Slashdot Mirror


Chile's Goverment Announces Unexplainable 'UFO' Footage (yahoo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Yahoo News:The report from an alleged UFO sighting by the Chilean military over two years ago has just been declassified, leaving experts completely stumped. The Chilean government agency which investigates UFOs, the CEFAA, reports that a naval helicopter was carrying out a routine daylight coastal patrol in November 2014 when the camera operator noticed an unidentified flying object ahead...flying horizontally and at a steady speed similar to that of the helicopter. The mysterious object could be seen with the naked eye but couldn't be detected with the helicopter's radar, ground radar stations or air traffic controllers. Authorities ruled out that it was an aircraft as no craft had been authorized to fly in the area.
In 2014 the CIA admitted their tests of a high-altitude U-2 reconnaissance aircraft between 1954 and 1972 coincided with a spike in UFO reports. Could this be another new military aircraft that's getting its first tests?

124 comments

  1. No, it's definitely a UFO by honestmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Could this be another new military aircraft that's getting its first tests?" Obviously, it's a UFO. No other possible explanation is possible. At last, proof of aliens! Wow! To think, we're alive at such a time.

    --
    Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
    1. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by jargonburn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      ^ This!

      Authorities ruled out that it was an aircraft as no craft had been authorized to fly in the area.

      If no aircraft had been authorized to fly in the area, then it obviously couldn't have been an aircraft!

    2. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unidentified
      Flying
      Object

      Is it identified? No.
      Is it flying? Yes.
      Is it an object? Possibly.

    3. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      It is a UFO until the craft has been identified. After all that's what "UFO" means.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      > Wow! To think, we're alive at such a time.

      Truly, I have waited my entire life to see a small alien craft taking a nice fart through Chilean airspace for some alien reason.

    5. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, obviously it is a UFO because it is unidentified, it is most certainty flying and it is, indeed, an object.

    6. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since when did UFO mean aliens?

    7. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Dutchmaan · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...by the looks of the footage it was definitely of the "silent but deadly" variety....

    8. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by aliquis · · Score: 2
    9. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unidentified
      Flying
      Object

      Is it identified? No.
      Is it flying? Yes.
      Is it an object? Possibly.

      Is it flying? Not necessarily. Just because you can't see the strings, doesn't mean they aren't there.

    10. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A great way to test somebody's intelligence is to ask them what they think about the terms "UFO" and "conspiracy theory".

      Less-intelligent people will usually start talking about "aliens", "ETs", "kooks" and "tinfoil hats", and that's where their understanding ends.

      Smart people will realize that such words also have very reasonable meanings.

      Like in the case of "UFO", as you have pointed out, it just means it's some object flying in the air that cannot currently be identified. Nothing is implied about its origin, its occupants (if there even are any), its purpose, and so on.

      In the case of "conspiracy theory", it just means a theory about a group of people conspiring together to commit some act. Even the official 9/11 story is a conspiracy theory, for example; it's a theory that involves a number of people from the Middle East and other nearby countries conspiring to attack targets in America.

      It's a real shame that the mainstream media and commentators have tried to corrupt the meanings of such terms, and that so many foolish people have fallen for it. They were perfectly good terms to use within rational, evidence-based discussions. But now too many people of a lesser intellect fly off the handle whenever they hear or read them, rendering them almost useless.

    11. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be mounted on a really long stick.

    12. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Thanatiel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The use of the word UFO is implicitly biased.

      Flying implies a "machine" or possibly "creature" (*)
      Object implies "built".

      UAP should be used instead.

      (*) accurate since in fact the first OVNI ever reported was a bird.
      The pilot told about a v-shaped thing that was moving "a bit like a saucer bouncing on water".
      It would have been nothing but a journalist reported it badly (of course) only keeping the movement of the object instead of its shape ...
      This lead to a history of hysterical reports of flying saucers, when instead we should have got a history of hysterical reports of flying v-shaped "bouncing" objects.

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    13. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Thanatiel · · Score: 1

      Are we sure it's an object and not an optical illusion ?

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    14. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, it's a UFO. No other possible explanation is possible. At last, proof of aliens!

      So make up your mind?

      First you claim it's unidentified, and not two sentences later you claim you have identified it as aliens. Which is it?

      Either its unidentified so you can't claim it is aliens (or anything else), or it is identified as aliens and clearly not unidentified.

      The two are mutually exclusive.

    15. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It definitely is a UFO. UFO is not a synonym for "aliens". It is what it says it is: An Unidentified Flying Object.

      Actually, if it later turns out to be a bunch of ETs after all, it's not a UFO anymore, it turns into an extraterrestrial spacecraft...

    16. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Object implies "built".

      No it doesn't. Stop lying.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it is flying?

    18. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      It's more likely not a craft and not flying

      Entirely possible it is an unidentified photoshop image

    19. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      It's not "certainly flying" and there is zero evidence it is even an object.

      I've seen better fakes of Nessie

    20. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once saw a glowing orange object with strange symbols on both sides next to a river in a valley while driving with my parents. But when we moved further along the road, it turned out to be a mobile phone company blimp.

    21. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "If no aircraft had been authorized to fly in the area, then it obviously couldn't have been an aircraft!"

      It's an UFO! It says it right in the name: Unauthorized Flying Object.

    22. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by timholman · · Score: 1

      ...by the looks of the footage it was definitely of the "silent but deadly" variety....

      Obviously it was a group of vacationers from Beta Reticuli illegally dumping the black water tank from their interstellar RV.

      It's the only possible explanation. Anything else is denialism.

    23. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My money's on the fat boys from Gamma Rotundi

    24. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Authorities ruled out that it was an aircraft as no craft had been authorized to fly in the area.

      Other authorities were mystified about burglaries reported in various cities as no burglars had been authorized to burgle in the areas.

    25. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It's safe to assume that a "flying" object isn't necessarily an artifact... unless it keeps flying.

    26. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by hey! · · Score: 1

      Actually if you don't know what you're looking at, you can't really draw any conclusions at all about what it is doing. It might not be flying. It might not even be an object.

      Let's take the "not flying" case. I have personally seen meteors appear to do impossible things -- like falling and then suddenly shooting upwards. But just because an object's angle of elevation above the horizon increases doesn't mean that object is actually increasing altitude. An airplane flying at constant speed and altitude will increase it's angular elevation as it flies overhead -- and will appear to accelerate upward as well. A meteor will do the same even as it is in fact falling, not flying. Add odd air-induced changes in trajectory (think of them as God's knuckle ball), and dramatic turns as parts of the meteor split off, and you get some very (apparently) un-rock like aerial behavior.

      The ultimate example of an unidentified not-flying-object was a news broadcast I saw which showed a telephoto video shot of what it called a UFO: a bright disk of light trailing sparks. I almost fell out of my seat because I instantly recognized the thing as Jupiter with the four Galilean moons lined up to one side.

      The category of "not an object" is extremely broad; basically any visual phenomenon that appears to the observer as above the horizon. This could be refraction phenomena like mirages, or reflections. I think reflections probably explain a lot of the high speed level flight reports, e.g. a pilot sees a reflection on his canopy and thinks it is an object on the horizon; because he thinks the object is far away he interprets its apparent motion against the background as extreme speed, but in fact he's looking at something a few feet away as he's changing heading.

      In this case the fact that the "object" in this particular did not appear on radar suggests to me that it is not an object at all, or if it is an object it is not where it appears to be. It might of course be a stealth aircraft.

      By the way "conspiracy theory" does not mean what you think it means. It refers to a particular social phenomenon in which people believe implausible stories in a way that is impervious to disproof because that belief is emotionally satisfying. Yes, there is a well-supported theory that there was a conspiracy to attack the US on 9/11, but that is not a "conspiracy theory", any more than a mirage is an object, even though we can call it an "unidentified flying object". That's just the way language works, by convention rather than logic. Tacking on an adjective to a noun doesn't always produce a narrower ontological category (e.g. the way "black cats" is subset of "cats"); sometimes it changes the sense of the noun altogether (e.g., a "cat's paw" isn't a kind of "paw", it's a kind of person).

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    27. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong in both cases.

      UFO does mean any unidentified flying object. But it also means an extraterrestrial spacecraft. The abbreviation is used in two meanings. This is called a homonym. It is useful to understand this, so you aren't the guy who always goes into a whiny lecture about the meaning of "UFO".

      A conspiracy theory is *not* any theory about a conspiracy. 9/11 tin foil loonies are trying to push that bullshit idea, but it simply is not what that term means. If I suspect a bunch of kids are thinking of ringing a doorbell and running away, that is not a conspiracy theory. That simply isn't what that term means or how it is used. Only tin foil hatters try to claim that, in order to create legitimacy for their nonsense.

    28. Re:No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These morons seem to forget that UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object. That means it could be a plane, a meteor, a cloud, a balloon, a plastic bag...anything that hasn't yet been identified. Why they leap to the irrational conclusion that it must be aliens or why they continue to call it a UFO is beyond me.

    29. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earlier than that, I think:

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_(TV_series)

      Get off my lawn, etc.

    30. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. "UFO" only means aliens to idiots.

    31. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, an Upward Flagpole Object

    32. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      A great way to test somebody's intelligence is to ask them what they think about the terms "UFO" and "conspiracy theory".

      That sounds more like a great way to test for empathy. I expect those on the autism spectrum to do far better on your test.

      Highly intelligent people will know what UFO stands for, but also understand that the vast majority of the people use the term to refer to aliens. It isn't unreasonable to interpret "do you believe in UFOs?" as "do you believe in aliens?". I usually just try to clarify and ask which definition they are using, but when I'm lazy I'll just go the peanut gallery route.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    33. Re: No, it's definitely a UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not about dictionary definition, this is about human perception.
      In the popular mind, a door, a plane, a hammer ... are objects, a meteor is not. "Object" has this "constructed" image.
      Also, a "thing" doesn't have the same connotation ... but still has the "solid matter" tag.
      That's why in the modern acronym it is replaced by the word "Phenomena" : there is no subconscious label there, no initial bias.

      So you may want to think a bit before writing a lie by calling a statement a lie.

  2. Correlation Does Not Equal Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2014 the CIA admitted their tests of a high-altitude U-2 reconnaissance aircraft between 1954 and 1972 coincided with a spike in UFO reports. Could this be another new military aircraft that's getting its first tests?

    Perhaps the CIA spy-planes, both then and now, were tracking the UFOs from outer space.

    1. Re:Correlation Does Not Equal Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the CIA spy-planes, both then and now, were tracking the UFOs from outer space.

      Or, the UFOs were tracking the CIA planes.

  3. I'm waiting for Wikileaks to weigh in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have my standards after all.

    1. Re:I'm waiting for Wikileaks to weigh in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As opposed to all those 'professional' news outlets fighting the good fight against 'fake' news, right?

  4. Clearly a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The instrument sure shows a lot of English for a Spanish speaking country.

    1. Re:Clearly a fake by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      That is because they purchase most of their military planes and parts and generally do not build them themselves (except one- T-35 PillÃn) . The
      USA manufactures the bulk of them with one version from Spain (the CASA C-212) and one from Canada (the DHC-6 Twin Otter).

      This is not counting the surveillance drone made in Israel (the Hermes 900 Star) or the two trainer aircraft the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano made in Brazil and T-35 PillÃn made in Chili. Although the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano is capable of a light combat role.

      However, even if that wasn't the case, some names, words, or terms used in industry or trade settle on a common name widely in use even though a local language may have a term similar enough to be used in its stead. Suppose there are 20 different terms for altitude and heading, instead of a commercial pilot learning 20 different languages, they just learn what is needed specific to flying like altitude and can understand flight control anywhere in the world even if they couldn't sit next to the guy at a bar and hold a conversation with them without a translator.

  5. What about air polution!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously they are ignoring our emission regulations. I hope they will be identified, caught and charged appropriately.

  6. coal powered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was it coal powered? maybe it's Russian like there aircraft carrier.

  7. Marsh gas by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 1

    Move along now, nothing to see here.

    1. Re:Marsh gas by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      there is obviously something to see, just that nobody identified it (yet) probably some stealth military aircraft = does not show up on radar but you can see it with your eyes

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:Marsh gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is out there

    3. Re:Marsh gas by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 0

      My guess is some type of pesticide being deployed by CIA/DEA drug interdiction aircraft. There's plenty of coca grown in Chile.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    4. Re:Marsh gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pesticide? So that the drugs grow better because all the insects that eat the leaves are now dead?

      I knew the war on drugs was bogus, but I never realised they were assisting in quality control too...

    5. Re:Marsh gas by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      Ah, shit. I meant herbicide of course. Although it's just as possible it's in the CIA's best interest for the crop to do well.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    6. Re: Marsh gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Release water or fertilizer doped with isotopes. Coca from sprayed areas will show higher trace amounts, making it easier to identify trade routes.

    7. Re: Marsh gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is coca grown in chile.

    8. Re: Marsh gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is NO coca grown in chile. The nearest is a thousand miles north of where this was filmed.

    9. Re:Marsh gas by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      +1 for DEA/CIA doing their normal things or unexpected local helicopter having issues.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. The "exhaust" looks like condensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's close to a layer of clouds, so the small changes of pressure or added particles may cause condensation. You know, contrails.

    1. Re: The "exhaust" looks like condensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Chemtrails. You know, like the mind control chemicals that jetliners spray. It's a thing I read about on Alex Jones's site.

  9. Re:What Fucking "Experts" by rochrist · · Score: 1

    Do you people actually read the words in the articles? Cause there aren't that many.

  10. Obviously Russian Hackers are to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, now Russian hackers are targeting the Chilean military emails. Putin is clearly in favor Chilean airspace as Russian airspace.

  11. Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by Xenographic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really? Because there's an airport right there with standard flight route. Feel free to look it up on Planefinder. More info here: https://www.metabunk.org/explanation-for-chilean-navy-ufo-video-aerodynamic-contrail.t8306/

    Slashdot, we really need to have an intervention with all this fake news conspiracy crap. I'm only one person, I don't have time to debunk all this nonsense you keep posting. This used to have some vague relation to tech, rather than every random clickbait article you could find in the firehose.

    What's the next story going to be? That Russian lizard people hacked the Bilderbergs to steal their chemtrail recipes for the alien galactic overlord, Xenu to use in Darl's $699 Linux auditing sessions?

    1. Re: Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This housewife is making experts
      furious with her one simple trick to
      remove fake news from Slashdot!!1!

    2. Re:Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Probably the fact that there is an airport close buy is the reason: why there was no authorized airplane at that place!.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      > there was no authorized airplane at that place!.

      Really? Because flight records put LATAM Chile flight LA330 in the right place at the right time.

      But you won't get anyone to click your news stories by telling people that....

    4. Re:Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      You are bad in reading?

      If that plane was there, they had not claimed there was no authorized plane around.

      If they had figured later they had made an error, and there was an authorized plane around then they had not releases this as "UFO news".

      And regardless what: an unauthorized plane or authorized plane, both would show up on radar! Or respond to radio calls.

      So the question is not rally if LTAM LA330 was the culprit, question is: how can so many things be wrong recorded or wrong reported?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > I'm only one person, I don't have time to debunk all this nonsense you keep posting.

      Feel free to stop.

      You don't know it, because you're actually the conspiracy theorist kook on this site, but most of the fake news comes from you. Like, you know, when you tried to argue the PizzaGate scandal was real and so on, so you'll actually be solving the goal you profess to solve which is good.

      What you're really saying is that you're getting worn out being the only guy willing to prop up fake news and conspiracy theories. That's really not a loss to most of us if you stop that though you know?

      The only people that have killed off the tech angle are people like you that are more interested in implying political opponents are paedophiles than actually having a decent rational discussion. If it upsets you that the site isn't what it used to be then all you have to do is stop being one of the key causes of that.

      We really really don't want you to keep defending fake news and the fact you call this widespread issue a conspiracy theory is astounding. What, you really think all those Moldovan and Macedonian kids who admitted they make a fortune peddling it are CGI or paid to say that or something? If they were then that would in itself mean it was fake news, hence destroying your argument of it being a mere conspiracy theory anyway:

      https://www.ft.com/content/333...

      http://www.b92.net/eng/news/wo...

      http://en.publika.md/moldova-s...

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

      http://www.pri.org/stories/201...

      http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/...

      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11...

      It doesn't matter what media left, or right, or what part of the world you look in - Serb or British, Macedonian or American, the problem is real. The fact you want to pretend fake news isn't real says all that needs to be said about you.

      If you don't have time to keep trying to debunk the truth then you may want to consider that that's because the truth can't be debunked. You're fighting a battle you can't win, because you're fighting a battle against reality purely because you can't accept that you spent the last 6 months of your life riding Slashdot's ass to defend countless fake news stories and peddle them as fact. You were duped by a 16 year old Macedonian kid, so accept it and get the fuck on with your life if you can't cope with the pressure of trying to mask your own failings.

    6. Re:Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by jocarren · · Score: 2

      It's pretty official. We may be an underdeveloped nation, but we can keep track of our airplanes. The chilean army keep track of this things because they are paranoid, they worry the peruvian army might be spying us with some secret russian tech (lol). Chilean an Peruvian military have their own mini cold war going on. This might even be a move to showcase the Chilean Airforce surveilance skills.

    7. Re:Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by Xenographic · · Score: 0

      > question is: how can so many things be wrong recorded or wrong reported?

      Given the state of clickbait journalism, the real question is how we can get real news. It's all fake news.

      I can no longer trust reporters at all. They have zero credibility until proven otherwise. I trust verifiable evidence. Period. I assume that everything is written by someone trying to summarize something in 15 minutes (if that) for maximum clicks. I do not expect fact checking or real journalism of any kind, I expect them to listen to whoever gives them the most interesting story.

      So I don't give a damn what they reported, I care what facts they present that we can check. Literally every other part of their report is ignored.

      Thus, I don't give a damn what they wrote in the article, I care what facts I can verify. And given that we can see a plane in the right place at the right time, that's the only rational explanation until someone provides verifiable facts that say otherwise.

    8. Re:Maybe Slashdot ran out of hot grits... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you are implying I said or believed a lot of things I never did believe. I can only speak for myself, but I don't know a single person who ever read the Macedonian clickbait sites. They make money by being clicked on, not by being believed. Take this very Slashdot story for an example. I certainly clicked on it, but I find it a lot more likely that it's an Airbus 330 on a normal flight path than a UFO. So the only thing that might be proven is that they got a lot of clicks. And they did a shoddy job even of presenting that. Where are the Google trends showing the sites gaining in interest over the election? The Alexa rankings? You know, all the normal things that anyone who knows anything about SEO would even look at? Worse, all the news stories just cite other news stories saying things and add nothing new. Seems to me like they're worried about the Macedonians muscling in on their territory. Just cite this one story that uses the other dozen stories as evidence! Primary sources? Who the hell needs those when I can just link to someone who agrees with me?

      Regarding PizzaGate, I mostly wrote about Podesta, not Alefantis and the worst I accused any of them was of having iffy taste in art. Every statement I made was an opinion based on fully disclosed facts.

      See, I believe in primary sources, not this second hand media laundry crap. And there are poorly explained things in the Podesta emails--who here thinks that it's normal for handkercheifs to have pizza-related maps? Or to ask whether you'd play dominoes better on pizza or pasta? That kind of stuff made people think they were talking in code words, so they went to Urban Dictionary and similar sites and a number of the oddly used words lined up with pedo slang. That doesn't make anyone a pedo, mind you, but that's how that got started. Oh, it's also true that it was later found that Podesta did not attend that one particular spirit cooking event when another email about it was discovered. But that's Podesta. I haven't written much of anything about Alefantis at all, other than to say that the jimmycommet instagram (NSFW) had some strange pictures on it before it got removed.

      However, I have never said anyone there was a pedophile, I disclosed and linked the relevant emails and other facts that formed my opinions, and I never encouraged or supported any kind of violence. And I do condemn every idiot with a gun. Whether it's the idiot who searches a pizza place with a gun, or the idiot who murders a Russian diplomat.

      So in sum, I believe evidence, not "news" sources. Especially given what passes for an investigation these days. I can and will point you to the specific facts I used to form my opinions. If you want to change that, present new facts.

      Look at primary sources, not media BS. Then see how many I have and how many you have. No, I do not believe things because some knob with a journalism degree spent 10 minutes summarizing something and found another journalist who agrees with him to link to.

      So give me your facts, not your opinions, if you want me to believe you. You gave me articles that link to other articles that contain a scant few facts other than the names of a few clickbait sites and no method of corroborating any of them. I gave you the damn flight number and all the information about where this happened and a way to look up that particular flight's route.

      See the difference here?

  12. It's an object? Says who? by munch117 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's not necessarily anything there. It could be a conspicuously shaped gap, forming in the cloud formation.

    That must be why the Chileans are calling it an "unidentified aerial phenomenon", not a UFO.

  13. Re:What Fucking "Experts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably this.

    On IR only the two engines are visible (and the exhaust with hot vapor of unburned fuel).
    The few frames captured in the visible spectrum don't seem to show the aircraft itself, but they are far too blurry to see it anyway.
    Of course all pilots have super-human eyes, but determining the kind of aircraft at that distance isn't easy even for those eyes.
    Not being visible on radar of a normal even military helicopter isn't surprising. Its not built to track down aircraft in any case.

    Just the IR picks it up nicely. It's built to see much more faint things than even the cooled exhaust of stealthy aircraft.

  14. Real UFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can confirm it's a real UFO. The video is blurred beyond recognition, and you can't make out any details.

  15. Chile is interesting by Natales · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It never ceases to amaze me how prevalent and commonly accepted are UFOs in the Chilean collective psyche. You can even do a general search in the news for UFO-related articles and come back with a bunch (in Spanish). In virtually all cases, the generally accepted belief is that they have an extraterrestrial origin.

    An overwhelming 85% of Chileans believe in the phenomenon, compared to a 48% of Americans, and the topic can easily come up in any colloquial conversation among regular people as something totally accepted.

    Coincidentally, Chile is also fertile ground for "spiritual movements" that very regularly include UFO elements. As a Chilean myself, and as someone who was attracted to those movements in my 20s, I struggle to come up with a clear explanation of why Chile in particular seems to be so captivated by beliefs in the supernatural. Michael Shermer does a good job explaining generically why people believe weird things, but doesn't explain why certain specific cultures or countries seem to be more susceptible than others.

    I, for one, believe the reason is the lack of formal teaching of Critical Thinking as a subject, throughout the school curriculum. In the US, critical thinking is virtually part of all subjects in the new Common Core standards, from K to 12. They were even part of the old standards, at least in all science classes. Although things may be different in Chile now (I graduated high school in 85), I don't recall to have ever been taught critical thinking skills. That's something I discovered years later when I moved to the US. That in spite of having gone through a rigorous degree in Computer Science at the University of Santiago. University careers, at least back in my day, were very technical in nature, and focused very narrowly on deep subjects, without concern to create a more rounded individual. That was an exercise left to each student.

    1. Re:Chile is interesting by akozakie · · Score: 1

      UFO = Unidentifed Flying Object. It is an object that flies, but has not been successfully identified. Where does "collective psyche" come into this?

      Ah, you mean aliens. Sorry, but that does not directly follow from the UFO term. So far, UFOs either get identified as something natural or man-made or stay unidentified, which simply means lack of information. You added the aliens to it. It's just your own bias.

    2. Re:Chile is interesting by _xanthus_47 · · Score: 1

      Common Core launched in 2009. Those 18 year olds must be amazing at critical thinking by now. :|

    3. Re:Chile is interesting by _xanthus_47 · · Score: 1

      I rushed in and commented. No way to delete comment now. Deal with it.

    4. Re:Chile is interesting by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I think it's just a lack of debunkers in your area. Korea has the same kind of weird phenomenon, but dealing with fan death. In America, we have the constant worry that the other political party is trying to become a dictatorship.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Chile is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because they're closer to New Swabia.

    6. Re: Chile is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read his comment? It *is* his own bias *as a Chilean*. And he explained that in Chile, UFO *does* connotate aliens. Fuck man.

    7. Re:Chile is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans would never believe in something unexplained and magical that comes from the sky and can't be proven to exist.

      Science, that's why we're NUMBER ONE!

    8. Re:Chile is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      85% of Chileans believe. 48% of Americans believe. So of course they see more in Chile. I hope readers see where I am going with this.

    9. Re:Chile is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An overwhelming 85% of Chileans believe in the phenomenon, compared to a 48% of Americans, and the topic can easily come up in any colloquial conversation among regular people as something totally accepted.

      Which of the following are supported or ruled out by your stats?

      -- Chileans are gullible
      -- extraterrestrials think there's something interesting in Chile
      -- conditions for sighting aircraft are better in Chile
      -- Americans are bad at identifying aircraft

    10. Re:Chile is interesting by whodunit · · Score: 1

      I would contend that this press release by your government is a rationally motivated move enabled by the tolerance and general credulousness of your fellow countrymen vis a vis UFOs, rather than a symptomatic lack of education among your elected leadership. To wit, the most salient line of this article:

      (Note: None of the agencies acknowledged the possibility of an unauthorized airplane in Chilean airspace, a presence that could explain the radio silence, the lack of a clearance for landing, and the possibility of flying low enough to evade radar detection.)

      Spooky unidentified things zooming around controlled national airspace is a security threat - no matter who, or what, is in the cockpit. America has investigated UFOs quite thoroughly as well, but unlike Chile, our agencies consider it a source of embarrassment that shouldn't be made public. Since the Chilean populace is more tolerant of such things, your military is free to publish this most interesting video under the guise of free and open-minded exploration into unexplained phenomena, in the hopes it might encourage their neighbors to keep a keen eye out for further... incursions by these mysterious airspace-transgressing "visitors" - otherworldly, or otherwise.

    11. Re:Chile is interesting by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      You're the one who has to deal with it. Your tendency to post a comment before thinking about what you're writing, that is the "it".

      Or were you aiming for a Frist Proust ?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    12. Re:Chile is interesting by _xanthus_47 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was talking to myself when I said deal with it. You good.

  16. it's probably a gas or alcohol powered drone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    move along

  17. There's a simple explanation... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew a former US Army helicopter pilot. He had great stories about stuff they did. One example: find a car driving down a lonely rural road at night. Approach it with lights off. Settle in at low altitude and fifty yards behind it. Turn on the several-million-candlepower search light, then immediately bank to one side. Turn the light off. Run away. Watch the local papers for UFO sighting reports.

    1. Re:There's a simple explanation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like he was just wasting the money of hardworking American taxpayers.

    2. Re: There's a simple explanation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Taxpayer here! I'm ok with this expenditure.

    3. Re:There's a simple explanation... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't get good at flying low, at night, following a target, in blackout mode unless you do it over and over again. Just standard training flights with a little fun thrown in.

    4. Re:There's a simple explanation... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Obviously the most plausible explanation is a secret military aircraft not known to the public. My speculation is that it is the US military mach 5 capable "Aurora" aircraft. It is rumored that the Aurora uses external combustion.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:There's a simple explanation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is rumored that the Aurora uses external combustion.

      Propelled by setting farts on fire?

    6. Re:There's a simple explanation... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I heard (from a drunk potato-digger in the pub last week - an unimpeachable source) that the KGB got a hack so they can apply a HCF instruction to the Aurora using an NES and 3 miles of barbed-wire.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    7. Re:There's a simple explanation... by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      I heard (from a drunk potato-digger in the pub last week - an unimpeachable source) that the KGB got a hack so they can apply a HCF instruction to the Aurora using an NES and 3 miles of barbed-wire.

      He got it wrong, the 3 miles of barbed wire is for ULF transmissions to nuclear submarines. ;-)

  18. It is the CTer which corrupted the term by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Who corrupted the term ? CTer and later mass media and culture which forever associated it with UFO==alien, when in reality all skeptic usually point out it just means anything you see in the sky which you cannot identify readily. The acronym does not help either (unknown flying object which indicate something flying e.g. which also indicate usually intelligence and direction, rather than unknown floating/falling object or similar which would not indicate necessarily such - especially knowing that most UFO can be analyzed as weather phenomenon , celestial objects or even hoaxed turkey baster hanging on a line). Basically if you want to point the finger , it is not at "less intelligent" person, but CTer and later culture as a whole.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  19. Surprised they didn't find a way to blame Russia by Xenographic · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Is it identified?

    Yes. It appears to match LATAM Chile flight LA330, callsign LXP330, which is an Airbus A320-233.

  20. #fakenews by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's pretty well identified.

    It appears to be LATAM Chile flight LA330.

    And they wonder why nobody trusts the news any more after posting ridiculous nonsense like this...

  21. Swamp gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swamp gas, motherfuckers.

  22. probably like the one I saw by the air base by swschrad · · Score: 1

    foggy night, late night, driving into the city and past the SAC air base on a federal highway. a bluish smear pacing my car, a little ahead, overhead to the left. occasionally blinking regularly. just like a reflection of my headlights onto some new aluminum high-tension wires between the wooden poles.. in fact, exactly that.

    sun reflecting off a helicopter would look just like described....

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  23. UFO =/= Alien Space Ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember kids, when pilots and astronauts say "UFO" they very literally mean that they saw an object flying around that they could not immediately identify. It is not the bastardized definition that the so called ufologists have made it into. An official stating the existence of a UFO is not an admission that a space craft from another planet was seen flying around. You may now put your tin foil hat back on.

    1. Re:UFO =/= Alien Space Ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt we'll be seeing any spacecraft from alien intelligences any time soon. Any race intelligent enough to build one is probably also smart enough to have found out, quite possibly the hard way, that Diversity Is Not Their Strength, and isn't likely going to be going out of it's way to cultivate any. That's only a fantasy of silly human beings, who are decidedly not yet intelligent enough to be building interstellar ships. Which is fortunate for the rest of the galactic neighborhood.

  24. "Authorities rules out the obvious explanation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Authorities ruled out that it was an aircraft as no craft had been authorized to fly in the area. "

    Isn't that the best way to test a new stealth aircraft? If no complaints come in, it works.

  25. Fuzzy video by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Why are all the videos and photos of UFOs always so fuzzy that you can't really tell what it looks like? Seems like a conspiracy to me!

    1. Re:Fuzzy video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are all the videos and photos of UFOs always so fuzzy that you can't really tell what it looks like? Seems like a conspiracy to me!

      Because if the pictures or videos were more clear, the aircraft would be easily identifiable, and IFO's aren't very interesting.

    2. Re:Fuzzy video by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Unless they have little green men piloting them.

      Which never happens.

  26. Re:Surprised they didn't find a way to blame Russi by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

    Unlikely.

    The story clearly says: it was not on ground radar and not on air borne radar.
    And for everyone hunting an UFO it is plain obvious to check flight plans and airports about ... well, airbuses and such.

    Do you really think Chiles authorities are so dumb that they first find an UFO, then need 2 years to find no explanation, then disclose all information and get debunked by a hobbyists web site?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  27. Re:Surprised they didn't find a way to blame Russi by Xenographic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You seem to be assuming that the story is accurate, despite the fact that it offers few details and no primary sources

    I'm not nearly so credulous as to simply believe that journalists would let facts stand in the way of good clickbait. This goes double when someone posts verifiable, factual information that contradicts it.

    Who am I supposed to believe here, a journalist writing UFO clickbait, or people who posted information that can be verified and corroborated from other sources?

  28. Re:Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your support for Trump is inversely proportional to the size of your genitalia.

    Seems reasonable. Doesn't matter how large you were to start, the idea of supporting (or having sex with!) Hillary would shrivel anyone's dick to a frightening degree!

  29. I thought Everyone Knew by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    I thought everyone knew what the real story was. After the Soviet Union fell, some of their KGB documents and defectors showed they used UFO reports in the United States and several other nations to spread distrust of their governments. But wait, as they say on TV, there's more.

    Later FOA requests some few years ago from the CIA and other agencies described how, after the defeat in WW2, the US gained several rocket scientists/engineers, including, famously, Dr. Werner Von Braun. Also imported were several experiment aircraft seized at Pannemunde (not sure of the spelling), including at least one prototype with a circular (saucer-like) wing arrangement. As I am quite an ancient dude (ignore the handle) I remember seeing grainy photos of some of these aircraft, possibly taken by servicemen, which were published in either or both Popular Science or Popular Mechanics magazines. I was just a small kid at the time, so it was probably ca. 1947. These planes, according to the CIA response to the info request, were taken to a testing airbase in the New Mexico desert (think area-51) where they were studied and test-flown, and found to be quite unstable as they were involved in frequent collisions with the ground, causing numerous pilots' deaths. Contemporary reports of these crashes by civilians spread throughout the US, while its government denied the existence of these crashes and the erratic, saucer-shaped craft. It was the Cold War, and the USSR used their network to spread other fictitious reports (see above paragraph. Rinse and repeat.)

    The CIA saw what they were doing and did it back to them, spreading false reports throughout northern Asia and then to the more populous western regions. Suddenly, UFOs were a worldwide phenomenon!

    As Paul Harvey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... used to say, "And that's the rest of the story."

  30. "Goverment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's spelled "Gubberment" ... or is it "spelt"

    Damn it hard being a word nazi nowadays ... woops, am I allowed to say Nazi?

  31. Re:Surprised they didn't find a way to blame Russi by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    The story is in so far accurate as the story made world news aprox. 2 years ago when the incident happened (and I think it also was covered then here on /. )... now thy only disclosed the "internal papers" or what ever.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  32. Geographic isolation and homogeneous society by Solandri · · Score: 1

    I see the same thing among (South) Koreans. They believe in weird things like fan death. It's basically gossip (or "fake news" as the media has started calling it) which has reached critical mass within the entire population - it's repeated enough that people believe it to be true because "everyone else" thinks it's true. Most populations have enough churn from neighbors that they get enough new people who haven't been exposed to the original gossip. These people simply don't know they're supposed to conform and when they express an outside opinion which differs from accepted belief, it provides enough basis for people to begin to question the gossip, and which point the gossip story quickly unravels.

    But if the population is geographically isolated, sometimes they don't get enough outside opinions to break this self-propagating cycle. Chile has this isolation in the form of the Andes mountain range along its eastern border, and the Pacific ocean on the west. In South Korea's case, it's because the country is at the end of a peninsula with the most reclusive nation on earth as their only connected border. Until the last couple decades, churn from Japan (the other nearest neighbor) was limited due to lingering animosity over the colonial period during WWII. Speaking of which, Japan being a large island nation has it too. They come up with cute things like people's personalities being tied to blood type.

    It's worth pointing out that these beliefs are not always supernatural. It can happen with anything which is difficult or impossible to disprove, especially when it's advocated by seeming eyewitness testimony or people wanting it to be true. Coercion of children to provide false testimony and seemingly incompetent disabled people being secretly competent are good examples.

  33. They never listen by tekkahtek · · Score: 1

    Dammit, I told all my little ETs to stay out of Chile for a while. Do they listen? Of course not. I understand you have the same trouble with your little Earthlings. I just hope they don't start another war. Those pyramids almost did us in last time.

  34. Incompetent third world military is incompetent by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    This exactly. In other news, incompetent third world military is incompetent. They get advanced imaging FLIR hardware and have zero clue of the thermodynamics behind it or what things look like in IR, see commercial flight from nearby airport and think it is UFO... Not shocking at all, the only shocking thing is how desperate Slashdot is for some fake news clickbait.

    I have been using FLIR cameras for almost 20 years now, and unless you understand the principles behind what is going on, some everyday things can look pretty bizarre (like the candles having a much larger corona in IR than in visible light.) If you give a FLIR to a bunch of high school graduates fresh out of whatever counts for training in south America and tell them that it can see things you normally can't without getting into the details, mis-identifications like this are very likely, I'm just glad they were too far away to try to shoot down their "UFO"...

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      see commercial flight from nearby airport

      Would you like to know how I know you haven't actually watched the video?

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    2. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the link above in Xenographic's post?

      https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      Did you watch the video?

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    4. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the explination makes perfect sense. If there was an aircraft there (according to publically available records and airplane tracking applications), it makes perfect sense for it to be what the IR camera picked up. Thing look weird in IR because the human brain isn't used to interpreting what it is seeing, this is nothing new.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      Ok, then where did the plane go on visible-light filter?

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    6. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      It is too small to see. The IR signiture of a plane is huge, which is why many missiles are IR guided. The link above that I pointed out goes through all these arguments. You really should start with a look through of the post.

      Also, the plane is very far away from the camera, using the measuring tool in Google Earth, it looks like the aircraft was about 60 miles away, so it would be pretty tiny in visible at that range.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    7. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for your argument, I live in Denver, so I'm very familiar with what a big ole jet airliner looks like from 60 miles away. Now that I've looked into the link a bit more, though, that page's theory indicates that the chopper would be pointing at a flight which was roughly 30 degrees from North, but the chopper's compass is never pointed past 10 degrees from North.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    8. Re:Incompetent third world military is incompetent by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      Hm, apparently the IR camera was pointed 8 degrees clockwise from the body of the chopper. Never mind.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  35. Cultural Blindspots ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Every culture has its blindspots.

    Arabs for example have a blindspot where all world events are a product of conspiracies by various entities. From real ones (USA, Israel), to quasi-entities ('The West'), to imaginary ones (Free Masonry, World Government, ...etc.) Everything that happens is planned and executed by these entities, from wars, revolutions, downing an airplane (e.g. Egypt Air 990, MetroJet). No amount of reasoning will sway the average Arab that there are other explanations that hold more to logic than the usual suspects conspiring on us.

    Today I learned that Chileans have a blindspot for believing in UFOs.

  36. Re:Surprised they didn't find a way to blame Russi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone bothered to ask the pilots of those 2 flights if they saw any UFOs?

  37. Re:What Fucking "Experts" by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Do you people actually read the words in the articles? Cause there aren't that many.

    You must be new here! 8-)

    No one but you and I read the original articles...

  38. Re:What Fucking "Experts" by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    P.S., There are no such things as UFOs. It was just a weather balloon! ;-)