Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Hits Highest Levels In Almost Three Years (reuters.com)

Digital currency bitcoin hit its highest levels in almost three years on Friday, extending gains since India sparked a cash shortage by removing high-denomination bank notes from circulation a month ago. From a report on Reuters: Bitcoin was trading as high as $774 on the New York-based itBit exchange, up almost 1 percent on the day and the highest since February 2014, having climbed almost 9 percent in the past month. It has climbed around 80 percent so far this year, far exceeding its 35 percent rise in 2015.

41 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. Reason isn't only India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Also the strong dollar and the fear of what is going to happen after Trump undoes the banking regulations that were put in place after the Great Recession are driving this thing north.

    1. Re:Reason isn't only India by dejitaru · · Score: 2

      Except Trump doesn't matter because those banking regulations have been stripped away one by one since at least the past 20 years, specifically pointing to the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act

    2. Re:Reason isn't only India by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      yep... read that as the great depression, my bad. Not even sure if any significant laws were passed to prevent what happened.

  2. In before the uneducated opinions. by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

    They are easy to spot, they include mentions of beanie babies, tulips and lists of "FACT"'s.

    1. Re:In before the uneducated opinions. by ASDFnz · · Score: 2

      Sorry, you're right, I forgot to add baseless ad hominem to the list. (you may need to look it up)

    2. Re:In before the uneducated opinions. by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      "Your the uneducated one."

      YOUR and YOU'RE.

      /facepalm

      You said that not me. I was just polite enough not to divert into your bad grammar.

    3. Re:In before the uneducated opinions. by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      I wasn't insulting your grammar, you were.

      Very rarely have I seen a slashdot troll call himself a "ignorant retard" though, it could be a first. Congratulations.

    4. Re:In before the uneducated opinions. by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't let the facts

      What facts?

    5. Re:In before the uneducated opinions. by ASDFnz · · Score: 1

      Calling it bad is just factual. Besides, I did not even bring it up in the first place. We all make the occasion error and it was not germain to the discussion. Trying to win arguments by pointing out minor spelling and grammar errors is really only the resort of the week minded.

      If I called you a "ignorant retard" because of it that would be insulting.

  3. Re:Looking forward to 1BTC/$3000 by mid 2017... by PvtVoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because this time it's different!

  4. Re:I guess there is demand by hodet · · Score: 2

    There are many well documented use cases. Just take the time to understand it. Your comment makes as much sense as saying "the Internet is only useful for criminals."

  5. Too bad it's volatile as hell by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

    Since there's no one standing behind it.

    Of course even major currencies sometimes go down (like it happened to the Russian ruble after 1991) but it's still a very rare occurrence, unlike Bitcoin where any major event can trigger a colossal loss in its value because a lot of bitcoin owners will rush to cash their bitcoins when they see something worrisome happening thus they will accelerate its fall even further.

    Also there are other purely technical reasons why Bitcoin is not a stable currency and most likely will never be. For instance it has long ceased to be purely decentralized. Nowadays you can easily say that it's directly and indirectly controlled by Chinese.

    1. Re: Too bad it's volatile as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Clearly you haven't seen the USD ten year chart.

    2. Re: Too bad it's volatile as hell by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Your argument only supports Artem's point. The USD has wandered up and down in about a 20% range in that time period. In comparison, Bitcoin has jumped around 50% within one year, and it looks crazier over long time periods.

  6. Re:Just when I think things are getting better... by TodPunk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh come on, you have to see that the blockchain cryptomancy technology here will lead to a deep AI machine big learning data revolution and finally give us the open cloud paradigm for internet of dark web things computing we've always dreamed of.

    (Since Poe's Law is a thing, yes, this is in jest).

    --
    This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
  7. Re:I guess there is demand by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fake money? Who wants it?

    All money is fake by definition. We all agree those paper bills cost something when in fact it's just worthless paper. What's more, there's hugely more electronic money and various forms of money derivatives (like shares, debts, obligations, etc. etc. etc. read this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ) right now than real banknotes. I guess it's 100 to 1 nowadays if not more.

    So real money is only 1% tangible while bitcoin is 0% tangible. Not a huge difference for me.

  8. Please stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a bitcoiner, this isn't news

    Stop posting every time it moves

  9. Pump and Dump by MMC+Monster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    having climbed almost 9 percent in the past month. It has climbed around 80 percent so far this year, far exceeding its 35 percent rise in 2015.

    Don't forget mentioning that it may actually make up all the losses from 2014.

    I like the idea of Bitcoin. It's fantastic.

    But in reality it's still trading more like a commodity than a currency. Sort of like how Susan B. Anthony dollar coins are more hoarded than used as actual currency.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  10. Re:I guess there is demand by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    I don't know who wants this stuff other than the criminals who keep trying to lock up everyone's data and demand ransom. Fake money? Who wants it?

    It is quite handy as a payment token that transcend international boundaries and VISA blockades. I can buy things from for example Russia and pay with bitcoins where I cannot pay with a credit card. All perfectly legal as per the Berne convention.

    I hold about 1.8 bitcoins. The other .2 is what I spent over the past few years. I wouldn't call it a high volume thing. But it's handy.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  11. B$7500 by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    someday James Howell's harddrive will turn up...
    you betcha...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  12. Try buying something by sjbe · · Score: 1

    So real money is only 1% tangible while bitcoin is 0% tangible. Not a huge difference for me.

    That's because you're not trying to actually buy anything with bitcoins. Go try to pay for your Big Mac at McDonald's with bitcoin and see if you can tell the difference.

    1. Re:Try buying something by murdocj · · Score: 1

      And the advantage to paying in bitcoin is?

    2. Re:Try buying something by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Sticking it to the man!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  13. Dumping Cash by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    With a mentally ill about to be president named trump the Chump many people may seek to get away from US cash as well as investments in US companies. If we get rid of Donald Chump maybe America would be a good place to invest in again. Please help dump the Chump ! Dump the Chump !

  14. Currency is a type of commodity by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I like the idea of Bitcoin. It's fantastic.

    Not if you actually understand finance and risk it isn't. Bitcoin is an interesting experiment in some ways but as a practical matter for real world use it's rather clumsy, risky and impractical. It's flawed in so many ways I barely know where to begin. The only thing about it that I really think might eventually prove valuable is the block chain technology which has applications far beyond bitcoin.

    But in reality it's still trading more like a commodity than a currency.

    Currencies ARE commodities. The term commodity is specifically used for an economic good or service when the demand for it has no qualitative differentiation across a market. A dollar is a dollar no matter where you trade it. Don't feel bad, a lot of people fail to understand this. Currencies in forex markets are traded very much like other commodities. They're just an abstract/intangible sort of commodity rather than bars of gold or barrels of oil. There is some nuance to the market just like every other commodity but they really are commodities all the same.

    1. Re:Currency is a type of commodity by bspus · · Score: 1

      "Not if you actually understand finance and risk it isn't"

      Well, I would hesitate admitting to knowing much about finance (despite holding a degree saying I supposedly do) but I'm pretty confident there are many people out there that really know their stuff and still find it fascinating

      "Bitcoin is an interesting experiment in some ways but as a practical matter for real world use it's rather clumsy, risky and impractical. It's flawed in so many ways I barely know where to begin"

      Flawed it is and undoubtedly so. But as far as practicality goes, there are use cases in which right now it is by far the most practical if not the only way to perform a few transactions.
      Sure many of those transactions are illegal (unethical is harder to define) and enabled by the existence of bitcoin but that's really now all it's about.
      Just like the internet is not only about porn, even though some people I'm sure only use it for that.

  15. Shameless pump and dump promotion by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    Did I wander into the Yahoo financial message boards? WTF? This is damn near a copy paste of every penny stock spam in my spam folder.

  16. Re:I guess there is demand by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    If you really think that inflation is going to run crazy, then instead of stuffing cash into your mattress, you can do one of the following: buy gold, buy shares in the stock market, or deposit into a savings account or certificate. The value of all of these will float with inflation. I remember getting 11% interest on a fixed-term deposit in the late 1980's. All of these have the advantage of not carrying the same risk exposure as Bitcoin, whose value can fluctuate by 20% over a few days.

  17. Re:Just when I think things are getting better... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    >So now who's ignorant?

    You, you mindless cultist. You know how to parrot the Bitcoin propaganda like any number of other morons hoping to get rich quick for nothing while understanding precisely none of the reasons Bitcoin is a giant, steaming, pile of crap that never had the potential to work for social, technological, business, and economic reasons.

    Or you're not ignorant and believe that if you lie hard enough and often enough, you can pump the price and some newb will buy you out and that's good, right?

    Either way, you're just a waste of a human being because you're a net negative for society. Maybe you're young and naÃve, and it's just for now and one day you'll be worth something as a person. If you're over 19 though... game over. This is it, the best you'll ever be as a human being. You've failed to engage your brain.

    Go somewhere else. I hear http://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoi... is good.

  18. Re:Looking forward to 1BTC/$3000 by mid 2017... by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

    Heh, yeah obviously it will not be different, it will soar and crash as it always has. However, and this is the beauty of bitcoin, no matter how hard it crashes it never really goes away and will just come back stronger than before. Bitcoin is a brilliant and terrifying idea if i have ever seen one, if it becomes what its designed to become and that's no small if, it will rock the world. Will it eventually replace nation currencies, who knows, its not as far fetched as one might think, the potential is there. We are not talking about replacing any mayor currencies to start with, but just imagine a small and weak national currency crashing and burning real badly, is it so far fetched for a small nation to pick up bitcoin? Maybe not quite yet, but if it happens at a peak of another bitcoin hype, could happen you know. And if bitcoin continues coming back stronger every time, I think it will happen eventually. Once there is one country using it, its no stretch to see a second country adopting and so forth.

  19. Re:I guess there is demand by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

    So real money is only 1% tangible while bitcoin is 0% tangible. Not a huge difference for me.

    You live in a bubble, if the difference is so small to you. (1) The USD is backed by assets, even if not directly as it was when we had the gold standard. (2) The USD is also backed by binding explicit and implicit promises that 300 million US citizens will accept it. In comparison bitcoin is explicitly backed by nothing, and no one on the planet has made a binding promise to accept bitcoin.

  20. Sucks for the guy with the missing hard drive by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Major bummer for the guy who had 10,000 bitcoins on a hard drive and threw it away.

  21. India explanation by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    The India explanation is strange: if a note is removed from circulation, people would tend to use lower value notes. Why would they move to bitcoin?

    1. Re:India explanation by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      They're trying to find a way to hoard wealth that can't be taken away by the stroke of a pen (like what just happened).
      The issue is people are working under the table and the government is trying to increase revenue by making it harder to dodge taxes.
      Keeping money in cash where it can't be traced easily is how they were doing it.

    2. Re:India explanation by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      If government is cracking on tax dodging, then how can they consider bitcoin as safe? In order to be used, money will have to be converted back into rupees, and this conversion business can be regulated. Government can monitor it for tax dodge, or even tax it on its own.

    3. Re:India explanation by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      If government is cracking on tax dodging, then how can they consider bitcoin as safe?

      Because Bitcoin isn't a form of currency (or commodity, if your see it as such) that the government has any direct control over. It's not looked as a "real money" enough to be tracked that way.

      In order to be used, money will have to be converted back into rupees, and this conversion business can be regulated. Government can monitor it for tax dodge, or even tax it on its own.

      I'm not too familiar with the Bitcoin exchange system, but I think you're overestimating the Indian government's abilities here. BitCoins can come from all sorts of places besides unreported income. People can resell items they already own (and therefore already paid tax on the income to purchase) for BitCoins, they can mine them themselves, etc. The government isn't going to immediately know the reason someone has come into Bitcoins.

      I never said this plan was a foolproof way to stop tax evasion. The point is just to make it less convenient for the general populace. The government gave everyone free bank accounts for a reason -- that was for people to use them if they want to save money. Cash is supposed to be a form money takes for actual usage in trade, not a way of storing wealth.

    4. Re:India explanation by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      I think you're overestimating the Indian government's abilities here

      Indeed, the government has little abilities to regulate bitcoin exchange in its own. But it has some teeth when bitcoin hits the local economy, either when bitcoins are converted into local currency, or when they are used for domestic financial transactions.

      In both case, regulation can uncover actor's identity and force cooperation with the tax administration. In such a situation, you can still remain anonymous and dodge tax for foreign income that is spend outside of the country, but I guess that is not the biggest concern for the government.

    5. Re:India explanation by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the government has little abilities to regulate bitcoin exchange in its own. But it has some teeth when bitcoin hits the local economy, either when bitcoins are converted into local currency, or when they are used for domestic financial transactions.

      Not all BitCoin exchanges are under Indian government jurisdiction.
      What's to stop someone from getting rupees from an exchange in China, or Russia, etc?

      And you're still trying to apply a geographical identity to something on the Internet.

      What makes a BitCoin transaction a "domestic financial transaction"? The nationality of the people? Whether the goods/services were rendered on Indian soil? Where the wallets are located in meatspace? None of these are things that can be easily tracked by the government because, like cash, they aren't really assigned to a specific person in any government ledger. If Bitcoin was so easy to track and maintain an ownership record on, you wouldn't hear these stories about people losing large amounts of Bitcoin when they "accidentally throw out a hard drive". It's like the difference between losing your wallet with your debit card and losing a wallet full of cash. One is just an access method for electronic records of wealth with your name and other identifying information assigned to them. Bitcoin is more like losing the actual bills because the private key is just a string you literally hold.

      In both case, regulation can uncover actor's identity and force cooperation with the tax administration. In such a situation, you can still remain anonymous and dodge tax for foreign income that is spend outside of the country, but I guess that is not the biggest concern for the government.

      The biggest concern for the Indian government is the huge swath of people who appear to be earning no income on paper, and yet still manage to function and keep food on the table. Those people aren't likely to be messing with virtual currencies.

  22. Re:That's the best reason to buy bitcoin by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Requirements for banks to report questionable transactions became a lot more serious _after_ the change to Euro was completed.

    That's bollocks. I was living in France when it happened and there were strict limits on changing Francs to Euro well in advance of the actual switch; they knew there was plenty of money stuffed in mattresses & teapots.

    It caused a short term boost to home renovation & antiques market.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  23. Re:I guess there is demand by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    > All money is fake by definition.

    That's partially incorrect.

    * Hard currencies have an intrinsic value. i.e. Especially the metals.
    * Soft currencies -- you are correct -- they are completely artificial.

    However, this isn't telling the entire picture.

    There are 4 Levels of money. That is, money can represent 4 different things:

    1. Barter

    If you have physical good I desire, and vice versa, we can trade. The *thing itself* is money -- ANYTHING can have value -- depending on who wants it. Now this becomes impractical when you only want 1/2 a cow -- thus a solution was needed for this problem. Which leads me to my next point:

    2. Tokens

    Instead of trading the physical things themselves, we can trade tokens which represent them. The nice thing is that we can sub-divide tokens into any division we want.

    3. Time, Effort, and Skill

    I don't have the skills to build a house, nor the time, but if I have enough tokens, I can hire people who do. As a result we've started to ditch using physical tokens and moved to digital tokens, aka bits to represent money. For the time being banks will honor this Bits <--> Paper money equivalency.

    4. Energy

    At the end of the day, currency is really about energy. Hell, Bitcoin mining shows _exactly_ this. We can currently, very primitively, convert matter into energy and vice versa. This will play an ever increasing role as our technology moves beyond the primitive level we have.

    ZPE (Zero Point Energy) will free us from the greed of currency, and move the value into what people can create uniquely. But hat is still a few decades off before we evolve to that level.

  24. Re:I guess there is demand by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

    > All money is fake by definition. That's partially incorrect. * Hard currencies have an intrinsic value. i.e. Especially the metals.

    Except in practice this "intrinsic value" is a laughable myth, especially the metals:

    1. Almost all of that "intrinsic" value is due to it being perceived as luxurious. Most people don't even like gold-colored jewelry; so-called "white gold" (i.e. gold that's been adulterated with other metals to hide its real color) is more popular. How is the totally psychological value of "I feel teh warm fuzzies because this ring is REAL!" any more "inherent" than the warm fuzzies you get from knowing you have 20 $100 bills in your pocket?

    2. Excepting supply issues, whenever gold skyrockets (usually dragging the other precious metals with it, although they don't always rise as dramatically), it's when all non-precious metals are crashing in value... the same fears that cause people to suspect copper will be worth less tomorrow also cause them to think gold will be worth more. Thus, it should be clear that gold's value as currency is definitely not rooted in its practical or intrinsic worth.


    All currencies will take on "artificial" qualities once they become widely accepted as a currency, or even if they are merely thought to be an emergency currency that almost no one currently accepts (gold).