Slashdot Mirror


Pebble Gets Acquired By Fitbit - Ends Production and Ceases Support Of Its Existing Lineup of Smartwatches (getpebble.com)

Reader phorm writes: In a notice to Kickstarter backers, pebble has stated that -- following the acquisition by Fitbit (official now) -- they will no longer promote, manufacture, or sell devices. Further, while existing functionality may continue, it is likely to be degraded and warranty support will no longer be provided. This includes any recently shipped Pebble models. For those that were eagerly awaiting shipment of Pebble Time 2 and other newer devices, those devices will not ship at all. Pebble has indicated refunds will be made within 4-8 weeks. Those expecting their money may not want to hold their breath, however, because a contradictory statement made by to backers by email says that refunds will be made via Kickstarter by March 2017.Fitbit said it is only purchasing software assets from Pebble.

193 comments

  1. movie ref time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    1. Re:movie ref time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I once bought a Pebble watch only to return it when I found out it artificially wouldn't work unless I created yet another account with Pebble, which is just ridiculous. One of the concerns I had is that when Pebble goes under, my device would cease to function. I remember a number of shills and apologist millennials saying that would never happen, Pebble be around forever and was in no danger of closing shop, etc, etc.

      I would just like to voice the following to those naive individuals now: LOL! You stupid suckers, enjoy your useless watches.

    2. Re:movie ref time by dns_server · · Score: 1

      There is an open source application called gadgetbridge that can replace the pebble phone app.
      https://f-droid.org/repository...

  2. Warranty Support? by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but wouldn't Fitbit be obligated to honor the original warranty (or whatever laws are in place in the nation it was purchased in)?

    1. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not purchasing the company, just some engineers and software. The company is disappearing.

    2. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but wouldn't Fitbit be obligated to honor the original warranty (or whatever laws are in place in the nation it was purchased in)?

      Fitbit buys Webster in order to redefine the word "obligated".

    3. Re:Warranty Support? by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

      No, sounds like Fitbit is acquiring people not the actual company and it's assets.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Warranty Support? by mlyle · · Score: 1

      Yes. You're a creditor like anyone else. Get in line. (Probably not all of those with secured claims are getting paid).

    5. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't detect sorrow in your tone.

    6. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My guess is they're not buying Pebble (the company), but the rights to the software (the IP asset owned by the Pebble copmany) and the rest of Pebble (the company) is being liquidated. Thus, the legal entity that that would have had to honor the warranty would simply no longer exist.

      That's my guess.

    7. Re:Warranty Support? by Tukz · · Score: 2

      Sounds like they are acquiring software assets and possible human resources but not the actual company.

      According to TFA, Pebble is shutting down.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    8. Re:Warranty Support? by mlw4428 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're sort of right. Apparently they're acquiring the IP and also hiring some of the employees that are now jobless. The shell company still technically exists and will go into bankruptcy and probably receivership shortly thereafter.

    9. Re: Warranty Support? by bistromath007 · · Score: 1, Funny

      There shouldn't be. If you buy a smartwatch, you've already been ripped off and you have too much money for me to care.

    10. Re:Warranty Support? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      So... if that is possible, why would any company choose to acquire the debts and obligations of the company they are purchasing?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    11. Re:Warranty Support? by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

      So Pebble (the company) continues to exist (perhaps in receivership) until all it's debtors (which includes warranties) are satisfied.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    12. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are more than a few people, it makes it more difficult to just "buy" all of them. The person selling those debts, obligations, and IP also might not be willing to sell them individually.

    13. Re:Warranty Support? by galabar · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't sale of these assets be complicated by the bankruptcy?

    14. Re:Warranty Support? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If they purchased "substantially" all the company, they are still obliged. The only way out would be for Pebble to have declared bankruptcy BEFORE Fitbit bought the assets, same as GM did to shed its' pension liabilities. Guess they need someone to whack them in the head. If GM had to do it that way, you can be sure that some piss-ant business doesn't have enough clout with the courts to do otherwise. Just because it's tech doesn't mean that the laws don't apply to them, despite all the wishful thinking Uber ("we're not a taxi service") and Apple ("touch disease is not a manufacturing or design defect") want you to buy into.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    15. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, because by backing a kickstarter project, you are not purchasing the product. You are giving a bunch of people money with no legal expectation of receiving anything in return.

      This is why Kickstarter is the biggest fucking scam operation ever to grace the Internet. You are not investing in a company. You have no ownership. They have no fiduciary duty to you. You have no recourse. They don't have to give you ANYTHING in exchange for your money.

    16. Re:Warranty Support? by galabar · · Score: 1

      That's if this was an actual bankruptcy. If the Pebble owners sold, thinking they made a profit, they may be rudely surprised.

    17. Re:Warranty Support? by mlyle · · Score: 2

      Yah, asset sales aren't made in those situations and I'm sure there was competent counsel present.

      There's probably no bankruptcy filing now (it's often not advantageous in this type of situation, but --- 99.999% chance this is going chapter 7 or orderly dissolution.

    18. Re:Warranty Support? by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they're selling first and THEN entering bankruptcy.

    19. Re:Warranty Support? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that selling off all your assets right before entering bankruptcy is a reason to have those sales reversed by the courts.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    20. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize both Uber and Apple are getting away free and clear with both of those policies, right? Kinda fucks up your whole point.

    21. Re:Warranty Support? by srw · · Score: 4, Informative

      The original "Pebble" was "assigned" to an "Assignee" corporation, which sounds a lot like a bankruptcy trustee. It appears this is the way it's done in California. (I would be happy to hear from someone who knows more about this.) So, no, Fitbit is not obligated to do anything. They bought _some_ IP from the assignee which allows the assignee to pay off some of the creditors.

    22. Re:Warranty Support? by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but it's probably because Pebble was a failing company. Failing companies are often split up with assets going to the highest bidder, which for larger companies is generally a holding company that turns around and then resells those IPs/assets for a profit. Mitt Romney's company did this. If, however, it's two successful (still profitable) companies, shareholders don't want to be stuck holding the bag for a profitless company with nothing but debt - so in order to buy the assets, the purchaser has to agree to buy debt and pay a price that shareholders want.

      Although it is possible for a still profitable company to sell off entire divisions/assets that it wants to divest: see Google and Motorola.

    23. Re: Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been able to *buy* watches on their website for years.

    24. Re:Warranty Support? by DRJlaw · · Score: 3, Informative

      My understanding is that selling off all your assets right before entering bankruptcy is a reason to have those sales reversed by the courts.

      No, a fraudulent sale is a reason to have sales unwound by the courts. If you have an arms-length transaction with a willing buyer at a reasonable price, you haven't done anything that a bankruptcy court wouldn't oversee and approve in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

      The company is done. Even in bankruptcy (which is likely coming), those assets would be sold, the obligations left with the defunct company and discharged, and the cash doled out first to the secured creditors, then (if any is left) to others. There's a rather complex hierarchy of priority, and who gets what amount of cents on the dollar is frequently negotiated, but customers are essentially unsecured creditors and very low in the priority scheme.

      In short, you're not going to be able to force someone who only is interested in buying IP to also take on order, warranty, and support obligations for the product.

    25. Re:Warranty Support? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      No, Uber is in court all over the place and having to iron out agreements with municipal and state governments, has been held to be an employer, and is facing class action lawsuits, while and Apple is facing several class action lawsuits over touch diseased iPhones spontaneously becoming i-Can't-Phones.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    26. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that this is something you could never do or get away with as a person. Rob someone, declare that you're a different person now really, and not have to hand the money back nor do any time. The law only exists for little people after all.

    27. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      haha. You are funny.

    28. Re:Warranty Support? by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      So... if that is possible, why would any company choose to acquire the debts and obligations of the company they are purchasing?

      Because oftentimes they are buying a functioning business and they must. The secured creditors must release their security interests, the unsecured creditors can file suit and argue that there is successor liability, etc.

      The situation is entirely different when the business is failing. Sure, you can't fraudulently sell assets for less than their reasonable value, carve up lines of business in odd ways to separate the revenue-generating portion of the line from the obligations of the line, etc. But you can sell off profitable lines of business for their value, or sell off assets for their value, while keeping the obligations and satisfying those that you can. That's exactly what happens in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy -- functioning parts and things that can be salvaged are sold so that they remain productive assets for someone, with the proceeds going to offset the debts. Since the cash, proceeds, and value of any remaining assets are usually less than the sum of the debts and obligations, there losses are allocated amongst the creditors. And customers are just a different, unsecured class of creditor.

      Pebble will end up in bankruptcy, sooner rather than later. Lawyers for the creditors will look at what happened in a period before the bankruptcy to see if there is any way to recover additional funds, but so long as the transactions were reasonable, they won't be undone.

    29. Re:Warranty Support? by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Though technically true the creditors would have to take action and all indications are the Pebble was out of business, with excessive debt and insufficient revenue to cover costs and the indications are they shopped around for a buyer. The creditors could get the sale reversed but only under the assumption that they can locate a better offer, and one of the components of the deal are gone and can't be recovered (the employees). I read a news article that said Pebble had been shopping themselves around for 2 years.

    30. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is correct, such sales are called preferences or preferential transfers, and they can amount to fraud.

    31. Re:Warranty Support? by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, I used to work for a company that grew substantially through acquisition. We never actually "purchased company X", nor were any staff allowed to use those terms. They acquired "certain assets and liabilities of company X". Exactly which assets & liabilities are hidden in the contract that's not usually open to the public. Share holders seldom see or care about details since they're only voting on ROI. All the undesired pieces the acquiring company wants to shed don't make the transition. "Undesired Pieces" include corporate staff (AR/AP/HR are no longer necessary as they are redundant), leases on property not wanted, outdated assets like old servers/pc's or not needed, leases and support contracts, or other liabilities like outstanding litigation (or warranties). You just give the seller enough money (or maybe its a way out of some problem) in the sale and say " this ancillary crap is your monkey", You're really just cherry picking the stuff you want. In this case, FitBit is buying the intellectual property and killing off competition. It just shows that the money whores who started Pebble never gave a rats rump about customers or product.. It was all about the coin. And no, they won't be able to start some new company, these type of acquisitions always come with heavy "do no compete" clauses.

    32. Re:Warranty Support? by sdinfoserv · · Score: 0

      if the board votes to disband the company. it's gone. If any debt exits, it's tied to a defunct name and good luck with that.

    33. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes, it's because they're trying to buy the future rights that the company has as well (buying as a going concern.)
      Sometimes, they've simply not -- but they've really bought the brand and thus they're making sure the brand is worth something by upholding a moral (rather than legal) obligation. Or they might uphold the obligation to the public to preserve the brand, but the suppliers to the ill fated company? Not so much.

      Or they've bought the supply chain.
      Or it's a hostile take-over and this is the only way to do it.

      Basically... is it more useful to them as a going concern or as some assets? And is one of those assets, a 'brand' that can be damaged by not meeting public expectations?

    34. Re:Warranty Support? by naughtynaughty · · Score: 2

      Only if the sale wasn't an arms length transaction for fair value.

      You are confusing the sale of assets with a company paying SOME of its debts prior to filing for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court could claw back some of the debt payments.

    35. Re:Warranty Support? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Citation, please.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    36. Re: Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My smartwatch cost $11 with free shipping from Hong Kong. It does everything I want in a smartwatch and can even function as a standalone mobile phone.

    37. Re:Warranty Support? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You can't just disband a company and *poof* all your debts are gone.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    38. Re:Warranty Support? by galabar · · Score: 1

      So, the money taken in from the sale would be up for grabs?

    39. Re:Warranty Support? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      You can only claim debts from the company to the limit of what the company has. And once that's gone, *poof* the company is gone. The people that started the company have their personal assets outside of the PTY LTD company which is kind of the point.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    40. Re:Warranty Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fitbit barely honors the warranty on their own devices, and then only to the exact letter of the warranty.

      Take the Charge HR. If you go to Fitbit's community forum, you'll find large numbers of customers complaining that the unit physically falls apart sometime between six and 18 months after purchase. The number of identical complaints strongly suggests that it's a fundamental design flaw. At one time, Fitbit offered replacement units to people whose Charge HR fell apart a month out of warranty, but no longer. A company that cares about its customers would extend the warranty for an issue like this that's due to a design flaw and widespread; Fitbit instead hides behind the warranty, and postures that they're wonderful because they'll offer you 20% off full list price on a new Fitbit product that may have similar flaws.

      And if the case doesn't peel off... well, the Charge HR's non-replaceable battery tends to die before two years are up.

      Fitbit's customer service seems to be one of the best advertisements for the Apple Watch. They're certainly driving a lot of their former customers toward the competition.

      This is not a company that is going to assume any warranty obligations it doesn't have to.

    41. Re: Warranty Support? by tidepool · · Score: 1

      Fuck yes.
      It also shows you how fucking pointless money is once you have enough for food, shelter, heat...

      Those needs are real. Everything else is completely fabricated or meta. You need a car to get to get to job, to pay for car....

    42. Re:Warranty Support? by guruevi · · Score: 2

      Obviously, but Pebble will still have assets and can thus satisfy their contractual commitments to their customers. It seems like FitBit is only acquiring patents (I thought the Pebble ecosystem was promised to be open source at some point) so Pebble as a company will continue to exist until it has settled all debts and claims. If there is an office building, or hell, a desk chair, the company will have 'assets' so it can liquidate those.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    43. Re:Warranty Support? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      And if no one shows up to answer your call, email or letter, or even just the doorbell? You can have a defunct company that has to honor a warranty, but you can't make any individual show up to help you. What are you going to do to the company to force compliance? Fine it? Dissolve it?

    44. Re:Warranty Support? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      No.

    45. Re:Warranty Support? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      https://www.kickstarter.com/pr...

      If they were going out of business for 2 years, why the HELL did they sell me a watch in a Kickstarter that I just received last month? I paid $99 for a watch that I have just lost the warranty (I just paid for) on according to their email.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    46. Re: Warranty Support? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      https://www.kickstarter.com/pr...

      They weren't terribly expensive frankly.

      My Citizen watch cost me way more money.

      https://smile.amazon.com/Citiz...

      But I guess no matter how much you spend on things, someone will have an issue with wasted money.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. New type of Kickstarter scam by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    Get bought out before dropping support. Laugh all the way to the bank.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:New type of Kickstarter scam by mlyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More like.. go bankrupt but partially manage to pay off your bank debt by selling some assets to FitBit.

    2. Re:New type of Kickstarter scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hardly. At one point Pebble were offered more than $700 million by Citizen Watch, which they turned down. Now it's a fire sale. I guess that's on the top ten of history's greatest regrets.

    3. Re:New type of Kickstarter scam by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Not even close to the AOL - Time Warner merger.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:New type of Kickstarter scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of giving it all back to the community that funded you. Since they're going bankrupt anyway, they could have given everything back to the community. Instead, they're selling it off for an additional payout for themselves.

  4. Sad by WoodburyMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I backed the original Pebble, then later the Pebble Time Steel. I had backed the Pebble Time 2, and I am HIGHLY disappointed with both Pebble and Fitbit for not honoring those pledges. Even with degraded support or updates, I would have loved to have what I paid for. And shame on Fitbit for not honoring support or warranty for the company they are buying. The worst of it is there are users with BRAND NEW Pebble 2 devices, only days old, that now have no warranty and no support period. What's even worse is that there are no other comparable smart watches. I'm one of the few that love smart watches, despite the current trend and downfall of many of them, as I've owned them going back to Calculator Watches, then Fossil Abacus PalmOS 4.x watch, and many others. I tried a Android Wear watch but grew dissatisfied with it as the battery on both those and Apple watches in most cases do not even last a full day and are now *always on* display like ePaper watches are. I tried a Fitbit way back, as a health monitoring before they added step counters into Pebble. I hated it, and got it returned after the device stopped working a month or two later. This only solidifies my opinion of "Never again Fitbit"

    1. Re:Sad by Tukz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And shame on Fitbit for not honoring support or warranty for the company they are buying.

      But they're not buying the company.
      This is from TFA: "We have made the tough decision to shut down the company and no longer manufacture Pebble devices"

      Sounds like they sold software right to FitBit and are shutting Pebble down.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    2. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make no mistake, this was an aqui-hire. Fitbit hired the people by buying the company. They weren't interested in the software or the hardware; although the elimination of a sort-of competitor isn't a bad thing for them. It's yet another example of Our Incredible Journey.

      It's sad really, because there could have been fitbits with e-ink displays, that could have been great. But it wouldn't have aligned with FitBit's "core vision".

      And incredible journeys just are sad - they seem such a waste of effort and resources just so some large firm can get a handful of staff.

    3. Re:Sad by kwalker · · Score: 2

      Which is a really great cop-out.

      "No man, we didn't buy the company, we just bought its heart. All the rest of that trash belongs in the dumpster. Fuck your watch!"

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    4. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you have a days old watch where the warranty has been canned, issue a credit card chargeback.

    5. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't speak for their products, but in this situation here, the problem isn't Fitbit. The problem is Pebble: they had debts up to their eyeballs. That money Fitbit is paying? It's almost all going into paying Pebble's debts.

      Pebble was way in over their heads. They went all in into a market that was mostly dead shortly after the first Pebble was released, instead of either diversifying or moving to some other niche.

      Sucks that people are being screwed, but, frankly, they shoudl've seen this coming. Pebble has been in trouble for a long time.

    6. Re:Sad by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure I see the logic of blaming Fitbit that Pebble sucked at business. Or that people keep buying technological dead ends.

      However, it would be a very good gesture if Fitbit had the rights to the platform and unlocked it for the community. Personally I think the best course of action would be to avoid smart watches altogether in their present form.

    7. Re: Sad by cunina · · Score: 1

      I hear you about smart watches - today, the only smart watches worth wearing (that meet all the criteria you stated) are Garmins. The Vivoactive and the Fenix 3 are excellent replacements for the Pebble.

    8. Re:Sad by b0bby · · Score: 2

      I have to say, I'm not that shocked. I got a good deal on one of the original Pebbles and, while it's kind of neat, I really don't use it much. It's too goofy to use as man-jewelry with a suit (which I rarely wear anyway), and I just don't usually need to know the time from a watch - I can look at my screen when I'm orking, and my phone is a fancy pocket watch too. I don't need to see notifications on my wrist, since I can just look at the phone99% of the time. So that leaves the novelty faces, and the novelty soon wears off.

    9. Re:Sad by TopherC · · Score: 1

      I see there that Fitbit did the same thing to Coin last May. It's nice to keep track of these things.

    10. Re:Sad by mlyle · · Score: 2

      In a situation like this, Pebble has the choice between stiffing all of its creditors (e.g. the bank, new kickstarter backers, etc) or selling some assets and only stiffing some.

      FitBit has a choice between buying some assets that they think are worth $10M to them, say, for a discount price of $7.5M... or paying off the bank for more than that and incurring all kinds of potential obligations by acquiring the whole company and getting those assets for a total price of more... or doing nothing.

      It's not great for anyone to take that first choice away from FitBit. Better this than Pebble entirely defaulting to everyone.

    11. Re:Sad by Luthair · · Score: 1

      They also had the opportunity to run their company properly and not squander the kickstarter money on Aerons, Teslas n' Blow.

    12. Re:Sad by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's right. I had the unfortunate experience of working for a startup about 15 years ago that ran into financial difficulty. Survival depended on finding a buyer but that buyer didn't want everything, only those parts of the business that they thought had some benefit for them.

      In the end, the buyer backed out and the startup folded, leaving customers without service, employees that were suddenly out of work and hadn't been paid in several weeks, and all kinds of vendors that were owed money.

      What happened with the Pebble/FitBit deal sucks, but it's far better. It sounds like there will be refunds issued (eventually) and some employees will still have jobs with Fitbit.

    13. Re:Sad by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      So to summarize...

      1) This is a dick move by the people in charge of Pebble, since they did nothing to ensure any existing obligations to their existing customers would be met.
      2) This is a dick move by FitBit, since they're basically going out of their way to make sure they're not spending a penny on any Pebble customers.

      And, most importantly,

      3) If, from today onward, you ever buy a FitBit product - you're telling FitBit "I'm okay with the way you treated Pebble's existing customers".

      Word of mouth is the only power we have; but, being tech-oriented folks, the people around us tend to look to us for advice in areas like this.
      If you think this behavior stinks, you should do what you can to make sure no one you influence will buy anything by FitBit. Prices in this space are ridiculously high already... the least these companies can do is treat their customers well.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    14. Re:Sad by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I dunno. It seems like blaming Fitbit for Pebble's financial failure.

      Let's take a consequentialist view of matters. If the rule is you have to buy the whole business and continue to operate it, even though it's losing money, Pebble goes out of business and it's customers and debt holders suffer. If you can sell of just the good bits without the obligation to continue running the failing as before, the customers suffer but the debt holders get some relief. Which approach is better?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:Sad by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"I tried a Android Wear watch but grew dissatisfied with it as the battery on both those and Apple watches in most cases do not even last a full day and are not *always on* display like ePaper watches are."

      You didn't try the Motorola 360.2. It is always-on, and battery lasts almost 2 days with light use. Inductive charging, nice round design, lots of apps, nice looking, full touchscreen, swappable bands. Just saying. Not cheap nor terribly thin, though. Of course, now we read that there are no plans for a 360.3 anytime soon and Android Wear 2.0 has been delayed until perhaps mid 2017 (waiting a year now for 2.0).

    16. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most Kickstarter situations, the credit card was already charged months before delivery. For example:

      Pebble was charged May 18, 2012. According to their updates, their first shipment was in January 23, 2013, which is an 8-month delay. If I remember correctly, their first KS actually took 2 years to fulfill all the tiers.
      Pebble Time & Time Steel was charged sometime in March 2015. I did not receive mine until September (admittedly, it was a Time Steel). That is a 6-month delay.
      Pebble 2, Time2, etc was charged June 30, 2016, with estimated delivery date of January 2017. If they are able to keep the estimated delivery date, it is still 6 months of delay.

      I don't know about your credit card, but mine requires that I file a claim within a maximum of 4 months (depending on the reason).

    17. Re:Sad by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      Pebbles are also sold in stores, as well as via Kickstarter. I got mine from Amazon.

    18. Re:Sad by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      I would have loved to have what I paid for. And shame on Fitbit for not honoring support or warranty for the company they are buying. The worst of it is there are users with BRAND NEW Pebble 2 devices, only days old, that now have no warranty and no support period.

      Welcome to the KickStarter Business Model(tm).

    19. Re:Sad by farble1670 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      2) This is a dick move by FitBit, since they're basically going out of their way to make sure they're not spending a penny on any Pebble customers.
      3) If, from today onward, you ever buy a FitBit product - you're telling FitBit "I'm okay with the way you treated Pebble's existing customers".

      Ridiculous.

      Why should they? Those people are Pebble's customers, not Fitbits. Fitbit has zero connection to those people. They never sold them a product.

      Look at it this way. If Fitbit had bought the office chairs from Pebble's offices, would you feel the same way? It's no different. They aren't taking over Pebble's products, or continuing them in any way. As for the employees, they are only interviewing some of Pebble's old, now unemployed workers. Those people have no obligation to Fitbit, and ANY company can interview those same employees if they can attract them.

      Word of mouth is the only power we have; but, being tech-oriented folks, the people around us tend to look to us for advice in areas like this.

      With your rational, I hope not.

    20. Re:Sad by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      battery lasts almost 2 days with light use.

      In other words, the battery life is abysmal? "Almost" 2 days of light use from a charge is not a selling point.

    21. Re: Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The second one, because it promotes stability by disincentiving bubble economies of boom and bust for slower, but stable growth.

    22. Re:Sad by green1 · · Score: 1

      It's only a problem if you don't sleep at least once every day. My batteries need to be charged well before my watch's one does.

      I have the Huawei watch, always on display, and it still has over 60% charge left every night when I put it on the charger. I don't see any reason I'd need more charge than that.

    23. Re:Sad by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"In other words, the battery life is abysmal? "Almost" 2 days of light use from a charge is not a selling point."

      So you never sleep? Do you have a phone with a 7 day battery???

      It takes about 30 minutes to charge the Moto 360.2. I think anyone can spare that once every day or two...

    24. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the market for a Smartwatch but Fitbit's actions convinced to purchase from Garmin instead. At least they stand by their products.

    25. Re:Sad by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy any Pebble hardware but by what I've read it seems like the right approach to smartwatches: epaper displays, software that's useful but doesn't try to do too much, long battery life. It's a pity they couldn't make their business profitable

    26. Re:Sad by iampiti · · Score: 1

      You don't really *need* more battery life but it's nice to have it and being able to forget charging for a few days.
      I currently have a Xiaomi Mi band 2 and, while it's not exactly a smartwatch I love that its battery life is long (around 2 weeks). Also, since it tracks your sleep it's nice being able to wear it while you're sleeping since you don't have to charge it every day

    27. Re:Sad by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The last thing that I need is yet another device that has to be frequently charged. My phone is bad enough, thanks very much (and I have to charge that every other day). Although having to charge a watch daily is not disastrous, it is a big enough pain that once I tried the Pebble, there's no way I would go back to something with a shorter battery life. Here's the advantage: I never have to remember to charge my watch at all, because it warns me a day in advance that a charge will be needed within the next day. It's nice to not have the cognitive load of remembering the watch -- it helps it to seamlessly integrate into my life.

      I totally get that lots of people wouldn't care, but I do. Once I experienced only having to charge it every week or so, that ability became a dealbreaker feature for me. A watch that I need to charge daily is a watch that cannot accomplish what I want it to.

    28. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving up your assets to the public domain before closing your doors so that the people that funded you get back what you promised them. That would be the moral thing to do. Instead they're selling it to a company that data mines you just because it can and forces you to pay for that privilege. There's no reason health trackers can't function locally, but instead of reporting to the user they all report back to their home cloud and force you buy a subscription to access that cloud.

    29. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should they?

      Because Fitbit is one of these nebulous hardware-cloud amalgamations that can disappear even faster than the Pebble.

      AFAIK, the existing Pebbles will continue to function. The same cannot be said about Fitbits - the devices - without Fitbit "The Cloud".

      With Pebble, you bought something (hopefully, assuming it arrived). With Fitbit, what you get is a cheap plastic chip-enable wristband connected to a company that gives no fucks about privacy or customers.

      Pebble customers simply learned sooner what Fitbit is all about. If I was a Fitbit stock owner, this would scare the hell out of me.

      That's my twisted take away.

    30. Re:Sad by green1 · · Score: 1

      Your landline phone doesn't require charging at all, yet people still bought cell phones. The increased convenience outweighed the inconvenience of recharging.
      A good smart watch is the same idea. It may need charging almost every night, but the convenience of having it outweighs the inconvenience of charging it. I have to plug in my phone every night anyway, no problem putting my watch beside it. I never liked wearing a watch to bed anyway.

    31. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't wear their phones. Having to remove my watch every day to charge would be an immense hassle.

      To make matters worse, many smartwatches offer fitness features, like distance/step tracking and sleep tracking. Those features would be mighty worthless if you have to take your watch off all of the time.

      That's why I still use my Garmin Vivofit. The battery lasts about a year and a half, from first-hand experience.

    32. Re:Sad by green1 · · Score: 1

      People don't put landline phones in their pockets. Having to take your phone out of your pocket to charge every day would be an immense hassle. And yet, people have figured that it's worth the hassle.

      I've already admitted that these smart watches don't make a great sleep tracker because of the charging, but they do so many other things well that I wouldn't give up on the whole genre because it doesn't do something that you couldn't do before anyway.

  5. fitbit sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bought my first one in march of this year. it was dead by september. i complained to support and they gave me a new one. my friend who suggested i get a fitbit got hers in february, and it was dead by october. wayyyyyyyyyy too much money for the cheap piece of plastic junk that you get.

    1. Re:fitbit sucks by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You've got it all wrong. It's an expensive piece of plastic junk. :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:fitbit sucks by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      i bought my first one in march of this year. it was dead by september. i complained to support and they gave me a new one. my friend who suggested i get a fitbit got hers in february, and it was dead by october. wayyyyyyyyyy too much money for the cheap piece of plastic junk that you get.

      You know you have to charge them, right? ;-)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    3. Re:fitbit sucks by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      One less gadget to make you angry that it exists.

      You should see somebody about that problem.

    4. Re:fitbit sucks by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      FitBit products die wether you charge them or not.

      They produce very poor quality devices.

      I bought my Pebble Steel after my FitBit died. Now the bastards have chased after me to fuck me over some more. It was only $99 so I am not out that much. They had better not pull the app from the Play Store, but I suspect they will as soon as they can.

      FitBit is the new Sony in my world. Or the new Iomega.

    5. Re:fitbit sucks by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You're projecting again. Please take your own advice and see someone about that problem. Or continue in denial. No skin off anyone else's nose.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:fitbit sucks by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      FitBit products die wether you charge them or not.

      They produce very poor quality devices.

      Hmm. That's not been my experience.

      I got the original series Pebble the Christmas before last, and it worked [Great, Awesome, Love It! -> Works OK, with some occasional screen artifacts -> Starting to get glitchy, almost unusable screen and stopped taking software updates -> Pretty much dead, can't even read the screen when it decides to wake up at all] over the course of the next ten months. Last Christmas I got a FitBit Blaze which is still going strong. It's not nearly as flexible as the Pebble was in terms of customization and adding options, but it does what it said it would do and the heart rate monitor is very reliable. The battery doesn't last quite as long as the Pebble did, but I still get a solid 5 days between charges after a year of use, so I can't complain.

      OTOH my husband has a Pebble Time Round that he purchased only 3 or 4 months ago, and so far he seems happy with it. I think both platforms have a lot to offer, so I am sad that the flexibility of the Pebble platform will now (likely) be lost.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  6. For those that were eagerly awaiting.... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Who on earth is eagerly awaiting a Pebble Time 2? Who actually wants a Pebble Time 2?

    Apparently not even FitBit wants one...and that's saying something because there is little in the world more useless than a FitBit. We have two Charge HR's in the house and they are not durable and not accurate for their intended use.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re: For those that were eagerly awaiting.... by kwalker · · Score: 2

      *I* wanted a Pebble Time 2. I backed one. There were almost 60 thousand of us!

      *I* am currently wearing a Pebble Time and have been since it arrived.

      My wife has a Charge HR and only keeps putting up with it because she's addicted to looking at her numbers at the end of the day and beating mine. She hates when she has trouble getting the screen to come on (About 30% of the time) and she hates how it doesn't show the date (Like her previous Charge did, before the band broke irreparably, and since it's integrated, the whole device was toast).

      FitBit doesn't want Pebble in the market because it was a competitor, a better one. With the PT2 we were even going to get an HR-enabled device with an always-on, daylight-readable, waterproof device with better battery life.

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    2. Re: For those that were eagerly awaiting.... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Who on earth is eagerly awaiting a Pebble Time 2? Who actually wants a Pebble Time 2?

      Me

    3. Re: For those that were eagerly awaiting.... by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      I have a Garmin VivoActive HR which I'm a pretty big fan of as an activity tracker. It beats the FitBit in every way. If you're looking for a tracker with smartwatchy features check out the Garmin line.

    4. Re: For those that were eagerly awaiting.... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I have a Garmin VivoActive HR which I'm a pretty big fan of as an activity tracker. It beats the FitBit in every way. If you're looking for a tracker with smartwatchy features check out the Garmin line.

      While I ended up recently getting an Apple Watch, I can second this (before the AW I wore a Vivosmart). If the fitness-oriented features are what's most important to you - with the smart stuff as "nice to have" add-ons - Garmin beats FitBit handily. Battery life is great (I got 8-11 days from my Vivosmart, even after a year); and when I had to deal with customer support they've been responsive and helpful. Great company.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  7. Consolidation time by iotaborg · · Score: 1

    And thus begins the consolidation of smart watch companies. We saw that Basis was killed off a few months ago by Intel. At least Intel was so kind as to offer full refunds for all of the watches.

    1. Re:Consolidation time by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And thus begins the consolidation of smart watch companies. We saw that Basis was killed off a few months ago by Intel. At least Intel was so kind as to offer full refunds for all of the watches.

      It's more like "thus begins the end of smart watches, last one going down the swirly-swirly please give an extra courtesy flush, just to be sure."

      A smartphone without a smartwatch is like a dog without a laptop.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Consolidation time by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A dog without a laptop is you in the shower.

      Or is your laptop waterproof?

    3. Re:Consolidation time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A smartwatch is the only useful case for a watch any more.

      Still not useful enough for me, my phone does everything I'd need a watch for.

      But I really can't think of a single reason to even consider a dumbwatch.

    4. Re:Consolidation time by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      i think that there are still use cases for non-smart watched. Diving is one of them. Areas where you can't bring a smartphone are another. And let's be honest - smart watches are fugly. There's no way these are fashion statements - more like shouting "I can afford to waste money on the latest fad even though it's nowhere near ready for prime time because I'm a sheeple"

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  8. Hate Fitbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not interested in your product, fit bit. Later

  9. Buy Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    You can't go wrong with buying an Apple Watch.

    1. Re:Buy Apple. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Personally.... I don't agree.

      However, it's not about any objection to Apple Watches, but to the idea behind them. Think about what you get with one of these and tell me it's worth what you pay for them. Except for the "coolness" factor, I don't really see where the things a smart watch can do are all that useful.

      They tell time: but my analog watch does that, even when I don't have my phone around.

      They can buzz and show you text messages or phone calls, but they have to be within Bluetooth range of your phone anyway, so you will have your phone on your person and it can buzz you too. I don't see the advantage of this feature.

      I hear you can use your apple watch to originate a text, but for the life of me I cannot imagine it being worth the extra effort to text with an obviously clunky user interface over using that phone in your pocket.

      Then there are the "health and Exercise" features like a pedometer to count your steps or monitoring your heart rate, but in both cases doing that kind of sensing is hard so it turns out to be of dubious accuracy and limited application. The pedometer function can be approximated on your phone with almost the same accuracy level, and the heart rate monitor is more of a "it's faster" or "slower" indicator that is of zero clinical use beyond that.

      Finally there is the battery life problem. These wrist worn smart devices are of significantly limited size and weight. Doing all the "smart" stuff requires power and power requires batteries that are sizeable and of significant weight. This means that the more stuff your wrist device does, the more often you will have to take it off for a few hours and charge it. My standby analog watch can wind itself when I wear it and only comes off when I bathe or swim (because it's not water proof).

      So if you want to have one for the wow isn't that cool factor, knock yourself out. However, some of us are not impressed with gadgets that really don't enhance our lives or serve a useful purpose.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Buy Apple. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Sure you can. The Apple Watch is an entirely different device than the Pebble, and is trying to accomplish very different goals. For my needs, the Apple Watch would be an absolutely awful choice, mostly due to it's dismal battery life and lack of an always-on screen.

    3. Re:Buy Apple. by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would I do that? I don't own an iPhone.

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    4. Re:Buy Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modding: sorry for AC post.

      Something Apple watch does that you never see posted: you can send/receive text without having your phone on you, as long as your phone is in WIFI range and on, and your watch is on another WIFI (it already is synced to), you will get your text message. I discovered this because I left my phone at home once (San Diego) and I got text messages as work on my watch (Orange county).

    5. Re:Buy Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have valid points. I use a Samsung fit. In my experience I do find enough features of the device to make it worth while to me. WOuld I buy one at full price? No but I got mine on sale for 100 right before the fit 2 came out so I am happy with what I get from it.

      Battery time for me is 3 to 4 days
      Accuracy is comparable to an analog pedometer.
      Heart rate is nifty but I think the accuracy on my note 5 is better if I want the real numbers
      Receiving texts is nice, my device can only send a few preprogrammed replies though.
      Bonus feature I like: Find my phone.

    6. Re:Buy Apple. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      They can buzz and show you text messages or phone calls, but they have to be within Bluetooth range of your phone anyway, so you will have your phone on your person and it can buzz you too. I don't see the advantage of this feature

      No they don't. They have wifi.

      I hear you can use your apple watch to originate a text, but for the life of me I cannot imagine it being worth the extra effort to text with an obviously clunky user interface over using that phone in your pocket.

      You can speak into it.

      dubious accuracy

      All pedometers are inaccurate. The important thing is that it consistent from day to day (which they are).

      limited application

      I guess you need to ask all of the people that bought fitbits and other fitness trackers and use fitness tracking apps on their other non-dedicated fitness tracker devices if it's limited application.

      However, some of us are not impressed

      Some of us at least understand the features and limitations which help us make decisions.

    7. Re:Buy Apple. by windwalkr · · Score: 1

      They tell time: but my analog watch does that, even when I don't have my phone around.

      The Apple Watch doesn't need your phone around to tell the time either. So; it's at least as good as an analog watch for this purpose (barring battery life discussions anyway).

      They can buzz and show you text messages or phone calls, but they have to be within Bluetooth range of your phone anyway, so you will have your phone on your person and it can buzz you too. I don't see the advantage of this feature.

      You don't need to be in bluetooth range, although that's one option- wifi works too. This is actually something I find quite useful:

      * My phone is always on silent and I don't always notice the buzz. It's much harder to miss a wrist notification.
      * I can quickly determine whether it's something that needs urgent attention or whether I can ignore it until next time I pick up my phone.
      * I still have access and visibility while in the shower, swimming, or if I've left my phone in the bedroom while working in another room.

      I hear you can use your apple watch to originate a text, but for the life of me I cannot imagine it being worth the extra effort to text with an obviously clunky user interface over using that phone in your pocket.

      It's really not, but I guess it's nice to have it available as a backup option (eg. if somebody else is using my phone and I don't want to interrupt them; or if i'm in the shower or holding something heavy and an urgent reply is warranted). In practice I don't use this, but I can see that some people might find it useful. You can also talk and listen via the watch, not just text.

      Then there are the "health and Exercise" features like a pedometer to count your steps or monitoring your heart rate, but in both cases doing that kind of sensing is hard so it turns out to be of dubious accuracy and limited application. The pedometer function can be approximated on your phone with almost the same accuracy level, and the heart rate monitor is more of a "it's faster" or "slower" indicator that is of zero clinical use beyond that.

      Yes and no. I think that health tracking is a big deal in the long run, but I agree that what we have now has too many compromises to be a killer feature. It's still nice to be able to track your heart rate and other exercise metrics over time, notice how lifestyle changes affect your daily walking distance, etc. For people who are serious about exercise, I'm sure that this is a killer feature, although there may be cheaper devices if that's the only feature they want. It's also nice how Apple aggregates data from multiple devices.

      Finally there is the battery life problem. These wrist worn smart devices are of significantly limited size and weight. Doing all the "smart" stuff requires power and power requires batteries that are sizeable and of significant weight. This means that the more stuff your wrist device does, the more often you will have to take it off for a few hours and charge it.

      It is possible to flatten the device prematurely, much like it's possible to flatten a smartphone quickly. That said, it's good enough for normal usage and it charges fast. Some people charge it overnight. I personally charge it at my desk during the day; it only means taking the watch off for an hour. People who drive to work could charge it during the drive. Would it be nice to have it last a month or more? For sure. But the 1.5-day battery life is not a killer, or even a meaningful annoyance in most cases.

      My standby analog watch can wind itself when I wear it and only comes off when I bathe or swim (because it's not water proof).

      I don't generally take the Apple Watch off while bathing or swimming. This is a gen 1 watch, so it's not even officially waterproof but it's rated against anything short of diving so it's fine for doing laps in the pool.

    8. Re:Buy Apple. by windwalkr · · Score: 1

      Bonus feature I like: Find my phone.

      This is an excellent point actually. Having the watch be able to ping the phone saves a lot of time hunting for phones that are under a pillow or have fallen into the sofa.

  10. Fitbit is next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wearables are a fad. Who on their right mind is going to spend hundreds of dollars for some minor functionality? And that's not the only thing: All of these devices need to be tethered to a smartphone to work properly, and for each wearable, you need a new app. And another app means another subscription, because these things just LOVE to upload all of your amazing stats to the cloud. Also, these apps are usually a piece of crap, so it also means another attack vector. And more battery drain.

    And for what? So that you can receive notifications on your wrist? Or so that you can count how many steps you made? Or notifications about how many steps you made?

    Fitbit better watch out because they could be next.

    1. Re:Fitbit is next by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


      Who on their right mind is going to spend hundreds of dollars for some minor functionality?

      Back in the 1980s, I remember thinking "If only there was a way to have my girlfriend (at the time) send me her pulse so I could feel her love on my own wrist in real-time. Of course the technology wasn't there, and wouldn't be for some time, so I had to settle for her bloody heart in a jar and 25 years in a psychiatric hospital.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  11. No Fitbit then by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1, Troll

    Legalities aside, if this is how Fitbit treats existing customers now during an acquisition, I have no faith they'll do any better on their other products whenever they can get out of it.

    I've seen some Garmin products at the store - probably I'll get one of those instead. At least they have a reputation for long-term support of their products.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:No Fitbit then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if this is how Fitbit treats existing customers now during an acquisition

      For fuck's sake, how hard is it to read a fucking summary ?

      Here's a clue "Fitbit said it is only purchasing software assets from Pebble"
      Or for the terminally hard of comprehension : Nobody bought Pebble, there was no company acquisition, Pebble's customers are still the responsibility of Pebble until they cease to be a legal entity.

    2. Re:No Fitbit then by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem is that your statement about there being no company acquisition is plainly contradicted by the actual article title!!! Look here:
      "Pebble Gets Acquired By Fitbit - Ends Production and Ceases Support Of Its Existing Lineup of Smartwatches" (emphasis mine)

      Then, in the first line of the fucking summary, it again says that Pebble is being acquired: "In a notice to Kickstarter backers, pebble has stated that -- following the acquisition by Fitbit (official now) -- ..."

      It's only at the very end of TFS that our stupid editors finally point out that the article's title is a blatant LIE!

      If you want to bitch at someone, bitch at the stupid editors on this site who can't even post an article title and summary that don't contradict themselves.

    3. Re:No Fitbit then by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I see there's at least one FitBit employee lurking on Slashdot...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  12. The Lesson? Kickstarter money is for entertainment by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> People funded product, product happens, people who built product sells out to competitor, product is killed

    Let's hope people have learned their lesson: any money they give through Kickstarter should be for entertainment purposes only. You're basically buying movie popcorn, at best.

  13. They should release the keys / apis by DrXym · · Score: 1
    If Fitbit are going to dump the platform they should just throw it open to generate some goodwill. At least the APIs and any publishing keys necessary to install apps. I don't see Fitbit garnering much loyalty from Pebble owners otherwise, nor commercial advantage from not doing it.

    And on a general point this just demonstrates why "smart" watches suck. They're closed platforms and when the platform is discontinued you're left with a bitrotten brain dead piece of crap. Just one more reason to buy a dumb watch.

    1. Re:They should release the keys / apis by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would FitBit do that? It would just enable people to continue using the devices after whatever services are officially shut down. FitBit bought they to eliminate a competitor, not to continue to support their competitor's product.

    2. Re:They should release the keys / apis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I think what happened is a dick move all around the blame truly is on pebble. Since fitbit basically bought the software and talent there is little reason for them to give any part of it away. These things are basically software as a service that's tied to a specific physical device. Allowing anyone to reimplement the service when all the company bought was the service would diminish the value. I'd think they should just give pebble customers a deep discount on a fitbit product. It won't diminish the value of fitbits acquisition

    3. Re:They should release the keys / apis by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Because the platform's dead. Assuming Fitbit have the rights to the platform, what have they to lose from such a move? Do you think any Pebble owner is going to upgrade to Fitbit if the company just lobotomized their old watch? Of course not. If they have the rights it would make sense to generate some good will by turning over the platform to the community in some way.

    4. Re:They should release the keys / apis by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they have the rights or not to say it's a dick move, but I don't blame them for Pebble's problems. Pebble almost got the idea right - their watch lasted longer than others, had an always on screen and was relatively phone platform neutral. Probably what ultimately did them in is that their watches were damned ugly and they gained a whole lot of competition from some very rich companies. All the fitness devices converged on one side with the Apple / Android Wear devices on the other. It's not exactly a huge market to start with and they were squeezed out.

    5. Re:They should release the keys / apis by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      FitBit bought they to eliminate a competitor, not to continue to support their competitor's product.

      FitBit makes no products that compete with Pebble watches, and Pebble watches don't compete with FitBit devices. Nothing FitBit makes can replace my Pebble, and everything they've said about this deal indicates that they have no intention of developing a new device that would.

      FitBit bought technology and expertise that they want to use in their own products, not a competitor. If it were just about eliminating competition, all they would have had to do is wait -- Pebble was already in deep trouble.

    6. Re:They should release the keys / apis by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      What FitBit bought was a collection of enemies. If I see a FitBit product that has fallen on the floor at a store, I will step on it in a fashion to damage it, if possible. Oops, sorry.

      Not that you have to actively do anything to damage FitBit products. They have an abysmal quality record and die on customers all the time.

      They're kind of the Iomega of wearables.

  14. Perfect timing by Anontroll · · Score: 1

    My Pebble Time Steel died Dec 4th. No wonder I was not getting any replies to my warranty support requests and emails. It is also sad that Fitbit is unlikely to make a device like the Pebble. 10 days of runtime with an always on screen was a wonderful feature.

    1. Re:Perfect timing by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      My Pebble Time Steel died Dec 4th. No wonder I was not getting any replies to my warranty support requests and emails.

      I think that, in retrospect, you mis-spelled "Pebble Steal".

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  15. Check out Huawei Fit by kosmosik · · Score: 1

    It looks decent:

    http://consumer.huawei.com/en/...

    Fitness oriented but nevertheless it has 6-14 day battery life and always on LCD screen.

    1. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by kwalker · · Score: 1

      No color on the display, no apps, no voice use, lame.

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    2. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no pointless fluff features that get in the way of its core function, lame indeed!

    3. Re: Check out Huawei Fit by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      It's the "fluff" that made it good...

    4. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by kwalker · · Score: 1

      If your core function is to track your activity, sleep, and heart rate only, sure. Some of us liked being able to handle calls (reject or answer if wearing a headset), handle our playlists, handle calendar events, and deal with notifications without whipping out our phones all the time.

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    5. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by phorm · · Score: 1

      Not seeing pricing or a place to buy it. Seems a bit limited in functionality compared to Pebble, but who knows maybe one of these will move to fill the void now that there's demand.

    6. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a retard or just incredibly lazy? Ever heard of a site called "Amazon.com"? They are $130 there.

    7. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      You can get it on Amazon for $130 (prime).

    8. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      Well for sleep activity I use Xiaomi Mi Band 1S (the 2 version is to big and I don't need display) because I find it inconvenient to sleep with my watch and I could hurt my girlfriend with it (Pebble Time Steel is quite big). It does its job very well (sleep tracking) and is just a little silicone strap. Oh and it lasts 30-45 days on single charge (!).

      Now for notifications and varius interactions with my smartphone I own Pebble Time Steel (since it lasts 10 days on battery). I've supported it from the start on KickStarter back in early 2012. I've got mine with "Kickstarter Edition" engraved on the envelope and later I've supported Pebble Time Steel. It could be better but for me Pebble was the best smartwatch on market.

      To bad they just fucked me over.

      Now this Huawei Fit technically is the closest to Pebble and my requirements. Just lacking apps and some functionality which IMHO could be implemented.

    9. Re:Check out Huawei Fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those ARE the core functions. Why would I even bother without those?

      I have no interest in a fancy pedometer.

  16. Without their needed displays Pebble was doomed by maggard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Pebble had a single source supplier for their displays.

    That source is in financial trouble and unable to produce the displays Pebble depends on.

    Therefore Pebble has no products to sell and thus no cash flow.

    Therefore Pebble has had to wind down operations and pay off creditors.

    Pebble's IP has some value to Fitbit and hiring a few of Pebble's suddenly-available engineers is a no-brainer but Fitbit has no interest in the Pebble company or it's products.

    The lesson is to be very leery of DEPENDING on a single source supplier. Pebble was a healthy going concern until they could no longer get their needed displays. Then it went off the rails.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Without their needed displays Pebble was doomed by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem here is that it's very hard to build a technological product without depending on a single source supplier somewhere. Just look at any smartphone: they all have at least semi-custom CPUs; you can't just drop in a different one, even if they are all ARM-based. Usually all the other complex chips are the same. You can design a new product (or maybe a new version that mostly looks and works the same from the user's perspective) with an alternate part, in many cases, but that's a more serious undertaking.

      Unfortunately for Pebble, it sounds like their product design was based on a type of display (e-ink) that just isn't all that widely used, especially now that e-books seem to have abandoned them. You can't make a smart-watch with a backlit LCD that runs for over a week without recharging; this is simply against the laws of physics, so e-ink was the obvious choice to make a product like this. I don't see how they really could have done anything different in regards to their screen supply choice.

    2. Re:Without their needed displays Pebble was doomed by technomom · · Score: 1

      They were using LCD e-paper, not e-ink. There's a bit of a difference in power usage.

    3. Re:Without their needed displays Pebble was doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is not true. The Pebble uses a pretty standard LCD screen. They have switched manufacturers at least twice. The first one was Sharp memory LCDs (the same as the MetaWatch used 1 full year before the Pebble was announced, and a myriad other Kickstarter watches). The second one was JDI (the same one that Garmin is using, and possibly many more). Neither of these providers are having many "financial" problems...

      The truth is that Pebble sucks as a company. They sucked when they were called Allerta, their management still sucks today. It is the second time they bankrupt themselves despite their large gross.

    4. Re:Without their needed displays Pebble was doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pebble doesn't use e-ink (the technology in Kindles and other e-readers). It uses a polarizer-free reflective LCD technology sometimes branded as "e-paper".

  17. TV ref time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And now its watch has ended

  18. Why no anti-trust investigation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Purchasing a rival company for the express purpose of putting them out of business is a crime in the US. Why is there not an anti-trust investigation into this?

    1. Re:Why no anti-trust investigation? by srw · · Score: 2

      Because that's completely not what happened here.

  19. Re:The Lesson? Kickstarter money is for entertainm by wfj2fd · · Score: 1

    What about the people who buy the products in stores who are getting screwed as well?

  20. Re:The Lesson? Kickstarter money is for entertainm by Tukz · · Score: 1

    But Pebble was an actual product, sold as an actual product outside Kickstarter.
    Brick and Mortar stores sold Pebble.

    --
    - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
  21. So sad by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    It was the only smartwatch that met my needs, and it did so well enough that it has become indispensable to me. Now there's nothing on the market that I'm aware of that can replace it.

    1. Re:So sad by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm going to hold onto my PT until it no longer functions. Even if I lose things that required servers, I'll still keep my notifications, call and music control until I am forced to give them up.

      --
      Improvise, adapt, and overcome.
    2. Re: So sad by lord_mike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They can pry my pebble watch off my cold, dead, wrist.... Huge loss... at least the developer forum says that the cloud stuff will continue to run and they are planning to spin it off to the user community to run in the future.

    3. Re:So sad by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Really disappointing. I'm really fond of my Pebble Steel. I was thinking about moving to the Pebble Time Round, but I guess that won't happen now.

      I think this comes down to a case of a company being run by engineers; one that produces a great product, but can't run a business effectively. They have to sell to FitBit for $35 million, when they were reportedly offered $740 million from Citizen last year.
      https://techcrunch.com/2016/11...

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    4. Re:So sad by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Curious, what specific functions of Pebble Time required servers?

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    5. Re:So sad by lord_mike · · Score: 2

      A lot of it, which always made me nervous as a user about its future availability. Timeline, weather, almost anything that connected to the Internet went through their servers first--a shortsighted design choice. Voice dictation could also likely be effected. The development kit is also on the cloud, as is the app store, of course.

    6. Re:So sad by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      You can get one cheap on amazon as we speak.... $100 for a refurbished one. Since you don't need to worry about the warranty, refurbished should be fine.

    7. Re:So sad by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      I should add that according to Pebble, they will update the software to be more self sufficient and not require their (or anyone else's) servers.

    8. Re:So sad by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The development kit is also on the cloud, as is the app store, of course.

      Fortunately, it was always possible to develop entirely without the cloud -- I've been doing that for quite a while now. Also, app stores aren't necessary to distribute watch apps. The app store was just a convenience, not a requirement.

    9. Re:So sad by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Yep. I guess it's something I should consider before it becomes a collectors item ;-)

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  22. Re:The Lesson? Kickstarter money is for entertainm by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I bought a number of Pebbles, but not a single one of them through Kickstarter.

  23. the rich get richer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "“It’s a bittersweet day, but I want to extend my biggest thanks to the Pebble community,”

    Right....

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Pebble wasn't a smart watch company... by magamiako1 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Funny thing about Pebble is that they weren't a "smart watch" company. They were a data mining Silicon Valley company. Pebble was looking for more data scientists than they were giving a damn about making a hardware product. I met a few of them.

    The hardware product was just barely a thing to allow them to collect the data they wanted (where their real attempt at money was in data collection and sales). "Big Data" is going belly up it seems.

    1. Re:Pebble wasn't a smart watch company... by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      What data were they collecting? There weren't any shopping apps or anything like that, and pebble User ID's were email addresses, not linked to anything significant.

  26. Re: Warrant support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are quite clearly not a lawyer. Just bcause you *think* the law should be a particular way doesn't make it so, and purporting to announce what the law is just makes you look like an ass when you're wrong.

    An asset purchase agreement, which is what this is, does not bind Fitbit to any of Pebble's existing legal obligations. Pebble still owes whatever legal obligations it previously had to its customers, exceot that Pebble no longer has most of the asserts it needs to satisfy those obligations.

  27. Who writes this crap? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I read this blog post and wish I could get a refund for the minute of my time wasted on this companies rank nonsense.

    They dump everything, say you should expect what you purchased to fail to work properly, assert all warranties retroactively null and void attempting to zero out all outstanding liabilities... They then sell all assets to another company and finally have the guts to promote that new company.

    If I owned a pebble I would sue them to just to prove a point. There is something really wrong with tech industry culture and it is only getting worse.

  28. 8 weeks from now is February 2017 by mark-t · · Score: 2

    So saying by March 2017 isn't really that out of sync.

  29. Lucky for Pebble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I generally found the Pebble limited in what it could do and it crashed often. The hardware of the first gen Pebble was pretty solid since it was supposedly waterproof to 50 metres, but the apps and syncing were flaky at best.

    1. Re:Lucky for Pebble by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      They improved over time... the hardware on the original pebbles was a little flaky, with screen tearing that could be fixed with some tape and a screwdriver. Mempry was also in short supply, which is why it crashed a lot more than later pebbles.

  30. Citation needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How so?

  31. Sad by slapout · · Score: 1

    I've wanted a Pebble for a while after playing with one in the store. I actually liked it better and the Apple Watch and Android offerings. Sad to see them go. Maybe I can pick one up cheap now.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  32. Re: Warrant support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You quite clearly are not a lawyer, or at least not one that deals with winding up businesses. Such an asset purchase agreement is considered a preferential transfer, and can be claimed in a claw back lawsuit by other creditors, or declared void by a magistrate. If the transfer was made with the intent to benefit only some creditors or owners, then the transfer could also be considered fraud.

    Ohh, and the captcha was ethics.

  33. Re: Warrant support? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    In this case it turns out that they did do an assignment in bankrupcy, so the bankruptcy approved the disposition of the assets clear of the liabilities. Without that, you don't get to just dispose of the assets to a 3rd party and leave everyone in the lurch - the people left in the lurch also have a legal claim to those same assets, no matter whose hands they are found in.

    Try giving away everything you own and then declaring bankruptcy. Any debtor can contest the bankruptcy at that point - one of my friends did exactly that - contested a bankruptcy and held it up for a year - and in the end the judge discharged the debtor of everything except the money owed my friend ($20k or so). You have to do the bankruptcy first, then obtain approval to dispose of the assets so as to make the best recovery possible for the creditors.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  34. A "fad" you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If people wearing watches for the last 15 centuries or so is a "fad" in your eyes, then I guess so.

  35. Corporate mismanagement at its finest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all of their production runs pre-sponsored by the end customers they still managed to run this into the ground? Talk about BAD management ðY

  36. sad, but inevitable by j2.718ff · · Score: 2

    I own an original Pebble from Kickstarter, which I bought before owning a compatible smartphone. Since I'm into running, I ended up replacing my Pebble with a Garmin smartwatch that also provided GPS and a heartrate monitor. (Were I not into running, I'd still be using that original Pebble, since it did everything else I wanted.) I feel like Pebble really started the smart watch revolution, and they did it right -- a simple watch that works with your phone, without attempting to replace it. Unfortunately for them, once the idea was out, any other company could copy it, and that's exactly what happened.

    Sadly, the first to market is rarely the one who lasts the longest. Hydrox is gone, but Oreos are here to stay.

    1. Re:sad, but inevitable by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I'm not into tech news these days but has anyone been able to build a smartwatch with as long a battery life as the Pebbles? I always thought epaper was the right tech for smartwatches since because of size limitations they are restricted to a small battery

    2. Re:sad, but inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reality your original Pebble would have ended up in the trash. They had defective screens. Had Pebble acknowledged that and fixed it, I would have supported them in their future releases. Instead, they destroyed user trust and never did anything to repair it.

    3. Re:sad, but inevitable by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      I'm not into tech news these days but has anyone been able to build a smartwatch with as long a battery life as the Pebbles? I always thought epaper was the right tech for smartwatches since because of size limitations they are restricted to a small battery

      My Garmin smartwatch lasts over a week if I don't use the GPS.

  37. Re: Warrant support? by naughtynaughty · · Score: 2

    They didn't give away any assets. They sold them.

    The money they received is an asset equal in value to what they disposed of (the IP)

    That isn't anything like "giving away everything you own and then declaring bankruptcy"

  38. Re:The Lesson? Kickstarter money is for entertainm by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    But Pebble was an actual product, sold as an actual product outside Kickstarter.

    Yes, but in the end, Pebble closed up shop like a Kickstarter project. The problem is the culture. A solid company would have found *some* buyer at some price point before it came to this, so if nothing else the lights could be kept on for a few years. In the end they walked away from all of their customers leaving them with a piece of cheap plastic.

  39. Well that sucks by bongey · · Score: 1

    I will boycott fitbit if they completely kill off pebble support and don't open source code either.

  40. Re:The Lesson? Kickstarter money is for entertainm by technomom · · Score: 1

    A solid company would have found *some* buyer at some price point before it came to this

    Like, maybe, Citizen?

  41. as it begins, so it ends by epine · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to blame Fitbit. But they didn't earn any positive karma, either.

    Nor am I surprised that the real reason came out of the blue, after it was too late to inform my decision (I would have bought one for spare, while supplies lasted).

    Emphasis with Kickstarter is "start". Then it quickly morphs (usually) into the same old close-to-the-vest business wisdom, and you end up with half of the advantage you wished for, and a quarter as much stability as a going concern.

    I have zero interest in any other smart watch.

    Sigh. It's a sad thing.

  42. First There was Guarantee, Then Warranty, Now.. by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    So can you: Form a company. Give a lifetime warranty. Go out of business?? If so, so much for customer loyalty.

  43. Flintstone by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    And what did Bam Bam have to say about this?

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  44. GadgetBridge will keep Pebbles going by pointybits · · Score: 1

    There's an open source app called GadgetBridge that will support all the basics for Pebbles, and will keep working even if the Pebble cloud dies. You will still be able to load new apps and watchfaces and re-flash firmware. Apps that need to access the Internet may not work (for now, devs can contribute). As a side-bonus you get greatly increased privacy.

    This is Android only, I don't know if there's an iOS equivalent (anyone?).

  45. crowdfund my exit strategy by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to make a product just annoying and threatening enough to the dominant player in a field that I can sell it to them for a few hundred million.

    To do that, I need your support. Please fund my project - if I go through normal (regulated) investment channels, I'll have to share the proceeds with my investors and I don't want to do that....so crowdfunding is perfect.

    Backer rewards include branding "sucker" on the forehead with a hot iron for $1000.

    Thanks. You have my undying gratitude, loyalty, and respect.

  46. Yadda Yadda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't the writer just say Pebble went bankrupt? Or is that not allowed in the new economy???