Slashdot Mirror
US Announces Response To Russian Election Hacking [Update] (reuters.com)
Dustin Volz and Joel Schectman, reporting for Reuters: The Obama administration plans to announce on Thursday a series of retaliatory measures against Russia for hacking into U.S. political institutions and individuals and leaking information in an effort to help President-elect Donald Trump and other Republican candidates, two U.S. officials said on Wednesday. Both officials declined to specify what actions President Barack Obama has approved, but said targeted economic sanctions, indictments, leaking information to embarrass Russian officials or oligarchs, and restrictions on Russian diplomats in the United States are among steps that have been discussed. One decision that has been made, they said, speaking on the condition of anonymity, is to avoid any moves that exceed the Russian election hacking and risk an escalating cyber conflict that could spiral out of control. One example of an excessive step might be interfering with Russian internet messaging. The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency and Office of Director of National Intelligence agree that Russia was behind hacks into Democratic Party organizations and operatives ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election. There is also agreement, according to U.S. officials, that Russia sought to intervene in the election to help Trump, a Republican, defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.Update: Here's the statement by the President of the United States in response to Russian malicious cyber activity and harassment: All Americans should be alarmed by Russia's actions. In October, my Administration publicized our assessment that Russia took actions intended to interfere with the U.S. election process. These data theft and disclosure activities could only have been directed by the highest levels of the Russian government. Moreover, our diplomats have experienced an unacceptable level of harassment in Moscow by Russian security services and police over the last year. Such activities have consequences. Today, I have ordered a number of actions in response. I have issued an executive order that provides additional authority for responding to certain cyber activity that seeks to interfere with or undermine our election processes and institutions, or those of our allies or partners. Using this new authority, I have sanctioned nine entities and individuals: the GRU and the FSB, two Russian intelligence services; four individual officers of the GRU; and three companies that provided material support to the GRU's cyber operations. In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury is designating two Russian individuals for using cyber-enabled means to cause misappropriation of funds and personal identifying information. The State Department is also shutting down two Russian compounds, in Maryland and New York, used by Russian personnel for intelligence-related purposes, and is declaring "persona non grata" 35 Russian intelligence operatives. Finally, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are releasing declassified technical information on Russian civilian and military intelligence service cyber activity, to help network defenders in the United States and abroad identify, detect, and disrupt Russia's global campaign of malicious cyber activities. Editor's note: the story has been updated to include the statement and has also been moved to the top of the front page.
Especially seeing as the way this has been covered 50% of Democrats now think the Russians hacked voting machines
https://today.yougov.com/news/...
Gotta give the DNC credit on this one, they have managed to completely deflect from their security incompetence and breaking faith with their voters.
If Obama is so great, then why did the Democrats lose the White House?
Hillary Clinton
Sorry, Forgot to ask for the source of where you go the names from.
so I searched
James Risch - Idaho (R) - should not be listed
http://www.spokesman.com/blogs...
Dan Coats - Indiana (R)
U.S. Sen. Dan Coats, who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, is following this issue but has no comment at this time, according to spokesman Matt Lahr.
http://howeypolitics.com/Conte...
Marco Rubio - Florida (R)
Susan Collins - Maine (R)
Roy Blunt - Missouri (R)
James Lankford - Oklahoma (R)
Tom Cotton - Arkansas (R)
After searching for mark rubio, I came across this
http://www.usatoday.com/story/...
I think you are taking the Senators who were calling for sanctions over Ukraine and lumping them into the "russia hacked" crowd, which smells a lot like actual "fake news" .
_ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
Answer is it was hacked by at least 5 foreign governments, 2 of which were Germany and China. I hadn't heard the other 3 named.
Oh yea, that is according to the FBI doing the investigation.
Yes because every single US intelligence agency like the CIA is so liberal
They are currently being run by Obama political appointees. You do understand that, right?
You know who else is super liberal: Wikileaks. They confirmed that they got emails from Russian sources.
No, they explicitly said they did NOT get them from the Russians. What's with the phony narrative? How does that help anyone?
Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
The USA and a bunch of other countries imposed strong sanctions on Russia as a result of their aggression in Ukraine. Is that not concrete action?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Socialism (defined as no private ownership of 'means of production') at a national level requires a command economy. No price signals, no profit motive, so no way to make it 'self organizing' like capitalism.
Command economies all have excessive concentration of power. It is just a fact.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
80 millions of dead bodies in the 20th century.
Capitalism didn't slaughter 80 millions people who were "thinking the wrong way".
Russia did a lot more than hack DNC emails. Not that I care one bit about Clinton or DNC, but it is naive to ignore what Putin has been up to and dismiss it as partisan politics. Here's a good article in The Atlantic that provides an overview of Putin's actions. Personally, I had no idea how busy Putin has been in restoring Russia. This is an interesting read.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/12/russia-liberal-democracy/510011/
On the global chessboard, there has been no more deft and brilliant (and of late, lucky) player than Putin. From the early days of his presidency a decade and a half ago, he began to signal that he intended to make Russia great again, and that he saw this imperative as a zero-sum game: As the West gained friendships among post-communist states, Russia lost, and so everything possible had to be done to force Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova, and the Balkan states out of a Western liberal orientation and back into the greater Russian orbit.
those words.
you keep using them.
I don't think they mean what you think they mean.
for example, corruption is the stuff trump is doing RIGHT NOW to enrich himself and his businesses off his newfound position.
The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
Salvadoran Civil War
Time for a US apology to El-Salvador
Revisiting American Involvement in El Salvador: The Massacre at El Mozote
Sorry, but I call BS... unless you had a dramatic change of circumstances. $1,600/month is what you would pay today for a family of 5 (IIRC) in most places, and $450 is about what you pay for an individual.
What a number of people (my employees included) are seeing is that the employer is reducing the amount they pay towards the premiums. We went from 90% down to 80% for employee/40% dependent over the past five or so years in order to keep our contributions essentially flat (2-3% growth). Our employee salaries went up (on average) about 10% per year.
Obamacare is a clusterfuck in many ways, just as the previous system was a clusterfuck. It appears that 20-30% of healthcare costs are linked to the billing/payment process, which is money wasted. While single-payer isn't a panacea (and medicare is a big part of the billing challenges), I have tremendous difficulty in understanding how an improvement can be made without eliminating the insurance companies from the equation.
We need to get costs down to a reasonable level; monthly cost should not be more than 10% of net pay for great coverage or 5% for preventative + catastrophic. It isn't going to happen overnight though, and it will have a negative impact on a lot of companies, people, and industries.
Silly me
Yes.
Let's pick a few. Clinton has been accused of being in favour of off shoring. Trump has actually engaged in offshoring.
Clinton has been accused of being in bed with big business. Trump is a card carrying member of big business.
Clinton has been accused of at best weakly substantiated claims of corruption with the foundation. Trump has been caught using his foundation to pay off personal fines.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
Yes that was the cover story.
Reality was a lot more of a fuckup. One ridiculous example just before the Cuban revolution was part of the CIA running guns to Castro while another was trying to kill him. Another was dropping bombs on a pro-democracy, pro-USA group of US trained army officers in Indonesia that called themselves "the sons of Eisenhower". How socialist do you think they were? When things changed and covert actions halted against them they became part of a military government in Indonesia that was nothing like socialism.