop or handheld device, the data are automatically delivered to an app where the patient can quickly read his or her results. One of the most effective HIV treatments currently, called anti-retroviral treatment, reduces virus levels to near zero. However, in some cases, the virus may develop a resistance to medication or therapy, causing the virus to resurface. To catch such developments early, patients can use the devices for monitoring purposes. "The disposable test could be used by HIV patients to monitor their own treatment and help patients in remote regions of the world, where more standard HIV tests are inaccessible," the authors of the study write. For now, it's still in the proof-of-concept stage, and years away from hitting the market.
Under the gop system 30 min to get black listed for life.
i just got an HIV test that they referred to as the "quick HIV test" and required a finger prick. it took 20 minutes...
Please tell me Elizabeth Holmes isn't anywhere near this entity.
I don't know, I've seen some GIANT turds some jackass before me left in the toilet in public restrooms...
It might have a virus.
I saw a MASSIVE turd like nothing else in a restroom in Portland. Imagine one of those large french bakery rolls -- like the ones that are 3 feet long, only made out of PUMPERNICKEL. A big, brown French roll. That's what was left, not in the toilet, but in the **URINAL**.
For edification, DNAe actually has some merit. They're a London based company and developed the technology behind the Ion Torrent DNA sequencer that is sold by Thermo Fisher. The Ion Torrent is a valid machine, although not quite as good as the MiSeq from Illumina. It works by breaking DNA up and the hydrogen ions released create a measurable signal alteration on the silicon FETs; the chemistry invovled is astounding to make it go where you want and sequence stuff.
https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/brands/ion-torrent.html
This appears to be a miniaturization of the technology. Viruses, particularly RNA viruses, have a lot fewer genes to work with; HIV only has 9 genes as compared to the human genome which has around 25,000. Since you don't need as much processing power it's conceivable you could miniaturize the Ion Torrent technology for a smaller target like HIV viral RNA.
Doctors hate normal people so they always stand against fast and cheap tests.
maybe/maybe not.
As a straight male who lives in Austin, I say that's fine with us. As long as bigots like you stay under your rocks we'll be just fine.
Doctors make a percentage off of tests so they want expensive, inconclusive tests.
It's more the AMA than Republicans. They want test to be unreliable and expensive. Last time o had viral pneumonia, I ended up on the hospital and in a medically induced coma before they would help me.
You dumb fuck.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/me...
You are welcome on my lawn.
prison is a lifestyle choice but DR covers more then the ER does and they don't ask how are you going to pay for this.
Who are you working for? Obviously some type of paid agitator. GTFO.
Not exactly. But I can assure you that I make far more money than you do.
Why did they put you on the hospital? They could at least have provided a room
Actually, we have had simple paper test strips for over 15 years in this country, but the gay community has kept them from being widely distributed because they claim to fear discriminatory reprisals if HIV tests were readily available to the public.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
He didn't, 'o' ended up on the hospital.
Actually, we have had simple paper test strips for over 15 years in this country, but the gay community has kept them from being widely distributed because they claim to fear discriminatory reprisals if HIV tests were readily available to the public.
How absurd! Rapid HIV tests are widely available at health clinics and STD testing centres across North America. Within 1 minute you get a result that has 99.7% sensitivity and 99.98% specificity. In cases where a positive is detected, it can be followed up with a more accurate lab-based blood test.
Sexual and gender minorities are great advocates for making HIV testing faster, easier, and more reliable, so please keep your bigoted nonsense to yourself.
Texas == Hick.
^---- And this attitude is why Trump succeeded. Congrats. (If you're not in New York or LA, you an "uneducated white male").
I've heard the "uneducated white male" meme probably 5000x times on CNN in just two days. Let me give you a clue. 74% of the electorate is white. When you throw racial nonsense around, what do you expect is going to happen in the election?
Probably an opiate shit, especially considering it was Portland, you have to be on something to live there.
It has "a mechanism" to detect RNA...but only one specific kind of RNA? They didn't come up with a broader approach to detect, say, many kinds of viruses? And it's so commoditizable that it's a USB stick?
*cough*Theranos*cough*
For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
It's more the AMA than Republicans. They want test to be unreliable and expensive. Last time o had viral pneumonia, I ended up on the hospital and in a medically induced coma before they would help me.
Yeah, bad stuff like that always seems to happen to ACs. Amazing how much your life gets better when you log in.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
95% accurate with the other 5% in favour of false positive (falsely showing you have HIV) would probably be a lot better than mistakenly telling you that you don't have HIV.
If somebody uses the stick and gets the HIV+ reading, then hopefully he/she will go in for a more accurate test. Getting the all-clear for somebody actually is infected could result in some pretty bad outcomes though.
I like the idea of a USB stick that can reveal my HIV status. However, I have two questions about how this works:
Inquiring minds want to know.
I've had constant mod points for about 10 days and then when the site goes to shit and fills with trolls (who then mod good posts as troll) I get no mod points. Typical.
Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
Good up until "disposable test".
That's not so good.
We don't need more disposable junk.
We don't need the high cost either.
It should be rinsed and reusable.
Shame on them.
need to know both false positive and false negative surely?
If most people don't have HIV and people without HIV are correctly told that 95% of the time, that means there are shit loads of people being incorrectly told they have HIV
SURELY NOT!!!!!
Then why should the results be read through an app? Once results are found maybe it should produce some commonly readable files as the USB stick is mounted as a drive, allowing you to view say a PDF, TXT, HTML, and PNG of the results, allowing it to be read on any device in whatever format is most convenient. Why tie this to an app that may or may not be updated or even currently supported on the given OS?
Twinstiq, game news
does it come with a needle, some disinfectant and where can i get one ? i need to get laid STAT
Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
And as we all know, only gay people get aids..... /s
Got a date? Give the test before you get busy ! Make the device cheap and available everywhere. And we can have easy testing in public schools and in many other places and situations as well. Jails and prisons could use this to be certain that cell mates do not contaminate each other.
I think some here have a history problem. Lots of people do at various levels. Historically, because of fear of bigots, we put very high security on HIV testing results. We then explained that we needed to do professional counseling if we had a positive result.
There was a californian initiative to add it to a list of public health diseases that require public health style tracing. I vaguely supported it. Much money was,spent against it and it lost. The major leader against later said he regretted his position. I may regret mine also.
You need to think though about why there is not a test machine for HIV in every bar now. Or perhaps paper strips. I do not know if those exist but I know the bar test was developed.
I do not speak for the LGBT people but they are easy to ask these days.
First this device is ONLY effective for cases of "high viral load" which means "full-blown, endemic, untreated HIV infections", rather than "I fucked the wrong person last night, did I get HIV?" situations. The difference is that testing for something at such a high concentration is radically easier than a "detecting trace amounts" which are common to the latter situation OR cases of a person already being treated for HIV.
Second is the stated accuracy rate is 95% for in vivo (in a lab test tube version of the same test) but the unit itself isn't that accurate - it's only 88.8% accurate. Both of these don't mean that you have 95% certainty of yea or nay only when you have a 100% certain positive or negative - e.g. you get these numbers when you know for certain the person does or does not have HIV. This is not how clinical testing works - instead you don't know if the individuals tested have HIV - that's a different test and test result! So say the actual population rate 0.6% (e.g the USA). Then the actual clinical accuracy is far lower because the false positives and false negatives confound you. Use in the USA, the expected single test diagnostic accuracy would less than 1%. Used in Africa such as Zimbabwe, the single-test accuracy would be 15% and only because of the low cost, could be used again to retest to increase that accuracy.
To get "reasonable" accuracies, you need the accuracy rate to be "many 9's" such as 99.9% to avoid Bayesian effects. It's this Bayesian effect that causes both mammograms and PSA tests to be marginal to dubious in actual effectiveness. Same goes for this: the utility literally depends on having endemic HIV!