Slashdot Mirror


The DEA Has Been Secretly Paying Transport Employees To Search Travelers' Bags (economist.com)

There's a new reason you can be stopped by airport security: because the security officer who flagged you "was being secretly paid by the government...to uncover evidence of drug smuggling." schwit1 quotes The Economist: For years, officials from the Department of Justice testified, the DEA has paid millions of dollars to a variety of confidential sources to provide tips on travellers who may be transporting drugs or large sums of money. Those sources include staff at airlines, Amtrak, parcel services and even the Transportation Safety Administration...

According to [a DOJ] report, airline employees and other informers had an incentive to search more travellers' bags, since they received payment whenever their actions resulted in DEA seizures of cash or contraband. The best-compensated of these appears to have been a parcel company employee who received more than $1 million from the DEA over five years. One airline worker, meanwhile, received $617,676 from 2012 to 2015 for tips that led to confiscations. But the DEA itself profited much more from the program. That well-paid informant got only about 12% of the amount the agency seized as a result of the his tips.

The DEA had paid out $237 million to over 9,000 informants over five years towards the end of 2015, according to the report. The Economist writes that "travelers no doubt paid the price in increased searches," adding that the resulting searches were all probably illegal.

9 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Bush's fault! by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thanks Trump!

    Don't forget Bush! Obama inherited DEA from his predecessor, didn't he? 8 years of Presidency is not enough to fix a federal law-enforcement agency, especially if you pick Attorney Generals for their Social Justice credentials, rather than the ability to run a sizeable organization. (An ability, Obama himself never had either.)

    And, unlike closing Guantanamo, Obama never even promised to reign-in the Drug Enforcement Administration — so we can't hold him responsible for its abuses, can we?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re: Bush's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm thinking Trump will start taking responsibility sometime around Jan 20, 2017, but that's just a guess.

    2. Re:Bush's fault! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Either way, the government sure goes out of its way to make sure people don't get high.

      But at the end of the day, we all have our poisons. A college student has their weed, a business exec has their coke, a trailer park resident has their meth, and a hippie has their LSD. I of course, am a gamer, so my poison is sugary sodas. I got off of it for a while and thought my addiction was gone, but then I started using again recently, and strangely the DEA doesn't mind in my case.

    3. Re: Bush's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The USA is not even close to being under a socialist regime, but it does have an under-educated electorate that easily succumbs to demagoguery. Case in point, you believe you're under a socialist regime. If you did have a socialist regime, you'd have single-payer health care, affordable higher education, equal distribution of education funding for K-12 (instead of kids getting funded based on the property taxes of the area they live in), and social welfare entirely in cash (instead of stripping away people's dignity with food stamps). And you wouldn't have people starving. What you do have is a vastly out of hand military industrial complex, rampant cronyism in all levels of government, a media that reports nonsense in the pursuit of profit, and a lower and middle class that vote against their own interests on the off chance they'll someday be in the upper class and get to stick it to people just like themselves. These are the reasons you have such wasteful big government, and these issues all stem from deifying capitalism, not socialism.

    4. Re:Bush's fault! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, unlike closing Guantanamo, Obama never even...

      Turns out the president can't rule by fiat. Now remind me who blocked him from closing down gitmo...

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re: Bush's fault! by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is the way it works. Except Obama didn't really do that. He just went about getting the economy working again and getting people back to work...faster than Romney said he could do it.

      Oh and with no help, at all, from the GOP and even them actively working against the countries interests so as to not look like they were 'helping' Obama.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  2. Re: I guess I know where all those DEA Profits wil by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not illegal to take money to do searches.

    It makes them an agent of law enforcement, hence having to abide by the 4th amendment. Therefore the searches become illegal..

    This is unlike where if I violate your privacy and go to the cops. Cause if they never asked me to do it, I'm just a tipster.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  3. HGere's a crazy idea by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Informative

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  4. Easy peasy ... by BenBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Report 12323a: "Instead of personal effects, luggage contained bobcat. Would not inform again ...