Slashdot Mirror


For The UK's 'Snoopers' Charter', Politicians Voted Themselves An Exemption (independent.co.uk)

The "Snoopers' Charter" passed in the U.K. greatly expands the government's surveillance power. But before they'd enact the new Investigatory Powers Act, Britain's elected officials first voted to make themselves exempt from it. Sort of. An anonymous reader writes: While their internet browsing history will still be swept up, just like everyone else's, no one will ever be able to access it without specific approval from the Prime Minister. And according to The Independent, "That rule applies not only to members of the Westminster parliament but also politicians in the devolved assembly and members of the European Parliament."
The article adds that the exemption was the very first amendment they approved for the legislation. And for a very long time, the only amendment.

6 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Surprising? Not so much. by kuzb · · Score: 5, Informative

    The UK masquerades as a democracy, and has for a long time. In reality it's the most hilariously over the top nanny state, The politicians there seem to make up laws for the sake of making up laws. I often wonder if this is just to give the illusion that a politician is doing something because fixing real problems is too hard.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  2. Not quite by admin7087 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Prime Minister can still allow access to the browsing history of his political opponents, should there be a need for it.

  3. Why did you let them do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Brits, why did you let them do this? You're letting them take your freedom and letting them grant themselves powers that will keep you out of the loop and perpetuate their own power, preventing you from being able to do anything about it in the future. And what can you do to stop this from snowballing? Absolutely nothing now.

    Basically everyone in here is like "well we're fine we can circumvent this with encryption" yeah for now, but why bother implementing laws you have to circumvent? Just get off your asses and get rid of the root of the problem. Oh wait you can't do anything about it.

  4. Re:In retrospect, by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because all the US gunowners have stepped up to fight the State in their never ending desire to track you more?

    Where were the Gun owners after the the Patriot Act? Or the NSA leaks? Or any time a local sheriff forgets about the 4th amendment?

  5. Re:Surprising? Not so much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Teens sexting each other is not a problem to be solved. Adults sexting minors is about as solved as it's going to get, going down the legal system road. If you want to lessen the problem, we're going to have to explore other avenues besides making it illegaler.

  6. Re: Surprising? Not so much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    What the actual fuck is wrong with you "Republic" clowns ?

    The US is supposed to be a democracy.

    A republic is one form of government. A democratic vote is how its selected.

    Fuck.