Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Traders Charged With Insider Trading on Hacked Information (usatoday.com)

Chinese traders hacked into the computer systems of U.S. law firms that handle mergers, then used the data for insider trading that generated more than $4 million in illegal profits, federal prosecutors and regulators charged Tuesday. From a report on USA Today: The suspects in the alleged criminal marriage of cyber-hacking and securities fraud targeted at least seven law firms and other entities that handle the sensitive and often lucrative legal work of advising companies pursuing mergers and acquisitions, according to a 13-count superseding indictment unsealed in New York. Operating from April 2014 through late 2015, the alleged scheme ultimately gained access to secret information from two law firms about pending corporate deals, prosecutors charged. The suspects allegedly prized, targeted and gained access to the emails of attorneys directly involved in the deals. Prosecutors charged they exchanged a list of partners who performed such work at one of the firms before hacking into that firm's computer system.

28 comments

  1. Unlike "legal" insider trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Between CEOs and other top executives. They don't get in trouble.

    1. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Worst example is god damn congresscritters, who have specifically exempted themselves.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean CEOs like Martha Stewart?

    3. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Worst example is god damn congresscritters, who have specifically exempted themselves.

      That's no longer true under the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act ("STOCK" Act). It'll be a big headache for the incoming Trump administration.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STOCK_Act

    4. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This only works on extremely obvious insider trading. If you think that insider trading still isn't going on, I have a bridge to sell you.

    5. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Their real screwup was not making 40 Billion instead of 4 million. The latter is so small as to be an accounting error (hence actionable in court); the former gets you a seat in the new Administration.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    6. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its OK because the Pres-Elect wont talk to his kids about his business any more so no need for congressional over reach and rules and such

    7. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by zlives · · Score: 1

      umm 40 billion makes you king of the world.

    8. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they quietly took out all the teeth in that bill:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/17/stock-act-change-insider-trading_n_3100115.html

    9. Re:Unlike "legal" insider trading by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Or after hours trading

  2. BS charges by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Insider trading is about using information others don't have equal access too. Any of us had the very same opportunity to hack these law firms and steal information on their clients.

    Yes I am being sarcastic but only half so, on some level charging them with insider trading does seem a bit like piling on, we ought to be get them for any number of computer crimes and put them away for that.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:BS charges by dave562 · · Score: 1

      My suspicion is that they are piling the charges on in hopes of getting a conviction on at least some of them.

  3. No I haven't read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But were they prosecuted by American or Chinese authorities? I'd say it was a great break through if it they are cooperating on this level

    1. Re:No I haven't read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One was arrested on the 25th in Hong Kong and is awaiting extradition to the US, the other two remain at large.

    2. Re: No I haven't read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In China, deception is considered a sign of good business acumen. It's actually true everywhere else, but a bit less in-your-face.
      These guys got in trouble with China more for being caught, not for the act itself.

    3. Re: No I haven't read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to all those that were deceptive, not caught, and got in trouble.

  4. Don't put PCs with sensitive information by pjv936 · · Score: 2, Informative

    on the internet. PCs are cheap enough that you can create a separate network for sensitive information. My suggestion is a bunch of Linux Xterm or PC terms connected to clustered servers. The system must be totally disconnected from the internet and disconnected from the corporate network.You store money in a vault. You don't just leave it hanging all over the place. And no you can't protected it no matter how good your firewall is.

    1. Re:Don't put PCs with sensitive information by zlives · · Score: 1

      you put the money on the android phone with the bank app, perfectly secure i think.

    2. Re:Don't put PCs with sensitive information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about when you need to share sensitive information? Or when you need information from the internet to create the sensitive information?

  5. anybody wondering if china continues to crack USA? by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Should not be the least bit surprising. What is needed is for America to crack back at CHina.
    I think that O has overall done a decent job, but gads, he assume the best from ppl.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  6. Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't the liberal assholes living on so-called food stamps get off their asses like these enterprising Chinese?

    And no its not illegal nothing in the constitution says so.
    --
    roman_mir

    1. Re:Assholes by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Why can't the conservative assholes living on so-called food stamps get off their asses like these enterprising Chinese?

      FTFY - P.S., Most folks on welfare are white and conservative.

  7. Re:anybody wondering if china continues to crack U by zlives · · Score: 1

    its either that China's security is so much better that 3 letters cant or... that they already do but are better at not getting caught.
    not sure why you got tagged as troll, maybe just that you assume the best from our govt ;)

  8. Legal Tech Security by dave562 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I work in the legal technology field and this is a huge challenge for the industry. There have been warnings going around for the last year about hackers targeting law firms, and those warnings are likely a response to this.

    Law firms are easy targets. Lawyers are full of hubris and not very computer savvy. Law firms are always trying to pinch pennies and IT budgets are often first on the chopping block. Because the firms do not truly understand computers or security, it is difficult to get them to spend the money necessary to secure their networks.

    1. Re:Legal Tech Security by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Maybe the warnings should be FAXed to the law firms, then they'd take this seriously!

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
  9. Re:anybody wondering if china continues to crack U by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Or, attacks on China by the US don't get coverage in the English language press

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.