Slashdot Mirror


India Just Flew Past Us In the Race To E-Cash (backchannel.com)

New submitter mirandakatz writes: Since India's prime minister banned 86 percent of the rupee notes in circulation last month, citizens have been waiting in hours-long lines for ATMs. But these circumstances have also created an unexpected progression: a burgeoning cashless economy. At Backchannel, Lauren Razavi explores how India is now beating many Western countries in adopting mobile payments, and how demonetization has triggered a radical shift toward reimagining India's enormous informal economy as a data-driven digital marketplace. From the report: "Before last month, Paytm, a mobile app that allows users to pay for everything from pizza to utility bills, saw steady business -- it was processing between 2.5 and 3 million transactions a day. Now, usage of the app has close to doubled. 6 million transactions a day is common; 5 million is considered a bad day. Rather than being forced to idle away time in excruciatingly long lines, 'people are proactively exploring other ways to settle payments besides cash,' says Deepak Abbot, senior vice president at Paytm. 'Now people are realizing they don't need to really line up, because merchants are starting to accept other forms of payment.' All of this has created a newfound system that practically incentives mobile payment. With so many people queuing up at banks every day -- and a lot of Indian bureaucracy to wade through in order to open a traditional bank account or line of credit -- the appeal of more convenient digital alternatives is easy to understand. According to a report in the Hindu Business Line, as many as 233 million unbanked people in India are skipping plastic and moving straight to digital transactions. 'Cash has lost its credibility and payments are no longer perceived in the same way,' says Upasana Taku, the cofounder of Indian mobile wallet company MobiKwik, which reported a 40 percent increase in downloads and a 7,000 percent increase in bank transfers since demonetization. 'There's chaos at the moment but also relief that India will now be an improved economy,' she says."

20 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. What's the rush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's a race I don't want to win.

    1. Re:What's the rush? by techvet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Completely agreed. Elimination of cash means the government knows everything you are doing.

    2. Re:What's the rush? by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any cashless payment platform leaves an audit trail. Even bitcoin. So not sure what you are talking about.

    3. Re:What's the rush? by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Completely agreed. Elimination of cash means the government knows everything you are doing.

      Exactly, I enjoy having and spending cash.

      It is largely anonymous, and I find that if I take out my spending money and see myself spending cash and the amount dwindling away off my money clip...it means more to me.

      Credit cards and the like, abstract money like chips in a casino do...and I don't find myself fretting over spending nearly as much when money is abstracted in this manner.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:What's the rush? by DRJlaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's ridiculous on its face. Counter-example: I give you an ounce of gold and you give me a laptop. Extend that example to any comparable cashless payment platform.

      Ah, youngsters.., they forget that an ounce of gold was cash, for example, classic US "double eagle" coins prior to 1933.

      Hint: cash is any material object commonly used to exchange value, as distinguished from use for barter between individuals seeking specific items.

      "Cashless" is any electronically-based payment system relying upon an exchange of information -- rather than material obects -- and requiring three parties, such as a buyer, a seller, and a payment system. Bitcoin's third party is those maintaining the blockchain.

      That three party system invevitably extends to include the government, which will demand things like "complete user security settings and history (including confirmed devices and account activity)." Presuming that the information is not public to begin with, as in the bitcoin blockchain.

    5. Re:What's the rush? by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Elimination of cash means that VISA and MASTERCARD know everything you're doing, and take 2% off the top of every transaction.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:What's the rush? by bayankaran · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cashless transactions in India became widespread when a rice distribution scheme was replaced by direct payments to debit cards issued to the poor. Under the old system, about 80% of the rice was stolen before it reached the final recipients. Compared to that, 2% is nothing.

      What utter nonsense!!! I am from India, and I follow what's happening in the country.

      You are talking about PDS - Public Distribution System, a version of the food stamp program in US. Yes, there are inadequacies and some level of pilferage, but not like what you describe. PDS is not only rice, its wheat, sugar, pulses, and kerosene.

      Less than 60% of the populace of the country has a bank account, that too most of the accounts are dormant. Forget about credit/debit cards.

      The current demonetization is the stupidest idea any Indian government has done in the last fifty years. First they claimed it was to uncover black money, then it was "terrorists", and now "digital India".

      You are either trolling or talking out of your backside.

      --
      Tat Tvam Asi
  2. Banning cash is bad news by cfalcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The summary makes it sound like losing access to cash is a good thing, as long as it can be replaced by a number on a server in all cases. It is not.

    1. Re:Banning cash is bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You know, India and Venezuela are the examples here. Neither of those is a "good place" to live. In fact, one is a Commie hellhole while the other is a literal shithole.

      Maybe the rest of the world should look at this in that context and realize that going cashless is a bad fucking idea that only someone in a bad fucking place would ever conceive of.

  3. "Us" by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who's "Us"?

  4. Re:race FROM e-cash by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Note that the socialist utopias are moving to e-cash.

    I'll keep my dollars, thanks. No need to bother the tax man every time I buy something from a local vendor.

    As long as you didn't drive to said vendor on a government-funded road under government-funded street lights using gas that was purchased from a government-inspected pump (so as to make sure that you pay for a gallon and get a gallon) then sure. Don't bother paying the same sales taxes that the rest of us pay.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  5. This was a good thing? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If someone wants to convert more than 250,000 rupees — roughly $3,650 — they’re required by law to provide an explanation for why they have so much cash and prove that they’ve paid tax on it. If they don’t, they’re expected to pay a fine of 200 percent of the tax they owe.

    Sounds like a horrible thing.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  6. This probably won't end well by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because computer security and how it seems to universally suck.

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  7. What race? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It's not a race, it's a tool that's useful for certain economies and not others.

    In India, 9 out of 10 transactions are conducted in cash. The informal economy is enormous in India, and is an economy that the government has little oversight over, and thus has little ability to collect taxes. E-Cash enables all transactions to be logged, tracked, and mined for data, which gives the government greater control over their economy.

    This is about the Indian government being able to collect taxes better, pure and simple. It also helps reduce corruption and illegal transactions which is a good thing, but the main focus is taxes.

  8. What? by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who the fuck is "racing to e-cash"?

    "Cash has lost its credibility"
    To whom? Bureaucrats? Banks? The NSA?

    This sounds very much like that contrived "Internet of Things" we're supposed to all need.

    --
    -Styopa
  9. The rest of the story by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    India has devalued its largest denomination bills by surprise, in an attempt to get folks in the "black economy", and this even means professionals like doctors, to account for their cash and stop avoiding taxes. Everyone has a very short time to deposit the old bills in a bank, or lose their value.

    The problem with this is that because it was a surprise, India did not print new bills first, and does not have the capacity to print them at anything near the number required.

    So, right now many businesses are shut down because they can't pay their employees. It seems that it was the case that these employees were paid in cash and might not be able to get bank accounts.

    Their economy is going to take a hit.

    1. Re:The rest of the story by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Their economy is going to take a hit.

      It definitely will. But I'm not sure there was any other way around it.

      India's corruption is legendary. You all but have to buy houses and other real estate on the black market, because the seller doesn't want to pay the taxes on a legitimate transaction. Which leads to a status quo of well-off families hoarding cash from illegal deals and essentially never paying taxes. There are other countries that are more corrupt, but these tend to be 3rd-world countries without a functioning government. Of any semi-developed country (or of nuclear powers, for that matter), India's economy is massively corrupt. Something had to be done.

      Replacing bank notes in this fashion is undoubtedly the nuclear option. But the argument is (and I agree) that anything more gradual would have tipped off many people, who would have found ways to convert their cash to other forms in an effort to perpetuate the black economy. India will be in a lot of pain for the short term, but in the long term they will have a much stronger economy with proper funding for public services. They are never going to fully transition to a developed economy (and enjoy the benefits thereof) with that much corruption.

  10. Re:race FROM e-cash by jedidiah · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The dose makes the poison.

    Meanwhile in the real world, it's evil capitalism that gets things done. Before the government can steal something and give it to you, it first has to be invented by someone willing to take risk or built by someone that expects to get paid.

    This includes the machines that paved the road, the street lights, the gas pump, and the gasoline.

    Socialist snow plows are built by capitalists.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  11. Re: Frugal millionaires by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This idea that you can't buy something without the government knowing about it leads to the inevitable you can't buy something without the government approving of it. This fear of not being able to trade freely has been around for a long time. The bible had the mark of the beast.

  12. Different reasoning by s.petry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you don't believe that you are tracked on other purchases you are not doing any homework. Donate to the wrong event or charity and suffer the consequences. Legally you can donate to the Political Party of your choosing, but is that action truly protected. How about donating to the wrong author, artist, public speaker, etc..? Ever see how Professors in Universities get treated when it's revealed that they are Republicans? They may not be fired directly, but you bet your ass that they are censured and ostracized. Plenty of examples for you to find if you look.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.