Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Launches SSD 960 EVO NVMe Drive At 3GB/Sec and Under .50 Per Gigabyte (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: When Samsung announced the SSD 960 PRO and SSD 960 EVO NVMe drives a few months back, their specifications, which included transfer speeds in excess of 3.2GB/s, were among the fastest for consumer-class M.2-based Solid State Drives currently. Testing proved the SSD 960 Pro to be one of the fastest NVMe drives on the market, and like that drive, Samsung's just-launched SSD 960 EVO is packing the company's latest 5-core Polaris controller -- but it features lower cost 3rd-generation 3-bit MLC V-NAND flash memory and a newly revamped version of Samsung TurboWrite technology. Though the SSD 960 EVO family's pricing places it firmly in the mainstream segment for NVMe-based solid state drives, its performance still targets enthusiasts but with lower endurance ranging from 100-400 TBW (Terabytes Written), depending on capacity. The new Samsung SSD 960 EVO comes in 250GB, 500GB and 1TB capacities and is still able to hit 3GB/sec in testing. Though it does trail the SSD 960 Pro in spots, it also drops in at a 15-20 percent lower price point.

108 comments

  1. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    NLE and database use, to name two off the top of my head.

  2. Re:TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care if he was elected or not. I still consider Clinton to be the president.

  3. Re:TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    Bill?

  4. Scorching hot! by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 0

    Er sorry, was that in bad taste?

    1. Re:Scorching hot! by dotbot · · Score: 1

      Blistering performance, apparently.

  5. Goodbye HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm a bit surprised how fast SSD's replaced spinning hard drives. In my house hold, we have six computers, two servers and a bunch of appliances with storage.

    Not a single spinning hard drive in sight.

    Good riddance.

    1. Re:Goodbye HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Must be pretty small Servers then. Multiple terabytes in SSD are still way too expensive for something that is essentially a datadump. Meaning media library and the like.

    2. Re:Goodbye HD by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Must be pretty small Servers then.

      Not all servers require large hard drives.

    3. Re:Goodbye HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 6TB for porn*, and 6TB for movies and TV shows, both doubled up for backup, so 24TB in all. Let me know when I can replace that with SSDs at the same or less cost compared to mechanical drives. All boot drives are SSDs though.

      *only half full, does that make me sound like less of an addict?

    4. Re:Goodbye HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I could do that. My main computer has a 4TB data drive completely full (largely video and music, but many GB of photos and software too). I have a 2nd 4TB drive for easy backup, and still waiting for 8TB drives to become mainstream for my next storage upgrade. And if you have an avid gamer in the house, it's hard to drop hard drives when some AAA games are north of 40GB in size.

    5. Re:Goodbye HD by Jamu · · Score: 1

      Depends what they're serving. Only my NAS uses HDDs though.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    6. Re: Goodbye HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so you love spinning disks, they make you feel special, don't they.

      What if they make a spinning SSD - will that help?

    7. Re: Goodbye HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck you people fill that up? I still have 2tb backup and there is room for porn

  6. How long by Dunbal · · Score: 0

    How full does it have to get before it explodes?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  7. Under .50 per gigabyte? by Tet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .50 what? Dollars? If so, why not say so?

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .50 what? Dollars? If so, why not say so?

      They are trying to save on bandwidth here.

    2. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Informative

      .50 what? Dollars? If so, why not say so?

      Just ".50" without any unit designation means that it is the Metric System. There are no units in the Metric System, just numbers. This is just one of the many advantages of the Metric System. It means that you don't have to worry about converting Hogs' Heads to the Queen's Empire Imperial Gallons. Things are just ".50".

      . . . or maybe ".60", if you are landing a probe on Mars.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ".50 what?"

      These are fast. They beat out the old record and can do the Kessel Run in 6 Parsecs.

    4. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the metric system requires that the unit is specified. If there's no unit given then must be Radians. So clearly this drive is 28.65 degrees per gigabyte.

    5. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a piece of junk

    6. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      .50 what? Dollars?

      Or maybe cents. 0.50 cents per gigabyte is $5 per TB which is better than a conventional drive, so that's pretty awesome.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    7. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new dollar symbol hasn't been decided yet. Trump isn't in office yet.

    8. Re: Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get cocky kid.

    9. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Funny

      .50 what? Dollars? If so, why not say so?

      Oh come on. This is the US, so obviously it means .50 caliber. The flash is now so small and robust that you can put more than a gigabyte in a .50 caliber bullet.

      Putting memory in bullets is a new, secret local mesh network design being put forward by the New World Order as a protection against society falling apart when it is revealed in January that Trump is actually a Lizard man.. So that when the US civil war starts next year (and the Internet is cutoff by the UN) neighbors will be able to surreptitiously keep in contact by spraying each other's houses with bullets containing enough flash to hold endless hours of cat videos. This will become an important staple of modern living as people will no longer have access to TV shows like The Real Housewives of [city de jour] to keep themselves entertained. And if you have military grade network equipment (EG M2 Browning machine gun) you can achieve some very high bandwidth numbers.

      This new mesh network has been designed this way so that the proletariat won't realize that they can point they network devices at the "government" instead of at each other.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    10. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not everyone is in the US

    11. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet.

    12. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      The new dollar symbol hasn't been decided yet. Trump isn't in office yet.

      Oh god, where is the mind bleach.? I just had a vision of Trump's face on a US dollar bill.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    13. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is the US

      I assure you, this is France, so it can only mean 0.50 baguettes / GB.

    14. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > not everyone is in the US

      They'll have to make do with .44 calibre, or 14.5mm KPVs

    15. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "3GB/Sec and Under .50 per Gigabyte".
      I guess it's assumed .50 is also GB/s.
      So, 3GB/s and .50GB/s/GB means the drive is at least a whopping 6GB!
      Welcome to the future everyone.

      (note to self: get a life)

    16. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god, where is the mind bleach.? I just had a vision of Trump's face on a US dollar bill.

      Whatever you do, DO NOT TURN IT OVER!

      You do not want to see the "backside".

    17. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SI system does specify using m and kg I think, so you'll say "10^6 kg" and not "a thousand tonnes" or "a gigagram" (the latter word doesn't even really exist)
      You don't have to use SI though, so most stuff is measured in mm, cm, grams, mL and L, in addition to kg, m^2 and m^3 - those happen to be SI units, but we use them no matter what the SI system thinks of it.

    18. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A unit is a constant. 1m (one meter) really means 1 * (whatever a meter is). Define it in inches, or fractions of a second at lightspeed, it does not matter as long as the values of this constant are ultimately the same. This is how conversions work: multiplying and dividing until you get the unit you want based on the relation of constants.

    19. Re:Under .50 per gigabyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i literally laughed out loud

  8. M.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not use a real PCIE slot?

    1. Re: M.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a real pci-e. If you mean a full-size card, how would that fit in a laptop or a mini-itx desktop?

    2. Re:M.2 by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Why not use a real PCIE slot?

      It's smaller. And probably lighter.

      Remember the new motto in mobile devices is shove 10 pounds of shit features in a 5-ounce magnesium-infused-carbon-amazamantium case and make it thin enough to bend with a hard fart, in order to maximize revenue by minimizing longevity. Oh, and in Apples case, remove every useful external connection, because Fuck You, that's why.

      I call it reverse marketing. You know, when manufacturers tell you what you need, and don't give a shit what you want.

    3. Re:M.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh, and in Apples case, remove every useful external connection, because Fuck You, that's why.

      MUH AUDIO JACK HOW IM SUPPOSED TO LIVE WITHOUT A CABLE BETWEEN MY EARS AND MY PHONE PLEASE HELP IM BEING OPRESSED BY APPLE. ALSO $7 DONGLE FOR MY $2000 LAPTOP IS UNACEPTABLE!

    4. Re: M.2 by dremspider · · Score: 2

      If you want a real pcie slot they sell cards that put two nvme drives on them for absout 20 bucks.

    5. Re: M.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you cant boot from those can you..

    6. Re:M.2 by geekmux · · Score: 1

      > Oh, and in Apples case, remove every useful external connection, because Fuck You, that's why.

      MUH AUDIO JACK HOW IM SUPPOSED TO LIVE WITHOUT A CABLE BETWEEN MY EARS AND MY PHONE PLEASE HELP IM BEING OPRESSED BY APPLE. ALSO $7 DONGLE FOR MY $2000 LAPTOP IS UNACEPTABLE!

      And for the hipsters, shitty ear buds or bullshit "Beats" are an acceptable audio standard, wired or not.

      For many others that prefer quality, a standard audio interface is preferred, and always delivered best when wired, especially when I don't have to worry about yet another fucking device that needs charging.

      There's a difference between oppression and brainwashing. Enjoy your iLobotomy.

    7. Re:M.2 by ledow · · Score: 2

      Because full-speed M2 -> PCI-e cards are literally in the bargain bin price range as they pretty much just join the pins to the bus.

      M2 works in laptops, other devices, and as a PCI-e with a cheap $10 adaptor. Hell, I've even seen some short M2 cards that fit inside a 2.5" drive adaptor to connect to SATA.

      That's why.

    8. Re:M.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure, Bluetooth isn't good enough for you. You need the "real thing". A cable and a vinyl disk. Of course you aren't the hipster here because your smartphone doesn't have an apple. You are an individual, unique like a snowflake, unlike everybody else.

      Sure.

    9. Re:M.2 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Why not use a real PCIE slot?

      4-lane NVMe is faster than SATA, and eliminates the SATA cable and the drive power cable. It's a no-brainer for SFF systems and it's not unappealing for bigger ones, either. Taking SATA out of the equation reduces latency. I am currently using a 500GB Samsung 850 Evo SATA drive, but my mainboard has an NVMe slot and I'll be popping a 1TB NVMe in there just as soon as I see a price I like. It's just less wires to hang out in the case airflow collecting dust.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:M.2 by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, Bluetooth isn't good enough for you. You need the "real thing". A cable and a vinyl disk. Of course you aren't the hipster here because your smartphone doesn't have an apple. You are an individual, unique like a snowflake, unlike everybody else.

      Sure.

      The Loudness War is not imaginary, audio "masters" who overprocess the shit out of everything today isn't an illusion, and manufacturers still prefer to make hardware designed for listening to music with wires, and not use wireless products designed for making phone calls.

      This is rather difficult to anyone to understand when the only audio world they've ever known is through ear buds and ripping off compressed shit from YouTube.

    11. Re:M.2 by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      Hell, I've even seen some short M2 cards that fit inside a 2.5" drive adaptor to connect to SATA.

      That's because M.2 can carry different things, not entirely unlike USB-C:

      Computer bus interfaces provided through the M.2 connector are PCI Express 3.0 (up to four lanes), Serial ATA 3.0, and USB 3.0 (a single logical port for each of the latter two). It is up to the manufacturer of the M.2 host or device to select which interfaces are to be supported, depending on the desired level of host support and device type. The M.2 connector has different keying notches that denote various purposes and capabilities of M.2 hosts and modules, preventing plugging of M.2 modules into feature-incompatible host connectors

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.2

      Some early or cheap M.2 SSD's use the SATA, the "proper" ones use PCIe (NVMe). Plugging a NVMe SSD into a M.2 slot which only has SATA (like that 2.5" adapter likely has) won't work.

    12. Re: M.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not : PCIe device is PCIe device.
      Heck I think you can boot from something behind a PCIe to PCI bridge, as well as use graphics cards through AGP to PCIe bridge, PCIe to PCI, AGP to PCI.

      So I'm pretty confident you can boot, although if your UEFI can't boot NVMe (or you have BIOS) then you'll be stuck but from the motherboard's side, not the little card's.

  9. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes your system faster, which is useful throughout the industry, not just "among a few dorks"

  10. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video editing, especially 1080p at 60fps and higher resolutions even more-so. Streamers and youtubers too, who record their streams at higher quality than they can live-broadcast and post the results later.

    Database servers also, it's far cheaper to buy two or four of these and RAID1 or RAID10 them than to buy any other way to get this kind of raw I/O performance.

    Basically anything involving LARGE amounts of data moving around constantly will benefit greatly.

    But you're semi-right, for basic gaming and OS use? Waste of money. Utter waste of money.

    - WolfWings, too damn lazy to login for too damn many years.

  11. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://regmedia.co.uk/2013/05/09/ihs_new_graph.jpg

  12. Samsung TurboWrite technology by MarceloFratini93 · · Score: 1

    They were use to increase the speed under higher capacity and great technology all in under one Drive

  13. Which .50 round? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .50AE? .50BMG? .50 Beowulf? Be specific.

  14. Fairly low endurance numbers by swb · · Score: 1

    Those endurance numbers seem pretty low to me. I seem to remember older SATA models surviving endurance tests close to a petabyte of writes. I think the drives themselves weren't rated for that, but they were also older MLC technology, too.

    I have 4 850 Pro SATA drives used in two separate systems which use Server 2012r2 tiered storage and they're about 18 months old and have around 40 TB written to them now.

    I wonder if the reduced endurance is just due to simply less underprovisioning at the flash level or if its the result of a process change to the flash construction that makes it weaker.

    I was kind of hoping the MLC endurance had kind of passed some threshold where endurance wasn't really a factor anymore for all but the most intensive write applications.

    1. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by haruchai · · Score: 2

      "I was kind of hoping the MLC endurance had kind of passed some threshold where endurance wasn't really a factor anymore for all but the most intensive write applications"

      Here's a hint: "features lower cost 3rd-generation 3-bit MLC V-NAND flash memory"
      3-bit is TLC not MLC so that may explain the poor endurance

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I did some back of the envelope and 100TB/3GBps consistently outptuts for me 33ks, that is less than half a day. So if you constantly write to the disk at top speed, the first will start dying after half a day?

      Now tell me please that I fucked up. Where's my babelfish?

    3. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly what i was thinking when i read this. TLC is cheap consumer tech and never used on enterprise SSDs.

    4. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      You're calculation is correct, but your use is extremely unrealistic. Can you identify a use case where you need to fill up a 250GB consumer drive 400 times sequentially in 9 hours?

      You want write rates to be as fast as possible so that the drive isn't the limiting factor, but realistic desktop/laptop use isn't going to be maxing that out for long periods of time. Even high end enterprise SSD won't do a significant fraction of the writes you are calculating and remain usable for long.

    5. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

      Let's see... 3 GB/sec with a maximum of 100 TB of writing works out to... 9.25 hours of continuous writing. So, don't use it as a RAM drive. Or with Windows Vista. I wonder how long it would last continuously compiling software? In fact, I'd be tempted to artificially restrict the write speed so that some write-happy process doesn't bork my drive after a few hours. I could write a 6-line program that needs no admin privileges and could destroy such a drive overnight.

    6. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Payday 2 updates

    7. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Those endurance numbers seem pretty low to me. I seem to remember older SATA models surviving endurance tests close to a petabyte of writes. I think the drives themselves weren't rated for that, but they were also older MLC technology, too.

      I have 4 850 Pro SATA drives used in two separate systems which use Server 2012r2 tiered storage and they're about 18 months old and have around 40 TB written to them now.

      I wonder if the reduced endurance is just due to simply less underprovisioning at the flash level or if its the result of a process change to the flash construction that makes it weaker.

      I was kind of hoping the MLC endurance had kind of passed some threshold where endurance wasn't really a factor anymore for all but the most intensive write applications.

      No, the numbers are right. Those are guaranteed numbers that Samsung to warrant the drive for. Once you hit that, you're on your own. And it turns out most drives get way more out of that (petabytes, even) - 10 times the guaranteed endurance isn't unusual. The practical upshot is a typical user will NOT wear out the drive over the expected lifespan of a few years, and even more extreme users will likely still be able to use it for years to come.

      Older SSDs have similar numbers spec'ed out, but wear testing reveals they can last far longer, just like these will too under test.

    8. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Exactly what i was thinking when i read this. TLC is cheap consumer tech and never used on enterprise SSDs.

      Of course "enterprise" is also code word for "market differentiation we can charge really much for". Nothing wrong with TLC if your workloads aren't write intense. For example I work for a registry, we have lots of data but only a relatively small amount is added or corrected mostly it's just accumulated. Of course the best thing is lots of memory, but beyond that I'd much rather take the IOPS of SSDs over HDDs and TLC is plenty endurance for the occasional index rebuild. There's no value ot SLC/eMLC unless you'll really be pounding it with writes. Sure those workloads are mostly in enterprise, but enterprise is a lot more than that.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      Enterprise SSDs usually come in two forms: (1) Read-intensive (lower cost, lower write durability) and (2) Write-intensive (higher cost, higher write durability). The only real difference between the two is that the write-intensive form implements a lot more over-provisioning (60% to 100%), and secondarily might use higher-quality bin-selected flash chips.

      -Matt

    10. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      The numbers are right. It is also likely that those cards can handle far more writes, just not under warranty.

      You have to be a bit careful about the petabyte capability tests. The flash cells in those tests might appear to work for the test but are probably sufficiently worn such that their unpowered data retention is at sub-par levels (like a few weeks instead of a year).

      Generally speaking you do want to replace the unit when the wear level indicator gets close to zero.

      -Matt

    11. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by swb · · Score: 1

      I've always found the enterprise category of "read-intensive" drives to be something of a canard. In tiered storage applications there is continual churn in the cache tier based on access frequency, and the read intensive drives take a lot of writes in order to serve frequent reads.

      I'm probably overstating it, but it feels like an excuse to gild storage systems with higher margin parts where they're not actually needed with a somewhat fabricated usage distinction.

    12. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TLC is cheap consumer tech and never used on enterprise SSDs.

      Never?
      Samsung PM1633 - Enterprise dual port 12Gb/s SAS. TLC.
      Samsung PM1725 - Enterprise HHHL PCIe NVMe. TLC.

    13. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you are assuming that the SSDs are only being used for general purpose loads. I would expect most enterprise SSD installations will be specifically tailored to the application they are supporting.

      That is certainly the case for someone like Facebook or Apple, for example. One is basically write-once/read-many (The facebook platform itself), the other is write-once/distribute-many (Apple's content distribution network). And any batch big-data processing related to those services will be an entirely different subsystem, with its own SSD tailoring.

      If a large SSD is used for caching, that's yet a different tailoring. Front-end caching is not necessarily write-intensive, though it can be. It would depend on the application and the size of the cache. In these cases it really just comes down to how much data is written to the array each day vs desired durability of the SSDs.

      -Matt

    14. Re:Fairly low endurance numbers by swb · · Score: 1

      Most commercial storage systems I've worked with aren't really tailored to any specific workload or task, but general block I/O. The one that pops to mind is Compellent, and the newer units I see most often have a mix of read-intensive and write-intensive SSDs. The Compellent tiering system moves frequently accessed data pages in and out of the "read intensive" tier at least daily with a default configuration and most customers have a secondary data progression task scheduled.

      I may be wrong (and hey, I probably am, I'm used to it), and data pages that get onto read intensive disks are high read/low change, but I don't know that the Compellent is really that smart and the nature of generic block I/O (especially when the data source is a VM host cluster) and data progression seems to guarantee more churn than is optimal.

  15. Re:Who gives a shit? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    Sure it is. It's a social media site that brings together potato enthusiasts around the world. Youtuber features recipes for French fries and stuffed skins, Irish history, and commentary detail on "The Martian."

  16. Re:Who gives a shit? by damnbunni · · Score: 1

    Like hell it isn't. While I more or less live under a rock where game streamers and YouTubers are concerned, even I know that the top-earning ones make more than ten million bucks a year off ad revenue and whatnot.

    That's certainly value for the Skatteverket, at the very least.

  17. Re:Who gives a shit? by damnbunni · · Score: 1

    Everyone has a use for drives like this. Even grandmothers.

    In fact, I installed an SSD for my elderly mom and she was shocked at how much faster and more pleasant her computer was to use. She couldn't believe all I'd done was copy her stuff to the new drive and install it.

    An SSD matters more than a faster CPU or craploads of RAM to the average computer user.

  18. Re: Who gives a shit? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This.

    Your PCs nonvolatile storage is one of the last things you can upgrade these days and notice a big difference in performance (the other being the GPU.)

    I personally am still running an old sandy bridge i7 2600k CPU, and just hacked my UEFI to support booting to NVMe in order to use this ssd because it makes no sense to replace the motherboard/CPU/ram when they work perfectly fine.

    Another fun thing about these is that there's no further use for drive bays, so you can totally gut them out and install two slow turning 240mm fans in the front of your case to make your PC silent.

  19. Re:TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    George.

  20. This product is a bomb! by GerardAtJob · · Score: 1

    Ahahah tx Samsung

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
  21. Re:This FP fo8 GNAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the good old days when trolls actually cared about their craft.

  22. Re: Who gives a shit? by fixxxer0 · · Score: 1

    just curious what mobo you have and how you got it to boot? I also have an old OC'd 2600k with no real incentive to upgrade, but am considering the 960EVO as a boot drive. I have an asus p67 pro but it doesn't look like it supports it out of the box. if you get this system up and running, i'm curious to see how it benchmarks on such old hardware vs the standards.

  23. What the fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who is posting corporate press releases as stories? What happened to product news being posted by real people who had actual experience with the product? This corporate whoring is bullshit.

  24. Re: Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Research shows that noisy background noise is good for humans.

  25. Re: Who gives a shit? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    I am interested too... How you done the bios hack?

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  26. If nothing else, 256KB on USB/network/sdcard by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I don't know what GP did, but you can put a bootloader called "grub" on a USB or SD card and tell it to boot Windows from some other drive. The BIOS/EFI boots grub, which is just a few kilobytes, then grub takes over. The grub entry looks something like:

    menuentry "Windows" {
            insmod chain
            insmod ntfs
            set root=(hd1,1)
            chainloader +1
    }

  27. Re: Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone will notice the upgrade from HDD to a cheap SSD, but this is around 60% more expensive than low end SSDs and the difference is not nearly as significant as HDD->cheap SSD for the 'grandmother' use case.

  28. Re:Who gives a shit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    An SSD matters more than a faster CPU or craploads of RAM to the average computer user.

    The absolutely most important thing is to get up to a basic minimum amount of RAM, which is at least 2GB and more likely 4GB. It's pretty rare to see less any more but it does still happen, especially on Android devices... which, yes, really do need 2GB RAM. After that, storage speed is most important.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Re: Who gives a shit? by steelersin07 · · Score: 1
  30. This is nice, but... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    This is all well and good, and I'd love to put one in the desktop system. The shame is that fewer devices are shipping with M.2 slots anymore. I bought an Acer C720 Chromebook specifically because it does have such a slot, though it supports only SATA III and 2242 drives. What will this fit in other than a desktop? Small form factor boxes, yes, but otherwise... not much, in the future. And that's just a shame.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:This is nice, but... by ledow · · Score: 1

      https://www.amazon.co.uk/StarT...

      https://www.scan.co.uk/product...

      Two seconds of Googling and I solved all your problems.

      P.S. Literally the first hits on Google - many alternate, better quality, cheaper, etc. products exist.

    2. Re:This is nice, but... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      You have totally missed my point. I said it's good for the desktop. Small form factor PCs are shipping with M.2 slots so it's good there too. What I was lamenting is the loss of M.2 slots from notebooks, where everything is going to soldered-on and non-upgradable. That is where I would really want to use one of these, though they'd have to get the size down to 2260 at least, and preferably 2242. I expect I'll keep my hacked Chromebook around for years just because it's among the last of its breed -- thin, light, compact, with good battery life, yet with upgradable storage.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    3. Re:This is nice, but... by m.dillon · · Score: 1

      Please note that the Acer C720's M.2 slot is really an mSATA slot. It is not a NGFF slot (it is the older two-slot form factor that farms out SATA, not PCIe). You probably cannot stuff a NVMe card into it.

      On these small PCs the mobos often have slots for WIFI cards, which are another form factor entirely and also not NVMe compatible.

      -Matt

    4. Re:This is nice, but... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      This is true, the slot is SATA III only. However, last I checked, there were no NVMe SSDs in 2242 form factor anyhow. 2260, yes, but the C720 only has space for a 2242.

      Also the mPCIe connector is generally missing, although it is included on the ones intended for WWAN use. There is a hack out there that turns the missing mPCIe contacts into an extra USB port, but I fear neither my hands nor my eyes are up to the task any longer.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    5. Re:This is nice, but... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      You do have some Asus options for instance but from a cursory look, you also have to worry about Atom and Celeron-branded Atom with soldered RAM (some machines with the Celeron Atom and one So-DIMM slot do exist, at least 14" ones). You can get 4GB soldered RAM, lousy but works.
      Some have a 500GB hard drive so you can just use any 2.5" SSD (or specifically a 7mm one) although perhaps you'll find Celeron N 3050/3060 to be too slow. In years coming new generations of AMD soldered CPU might be useful : they both compete with Atom / Celeron Atom and Celeron/Pentium that end in U.

  31. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say 4GB is minimum, especially with Windows 7, since the Windows update process enjoys taking up at least 2GB just to check for updates.

  32. Re:TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ringo!!!

  33. Starting to see more motherboards with M.2/NGFF by m.dillon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's nice to finally start seeing more motherboards with M.2/NGFF slots on the motherboard. So far most of the offerings have only one slot, and still sport way more SATA connectors than anyone needs. But I expect the offerings to get better through 2017.

    Another thing to note is that there is a new 2.5" drive form factor... same dimensions as a 2.5" SATA drive, but with a different connector, which allows more substantial 2.5" form factor SSDs to use NVMe. There is also a new on-motherboard connector standard for the new 2.5" drive interfacing that makes use of a blocky SAS connector (but is not SAS... is PCIe for NVMe interconnect), and there are motherboards available now with one of these on them. And, again, in 2017 I fully expect motherboards to start coming out with more of these connectors.

    In the mean time you can get standard PCIe cards that farm-out the correct connector for what you need (either the NGFF connector or the SAS connector). Please note that BIOSes for motherboards without native connectors probably do NOT support booting from NVMe, and if they do it will be UEFI booting only (no legacy booting from NVMe).

    Just by way of information: M.2/NGFF is basically just a PCIe bus in a different format. It's a compact 4-lane PCIe bus format. However, there are *FOUR* different connector styles for M.2-style connectors, called by various names (M.2, NGFF, mSATA, mWIFI, and other crap). Be very careful to buy stuff that matches up. You want the NGFF connector (also known as M.2, but NGFF is the modern term for it and will be less confusing). This connector has one notch to one side and one hold-down screw at the end of the board along the center-line.

    Another thing to be careful of is that a bunch of vendors have NGFF boards that are *NOT* NVMe. The boards actually have a SATA controller on-board and will attach via AHCI. Examples include Kingston HyperX and Plextor. All the Samsung products are NVMe.

    For low-cost NVMe, another alternative to the 950 Pro is the somewhat older Samsung NVME SM951.

    Most of these NGFF NVMe boards are capable of doing 3 GBytes/sec reading (deep queue). Writing will be a lot slower, even slower than a typical SATA SSD due to having fewer flash chips. Also, 3 GBytes/sec is if you plug it into a PCIe-v3 slot. Most machines out there today will have PCIe-v2 slots and performance will be more in the 1.5 GBytes/sec range. It is still fast as hell reading.

    -Matt

  34. Re: Who gives a shit? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    I have an Asus P8Z77-V Pro. What you have to do is insert the NVMe UEFI module into a bios image provided by your manufacturer (for i.e. bios updates.) If you do that, you don't need to do any kind of grub bootstrapping or anything like that.

    Some motherboards normally won't flash a bios image that isn't signed (it's a safety feature,) and mine is one of those, so you have to take advantage of the failed flash recovery feature, in my case it was putting the bios image on a fat32 USB drive and pressing a button on the motherboard while the system powers on.

    The URL somebody else posted outlines really well how all of this works, but the exact steps vary from motherboard to motherboard, and you can do it with almost any motherboard that supports PCI-e 2.0 or better (though you need 3.0 or better to take advantage of the speed offered by these SSDs.)

    By the way, M.2 is literally just a small form factor PCI-e x4. Any adapter will work just as well as another, regardless of price, as it's basically just a shim. I paid $17 for mine on Amazon:

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d...

  35. Re:TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gracie.

  36. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Windows 7 VM which doesn't need much RAM at all, I found 896 MB to be enough. I've also see it run with 768 MB on real hardware. But the ability of Windows Update to get stuck scares me enough that I give the VM almost 3 GB instead. The program I run in that VM is perhaps a bit old fashioned : it uses 50 MB. Wow!
    Thinking a Windows 10 VM might save me a ton of RAM, if it updates reliably on 1GB. But, damn you Microsoft. I don't even want to pirate your OS anymore. Perhaps I'll try a Windows Server 2016 desktop but I don't feel like caring for now.

  37. Re:Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does run well on a slow single core CPU, 3GB RAM and the smallest SATA hard drive I could find.
    Also, the classic theme puts it in sort of a legacy graphics mode so it virtually always works properly. So, you can run Windows 7 on really crappy or old hardware but it pretty much need to be a ddr2 system. A ddr1 system can use 3GB of RAM, but you need relatively valuable 1GB sticks of ddr1 (three 1GB sticks, or two 1GB sticks and two 512 MB sticks if you happen to have four slots). If you only have two ddr1 slots, well the computer is fucked, unless you want Windows for a non-networked retro gaming system. But some linux mint with Mate or any linux distro with (Mate, Xfce, LXDE) will run fine with 1GB RAM and a ublock + badger Firefox.

  38. quad M.2 carrier PCIe boards for retrofits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Amfeltec in Canada has a PCIexpress carrier board capable of holding 4 M.2 sticks with a proper PLX PCIe switch.

    http://amfeltec.com/squid-pci-express-carrier-boards-for-m-2-ssd-modules/?view=list

    PCIe gen2 version allows a choice between x4/x8/x16 for the uplink, newer one is PCIe gen3 x8 or x16. If you run fully populated with 4 M.2 sticks at below x16 uplink though, you do end up sharing bandwidth between sticks due to the bottlenecked uplink, but unless you are doing something extreme, you probably won't notice, and you end up essentially running an internal PCIe expander inside your PC for not excessive prices (well, Avago is charging much more for PLX chips these days than they used to) compared to normal external PCIe expanders (which are fairly expensive) .

    Also need to run some sort of software RAID to use at extreme performance. Windows 10 Storage Spaces now allows doing interesting stuff like using SSD's as accelerators for HDD software RAID as read caches (write too?), so having 4 M.2 sticks with two as a software RAID0 and the other 2 as accelerator SSD's for a 4xHDD software RAID10 is a lot easier now. Hell, it is possible (though obnoxious) to make Windows use it's own software RAID1 for the boot disk as well (need 10 Pro and do conventional mirror, not Storage Spaces, need to be real careful to properly copy all hidden partitions and doing the dynamic disk conversion after).

    The following is the guide to do software mirror boot disk for windows 2012 but should apply.
    http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/E/E/6EE26977-FAA0-41CC-8BDA-7A0C5E6EB9CC/Configuring%20Disk%20Mirroring%20for%20Windows%20Server%202012.docx

  39. Re:Who gives a shit? by messymerry · · Score: 1

    Audio and video production... ;-D

    --
    Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!