Slashdot Mirror


Russia Demands LinkedIn App Takedown, Apple and Google Comply (fortune.com)

Russia has forced Apple and Google to remove the LinkedIn mobile app from their Russian application markets, the latest chapter in a months-long campaign against the professional networking site. From a report on Fortune: A recently-passed Russian law requires that any company holding data on Russians house that data within Russia. Russia began blocking LinkedIn's website last November under that law, which some critics argue is an indirect form of censorship. The removal of the LinkedIn app from Apples App Store and Google's Play shows the willingness of major internet gatekeepers to comply with individual nations' data-control laws, on both the web and mobile devices.

110 comments

  1. In soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Post firsts you

    1. Re: In soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linkedin is a spyware instrument. Good riddance.

  2. Russia && Trump == USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does Donald Trump use an iPhone or an Android?

    1. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Well now he can use both.

    2. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Trump uses iPhone. His team uses an Android.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That's backwards. His posts on Twitter are from an Android device, and he's known to use a Samsung phone. His campaign team was posting using an iPhone.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    4. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Thanks.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  3. Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just another reason Free Software is still relevant in the era of the app store.

    1. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, with Free Software, you can write a competitor to linkedin, and STILL be forced to comply with the same goddamned restrictions that proprietary, walled-garden software is forced to comply with!

      The problem is not that they've somehow "locked up your data in a proprietary container." The problem is that the Russian government has declared that anybody offering a service like LinkedIn MUST store data for Russian accounts in a place where Russia has legal jurisdiction. Free software does NOTHING to change that, the only thing it does is allow you to build a "free" competing service, and get thrown in jail for flouting the same laws LinkedIn is refusing to follow.

    2. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK Great, make a FOSS version of LinkedIn, which then is useless because all the data is stored elsewhere.

    3. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's the point. If you want proprietary apps in Russia, and the company isn't moving, you are screwed. If it were free software, open and house it in Russia, and you are done. Free software does not solve all problems, but it would solve this.

    4. Re:Lessons re-learned by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I think he's refering to a distributed model, where every user would be able to either host their own data storage or pick their own host.
      Kind of like the distributed Facebook competitor "Diaspora". Remember that project? Me neither.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue isn't if it's FOSS/Proprietary, the issue is where the data is stored.

      LinkedIn could make their app still closed source and with a simple ifRussian config, tell it to pull information from a different set of servers.

    6. Re:Lessons re-learned by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      Just another reason Free Software is still relevant in the era of the app store.

      This is a problem of data, not of code.

    7. Re:Lessons re-learned by unrtst · · Score: 1

      LinkedIn could make their app still closed source and with a simple ifRussian config, tell it to pull information from a different set of servers.

      (bold by me)
      This is the point. How are you stating it so clearly and yet still missing it?
      With proprietary software, the proprietor is the only one that can make that decision, and you are subject to their choices so long as you wish to use said software/service. If it were free/open/libre, anyone could decide it was worth the effort to setup and configure a Russian version that complies with their laws.

      LinkedIn has decided not to comply with the Russian law at this time, so they are being blocked and everyone loses** (Russians can't use the service anymore, and no one else will see new/updated Russian data anymore).

      ** or wins, if you happen to dislike LinkedIn

    8. Re:Lessons re-learned by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      It is likely someone will use free software to create a Linkedin clone for Russian users and have their data stored in Russia.

    9. Re:Lessons re-learned by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      Actually, GP is correct and you are missing the point. If the software was open source, you, or Russia, or anyone could use it to make a CLONE. That STILL would not solve the issue of LinkedIn not storing the collected data in Russia. You cannot force a large corporation to move their ALREADY EXISTING data to another country simply by forking their open source software and making some changes.

      The issue Russia seems to have is they want the DATA inside Russia, presumably because they want unfettered access to it. Open sourcing the software absolutely will not "solve" that for them.

    10. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This software at the hospital is FOSS, what do you mean I don't have unfettered access to all medical data for all patients?

    11. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy fuck dude. are you some kind of a retard or something? you think software is data stored in a database?

      you should try compiling your own copy of postgres and you'll have a bunch of people's financial data. I here jp morgan's web servers run postgres.

      problem: you have to store data on a different server
      solution: compile some code

      are you seriously a complete fucking retard? you don't understand that a copy of linked-in software is not linked-in itself? I've got a rolex to sell you. half price - only $5k.

    12. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, you can make the clone IN RUSSIA if it was open source. That would totally solve the problem. No, you can't force a company to move their data, but then again, you are talking about a proprietary company. Sure, you would have to get your data and transfer it to the linkein clone IN RUSSIA, but at least it's doable with open source.

    13. Re:Lessons re-learned by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      So I should have access to the data in any document made with FOSS??
      Cool, give me all that sales data from that Calc file, the specs for that un-released widget since you did it in Blender, oh and your personal information you wrote up in that Writer file.

    14. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      n-n-n-no! FOSS! That's the answer to any software problems!! ;_;

    15. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is likely someone will use free software to create a Linkedin clone for Russian users and have their data stored in Russia.

      If you use an Android based phone, you can just sideload the official App. You don't have to get it from the Google App store or find some shady 3rd party software.
      Apple fanbois are out of luck.

    16. Re:Lessons re-learned by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Can't individual users download the apps themselves? You need Google's permission to install an app now?

    17. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The decentralization of the data is what is needed. A copy is stored in Russia and everywhere else.

  4. Censorship/User's privacy protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I don't like Putin in the least. That said, I'm more and more uneasy seeing how "our" and "their" leaders are resembling more and more each other -- and this with the consent (no: with loud acclamation!) of the majority (btw. as Putin or Erdogan have).

    Fucking scary, if you ask me.

    1. Re:Censorship/User's privacy protection? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Censorship/User's privacy protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, Trump has been getting paid by laundering Russian money since then 90s with Bayrock Group financing him after US companies wouldn't touch his idiotic business practices - like being the only money losing casino in Atlantic City for years.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ct...

  5. Imagine a world where that's even possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If anyone is so overwhelmingly attracted to the idea of allowing a company like Apple or Google to control the "application market" that they see, then they deserve to not have many applications, and for their computer to be significantly less capable than everyone else's. The whole point of turning all your selection power over to some company, is to personally have less power. So this works out great.

    Meanwhile, in Real Life, the market simply is the market. Nobody can remove someone else's product from it. Imagine how amazingly absurd that would be. The only way to get to that level of absurdity, would be to buy a computer where someone else controls what software you're allowed to use.

    1. Re:Imagine a world where that's even possible by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      If anyone is so overwhelmingly attracted to the idea of allowing a company like Apple or Google to control the "application market" that they see, then they deserve to not have many applications, and for their computer to be significantly less capable than everyone else's. The whole point of turning all your selection power over to some company, is to personally have less power. So this works out great.

      Meanwhile, in Real Life, the market simply is the market. Nobody can remove someone else's product from it. Imagine how amazingly absurd that would be. The only way to get to that level of absurdity, would be to buy a computer where someone else controls what software you're allowed to use.

      ...and thus the iPhone was born!

  6. Decentralization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of this shenanigans goes away when the smart programmers finally start deploying decentralized apps, where there is no central point on which an inherently corrupt actor (such as any government) can put pressure. In the future, there will not be "a" LinkedIn or "an" Uber, but rather a cloud of participants so large that there's no conceivable way to "turn it off". The future is an immortal decentralization of intent.

    1. Re:Decentralization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right - because we all know exactly how quickly open & decentralized social networks catch on!

      Bro, two predictions:
      1) 2017 is the year of the Linux Desktop!
      2) 2017 is the year of Diaspora!

    2. Re:Decentralization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet WAS decentralized! That's how it was born, and how all the early services like usenet worked. After the Eternal September though, the masses have made it crystal clear that they want it to be centralized, censored by governments or companies or both, and to transfer control from the end user to central authorities. Every choice they have made has been in that direction.

    3. Re:Decentralization by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Excellent point... and in theory, the internet should route around disruption like censorship.

      Unfortunately, legal jurisdiction on the Internet is the quintessential slippery slope. I would love to hear ways to deal with the inherent conflict, but as it stands today there is no easy way to avoid lowest-common denominator compliance.

    4. Re:Decentralization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Same AC as you're replying to here). I don't know either :(. I think "routing around censorship" was viable when the predominant net-culture valued freedom of communication, but that's becoming less true all the time. When the original culture got swamped by another that values centralized control, the mechanisms that routed around censorship started to degrade and be subverted, or require so much technical know-how that almost no one can do it. Sure, you can route around censorship... as long as you don't want to communicate with anybody else.

      I fear we've gone too far now to stop it. Oppressive governments and large corporations the world over have seen how much power control over all human communication brings them, and they want more. They've also seen that people don't mind, and will happily climb into the cage, if you gild it. I don't see any force sufficient to halt that slide. There simply aren't enough of us left, and we're more and more marginalized every passing year.

      I mourn what the internet was, and what I fear it will never again be. The steps are small, but they are many, and going the wrong way.

    5. Re:Decentralization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop blaming the oppressive governments and corporations. Governments can only become oppressive when their citizens roll over and let them. The "I can't fight the government because I might get killed" is no excuse. These days people just chose to runaway and become refugees because they lack the courage to fight. If you are unwilling to fight why should others be burdened with taking care of you? And corporations only have as much power as the people give them. The world is over overcrowded with blithering idiots. The kind of idiots that think using Facebook and Twitter counts as a marketable technical skill. The modern day computer technology was pioneered by people in the 80's and those same people are still responsible for improving the technology today. Today's bright thinkers think writing apps for their phone actually matter. How many social networking applications do people really need?

  7. iOS users might be out of luck. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:iOS users might be out of luck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      iOS users, never fear. Through the power of open Web APIs, you can still connect to LinkedIn without a native app. Just connect to https://www.linkedin.com./

      Unless, of course, you're in a jurisdiction where NETWORK CONNECTIONS TO LINKEDIN SERVERS ARE BLOCKED, in which case even if you use the AMAZING side-loading or web access workarounds, you will STILL be unable to connect to the service.

      But Android users will DEFINITELY be happy that they can load a native app that connects to nothing. I'm sure they'll get great value out of it.

    2. Re:iOS users might be out of luck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use a VPN.

    3. Re:iOS users might be out of luck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do the same thing on your iOS device, and use the linkedin web site over a VPN.

      You still get all the grating, obnoxious notifications that you get in the native app, and it's based on OPEN STANDARDS, because FREEDOM!

  8. So? by c · · Score: 2

    If Russia has any clue, the LinkedIn domains are already blacklisted. Removing the apps shouldn't be much more than adding insult to injury.

    And since Android users could sideload it, it's practically ineffective unless Apple owns a much larger chunk of the Russian market than they did last time I looked.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we get to push our laws into foreign countries?

      Depends on which country your talking about when you use 'we'.

    2. Re:So? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 2

      Do we get to push our laws into foreign countries?
      Yes, all the time. We arrested Manual Noriega who was the dictator of his own country from drug trafficking in his own country.
      We arrested a Russian citizen for break the U.S. DMCA in a way required by Russian law (when he landed in the United states for a conference).
      We try to force our laws to be enforced all over the world all the time.

      If so, can foreign countries start enforcing their laws in our country?
      Believe me they try. That is in some ways the point of the U.N. and international treaties etc.
      Do U.S. companies honor Russian and Chinese copyright? Many other examples here.

        More to the point, Russia wants to force any company doing business in Russia to host it's Russian data in Russia so it can enforce Russian laws related to Russian data without having to push it's laws into other countries. Pretty smart, even if it is a pain for internet companies. The intern is a jurisdictional nightmare, sooner or later the powers that be will find effective ways to adapt to it, this , although technically ugly does solve a lot of problems. Now any transaction with a Russian citizen is a transaction that takes place in Russia.

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we get to push our laws into foreign countries?

      Trick question. We're America, foreign countries exist only because we allow them to exist.

    4. Re:So? by yurikhan · · Score: 1

      > seriously, would you want your private information stored on a server in a foreign country?

      YES PLEASE.

      Seriously, would you, as a citizen of the Free Internet, rather have your private information stored on a server in Russia or in a foreign country?

      Thought so.

    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As stupid as it sounds Russians wants their information stored outside of Russia, but so does USA people.

  9. Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

    The removal of the LinkedIn app from Apples App Store and Google's Play shows the willingness of major internet gatekeepers to comply with individual nations' data-control laws, on both the web and mobile devices.

    Since exactly when have any company on earth managed to ignore the existing laws in countries where they operate?

    1. Re:Ignore the law by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Have you heard of Uber?

      Kidding aside, historically it came down to if you had a legal presence in a place then you needed to comply with the laws of the place. Now things are much more muddled.

    2. Re:Ignore the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've heard of this company called Apple maybe?

    3. Re:Ignore the law by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      Uber

    4. Re:Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      So you even missed the TFS where Apple also complied?

    5. Re:Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      And they are currently fighting how many lawsuits and outright bans from various countries? From the looks of it both Apple and Google want to take part of the Russian market so of course they have to obey the local laws there.

    6. Re:Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      No it's not muddled, if you have legal presence in a place you have to comply with the laws of the place. The reason Uber manages to dodge some of the bullets fired at them is because they have no legal presence in the place, it's the drivers that do and thus they are the ones getting into trouble. Both Apple and Google want to have physical and thus legal presence in Russia so there is no Uber-like situation here.

      And judging by how things went for Kim DotCom, TPB and so forth, Uber might soon find themselves into uncomfortable conditions. Apparently they where involved in over 173 lawsuits just in 2015, that number have probably increased over the last year.

  10. Website too? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

    I would imagine both their apps and the website pull the data from no Russian servers. So is linkedin.com blocked in Russia?

    1. Re:Website too? by EvilSS · · Score: 1
      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Website too? by Merk42 · · Score: 2

      So all Apple/Google did was pull apps that are essentially useless because they wouldn't be able to communicate with the servers to pull data anyway?

    3. Re:Website too? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Maybe. China and NYT went through this recently and although nyt.com was blocked the apps still worked, so China told Apple to remove them. It's possible the apps still worked, creating a bypass to the blocked site. In theory Russia should be able to look and see what servers the apps use for content and block those but I guess this is just easier.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  11. Russia is not the only company to require this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe several European countries have similar mandates.

    And an international company, whether that is Apple, or Google or Linkedin, usually has to comply with the laws of the country they operate in whether they like those laws or not. Unless of course they choose to abandon that market altogether.

    1. Re:Russia is not the only company to require this. by unrtst · · Score: 4, Informative

      The EU laws are similar, but different. They apply to companies with a presence in the EU, and protect the personal information of their citizens (data may not leave the country without dealing with more red tape). The RU law requires that the data be written to a server in Russia first, but the data may then leave the country - it protects their ability to access that data, rather than protecting the data. The impact is similar, but the differences are quite important.
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

  12. Cue the trolls by Comboman · · Score: 0

    Cue all the paid Russian/Trump trolls who will now post and tell us that this is somehow a good thing.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Cue the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can get paid for liking Russua, Putin and Trump? Where do i sign up?

    2. Re:Cue the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke's on you!

      What's the difference between a member of the 50 centy party and a Trump supporter?

      The Trump supporters are dumb enough to work for free.

  13. Re:just do what russia wants by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How would Trump get his money transferred then?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  14. Can we talk? by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't give a goddam rat's ass about LinkedIn.

    It's a spammy piece of shit that's been hacked over and over again and it's useless a tits on a boar.

    It's business model is just like the fucking dating sites.

    --

    Russian is a sovereign country and can do whatever the shit they want.

    I'm in another sovereign country and I convinced management that LinkedIn is crappy.

    It's banned.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Can we talk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair, LinkedIn is crap and Russia can block it if they want for whatever reason they want.

      It is, however, important to note why and remember that for the future.

      Russia can block it because their government authoritarian, and they are doing it either to favor a local competitor and/or as a method of information control. (Likely both)

      Remember Russia blocks Pornhub because every year Pornhub publishes a very interesting and informational report of porn viewing habits broken down by gender, region, etc.. And it always shows what really embarrassing porn viewing habits come from the Russian public.

    2. Re:Can we talk? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's not much to this story. If LinkedIn doesn't want to store data on Russians inside Russia, then they can't operate there. Fine. This is the exact same reason why our company has a server in South Africa. It's not about free speech or whatever else, if the country wants you to store data on their citizens inside their country, then you can either comply or not give access to that country. I don't see how anyone should have a problem with that. If you can switch around the story and insert the name of your own country in place of Russia, and still be outraged, then you probably just like being outraged.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Can we talk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AmicusNYCL CTO of vaporware inc. of phantasyland "ne'er-do-well"-ville home of blowhard windbag hot air & no substance! AmicusNYCL does bugfree code w/ 0 lines (doesn't do squat, it's non-existent https://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10024927&cid=53584645/ hahahaha).

    4. Re:Can we talk? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Stop hitting yourself, APK.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:Can we talk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stinkedin must die.

    6. Re:Can we talk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AmicusNYCL CTO of vaporware inc. of phantasyland "ne'er-do-well"-ville home of blowhard windbag hot air & no substance! AmicusNYCL does bugfree code w/ 0 lines (doesn't do squat, it's non-existent https://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10024927&cid=53584645/ hahahaha).

  15. So? by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Do we get to push our laws into foreign countries?

    If so, can foreign countries start enforcing their laws in our country?

    Their house, their business. Our house, our business.

    Push products they do want and maybe they'll change the mind on products they don't.

    And seriously, would you want your private information stored on a server in a foreign country? Seems like a no brainer for Russia.

  16. But apple will not help the FBI! trump needs to pu by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    But apple will not help the FBI! trump needs to put tim cook in his place.

  17. Why so impatient? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Why are they so impatient?
    Just a few more weeks and every database in the US will be hosted in Russia.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  18. So ... ? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    Is all the data in Google Play and Apple app store about Russians stored on servers in Russia?

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    1. Re:So ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how I gathered it. If I were Russia I would want information about Russians stay within Russia. Doesn't really sound all that unreasonable to me. It isn't down to the individual, but rather companies that want to operate in Russia dealing with the Russian people's information.

      I'd prefer US companies keep my records local and not hosted wherever.

      This wouldn't even be posted if Trump wasn't president-elect. Thanks Dems, you ran a candidate that couldn't even beat Trump, FFS.

  19. I disagree, my fellow AC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with Free Software, you can write a competitor to linkedin,...get thrown in jail for flouting the same laws LinkedIn is refusing to follow.

    I disagree. These folks are complying for profits - they take down those services but yet keep other business in that country. You really think if Apple says FU that Russia is gonna somehow imprison Cook? Nah. Or the directors or stockholders? Plah-ease!

    Those companies are doing what they are doing to keep other businesses they have in that country. THAT is the only leverage the Russian government has: REVENUES!

    So, a F/OSS version can just say FU - so, our version is not offered in your country .... or is it? *wink-wink-nod-nod-someone-sneaks-it-in*

  20. Re:just do what russia wants by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    They still supply lots of fine porn.

  21. Three sides to the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One the one hand, I can understand a state's desire for requiring a company that stores information to do so in a location that would subject them to the privacy laws in place...

    On the other hahttps://apple.slashdot.org/story/17/01/09/1345234/russia-demands-linkedin-app-takedown-apple-and-google-comply#nd, sometimes the best way to win an argument and show the error with the opposing parties position, is to give them what they want. So google and apple "capitulating" will make a valuable service unavailable to the citizens of that jurisdiction, which will result in public dissatisfaction with the outcome and a demand for change from within.

    If LinkedIn doesn't want to establish an office within that jurisdiction, they can choose not to, but don't get to cry about a competitor stepping in to fill the vacuum.

  22. Russia by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Russia is doing the right thing for their citizens here. App owner refused to store citizen data in country, app gets blocked. That's how it SHOULD be. Otherwise, your citizen's data is available to others without going through your country's due process. Worse, if it's stored in the US (where I live) there is no due process if the data isn't stored in your home.

    1. Re:Russia by yurikhan · · Score: 1

      You would be right if it was a plan to protect the citizens’ privacy.

      However the plan is to put Russia(n government) in a preferential position to violate said privacy.

  23. Those evil Russians and Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada has laws restricting the location of data to only Canada based on which province your business is located in, if your business operates in the private or public sector and which industry your business works in. So do other countries. Please stop with the "Russia is evil" crap. Are you gearing the sheep up for a war or what?

  24. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A country stepping in to ensure data being held by foreign entities is protected within its data infrastructure. What's wrong with that? How do you guys feel about YOUR data being held offshore somewhere???

  25. Interesting technicial hurdle by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Like many of you, I was wondering "OK, so why don't they just spin up a few AWS or Azure instances in Russia to make their government happy?"

    Then I realized that AWS doesn't have a hosting center in Russia. Neither does Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud.

    All of a sudden, it looks like they would have to make a custom one off server farm to appease Russia. It probably isn't worth the effort for them to do so.

  26. Re: just do what russia wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump just calls the Clinton Fdn, the Clinton Fdn call the Saudis, Saudis call Russia, who transfers money to the Clinton Fdn, who then transfers it to Trump.

  27. Information wants to be free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is what I would tell both the Russian govt AND Linkedin,Apple, Google, etc.

    That said, If you're already playing at this table (superpowers, national sovereignty, "anti-globalism", etc), censorship in service of extortion seems anti-climactic. Even if the extortion didn't start in Russia.

  28. Re:just do what russia wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want to be on the internet, you can just keep off it, you know. But that's not what you want, is it? You want *other* people to stop talking to Russia, you little fascist.

  29. Re: just do what russia wants by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

    While both have very dubious accounting practices, only one foundation actually helps people. Well, people besides Trump.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  30. Russia is not America, so it is acceptable by mi · · Score: 1

    Had it been American authorities, Apple would've put up a heroic fight. But helping Russian (and Chinese) efforts to keep tabs on their citizens and enable dragnets by foreign governments — well, that's just complying with local laws, nothing to see here.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Russia is not America, so it is acceptable by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If Apple had the data in an accessible form, they likely wouldn't have been able to fight, and would have lost a lot of support.

      You're comparing data locality to circumventing security and forcing a company (i.e., people) to do work to that end (and to severely damage their brand as a result).

    2. Re:Russia is not America, so it is acceptable by mi · · Score: 1

      I'm comparing resisting the perfectly reasonable request from the US government to help it access data on one cell phone used by a dead terrorist, with agreeing to aid mass-surveillance by the Russian and Chinese governments.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  31. Irresponsible behaviour and probably politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LinkedIn has failed its Russian users big time. There is no business reason not to arrange the necessary infrastructure to keep a 140-million country on. People must not have to surrender their personal data under foreign law - which they cannot possible influence.

  32. Russia and data by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    If all they are trying to do is keep their citizen's data within their own country and out of foreign hands, I don't see the problem. We bitch when China hacks our credit cards, so finding legal loopholes to do the same thing when companies have no business to personal info isn't so different, regardless of how "righteous" you think yours is.

  33. Great! by sexconker · · Score: 1

    They've got a law that states companies holding data on their citizens must keep that data within their own borders. This is great, and they have good reason to have such a law. The icing on the cake is that they're actually trying to enforce the law.

    LinkedIn, the world's largest spam network, being the current whipping boy is a bonus. I doubt LinkedIn has much of a Russian userbase, so if it comes down to it LinkedIn can just never comply with Russia's laws and Russia can't do shit beyond try to block their website in a continual cat and mouse game.

    Google and Apple care about their Russian market enough to enforce Russia's laws. This isn't news. They already bend over backwards for China. The US government and media were hypercritical of China until Trump happened, now they're just trying to flip the script and put all of that bad juju on Russia.

  34. Fucking Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course these corporations comply with the law! I mean, in general I believe all US Corporations attempt to comply with laws. Would you want corporations to only comply with the laws they agree with?

    No.

    Of course not. You just don't like this law so you bitch about it.

    You are a fucking moron.

  35. Re:just do what russia wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want to be on the internet, you can just keep off it, you know. But that's not what you want, is it? You want *other* people to stop talking to Russia, you little fascist.

    Why don't you first prove that talking to Russia is worth it to people *other* than criminals, you ignorant shit.

  36. How does taking down LinkedIn work where.... by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Here is a scenario. Let's say I was a Russian who came to the US for a few days, visited the Apple Store on my phone, downloaded all the banned apps, including LinkedIn, and then flew back there.

    Once I was back, how would either the Apple Store - or the Play Store - not having the app online - be of any use? Particularly if I disable the app store once I am back?

  37. Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Trump likely to normalize relations with Russia there will be a massive outsourcing of engineering work that formerly had been blocked by export controls. By not playing nice with LinkedIn Russia is screwing over candidates to fill those jobs. This only makes sense if they have some other state-run service to take the place of LinkedIn.

    1. Re: Makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump has normalized his relations with Putin; the rest of the United States, not so much.

  38. Cut off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, if that's the law, shouldn't Russia just cut off the external internet completely?

  39. Re:just do what russia wants by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    How would Trump get his money transferred then?

    Operatives exchange briefcases full of cash for envelopes of IOUs at Checkpoint Charlie.

  40. Re:just do what russia wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from someone who lived there 4 years of his adult life:

    russia is a great place to live for a few years. the girls are super young and hot, easy as hell to fuck, don't mind you fucking all of their friends. if you're a chump like most of you people on slashdot though, you'll fly away there with blue balls and empty pockets.

    and.. that is literally all russia is good for. a fun place to live with great clubs and lots of hot easy pussy. there's ukraine, belarus, etc - a slightly uglier and less fun but much cheaper fun place to live and fuck lots of still-much-hotter than american pussy.

  41. This is actually awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many agree with Russia on this wholeheartedly. Fuck the USA in this regard

  42. Link? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Where is the link to this story? :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  43. Re: just do what russia wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Links to Clinton supporting fake news central Washington Post, which is retracting "Russian hacking" stories daily.

  44. Re:just do what russia wants by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Some people don't like being eskimo brothers with a whole country.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure