Slashdot Mirror


FBI Arrests Volkswagen Executive On Charges Related To Dieselgate (cnet.com)

According to CNET, the FBI has arrested Volkswagen executive Oliver Schmidt over the weekend on charges of conspiracy to defraud the U.S. relating to the ongoing Dieselgate emissions scandal. From the report: Schmidt headed VW's regulatory compliance office in the U.S. from 2014 to March 2015. The FBI's official Criminal Complaint states that during that time VW employees -- Schmidt included -- knowingly installed secret "defeat device" software in 475,000 diesel cars in the U.S., hiding during emissions testing the fact that those cars emitted up to 40 times the legally allowable pollution levels when on the road. The complaint asserts that by knowingly installing this secret cheat software, Schmidt and VW conspired to defraud the U.S. by impairing and impeding the Environmental Protection Agency and violating the Clean Air Act, leading to the arrest on Saturday. Schmidt is due to appear before a Federal Court in Miami on Monday.

19 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. Can we stop adding GATE to every scandal? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What you gonna do if Bill Gates is ever involved in a scandal? Call it Gatesgate?

    1. Re:Can we stop adding GATE to every scandal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BillGate

    2. Re:Can we stop adding GATE to every scandal? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Funny

      What you gonna do if Bill Gates is ever involved in a scandal? Call it Gatesgate?

      No kidding. Why do large scandals get "gate" attached to them anyhow? I understand the Watergate thing as it was the actual name of the complex it happened in. But the hundreds of scandals since, that have used it, just seem silly. "Deflategate", "Donutgate[sic]", "Nannygate(1, 2 &3)", "Antennagate", "Pengate", "Nipplegate", and my current favorite, "Pussygate". "Pussygate" sounds more like a chastity belt than a scandal.

    3. Re:Can we stop adding GATE to every scandal? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The simple answer is simply that enough English-speaking individuals over the last 43-44 years have decided that "-gate" as a suffix at the end of a word can be used to give a scandal as a memorable name. You do understand, I hope, that human language is not a static construct, that words and even morphemes and other elements of speech evolve over time, old words taking on new meanings, new words being formed either by adoption from other languages or by joining together two existing words, and so forth. So, "-gate" as a suffix has now come to a scandal, and has for over four decades gained sufficient penetration in most English-speaking jurisdictions that I'd say it's now a permanent part of the language.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Can we stop adding GATE to every scandal? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      If Bill G. breaks through a fence gate using gate-array circuity, then the scandal is called "GatesGateGateGate". Or, G4.

    5. Re:Can we stop adding GATE to every scandal? by Macdude · · Score: 2

      Can we stop adding GATE to every scandal?

      Apparently not.

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
  2. Damn, they're going after the right guy by drew_kime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's hoping this leads to some actual changes.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  3. Re:Why is this story worthy? by drew_kime · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why is this worthy of Slashdot? This is just an executive being busted by the FBI.

    Because the exec was responsible for validating code that was found to not be doing what he said it did.

    Do you have anybody in your company doing QA? Or auditing code? Think they might be interested in this?

    --
    Nope, no sig
  4. Re:Why is this story worthy? by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speak for yourself. I find this, as a former developer, to be very interesting. People aren't generally arrested over bad programming. I couldn't care less about yet another review of whatever the latest el-cheapo hobbyist gadgets are.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  5. Re:Toothless by avandesande · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... or a banker. The whole financial system collapse in 2007 and banks knowingly laundering money for mexican drug cartels (look it up, I am not kidding) and not one arrest.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  6. Re:Why is this story worthy? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree. Since this boils down to someone writing software whose explicit purpose is to cheat on government-mandated tests, I'd say it's a very interesting technical story that involves a scenario that may play out in many areas of development. Being a programmer doesn't mean moral, ethical and legal considerations cease to exist.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. In all fairness.. by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I expect they will be arresting Elizabeth Holmes as well? Or is this an American philosophy arrest, where defrauding the health of people isn't nearly as offensive as financially damaging defrauding.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  8. Re:VW cost investors $80 billion, more than Enron by avandesande · · Score: 4, Informative

    2007 financial crisis cost 22 trillion dollars, nobody was jailed.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  9. Memo to FBI by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

    About fucking time. How the bank robbers at Wells Fargo?

  10. Re:Why is this story worthy? by 4wdloop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I do not see anybody 'down in the trenches' just out of the blue or love for the job decided to do it single-handed. I would be surprised any of the softies there realized this is very illegal. Ethically perhaps they may have doubts quickly resolved by their bosses.

    I'd expect that in big corporation, like VW, the programmers are just gears in the machine. I am one for sure. They were told to improve test results and performance results. Sbdy (likely team+1/2 levels of mgnt) there decided to optimize these two cases separately hence detecting each use case. They even consulted this with VW legal team and upper mngmnt, got approval and went ahead. Than they all collected the bonuses.

    If there is not written evidence for all of these then their document retention policies are "well tuned" albeit since they must be ISO9xxx certified they must have something left in the decision chain. Hence Schmidt was charged with conspiring to fraud, evidence must exist he knowingly allowed it as he's not charged with negligence of duties of sorts (AINAL).

    --
    4wdloop
  11. Re:Why is this story worthy? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

    Performance wise it was very good software, it "knew" when it was in a test environment and behaved in a manner totally at odds with normal day to day operation. Sadly for them, researchers began a study on emissions discrepancies between European and US models of vehicles, Portable Emissions Measurement Systems showed totally different values from test rig results and the rest is yet to be played out.

    They would have gotten away with it if it hadn't been for those pesky kids at the International Council on Clean Transportation!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  12. 35 bankers in prison, but yeah the Obama admin vs by raymorris · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not quite true that *nobody* was jailed. Here are 35 bankers sent to prison:

    http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/2...

    Also some who didn't go to prison did get fines over over $100 million.

    Compared to the 1980s S&L crisis, there were certainly fewer prosecutions. One career prosecutor who is knowledgeable about both says that one reason for that is the the Obama administration, unlike the Reagan administration, was hostile toward white-blowers who could have enabled prosecution.

  13. typo: whistles-blowers by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Where my post says "white-blowers", that should be "whistle-blowers". In the 1980s, whistle-blowers gave leads to investigators and testified against bosses. The Obama administration has of course been hostile to whistle-blowers.

  14. Re:Why is this story worthy? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Take a look at page 64 of this presentation (PDF): http://roma.faster-it.de/temp/...

    Some guys decompiled the firmware and found the tables that control the engine modes, based on time and distance travelled. Note how the very narrow low emissions bands match the European test cycles perfectly.

    It was clearly very deliberately, very carefully planned, must have required extensive testing and couldn't have been done without the assistance of Bosch who designed the control unit.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC