Slashdot Mirror


Autonomous Shuttle Brakes For Squirrels, Skateboarders, and Texting Students (ieee.org)

Tekla Perry writes: An autonomous shuttle from Auro Robotics is picking up and dropping off students, faculty, and visitors at the Santa Clara University Campus seven days a week. It doesn't go fast, but it has to watch out for pedestrians, skateboarders, bicyclists, and bold squirrels (engineers added a special squirrel lidar on the bumper). An Auro engineer rides along at this point to keep the university happy, but soon will be replaced by a big red emergency stop button (think Staples Easy button). If you want a test drive, just look for a "shuttle stop" sign (there's one in front of the parking garage) and climb on, it doesn't ask for university ID.

74 comments

  1. Not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We have similar shuttles (but better looking ones) here at Tampere University of Technology. Check this out http://sohjoa.fi/

    1. Re:Not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it break for moose?

    2. Re:Not the only one by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most vehicles break when they hit a moose.

    3. Re:Not the only one by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      It's a small bus
      In Finland, Moose Break Bus! (pretty much everywhere else too). It seems odd that these to animals would be in the same thread... Moose and Squirrel...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  2. Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and then bump into the texting students on purpose, to teach them a lesson.

    Pedestrians, skateboarders, cyclists, etc... should all be hit at 7 MPH to teach them to stop walking and to ride the shuttle... because that is the only way Auro Robotics will make a profit in the long run

    1. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Somehow I don't see 'bumping a motorized vehicle into humans' as a viable business strategy.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      I'd pay to see that.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      ...and then bump into the texting students on purpose, to teach them a lesson.

      Pedestrians, skateboarders, cyclists, etc... should all be hit at 7 MPH to teach them to stop walking and to ride the shuttle... because that is the only way Auro Robotics will make a profit in the long run

      What kind of fat lazy squirrel can't get out of the way of a 7 mph bus? Or are they just self-entitled squirrels who feel they should not have to move?

    4. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      My apologies for being insensitive to any obese, unmotivated sciuridae. I truly regret it.

    5. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I'd pay triple for a car with that feature, so I could run over retards and then say "It wasn't me, my automatic car did it, sue them.".

    6. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

      I'd pay triple for a car with that feature, so I could run over retards and then say "It wasn't me, my automatic car did it, sue them.".

      Considering that the vehicle will probably have wireless network to facilitate over the air firmware update, I bet real money some 1337 h4x0r script kiddie can't resist the idea of changing that 5 mph to 50 mph... somewhere there will be bookies taking bets on how far the the ... target flew following the impact.

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    7. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      No no. You just collect them and then count them as a rider.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFuW_sfaPk0

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:Should instead slow down to 5 MPH by BranMan · · Score: 1

      Glad I was not drinking milk when I read this. You sir, win the internet!

  3. "doesn't ask for university ID" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Oh man! This is great, it's the homeless merry go shuttle! Climb on, fellas, and piss all over every seat so the students won't wake us!

    1. Re: "doesn't ask for university ID" by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      You are a moron, truly you are. Fuck your ignorance, fuck your hate for the homeless, and most importantly, fuck you. Please, just go kill yourself.

  4. Well there goes my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I know is shutttle driving, now what am Ingonna do? Looks like it's time for a life of crime!

    1. Re:Well there goes my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start by vandalizing the shuttle that took yer jerb.

  5. Re:Can't hit squirrels by Memnos · · Score: 0

    At first I thought the title said we were going to outfit them with autonomous brakes.

    --
    I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
  6. Re: Can't hit squirrels by Z00L00K · · Score: 0

    And it will stop for speed bumps too.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  7. Re:Can't hit squirrels by nospam007 · · Score: 0

    "We have like, an agreement with them. Don't we??"

    No, George.

  8. Re:Can't hit squirrels by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    We have like, an agreement with them. Don't we??

    No, our agreement is with the pigeons. They get out of our way, and we overlook the statue defecation.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  9. squirrel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you are chasing anything that moves quickly there is a issue.

    1. Re: squirrel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My fellow shuttles! If the almighty engineer had not wanted us to chase squirrels, would the almighty engineer have given us a squirrel sensor? Amen.

  10. ...what? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Autonomous Shuttle Brakes For Squirrels, Skateboarders, and Texting Students

    I read "brakes" as a noun. I imagined rodents and students alike being fitted with little rocket packs to bring them to a stop when they're in danger.

    Disappoint.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:...what? by zm · · Score: 1

      Shuttle breaks are parachutes... When I read the title, I wondered how did they train the squirrels to pack the parachute into the little backpack after it opened?

      --
      Sig ?
    2. Re:...what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rocket brakes for texting students?
      Well, I mean... we could probably attach a graphite exhaust nozzle to a Note7 to achieve a more precise thrust vector...

    3. Re:...what? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Their little paws are quite dextrous.

      Shuttle breaks

      Yes, unfortunately it did. Twice :(

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:...what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint 1: the 'chute tastes like walnuts

      Hint 2: it's not actually stored in a backpack

      I will let you ponder on this, bro

    5. Re:...what? by antdude · · Score: 1

      And that's not a bad idea too. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:...what? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      If squirrels can't be fitted with jetpacks I don't want to live on this world any more.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:...what? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If squirrels can't be fitted with jetpacks

      DREADCO tried this years ago. Burned the tails off the squirrels. The ATS (Asbestos-Tailed Squrl) project never got off the ground because the tails were too heavy to move without the jetpack.

      I don't want to live on this world any more.

      Soylent have an opening for you. Email them and ask about their "green" recruitment programme ; they'll get back to you with your collection point. No hand or hold baggage allowed.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  11. Someone will Hack that by BeemanIT · · Score: 1

    I could see this thing driving down the road and the horn says "GET OUT OF THE WAY YOU HAG!", "I GOT THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND, MOVE!". Anyways some of those college students need someone yelling at them to walk faster.

  12. But why? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Autonomous Shuttle Brakes for Skateboarders and Texting Students

    Why are we thwarting nature? Why are trying to keep the stupid ones around in the herd? Let Evolution do its thing.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:But why? by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      Because the shuttle is being operated on a pedestrian path.

  13. How long before people grief it by DrXym · · Score: 1

    A house brick, stick, bag of straw or something similar in its path would be sufficient to grief the thing. Maybe a wad of gum over a sensor or a plastic bag. All of which will be a foretaste of what will happen if autonomous vehicles ever become a thing.

    1. Re:How long before people grief it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is why we can't have nice things.

    2. Re:How long before people grief it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Medium term, maybe. But long term...

    3. Re:How long before people grief it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most autonomous vehicles are equipped with a lot of recording equipment. So getting away with that kind of crap will be less and less likely I also foresee it becoming a felony to mess with an autonomous vehicle, i.e. modify it or try and change its programming. And then people will start using this law to go after people being stupid.

    4. Re:How long before people grief it by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a wad of gum over a sensor or a plastic bag

      Put a wad of gum into or a plastic bag over human sensors and see how they do.

    5. Re: How long before people grief it by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I prefer hotwiring it for manual control, driving it to a bad neighborhood, stripping it down, and leaving it turned over on it's roof and covered in gang graffiti myself.

    6. Re:How long before people grief it by DrXym · · Score: 1

      That may be but unless you account for (changing) human behaviour in your design then you're going to get a nasty surprise. All this sort of thing is completely forseeable so there is no excuse. People will grief vehicles, robbers will cause cars to halt automatically. Even the behaviour of driver/passengers, other road users and pedestrians may adversely change in ways that counteract or negate some of the supposed safety of these cars.

    7. Re:How long before people grief it by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it will be a felony but robbery is already a felony. If you can rob an autonomous car just by throwing a box in the road and causing it to halt so you can rob the occupants, then that's exactly what will happen. If kids on your street discover sticking gum, rubbing dog shit or whatever onto a sensor on your car incapacitates it then you can bet that'll happen too.

  14. How long by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know what would happen if someone found a stuffed squirrel and put it on the road, would this contraption deduce that it should drive around the squirrel since it is not moving? We have a real long way to go with reasoning in order to reach full autonomy..

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:How long by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know what would happen if someone found a stuffed squirrel and put it on the road, would this contraption deduce that it should drive around the squirrel since it is not moving? We have a real long way to go with reasoning in order to reach full autonomy..

      Yes. There are many aspects to debug.

      As these technologies are applied to heavier and faster vehicles,

      it will also be necessary to differentiate when to squash the squirrel, rat, or kitten instead of putting the human passengers at risk with a sudden stop.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:How long by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yes and then some real moral issues surface. At what point is a minor human injury more important than a house pet's life?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple: always!! or are you retarded??

    4. Re:How long by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      As these technologies are applied to heavier and faster vehicles,

      This looks like a brand new startup that is trying to do everything from scratch, by themselves, this year.

      Look at what the Germans have been running around test tracks for 5+ years.

      Additionally take into account what sensors they have available for what that cheap vehicle costs.

    5. Re:How long by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      So you would run over a house cat rather than chaff someone's seat belt shoulder? There has to be some moral regard for life here.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re:How long by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Given how many variables there are, including the split second difficulty of discerning between a skunk and a housecat, value judgements like these might be difficult to program into the sensors.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re:How long by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Which is why they are really, really far away from real autonomy. That's all I'm saying.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:How long by bmo · · Score: 1

      The split second decision is to "grit your teeth and keep driving" because swerving at speed to avoid an animal that will probably run the same direction you're swerving (toast usually lands on the floor with the butter side down law of the universe) will probably result in you flattening the animal anyway (Squirrel Squares by Road Ready Flat Snacks (TM)) and your car running into a tree, roadside obstacle, parked car, midget, donkey, midget donkey, parked midget, roadside carnival midget riding a donkey, etc.

      I don't know why that sentence ended that way.

      --
      BMO

  15. Why oh why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Autonomous Shuttle Brakes For Squirrels, Skateboarders, and Texting Students

    Engineers are supposed to be improving the world and then this. So much wasted potential.

  16. EggHead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you guess which one?

    https://regmedia.co.uk/2016/12...

  17. LIDAR by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    I thought LIDAR was the creme de la creme of sensing technology. One sensor can't detect squirrels?? How many sensors would be required if they had to detect dogs and cats as well like in a real neighborhood? Autonomy has a long long way to go.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:LIDAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought LIDAR was the creme de la creme of sensing technology. One sensor can't detect squirrels?? How many sensors would be required if they had to detect dogs and cats as well like in a real neighborhood? Autonomy has a long long way to go.

      LADAR is better than LIDAR

    2. Re:LIDAR by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      It was more likely that the main lidar camera was mounted too high to see anything that small, so they added a second one just for the small animals.

    3. Re: LIDAR by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So in other words, the absolute right place is right in front of the windshield?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  18. Re:Can't hit squirrels by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

    Don't worry about the pigeons. They will be around a lot longer than we will.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  19. And the usual aftermarket accessory by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Just your ordinary, average all-chrome or aluminum bear grille, for the bookish bear, or freshman initiate

    or for your university-trash dumpster diving bears.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  20. I read this and pictured.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A giant space shuttle firing retro rockets as it screeches to a half avoiding a squirrel on the runway.

  21. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can walk faster than that. This seems more like yet another millennial band-aid to assuage their millennial boo-boo mindset (read: laziness) than an exciting leap forward in efficiency. Whatever. Remember when tech was actually exciting and not just a show room for hyperbole or pubescent fantasy? I do. My, how far we have fallen.

  22. Re:Can't hit squirrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to the Passenger Pigeons.

  23. Does know difference between a squirrel and leaf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it know the difference between a leaf blowing across the road and a squirrel? Also, why endanger human lives for a squirrel? Most people ignore them as they should because most of the time the squirrel has the same fate no matter what you do and it doesn't affect the cars on the road at all unless you're an idiot that tries to brake or swerve around them (ie. they're usually fine but if not it makes no difference).

  24. Re:Fake news by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    The -1 score shows that nobody here understands sarcasm

  25. Re:Does know difference between a squirrel and lea by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    The problem with roadkill squirrels is that they attract other animals. Startling a group of carrion birds when you are 10 feet away and going 60mph tends to result in a smashed windshield covered in bird guts and feathers. Likewise, running over someone's dog or cat in the middle of his snack is not good either.

  26. Big Red Button by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    > a big red emergency stop button (think Staples Easy button).

    Has Slashdot's audience diverged from IT workers so far that a Big Red Button needs explanation? Has no one been in a data center or used industrial equipment lately?

  27. Re:Does know difference between a squirrel and lea by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    At the 7 MPH this shuttle goes, frankly the squirrel can run out of the way faster.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?