Slashdot Mirror


Buying Stuff On Your Phone Still Sucks (cnet.com)

Despite all the advancements smartphone companies have made on the phone, desktop platforms continue to be their preferred way to buy stuff online. CNET spoke with a number of people who not only confirmed that they bought things using a laptop or a desktop computer, but also listed the reasons why they don't use their smartphones to do big transactions. From the report: For now, though, buying stuff on a phone is often terrible, so at least for this Cyber Monday you're likely still buying stuff on a laptop, with its big screen and full physical keyboard. While people are buying on mobile websites and apps a lot more -- up 65 percent from last year -- consumers are three times more likely to complete a purchase on a PC than a phone, according to an Adobe mobile retail report released last month. That's resulted in PCs bringing in 75 percent of retailers' online sales this year, versus just 16 percent from phones, the report said. To consumers, phone screens are too small, pinch-to-zoom features aren't available in mobile apps, it's hard to find things easily, and checkout using that tiny touchscreen keyboard is a pain. When people do buy on mobile, they make smaller purchases than on desktops, Adobe found. Retailers stand to lose billions of dollars in sales if they don't get their act together, Adobe said. And consumers will continue to be frustrated when trying to buy.

102 comments

  1. Mobile websites & apps suck by DatbeDank · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm loathe to do anything other than look up stuff on a small device. Mobile websites and apps are crap with very limited interfaces.

    1. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      ...Mobile websites and apps are crap with very limited interfaces.

      ...and if they had the same interface (and I mean the same interface, not just the same options presented differently), you'd complain that you had to pinch/zoom all the time.

    2. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. That would be fine.

    3. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Mobile websites ....are crap with very limited interfaces.

      And Slashdot falls into that group as well.

      When I use my iPad to read Slashdot I always manually revert back to the desktop site after I have been kicked to the mobile site.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

      Since I have no mod points at the moment. I'll just respond with FLAMEBAIT!

    5. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The worst feature I find on mobile sites is the fact that instead of paging you just keep scrolling to view items.

      Then when I click on something to add to cart and click back I need to scroll for two minutes to get back where I was on the list.

      Why they don't let me load all on one page, or page through the items like on desktop sites is beyond me.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fact that with the inner workings of most phone/os/app ecosystems being completely closed off (and at least in the case of Android, incredibly fragmented across various versions/vendors), we have no idea if our devices are up to date and secure or completely compromised. Frankly, I avoid using my phone for anything require secure financial transactions.

    7. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Retailers stand to lose billions of dollars in sales if they don't get their act together,

      And how exactly are they going to do that? What magic wand will solve the problem?

      Here's a radical thought:

      Maybe, just maybe, a device with a 5 inch screen and no keyboard ISN'T SUITABLE FOR USE AS A GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTER, YOU STUPID FUCK

    8. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      It's not just pinch and zoom...

      Tell you what - go to Newegg's mobile site sometime. It's one of the better mobile sites for buying stuff, but I still hate using it, so I don't. Besides the mobile site (most typical ones, anyway) often being very slow to load fully (even on 4G with full bars), having to scroll like crazy just to narrow the filtering options down is a raging PITA sometimes. It's a much, much faster and smoother experience on the laptop (even over Satellite Internet, FFS).

      Many mobile sites are like this if the products they sell are even halfway as complex.

      Sure, buying a T-shirt (choosing color, size, maybe long/short sleeve options) on the phone is drop-simple, but buying something with a lot of different options (like a laptop for instance) gets to be a bit of a rough experience, enough that I don't even bother unless I have a lot of time/battery to waste on it.

      I don't blame Newegg (or similar) per se, because getting the UX right on a tiny screen is hard work as it is - it gets exponentially harder when the complexity of the purchase goes up. I do however blame the fact that a lot of this can be alleviated with a bit of cooperation by the carriers (seriously, Verizon - upgrade your shiz once in awhile and stop oversubscribing), and a bit of skull sweat on the part of the site designers.

      Some ideas (aimed at no one in particular)?
      * stop using so many fucking scripts/cookies/trackers/etc on the site - each one takes time to load, and mobile bandwidth often sucks. The longer it takes for the thing to load, the greater the chance your user will tell you to piss off and not make the purchase.
      * clean up the interface (...more!)
      * spend more than five minutes accounting for smaller screens. Not everyone has a tablet - sized phone, FFS.
       

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    9. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by tepples · · Score: 1

      Perhaps retailers want to try selling to people who can afford their products but not "A GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTER" or a separate Internet access subscription therefor, or people who are on the go but don't want to carry a big heavy bag whose design screams "THIS IS A GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTER; PLEASE ROB ME". Over the course of my present job alone, I've seen coworkers in both categories.

    10. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I run classic slashdot on all my devices and stay logged in. Slashdot Web 2.0 doesn't have persistent logins across sessions without using the browsers login credentials.

      So I switch to classic login and stay there for me slashdot usage. Oddly enough I find it faster and easier to read even with random scrolls left to right or pinch to zoom to adjust size.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    11. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      * clean up the interface (...more!)

      How? Either you end up with:
      Reducing Options: UGH but I want to do X!!!
      Rearranging Options: UGH I have to scroll so much!!!
      Not optimizing at all: UGH all this pinch and zoom!!!

    12. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Hilariously, I find myself switching to the desktop views and I don't mind pinching and zooming at all! At least I have the tools I need to do what I need.

      If mobile websites and apps had all of the features available that a desktop site would then I wouldn't be complaining. 9 times out of 10 however their stripped down to the bare essentials which leave me with nothing.

    13. Re: Mobile websites & apps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing anything on a phone sucks. The only thing it has going for it is always being with me since I cannot carry a monitor with a keyboard and mouse everywhere. I have never felt the urgency to do anything important on my phone that could not wait until I arrived home.

      If I am near a desktop computer, I will choose the computer 100% of the time.

    14. Re: Mobile websites & apps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus if you spend too long looking at the little screen, your eyes are going to go all wonky.

    15. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      mobile is a compromise platform. These issues cannot be entirely optimized away. When optimal productivity is needed, nothing replaces a good pc with high pixel density monitor.

    16. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Well, then they can quit obfuscating the information that consumers want. It would save them from the researching that requires "A GENERAL PURPOSE COMPUTER" to accomplish efficiently. (good luck with that)

    17. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if a user browses a website on their phone, they should be presented with:
      "Fuck you, use a real computer"?

    18. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree, except that if you don't have the tools you need, the essentials haven't been kept!

      Of course, any tool they normally provide might be essential for some users.

      I'm thinking these days I actually just want to run desktop linux on a mobile device, with a good input application.

    19. Re: Mobile websites & apps suck by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Doing anything on a phone sucks."

      Define 'phone'? The range of devices that are given this name is expanding exponentially.

    20. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by mfearby · · Score: 1

      I don't think the comment above is flamebait at all. I agree with the sentiment entirely. I use my mobile for a few things and only a quick google or two but that's about it. I'd much rather a desktop computer where I can actually see things properly laid out, zoom in, use a real keyboard, etc.

    21. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

      Well, they didn't really address the original posters point and they made a baseless assumption. I think that fits closest to Slashdot's Flamebait description "Comments whose sole purpose is to insult and enrage."

    22. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my phone browsers were allowed to present same as my laptop, I would have no complaint. My every effort to get phone browser treated as desktop browser fails in some ways. 1920X1080 phone screen should get full desktop option.

    23. Re:Mobile websites & apps suck by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Well, if they want full flexibility, yes. Mobile is not going to give them that.

  2. Not on eBay by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 2

    Their mobile app rocks and is highly responsive (I mean in the way it provides up-to-date / real-time pricing info on auctions you are watching, not regarding UI design), which is critical when an auction is ending. It keeps people from being chained to a desktop PC, which in and of itself makes it worthwhile.

    1. Re:Not on eBay by MinaInerz · · Score: 1

      Except for the part where it refuses to remember your search preferences, hoisting the entirely useless "all listings" + "best match" search order upon you, again and again. The previous major version of the eBay app was much better in that regards, and they took out default sorting options with the current version.

  3. I worked on a retail iOS App by Altus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The experience I had at a retail shop was that tons of people would browse on the iphone using mobile web but nobody would buy there. People would buy on the desktop web, but when given the choice of buying through the app instead of the mobile web (which included a much easier checkout flow with card scanning or applepay/paypal options) they definitely were more than willing to purchase on their phones. The conversion rate for the app was considerably higher than even the desktop web conversion rate (far fewer casual browsers).

    I think its possible to get people to buy on their phones but it has to be seamless and typing into web forms is not desirable.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  4. Tablets by jabuzz · · Score: 1

    Never brought anything on a phone, brought quite a bit on a tablet though. Seems the article does not think there is anything between a full desktop/laptop and a phone, which surely everyone on slashdot is going to be puzzled by.

    1. Re:Tablets by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Same here. I don't use my phones to do anything other than when I'm away from home. But at home, I increasingly use my tablet whenever there is an app for it. There are apps for Am Ex, Citi, Discover and Chase, so I use those for monetary transactions on my Ellipsis. And the Amazon tablet app for shopping. I've stopped using Windows for doing anything that's financially important.

  5. People don't do important stuff on phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm so surprised

  6. Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much impossible to do meaningful comparison between products on a small device. I only buy using my phone when I know what I need and don't need to compare with similar products.

    1. Re:Comparison by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Pretty much impossible to do meaningful comparison between products on a small device. I only buy using my phone when I know what I need and don't need to compare with similar products.

      Yes! For most people, the computer is an ordering device and the phone is a reorder button.

  7. ONLY apps can app apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only LUDDITES try to use LUDDITE phones to buy LUDDITE junk. Modern app appers only use apps to app other apps!

    Apps!

  8. A few get it right but only a few by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I think its possible to get people to buy on their phones but it has to be seamless and typing into web forms is not desirable.

    Agreed. The only companies I've seen get mobile purchasing to a good approximation of right are Amazon, Apple and Starbucks. Pretty much every other mobile purchasing experience I've had has been needlessly annoying and/or difficult. There may be a few others doing it well that I haven't dealt with but most seem to be stuck in the 1990s with their purchasing "experience" and shopping carts.

    1. Re: A few get it right but only a few by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Amazon still has some faults.

      1) having to scroll past the products to get to the filters. There needs to be a small button at the top of the product list to display the filters immediately.

      2) trying to get to your account, or tracking page requires scrolling to the very bottom of the page. If you're on the home page, it autoloads more content as scroll and it can get frustrating.

      Not sure if all of their regional sites are exactly the same, but this is my experience with the Canadian mobile site.

  9. View Only by Luthair · · Score: 2

    Not sure about anyone else but I found that tablets and phones were only really good for quick views of things. I can't even be bothered to write email on the devices.

  10. Desktop with proper keyboard, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having to type in your shipping details on a phone touchscreen is extremely painful.

    1. Re:Desktop with proper keyboard, please. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      There are Bluetooth keyboards that can work w/ that. My thing is - I use a tablet whenever possible, and the phone only when I am on the go

    2. Re: Desktop with proper keyboard, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if it's too hard then don't type in my shipping details, type in your own

  11. Lingering effect of "only click this once" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think a lot of this has to do with the lingering effects of a hundred "don't close your browse / click refresh / click twice" warnings during that critical credit card submit/commit step. They make me nervous enough on a PC wired to a network - I really don't want to see a dropped connection during this step if I'm my mobile device. (So, I may build up a shopping cart with my phone, but I usually wait until I'm at a trusted PC before buying.)

    1. Re:Lingering effect of "only click this once" by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      So I built systems that use hosted checkout (which is what you are talking about), it's when the payment is not made on the same site but is executed on a page hosted by the payment system provider.

      I can tell you this: with FirstData PSP not closing the browser window is not actually a requirement for the payment to go through, if you do close the window or lose the connection the payment may still go through but the merchant will not necessarily know about this right away, so the way it is implemented is with the merchant checking all of the outstanding transactions as a batch separately from your session, this way if the payment eventually goes through the merchant will know and will complete your transaction. You will get the receipt in the email.

      Now, for this to work that way the merchant has to implement the batch request. Normally merchants don't build their software, they outsource or buy existing packages and this functionality is there by default. In any case you can always dispute the charge and in reality PSP is almost always on the side of the buyer, then there is a dispute resolution and by default the merchant stands to lose unless he can prove something.

    2. Re:Lingering effect of "only click this once" by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of this has to do with the lingering effects of a hundred "don't close your browse / click refresh / click twice" warnings during that critical credit card submit/commit step. They make me nervous enough on a PC wired to a network - I really don't want to see a dropped connection during this step if I'm my mobile device. (So, I may build up a shopping cart with my phone, but I usually wait until I'm at a trusted PC before buying.)

      As Apple/Android Pay on sites becomes a standard, this objection goes away.

    3. Re:Lingering effect of "only click this once" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> As Apple/Android Pay on sites becomes a standard

      It'll be many years before I hook a credit card up to my phone. Part of the reason I keep my family on the Google infrastructure is that their app store doesn't require a credit card (and I'm still looking for the first mobile app I'd need to buy), so it would take two leaps of faith to get me to link up built-in payment to my device.

    4. Re:Lingering effect of "only click this once" by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      For security, NFC with tokenization hardware in your device beats any scheme for securing credit card information on a website, which you have to do to buy anything online.

  12. Shopping without an account needs a cart by tepples · · Score: 1

    As I understand it, by "shopping cart" you're referring to the model in which the store assigns a randomly assigned identifier for a multiset of products that a user is considering buying, and then once the payment is approved for those items, they are moved to a new order. You are correct that this model became popular in the 1990s. But your use of "stuck" as well as "needlessly annoying and/or difficult" implies that there's something wrong with the "shopping cart" model. What has obsoleted it? The "1-Click" model pioneered by Amazon requires first creating a durable account identifier (name and password, backed by an address that can receive email and/or a phone number that can receive SMS) so that products added from the same account are combined into an order at the end of the business day. This works for merchants to which buyers expect to return, such as those you mention (Amazon, Apple and Starbucks). But a lot of people don't want to spend time creating an account with a merchant to which they do not foresee returning.

  13. Unfuckingbelievable. by geekmux · · Score: 2

    TFS and TFA both utterly fail to identify or even mention one of the largest issues with mobile devices today.

    Security.

    Forget flying to the red planet to bridge the gap for survival. I could print the number of times we've read the words "root access" regarding mobile device hacking in 2016 and have enough material to build an actual bridge to Mars.

    1. Re:Unfuckingbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TFS and TFA both utterly fail to identify or even mention one of the largest issues with mobile devices today.

      Security.

      This. I don't trust my smartphone at all. I won't do anything more critical than surf facebook on it.

    2. Re:Unfuckingbelievable. by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      TFS and TFA both utterly fail to identify or even mention one of the largest issues with mobile devices today.

      Security.

      Forget flying to the red planet to bridge the gap for survival. I could print the number of times we've read the words "root access" regarding mobile device hacking in 2016 and have enough material to build an actual bridge to Mars.

      Totally agree with you. I've read so much stuff over the years about phone hacks that I am super paranoid about doing anything over my phone that involves me accessing a site I actually do care about having a secure connection to, such as my bank, credit card providers, etc. I control my main PC at home and keep the anti-virus updated and don't go to websites that I shouldn't be visiting if I care about security. I have a lot of confidence that I can connect safely and securely from that PC to wherever I need to go. I don't have that kind of confidence on my phone. Plus I'm not 12 years old so I actually do prefer the bigger screen on a PC and the easier ability to open multiple windows there for comparison if needed.

    3. Re:Unfuckingbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You payment details are far more likely to be scraped in real time or downloaded in bulk due to compromised server security.

      Even if security problems were more prevalent on mobile devices, which I doubt, that should be the least of your worries.

      (Posted tediously from my iPhone)

  14. There are no tablet operating systems by tepples · · Score: 1

    Does the tablet on which you "brought quite a bit" run a desktop operating environment, such as Windows? Or does it run a smartphone operating environment, such as iOS or Android? Perhaps purchases on a Surface Pro or Surface 3 get assigned to "desktop" while purchases on an iPad or Galaxy Tab get dumped in "mobile".

    1. Re:There are no tablet operating systems by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Not the GP, but I use my Android Ellipsis tablet for any financial transactions. I do have a PC-BSD laptop that I use if the tablet doesn't have the apps, which I use to go to the website. While I have a Windows laptop as well, I've stopped using it for doing anything financial ever since Windows 10 and their forced updates, where I have no idea which of my info gets out in telemetry.

  15. Ship to "the house with this device in it" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why can't the site read your device's GPS and present a list of nearby shipping destinations?

  16. No sales to phone users by ThatNakedGuy · · Score: 0

    I run a photography business and website. I was advised by "experts" that my site had to be mobile friendly because many of my sales would come from mobile users. So, my website is mobile friendly and very easy to order from on a phone. How many sales have I gotten via phones? NONE, in 2 years. I no longer waste my money even advertising to mobile devices, and target desktop users only.

  17. There's an app for that. by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 1

    If you're still in the dark ages of mobile internet and try to do everything through a web browser, you're toast.

    I don't do a lot of shopping at all, but the few times I had to buy something from a smartphone, it was a pretty straightforward process as long as I did it through the app. Some apps allow me to scan the barcode of a product to buy more of it. Others let me buy online then use GPS location to find the nearest store to pick it up if I'm on the go. Try that on a desktop.

    1. Re:There's an app for that. by tepples · · Score: 1

      How is a locally owned small business supposed to find the money to hire developers to make three different native apps, one for each mobile platform (Android, iOS, and Windows Mobile)? Don't say PhoneGap because that's conceptually the same as "try[ing] to do everything through a web browser".

    2. Re: There's an app for that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xamarin

    3. Re: There's an app for that. by tepples · · Score: 1

      A small business might not be able to quickly afford the setup cost for Xamarin:

      • iPhone, Android, and Windows Mobile devices on which to test
      • A Mac on which to run Xcode with which to send the app to an iPhone for testing
      • A copy of Windows in which to run Visual Studio with which to send the app to a Windows Mobile device for testing
      • A copy of Parallels in which to run Windows
      • Recruiter's fee to find someone experienced in Xamarin
      • Wages for the Xamarin developer, so as not to divert effort from maintaining the company's web presence
  18. Have No Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have no problem buying books on my phone. When I go to Half-Price Books if I see a book that is interesting I just get out my phone and navigate to abe.com, which is a database of many small independent booksellers.

    Last week, I did this to buy a book that H-P had on the shelf for $8.95. A bookstore on Abe had the book for a little under $4, shipping included. Abour a month ago I did the same thing with a book they had on the shelf for $20. An Abe store sold it to me for $3.50, shipping included. I can make the purchase right in the store because abe.com has a pretty good mobile site for small screens.

      They even have free wi-fi at hpb to make this easier, though I mostly just use my cellular connection.

    1. Re:Have No Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a book store -not a showroom. Get out!

  19. Doing Stuff On Your Phone Still Sucks by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My laptop broke unexpectedly one day and for several days I was forced to use my phone to browse the web, and use email, while I waited for a replacement.

    It's only until you actually have to use your phone to do serious things, rather than just dicking around, that you realise just how awful the experience is and how much you'd rather use a proper computer.

    1. Re:Doing Stuff On Your Phone Still Sucks by OhFelgercarb! · · Score: 1

      Except for making phone calls. But yes, I hardly use my iPhone for anything else because it does suck. My next mobile phone will be a flip-phone. If I need anything else, I'll use my tablet or even better yet my PC.

    2. Re:Doing Stuff On Your Phone Still Sucks by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      My phone is fine for reading ebooks (when I'm away from my tablet), watching Netflix/Hulu (when I'm away from my tablet), and browsing some websites (when I'm away from my tablet).

      As for e-commerce, I don't even do that on my tablet. NFW will I mess with that on my phone.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  20. Amazon's iphone app by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    I do the bulk of amazon shopping on my 5S, with a screen some allege it way too small in this era of surfboard-sized phones.

    I find the app quite useful, I don't have to pinch zoom, I can read the reviews and product info just fine.. even with eyes that can't see clearly without glasses except at precisely 3.5 inches away. I can read this app with my progressives no problem.

    Maybe everyone else's mobile app sucks?

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  21. It's not about the cart by sjbe · · Score: 1

    But your use of "stuck" as well as "needlessly annoying and/or difficult" implies that there's something wrong with the "shopping cart" model. What has obsoleted it?

    There is nothing wrong with the shopping cart concept per-se. The problem is that most of them are terribly clumsy even on a desktop computer. On a mobile device they are nigh unusable. Especially if it is with a company you do not regularly do business with. I should almost NEVER have to enter my home address, shipping address, or payment info to make a purchase on my phone or tablet. Guest purchases should be almost as easy as purchases with companies you regularly do business with. Shockingly few companies really grasp this concept.

    But a lot of people don't want to spend time creating an account with a merchant to which they do not foresee returning.

    Agreed. So companies should partner with a transaction processor so that they do not have make a new account for a one time purchase. If I have an iPhone I've already got a business relationship with Apple so I'd be fine with merchant's offering ApplePay. Or Amazon's equivalent. Or Google's. Or... you get the point. Pick your favorite among the various top 10 or so options. Visa, MC, Amex, Discover, etc should be making this as easy as possible. I have ZERO interest in creating a new account for every bloody merchant out there. Make the transaction easy and give me a reason to want to come back to your store if you want recurring business from me.

  22. Transactions are too complex by avandesande · · Score: 1

    People buying on the web want to look at pictures, read reviews, do research, price compare, as well as read shipping and transaction fine print etc. You can't (or at least don't want to) do this on a phone.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  23. How many transaction processors does a site need? by tepples · · Score: 1

    So companies should partner with a transaction processor so that they do not have make a new account for a one time purchase. [...] Pick your favorite among the various top 10 or so options.

    And have half your customers leave because "your favorite" happens not to coincidentally match theirs. A user tries to check out, and the site accepts PayPal and credit cards, but entering credit card payment credentials is too cumbersome, and the user has been a victim of a PayPal hold.

  24. nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern app appers know that ONLY 5 inch apps can app apps! Keyboards are for LUDDITES!

    Apps!

  25. Give customers options by sjbe · · Score: 1

    And have half your customers leave because "your favorite" happens not to coincidentally match theirs.

    Did you give it a moment's thought? Vendors don't just have to work with one transaction processor. If they used ApplePay, Android Pay, and Paypal they could easily cover most of the popular options. Visa, Amazon, etc wouldn't be hard either. Companies that can't be bothered to give their customers options to make buying easy will lose sales and rightly so.

    And I didn't even get in to what a cluster**** it is to actually search for products on many mobile devices. Lots of companies are seriously clueless about how to make a website work well on mobile.

    1. Re:Give customers options by tepples · · Score: 1

      How much does it cost to integrate all these transaction processors, in both programmer wages and cost of hardware on which to test? For example, does a merchant need an iPhone and a Mac to test integration of Apple Pay?

  26. Why would you trust a PC more? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    This. I don't trust my smartphone at all. I won't do anything more critical than surf facebook on it.

    It's adorable that you honestly believe your PC to be somehow more secure, particularly if it runs Windows.

    1. Re:Why would you trust a PC more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Windows gets security updates, whereas most Android phones do not.

      But at the end of the day it depends on the user. For many, a patched Windows will still be less secure in practice, because it's easier to install malware on it.

    2. Re:Why would you trust a PC more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use a locked down, fully patched and firewall/antivirus protected PC that is isolated on your network and only powered on twice a month solely for banking, purchasing, and other important online functions and never surf anywhere or do anything else on it, then yes, it's going to be 1000% more secure than a smartphone that is always on, rarely updated, and often used for a myriad of functions.

  27. Everything on a phone sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why it has to be this way, but the mobile web in general just sucks. There isn't a website that I can visit that doesn't pop up at least 1 or 2 interstitial ads that are difficult or impossible to close.

    Don't even get me started on clickbait slide shows, browser redirect hijacks (which for some reason still work on mobile browsers even though desktop browsers licked that problem a decade ago), and other senseless bullshit that makes the mobile web a terrible experience.

    An honorable mention to all the mobile web developers out there that think your average smart phone is a Cray supercomputer with infinite resources. Ford, I am looking right at you.

  28. Good for repeat purchases though by bazorg · · Score: 1

    Well, if you're already signed up for a service and you need a practical way to press the "order now" button, mobile apps do the job well. I book cinema tickets regularly and all I need to do is pick film, time and seat.
    Someone else has already pointed out that eBay also works well, so I guess it's a matter of having a solid account functionality, with payment method stored safely in advance of going shopping with your mobile.

    If I wanted to buy something expensive or that needed specifying, searching for multiple alternative suppliers and then pressing the Buy now button, then yes, a bigger screen and keyboard is a much better idea.

    1. Re:Good for repeat purchases though by Altus · · Score: 1

      This is a good point, I bet a lot of people buy movie tickets on their phones compared to desktop. I would bet it has a higher percentage of mobile app buyers than most things but they really do streamline it either by saving your billing info or letting you use alternate payment systems like applepay or google wallet.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  29. Most apps suck by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Maybe everyone else's mobile app sucks?

    For the most part this is correct. Amazon has a pretty useful mobile app. Apple does a pretty good job too. eBay and Starbucks seem to have a clue. Probably a few others but most mobile purchasing apps and website just suck sour frog ass. They're just terrible. Terrible at finding products, terrible at communicating information, inconvenient to pay for them, and badly designed in general. So guess which ones get the majority of my money when I am using my phone?

  30. Wrong question by sjbe · · Score: 1

    How much does it cost to integrate all these transaction processors, in both programmer wages and cost of hardware on which to test?

    Who cares? It's a problem the company building the shopping cart should have to solve basically once. And that company is rarely the merchant themselves. There might be some transaction fees involved but so what? There already are such fees every time you use a credit card and people clearly don't care about that. The alternative is tons of lost sales and customer irritation at a terrible shopping experience. The question isn't what it will cost, the question is why aren't they already spending the money to fix the problem?

    Companies that don't get the importance of providing a great mobile shopping experience are going to get eaten alive by companies that do understand this. If they aren't already investing heavily in solving the problem they're going to wish like hell they had in a the near future when Amazon and the rest who do get it bludgeon them to death.

    1. Re:Wrong question by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's a problem the company building the shopping cart should have to solve basically once. And that company is rarely the merchant themselves.

      Then perhaps my perspective is distorted from experience in the "rarely", having built shopping cart software for a local retailer several years ago when limits of 3dCart were hurting sales.

    2. Re: Wrong question by corychristison · · Score: 1

      The problem is signing up with all of these payment providers is a hassle to small businesses.

      I build websites for a living. Some even ecommerce. I'm my own sites I only accept payments via Credit Card (through Stripe), because it's mostly universal by supporting most of the credit card providers out there, and Stripes custom integration while still being PCI-DSS compliant is very straight forward.

      They've recently rolled out support for Apple Pay, but the documentation was confusing if you use a custom integration, so I simply haven't done that yet.

      Paypal can be useful, and it's on my list of things to do. I use it myself sometimes, so I should make it available to those who prefer it.

      Other than that, I'm not going to seek out a dozen other services that take time and money to set up and integrate because it's too hard to type in credit card details.

  31. Breaking News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doing most things on your phone sucks.

  32. My kids by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    the girl 19 uses her phone but all she does is watch movies and videos and reads stuff. The boy 17 same thing, watches videos when he leaves his desktop. Except for quick lookups for stuff all purchases happen on the desktop and mostly for games or computer hardware.

    Myself I can't phantom wtf I would need that I would need that instant and must browse some shitty scale down website and order that product.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  33. Buying stuff? by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    If you thought buying stuff was hard on a cell phone, try doing your homework on your cell phone. You laugh. But I seriously see an increasing number of college students today trying to finish their online homework assignments using their cell phones. Interestingly, usually these are the ones that score rather poorly on assignments. I cannot imagine how someone can possibly think that doing homework on their cell phone is a good idea.

  34. As Henry Ford (or was it Robert Heinlein) said by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Doing anything on a a phone sucks.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  35. Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I buy things very frequently from Amazon using the Amazon app on my cell phone.

  36. I don't want them to have my phone number by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

    It is bad enough when I buy something from my desktop/laptop and I start getting tons of emails (to my throwaway email account of course) from every merchant under the sun trying to get me to buy similar products. The last thing I want is for the phone app to give the merchant my phone number so that he can sell it to every call center out there. Order something on your phone...start getting cold calls from shady sellers at all hours of the day and night.

  37. That's because web designers by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    were using the "Google Armageddon" to scare website owners into having their current sites turn into responsive by of course redesigning them. It was a cash cow for me funnelled by FUD.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  38. I bought my house on my phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I bought my house on my phone.... while I was out playing golf.

  39. Mobile apps... by matbury · · Score: 1

    ...for people who find web browsers too convenient and secure.

  40. Adobe has no room to talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adobe Business Catalyst has a horrible UI on the phone. Fortunately Shopify is much better.

  41. Re:ThePCisDEAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 Insightful

  42. Sadly, Windows is much more secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The complete mess that has been caused by Google allowing the carriers to get away with not pushing timely patches to phones has made most security conscious people avoid using them for anything involving money (or otherwise sensitive info.)

  43. big but simple purchases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am using mobile platforms to purchase only 2 groups of items:
    - ebooks
    - ebay or egun.de auctions
    For other purchases I prefer 20 tabs opened on 24" screen comparing options between sites before purchase.
    with auctions mobile is required for last moment bids :-). I o not have my own sniper scripts set up yet.

    500-2000 EUR i would count as quite large purchases (there is many more smaller 5-50 EUR)
    It depends on what i am buying , accessories or reloading equipment or ... OMG! guns.

    Guess what? With right price it does not matter that austere egun.de interface (very Y2K ) is designed for desktops only :-)

  44. Molten irony gushes forth by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Here we are, complaining about crappy mobile sites - on Slashdot.

  45. Same rule applies for any type of "work" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have yet to be able to do any real "work" on a phone (or tablet). Typing is an issue, of course, not to mention the screen real estate. These devices are passable for the occasional email or touchy-game but the "real work" apps won't arrive until the device UI improves.

  46. 19 inch phones are the obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an older person and I consider the 7" phone I have to be too small, a 19" large print edition would help people like me and fix OP's issues too

  47. Stop loading 10+MB of web trackers, ads, etc... by squallbsr · · Score: 1

    I've made a couple purchases using my iPhone. Fully native apps using Apple Pay are super simple to purchase items (check out Starbucks). However the mobile web (and 'hybrid' apps) tend to load way too many JS trackers and advertising frameworks. It slows things down, causes the interface to jump around, and makes navigation horrible. Stop bolting on all these 'tools' and write some good, clean, well designed code.

    --
    Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
  48. What also sucks by purplie · · Score: 1

    Update, linking to CNet still sucks.

  49. Prefer a comp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used a phone but it is slow. But even when I use a comp I boot using a USB drive with a Live Linux installed.

  50. It's not the websites; it's the devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typing on tiny screens is very difficult.

  51. Wrong doctrine by joboss · · Score: 1

    The thing is, zoom works really well compared to scrolling down for navigation and having to change loads of pages, etc. Mobile interface design is better if it's made to work with zooming rather than having a page with jumbo elements and barely anything on the screen. The information density of modern mobile UI design is aweful. You can either design it to zoom well and more more sense when zoomed our normally using the normal browser element, or you can zoom components yourself (click to expand, etc).