Slashdot Mirror


Boot Camp Might Damage Speakers on 2016 MacBook Pro (digitaltrends.com)

An anonymous reader writes:One of the things an Apple Mac can do that Windows 10 machines can't do -- at least easily and completely legally -- is run both Windows and MacOS. Interestingly, it's Apple's Boot Camp utility that makes this feat possible, which essentially enables Macs of all flavors to boot directly to Windows 10 and use the Mac as if it were a Windows machine. Usually, this is a fairly straightforward process that works well, with the resulting Boot Camp configuration doing fairly well at mimicking a Windows 10 machine with a few hardware limitations. As of the 2016 MacBook Pro machines, however, it appears that Boot Camp might be causing some serious and uncharacteristic audio issues. It appears that the new speakers running on the refreshed MacBook Pro line aren't working so well with the obsolete drivers provided in the current version of MacOS Sierra Boot Camp. Users are reporting the issue on all models of the 2016 MacBook Pro, and they are not experiencing the issue in MacOS. Virtual machines using Parallels or other software are also not experiencing the issue, providing more support of a bad audio driver causing the problem in Boot Camp.

116 comments

  1. pure quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really feeling that Apple quality right now.

    I'm sure steve jobs would be fine with this.

    1. Re:pure quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jobs would fire both Cook and Ive. TBH they should really spend money to poach real engineers because this is all downhill. Android is better than ios and chinese and korean phones are getting very good. Macos is fine but I would use ubuntu all day if they would allow ios dev on it.
      Fuck anyone who wants to run winshit on mac hardware. Let them burn!

    2. Re: pure quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple wasn't perfect when Steve jobs was around. I really people would stop with this crap. There were as many, if not more hardware and software issues as what existed today

  2. Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll take "Stuff that shouldn't even be possible" for $1000 Alex.

    1. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by degantyll · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, this comment made my day.

    2. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I'll take "Stuff that shouldn't even be possible" for $1000 Alex.

      I'll take "didn't even read TFS" for $1, Alex.

      Nothing to do with boot-loader, everything to do with a shoddy driver.

    3. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by mrbester · · Score: 1

      "But these go to 11"

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nothing to do with boot-loader, everything to do with a shoddy driver.

      Nothing to do with a boot-loader or a driver and everything to do with a hardware design which doesn't have a basic protection circuit.

    5. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by gravewax · · Score: 2

      The speakers are supposedly damaged over time according to the article. no driver or boot loader should be able to do that regardless of how shoddy, this is more shoddy hardware design then shoddy software.

    6. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by tomxor · · Score: 1

      "But these go to 11"

      They go to 65536 if you hack the soundcard firmware, this enables the hidden dancing speaker diaphragms dangling from speaker coils feature. it's the latest trend and it takes COURAGE! get with the programme.

    7. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing. A driver should NEVER be able to physically harm hardware. Yet another example of shit Apple "quality".

    8. Re: Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't put a "protection circuit" in, you specify speakers that can handle the max power output of the amplifier, and if you can't do that for some reason (space constraints maybe), then you design the max gain of the amp so it can't damage the speakers.

    9. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1
      http://www.dell.com/support/Article/us/en/04/557836/EN

      If audio/video playback is continuously done using VLC Media Player with volume higher than 100% over a period of time, even if the volume is kept at a lower level later, sound would be distorted. This distortion is permanent.

      If you are using VLC or any other amplification software, ensure that the:
      Update the device drivers from Dell Drivers & downloads website. Installing Microsoft Windows from Ubuntu will use only the native device drivers.

      Unpossible indeed, Alex.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    10. Re: Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You don't put a "protection circuit" in, you specify speakers that can handle the max power output of the amplifier

      Sure. But only if you really don't like your speakers and want them to break. Overloading an amplifier presents clipped signals to the speaker along with DC which is even more likely to burn them out than a standard overdriven signal.

      And yes you most definitely do put protection circuits in. Not only on outputs but also on inputs.

    11. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd love to know how this happened. At first I thought they might be being cheap, but then it occurred to me that maybe they are trying to get better sound out of the speakers.

      Laptop speakers are often quite tinny sounding, i.e. lacking in bass and mid-range. In the past Apple has done some heavy sound processing to get around this, much like Bose do. Speakers respond differently to different frequencies, and can be driven harder at lower frequencies without damage than at high frequencies. Thus you can make small speakers sound better by driving low frequencies harder into them.

      Traditionally this was done with a complex arrangement of analogue filters and boost circuits. Later it was done digitally by dedicated, fixed function chips that were extremely reliable. Maybe now Apple is trying to do it via the sound driver, like a WinModem kinda thing. That being the case, the standard non-Apple version of the drive is able to overdrive the speakers and doesn't do the careful power management required to stop them going pop.

      Just a theory but it fits.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      It happened instantly to Lon Seidman (Lon.tv) when he plugged an Xbox One controller into his 2016 MacBook Pro running in bootcamp. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      As soon as the controller was plugged in he heard a loud crackle/pop, magic smoke and what he believes were sparks. The only upside was the laptop didn't die, only the speakers.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    13. Re: Bootloader jeopordizes your audio hardware by Agripa · · Score: 1

      You don't put a "protection circuit" in, you specify speakers that can handle the max power output of the amplifier, and if you can't do that for some reason (space constraints maybe), then you design the max gain of the amp so it can't damage the speakers.

      It can be a difficult compromise. If the amplifier output cannot damage the speakers under any condition, then the speakers are larger than necessary. If the output level is limited by clipping, then this can increase harmonic distortion enough to damage the speakers anyway.

  3. Let me guess... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

    Speakers joining RAM, SSD, and batteries on Apple's growing list of components that can never be swapped out?

    1. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Between fake claims the USB-C problems, wireless problems, image corruption problems, GPU problems and now this it must be hard for even the most ardent Apple hater to be taken seriously.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Let me guess... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Speakers joining RAM, SSD, and batteries on Apple's growing list of components that can never be swapped out?

      No, not quite yet. Ironically, they haven't quite mustered the courage to remove the audio jack from the new MacBook Pro.

      Give Apple another year for them to give birth to the final iteration of iBorg hardware in a hermetically sealed box. Of course, this new hardware will drive the industry standard, so don't think for a second other vendors won't follow suit. There's way too much profit to be made with the Apple hardware model.

      And yes, we have the iLemmings to thank for nothing stopping the inevitable now. Gone are the days of consumer upgrades. Enjoy your sealed box, brought to you by iMorons who care more about fashion than function.

    3. Re:Let me guess... by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One thing you can say about Apple stuff - the iPhone 7 doesn't have headphone socket problems.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re: Let me guess... by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      You say that, but I've been trying to transfer this file from my mac for the last 45 minutes...

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    5. Re:Let me guess... by armanox · · Score: 1

      Haters? Apple hasn't made a "Pro" laptop in years, it would be nice if they would do so again. It used to be that a MacBook Pro was competitive with a Thinkpad or a Latitude/Precision. Now? I'll stick with my M4800 over any new MBP - it blows them out of the water. (For the record, I do have a 2012 non-retina MacBook Pro, and even after upgrading it (try doing that to a new one...) it still lags behind my older M4500.)

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    6. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about hooking more than one charger to a MBP blowing some type of circuit so no charging will ever will happen again? There is a YT vid on this where someone hooks up multiple chargers, and the MBP just stops charging for good, from any charger.

      Apple needs to fix stuff, not be "courageous" and make their devices ever more useless for day to day use. A Dell XPS 15 is more of a MacBook Pro than a MBP is now. Higher ppi screen to boot.

    7. Re:Let me guess... by irving47 · · Score: 0

      I don't like the trend one bit, either, but you act as if the "other side" was gleaming and pristine the whole time. Windows Vista? Windows 8? How many Mac users do you think were even remotely tempted to switch over, as the hardware started getting locked down more and more? "What, we've got to go to *THAT*? Even the most die-hard windows fans are ready to lynch Bill and Steve..." (Yeah, windows 7 was fine. There's a small shop in my town that still had a sign up that says, "We can install windows 7" a few months ago.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    8. Re:Let me guess... by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

      Apple fanboi loses his head in 10.. 9.. 8.. oh, no, there it was.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:Let me guess... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I don't like the trend one bit, either, but you act as if the "other side" was gleaming and pristine the whole time. Windows Vista? Windows 8? How many Mac users do you think were even remotely tempted to switch over, as the hardware started getting locked down more and more? "What, we've got to go to *THAT*? Even the most die-hard windows fans are ready to lynch Bill and Steve..." (Yeah, windows 7 was fine. There's a small shop in my town that still had a sign up that says, "We can install windows 7" a few months ago.

      Regardless of how fucked up Windows has become since 7, I believe we were specifically talking about proprietary bullshit in hardware design, not software.

      At least I can legally purchase and install Windows on pretty much any consumer or DIY Intel-based PC. The same can hardly be said for OSX.

    10. Re:Let me guess... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Vista was fine, it was just a bit early as the RAM requirements shot up by 8x overnight and the consumers weren't quite prepared for it, even the non technical ones.

    11. Re:Let me guess... by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      In fact I wish we could get Windows 8 with the Vista GUI. Windows 7 has about the same taskbar as 8 and 10, this is where they went a bit more application oriented and a bit less document oriented. Windows 8 has a better kernel (6.2 or 6.3 vs 6.0 and 6.1)
      Also, Vista had : quick toolbar, 95/NT4/2000 small start menu, classic theme with color schemes.

    12. Re:Let me guess... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      How about hooking more than one charger to a MBP blowing some type of circuit so no charging will ever will happen again? There is a YT vid on this where someone hooks up multiple chargers, and the MBP just stops charging for good, from any charger.

      Well, there's a Google+ post from a Google engineer damaging his Chromebook Pixel with a faulty USB-C cable, but no video that show what you describe. So par for the course at St. Apple Hater.

      https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT207256

      Notes on charging your MacBook Pro:

      Your MacBook Pro draws power from only one power supply, even if more than one is attached—so using multiple power supplies will not speed up charging.

      If you connect multiple power supplies to your MacBook Pro, the one that provides the most power will be used, regardless of the order in which you connected them.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    13. Re:Let me guess... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      Not just RAM. Vista video requirements led to a generation of laptops with Intel GMA 900 video that were obsolete before leaving the factory. Instead of relegating such hardware to the recycle bin, it was marketed as "Vista Capable". https://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-e-mails-reveal-intel-pressure-over-vista

  4. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One of the things an Apple Mac can do that Windows 10 machines can't do -- at least easily and completely legally -- is run both Windows and MacOS.

    1) So Apple Macs are Windows 10 machines.

    2) "Legally" is not really a very interesting distinction.

    3) Except that clearly it can't run Windows nearly as well as every other PC compatible.

    1. Re:no by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      3) Except that clearly it can't run Windows nearly as well as every other PC compatible.

      There was a story not that long ago (maybe a year back?) about a line of Dell or HP laptops that had the same sort of issue with the user being able to set the volume to levels that would cause damage to the speakers, despite them being designed to work with Windows from the get-go. So, contrary to your statement, yes, Apple managed to hit the bar set by their competitors.

      Mind you, most laptops, whether from Dell, HP, or Apple, don't have that issue in the first place, so it's a bit of an outlier, regardless of brand. We all agree that this sort of thing shouldn't be possible in the first place, but mistakes clearly do happen from time to time. We'll see if Apple makes it right for the customers affected.

    2. Re:no by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I mentioned this in the past - w/ PCs costing as little as they do - down to $250, why would anyone wanna share Windows and Mac OS on the same box, and risk things like say, a Windows 10 update screwing up Boot camp? Just get a separate toy for Windows. If you like the shiny stuff, get a Mac book pro on one side, and a Surface on the other. You'll be set

    3. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there are really damaged speakers, it should be covered by the warranty. as usual, apple will supply an updated driver over the next weeks, so it probably won't be a problem for long.

    4. Re:no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      also, why not buy different colored ones for each day of the week while your spending $ wastefully? idiot

    5. Re:no by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      How is someone spending money the way they want spending wastefully? It's their money. They can do with it what they want. I am sure you buy things that others would consider a waste.

      Also, speaking of idiots, the word is you're.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    6. Re:no by mlts · · Score: 1

      It is nice to have all data in one place. What Apple needs to look at is some virtualization technology, either by licensing VirtualBox, VMWare or Parallels, or rolling their own hypervisor. Ideally, a tier 1 hypervisor like Hyper-V would be the best, but a tier 2 would be better than nothing.

    7. Re:no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *ZING!!* good one

    8. Re:no by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Some people are forced to buy a MacBook. Not all iPhone developers are diehard Apple fans but if you are one you need an MBP anyway so it would sure be nice to run Windows 10 on it when you need it.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Donald Trump buys your mother's flat she has been renting for 25 years and kick her down the streets, afterall who are you to judge how other people spend money as they see fit?
      Now excuse me, I have to arrange for the $500k to get a 16-year-old's liver transplanted to me.

    10. Re:no by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Some people are forced to buy a MacBook. Not all iPhone developers are diehard Apple fans but if you are one you need an MBP anyway so it would sure be nice to run Windows 10 on it when you need it.

      So a Mac Mini won't do because you are being a fluffer and a nutter again. And why would anybody need to run Windows as an iPhone developer anyway?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    11. Re:no by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      When you are compiling hundreds of times a day, compile speed really starts to matter. Just because people are an iPhone developer it doesn't mean you don't also develop Windows applications. Use your head, really.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    12. Re:no by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      When you are compiling hundreds of times a day, compile speed really starts to matter. Just because people are an iPhone developer it doesn't mean you don't also develop Windows applications. Use your head, really.

      You claimed people are "forced to buy a MacBook", you dumbfuck troll. At least try to make it seem you are using your head.

      As for being forced to use Windows 10 - just do it. The problem you are pretending exists has been fixed a week ago, and even if it weren't, you don't need build-in speakers in pristine condition on your notebook to compile iPhone apps, nor Windows or Android programs. But then, you pretend you have to compile your shit hundreds of times a day - which means you suck as a programmer anyway.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    13. Re:no by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well, if a person has a job that involves in part developing an iPhone app, you tell me how they accomplish that without a mac of some type. Most travel from home to work and work in both places so that pretty much requires a laptop. It benefits my company to allow me to work from wherever I am. You seem like a very unreasonable person though so I am going to stop here and not waste my time.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    14. Re:no by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Well, if a person has a job that involves in part developing an iPhone app, you tell me how they accomplish that without a mac of some type.

      You didn't say "mac [sic] of some type", fucktard. You specifically tried to pretend that one needed the MacBook Pro we are talking about (and failed by leaving the "Pro" part off) Don't try to weasel your way out of this.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    15. Re: no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spending money how one wants and wasteful spending are not mutually exclusive.

  5. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'It just works.'

    I don't hear that as much as I used to. Why is that?

    1. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because now it just works. In the past it was 'it really works'. In the future it will be 'it barely works'.

    2. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably because your speakers are blown.

    3. Re:Apple by meerling · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the applefans will soon forget about this problem with apple like they have all the others and again start promoting they myth of apples are perfect and never have any problems. Of course, those people have never worked in tech support that handles both apples and windows. Heck, I still hear that apples don't have viruses from some of them, when back in the 90s I had a list of over a thousand were in the wild on them, and this was before the big malware explosion.

    4. Re:Apple by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      'It just works.'

      I don't hear that as much as I used to. Why is that?

      A Mac just works because it runs OS X. Any computer running Windows doesn't, even if the hardware is a Mac.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  6. I'm taking Microsoft advice to Linux developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except I'm coming from Mac.

  7. The summary says nothing about actual damage. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    If the anonymous reader or the msmash had done more than copy-pasting the first three paragraphs of the article, adding a link -- if they'd even read what they copy-pasted -- they might have realized this. If they lived in this fairy-tale land where editors edited, they might have gone so far as to summarize the bit about "pops" which appear to damage the speakers over time.

    1. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Informative

      None the less there's a reference in TFA about damage, clicking through goes to threads about damage, the first post goes to a person who has confirmed to received damaged speakers.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/apple...

      Not to mention a quick google for any article related to the issue will find plenty of sources that say you can hear one pop and then the speakers sound forever distorted even when rebooting into MacOS.

    2. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      None the less there's a reference in TFA about damage, clicking through goes to threads about damage, the first post goes to a person who has confirmed to received damaged speakers.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/apple...

      Wow, a claim on Reddit - then it must be true.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    3. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Wow, a claim on Reddit - then it must be true

      It's quite consistent with every other IT issue that's been reported.
      A claim on Reddit, multiple stories in the media, a long thread on Apple forums, and some douche-bag on Slashdot denying everything.

    4. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Wow, a claim on Reddit - then it must be true

      It's quite consistent with every other IT issue that's been reported.

      It didn't say it must not be true. You claimed it must be true, pointing to a source that is reputed with spreading false information. If you can't tell the difference... wait, you are trolling, right?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    5. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It didn't say it must not be true.

      Then maybe you should learn how to format for emphasis. Emphasising certain words has the same effect in written and spoken text. You sounded like a douche-bag.

      You claimed it must be true, pointing to a source that is reputed with spreading false information.

      No. I claimed it was true. Then I pointed to a single source. I never said that was the only source, and I'm not your mind nanny. Google your own shit.

    6. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      It didn't say it must not be true.

      Then maybe you should learn how to format for emphasis. Emphasising certain words has the same effect in written and spoken text. You sounded like a douche-bag.

      Whoooosh. Or rather whoosh-bag. Yes, that's what you are: a whoosh-bag.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    7. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Whoooosh.

      Wow you really know how nothing works do you.

    8. Re:The summary says nothing about actual damage. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Whoooosh.

      Wow you really know how nothing works do you.

      I sure as hell don't know how your "brain" works. And I'm sure the doctors are puzzled too.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  8. Wait.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's bootcamp that allows Macs to run Windows and not the fact that Macs and PCs use virtually identical hardware? Who knew.

    1. Re:Wait.. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I never bothered with bootcamp. I just used the Apple partition manager to alter the partition and boot type.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re: Wait.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, early boot camp did add a BIOS emulation module to the mostly standard EFI environment before Windows had mainstream EFI support. Apart from that, right?

    3. Re: Wait.. by mlts · · Score: 1

      Before Boot Camp came out, there was a contest to get Windows XP running directly on the Mac hardware. Vista ran without issue since it groks UEFI, but it took the Boot Camp release before XP could do the same. Every subsequent Windows version can run directly on the Mac hardware, although there are driver issues and oddball stuff. For example, the Apple-specific CD-ROM init sequence before their optical drive wakes up or the driver to enable the F-keys.

    4. Re: Wait.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most funny thing is Apple had EFI pretty much the first of any other PC, EFI is Microsoft's specification, and it took many years for windows to be able to boot/install on a EFI machine.

  9. "Feat"? "Interestingly"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's neither a "feat" that an Intel notebook can run Windows, nor is it interesting. What's with all the Apple cocksucking, submitter?

  10. Deadly instructions... by BenJeremy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this the guilty command in the boot loader?

    POKE 59458,62

    1. Re: Deadly instructions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POKE 54296,15 at random

    2. Re:Deadly instructions... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Is this the guilty command in the boot loader?

      POKE 59458,62

      That's why you should have got an Apple ][.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  11. boldness. by verbatim · · Score: 0

    bold.

    You're not listening to it right.

    --
    Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
  12. Seriously? by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    So the way I understand this is that the potentially damaging issues happens within BootCamp itself which Apple makes and provides the audio driver and this is before you boot into Windows and therefore Linux also? I am going to sum up the paragraph I could otherwise write: how do you fuck that up?

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  13. Holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you just spend half a summary defining "boot loader" on slashdot? Editor please.

    1. Re: Holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What editor?

  14. Drivers? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    When did Slashdot start accepting submissions from people who don't know the difference between a bootloader and a driver?

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    1. Re:Drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BootCamp is a utility that can do 2 things: 1. Partition the disk and prepare it to install Windows 2. Create a support disk containing drivers for running the Mac hardware under Windows. The bootloader is built into the EFI provided by the Mac hardware.

  15. Not the first problem with bootcamp by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

    Obviously Apple has put a limited effort into bootcamp. I'm running Windows 7 (natively booted) on late 2013 model. Gripes:

    - I've remapped some keys using Windows built-in functionality, and the reaction time on these remapped keys is slower. It misses normal duration keystrokes, so I have to be extra slow for these keypresses to register.
    - After waking up from sleep it clings onto the last active wifi network for tens of seconds, sometimes minutes, before realising the machine has just woken up in a different location and it's time to connect to another wifi. (Manually disconnecting from network helps but why the hell won't it do this pronto authomatically like my last Asus?)
    - After connecting to different wifi networks a few times, it stops recognising any and requires a reboot.
    - After disabling the wifi device (e.g., in an airplane), 30% chance it won't reenable and will require a reboot.
    - I could never get Windows to recognise the built-in SD reader.
    - It does not remember the keyboard backlight setting on reboot. Resets it to default.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    1. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Its long been known that Bootcamp is a least effort delivery, being that the power management is abysmal and the heat management is abysmal (fans on a lot more aggressive strategies than on OSX).

    2. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by kuzb · · Score: 1

      It's because mac hardware sucks and they still haven't figured out how to properly engineer ventilation.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    3. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Its much better managed in OSX though...

    4. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by DrTime · · Score: 1

      I've been using Macs since the MacPlus. Lately, everything Mac related from Apple is "least effort delivery".

    5. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by kuzb · · Score: 1

      If by "managed" you mean any time a mac has to do anything that looks like work it throttles to 3/4 or less of its normal clock speed then sure.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    6. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

      Totally disagree. Ventilation and fans are absolutely the best engineered aspect of MacBook Pro Windows notebooks! It is one of the main reasons to buy this hardware. It runs inaudibly with most normal light uses (browsing, document editing, watching full-screen movies). The fans only start being audible when there's something heavy to do.

      Bettery life under Windows in 4 h (light use), 3.5 h (medium-load work like Photoshop editing). That's not as long as MacOS but plenty good enough for me. Heavy gaming can speed up the fans to maximum and run the battery down in 1.5 h, but that's not normal work.

      I must note however that the fans are apparently managed by the OS. When I tried to run compressed disk image backup in some linux distro (pigz using all 8 cores), the machine simply overheated and powered down. That never happens in Windows, though.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    7. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

      P.S. Dust accumulation leads to poor cooling, in all notebook designs. Try to carefully blow some compressed air in the ventilation slits, or remove the back cover and blow everything over. You'd be surprised how much dust and lint flies out. This practically has to be done every year in most notebooks, to keep them performing properly. Be careful not to apply too much air pressure and not break the fan blades. MacBook Pro fans are quite strong, but I have seen fans in other cheaper notebooks broken apart by blowing on them.

      --
      17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    8. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, Macbooks throttle hard on MacOS.

    9. Re:Not the first problem with bootcamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > being this deluded

      https://i.imgur.com/khcbD0h.png

  16. Low bar by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    So, contrary to your statement, yes, Apple managed to hit the bar set by their competitors.

    At the prices Apple charge for their laptops I expect them to far exceed the bar set by their far cheaper competitors. If they only meet it then there is nothing to justify the far higher prices...which is a big part of the problem with the new MBPs: they are average laptops with an insanely high price.

    1. Re:Low bar by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      So, contrary to your statement, yes, Apple managed to hit the bar set by their competitors.

      At the prices Apple charge for their laptops I expect them to far exceed the bar set by their far cheaper competitors. If they only meet it then there is nothing to justify the far higher prices...which is a big part of the problem with the new MBPs: they are average laptops with an insanely high price.

      This is an early-Production issue, and will be quickly fixed with a software update.

      Remember, the new MBPs boast much louder (and better-sounding) speakers. I would bet that they have upped the amplifier-power as well, and testing this particular thing slipped through the cracks.

      An understandable growing-pain, considering it is a fairly obscure thing to test.

    2. Re:Low bar by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      At the prices Apple charge for their laptops I expect them to far exceed the bar set by their far cheaper competitors.

      As do I, but that's a different topic than the one I was addressing. I was merely pointing out that the OP was incorrect in his belief that Apple was failing to live up to the standard set by its competitors given that the competition has dealt with this exact same issue in the past (albeit, infrequently, as I pointed out, and just as I expect that this issue will be for Apple).

      If you want to argue about the value proposition, that's a dead horse that's been beaten to death. While I agree that this model is overpriced, I think that you're overstating things. Even so, we have better things to do than argue opinions on the Internet, so I won't try to convince you that it's not quite as overpriced as you seem to think.

      The one thing I do find fascinating and want to point out about this new model, however, is how different its reception seems to be among the general population than it is here in the nerd echo chamber. While folks like us may quibble over the degree to which the new MacBook Pro is overpriced, in its first five days it outsold the lifetime, combined numbers for every notable, competing laptop in the industry.

      We can dismiss that as the faithful followers buying another Apple logo for their Apple shrine. We can dismiss it as locked-in customers starved for an update who jumped eagerly at the chance to upgrade. We can dismiss it as simple brand loyalty. We can even dismiss the study as being biased, fabricated, or inaccurate. But even if the numbers aren't quite that high, it's clear that these machines are worth the asking price to many people, and that's something I've already been struggling to reconcile with my personal opinions. I'd encourage you to do the same. It's clear we're in the minority.

    3. Re:Low bar by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      So, contrary to your statement, yes, Apple managed to hit the bar set by their competitors.

      At the prices Apple charge for their laptops I expect them to far exceed the bar set by their far cheaper competitors. If they only meet it then there is nothing to justify the far higher prices...which is a big part of the problem with the new MBPs: they are average laptops with an insanely high price.

      This is an early-Production issue, and will be quickly fixed with a software update.

      Remember, the new MBPs boast much louder (and better-sounding) speakers. I would bet that they have upped the amplifier-power as well, and testing this particular thing slipped through the cracks.

      An understandable growing-pain, considering it is a fairly obscure thing to test.

      I don't even want speakers in a laptop. I never use them. Put batteries in the space otherwise taken by the speakers please.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:Low bar by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, though I'd rather the industry do so with TVs first. Laptops move between locations, not all of which are similarly equipped, so there are times when those speakers get use, but a TV is stationary. Why do they insist on including tinny speakers covered by ugly grills on sets that cost thousands of dollars, when it's pretty much a given that anyone buying the set already has an AVR and speakers, or at the VERY least a soundbar?

    5. Re: Low bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't "test" for this type of thing. A competent engineer designs the hardware so this cant happen. Every single component has a power handling specification, and you only put in components that can handle the power required plus some safety margin to increase reliability.

    6. Re:Low bar by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason I wished TV had stayed on 4:3, there would be room for speakers on the sides, built-in or not.

    7. Re:Low bar by GNious · · Score: 1

      You can get "TV"s without speakers, but they don't call them TVs, and they charge a few times more for them.

    8. Re:Low bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we're still in the majority - it's just that people aren't all that excited by new laptops in general anymore, but Apple has the RDF still that means people are still excited by anything Apple.

    9. Re:Low bar by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      So, contrary to your statement, yes, Apple managed to hit the bar set by their competitors.

      At the prices Apple charge for their laptops I expect them to far exceed the bar set by their far cheaper competitors.

      He said Dell and HP. So not really cheaper. Oh, and of course Dell claims that it happens because you used something like VLC, which voids you warranty (at least for the speakers). So the repair is certainly more costly to you.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    10. Re:Low bar by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      So, contrary to your statement, yes, Apple managed to hit the bar set by their competitors.

      At the prices Apple charge for their laptops I expect them to far exceed the bar set by their far cheaper competitors. If they only meet it then there is nothing to justify the far higher prices...which is a big part of the problem with the new MBPs: they are average laptops with an insanely high price.

      This is an early-Production issue, and will be quickly fixed with a software update.

      Remember, the new MBPs boast much louder (and better-sounding) speakers. I would bet that they have upped the amplifier-power as well, and testing this particular thing slipped through the cracks.

      An understandable growing-pain, considering it is a fairly obscure thing to test.

      I don't even want speakers in a laptop. I never use them. Put batteries in the space otherwise taken by the speakers please.

      I'm sure that Apple should act on the .0005% of the laptop-buying public that agrees with you.

    11. Re:Low bar by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      So, contrary to your statement, yes, Apple managed to hit the bar set by their competitors.

      At the prices Apple charge for their laptops I expect them to far exceed the bar set by their far cheaper competitors. If they only meet it then there is nothing to justify the far higher prices...which is a big part of the problem with the new MBPs: they are average laptops with an insanely high price.

      This is an early-Production issue, and will be quickly fixed with a software update.

      Remember, the new MBPs boast much louder (and better-sounding) speakers. I would bet that they have upped the amplifier-power as well, and testing this particular thing slipped through the cracks.

      An understandable growing-pain, considering it is a fairly obscure thing to test.

      I don't even want speakers in a laptop. I never use them. Put batteries in the space otherwise taken by the speakers please.

      I'm sure that Apple should act on the .0005% of the laptop-buying public that agrees with you.

      Well it worked for headphone sockets on the iPhone.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:Low bar by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, though I'd rather the industry do so with TVs first. Laptops move between locations, not all of which are similarly equipped, so there are times when those speakers get use, but a TV is stationary. Why do they insist on including tinny speakers covered by ugly grills on sets that cost thousands of dollars, when it's pretty much a given that anyone buying the set already has an AVR and speakers, or at the VERY least a soundbar?

      It's a holdover from a time when at least some TVs actually had almost decent speakers. I agree that the speakers that are being built-into TVs these days are ALMOST worse-than-nothing. But rather than excluding them entirely, I'd rather see just a LEEETLE bit of engineering-effort be put into them to make them sound at least as good as your average portable TV in the 1960s. They could go a LONG way simply by molding an "enclosure" around the speaker, turning it into an ersatz "acoustic suspension" system. This would MASSIVELY improve the low-frequency response of the tiny drivers without having to do anything else. Would it be a perfect example of an acoustic-suspension system? Of course not; but it would be a HUUUUUUGE improvement over the excuse that is shipping now in most flatscreen TVs.

  17. One way by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    how do you fuck that up?

    Well I suppose one way would be to spend all your engineering time shaving 2mm off the thickness, designing keys which hardly move, removing other keys and replacing then with a piece of the screen and finally attempting to remove all the ports. After that you probably don't have much time to spend on less important stuff like making sure you can't overdrive your speakers.

  18. speaker protection algorithm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To get more power from compact speakers, I believe Apple has an algorithm that detects and removes clipping before it can saturate/damage the speaker. Perhaps this isn't available in the windows side. This might be a consequence of hardware-sw algorithm co-design.

  19. Don't worry by kuzb · · Score: 1

    They'll blame the user for it and make you pay for it.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Don't worry by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      They'll blame the user for it and make you pay for it.

      You are confusing Apple with Dell.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  20. Glad I got off the apple cart by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Give it a couple of years of Apple pretending the issue doesn't exist, a class action lawsuit, eventually they'll be forced to acknowledge it and refund repair costs. But none of it is without a fight and without paying for the repair in the short term.

    Seen it over and over and over again now. Thanks but no thanks.

    1. Re:Glad I got off the apple cart by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The same thing will probably happen with touch strip. Suddenly the laptop known for it's resale value drops to 0 after 3.5 years.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Glad I got off the apple cart by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Give it a couple of years of Apple pretending the issue doesn't exist, a class action lawsuit, eventually they'll be forced to acknowledge it and refund repair costs. But none of it is without a fight and without paying for the repair in the short term.

      Seen it over and over and over again now. Thanks but no thanks.

      Or, A) Apple acknowledges the problem, B) fixes this under warranty (or rather hands you a new machine), and C) already updated the driver a week ago. Which coincidently is what's actually happening. Or rather was happening when this was still a current issue.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  21. Dual boot is so 2000 by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 1

    With virtual machines, why not run Windows in a VM. The last time I dual-booted was way back with Windows 2000 and 98 or some shit.

    1. Re:Dual boot is so 2000 by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I was just going to make this comment as well. Virtualbox even seems to work fine.. swish, there's OS X, swish, there's Windows 10. I'm pretty sure there wouldn't be much difference if run natively. Low latency SSD makes a big difference to a VM too. One could argue that it would be nice to have more than 8Gb RAM for that though.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Dual boot is so 2000 by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Games, or more accurately processes which are graphically demanding. I have a bootcamp'd iMac purely set up for games. I also run several different VMs for different actual work purposes, via VMware Fusion with macOS acting as host. The performance difference is still enough that it makes graphically intensive things worthwhile.

  22. Clever click-bait advertising: by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    Clever click-bait advertising:

    One of the things an Apple Mac can do that Windows 10 machines can't do -- at least easily and completely legally -- is run both Windows and MacOS. Interestingly, it's Apple's Boot Camp utility that makes this feat possible, which essentially enables Macs of all flavors to boot directly to Windows 10 and use the Mac as if it were a Windows machine. Usually, this is a fairly straightforward process that works well, with the resulting Boot Camp configuration doing fairly well at mimicking a Windows 10 machine with a few hardware limitations. As of the 2016 MacBook Pro machines,

    And the Bait after the Advert

    it appears that Boot Camp might be causing some serious and uncharacteristic audio issues. It appears that the new speakers running on the refreshed MacBook Pro line aren't working so well with the obsolete drivers provided in the current version of MacOS Sierra Boot Camp. Users are reporting the issue on all models of the 2016 MacBook Pro, and they are not experiencing the issue in MacOS. Virtual machines using Parallels or other software are also not experiencing the issue, providing more support of a bad audio driver causing the problem in Boot Camp.

    I understand /. needs to 'keep the lights on' but can it be done without completely selling out?

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  23. THANK YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for not starting your paragraph off by saying "apple mac can do that a PC can't". Because a mac IS a ****ing PC. Thank you so much.

  24. Must Be The Drill Sergeants by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Must be those drill sergeants at Mac Boot Camp yelling up close and personal at the equipment. You'd get damaged also.

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  25. OSX ain't done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until Windows won't run.

    Sounds vaguely familiar.