Slashdot Mirror


Apple App Store Prices Rise in UK, India and Turkey (bbc.com)

Apple is to put up the price it charges for apps in the UK, India and Turkey. From a report on BBC: UK costs will numerically match those of the US, meaning that a program that costs $0.99 will now be 99p. That represents a 25% rise over the previous currency conversion, which was 79p. "Price tiers on the App Store are set internationally on the basis of several factors, including currency exchange rates, business practices, taxes, and the cost of doing business," it said. "These factors vary from region to region and over time." The rise will also affect in-app purchases but not subscription charges. The cost of a $0.99 app will become 80 rupees in India, representing a 33% rise from the previous price of 60 rupees.

84 comments

  1. "Business practices" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Translation: We've been pissing over our users so much that they're starting to get annoyed with us and sales are tapering off, so we're gonna raise the "exchange" prices instead to offset that.

    1. Re:"Business practices" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales are tapering off because people have moved from a 2 year upgrade cycle to a 3-5 year upgrade cycle.

    2. Re:"Business practices" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1 apps are usually slave labor that benefit only Apple (via increased sales of their hardware) and the end users (uber cheap software). The developers of these apps make little to justify the time spent building these apps.

      Do the developers still get paid 70% with these increased prices?

    3. Re:"Business practices" by Ecuador · · Score: 2

      Do the developers still get paid 70% with these increased prices?

      I assume the percentage is the same, but, interestingly, if you are not a US developer with mainly US sales, the currency conversions Apple does further reduce this. For example I am UK based and I have a little app which sells mainly in the US, and I end up closer to 60% than 70% after the conversions. I'd tell you more precisely, but it varies a bit per month and it is hard to calculate because the reports are a bit convoluted in that part (at least they were the last time I checked, almost a year ago). If it was not a hobby app and I actually expected to make a living off of it, I'd be rather annoyed... Still not the worst part of the Apple ecosystem...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    4. Re:"Business practices" by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Funny that. Innovation also seems to have moved to the same cycle.

  2. Sounds about right by Albanach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With the Pound now trading at around $1.23, and the UK app store incorporating VAT at 20% while the US store doesn't include sales tax in the list priced, this sounds about right. Certainly the "UK premium" is nothing like the 50-100% that wasn't uncommon a decade or so ago.

    Apple look simply to be pricing in the devaluation in Sterling that has occurred since the beginning of Brexit. I'm not sure anyone can find much to fault with that. The real question is how quickly Apple will move to reduce prices if/when the Pound recovers?

    1. Re:Sounds about right by Maritz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The real question is how quickly Apple will move to reduce prices if/when the Pound recovers?

      lol. How quick is "never"?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:Sounds about right by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

      Reduce prices? That was a good one.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    3. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't recover.

    4. Re: Sounds about right by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Seems the same logic for Turkey and India. Prices in the US do not include the sales tax. Other countries include it. So Apple is just accommodating this policy. They are including the import and VAT taxes in the published price.

    5. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Apple look simply to be pricing in the devaluation in Sterling that has occurred since the beginning of Brexit.

      All lies! Shut up with project fear.

      (this is sarcasm)

      prices if/when the Pound recovers

      lol.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong!

      It's going to be one of the best Brexits ever. Believe me. It's going to be terrific. And they're going to make the EU pay for it. Trust me on that one.

    7. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably right in that, but a relative change will happen all the same, when the US dollar crashes...

    8. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gonna put the Great back in Great Britain?

    9. Re:Sounds about right by Goaway · · Score: 1

      They've done it multiple times already. You just don't know because Slashdot hasn't spoon-fed the information to you.

    10. Re:Sounds about right by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Now if only they'd pay what they owe in Taxes in the UK we could afford a second NHS just to wear on Sunday's!

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    11. Re:Sounds about right by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      We getting rid of Northern Ireland then? No so it's still the United Kingdom then.

    12. Re:Sounds about right by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The real question is how quickly Apple will move to reduce prices if/when the Pound recovers

      When the Euro was introduced, everybody used that as an excuse to raise prices . . . even in countries that didn't use the Euro! Now, prices in the EU will rise, "because of the Brexit costs, caused by the UK!" Prices in the UK will rise, "because the EU is punishing us for leaving!" So it will very convenient for all the governments: they call all blame problems on something and/or someone else beyond their control.

      But folks in the UK will be wealthier! They used to have apps on their phones only worth 79p. The will now have apps that are worth 99p. Things that are more expensive are better, so UK citizens will be better off as a result of the Brexit!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    13. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theresa has just finished a speech on how terrific it's going to be. And it's all good news. Donald Trump has said he's going to make a trade deal with the UK a priority so it doesn't matter about losing the deals gained via EU membership. And although Trump is out to make America great again I'm sure he won't take advantage of a UK government so desperate to point to good news over Brexit and make a deal that's more beneficial to USA than UK.

    14. Re:Sounds about right by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      With the Pound now trading at around $1.23, and the UK app store incorporating VAT at 20% while the US store doesn't include sales tax in the list priced, this sounds about right. Certainly the "UK premium" is nothing like the 50-100% that wasn't uncommon a decade or so ago.

      Apple look simply to be pricing in the devaluation in Sterling that has occurred since the beginning of Brexit. I'm not sure anyone can find much to fault with that. The real question is how quickly Apple will move to reduce prices if/when the Pound recovers?

      Prices tend to be sticky in terms of reduction, if simply if only customers get used to the higher prices so absent a steep decline companies tend to keep prices at the higher levels once they raise prices.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    15. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      life would be so good without NI

    16. Re:Sounds about right by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They will never have to make that decision. The Pound is going to be devalued a lot more than this. It's part of our transition to a third world, low cost labour economy. Basically like India but slightly better English skills and right on Europe's doorstep.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Sounds about right by tepples · · Score: 1

      We getting rid of Northern Ireland then?

      Reportedly a majority of Northern Ireland voted "remain in the European Union". Once Britain exercises Article 50, I anticipate a referendum to rejoin Ireland gaining support.

    18. Re:Sounds about right by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Great Britain is a geographic term, the United Kingdom is a political term. Britain is synonymous with the latter, which doesn't help matters. So it doesn't matter what country or countries exist on the large island, it's name is Great Britain. Northern Ireland being in the UK or not can not affect the name of the large island :)

    19. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Basically like India but slightly better English skills and right on Europe's doorstep.

      We'll be a better tax haven than India too. I think the plan is something like this:
      1. Destroy local industry
      2. Invite companies to HQ here and pay no taxes whatsoever
      3. ????
      4. Profit!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    20. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sort of cuck self hating attitude would never be so widespread in the US.

      You are an embarrassment.

    21. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is simply not going to happen, not even 1% chance.

    22. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This site is too American focused for your comment to make sense to the majority of its readership.
      Maybe stick to The Guardian.

    23. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not only Northern Ireland, take a closer look at this map. You might see a certain trend in a part that already had a referendum concerning the separation from Britain before, and where the main reason to stay was the fear that if they split, they might be cast out of the EU.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Given that the only part that actually wanted to separate from the EU was England, "The British Islands" might well become nothing but a geographic term in the near future...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So ... Airstrip One has always been part of Oceania?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:Sounds about right by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think you give them too much credit. In May's case it's just:

      1. ????

      All she ever seems to say is meaningless gibberish like "Brexit means Brexit". Today we had the first hint that they know their position is extremely weak but still absolutely no hint of any kind of plan to get any of the stuff they seem to want.

      The most concrete proposal we have had was from Hammond, suggesting that we remodel ourselves as a tax haven but without the nice beaches.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Sounds about right by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Apple look simply to be pricing in the devaluation in Sterling that has occurred since the beginning of Brexit. I'm not sure anyone can find much to fault with that. The real question is how quickly Apple will move to reduce prices if/when the Pound recovers?

      As a developer with paid apps in the store, I get an email every single time Apple changes its prices anywhere in the world. Most of the time, some prices go up, some prices go down.

    28. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cuck' is so last year

    29. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please just stop. You have no idea what you're talking about and well out of your depth.
      England wasn't the only part of the UK that wanted to leave. Wales did too.
      Also a significant minority of people in NI and Scotland wanted to leave.
      Look at a map by constituency and you'll see the overwhelming majority of constituencies across the UK voted Leave.

    30. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Wow. Talk about fake news. And from the BBC, too, I really don't know who to believe anymore!

      Thanks AC for bringing us this nugget of truth.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Given that the only part that actually wanted to separate from the EU was England

      Wales wanted to separate as well, for some inexplicable reason.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    32. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Talk about fake news. And from the BBC, too, I really don't know who to believe anymore!

      I like how you (a) make shit up, then (b) post a link being smugly sarcastic about fake news that literally says the opposite of what you're saying.

      Thanks AC for bringing us this nugget of truth.

      Well indeed, it seems to be the truth that you are unable to handle given you didn't even bother looking at the link you posted. Or do you think this is fake news too:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    33. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I thought she'd read it, I'd send her a brief outline of the situation as shown below:
      1) We're fucked
      2) You're clueless
      3) Your party is clueless
      4) All the other parties are clueless
      5) We're fucked

    34. Re:Sounds about right by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's going to be confusing when Scotland is independent and Gibraltar is under joint Spanish rule. The soft borders with Scotland and Norther Ireland will be strange, presumably some kind of force field that repels immigrants but allows British citizens and select Scottish/Irish people to pass.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, of course not. This is the Wikipedia page of Wales. I do not question the existence of Wales.

      What exactly is the Wikipedia article supposed to tell me? What I found out after some digging is that 12.5% of the Welsh voted UKIP in the 2016 election. That's about as much as there is to be gleamed from the Wikipedia article concerning the Brexit. And even that was something I only found in one of the links provided in the article.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    36. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You said this:

      Given that the only part that actually wanted to separate from the EU was England

      You are simply flat-out wrong. Your "proof" was to show a map showing that both England and Wales voted leave.

      What exactly is the Wikipedia article supposed to tell me?

      That Wales exists. And that if you knew that, you wouldn't have posted a map showing that England and Wales voted leave in order to prove that only England wanted to leave.

      I look forwards to you not admitting your mistake.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    37. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So England AND Wales did want to separate. The map isn't that clear on Wales, but if you want to, fine. So Wales wanted to go, too.

      The point is that the United Kingdom might not stay so united far longer.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the numbers I bet more people in India speak and write English competently than here in Blighty!

    39. Re:Sounds about right by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Kind of the point was that you can't put the great back into Great Britain by the United Kingdom leaving the European Union.

      Simply put Great Britain can refer to one of two things. Firstly the largest island in the archipelago of over 6000 islands off the north west coast of Europe. Leaving or being in the EU has no effect on greatness of this Great Britain. It is the "greatest" by virtue of being the biggest of the British Isles. Noting aside that the Irish view this as a politically loaded but the reality is that is is an ancient Greek name for the archipelago so blame them.

      The other Great Britain was a political entity that came into being in 1707 with the Act of Union between England/Wales and Scotland. It ceased to exist over 200 years ago, specifically in 1801 with the Act of Union between Great Britain and Ireland. As it does not exist you cannot put the great back into it without ejecting Northern Ireland from the United Kingdom recreating Great Britain. This is an extremely unlikely scenario as if Northern Ireland where to leave the UK it is highly likely that Scotland would too. In fact the only thing likely to precipitate NI leaving the UK would be Scotland going first.

    40. Re:Sounds about right by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The real question is how quickly Apple will move to reduce prices if/when the Pound recovers?

      lol. How quick is "never"?

      I'm not sure if he's talking about Apple reducing prices or the Pound recovering.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    41. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      So England AND Wales did want to separate.

      *slow clap*

      Well done, you actually sort of admitted you made a mistake claiming ONLY England wanted to go.

      The map isn't that clear on Wales

      It's as clear on Wales as it is on Scotland.

      The point is that

      The point is that you were flat out, demonstrably incorrect. It's quite entertaining seeing you forced to concecde with the minimum possible grace :)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    42. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What the hell is your problem with me? You're the only person I know who can literally turn a molehill into a mountain for no other reason than to ... well, I don't even get the reason. So what the hell is your problem?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    43. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You are often loud and angry. Even when you're loud and angry about something you're very very clearly wrong about, you never reply with "oh shit I was wrong", or words to that effect, you just get louder and angrier.

      Try not doing that.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    44. Re:Sounds about right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Do I have to come to confession or will a "sorry, misinterpreted the map" do?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    45. Re:Sounds about right by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      That'll do.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  3. First world problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because people apparently can't function without apps on their phone, or even use it to place and receive calls and messages. You don't need apps to be happy!

    1. Re:First world problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Careful, you risk summoning the appy apps guy.

  4. The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the U.K.'s break from Europe, the U.S. has already begun grooming the country to be an extension of its markets, and politics. I think for every year that passes from now, services and goods, and their qualities, will more and more look like those offered in the U.S.

    If Scotland and Wales want to keep the quality of life as they know it, they had better vote to remain in the EU soon.

    1. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Wales was one of the most pro Brexit regions of the UK in the referendum, which might seem strange because they benefit more than most from EU grants and very few immigrants want to go there.

      Scotland was strongly anti-Brexit but it's too late for them to vote to stay in the EU. If they manage to swing another Indyref, it won't be in place before we've left the EU, so they'll need to reapply.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    2. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Wales was one of the most pro Brexit regions of the UK in the referendum, which might seem strange because they benefit more than most from EU grants and very few immigrants want to go there.

      It's doubly strange. Not only do they benefit the most from the EU, but Brexit was a plan by Tories for Tories, and the obvious side effect has been to give a lot of extra power to the Tory party. Historically the Tory party has not been good to Wales.

      I really don't get the mindset which concludes that giving a whole lot of extra power to a bunch of toffs who hate you, is somehow a good idea.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really so hard to understand that there a large number of people who think beyond percentage points and GDP figures?
      There is actually a whole lot more to life, y'know.

    4. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is not hard to understand. The original point is still relevant though - the people who voted for Brexit (or Trump, if you Americans want to join in) have given over power to a group with even less concern or understanding of the issues facing those voters than that which went before. Do you really think a Home Counties Tory MP has one iota of concern about the physical, financial and emotional well-being of an out-of-work miner or a second or third generation unemployed person from former industrial heartlands? (substitute "Home Counties MP" with "Billionaire/Millionaire ultra-capitalist" for the US context).

      The turkeys haven't exactly voted for Christmas, but they've definitely voted for those who can profit from the Christmas tradition,

    5. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know!!!! It's almost as if the feckless plebs voted for something on principle, rather than along party lines or for whoever would pad their back pocket.

      Of course as we metropolitan ubermensch well know, nobody north of the Watford gap has ever had a noble thought in their pitiful lives. This is so clearly an aberration we need to hold at least 3 or 4 more referenda until we get the correct result.

    6. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      So it's a point of principle to get boned by the Tories? How did that make sense?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This mate is why remain lost, and the pollsters, the politicians, the banks and the market speculators all got it so badly wrong.

    8. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is more like, YET AGAIN, the disenfranchised on the UK have been persuaded to vote for their further disenfranchisement. Look at the other pet topics of those in Vote Leave. Look at what else unifies them. Did you like the NHS? Yeah, shame about that.

    9. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were persuaded to vote in a Tory coup, and vote in the plotters. (Which didn't quite go to plan.)

      Leave voters got it wrong. Look at the wider policy positions of those who encouraged you to vote Leave. You have made the mistake and we all pay for it.

    10. Re:The U.S. is grooming the U.K. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This mate is why remain lost, and the pollsters, the politicians,

      So, remain lost because the leavers WANTED to take sides in battle of the Toffs? Tell me, which Eton toff did you back in the fight? Johnson or Cameron? You wanted to send the politicians a message by handing them more power, specifically giving a bunch of Tory Toffs precisely what they want?

      I think it's indeed fair to say I truly don't understand the mindset that it's somehow a point of principle to keep shoving even more silver spoons up the Tories uh... mouths.

      the banks and the market speculators all got it so badly wrong.

      You do realise Brexit hasn't happened yet, right?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  5. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Well that just makes no sense, whatsoever.

    [citation needed]

    its basically charging arbirtarily different prices in different regions and pocketing the difference.

    It costs different amounts of money just to do business in different regions. Why should the prices not reflect this? With their stronger consumer protection laws, it has to be more expensive to do business in the UK.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Corporate Arrogance strikes again. by geekmux · · Score: 0

    Numerical matching is doing nothing more than making the number 99 appear everywhere, as if currency conversions and other taxes are suddenly and magically irrelevant. I guess the only thing that's truly irrelevant is giving a shit about the impact.

    Apple sure has one hell of an arrogant way of defining courage. I'd respect them a lot more if they were just honest about the change and said "Fuck You, that's why."

    1. Re:Corporate Arrogance strikes again. by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      It's got nothing to do with corporate arrogance and everything to do with boosting sales numbers. The ".99" thing is psychological and is connected with how the optical cortex processes the sequence of numbers we see into a value that we then equate to. Apparently, enough extra people will purchase an item priced at $x.99 instead of ${x+1}.00 than is necesssary to offset the $0.01 loss of profits, and where people are becoming aware of this marketing technique the simple trick of using .98 supposedly tricks the brain and brings the sale numbers right back up again.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Corporate Arrogance strikes again. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      It's got nothing to do with corporate arrogance and everything to do with boosting sales numbers. The ".99" thing is psychological and is connected with how the optical cortex processes the sequence of numbers we see into a value that we then equate to. Apparently, enough extra people will purchase an item priced at $x.99 instead of ${x+1}.00 than is necesssary to offset the $0.01 loss of profits, and where people are becoming aware of this marketing technique the simple trick of using .98 supposedly tricks the brain and brings the sale numbers right back up again.

      "Price tiers on the App Store are set internationally on the basis of several factors, including currency exchange rates, business practices, taxes, and the cost of doing business,"

      According to TFA, this has nothing to do with psychological factors of selling cheap shit to the masses. At all.

      The ultimate factor driving price is demand. When you have plenty of that, you can clearly afford to be arrogant.

  7. 80 rupees? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    That's only four red rupees. It's rather easy to get even with the wooden sword.

    1. Re:80 rupees? by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      LOL, I was just coming here to say that ;-)

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  8. I see by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    _That's_ why revenues soared 40% as they told us in the other article here.

  9. Re: UK costs will numerically match those of the U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really think this change has anything to do with their actual business cost, I have a bridge you may be interested in.

  10. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "numerically match" is the new phrase of the moment, presumably. It's laughable.

  11. Re: UK costs will numerically match those of the U by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If you really think this change has anything to do with their actual business cost, I have a bridge you may be interested in.

    Oh yes, yes I think it does. I think the former pricing had nothing to do with actual business cost, but what the market would bear during the introductory period.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Informative

    its basically charging arbirtarily different prices in different regions and pocketing the difference. I am sure a US app maker will still get paid in USD.

    As an app developer, I can correct your incorrect assumptions.

    Apps on the app store come in different "price tiers" from free, to $0.99, to $1.99 etc. Apple translates these prices for countries other than the USA. Mostly this is done by multiplying or dividing by the exchange rate, adding VAT where necessary, and rounding to a nice even amount (if they calculated the correct price should be £2.04 or £1.94, then the actual price will be £1.99, for example).

    When the customer pays, Apple removes the VAT which they pay to the tax office of that country, takes their 30% or 15% cut, and then converts the money into the currency of the developer, and that's the amount paid.

    Apple also tries to keep the prices constant for long times - they could have done the UK change six months ago, so for six months UK citizens actually got a rebate.

    The users pay a fair price - each user pays an amount so that the same money ends up in the developer's pockets. So users are not "fucked". And developers get roughly the same amount of money wherever you buy an app. Right now, developers got 20% less if you bought in the UK instead of the USA, for example, and that has now been corrected.

  13. Raising prices in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is one of the markets where they are at par with the Windows Phones. Granted that the latter has taken a body blow with the end of the Lumia, but they're not gonna increase market share much that way

  14. Re: UK costs will numerically match those of the U by iapetus · · Score: 1

    Correction: users *are* fucked. Just not by Apple in this case.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  15. Shame about turkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life was hard enough for gays anyway without having to pay more for gay phone apps

  16. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Wait, all this is doing is shifting VAT and taxes from the developer's burden to the purchaser?

    Why the fuck did the article not say this? I already know why, because making the taxes fair would not generate outrage and clicks. I have been duped.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  17. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by rajkiran_g · · Score: 1

    Apps on the app store come in different "price tiers" from free, to $0.99, to $1.99 etc. Apple translates these prices for countries other than the USA. Mostly this is done by multiplying or dividing by the exchange rate, adding VAT where necessary, and rounding to a nice even amount (if they calculated the correct price should be £2.04 or £1.94, then the actual price will be £1.99, for example).

    In what plane of existence is 1.99 "a nice even amount"?

  18. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

    No - there is no change in where the burden of taxation/VAT lies. Apple have always incorporated sales tax into app store prices.

    This is a correction owing to currency devaluations.

    The UK Pound is now worth about 25% less than it was six months ago when compared to the US Dollar, therefore they've corrected the GBP prices of apps to reflect the current exchange rate.

  19. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Ok I guess I am confused. I though the article says that they are "synchronizing prices" such that a .99 USD app in the US will cost .99 GPB in the UK.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  20. Re:UK costs will numerically match those of the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when is £1.99 'even' ? it's and advertising/marketing price.