Slashdot Mirror


Razer Built a Laptop With Three Screens Because Why Not? (engadget.com)

At CES in Las Vegas today, Razer unveiled a prototype that could change the way we play. Behold: Project Valerie, the world's first laptop to incorporate three built-in monitors. From a report on Engadget: Each screen measures 17.3 inches with 4K resolution -- that's 12k total (11520 x 2160) viewing space. They slide out from the central lid chassis under their own power and autonomously position themselves to create a full 180-degree viewing area, powered by NVIDIA's Surround View technology, which enables programs to spread a single image across multiple monitors. All of the computer's wiring is internal so you won't have to worry about snagging power cords as the screens deploy. The Valerie also utilizes Razer's short-throw keyboard, an all-aluminum case and the computing prowess of the 17-inch Blade Pro. No word on pricing.

25 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. Why not? by HornWumpus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not?

    3 minute battery life.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:Why not? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Informative

      3 minute battery life.

      They are targeting gamers here (and gamers with too much money, at that). Gamers don't care about battery life as they are going to be plugged in all the time anyways. Gamers that can afford such an absurd setup are probably followed around by butlers who are willing to carry car battery powered UPS units for them if they really want to be "portable". This has very nearly no practical use.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Why not? by secretsquirel · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can carry a power cord much easier than I can two extra monitors.

    3. Re: Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It likely wasn't looks of jealousy, but of derision.

    4. Re: Why not? by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      I will say that an nVidia Shield tablet with bluetooth input devices can do pretty well for internet-based game streaming, and it's a shit-ton cheaper than a born-to-die gaming laptop.

      Yeah, if you like laggy controls and running into bandwidth caps with all that ugly, overcompressed mpeg video, it's just fine. Then there's the fake 'purchasing' akin to 'buying' movies on cable on-demand movies. If your customer is at work, it's likely he doesn't have the bw to run such a thing, certainly without being noticed. Even when things are optimal, game streaming is a laggy, hitchy experience. Inexpensive laptops with low grade geforce gpus give far better results.

      Because of its screens, this machine is interesting if you do dev work remotely as well as game in your off hours. It offers desktop real estate and performance superior to what most employers give local devs, and when it's time to move on to the next burning village, the whole thing packs up neatly into a ~12lb package, perfect for a backpack. If this is your lifestyle, it should fit really well. Clevo-chassis desktop-component 'transportable workstation' options with multiple screens would be interesting as well, but only with beefy gpus and they'd likely be much heavier. Of course, the pricetag is an issue with both.

    5. Re: Why not? by Moheeheeko · · Score: 2

      People still do this? I figured the last 15 years of developers forcing people to be online to play their games, along with a noticeable lack of a LAN option killed off LAN parties a long time ago.

    6. Re:Why not? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Real men don't even know how to pronounce queeshe...quitsh.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Why not? by iamgnat · · Score: 2

      This has very nearly no practical use.

      Really? No practical use?

      I haven't played any games on a computer in probably a decade at this point and I would love to have extra monitors. As it is now I have 3 24" monitors connected to my work laptop (plus it's 15" which I actually don't use) for working from home. When traveling, however, it is painful being reduced to one 15" monitor again.

      Sounds like they have it set up so you can run it with 1, 2, or 3 monitors as needed. So when you are somewhere for a short period (say sitting in the airport) you just have it crank up one, but when you sitting at a remote desk all day you can kick up all 3.

      The downsides for me would be the weight as that thing looks about like a 90s slab of shoulder pain. I also prefer standing my external monitors on end so I can get more code on a single display, but even "shorter" I still wouldn't have to overlap windows nearly as much.

      If they do it correctly where it can actually stand up to some travel I can see it being a big hit for people like me that travel some, but like the extra desktop space.

    8. Re:Why not? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      It will also include a coupon for 6 visits to a chiropractor!

    9. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "we get to watch inflight porn -- on three screens!"

  2. Why not? Ask Lenovo by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    They had a ThinkPad with a second physical screen before, it didn't exactly set the world's collective hearts aflutter. Granted the second one was much smaller than the primary, but they tried it and found it wasn't what the consumers wanted. I don't see why someone would want to commit to a laptop form factor with 3 screens. There are plenty of good reasons to use a laptop - I do the vast overwhelming majority of my own work on a laptop - but this seems like a solution in search of an answer.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  3. Why not? Dinky monitors. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use two extra monitors with my top two laptops, but they are a lot larger than these because I use them when docked at work or home. I wouldn't want two dinky little laptop monitors strapped onto my laptop, not even for free.

  4. Re:Why not? Ask Lenovo by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    I actually use three screens on my desktop. And yes, I do use all three windows. One window has my code, the second the output, the third has e-mail or diagnostic crap up. Useful to see all three at once.

    I hate working from a laptop because of the single screen.

    I suspect Razer don't have the business user in mind though.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  5. 180? Nah by sbrown7792 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    autonomously position themselves to create a full 180-degree viewing area

    Judging by the pictures, where the hell are they getting the 180-degree viewing area from? Are we expected to use the thing with our faces 1mm away from the screen?

    1. Re:180? Nah by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Set them at 60 degrees and get 360.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:180? Nah by skids · · Score: 2

      You just have to do it with your head already in there. And then push real hard.

  6. Because Weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because Why Not?

    Because weight, I imagine. How heavy is this thing?

    Don't get me wrong. I hate this move to anorexic electronics as much as the next person, cutting off hours of battery life, upgradability and replaceability of parts, and very useful peripheral sockets in a desperate attempt to save a couple more grams of weight... but if this thing has three monitors it's got to weigh far more than can be comfortably carried by hand or used in a traditional notebook space. Imagine trying to use it on an airplane.

    Speaking of which... what is the battery life of this thing? It better have an SSD, because otherwise I imagine 5% of its useable battery life would be used up in the computer bootup process alone.

  7. Why not? (Part Deux) Airplanes. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Also, ever try to use a laptop in coach (i.e., "cattle car" or "steerage") on an airplane? There, having enough elbow room for a single small monitor (plus a keyboard + trackpad) is a challenge. I can't imagine what trying to roll out three monitors would be like.

  8. Re:Why not? (Part Deux) Airplanes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now you have a reason to sit in the center seat. Until now most people usually prefer aisle or window.

  9. But how often does it need to be repaired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slide out under their own power? And that's going to last, what, six weeks before it gets stuck? The screen hinge is already a primary point of failure for laptops, let's double the weight load with flimsy motors and rails! Definitely another "more money than sense" moment in computer gaming.
    And a normal keypad would be nice, too. People don't game with those anymore?

  10. And why by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't game on PCs at all, and this totally caught my interest. three, 4k displays? If the CPU/GPU power and RAM and drives are there, all you'd need to carry around to make this a decent setup are a real keyboard and a mouse. I don't give the south end of a northbound rat if it isn't "thin". I don't really care if it's light or quiet, either.

    After Apple's latest fiasco dumbing down their laptops, I'm not feeling all that resistant to going Windows, laptop-wise. My only Apple choice right now is a used machine off of EBay. Something that actually has ESC/F-keys and ports to connect to things. Something even further behind the CPU curve, sigh. Damn you, Apple.

    [runs off to look at specs]

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:And why by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't bother looking for specs - the linked article has a video that is strangely void of anyone using it for anything except showing the Windows desktop. No actual unfolding / sliding, not even tapping on the keyboard or moving a mouse cursor.

      This thing is probably trade show smoke and mirrors.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  11. This is excellent by chrismaffey · · Score: 2
    This machine might be the best thing ever. It is not so much a laptop as a desktop replacement. It is a desktop, that can easily be folded up and moved to another desk without much drama.
    To emphasis this point, here is a list of the bits I need for my current three monitor desktop setup.
    1. 1. Desktop box
    2. 2. 3 x screens
    3. 3. keyboard
    4. 4. mouse
    5. 5. UPS
    6. 6. 4 x IEC power cables
    7. 7. Ethernet cable
    8. 8. 3 x display port cables.
    9. 9. desktop USB hub (cos the main box lives on the floor)
    10. 10. USB cable for hub
    11. 11. power cable for UPS
    12. 12. USB cable for UPS
    13. 13. Tipple monitor stand
    14. 14. keyboard and mouse dongle
    15. 15. Webcam

    If I had a Razer 3 monitor laptop, the sum total of bits would be:

    1. 1. Laptop
    2. 2. Ethernet cable.
    3. 3. Power cable/adapter.

    No need for Cables, stand, UPS, external USB hub etc.
    So please Razer make this bad boy and soon.

  12. Re:Why not? Ask Lenovo by iamgnat · · Score: 2

    Meh. I tried multiple screens. It sucks having to always turn your head back and forth all day long. I prefer one giant screen to multiple tiny ones. Dell U3014 FTW.

    I once ran 4 24" monitors laid out end to end and I hated it both for what you mention and also what I need always seemed to be on the farthest monitor which took "forever" to get to.

    Now, however, I found standing them up in portrait mode is perfect for me since I'm working on code all day and it lets me see even more of it at once. I've also found that 3 seems to be my magic number as that is what I have connected to my laptop, but I have a 4th on my desktop and I find I don't use it much.

    So as others have said, it just depends on what you are doing and how you use them.

  13. Re: Transportable Category: Why not? by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    Plus... if I *really* had to use it on a plane, I could just power it up while closed & have it act like a wi-fi access point, so I can use it via Remote Desktop from my convertible tablet-ultraportable laptop ;-)