Slashdot Mirror


Google Joins Microsoft's .NET Foundation (venturebeat.com)

Emil Protalinski, writing for VentureBeat:As part of its slew of announcements at its Connect(); 2016 developer event in New York City today, Microsoft unveiled that Google is joining the .NET Foundation. Specifically, Google is becoming a member of the Technical Steering Group, which Microsoft says "reinforces the vibrancy of the .NET developer community" and also underlines "Google's commitment to fostering an open platform that supports businesses and developers who have standardized on .NET." [...] So what does Google joining actually mean? In short, Google will help steer the future of .NET in a way that is "similar to an open standard," Xamarin cofounder and Microsoft's current vice president of mobile developer tools, Nat Friedman, told VentureBeat. Google's decision is being driven by its enterprise business (Google Cloud) and the desire to keep up with businesses adopting public and hybrid clouds. The company sees the move as part of its commitment to open-source technology, which benefits all enterprises, and cross-platform development that gives developers and IT professionals access to the best tools.

93 comments

  1. Lots of love today... by rwven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft joins the Linux foundation, Google joins the .NET foundation. What's next? Hillary joins the Trump Foundation?

    1. Re:Lots of love today... by duckintheface · · Score: 1

      Yep. The lion lies down with the lamb. Bozo the Clown is elected President. Signs of the apocalypse.

      --
      "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
    2. Re:Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You went full retard. Never go full retard.

    3. Re:Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that it's impossible for Trump to have lost the popular vote? It's impossible for somebody to lose something that didn't happen. When the presidential election changes to a popular vote, then your ill considered statement will hold some water.

    4. Re:Lots of love today... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Neither candidate for POTUS in 2016 won a majority of the popular vote.

    5. Re:Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't competing for the popular vote. They were competing for the presidency and he won it convincingly. Deal with it.

    6. Re:Lots of love today... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That would be Hillarious!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Lots of love today... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Why not, she went to his wedding.

    8. Re:Lots of love today... by haruchai · · Score: 0

      The GOP went full retard years ago and have gotten the electorate to follow, led by the 1st Orange-American President.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    9. Re:Lots of love today... by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      Neither candidate for POTUS in 2016 won a majority of the popular vote.

      Ok, ok, if you want to pick knits, he didn't win the largest block of popular votes.

    10. Re:Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem you're the one with issues that can't accept the election results. Deal with it or move to Mexico.

    11. Re:Lots of love today... by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 0

      It would seem you're the one with issues that can't accept the election results. Deal with it or move to Mexico.

      In other words you are confirming that I did hit a Fuckface Von Nervestick by pointing out he won even though he was the runner up ... note to self: poke that nerve in every future conversations with Trump supporters.

    12. Re:Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry moar. Trump won by a landslide fair and square according to the rules that have been in use since the founding of the country. If you don't like them, why didn't you take action to change them a long time ago?

    13. Re:Lots of love today... by Marsoupial · · Score: 3

      "Those people who have a different viewpoint than me are mentally retarded, and their leader is physically unattractive to boot, which further lends credence to my viewpoint."

    14. Re: Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You too are jealous bums. Don't be, next time try and run for president, using your own money.

      You have 2-3 years to make 50 millions, so get started.

    15. Re: Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, GOP?

      You liberals inventing bullshit as you go. Poor lesbian bastards.

    16. Re:Lots of love today... by unixisc · · Score: 0

      Microsoft joins the Linux foundation, Google joins the .NET foundation. What's next? Hillary joins the Trump Foundation?

      Or Trump can demand membership in the Clinton Foundation given that he had donated to them in the past.

      Or maybe not

    17. Re:Lots of love today... by xvan · · Score: 1

      Imagine that you're playing basketball for the presidency, and Trump wins by 2 points, but he has more triples during the match.

      After the match you say, Hilary scored more shots than Trump.

      Everybody sane argues that they were playing basketball to decide, and that the winner is decided by points not shots scored. In an alternate reality where the game is decided by shots, Both teams would have played different and you don't know who would have won.

      You called that people Fuckface, and shout that the game is rigged.

    18. Re: Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He-she pledged to move to Canada-Mexico if Trump wins. Now, he-she backpedals and can't deal with it.

    19. Re:Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump foundation might be just a subsidiary of NRA or KKK. Anyway, this Google move is just a move to avoid antitrust lawsuits. How could they be dominating mobile space when they are supporting other OS' too?

    20. Re:Lots of love today... by megamind · · Score: 1

      I feel like I am living in an alternate reality.

    21. Re:Lots of love today... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      FWIW, ignorance is not something to be worn on your sleeve with pride (unless you're just trolling, in which case you've done a great job).

      In the event you're not just trolling masterfully, and require education, there IS no "national popular vote" for the US presidency, because there is not one election, but rather fifty-one elections. One of the (admittedly quirky) checks and balances in our system which is designed to help keep large states from running roughshod over small states. Strictly speaking, there doesn't need to be a popular election at all. Each state can appoint its electors in the manner it sees fit. All of them, today, choose to do so by popular vote, but there's nothing that keeps, say, Oregon from deciding tomorrow that from now on, they're going to have the legislature do it, or draw lots, or read goat entrails, or whatever.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    22. Re:Lots of love today... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "Those people who have a different viewpoint than me are mentally retarded, and their leader is physically unattractive to boot, which further lends credence to my viewpoint."

      And here's the proof - Trump led the birther campaign, claimed his crack(-smoking?) investigative team were discovering so many wonderful, beautiful things in Hawaii......and revealed what?? And then, on the cusp of winning the election summarily declares that Obama was born in America.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    23. Re:Lots of love today... by RandomFactor · · Score: 1

      If you want to make that statement you need to have the early/mail-in ballots counted. Even if they won't swing the election.

      In this case, a slight weighting on those (which I understand is typical) and you could turn out to be incorrect.

      I vaguely recall something about news organizations doing their own recounts back in the 2000 election. Wonder if there are any constraints to a group pulling the mail-in ballots and counting them?

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    24. Re:Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next? Hillary joins the Trump Foundation?

      I'm not sure mere concrete would be enough to contain her...

    25. Re: Lots of love today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggot

  2. My prediction for the next story on Slashdot: by lxs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple joins the Open Source Hardware Association.

    1. Re:My prediction for the next story on Slashdot: by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Followed by: The Open Source Hardware Association now mandates industrial glue and non-upgradable parts as standard design requirements.

    2. Re:My prediction for the next story on Slashdot: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Followed by : The Open Source Hardware Association is now closed source and proprietary. Lawsuits pending.

  3. What will happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft can push their own thing for decades at a time until they get enough support to become somewhat a standard.
    Google usually create their own things and then discontinue them after only a few months.

    Will the two combine? Does that mean .NET will be dead within a year?

    1. Re:What will happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft will keep it alive for decades. Google will kill it within months... .Net will be undead soon, and it will eat your brain. (It already ate mine. I've been developing with it professionally for the last 10+ years.)

  4. The mothership is here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drink the koolaid and ascend to the mothership!

  5. What day is it? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 0

    Is my calendar of by five months?

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  6. all together now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now everyone is in everyone elses' foundation. Haven't I heard this 'foundation' thing somewhere else?
    Should we be worried? I already wonder about the push to code...no one ever says code what.

    1. Re:all together now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now everyone is in everyone elses' foundation. Haven't I heard this 'foundation' thing somewhere else?

      It's a popular front end framework.

  7. Black holes of pure evil merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The result can't be good.

    Microsoft, .NET, and Google? If they can somehow rope Oracle into the mix, they'd have the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,.

    1. Re:Black holes of pure evil merge by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they do, then our only hope is that Adobe also joins them and brings them down with code bloat and security holes.

    2. Re:Black holes of pure evil merge by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      But I thought they already had Microsoft, don't they?

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    3. Re:Black holes of pure evil merge by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Ain't .NET a part of Microsoft? Or did I miss something?

    4. Re:Black holes of pure evil merge by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MSFT quit trying to poorly ape Apple when they got rid of the sweaty monkey and instead are trying to poorly ape Google, complete with all their spying, under Nutella?

      Ever since Nutella took over MSFT has been opening up their software and tools because now you are the product just as you are with Google. This means if Google or Torvalds or anybody else wants to use .NET go right ahead, no nasty contracts anymore because their money isn't coming from software but from your data instead. Whether you consider this an improvement or not is up to you but with the majority of Americans happy to hand their data and every detail of their personal lives to companies like FB? It appears like it or not that is the future of software.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Black holes of pure evil merge by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      The result can't be good.

      Microsoft, .NET, and Google? If they can somehow rope Oracle into the mix, they'd have the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,.

      The four horsemen of the apocalypse approach.

      War: Oracle, for suing nonstop.
      Famine: Google, for never being able to satisfy themselves by making/buying services (eating) then abandoning them.
      Pestilence: Microsoft, for being ubiquitous and spreading itself like a plague.
      Death: Adobe, for killing off it's suite and making it a yearly subscription, and for having a death cliff learning curve second only to Dwarf Fortress.

  8. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, Google is embracing Microsoft? Isn't this what most here would celebrate, Microsoft being extinguished? *is confused*

  9. Re:EEE by dontbemad · · Score: 0

    Stop this shit, seriously. This EEE mentality died with Ballmer's departure, and if you have been even remotely paying attention to this company, you will have seen that all of the FOSS contributions that M$FT has been making have been legitmate because their business model doesn't rely on them anymore.

    I get that you have some reservations about trusting the company, and admittedly, I am primarily a .Net developer. But still, your ostrich-like "keep my head in the sand and ignore the reality around me" mentality is just depressing. I am excited about more and more of these tools becoming Open Source and multi-platform, because it not only benefits me, but all of my fellow developers. What possible benefit could M$FT reap from openly joining open source teams, accepting contributions, and building up platforms, only to renege at a later date and say "now pay us money!"? Setting aside the LITANY of lawsuits that it would bring, it wouldn't make any financial sense, since 90% of the tools they are releasing support languages and platforms that are already FOSS.

    Time for you to wake up and face reality. Microsoft is focusing on a cloud-first business model, and that means removing barriers for people who want to use said cloud-services. They are only hurting themselves by keeping their tools and platforms closed and Windows-only.

  10. Dogs and Cats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read several people claim that if Trump won it would be dogs and cats living together. I didn't realize it would be quite so literal.

  11. Another step towards the end of Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure Oracle had nothing to do with this

  12. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    By who, Google or Microsoft?

    I suspect that Google is interested in finding a fallback to let them replace Java in Android. I forget what Oracle's current legal tactic is but they're still doing something to try and sue Google for using Java in Android with paying them massive amounts of money. What Oracle doesn't seem to realize is that Android is one of the last Java strongholds. Thanks to Oracle's mishandling of the platform, a lot of Java shops started looking elsewhere. (Or maybe Oracle does realize, and this is their last ditch attempt to make money off the Java purchase.)

    If Google makes Android .Net-based going forward, it could finally kill Java entirely. I'm not saying Google is going to do that, but I would bet that they're going to make it an option, allowing Android apps to be written in either Java or .Net "natively." (Because you can currently use .Net to write Android apps, I just mean as "first party" option.) They may even "port" the .Net runtime library to Java so that Android apps wouldn't be using Oracle's APIs at all.

    I see this more as a strategic move against Oracle than anything else.

  13. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop this shit, seriously. ....

    Says the guy who posts "M$FT"....

  14. 10 LET M$ = "Microsoft" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Says the guy who posts "M$FT"....

    Before MS-DOS, Microsoft was known for interpreters of line-numbered BASIC, where all string variable names ended with $. Someone probably just forgot the

    10 LET M$ = "MICROSO"

  15. Re:EEE by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    I thought all the browsers were phasing out npapi and that java was pretty much done at this point. {except javascript}

  16. just stop it. by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    now you're just fucking with us 2016
    I'm tired of this crap. Have you run out of beloved pop culture icons to kill off?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  17. To fight Oracle by tepples · · Score: 1

    My first thought was that Microsoft and Google were joining to fight Oracle. If Microsoft and Google make the .NET Framework appear more open than the Java platform and less of a legal risk, Java will become deprecated in new designs. Then that's one fewer Rich American Called Larry Ellison that we have to worry about.

    1. Re:To fight Oracle by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      I always thought the A stood for asshole?

    2. Re:To fight Oracle by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Then that's one fewer Rich American Called Larry Ellison that we have to worry about.

      Oh god, you mean there's more than one rich asshole named Larry Ellison? One was more than enough!

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  18. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This EEE mentality died with Ballmer's departure

    I was there when Bill departed. The attitudes didn't change much then because they already permeated the culture within the company. Changing the guy on the top doesn't change the attitudes of the managers who manage managers who manage developers. I'm not saying MSFT will never change, but I am saying that MSFT cannot change in an instant. Maybe 10-15 years from now, I'll tentatively extend a little trust again. (...and I feel pretty generous saying that.)

  19. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are cloud moves by both companies. .NET will never be on Android and why would it? There's a lot better languages to use than C#.

  20. Java's last stronghold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android is Java's last stronghold? WTF? Do you develop webapps? I can assure you that Java dominates the server side there and for good technical reasons.

    It's fine if you prefer other technologies and work in them, but don't project your ideal fantasy as fact. Java on the server will be with us for a long time to come.

    1. Re:Java's last stronghold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java on the server is already dying, mainly due to Oracle's failures to lead in that space. For whatever reason, Oracle doesn't care about Java on the server anymore. Or on the desktop. Or in the mobile. Or, really, at all, except as a cudgel to beat Google with.

      While I'm sure that Java will remain on the server for quite some time to come, a lot of places are looking into options to get rid of it, because Oracle doesn't seem to care about supporting it any more. There's a lot of legacy code lying around, but I'm currently involved in multiple projects that are taking existing Java-based webapps and rewriting them on different platforms because of fears about Oracle abandoning Java entirely.

      One of these includes rewriting a Java webapp in PHP - people are THAT desperate to replace Java!

    2. Re: Java's last stronghold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The absolute worst thing that could happen is Java doesn't get any updates past the current release of 1.8. I don't see how the latest PHP is going to be an improvrment over that. Also keep in mind that many of the best things about Java are third party, frequently open source, libraries and frameworks. Those are neither tied to Oracle nor to the Java language version.

  21. Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft? by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    Could this really be Google pulling an "embrace, extend, extinguish" maneuver on Microsoft? That would be awesome because payback is long overdue.

    What with this, and the recent announcement that Microsoft have joined the Linux foundation as a Platinum member, I'm wondering what hideous love-child we will see emerge.

    I'm desperately hoping that Google will at least have the sense to keep Microsoft completely away from the Android kernel and system.

  22. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This EEE mentality died with Ballmer's departure

    How's that working out for Nokia's phone division?

  24. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I agree with you, a lot of /. posters have their identity tied to this. They need to be anti-Microsoft and pro-Linux. To do otherwise threatens who they are.

    These people will forever lurk in the fog of the past, waiting for Microsoft to screw up or make some poorly worded press release. A half century from now Microsoft will an error and they all come lurching out of the dark, like Zombies. "See! I told you so! A half century, they all said I was mad, but now you see! Embrace, extend, extinguish! Bill Gates is the Anti-Christ! Braaaaiiiiinnnssss!!!"

  25. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hideous love-child

    systemd/windows registry

    I'm still expecting a simultaneous acquisition of docker and redhat while microsoft still have revenue to cover it.

  26. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, Google is embracing Microsoft? Isn't this what most here would celebrate, Microsoft being extinguished? *is confused*

    It's good to see Microsoft being embraced for one.
    This looks like a classic case of "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer."

  27. Re: EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like what? C# is superior to Java. And please don't say some scripting language.

  28. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    I'm more hoping they intend to give the finger to Oracle by making C# a first class citizen on Android, and deprecating Java.

    C# is a better language anyway, and Google's adoption of Java has kept a language on life support that... well, it's not a terrible language, but it has a Donald Trump of an owner if you know what I mean. Better to move on to something both technically superior and politically undamaged.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  29. "Similar to an open standard" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but cringe when I read that.

    1. Re:"Similar to an open standard" by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Like somewhat pregnant

  30. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    I'm more hoping they intend to give the finger to Oracle by making C# a first class citizen on Android, and deprecating Java.

    C# is a better language anyway, and Google's adoption of Java has kept a language on life support that... well, it's not a terrible language, but it has a Donald Trump of an owner if you know what I mean. Better to move on to something both technically superior and politically undamaged.

    To say that Google's adoption has kept Java in life support is a bit of a stretch. Do people realize the sheer volume of software written in Java? Java in the Enterprise exists on its own. Android could stop existing today, and it would have no impact on Java's viability.

    With that said, I agree with you. C# is superior as a language than Java. Having worked in both, that's the opinion I've formed regarding both. Either is fine for the job, though I'd prefer C# to become more widely available outside Microsoft platforms.

  31. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Oh dear god please no. .net sucks ass.

  32. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would they do that though, when they have a perfectly good language in Golang, which they developed in-house? Though its object model and interface-based rather than inheritance-based design means the Android API library would need to be rewritten extensively... who knows what they're up to here.

    But fully-supported, native golang API for android-based phones would rock. It would remove any JIT/VM performance bottlenecks too (I honestly have no idea if that's an issue any more, but just sayin'.)

  33. C# vs. Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C# and Java are pretty close in what they offer as languages. The library and framework ecosystem, on the other hand, is far richer in Java.

    1. Re:C# vs. Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having coded for years in both languages, C# is pretty close to Java except it isn't.

      C# is much closer to Scala than Java these days and has been since v3.5. Java is not the JVM - the JVM is great, but Java hasn't moved on much since open sourced. I really like the ability to read a file in one verbose line rather than 8, but if java could just get a tad more pragmatic that would help. Let's continue with multi-line strings.

      But let's not kid ourselves, Java is quite a verbose language with second class generics. It was great for '95 and as a teaching language it's great, but for getting the job done? C# just works.

    2. Re:C# vs. Java by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

      C# just works.

      Is that because the IDE now runs on Apple hardware? :P

    3. Re: C# vs. Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java now has lambdas with type inference and streams for programming in a more concise and functional style. I have no idea how on earth you can claim it hasn't changed, unless you haven't programmed in it for the past couple years.

    4. Re:C# vs. Java by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      But most of that ecosystem does not apply to Android.

    5. Re: C# vs. Java by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Java did lambdas like it did generics - half-assed. Look at this crap:

      https://docs.oracle.com/javase...

      DoubleToIntFunction, LongToDouble function etc. All the permutations had to be written by hand, and if you write a library that uses lambdas, you'll have to do the same.

      And why? Because that's the only way to define a function type that won't box its arguments (since generics are still type-erased, and will result in boxing). Which is what you normally want for the sake of performance.

      In C#, there's just Action and Func generic delegates, for up to 16 parameter types.

    6. Re: C# vs. Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Academic arguments.

      In Java we use objects for everything (not primitives), and performance is very fast for a language of its class, a class that includes C#.

      For number crunching code, if ultimate speed is your overriding concern, you write it in C or Fortran--not Java, not C#.

      It's funny that you think your C# with its garbage collection, object metadata, and intermediate rather than native code representation (basically byte code) running in a VM is some standard for "high performance"!

    7. Re: C# vs. Java by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, the performance is "not very fast". If that were the case, java.util.function namespace, and all those interfaces in it, wouldn't have existed. But it does, because perf sucks, and you need hacks like that to make it decent.

      This has nothing to do with number crunching, by the way. This is more about memory pressure than CPU perf. If you box every integer on every lambda call, that's a lot for GC to clean up.

      And all the things that you list for C# are also true for Java. Except C# generally has better versions of all of them.

    8. Re: C# vs. Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent said:
      "And all the things that you list for C# are also true for Java."

      Now you are getting my point. They are far, far more alike than they are different.

    9. Re: C# vs. Java by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I never disputed that. C# was always a "better Java". Back when it was at 1.0, the differences were largely syntactical. But C# improved much faster than Java did, mainly because the design team is less conservative, and also because it wasn't quite as much mired in backwards compatibility. So by now, it has a great many features that Java doesn't have or only recently got (and as a consequence, the C# ecosystem has been using those features for a long time - there aren't many Java libraries designed around lambdas, for example, but in C# they've been around for 8 years now), and for those features that both languages do have, C# implementation of them is generally better.

      At this point, it makes a lot more sense to just leave Java be, and treat it like we treat COBOL - as a language that served its purpose well in its due time, and is on legacy support now due to all the code that was written in it, but which doesn't need to be evolved. And run with C# (or one of the other newer contenders, like Kotlin) for future evolution.

  34. Re:EEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This EEE mentality died with Ballmer's departure

    How's that working out for Nokia's phone division?

    It seems you need to get educated on what "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" means, because their Nokia acquisition wasn't that at all.

  35. Re:EEE by exomondo · · Score: 1

    This is the Embrace phase...

    Phase of what? The only thing "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" has ever been tied to is Java and HTML web standards, so if that is anything to go buy then attributing EEE to something is the precursor to that thing becoming hugely popular and widely used and adopted.

    People here said the same thing about Microsoft's contributions to the Linux kernel and hey what do you know, those people were wrong again. Though it shouldn't be surprising given so many in the community broadly dismissed products like the iPad and iPhone, prophesized about the popularity of open source consoles like Ouya, constantly predict the death of Microsoft and the Year of the Linux desktop. Frankly if you want to know what the trend in technology is just look at the prevailing opinion on slashdot and know that it's the opposite of that.

  36. don't click "Is this Genuine Linux?" button by swschrad · · Score: 1

    CCclippy will erase your drive.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  37. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Golang, yes next we can start using screwdriver for nails and hammer for screws.

  38. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by just+another+AC · · Score: 1

    Oh dear god please no. .net sucks ass.

    That's a very unemotional and informative analysis you have done there. I feel so much more enlightened from reading it.
    And what language should I code in, that does not "suck ass" and is a suitable substitution?

    Personally of all the languages I have been made to code in, C# has been amongst the least sucky.

  39. Re:Google doing an embrace and extend on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this really be Google pulling an "embrace, extend, extinguish" maneuver on Microsoft? That would be awesome because payback is long overdue.

    Welcome to slashdot, a place for nerds to share their wet dreams.

    Honestly the slashdot knows so little about technology coporations and has such a phenomenal ability to predict the complete opposite of what will happen in the industry that it is an embarassment. Hey where is that year of the linux desktop? Nowhere to be seen. Microsoft's been 'embracing, extending and extinguishing' everything right? Oh no they havent. The iPod died in favor of the Nomad huh? Ooh wrong again.

    Maybe rather than postulating about coporations not doing what you want you should actually build something worthwhile yourself. Desktop Linux is a mess, hundreds of distributions and not a single one that any significant amount of people want to even use for free, Windows fucking Vista was more used than all the hundreds of linux distributions combined. If that isn't a wake up call that you're doing pretty much everything wrong then you must be pretty much braindead.