Slashdot Mirror


Trump Will Get Power To Send Unblockable Mass Text Messages To All Americans (nymag.com)

President-elect Donald Trump will have access to a system which can send unblockable texts to every phone in the United States once he becomes the president. From a report on NYMag: These 90-character messages, known as Wireless Emergency Alerts (or WEAs), are part of a program put in place after Congress passed the Warning, Alert, and Response Network (WARN) Act, in 2006. WEAs allow for targeted messages to be sent to every cell phone getting a signal from certain geographically relevant cell towers (or, in a national emergency, all of them). While it'd be a true nightmare to get screeching alerts from your phone that "Loser Senate Democrats still won't confirm great man Peter Thiel to Supreme Court. Sad!", there are some checks and balances on this. While President-elect Trump hasn't shown much impulse control when it comes to his favorite mass-messaging service, Twitter, the process for issuing a WEA isn't as simple as typing out a 90-character alert from a presidential smartphone and hitting "Send." All WEAs must be issued through FEMA's Integrated Public Alert Warning System, meaning that an emergency alert from the president still has at least one layer to pass through before being issued. While FEMA is under control of the executive branch (the head of FEMA is selected by the president, and reports to the Department of Homeland Security), the agency would have a vested interest in not seeing their alert system bent toward, uh, non-emergency ends.

33 of 555 comments (clear)

  1. Don't give him ideas by NotInHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    Journalists, be careful what you publish. Don't give donald ideas!

    1. Re:Don't give him ideas by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have been woken at 2am by idiotic Amber Alerts about incidents hundreds of miles from my home. If there was some way to block these messages, I would do so. I don't think Donald is going to be any worse than the bozos already abusing this system. The kidnapping of a blonde white girl by her non-custodial parent, is not a "national emergency".

    2. Re:Don't give him ideas by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have been woken at 2am by idiotic Amber Alerts about incidents hundreds of miles from my home. If there was some way to block these messages, I would do so.

      Blocking Amber Alerts on iOS is simple. Go to Settings -> Notifications, scroll down to the bottom of that page, unselect "AMBER Alerts" (and/or "Emergency Alerts"). I assume it's equally easy on Android.

      But back to the subject at hand... I held my nose and voted for Hillary, but I'm getting really tired of these "Trump may do this" and "Trump might do that" propaganda pieces that are spewing forth across the web. I'm nervous about his presidency; but the election is over - let's see what he actually does, and then react if necessary.

      I'm old enough to remember similar hysteria from back when Reagan was elected. Early on, his administration tried to do some pretty darn stupid things, like attempting to let ketchup count as a vegetable in school lunches. I remember Bill Clinton's early day missteps as well ("Sorry, we don't talk to the military"). But between the politics of Washington DC and the court of public opinion, the initial lunatic fringe crap gets self-corrected pretty darn quickly. The Republic will survive.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: Don't give him ideas by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some of us cannot turn off our phones at night. I had to deal with my Father dying of leukemia for 3 years or so, then an over-anxious Mother who was having panic attacks and then we found she was developing Alzheimer's. For 10 years, I had to be on call 24/7 because I never knew what would happen or if that out-of-town phone call was a friend or an EMT or someone calling on their cell phone to tell me she needed help or was in serious trouble.

      It must be a wonderful privilege to live in a world where it's easy to imagine not having to be on call 24/7.

    4. Re:Don't give him ideas by Nunya666 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have been woken at 2am by idiotic Amber Alerts about incidents hundreds of miles from my home. If there was some way to block these messages, I would do so.

      Blocking Amber Alerts on iOS is simple. Go to Settings -> Notifications, scroll down to the bottom of that page, unselect "AMBER Alerts" (and/or "Emergency Alerts"). I assume it's equally easy on Android.

      I don't get enough Amber alerts to be annoyed by them, but your post made me curious about turning them off on my Android (Galaxy S5). A quick search on DDG revealed that, on Samsung Galaxy phones, it's a setting in the Messaging app. Interestingly, there is also an option for Presidential Alerts that is checked/selected/enabled and it cannot be unchecked.

    5. Re:Don't give him ideas by SecurityGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, he's not the president yet, so he doesn't have the ability to do it.

      It's not news, but it's also not fake. It's basically an opinion piece, which is hardly new to /.

    6. Re: Don't give him ideas by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In many cases, wait until it was too late.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re:Don't give him ideas by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can always kill the phone's sound before bed, and check messages when you get up. You kids just don't understand that answering your phone, whether talk, text, email, amber alert, or presidential alert is NOT MANDATORY. If you're driving, leave the damned thing in your pocket, whoever is attempting contact can wait until you get where you're going.

      Stop being a slave to your phone!

      If it looks like there may be tornadoes that night, you might want to let the presidential/amber alerts annoy you.

      Previewing this, I laughed; this font makes "tornadoes" look like "tomadoes" (I've seen "tomatoes" misspelled like that before).

  2. What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the fuck is this? I don't like Trump because I have a brain cell, but this is bullshit garbage. msmash/manish needs to go.

    1. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the fuck is this? I don't like Trump because I have a brain cell, but this is bullshit garbage. msmash/manish needs to go.

      I don't like Trump either- mainly because he's an openly self-serving sociopath, a narcissist to almost certainly pathological degree, a shameless bully with no target too cheap or low if it dares to threaten his dangerously thin skin, and an all-round, outright piece of shit.

      And I agree with you- this story (or rather, the Trump slant on it) is clickbait garbage of the type that's going to dilute and cheapen any legitimate criticism of him because people switch off after getting overwhelmed by opportunistic Trump-slanting of crap like this at the slightest excuse.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  3. Lets not worry about this yet by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's plenty Trump is actually doing that will have drastic consequences over the next few decades to be concerned about. Lets not start worrying about a power he hasn't abused yet, has made no comments that show he will abuse it, and if abused would be more an annoyance than a crisis. Priorities people.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Lets not worry about this yet by Verdatum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's...extremely rational. What are you doing hanging around on modern Slashdot?

    2. Re:Lets not worry about this yet by caferace · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is a low ^^ id number. That is all.

    3. Re:Lets not worry about this yet by Talderas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How is it that whenever there is a discussion regarding low UIDs you guys seem to crop up. Is there like a mailing list that people report to that you're all subscribed to for notifications?

      Maybe I just don't pay attention to UID except when UID is mentioned.... nah, that's too plain and boring. I'm going with the conspiracy theory.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    4. Re:Lets not worry about this yet by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Funny

      How is it that whenever there is a discussion regarding low UIDs you guys seem to crop up. Is there like a mailing list that people report to that you're all subscribed to for notifications?

      "Mailing list"? "Subscribed"? Ha!

      No, I'm sure these guys predate all that new-fangled nonsense. The 4-digit UID guys have a 1980s-style robocall recorded message that goes out; the system that operates it runs on a beowulf cluster of Commodore 64s.

      The 3-digit UID guys have a network of carrier pigeons that send out "notifications."

  4. Ha ha ha by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Funny

    First FEMA tweet

    Rosie O'donnell is a yuge bitch!!!!

    1. Re:Ha ha ha by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've got "Trump sends nation goatse SMS" as the center square on my bingo card.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. Yes? So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    And Obama had this power too. Don't remember quite how far back this goes, but pretty sure Bush was able to do it too.
    And EVERY president going back to the start of the Emergency Broadcast System, since 1963, has had the ability to commandeer all airwaves as well. It was accidentally set off once, in 1971.

    Meh.

    Next story.

  6. Bigger worries then Unsolicited Junk Texts by Dorianny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trump will soon have the power and authority to launch a Preemptive Nuclear Strike and you are worried about the misuse of the WEA's Text Messages?!

  7. But I'm on the do not call tweet list... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Instead of reading a summary of Mr. Trump's 3AM tweets in The Wall Street Journal each morning, I'll be force to read each one as they come in real time.

  8. Why is this news? Obama has the power now... by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is this news? Obama has the power now. I trust Obama, as a professional Chicago-machine politician, even less than Trump.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Why is this news? Obama has the power now... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I assume you don't trust Trump to tell the truth - since it must be obvious even to you that he lies more or less constantly. So you trust him to be 'different', I suppose - with some kind of faith that 'different' in his case will turn out to be better. All very optimistic of you.

      But have you considered that, for example, there was nothing stopping Trump from developing (or adopting) a coherent plan for, say, 'repealing and replacing Obamacare' sometime in the past 6 years. To me, the fact that he hasn't done so, and campaigned (and won) on a promise of 'something better', implies that he didn't have something better to offer - or he'd have offered it. There's no need to play political chess in pursuit of a popular policy, so let's assume his eventual 'something better' won't be better for enough voters for him to have presented it to them...

      Yes, Obama is a politician - and a bit of a disappointment at that. 'Chicago-machine', I guess, carries a lot of specific negative meanings to you, but I'll assume it's is essentially code for 'Democrat' or 'urban' or something. But as far as 'trust' is concerned, Obama governed pretty much like he said he would - way to the right of where people (and the Nobel committee) 'hoped' he would, based, I guess, on their projections of what the first black President would do. But he was pretty trustworthy in the sense that he didn't misrepresent his policies much. Trump, on the other hand is claiming he's going to restore middle-class factory jobs by, what? Cutting taxes, mainly. Well, if you haven't figured out that 'tax cuts for the rich pay for themselves and help the middle class' is a lie by now, you're just not paying attention - or you've chosen sides and don't care about the truth.

      Well, we're all about to see your assumptions and your faith tested. And I predict a continued rise in income inequality, with some various uglinesses on the side. If that happens, what will your reaction be?

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    2. Re:Why is this news? Obama has the power now... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except that Obama is perhaps the least corrupt individual to hold the Presidency since Jimmy Carter. Sure, he's a politician, and somewhat beholden to his donors - but in the scope of things, he's run a pretty clean administration. So in that light, using "Chicago-machine" to impugn him as corrupt? Why? Because he happened to come from Chicago? That won't fly. So I'm sticking with "Democrat" or 'Urban" or (dare I say it) "Black".

      And I'm not one of those Democrats who's willing to chalk Trump's success up to racism. He certainly had the support of just about every racist you can find, but that doesn't make all of his swing supporters racists any more than Obama's coming from Chicago makes him corrupt. What it does make them is less uncomfortable associating themselves with racists and a politician (and party) who courted the racist vote than they are frightened and angry in general about the state their lives and the ability of the government to do anything that might make it better. I doubt they expect Trump to make it better either - they just want him to blow a few things up. Judging by his cabinet picks, they're likely to be disappointed even on that count. Maybe he'll keep them on board with a steady diet of tweeted conspiracy theories and personal insults...

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  9. Give it a break slashdot by jmichaelg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate pointless fear mongering articles. Best example of fake news there is right here on slashdot.

    Trump isn't likely to abuse the alert system but leave it to slashdot to make an issue of it.

      Trump won. Get over it already.

    1. Re:Give it a break slashdot by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fear mongering is a gift to the fake news industry. Because it's speculation based on fact, it's technically not false. But it's also usually about three decimal places past the zombie apocalypse in probability.

      As long as a segment of Democratic base continues to indulge in extreme paranoia, the news industry across all strata will continue pumping out stories to indulge this paranoia.

      I predict next we'll hear that Mike Pence will be personally performing abortions on pregnant transgender people because the bible says it's ok.

  10. How is this news, or even interesting? by MullerMn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What the fuck is this? Seriously? What. The. Fuck. Taco must be turning in his grave/money pit at what the various owners of Slashdot have done to it since he sold it on.

  11. How about... by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As the old adage goes: "Let's cross that bridge when we come to it"

    Can we stop complaining about things that may possibly is some crazy parallel universe happen?

    I didn't vote for the guy but can we at least wait until he is in office and doing stuff before we jump off the deep end?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  12. Suddenly worried by roninmagus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All of a sudden, the left and the media are afraid of the powers that have been given to the president...

  13. Re:Yes? So? by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Correct. This is a totally sensationalist story.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  14. Democrats are the enemy by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate pointless fear mongering articles. Best example of fake news there is right here on slashdot.

    Trump isn't likely to abuse the alert system but leave it to slashdot to make an issue of it.

      Trump won. Get over it already.

    I'm so weary of all this one-sided bickering and sniping over Trump that I've decided that Democrats should be considered enemy combatants.

    To be more clear, I now consider Democrats to be the equivalent of the "other side" in a war - they will still oppose every and any thing your side does, they can lose a battle and still wage war, incessant and total non-compliance, they will fight to the last man, and any victory - even pyrrhic - is still a victory. Any means are justified in the pursuit of their ends.

    All the things an unruly child does, but forever.

    In my mind the Democrats are *permanently* a party of dishonour, disgrace, and corruption. A group that simply gets no "benefit of the doubt" or "concessions of fairness" or anything like that. They are children, now and forever. We should treat them as such.

    I was thinking through the recent news (last night) that Trump got Carrier to keep 1000 jobs in the US, and how I couldn't see a way to frame that in a bad light. Lo and behold! Recent comments on Slashdot manage to paint this as a bad thing. They even pulled out the Hitler comparison for good measure.

    The Democrats are defeated. Leaderless and feckless, the only thing they can do is complain.

    No plan, no leadership, and rife with corruption.

    It's hard to see why anyone would be a part of that crowd.

    1. Re:Democrats are the enemy by Mab_Mass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be more clear, I now consider Democrats to be the equivalent of the "other side" in a war - they will still oppose every and any thing your side does, they can lose a battle and still wage war, incessant and total non-compliance, they will fight to the last man, and any victory - even pyrrhic - is still a victory. Any means are justified in the pursuit of their ends.

      So... in other words, the Democrats are now going to do what the Republicans have been doing for the past 8 years.

  15. Re:Yes? So? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why is this even showing up on a tech forum?

    Because Donald Trump is technically a sociopath?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  16. Re:Yes? So? by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because Donald Trump is technically a sociopath?

    Then you must be REALLY relieved that the Clintons didn't get the executive power they were hungry to regain.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.