Slashdot Mirror
British Film Institute To Digitize 100,000 Old TV Shows Before They Disappear (bbc.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from BBC: Thousands of British TV programs are to be digitized before they are lost forever, the British Film Institute says. Anarchic children's show Tiswas and The Basil Brush Show are among the programs in line for preservation. The initiative was announced as part of the BFI's five-year strategy for 2017-2022. "Material from the 70s and early 80s is at risk," said Heather Stewart, the BFI's creative director. "It has a five or six-year shelf life and if we don't do something about it will just go, no matter how great the environment is we keep it in. "Our job is make sure that things are there in 200 years' time." The BFI has budgeted $14.3 million of Lottery funding towards its goal of making the UK's entire screen heritage digitally accessible. This includes an estimated 100,000 of the "most at-risk" British TV episodes and clips held on obsolete video formats. The list includes "early children's programming, little-seen dramas, regional programs and the beginnings of breakfast television." The issue for the BFI, Ms Stewart added, was also to do with freeing up storage space. "We have a whole vault which is wall-to-wall video. If we digitized it, it would be in a robot about the size of a wardrobe," she said.
The whole point behind Tiswas was that it actually wasn't a kids show.
In the past a human might have to walk into a vault. Find film or a tape. Find the expert help with the playback system. Work to ensure playback would not further risk the media.
A few very different video systems got used by different nations over the decades.
A "robot" would be a digital system that just ensures the storage media is ready, indexed, seachable given the amount of digital material thats ready to access.
No more walking into a vault with a shelf number, location and finding a rare video format. The robot will just playback the video clip on demand.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Episodes of Dr Who and The Goodies are gone because they were not on that sort of list. Significant or not a non-trivial number of people would have wanted to see them and even shell out cash to do so. As an example, a restored version with animation of Dr Who "Power of the Daleks" was recently in cinemas.
Choosing a narrow list has already lost us some interesting material so it's probably a good idea not to tightly restrict this time either. There will be gems among all the muck.
100,000? That'll cover, what, 5% of Dr. Who episodes?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Presumably, they plan to digitize it and store it in various places. But, once it's digitized, they can migrate it towards new storage devices relatively easily as well as monitor the integrity of the entire catalog and repair the broken files as need be.
As long as they migrate the content to newer technology regularly, it shouldn't be much of an issue.
The really hard bit is going to be the initial scan and import of the materials and doing so in a way that they get all the possible data off the current copies.
A friend of my sister's worked there and gave us a tour when we visited. He showed us their vault room where they kept all their videotapes. It wasn't very big, so I asked him since there were so many different sporting events going on every day, how long did they save the recordings of these events. He said most of the stuff (local sports, lower-interest stuff like non-Olympics track events, etc) they only kept for a month or two. Pro sports were kept at least a year, longer for more important games. Playoff finals and particularly notable games, they'd keep indefinitely. But most of the "memorable" events could be boiled down to just a few highlight clips (e.g. a world record-breaking long jump).
A shocking amount of stuff gets erased or tossed out simply because there's no space to save it (or need at the time). If you think about everything everyone does every day, it's a mindboggling amount of material which is produced daily, So it's inevitable that a lot of it is going to be lost (hopefully with a summary or end result saved). You have to be obsessive/compulsive to want to save everything.
Yes. People call LTO6 tape autoloaders with a storage library "robots".
Going back to old TV, the opening sequence of each episode of the show "The Prisoner" depicts the idea of that sort of "robot" being used for paper card storage instead of a few dozen tapes.
Not a bit. Benny H never made fun of wogs, so you would probably call him PC.
Fat lot you know, you cunt. All of the Benny Hill shows have been torrented. And it's "weak".
You are welcome on my lawn.
Some of the Dr. Who were already lost, and reconstructed by fans from audio and photographs, though I believe some were found recorded in Nigeria.
I believe that was mostly older material from the 60s where the original source was intentionally purged and reused. In this case it seems the issue is the original material exists but won't live forever.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
Don't worry. They'll just store it all in "the cloud" and it'll last forever.
The Basil Brush Show
Is that with or without the running defense of iOS?
Boom boom.
Such a process resulted in the losses I gave as examples above. An afternoon drama for children didn't seem all that important culturally so Dr Who episodes that could be making money for the BBC were thrown away.
The easy way to preserve old content is to restore the public domain, and limit the current infinitely extended copyright.
Currently, most every audio and video recording ever made is copyrighted and extended every few decades to protect the interests of a few large companies.
As a side effect, preserving old media is often illegal without permission/licensing (which may be impossible), even if the media is abandoned.
If there was a reasonable limit on copyright duration, then preservation occurs naturally by the public.
In the current model, public preservation is strictly prohibited and prevented with DMCA and similar, and old media may just disappear.
But that would be stealing from Disney, you dirty commie hippy!
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
It will be digitised and then stored on 2 different tape formats - currently IBM TS1150 and LTO-6 in Spectralogic tape libraries. There are systems for regular data integrity checks and a migration path.
Sadly too much has already been burnt by the BBC :|
Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.
Shockingly, people can find old things funny. And they can find it funny today for different reasons than those for which audiences found it funny originally. Hell -- sometimes, comedy is funny today for the same reasons it was funny when it was new.
Jeffrey Fucking Crust Almighty, just let people enjoy shit.
Congratulations! You just disproved the theory that Americans (and especially us Texans) are the most arrogant people on Earth!
Talk about misinformed. We didn't "find it 20 years later". I'm 50. I watched Benny Hill and Monty Python with my folks in the 70s. I watched Red Dwarf in the 80s and 90s on PBS here in Houston. On November 8 I bought Red Dwarf series XI on blu-ray, less than two weeks after it finished airing in the UK.
Monty Python: Introduction to North America
In the summer of 1974, Ron Devillier, the programme director for nonprofit PBS television station KERA in Dallas, Texas, started airing episodes of Monty Python's Flying Circus. Ratings shot through the roof, providing an encouraging sign to the other 100 PBS stations that had signed up to begin airing the show in October 1974—exactly five years after their BBC debut.