Slashdot Mirror


Audi Cars Now Talk To Stop Lights In Vegas (ieee.org)

Audi says its cars can now tell drivers how many seconds remain until the traffic light turns green. It's the first commercial offering of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication in the United States, it adds. From a report, submitted by an anonymous reader: Of course, nobody would pay much extra for an electronic gadget that just lowered your stoplight waiting anxiety. But this feature is just testing the waters; bigger applications are in view. The cars -- recently manufactured Audi A4 and Q7 models signed onto Audi's prime connection service -- communicate with the Las Vegas traffic management system via 4G LTE, the standard mobile phones use. The countdown appears on the dashboard or heads-up display, then shuts off a few seconds before the light changes (presumably to keep drivers from getting mesmerized). Audi manages the transfer of data with the help of its partner, Traffic Technology Services (TTS), of Beaverton, Ore. The plan is to eventually give drivers the information they need to make fairly ambitious predictions, like choosing the right speed to go sailiing through several green lights in a row. Or the system might bypass the driver and go straight to the engine's "start-stop" system, shutting it down for a long count, then starting it up again seconds before getting a green light.

105 comments

  1. So the next botnet will be Audi cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    (holds breath)

    1. Re:So the next botnet will be Audi cars by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My biggest concern is...

      How do you turn this car-to-anything-external comunication the fuck OFF?!?!?

      Geez, I mean, I don't want this crap on my car, to aid in tracking etc.

      Hell, its difficult enough to disable OnStar or any other myriad of car to base communications as it is....this sounds like even more potentially intrusive software/hardware reporting to authorities on the road.

      Hell...I guess I am going to just stick to in the future...70's muscle cars, and other older 'fun' cars to ride in, without all this crap.

      Hell, I'd pay EXTRA on a new car to get it without all this external to car communication.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:So the next botnet will be Audi cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm on the market for a new SUV and one of the features that I demand is that it does not have a cellular modem. The 2016 Jeep Grand Cherokee has one in the head unit. You can disconnect the cellular antenna but it will nag you about it every time you start it. You can buy a dummy antenna, which will stop the nags, but it will still manage to connect to the cell towers at a slower speed.

      The 2017 Ford Edge does not have a cellular antenna. Yet. It's coming though. Unfortunately, people won't see a problem with these systems until a hacker remote starts their car when it's in the garage while they are sleeping. Well, their grieving friends and relatives will.

    3. Re:So the next botnet will be Audi cars by davester666 · · Score: 2

      v2 will have an off switch, after someone reverse-engineers the protocol, builds an Arduino box that supports the protocol, and then puts it on a street corner, and randomly decides when to tell the car the light is green.

      You know there will be drivers that mindlessly punch the gas when the counter goes to zero.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:So the next botnet will be Audi cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like there will be some mindless idiot who didn't read the summary and understand that the numbers dont go to zero...

    5. Re:So the next botnet will be Audi cars by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Police Lieutenant: Captain, we think every Audi in the city has been taken over by a virus.
      Police Captain: Are you certain.
      Police Lieutenant: Well they're ignoring all traffic lights, driving less than an inch off the car in front of them, constantly on the wrong side of the road, beeping aggressively and going dangerous speeds down country lanes.
      Police Captain: Yes... But how do you know know they've been taken over by a virus.
      Police Lieutenant: They're offering me a good deal on a new Toyota.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:So the next botnet will be Audi cars by b0bby · · Score: 1

      My take from the summary is that the car is talking over 4G to the company controlling the lights, and getting the counts from them. So you'd need to worry about some kid hacking the company and messing with all connected cars, not some kid on a corner messing with one.

    7. Re:So the next botnet will be Audi cars by operagost · · Score: 1

      You know that if any appreciable number of people (like, 1% of the population should be enough) take your strategy, they're going to ban those cars from the road? It will probably take the path of forcing anyone who has a non-networked vehicle to get a "vintage" registration that limits the annual mileage.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. Such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent some time in Iceland recently and they have timers on some of their lights that count down time to green. People would preempt the lights constantly. Combine that with people trying to beat the red at the end of the cycle and how much crazier traffic is in places with people (aka not iceland) and you create a real recipe for trouble and there really isn't any benefit to having this information to begin with. Having this countdown isn't gonna save lives or something.

    1. Re:Such a bad idea by aicrules · · Score: 1

      I would like having it for me. If everyone drove like me then I'd say that would be perfect. But I definitely see your point...people would abuse it. Even with the countdown disappearing a few seconds before zero, people would time it. Oh well, stupid drivers will be stupid regardless. No timers on lights right now near me but I routinely see people who "know" when their light will turn so they'll just start creeping into the crosswalk and even significantly into the intersection in anticipation. So dumb.

    2. Re:Such a bad idea by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They have them in Japan too, for pedestrians. They put a shroud on them so that drivers can't see them.

      I bet the reason why the display cuts out a few seconds before the lights change is that the timing isn't that accurate. Delay over the 4G network and over IP networks is variable and they probably just cut it off a bit early rather than try to make it more accurate.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Such a bad idea by thebullshitpatrol · · Score: 4, Informative

      The most useful thing IMO would be the yellow-to-green much of europe has.

    4. Re: Such a bad idea by nxtr · · Score: 1

      This is part of a greater picture of progress. In the same way that perimeter sensors on cars that alert drivers of unseen objects are actually a stop on the way to automation, this too will ultimately serve as a stopgap for automation.

    5. Re:Such a bad idea by aphelion_rock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can see a few problems with this:
      I can see drivers approaching a red light looking at the display instead of looking at where they are going
      Jumping the red - knowing that it will be changing green soon - this will increase chance of collisions from people running the red the other way.
      Increase chance of pedestrians getting run over

    6. Re:Such a bad idea by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 2

      The last time I was in Germany, in the early 90s, the yellow-to-green thing was pretty annoying. If you were first at the light and you didn't start rolling when that light turned yellow, everyone would start honking at you. Didn't matter that you technically couldn't go until it turned green, that didn't stop the impatient ones from laying on the horn.

    7. Re:Such a bad idea by adolf · · Score: 1

      I carry a tool for dealing with these exact situations. Chances are good that you have one, too. I keep mine in between the ring and index fingers of my left hand, and use it to silently signify my disdain for the actions of those around me.

    8. Re:Such a bad idea by Bandraginus · · Score: 1

      All valid points, but:

      I can see drivers approaching a red light looking at the display instead of looking at where they are going

      This is why Audi has the countdown in a head up display

    9. Re:Such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep mine in between the ring and index fingers of my left hand, and use it to silently signify my disdain for the actions of those around me.

      Immature. Not helping. Thanks for playing. Next!

    10. Re:Such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, drivers wherever you come from must be an absolute disgrace. Here in China the drivers are complete idiots with no idea what to do. But even here they manage to wait for the count down to reach zero and the light to turn green.
      Seems they are more civilized in at least one way then.

    11. Re:Such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (suspiciously) Are there any women here, today?

    12. Re:Such a bad idea by chrissfoot · · Score: 1

      In the UK at least the amber light means proceed with caution so basically, you can go but don't run over a pedestrian!

    13. Re:Such a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try wumao.
      We've all seen the videos of Chinese drivers intentionally backing up over people they hit to make sure they're dead.
      And I've seen plenty of Chinese drivers anticipate the green, whether they're in China, or here in Richmond, BC. The only difference is in Richmond, they do it in the luxury cars they use to launder their ill-gotten gains.

    14. Re:Such a bad idea by pax+humana · · Score: 1

      I was in southern Germany in 2008. I loved the yellow-to-green light; no one jumped the gun and no one honked. For those who aren't aware, about one second before the red light turns green, the yellow also comes on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... The red is still on, so you are not supposed to move yet.

    15. Re:Such a bad idea by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      You know I hadn't thought about it, but now that you mention it, I don't recall it being bad in Stuttgart. I was in Stuttgart from 83-87, then in Berlin from 88-91. It was in Berlin where they would honk.

  3. Ripe, very ripe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds perfectly ripe for scads of different attack possibilities. Ranging from Bore-Them-To-Death all the way to Crash-And-Burn-While-You-Wait.

    IoT unbridled.

  4. /. expired ssl cert by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else notice /. was using an expired ssl certificate earlier today?

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:/. expired ssl cert by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Today, Putin hacked Slashdot and in the chaos an old, pre-CIA cert was in use for a brief period. Don't worry, we're now using a Russia-Approved cert, comrades. In before FAKE NEWS.

    2. Re:/. expired ssl cert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup I got that one too, cleared up a short while later.

    3. Re:/. expired ssl cert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I was unable to access for a while because of that.

    4. Re:/. expired ssl cert by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      I saw it also. Weird.

    5. Re:/. expired ssl cert by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Yup! I was going to post something truly insightful, but couldn't get on. Now I forget what I was going to say.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:/. expired ssl cert by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      At least our Russian overlords will care about UTF-8. ...right?

    7. Re:/. expired ssl cert by unixisc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not UTF-16 or above? Would love to have the capability of using special symbols when needed. We can do it on Facebook and other social media, but not here?

    8. Re: /. expired ssl cert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So you don't know how utf-8 works. Great to know!

    9. Re: /. expired ssl cert by unixisc · · Score: 1

      UTF-8 is ASCII +1 more bit - ASCII being 7 bit. UTF-16 and above would be Unicode

    10. Re: /. expired ssl cert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking, right?
      Or else you really don't know how utf-8 works!

    11. Re:/. expired ssl cert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UTF-16 is so last century, these days you should start new projects with UTF-256 at least. One of the perks is it comes with support for all Milky Way languages out of the box!

    12. Re: /. expired ssl cert by fisted · · Score: 1

      You made my day.

    13. Re: /. expired ssl cert by KingMotley · · Score: 2

      Uh... UTF-8 is Unicode as well. It's just most latin characters only take up 1 byte, while characters from the extended character sets take 2-4 bytes. UTF-16 all characters take 2 bytes (except for a few that take 4).

    14. Re:/. expired ssl cert by fisted · · Score: 1

      Absolutely weird and bizarre, a Let's Encrypt certificate that had *expired*? How could that possibly.. oh wait, they expire every couple months.

    15. Re:/. expired ssl cert by antdude · · Score: 1

      It is fine now. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    16. Re:/. expired ssl cert by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Maybe,... but UTF-64 should be enough for anyone.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  5. Countdown traffic lights by enriquevagu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meanwhile, in the rest of the world they are aware of countdown traffic lights, which provide a much simpler solution to this problem.

    1. Re:Countdown traffic lights by fermion · · Score: 2

      And some have suggested that though the countdown pedestrian lights have reduced pedestrian incidents, there have been significant negative consequences for automobile incidents. This would seem to intensity this problem.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Countdown traffic lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you put counters on ALL lights, green, red, yellow, crosswalks, and have properly timed lights, it's like clockwork.

      Saw this in Chong Qing when I was there years back.

      Hell, if you do that and clearly mark the stop lines, you can even throw in red-light cameras and HUGE fines as long as there's no tricks (hidden stop lines, improperly timed lights).

  6. Good luck pedestrians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some ignoramus will jump the light and kill someone.

    1. Re:Good luck pedestrians by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some ignoramus will jump the light and kill someone.

      Well by all means, let's keep cheering on the 0-60MPH race being championed in the electric vehicle world right now, because ludicrous speeds are all that matters. Fuck safety.

      100% instant torque and a stoplight countdown timer built into the fucking dashboard...what could possibly go wrong?

    2. Re:Good luck pedestrians by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That is for the freeways, where it's important to pick up that speed to be at par w/ the rest of traffic. Doesn't mean you do that on city streets

    3. Re:Good luck pedestrians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like wasted opportunity if you don't.

    4. Re:Good luck pedestrians by geekmux · · Score: 1

      That is for the freeways, where it's important to pick up that speed to be at par w/ the rest of traffic. Doesn't mean you do that on city streets

      Oh, what a load of bullshit. When pretty much every other car entering the freeway can't even come close to sub 3-second 0-60MPH performance, there's not a damn reason electric vehicles should be using that metric as the standard, especially when range is the far more important metric with cars that run on batteries. This whole race to performance reeks of bigger-dick syndrome, and you know it.

      Don't forget those freeway on-ramps also have to be designed to allow a multi-ton 18-wheeler to safely get on a freeway, so even the slowest mass-produced car will have plenty of concrete and asphalt.

  7. hard to see this being of value. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Funny

    the big trick here isnt getting people to drive an audi, but getting them to look up from their cellphones long enough to pay attention to the car.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:hard to see this being of value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe Audi can make a countdown app to remind people to look up at the countdown on their dashboard/HUD?

  8. affordable hybrid by lorinc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dear car makers,

    Instead of pushing useless gadget that nobody cares about, what about trying to develop affordable hybrid and electric vehicles? Right now, buying a hybrid mid-range car costs as much as buying a luxury car, which nobody sane would ever do. So please, focus on affordable green cars instead of bullshit toys.

    Sincerely,
    A Parisian stuck in the winter smog.

    1. Re:affordable hybrid by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Also, stop designing it to require an expensive subscription service instead of talking directly to the infrastructure around the car.

  9. I'm gonna bet on red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :)

  10. Rich v poor by anthony_greer · · Score: 1

    so the traffic light will cater to whats best for the person in the $100k luxury car but the kid in the beater has to be at a disadvantage on teh public right of way? seems like an equal access issue to me. Whats next? priority access to the side walk for those wearing $500 hand made Italian leather shoes while those in $50 sneakers wait??

    1. Re:Rich v poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, next will be an advert while you wait for the green light.

    2. Re:Rich v poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot that owners of $10,000 Apple Watches have priority. On those undignified instants when walking is necessary and the BMW is left behind, the watch will ensure nothing disturbs the motion.

    3. Re:Rich v poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new technologies and the 'rich' who pay the privileged tax (i.e. high prices) to be first to have it pave the way to bring the price down to the masses. please broaden your narrow minded thinking.

    4. Re:Rich v poor by Agripa · · Score: 1

      so the traffic light will cater to whats best for the person in the $100k luxury car but the kid in the beater has to be at a disadvantage on teh public right of way? seems like an equal access issue to me. Whats next? priority access to the side walk for those wearing $500 hand made Italian leather shoes while those in $50 sneakers wait??

      The $100k luxury car will be going the same speed with the same response time when it is stuck behind the beater.

  11. Why do I need this? by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    * If there is no car in front of me I still have to wait for the light to turn green (and then some in the US to avoid red light runners)
    * If there is a car ahead of me I still have to wait for them to move before I can move.
    * If I have a car that shuts the engine down when stopped (and I have driven such cars), the engine already instantly comes on when my foot lifts from the brake pedal (and if it doesn't it won't happen with the App either)
    * If you are driving in traffic you still can't beat the dynamics of all those other people (and traffic doesn't /can't act like plug flow in a pipe unless you build in major automated convoy support)
    * If it is just you on a main road then it tries to keep the traffic flowing by defaulting to green lights in your direction (and it's those pesky side road drivers who screw up your green lights)
    * If it is just you on a side road then the lights will be defaulted against you anyway.

    So what are they really trying to solve? They already have a bunch of sensors/cameras that can be used to sample traffic and tell you what the current traffic patterns are.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Why do I need this? by unixisc · · Score: 2

      They are trying to solve the lonely life of your Audi, which has no dates, and is trying its pick-up lines w/ the traffic signals. Would have a harem all over the city. Of course, what about all the Hondas, Toyotas, Fords, Chevies et al that are on the road? Don't ask

    2. Re:Why do I need this? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Even more importantly: In America, the stoplights have "hoods" on them to prevent them from being seen from any angle other than head on. They used to use a shiny substance but in direct sunlight, you could not tell if the light was green or red, so they stopped that. Regardless, the intent was to keep drivers from knowing what the other light was to prevent people from going into the intersection when the cross traffic had a yellow that was about to turn red. This violates that.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    3. Re:Why do I need this? by c · · Score: 3

      So what are they really trying to solve?

      Best I can figure is they want to eliminate any delay between the light turning green and the Audi driver leaning on the horn to let the person in front of them know that it's time to go.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    4. Re:Why do I need this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two Words:
      Launch Control

    5. Re:Why do I need this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are trying to let us know how long we have to look down and pretend we are not texting on our phones.

    6. Re:Why do I need this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not trying to solve an actual problem, it's just an entertainment feature to enable (and contribute to) Audi owners' ADD and impatience.

    7. Re:Why do I need this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just the first step.

      The next step is for the high end models to be able to trigger the lights to turn green faster (for a fee of course) so rich people don't have to wait on red lights.

    8. Re:Why do I need this? by Gizan · · Score: 1

      if i could mod this up, i would

    9. Re:Why do I need this? by Bandraginus · · Score: 1

      At a guess, if you have a known quantity of red light time, you can tune the radio, adjust your seat, etc, and not get caught out when light goes green. This should lead to lower frustration levels for both you, and the cars around you.

      For a car manufacturer who trades solely on the "experience" (let's face it, Audis are just over-priced VWs), you can hardly blame them for trying something like this.

      Personally, I think there's better technologies they could be putting this R&D money into. But hey, each to their own.

    10. Re:Why do I need this? by idji · · Score: 1

      if people know how many seconds it is to the next green light, maybe they will stop texting or surfing before the light goes green.

    11. Re:Why do I need this? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      In America, the stoplights have "hoods" on them to prevent them from being seen from any angle other than head on.

      Is that what those hoods are for? I always thought they were to make the lights more visible by keeping them out of direct sunlight. Most of them certainly aren't very effective at hiding the color of the lights facing the other direction, whether because the angle is wrong to block the entire light or due to more subtle reflections, often on the inside of the hood itself.

      In any case, hiding information about the status of the intersection is counter-productive to ensuring safe and orderly traffic patterns. The more accurate and up-to-date situational data drivers have the better. Rather than directional masks, they should be adding count-down displays visible to all drivers (not just those in late-model Audis) so that everyone has an accurate forecast of when the light will change.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    12. Re:Why do I need this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much better to just teach people how traffic lights work and fine people and take away their licences if they are too dimwitted to work out how traffic lights are supposed to work. Countdowns on every light, cameras as well while you're up there, escalating fines and demerits. Simple.

  12. Audi's can also talk to emissions testing equip by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    And they usually say "move on to the next car - nothing to see here".

    1. Re:Audi's can also talk to emissions testing equip by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, the Audi can smell the Volkswagon next to it and tell it, "Get away from me.... You stink!!!"

  13. What I want to see... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    I would like to see the countdown until the light is red, and if I'll make it at my current speed. This could help to save gas, as drivers could reduce acceleration sooner. Of course someone would soon hack this to tell you how fast you need to go to make the green (or yellow) light...

    1. Re:What I want to see... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Yeah... the only thing is, if the light is still green but the countdown timer clearly shows you that you won't make it how likely are you to actually apply the brakes?

      There is a road near where I live which has a 65mph speed limit (which means people do 70 - 85) but has several stop lights. Since that is too high a speed to slow in time on a normally timed street light, they put up these flashing amber lights which will come on 5 seconds or so before the light turns yellow. So you know very well that even though the light ahead of you is going to turn yellow in 5 seconds, it is still green right now so hitting the brakes seems like you are doing something wrong... especially if you have a bunch of people behind you.

      It took a while to get used to it and I am a native to the road. If someone who didn't understand the rules or was not paying close attention was behind me, there is a very real chance they will rear-end me. I have seen 2 such accidents (bad ones too as you can imagine) on that road in just the last year.

      So, now you have someone in a car which has this countdown timer feature. They know that the light ahead is going to turn yellow before they get to it so they apply the brakes. The light is still green and the person in the car behind doesn't have access to this timer and isn't paying 100% attention (they looked up for a second and saw the light was green, then look back down)... seems like a recipe for disaster.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:What I want to see... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Look at the pedestrian crossing signal. If it's signalling walk then you have plenty of time. If it's flashing don't walk then be prepared to stop. Some of the newer signals have a countdown on the pedestrian crossing until the light change and that will tell you exactly how much time is left.

      Most people would use this to speed up to make the light instead of slowing down. And this actually exists as this is the purpose of the yellow (amber) light.

    3. Re:What I want to see... by jezwel · · Score: 1

      if...the person in the car behind ... isn't paying 100% attention (they looked up for a second and saw the light was green, then look back down)... seems like a recipe for disaster.

      You are correct, anytime where you aren't bothering to look at where your vehicle is heading could lead to disaster.
      looking up at the road then back down again - (at what?) - just seems like poor driver behaviour.

      Saw this recently in person, when an emergency vehicle with just flashing lights - no siren - was turning across an intersection in front of me. I could tell traffic was moving strangely and slowed down, then stopped when I saw the emergency vehicle - as did the car next to me. Unfortunately the driver of the car behind that person wasn't paying attention (yes it was a green light, why would anyone stop?) and ran into the back of her.

  14. That's dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reason why the stoplights for perpendicular traffic lanes have "blinders" on them is because people's reaction to the light switching colors is a consideration of the time on Yellow Lights.

    If you have some drivers with Asymmetric information advantage: the yellow light times will be based on the general public's behavior, and a subset of that public will start moving into the intersection earlier due to the lack of surprise improving their reaction time to the light switch.

  15. The Day I Trust My Life to Software Devs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will be the day I die.

    1. Re:The Day I Trust My Life to Software Devs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You already do trust your life to SW devs....

  16. Excellent method to beat traffic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I'm told the light will change in 4.5 seconds, I'll mash the gas and I'll be sure to beat it but only if i'm paying attention to the car and not updating my facebook status and taking a snapchat.

  17. Buy a Zoe instead - affordable electric by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Go buy a Renault Zoé instead.

    - it's done by one of your French companies.
    - the newer Zoe platform features a 44kWh battery that should be okay for 200+ km between charges (rated for 125km/h).
    (the previous one had a 22kWh battery, rated for 125 km. I still manage to get ~100 km out of the Zoé of the local Car Sharing copmany even when I'm driving like an idiot).
    - you can either buy just the car and rent the battery (and the car comes rather cheap between 15'000 and 25'000+ EUR depending on the options), or you can add ~8'000 EUR and buy your own battery.

    Hybrids motors are extremely complex and that comes at a a cost.
    (you basically got both disadvantages of an ICE engine - complex delicate mechanical device
    combined with the disadvantage of an electric drive - big expensive complex battery and ancillary electronics ; also an electric motor which, although cheap, is much bigger than the standard alternator of an ICE.
    And on top of that, a slightly more complex transmission - specially on hybrid that can do both serial and parallel hybrids).
    Because of this complexity, cost is never going to go down that much.
    It's a nice stop-gag technology to diminish smog problems, but electric drive is the long term solution.
    (Specially in a country like France that doesn't rely much on fossil energy to produce its electricity).

    Electric cars - outside of the expensive battery and its electronics - can be even a bit cheaper :
    - the car tends to be much lighter for better efficiency. Depending how it's done it might drive the price slightly up (Tesla and their space alloys) or down (the newer 44kWh Zo is lighter than the older one, without being more expensive).
    - an electric motor is dead simple and much cheaper than the mechanical complexity of an ICE (it's just a glorified spool of wire, attached to a fixed ratio gear. That's why Tesla can afford to slap a 2nd one on their 4-wheel drive vehicle (the xx"D" series), and that's why most european high speed train can afford electric motors on each of their wagon.)
    (This is opposed to energy storage. On a gaz powered car, energy ist stored in a glorified jug with a cap and a tap. Whereas an electic car require a complex chemistry in the battery and complex electronic to control both the charging of the car, and the power delivery to the motor).

    Cost of batteries is going down, as car companies invest in mega-factories - Tesla is building one in Texas, Renault is building one in France - and as the demand for lithium batteries increases in modern technology (laptops, lithium-powered power tools, etc.).
    Network of charger is increasing.
    Mennekes connector is becoming standard accross Europe.
    Tesla is building their own network of superchargers.
    In France I've seen chargers in Highway rest areas.
    In Switzerland, nearly all parkings in big cities have charging spot.
    European countries burn a lot less fossils to produce electricity. (France relies on its nuclear power, Switzerland has endless supply of hydro-electric. Northern Europe is developping green sourse like solar, etc.)

    Future is in electric cars.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Buy a Zoe instead - affordable electric by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      - an electric motor is dead simple and much cheaper than the mechanical complexity of an ICE (it's just a glorified spool of wire, attached to a fixed ratio gear. That's why Tesla can afford to slap a 2nd one on their 4-wheel drive vehicle (the xx"D" series), and that's why most european high speed train can afford electric motors on each of their wagon.)

      Interestingly, not on TGVs which are among the most common high speed trains in Europe (470 trains). These trains have power cars at both ends.

  18. Not the timer by DrYak · · Score: 1

    so the traffic light will cater to whats best for the person in the $100k luxury car but the kid in the beater has to be at a disadvantage on teh public right of way?

    Nope. The traffic light still waits all the same for every one.
    The only difference is that the driver of the luxury car gets the privilege of having the wating counter of the traffic light directly displayed on their dashboard.
    (And the car will be able to shut down and restart the engine during the wait on its own if it is economic to do so).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  19. Pointless gimmicks by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    The trouble with these technologies is they don't offer any value to users. There is nothing (I|V)2V offers which is both worth doing and can't be achieved with CV and common signage.

    All these system do is provide windfalls for technology firms lobbying for legislative mandates while encouraging mass surveillance and criminal exploitation of technology. Technology for technologies sake isn't just a waste of time and money but also inherently dangerous.

    I believe NHTSA is being knowingly dishonest and misleading both the public and policy makers in pursuing their V2V aims.

    Their material and estimates fails to take into consideration current commercial deployment of CV sensor technologies for AEB/CTA with its avoidance estimates of which there is significant overlap. They are knowingly providing worthless data to justify their policy recommendations.

  20. One rule for the rich, another for the commoners by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just keep "adding features".

    Eventually, you'll meet the guillotines.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  21. Time the yellow light please by Shompol · · Score: 1

    Who cares about stop light? I need a count-down on the yellow light, and it needs to be in milliseconds... and I only needed where the red light camera is installed.

  22. Casinos by OtisSnerd · · Score: 1

    Forget the traffic lights, I want to know when it can talk to the casinos.

  23. Philippines by mspohr · · Score: 1

    Stop lights in the Philippines have large LED readouts next to them which count down the time to turn.
    Red LEDs at a red light count down the time until it turns green. Green LEDs at a green light count down the time until it turns red.
    Seems to work well. People behave themselves and don't generally do stupid things.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Philippines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same as China, just seem westerners are too stupid to work out how traffic lights are meant to work.

  24. The danger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The danger is that drivers in a hurry will use that countdown to get a jump on that red light, which is likely to result in more collisions.

  25. Anxiety by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    If someone is so anxious about the red light turning green that they need a countdown to ease the anxiety then I'm thinking the problem isn't that a countdown is missing in their life. Why are they in such a state so that they are anxious about the light turning in the first place? There are a few cases where I could see a reason for being anxious such as being late for a job interview or wedding. But if you are anxious at every red light that you come to then I'm thinking that what you really need isn't a timer in your car but either a change in lifestyle or some therapy because you're headed for a breakdown.

  26. China by kwerle · · Score: 1

    Traffic in China is insane. Don't drive there.

    But many of their traffic lights count down - which I think is awesome.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:China by PPH · · Score: 1

      Cool. A lot like the USA. Green: Everyone drives through. Amber: Everyone drives through. First 3 seconds of red: Everyone drives through.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  27. Cross traffic coming to a stop isn't a clue ? by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    Granted some lights are complicated, with all those left turn lanes. But seriously, just wait your turn. Relax.

  28. Big deal by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've been talking to traffic signals for years.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  29. Why Not? by carrier+lost · · Score: 0

    The walk signs already talk to pedestrians

    http://emndee.com/node/18

    (Shameless self-plug)

  30. Gentlemen, Start Your Engines by shawnhcorey · · Score: 1

    Thanks Audi for encouraging drivers to press on the accelerator at the end of the countdown regardless of what is happening in front of them. I mean, what could go worng?

    --
    Don't stop where the ink does.
  31. powered wagons by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Interestingly, not on TGVs which are among the most common high speed trains in Europe (470 trains). These trains have power cars at both ends.

    On the other hand, German ICE (InterCity Express) and Swiss ICN (InterCity Neigezug) both use the "no power cars / each wagon with an electric motor" configuration (though not on 1st class wagons in the swiss case to diminish noise).
    - This gives them tremendous power enabling them to climb steeper slopes than normal powercars (which is useful in hilly pre-Alpine regions)
    - This gives them very efficient regenerative braking (In switzerland, two train coming down from the Lötschberg tunnel can entirely power one train climbing up to it).

    I've also seen it on Czech Pendolinos.
    I seem to remember that Austria's ÖSB has also such configuration, but I'm not 100% sure.

    But funny that you mention: seems indeed that the French TGV are almost the only high speed trains not doing it.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  32. VIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a timer override so it's nothing but green when I roll.

  33. LV traffic lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I drove a cab in Las Vegas in the mid 80s. There was a traffic light at Las Vegas Blvd. and Paradise that was exactly minute long. It was excruciatingly long sitting there if you hit the light just when it changed to red. Passengers would also make comments on how long the light was. I discovered that if I looked at my watch when the light turned red, that knowing when the light was about over did greatly help the frustration of waiting for it to change.