Slashdot Mirror


Religious Experiences Have Similar Effect On Brain As Taking Drugs, Study Finds (cnn.com)

A new study published in the journal Social Neuroscience finds through functional MRI scans that religious and spiritual experiences can trigger reward systems like love and drugs. "These are areas of the brain that seem like they should be involved in religious and spiritual experience. But yet, religious neuroscience is such a young field -- and there are very few studies -- and ours was the first study that showed activation of the nucleus accumbens, an area of the brain that processes reward," said Dr. Jeffrey Anderson, a neuroradiologist at the University of Utah and lead author of the study. CNN reports: For the study, 19 devout young adult Mormons had their brains scanned in fMRI machines while they completed various tasks. The tasks included resting for six minutes, watching a six-minute church announcement about membership and financial reports, reading quotations from religious leaders for eight minutes, engaging in prayer for six minutes, reading scripture for eight minutes, and watching videos of religious speeches, renderings of biblical scenes and church member testimonials. During the tasks, participants were asked to indicate when they were experiencing spiritual feelings. As the researchers analyzed the fMRI scans taken of the participants, they took a close look at the degree of spiritual feelings each person reported and then which brain regions were simultaneously activated. The researchers found that certain brain regions consistently lit up when the participants reported spiritual feelings. The brain regions included the nucleus accumbens, which is associated with reward; frontal attentional, which is associated with focused attention; and ventromedial prefrontal cortical loci, associated with moral reasoning, Anderson said. Since the study results were seen only in Mormons, Anderson said, more research is needed to determine whether similar findings could be replicated in people of other faiths, such as Catholics or Muslims.

35 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. In other news... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...taking drugs has a similar effect on the brain as having a religious experience. Without the guilt.

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that with drugs you (usually) know you're just tripping (at least pre and post event), whereas religious people seem to think that what they experience/believe is actually real. Think "Oh my god I saw pink talking bunnies" vs "god told me to circumcise my son/daughter".

    2. Re:In other news... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      ...taking drugs has a similar effect on the brain as having a religious experience. Without the guilt.

      I note that everyone seems to be ignoring the non-clickbait part of the summary. Religious experiences affect the brain the way drugs and love do....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:In other news... by rfengr · · Score: 2

      Is it the Church of LDS, or church of LSD?

    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Buddhism Without Beliefs is where I started...

    5. Re: In other news... by coteriescavenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, Nice logic, but it's not supported by history. Billions have been killed for the sake of land and resources, much more than the mere millions killed by industrialized nations. Worldly conflicts dwarf religious ones in every era. You do correctly point out, though, that people oppress or kill others are usually radicalized to believe they are "doing good", such as their leader being a god. How much more important then that they already know their creator, and that he calls for love and peace? Any good cause is an excuse for a tyrant, but Christianity is a hard one.

    6. Re:In other news... by swb · · Score: 2

      Religion generally is largely opposed to drugs because they threaten the religious leadership's monopoly on spiritual experiences.

      The Christians mostly co-opted alcohol consumption into their religious practices because it was already culturally endemic in the areas where organized Christianity took root and their religious orders often turned production of alcoholic beverages into an economic asset. Of course later Protestant denominations often rejected alcohol, too, although it's muddier as to whether this was a function of rejection of alcohol in the culture generally or a means of differentiating themselves from Catholicism which had embraced alcohol consumption.

      Islamic religions managed to reject most all of it, although this may have been easier because the climate and geography may have made alcohol precursors (grapes, grains or abundant fruits) less available and thus less endemic to the culture. I wouldn't also put aside the notion of differentiating from Christian religions and Western cultures.

      Hallucinogenic drugs though have seemed tightly controlled or rejected by religious authorities. Even in non-Christian religions where they formed part of the culture, access has been controlled to an extent by shamans or medicine men who also exercised influence over the local religion. I'd also argue that opium would fall into this category as well since opium smoking produces a delirium which may also serve as a replacement for religious experience.

    7. Re:In other news... by Tranzistors · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cool story, bro. Any citations?

    8. Re: In other news... by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Your claim that "Christian religion is just as suitable as a pretext for violence and oppression than any other one." only reveals your ignorance of religions. Clearly you have no idea about e.g. Aztec religion.

      You shouldn't speak of ignorance. Do a little history reading, and I think you'll find that far more people have been murdered in the name of Christ than in the name of Huitzilopochtli.

      Also, followers of the Abrahamic religion - all three varieties - continue to kill today. I'm not so worried about the Aztecs, but followers of JHVH are direct threats to me and my descendants.

  2. Rick James was wrong by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Religion is a helluva drug." And far more destructive than heroin.

  3. Opiates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could say it's the opiate of the people.

  4. Small Sample Size by DERoss · · Score: 4, Informative

    Only 19 persons were tested. All were from the same religion. There was no control set of non-religious individuals tested to see if the MRI scans were indeed representative of "religious and spiritual experience".

    Most important, the Slashdot headline "Religious Experiences Have Similar Effect On Brain As Taking Drugs, Study Finds " differs from the title of the original study report. In the original report, the title is "Reward, salience, and attentional networks are activated by religious experience in devout Mormons", clearly limiting the scope of the study to one religion.

    1. Re:Small Sample Size by Aristos+Mazer · · Score: 2

      The summary of the article explicitly mentioned the limits of the study and the need to broaden it. See final sentence. Nothing underhanded here.

    2. Re:Small Sample Size by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Of course the study was limited to one religion. The sample size was small.
      Of course the sample size was small, putting 19 people through an MRI imaging an area over and over in different scenarios costs real money.
      Of course there was no ability to extend this due to a lack of funding.
      Of course there's a lack of funding because science is just garbage making conclusions from small sample sizes and insufficient control groups.

      I suppose you'd only be happy if we abandon all science completely.

  5. Re:This is your brain by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, the famous Karl Marx quote.

    Keep in mind that, in context, Marx was referring to opiates as something that relieves pain, rather than something that gets you high.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  6. Religion is the opium of the people by danlip · · Score: 2

    Sounds like Marx was right about that.

  7. Cheech and Chong... by GerryGilmore · · Score: 2

    ...had this nailed decades ago! "I used to be all messed up on drugs, man. Now, I'm all messed up on the Lord!"

  8. Forced to go to church as a kid by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Think 60s/70s. Went twice on Sunday, then Wed night. I was 10 or 11 when I started asking questions that got answered by "ya gotta have faith". Um, if I had faith I wouldn't be asking these questions.

    Older I got the more I hated church. Not gonna lie, there were a lot of days when I thought about opening the car door and jumping out of the car. On the freeway. To this day I don't dress up, nor do I sing in public.

    Then Wizard of Oz was shown on Wednesdays for a few years in a row. I'd heard a lot about it, never seen it, wanted to see it. But no, I had to go to church Wednesday nights, cuz reasons.

    Moved out when I was 18. Only time I've been in a church since was when mom died 4 years ago. Dad keeps asking me to go to church with him, I demurr, he doesn't understand why I won't go.

    During my 20's and half my 30's, whenever I found someone was religious I'd goad them. Actively tried to piss them off. I grew out of that.

    I think if you have a rational, questioning mind, church is either a social thing or pure BS.

  9. Opium by StormReaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So we have conclusive proof that religion really is the opiate of the masses.

  10. Re:A lot of folks won't like this by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    Another conclusion is that we shouldn't make all that much out of small functional MRI studies done by random researchers since they're hard to do correctly.

    Of course, we could also use a dead fish as a control.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  11. Re:This is your brain by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you need to cut down on your opiate dosage

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  12. Re:Or other things by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

    Or favorite sports teams, or social movements, or fandoms, or whatever else makes people tick.

    Yep, exact same regions of the brain in fact:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10...

    So next time somebody talks about how wonderful Steve Jobs was, you can tell them to lay off the drugs, and still mean it both figuratively and sincerely...and hell...probably literally too.

  13. LDS LSD mostly didn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I grew up in a Mormon (LDS) family, and don't remember too many significant feelings of the sort mentioned in the article. I eventually concluded the church was pulling my leg and dropped out.

    However, I once was visiting Utah on an informal tour of "important" LDS buildings, and had a strange feeling that brought me back to the days when I did believe. It was sort of euphoric relief that an omnipotent father figure "has our back" and that we, the LDS, are on the good team. It's roughly comparable to your town's sports team winning a big game where the crowd feels a togetherness and collective strength.

    I thought to myself, "Why am I having this feeling, I don't believe any of it." After pondering it for a while, I concluded that the tour triggered memories AND feelings of my younger days when I did believe.

    There's also negative experiences related to it, the reverse of the above, but they are kind of personal. Religion is a crazy mind-game either way. If you grew up with it, you can never get it out of your head: it shapes your thought process in that your mind-model of the world uses idioms from the religion. These idioms become a kind of meta language of the mind.

    For example, when I think of user usage log files, it triggers the concept that "God knows your every move, thought, and action". I don't actually believe that, but my mind uses that as the conceptual idiom for what log files do.

    Hierarchical file systems remind me of the church hierarchy. LDS-ers talk a lot about their organizational structure; sticking portraits of leaders on their walls. God is into org hierarchies I guess. I suspect it's actually an fringe ego benefit because most leaders have zero or small salaries from the church: it's largely volunteered "labor". The top leaders are usually wealthy by other means.

    The idea of other planets is natural to LDS-ers because of the concepts like planet Kolob (which is not official doctrine actually, long story). Thus, an enjoyment of space sci-fi came natural.

    I like to document rules, procedures, and assumptions; which may be traced back to scriptures, commandments, and rule lists like what LDS calls "Words of Wisdom", which the "coffee is bad" concept derives from. It also says oats are bad, but for some reason that's not enforced and barely mentioned. Go figure. (I almost typed "barley mentioned").

    1. Re:LDS LSD mostly didn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I grew up an odd mix of RC and evangelical. Very devout. I genuinely believed until my early 20s and then experienced a very abrupt 'loss of faith' that triggered a disintegration of sense of self, so deeply was that belief ingrained and so central was religion to my life.

      In attempting to define my self without reference to church or god, I recognised that I had a pattern of thought, a mind-model as you say, that was shaped to fit religion and it was going to take a while before that could change. In the meantime, I didn't want to have it fill with the next thing to come along, or to become a kind of mental abscess, scabbed over but not healed. So I packed it, so to speak with a self-created 'religion'.

      A polytheistic belief, to counter the monotheism of Christianity. Fictional characters (Pratchett's the Lady, Gaiman's Death and Eris from the Principia Discordia - although this last is more historic than fictional). Female vs male. Whenever I reflexively prayed, it was to one of those three. My ritualistic behaviour became not mentioning the Lady's name, hot dog buns and the like. I knew, on some level, that I was making this up, but it gave me something for my habits to work with while they wound down and were replaced with different patterns of thought. And for a while, part of me believed. That habit of belief didn't really care what the subject was, it just needed a focus.

      It took years, but the habits eventually were replaced by different (better?) ways of thinking and it's been a long time since I can remember reflexively winging off a quick prayer when anxious.

      Yeah. Religion. It's a hell of a drug.

  14. Re:So why are religions still legal? by gweihir · · Score: 2

    You have it backwards. The whole "war on drugs" is an attempt by religion to kill competition from a better product. Organized religion is behind this.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  15. Re: More important question by rfengr · · Score: 2

    That would be muslin.

  16. Re:You have to do better than this. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you look at the report, even at the start they state:

    doctrinal concepts may come to be intrinsically rewarding and motivate behavior in religious individuals.

    and at the end

    Ultimately, the pairing of classical reward responses with abstract religious ideation may indicate a brain mechanism for attachment to doctrinal concepts and charismatic in-group religious leaders.

    So, this is stated very carefully in scientific language, but what they are discussing is how religious ideation and the following of religious leaders can bypass rational centers of the brain and create a self-reward loop in which these acts become their own reward.

    It doesn't seem to me that it's being a bully to be concerned with why religion leads some people to kill and prompts others to acts of violence and oppression. The study is a start toward an answer. One could connect this study, for example, with the Stanford Prison Experiment, and research whether the same reward mechanisms were activated. Leader-following and an in-group were involved in the Stanford student's behavior. Do self-rewarding loops of religious ideation and leader-following reinforce such behavior?

  17. Re:You have to do better than this. by jensend · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ultimately, the pairing of classical reward responses when hearing music with learning a smattering of music theory may indicate a brain mechanism for greater music appreciation. So what?

    That's not "bypassing rational centers of the brain and creating a loop." It's simply "these people had a positive experience and there were ideas that were associated with that positive experience." If anything, the fact that brain regions which are active in moral reasoning were especially active in these people suggests the opposite of "bypassing rational centers."

    You've conveniently ignored the actual data and results of their study entirely and instead taken a couple of speculative comments ("here's an idea, please fund us") out of context and twisted them.

    The old baloney about religion being a primary cause of violence is a ridiculous urban legend. Ultimately you can trace the exaggerations back to centuries-old partisan tracts. Actual historians (e.g. Encyclopedia of Wars) find religiously motivated wars to be roughly 2% of the total death count.

    If what you get out of the Shoah is that Hitler was right on both counts - Judaism is a disease, as is Christianity - there's something fundamentally wrong, not just with your understanding of history but with you.

    The Inquisition killed about 3,000 people over the course of 350 years. (Secular courts, of course, killed people at a much faster rate.) For some perspective, the Great Leap Forward killed 30,000,000 people in 3 years.

  18. Re: More important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd call Islam a cult bent bent on world domination. Convert or die.

    That's exactly how Christianity became a dominant religion. Convert or die and if anybody thinks that I'm trying to defend Islam here, think again. I dislike all the Abrahamic religions equally since they are all missionary and violent.

  19. Not just religion and drugs by bluegutang · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't ALL subjectively enjoyable experiences have the same effect on the brain, releasing dopamine and serotonin, and activating particular pathways? Not only religion and drugs, but also sex and chocolate and cat videos and the election of your preferred candidate?

  20. Grass is green by m76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So they discovered that participating in what they have been brought up to rejoice and be in awe of actually causes them joy. I'd be more surprised if the result were the opposite.

    That's why people sign up and most never get rid of these delusions because it makes them feel good about themselves. They realize that santa and the easter bunny are not real, somehow they can't do the same thing with their deity and it's prophets.

  21. I can confirm that. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    In my teens I praticed meditation in general and, more specifically, what is called "astral projection", basically inducing out-of-body-experiences. I practiced it for six years just about every evening. In the end I finally made it, achieving that higher state of mind, where you experience the buzzing and humming, your body shrinking and your soul expanding and see "the tunnel" and such. It's the most intense state of being I've ever experienced and I doubt any drug can push you further. You're basically hyper-awake while it happens. And it's scary. Turns out we don't like to leave our body most of the time. :-)

    The difference in state of mind and awareness compared to normal as normal compares to vivid, semi-lucent dreaming. I stopped it after this event, but one effect is that I don't fear death as much as I used to.

    I cant say for sure that we are still around after death, like the mystics like to point out, but it sure felt like it.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I can confirm that. by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sigh.

      I never get why we have to overblow this.

      Do you know, I drove home last night and have no memory of doing so? Automatic pilot, driven by my brain, while I thought of "higher" things.

      I changed gear, negotiated roundabouts, kept to speed limits, stopped for pedestrians and red lights and navigated home without giving it a single conscious thought.

      I also know that every night I fall unconscious, hallucinate vividly and then have complete amnesia about the whole event if I'm not interrupted before my brain is finished with it. It's called dreaming.

      If I was sitting in a room for six years trying to do something, my brain would hallucinate the same (that's not meant to be an insulting word, it's quite literally what imagination and dreaming are) and believe I was outside my body. Yet, nobody, ever, in any controlled experiment, even when saying they ARE in that "special place" has ever demonstrated knowledge of, say, what's on top of the dresser behind them that they couldn't see from inside their body, or similar. You can even awake completely relaxed, unstressed, energised, without even having an hour's rest if you've had the right dream.

      In the same way as out-of-body near-death experiences and suchlike, attributing it to some other existence seems, to me, to be entirely insulting to the capacity of the human mind under normal circumstances.

      We have composers who see colours, artists who can paint pictures that don't complete until the final brush stroke but they can see it in their head in vivid detail, and story-writers who live in their heads most of their lives even if they can't write it down to save their life.

      When the brain is then deprived of sensory information, and forced to entertain itself, it's no wonder that such experiences happen. To push them to "something else" rather than "Woah, my brain is capable of stupendous feats" is, I feel, condescending.

      It doesn't require a supernatural explanation, or even comment. We've probably all done more amazing things in our sleep, or driving home from work.

      Hell, I dreamed a "movie" from start to finish in twenty minutes of being asleep one night and still, to this day, I like to fold back into that dream or even write it down (which has taken YEARS of my life to do so). My brain was on-form that night, and I awoke exhilarated and haven't forgotten that experienced in 20+ years.

      I really find it annoying when people then - as you just did - write it off as supernatural and, having "mastered" it in what sounds like a repeatable way, then ignore it and never do it again for fear of... what? Discovering some truth? Angering some god?

      What if that's the way to escape the Matrix? What if that's the way to gain insight from your own mind on things nobody else has ever managed? What if that is the way to Heaven/Hell or whatever?

      As someone of a scientific mind (can't you tell?), it drives me mad that people get near the equivalent of the next level of human existence, then never repeat it, wrap it in crap like "astral projection" and meditation, and basically forget it ever happened.

      If it made you not fear death, surely you could do it again and be less scared, and not fear dying in the process?

      But, maybe that would then conflict if - actually - it turns out just to have been a particularly vivid dream?

  22. Re:Or other things by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

    Ok, ok, among the things you technically enjoy are such compounds as ....

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  23. Re: More important question by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    I'd call Islam a cult bent bent on world domination. Convert or die.

    Yup, just like Christianity was, back when it could get away with lopping your head off on a whim.

    Christians would still love to be able to do that kind of thing, and they're jealous as hell that Islam is so upfront about it.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...