Slashdot Mirror


Samsung's Upcoming Galaxy S8 Flagship Smartphone Won't Have a Headphone Jack: Report (sammobile.com)

Samsung is planning to ditch headphone jack in its next flagship smartphone, called the Samsung Galaxy S8, reports SamMobile, a Samsung-focused blog that has a pretty good track record with these things. From the report: Removing the 3.5mm headphone jack enables Samsung to make the Galaxy S8 thinner while also freeing up more space inside for a bigger battery. Samsung may also integrate stereo speakers which some believe will be made in collaboration with Harman, a company that Samsung is acquiring for $8 billion.

5 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Soooooo lesson not learned? by H3lldr0p · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wasn't there an article yesterday saying that the battery problems with the G7 Note largely due to it being too thin? Which, given the circumstances seems to be a fairly strong thesis for the trouble. So why try to go thinner?

    I get there's a lead time on design and engineering and that it's quite likely this particular design has been in the works before the Note 7 was even out the door. But it seems like poor management to not backup and start over just to be certain the same design flaws don't happen again. Starting by not having thinness as a goal.

    Then again, I'm not an exec working on their quarterly bonus. I'm just a guy on the internet.

    1. Re:Soooooo lesson not learned? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wasn't there an article yesterday saying that the battery problems with the G7 Note largely due to it being too thin? Which, given the circumstances seems to be a fairly strong thesis for the trouble. So why try to go thinner?

      Samsung's problem was with the Galaxy Note 7 not the S7. (TFA is about the S8.) And the problem was not that the Note 7 was too thin, but that it was too thin for the battery. They should have provided about 0.5 mm room for expansion. They didn't, and as a result, the battery was squeezed when it expanded, and parts of its internals touched that were not supposed to. And kaboom.

      I get there's a lead time on design and engineering and that it's quite likely this particular design has been in the works before the Note 7 was even out the door. But it seems like poor management to not backup and start over just to be certain the same design flaws don't happen again. Starting by not having thinness as a goal.

      Given the disastrous blowback from the Note 7, I doubt they'll let anything in the 8th generation leave the factory until it's ready.

      Disclosure: I own an S5. It does get warm if I'm charging it in my car with Google Maps running and it's in sunlight. But otherwise it has been trouble-free as far as heat is concerned.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  2. Re:Sweet by fizzer06 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Samsung fouled their nest, so I jumped ship to LG V10. Has user removeable battery, Good phone.

  3. Re:Copying Apple by aergern · · Score: 4, Informative

    They've already said it's going to be USB-C and the audio will use that port.

    --
    Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
  4. Re: Sweet by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Informative

    A headphone jack can be all metal and plastic sealed tube and does not have to open up to the inside.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.