Slashdot Mirror


Russia Demands LinkedIn App Takedown, Apple and Google Comply (fortune.com)

Russia has forced Apple and Google to remove the LinkedIn mobile app from their Russian application markets, the latest chapter in a months-long campaign against the professional networking site. From a report on Fortune: A recently-passed Russian law requires that any company holding data on Russians house that data within Russia. Russia began blocking LinkedIn's website last November under that law, which some critics argue is an indirect form of censorship. The removal of the LinkedIn app from Apples App Store and Google's Play shows the willingness of major internet gatekeepers to comply with individual nations' data-control laws, on both the web and mobile devices.

59 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. In soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Post firsts you

  2. Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just another reason Free Software is still relevant in the era of the app store.

    1. Re:Lessons re-learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, with Free Software, you can write a competitor to linkedin, and STILL be forced to comply with the same goddamned restrictions that proprietary, walled-garden software is forced to comply with!

      The problem is not that they've somehow "locked up your data in a proprietary container." The problem is that the Russian government has declared that anybody offering a service like LinkedIn MUST store data for Russian accounts in a place where Russia has legal jurisdiction. Free software does NOTHING to change that, the only thing it does is allow you to build a "free" competing service, and get thrown in jail for flouting the same laws LinkedIn is refusing to follow.

    2. Re:Lessons re-learned by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I think he's refering to a distributed model, where every user would be able to either host their own data storage or pick their own host.
      Kind of like the distributed Facebook competitor "Diaspora". Remember that project? Me neither.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Lessons re-learned by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      Just another reason Free Software is still relevant in the era of the app store.

      This is a problem of data, not of code.

    4. Re:Lessons re-learned by unrtst · · Score: 1

      LinkedIn could make their app still closed source and with a simple ifRussian config, tell it to pull information from a different set of servers.

      (bold by me)
      This is the point. How are you stating it so clearly and yet still missing it?
      With proprietary software, the proprietor is the only one that can make that decision, and you are subject to their choices so long as you wish to use said software/service. If it were free/open/libre, anyone could decide it was worth the effort to setup and configure a Russian version that complies with their laws.

      LinkedIn has decided not to comply with the Russian law at this time, so they are being blocked and everyone loses** (Russians can't use the service anymore, and no one else will see new/updated Russian data anymore).

      ** or wins, if you happen to dislike LinkedIn

    5. Re:Lessons re-learned by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      It is likely someone will use free software to create a Linkedin clone for Russian users and have their data stored in Russia.

    6. Re:Lessons re-learned by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      Actually, GP is correct and you are missing the point. If the software was open source, you, or Russia, or anyone could use it to make a CLONE. That STILL would not solve the issue of LinkedIn not storing the collected data in Russia. You cannot force a large corporation to move their ALREADY EXISTING data to another country simply by forking their open source software and making some changes.

      The issue Russia seems to have is they want the DATA inside Russia, presumably because they want unfettered access to it. Open sourcing the software absolutely will not "solve" that for them.

    7. Re:Lessons re-learned by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      So I should have access to the data in any document made with FOSS??
      Cool, give me all that sales data from that Calc file, the specs for that un-released widget since you did it in Blender, oh and your personal information you wrote up in that Writer file.

    8. Re:Lessons re-learned by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Can't individual users download the apps themselves? You need Google's permission to install an app now?

  3. Censorship/User's privacy protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I don't like Putin in the least. That said, I'm more and more uneasy seeing how "our" and "their" leaders are resembling more and more each other -- and this with the consent (no: with loud acclamation!) of the majority (btw. as Putin or Erdogan have).

    Fucking scary, if you ask me.

    1. Re:Censorship/User's privacy protection? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Censorship/User's privacy protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, Trump has been getting paid by laundering Russian money since then 90s with Bayrock Group financing him after US companies wouldn't touch his idiotic business practices - like being the only money losing casino in Atlantic City for years.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ct...

  4. Imagine a world where that's even possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If anyone is so overwhelmingly attracted to the idea of allowing a company like Apple or Google to control the "application market" that they see, then they deserve to not have many applications, and for their computer to be significantly less capable than everyone else's. The whole point of turning all your selection power over to some company, is to personally have less power. So this works out great.

    Meanwhile, in Real Life, the market simply is the market. Nobody can remove someone else's product from it. Imagine how amazingly absurd that would be. The only way to get to that level of absurdity, would be to buy a computer where someone else controls what software you're allowed to use.

    1. Re:Imagine a world where that's even possible by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      If anyone is so overwhelmingly attracted to the idea of allowing a company like Apple or Google to control the "application market" that they see, then they deserve to not have many applications, and for their computer to be significantly less capable than everyone else's. The whole point of turning all your selection power over to some company, is to personally have less power. So this works out great.

      Meanwhile, in Real Life, the market simply is the market. Nobody can remove someone else's product from it. Imagine how amazingly absurd that would be. The only way to get to that level of absurdity, would be to buy a computer where someone else controls what software you're allowed to use.

      ...and thus the iPhone was born!

  5. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

    Well now he can use both.

  6. iOS users might be out of luck. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:iOS users might be out of luck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      iOS users, never fear. Through the power of open Web APIs, you can still connect to LinkedIn without a native app. Just connect to https://www.linkedin.com./

      Unless, of course, you're in a jurisdiction where NETWORK CONNECTIONS TO LINKEDIN SERVERS ARE BLOCKED, in which case even if you use the AMAZING side-loading or web access workarounds, you will STILL be unable to connect to the service.

      But Android users will DEFINITELY be happy that they can load a native app that connects to nothing. I'm sure they'll get great value out of it.

  7. So? by c · · Score: 2

    If Russia has any clue, the LinkedIn domains are already blacklisted. Removing the apps shouldn't be much more than adding insult to injury.

    And since Android users could sideload it, it's practically ineffective unless Apple owns a much larger chunk of the Russian market than they did last time I looked.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
    1. Re:So? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 2

      Do we get to push our laws into foreign countries?
      Yes, all the time. We arrested Manual Noriega who was the dictator of his own country from drug trafficking in his own country.
      We arrested a Russian citizen for break the U.S. DMCA in a way required by Russian law (when he landed in the United states for a conference).
      We try to force our laws to be enforced all over the world all the time.

      If so, can foreign countries start enforcing their laws in our country?
      Believe me they try. That is in some ways the point of the U.N. and international treaties etc.
      Do U.S. companies honor Russian and Chinese copyright? Many other examples here.

        More to the point, Russia wants to force any company doing business in Russia to host it's Russian data in Russia so it can enforce Russian laws related to Russian data without having to push it's laws into other countries. Pretty smart, even if it is a pain for internet companies. The intern is a jurisdictional nightmare, sooner or later the powers that be will find effective ways to adapt to it, this , although technically ugly does solve a lot of problems. Now any transaction with a Russian citizen is a transaction that takes place in Russia.

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
    2. Re:So? by yurikhan · · Score: 1

      > seriously, would you want your private information stored on a server in a foreign country?

      YES PLEASE.

      Seriously, would you, as a citizen of the Free Internet, rather have your private information stored on a server in Russia or in a foreign country?

      Thought so.

  8. Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

    The removal of the LinkedIn app from Apples App Store and Google's Play shows the willingness of major internet gatekeepers to comply with individual nations' data-control laws, on both the web and mobile devices.

    Since exactly when have any company on earth managed to ignore the existing laws in countries where they operate?

    1. Re:Ignore the law by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Have you heard of Uber?

      Kidding aside, historically it came down to if you had a legal presence in a place then you needed to comply with the laws of the place. Now things are much more muddled.

    2. Re:Ignore the law by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      Uber

    3. Re:Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      So you even missed the TFS where Apple also complied?

    4. Re:Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      And they are currently fighting how many lawsuits and outright bans from various countries? From the looks of it both Apple and Google want to take part of the Russian market so of course they have to obey the local laws there.

    5. Re:Ignore the law by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      No it's not muddled, if you have legal presence in a place you have to comply with the laws of the place. The reason Uber manages to dodge some of the bullets fired at them is because they have no legal presence in the place, it's the drivers that do and thus they are the ones getting into trouble. Both Apple and Google want to have physical and thus legal presence in Russia so there is no Uber-like situation here.

      And judging by how things went for Kim DotCom, TPB and so forth, Uber might soon find themselves into uncomfortable conditions. Apparently they where involved in over 173 lawsuits just in 2015, that number have probably increased over the last year.

  9. Website too? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

    I would imagine both their apps and the website pull the data from no Russian servers. So is linkedin.com blocked in Russia?

    1. Re:Website too? by EvilSS · · Score: 1
      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Website too? by Merk42 · · Score: 2

      So all Apple/Google did was pull apps that are essentially useless because they wouldn't be able to communicate with the servers to pull data anyway?

    3. Re:Website too? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Maybe. China and NYT went through this recently and although nyt.com was blocked the apps still worked, so China told Apple to remove them. It's possible the apps still worked, creating a bypass to the blocked site. In theory Russia should be able to look and see what servers the apps use for content and block those but I guess this is just easier.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  10. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Trump uses iPhone. His team uses an Android.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  11. Re:just do what russia wants by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How would Trump get his money transferred then?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  12. Can we talk? by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't give a goddam rat's ass about LinkedIn.

    It's a spammy piece of shit that's been hacked over and over again and it's useless a tits on a boar.

    It's business model is just like the fucking dating sites.

    --

    Russian is a sovereign country and can do whatever the shit they want.

    I'm in another sovereign country and I convinced management that LinkedIn is crappy.

    It's banned.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Can we talk? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's not much to this story. If LinkedIn doesn't want to store data on Russians inside Russia, then they can't operate there. Fine. This is the exact same reason why our company has a server in South Africa. It's not about free speech or whatever else, if the country wants you to store data on their citizens inside their country, then you can either comply or not give access to that country. I don't see how anyone should have a problem with that. If you can switch around the story and insert the name of your own country in place of Russia, and still be outraged, then you probably just like being outraged.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Can we talk? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Stop hitting yourself, APK.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  13. So? by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Do we get to push our laws into foreign countries?

    If so, can foreign countries start enforcing their laws in our country?

    Their house, their business. Our house, our business.

    Push products they do want and maybe they'll change the mind on products they don't.

    And seriously, would you want your private information stored on a server in a foreign country? Seems like a no brainer for Russia.

  14. But apple will not help the FBI! trump needs to pu by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    But apple will not help the FBI! trump needs to put tim cook in his place.

  15. Why so impatient? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Why are they so impatient?
    Just a few more weeks and every database in the US will be hosted in Russia.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  16. Re:Cue the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can get paid for liking Russua, Putin and Trump? Where do i sign up?

  17. So ... ? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    Is all the data in Google Play and Apple app store about Russians stored on servers in Russia?

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  18. Re:just do what russia wants by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    They still supply lots of fine porn.

  19. Russia by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Russia is doing the right thing for their citizens here. App owner refused to store citizen data in country, app gets blocked. That's how it SHOULD be. Otherwise, your citizen's data is available to others without going through your country's due process. Worse, if it's stored in the US (where I live) there is no due process if the data isn't stored in your home.

    1. Re:Russia by yurikhan · · Score: 1

      You would be right if it was a plan to protect the citizens’ privacy.

      However the plan is to put Russia(n government) in a preferential position to violate said privacy.

  20. Re:Decentralization by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Excellent point... and in theory, the internet should route around disruption like censorship.

    Unfortunately, legal jurisdiction on the Internet is the quintessential slippery slope. I would love to hear ways to deal with the inherent conflict, but as it stands today there is no easy way to avoid lowest-common denominator compliance.

  21. Interesting technicial hurdle by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Like many of you, I was wondering "OK, so why don't they just spin up a few AWS or Azure instances in Russia to make their government happy?"

    Then I realized that AWS doesn't have a hosting center in Russia. Neither does Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud.

    All of a sudden, it looks like they would have to make a custom one off server farm to appease Russia. It probably isn't worth the effort for them to do so.

  22. Re: just do what russia wants by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

    While both have very dubious accounting practices, only one foundation actually helps people. Well, people besides Trump.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  23. Russia is not America, so it is acceptable by mi · · Score: 1

    Had it been American authorities, Apple would've put up a heroic fight. But helping Russian (and Chinese) efforts to keep tabs on their citizens and enable dragnets by foreign governments — well, that's just complying with local laws, nothing to see here.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Russia is not America, so it is acceptable by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If Apple had the data in an accessible form, they likely wouldn't have been able to fight, and would have lost a lot of support.

      You're comparing data locality to circumventing security and forcing a company (i.e., people) to do work to that end (and to severely damage their brand as a result).

    2. Re:Russia is not America, so it is acceptable by mi · · Score: 1

      I'm comparing resisting the perfectly reasonable request from the US government to help it access data on one cell phone used by a dead terrorist, with agreeing to aid mass-surveillance by the Russian and Chinese governments.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  24. Russia and data by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    If all they are trying to do is keep their citizen's data within their own country and out of foreign hands, I don't see the problem. We bitch when China hacks our credit cards, so finding legal loopholes to do the same thing when companies have no business to personal info isn't so different, regardless of how "righteous" you think yours is.

  25. Great! by sexconker · · Score: 1

    They've got a law that states companies holding data on their citizens must keep that data within their own borders. This is great, and they have good reason to have such a law. The icing on the cake is that they're actually trying to enforce the law.

    LinkedIn, the world's largest spam network, being the current whipping boy is a bonus. I doubt LinkedIn has much of a Russian userbase, so if it comes down to it LinkedIn can just never comply with Russia's laws and Russia can't do shit beyond try to block their website in a continual cat and mouse game.

    Google and Apple care about their Russian market enough to enforce Russia's laws. This isn't news. They already bend over backwards for China. The US government and media were hypercritical of China until Trump happened, now they're just trying to flip the script and put all of that bad juju on Russia.

  26. Re:Russia is not the only company to require this. by unrtst · · Score: 4, Informative

    The EU laws are similar, but different. They apply to companies with a presence in the EU, and protect the personal information of their citizens (data may not leave the country without dealing with more red tape). The RU law requires that the data be written to a server in Russia first, but the data may then leave the country - it protects their ability to access that data, rather than protecting the data. The impact is similar, but the differences are quite important.
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

  27. How does taking down LinkedIn work where.... by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Here is a scenario. Let's say I was a Russian who came to the US for a few days, visited the Apple Store on my phone, downloaded all the banned apps, including LinkedIn, and then flew back there.

    Once I was back, how would either the Apple Store - or the Play Store - not having the app online - be of any use? Particularly if I disable the app store once I am back?

  28. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    That's backwards. His posts on Twitter are from an Android device, and he's known to use a Samsung phone. His campaign team was posting using an iPhone.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  29. Re:Russia && Trump == USA by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected. Thanks.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  30. Re:just do what russia wants by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    How would Trump get his money transferred then?

    Operatives exchange briefcases full of cash for envelopes of IOUs at Checkpoint Charlie.

  31. Link? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Where is the link to this story? :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  32. Re:just do what russia wants by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Some people don't like being eskimo brothers with a whole country.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure