Slashdot Mirror


Apple Tops Holiday Sales With 44 Percent of All New Device Activations (macrumors.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Mac Rumors: Apple's iPhone and iPad were the most popular mobile devices gifted during the holidays this year, according to new data shared by Yahoo-owned mobile analytics firm Flurry. Flurry examined device activations by manufacturer between 12/19 and 12/25, finding Apple devices to be twice as popular as Samsung devices. 44 percent of all new phone activations were Apple iPhones, while Samsung smartphones accounted for 21 percent of activations. Huawei, LG, Amazon, Oppo, Xiaomi, and Motorola trailed behind with between two and three percent of activations each. Google's Pixel smartphone, which came out in October, did not make Flurry's list. Last year, Flurry released a similar report, and Apple devices made up 49.1 percent of all device activations, while Samsung devices came in at 19.8 percent. Phablets, or smartphones and tablets ranging in size from 5 inches to 6.9 inches, continued to grow in popularity. In 2016, the phablets category, which includes the 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus, 6s Plus, and 7 Plus, was responsible for 37 percent of total device activations. Medium-sized phones, like the 4.7-inch iPhone 6, iPhone 6s, and iPhone 7, were responsible for 45 percent of all activations. Activations of full-sized tablets, like the iPad, have continued to wane. From Flurry's report: "While Samsung is slowly growing in popularity throughout the holiday season, up 1% from last year, Apple devices continue to be the gift to give. Holding the third and fourth positions for activations are Huawei and LG; which is remarkable, as both manufacturers do not have an individual device within the top 35 devices activated. Their high rank is likely due to the fact that they have wide variety of devices and affordable options (hundreds of phablet and medium phones) for consumers to choose from."

13 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. In other words by lucm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The majority of new device activations (roughly 56%) was Android phones.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re: In other words by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      All of those things apply to Android phones as well. Improving your hardware isn't planned obsolescence.

  2. Apple Holiday Sales Share Shrinks by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fixed the headline.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  3. Yes, Apple keeps the profit by lucm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure the Chinese slaves who work in Apple sweatshops for $3/hour will rejoice. It will ensure them many more months of working 64h/week before they earn more than they spend on basic living conditions.

    It would cost $12 per device to Apple if they were to ensure a decent wage to those workers but that would slow down the insane piling of money in Apple offshore accounts so it will never happen.

    Thank you Apple and Apple customers! You all contribute to making the world a better place.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Yes, Apple keeps the profit by lucm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting factoid! Please tell my which brand of cellphone I should buy that is so generous to its laborers, making the most commoditized electronic product in the world?

      According to China Labor Watch, pretty much any brand except for Apple.

      Also if your argument is that smartphones are commoditized, can you explain why you and other fanbois applause and cheer a company that makes $400 per device they sell, while a simple $12 chunk of this profit could make the Chinese workers who do all the work live well?

      Anyone who buys an iPhone is complicit of this outrageous exploitation of human beings.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Yes, Apple keeps the profit by dugancent · · Score: 4, Informative

      Companies that use Foxonn.

      Acer Inc. (Taiwan)
      Amazon.com (United States)
      Apple Inc. (United States)
      BlackBerry Ltd. (Canada)
      Cisco (United States)
      Dell (United States)
      Google (United States)
      Hewlett-Packard (United States)
      Huawei (China)
      InFocus (United States)
      Intel (United States)
      Microsoft (United States)
      Motorola Mobility (United States)
      Nintendo (Japan)
      Nokia (Finland)
      Sony (Japan)
      Toshiba (Japan)
      Vizio (United States)
      Xiaomi (China)

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    3. Re:Yes, Apple keeps the profit by lucm · · Score: 2

      Ok I will have to assume that you don't know how this works.

      It's not a one-size-fits-all situation. First, Foxconn is not the only supplier, there's also Pegatron (who pays the workers on Apple production line even less than Foxconn, an impressive $1.85/hour). Second, the conditions for each production line is not the same. Apple has dedicated plants and they are by far the worst: extreme pressure, poor working conditions, etc. It's well-documented to the point that even poor Chinese workers no longer want to work in those plants, which led Foxconn to implement a new policy: only workers who bring in new recruits are eligible for overtime (which, given the low wages, is vital to pay for basic living conditions).

      You would assume that things have improved since Steve Jobs had them install those safety nets. But here's an interesting story from 4 months ago (Aug 2016) in the WSJ:

      Early one day last week, a 31-year-old man finished his night shift on an iPhone assembly line, climbed to the top floor of Foxconn Technology Group’s L03 production building and leapt to his death. He had been on the job for a month.
      [...]
      [The workers] were especially anxious to learn details of the suicide, which they said occurred during a time of intense pressure on workers as the factory ramps up for iPhone production.

      Now, please provide a list of suicides in Foxconn factories on the production line from any of the companies on your list:
      Acer Inc. (Taiwan)
      Amazon.com (United States)
      Apple Inc. (United States)
      BlackBerry Ltd. (Canada)
      Cisco (United States)
      Dell (United States)
      Google (United States)
      Hewlett-Packard (United States)
      Huawei (China)
      InFocus (United States)
      Intel (United States)
      Microsoft (United States)
      Motorola Mobility (United States)
      Nintendo (Japan)
      Nokia (Finland)
      Sony (Japan)
      Toshiba (Japan)
      Vizio (United States)
      Xiaomi (China)

      Take your time.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:Yes, Apple keeps the profit by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      When you say "according to" you need to supply a citation, not just "google is that way." As far as I can tell, Chinal Labor Watch has stories (they are stories) about lots of different retailers and manufacturers, including both Apple and Samsung. There aren't any real numbers and there are no comparisons. So calling bullshit on your post.

  4. Funny by Trogre · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't recall activating my new Android tablet, whatever that means.

    Where do I sign up?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  5. Samsung is the winner here by lucm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The interesting figure is that Samsung *increased* their new activations, going from 19% to 21%, in the same year that they had to recall every single one of their new phones because they exploded. Meanwhile, Apple activations went down again. I mean, it takes a real optimist to spin that as a win for Apple.

    And it's a long-running trend.

    2014: Apple 51%, Samsung 17%
    2015: Apple 49%, Samsung 19%
    2016: Apple 44%, Samsung 21%

    Now all Samsung has to do is ship a phone that doesn't explode or doesn't catch fire and they'll probably get a tie with Apple within a year or two. All of this after Apple had a complete monopoly in this market just 5 years ago. They'll probably end up in business textbooks as a case study of how companies can go from winners to total obsolescence within a same decade.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Samsung is the winner here by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Possibly. More likely they'll go into a textbook about how shipping few units with a large profit margin is a viable alternative to shipping many units with razor thin margins. Actually, they already have.

  6. Yeah, because I didn't have a fucking choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    We had three iPhone 4S units in the family. All of them started to exhibit battery issues about a month ago. One had a dangerously swollen battery (which, according to Apple, is apparently "normal"). The other two refused to hold a charge. All three devices were happily running iOS 7.1.2.

    We took them into the service centre, and had the batteries replaced for ~$100/pop. They were good solid phones, and in stellar condition for their age, so why should we upgrade?

    Apparently Apple thought otherwise. I wasn't told this beforehand, but apparently "standard procedure" is to upgrade the software on the device prior to installing a new battery. Something about diagnostics- the tech basically said it was bullshit, the diagnostics from the older iOS software was identical to the new diagnostics, except for the version number- which Apple refuses to accept, and therefore will not ship the service centre a replacement battery.

    So we got all three devices back with new batteries... running iOS 9.

    Now they're virtually fucking useless.

    It takes a good 10-20 seconds to open the phone app. I can have exactly one tab open in Safari, switching to any other tab causes that page to reload (which is great for my 3G data plan). Switching to another application causes the new application to re-launch itself (presumably because it got terminated in the background). Switching back to Safari will cause Safari to reload the active page. Before, I used to be able to have 3-4 apps open at the same time (without having them get terminated by the OS) and 4-5 tabs in Safari no problem.

    Likewise, the new OS seems glitchy as fuck. Mail used to work fine with all my business IMAP accounts, now it's a crap shoot if half my inbox even loads (and it's a coin toss as to which half shows up). Even iCloud is a mess, some things are getting synced, others aren't. Almost nothing is working 100%. I've tried doing factory resets and setting up the phone from scratch, but it never makes any difference.

    We've purchased exactly one replacement phone (an iPhone 7). The shit show that came with that (had to upgrade iTunes, except the new version of iTunes required us to upgrade the OS as well, which broke a whole bunch of other stuff)... I don't know.

    We've still got a week to return that phone, and I honestly think we're going to do that and just switch to Android.

    I'm tired of Apple's shit. It's pretty clear that a large part of their business comes from planned obsolescence and forcing people to upgrade, rather then producing products that people actually want to go out and buy. And I've had enough. They can ram their activation and adoption numbers up their ass for all I care.

    1. Re:Yeah, because I didn't have a fucking choice. by antdude · · Score: 2

      This 4S, with iOS v9.3.5, still works even though and unsupported. Its battery hasn't blown up, but its life has shrunk. Pokemon Go + Cellular can drain it in 30 minutes. :( I doubt I will replace its battery since it is old and slow since I got it for free from my king ant who didn't want it anymore.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).