Slashdot Mirror


Avatar-Style Manned Robot Takes First Steps In South Korea (valuewalk.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from ValueWalk: A robot designed by a veteran of science fiction blockbusters which bear a striking resemblance to the military robots seen in the movie Avatar has taken its first baby steps. The robot standing in a room on the outskirts of Seoul, South Korea stands four meters (13 feet) tall and weighs 1.5 tons. In a Facebook post, designer Vitaly Bulgarov said, "Everything we have been learning so far on this robot can be applied to solve real-world problems." His previous work experience includes work on film series such as Transformers, Terminator and Robocop, reports phys.org. Its creators at the Hankook Mirae Technology, a robotics company in South Korea, claim it is the world's first. About 30 engineers there worked hard conducting initial tests Tuesday afternoon, notes phys.org. For the engineers, it was a challenge to build the giant robot because the unprecedented scale meant they had nothing to refer to. Company chairman Yang Jin-Ho said, "Our robot is the world's first manned bipedal robot and is built to work in extreme hazardous areas where humans cannot go (unprotected)." A pilot sitting inside the robot's torso made some limb movements, and the robot, Method-2, mimicked them with his metal arms, each weighing 130 kilograms (286 pounds). It is so huge that it is twice the size of a tall man, and when it takes a step, the ground shakes with a loud whirring of motors. Method-2 has grabbed the media's attention due to its enormous size, but its creators say that the core achievement of the project is the technology they developed. How the robot will be used is unclear so far, but it is seen more as a test-bed for various technologies that will make it possible for the creators to build robots of any type and size in the future, notes phys.org.

42 comments

  1. Avatar? Seriously? by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try Battletech. Aliens. Titanfall. Starship Troopers (the book).

    1. Re: Avatar? Seriously? by Matt.Battey · · Score: 1

      Hard to see, but maybe the battle exosuits the humans fought the Navi with?

      Anyway, your jobs on danger, cause "Robots".....

    2. Re:Avatar? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts similarly. When I first read the headline, I thought they meant they built one of the smurfs, not a fucking exosuit.

    3. Re: Avatar? Seriously? by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those. Of which original poster cites several examples of prior art.

      I also recall a fictional article in Galaxy SF magazine back in the 1968, "The Warbots", written and illustrated by Larry Todd.

      Here are some of the pix: https://2warpstoneptune.com/20...

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Avatar? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing that came to mind upon seeing this thing is the Fire Moth from BattleTech.

    5. Re: Avatar? Seriously? by Chrontius · · Score: 4, Informative

      As the designer notes in an earlier interview, earlier models had wider hips and a different torso shape, with a more bio-inspired, "automotive" design. Range of motion questions, as well as seasickness caused by the robot's swaying gait, caused them to remodel the joints until the machine's proportions bear an uncanny resemblance to Cameron's AMP suits. The designer of the real one praises Cameron and his team's vision and engineering acumen. While it wasn't designed by looking at Avatar's mecha, it represents a case where there was some convergent evolution during the design process.

  2. I for one welcome our robotic overlords by youn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am not sure what I'd do with one but I want one :p

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    1. Re:I for one welcome our robotic overlords by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm pretty sure of what I'd do with one.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  3. That's nice by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    This is great. It's not like South Korea has some kind of nut job for a northern neighbor who is going to feel even more diminutive now and be likely to nuke them for just having this.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:That's nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better stop any and all intellectual ventures in science and technology.
        "Likely"
      Do you have a personal phone line to their dear leader to confirm that?

    2. Re: That's nice by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Ypu can disregard all the propaganda; the problem isnt NK's primitive, low-yield "fission pops." It's al their goddamn conventional artillery pieces which they've got pointed at Seoul.

    3. Re:That's nice by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      North Korea's leaders have nothing to gain by nuking anyone. If they did, they would be immediately invaded (probably by China, and US), and the leadership killed or imprisoned. It's the threat of nuking people that causes us to pay them off so they'll stop making people nervous.

    4. Re: That's nice by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      1. It is very unlikely that NK has the gunpowder to fire those artillery, as gunpowder becomes useless due to humidity after a time, and it has been a long time since the war.
      2. They know if they use those artillery, they will be instantly crushed by the US and China.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. Robot Fighting by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 2

    Who would win three way fight be between MegaBots Inc's Mk. III, Suidobashi Heavy Industry's KURATAS and this.

    1. Re:Robot Fighting by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      If we can get Honda or Toyota to field a robot - Toyota's iWalk springs to mind as a platform - we would have enough entrants for a straight-up double-elimination tournament. Hell, if they're not too beat-to-hell after two fights, everyone fights everyone and we see which matchups go which ways.

  5. REALLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The robot is a freagin' joke. This is a publicity stunt. The only way this thing works is with the support crane. As is it has absolutely ZERO real world application and even less than zero in a combat situation, short of maybe something in a movie. People have given this **WAY** too much attention. It isn't really even anything new. Why is the world so intent on polishing turds and putting them out on display.

    1. Re:REALLY? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      Bingo. sew up the movie rights. This Thing has Talent!

    2. Re:REALLY? by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      The robot is a freagin' joke. This is a publicity stunt. The only way this thing works is with the support crane

      The cane is obviously there to stop the dam thing crashing to the ground if it over balances for whatever reason. Even Boston Dynamics does that with their prototypes.

      As is it has absolutely ZERO real world application and even less than zero in a combat situation, short of maybe something in a movie.

      We need to come up with the robotic equivalent of

      No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:REALLY? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      It's not supported by a crane, because it's not even real. The video is fake. Just pause the video right at the beginning and you'll see this magical white, oval shape flying in the air above the robot and in front of the cables, like it's supposed to be a part of one of the ceiling-lights and someone deleted the ceiling-light from the 3D-scene before rendering the video, but forgot to also remove its light-source.

    4. Re:REALLY? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      I'm not seeing that. Go full screen and you can see it is link chain, not cable. The part of the chain above the light blocks a view of the upper part of the light fixture, and enough of the light is shining through the chain to mostly wash it out, but it is there. During the first few seconds, the chains swinging makes it a bit hard to focus on, as clean chain is shiny, but you can see the light dimming a bit. At 58 seconds the light fixture comes back into view and it all makes sense.
      YMMV.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    5. Re:REALLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is more than meets the eye.

    6. Re:REALLY? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Walkers are not practical for combat, but there may be a few niches. Cargo handling, for one. Not all cargo comes in convenient containerised forms and with enough space around it for forklifts. Or construction. Or disaster response, excavating collapsed buildings. Basically any time it would be handy for someone to be able to heft half-ton objects around.

    7. Re:REALLY? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      I should point out that this is the prototype for a tracks-and-arms machine intended for ongoing Fukushima clean-up. We can't really ask what they did in Chernobyl - they just sent in unprotected conscripts to clean up - even replace the soviet flag when the radiation bleached it - after which they were either euthanized or tranquilized while the radiation poisoning ran its course. (Though, in the circumstances, it's hard to tell the difference, there) The lucky survived a while without cancer.

      These days, though, we have tungsten, boron nitride, and leaded glass. And now we have something else to carry it for us. Which is good, because if this lights a candle under Cyberdyne's butt, they're likely to actually ship product - someone's likely to ship product - before we next need something like this.

    8. Re:REALLY? by vivian · · Score: 1

      To me the video looks fake because of the humans. movements of the humans look more robotic than the robot - head turns are unnaturally linear and stop abruptly, hand movements are a bit uncanny and everyone is apparently Botox-ed up to the max.

    9. Re:REALLY? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      In Aliens, the boxes the lifters lifted had lifter bars sticking out from the sides like ears. This is just stupid for packing crates together. Oh they could be removable but then you need a thick socket at least, wasting an inch or more of space on each side, and extra time to attach and detach them.

      Stupid all around. Large ones aiding mining and logging might be useful, but that's it. Militarily these are stupid sitting ducks. There's a reason all aliens since War of the Worlds in the 1950s need "force fields" to protect them, because missile tech makes mince meat of any such things.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    10. Re:REALLY? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Those guys right fucking there seem a little too calm for a giant robot right there. Sorry, fake.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  6. MADCAT WHEN? by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
    http://imgur.com/a/a3do8

    1. Re:MADCAT WHEN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Goddamnit, SK keeps AC20ing our legs!"

  7. OMF 2097 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Must_Fall%3A_2097

  8. SUPER FAKE by adjustinthings · · Score: 2

    Wow the lighting effects are bad

  9. Did more research by adjustinthings · · Score: 2

    "The video was posted on social media on Sunday by a 3D modelling designer Vitaly Bulgarov, who is involved in the project."

  10. Little by little.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. AI slowly and obliquely assumes control of all production and provisioning. Soon, entire towns and factories are constructed with no human dwellings, stores, or theaters. Then, enormous sleepless production lines begin churning out hundreds of these babies.

    Weccum to da fyoochum.

  11. so what by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    robots started walking since the late 1950's, and hows that working out for us, now some jackass makes a knock off from a movie that was a knock off of battletech that takes a step while being held in a harness

    clap clap, do something useful!

    1. Re: so what by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      that was a knock off of battletech

      Which was the biggest knock-off of them all.

  12. 13 feet and 1.5 ton ? by testman123 · · Score: 2

    YAPWRMU

    The poster put 1.5 ton (where "ton" aka 1000kg, or 1Mg if you wanna be a core SI nerd ) from the original article but dumped the 4m heigth to replace it with 13 feet.

    WFT

    C'm'on, if you realy want to use units that myanmar, liberia and US only still use as legal : do it. But please do not mix them without clarifying which unit you are refering to.

    As a reminder "ton" is a coloquial term for lots of things :
    - 1,016 kg if in UK and using old mesurements
    - 907kg if in US (and to some extend as a legacy in Canada to)
    - 1000 kg in the SI for the rest of our universe (until proven wrong)

    As the article was using SI units as main unit system only adding some imperial units as explanation for US citizen joes, I was expecting : either a direct quotation with SI units as main and Imperial as explanation (=KISS) or even Imperial as main (long live to the stonecutters, and yes we are on /. dude, I know) and SI as a clarification for the rest of us.

    1. Re:13 feet and 1.5 ton ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we looking at the same summary? What I see on Slashdot right now is just a direct quote from the Valuewalk webpage where they have both 4 meter and 13 feet listed in the body text, just like the Phys.org article. :;confused::

      I agree with everything else you write however :)

  13. Dva? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to make a boatload of money for further funding stick a 19 year old teenage girl in one of those and paint it all pink.

    1. Re: Dva? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, all 19 year olds are teenagers.
      Also, keep in mind this is Korea... so make her 15 and give her a boob job and a microphone.

      Also, this has jack shit to do with Avatar. It's nothing at all like the smurfs, and the exosuits shown in the film were not at all original ideas.

  14. Real-world use still unclear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds about right.

  15. It's all about the power source by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Without the uber power supply, this is nothing more than a marketing stunt.

    1. Re:It's all about the power source by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Hey, the evas in Evangelion seemed to do pretty well with 5-min batteries and huge power cables the rest of the time...

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  16. Stupid size by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it make more sense to make a human sized (or smaller) robot that can walk first, and then scale it up? If human size robots can't reliably stay balanced, why the fuck would I want to crawl inside one that's as big as a school bus?