Slashdot Mirror
Tech Firm Creates Trump Monitor For Stock Markets (reuters.com)
randomErr quotes a report from Reuters: London-based fintech firm Trading.co.uk is launching an app that will generate trading alerts for shares based on Donald Trump social media comments. Keeping one eye on the U.S. President-elect's personal Twitter feed has become a regular pastime for the fund managers and traders. Trump knocked several billion off the value of pharmaceutical stocks a week ago by saying they were "getting away with murder" with their prices. Comments earlier this week on China moved the dollar and a pair of December tweets sent the share prices of Lockheed Martin and Boeing spiraling lower. That plays to the growing group of technology startups that use computing power to process millions of messages posted online every day and generate early warnings on when shares are likely to move. Trading.co.uk chief Gareth Mann said the Trump signal generator used artificial intelligence technology to differentiate between tweets or other messages that, for example, just mention Boeing and those liable to move markets.
The really worrying thing is that he is so easy to trigger. His favourite news site is breitbart, and Twitter is largely unfiltered. How long until someone engineers a stock crash for their own monetary benefit?
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Stock value these days is speculative, and has virtually nothing to do with tangible value.
When pointing out common sense things (Lockheed asking $800,000 per round for a gun is too much) or (Pharmaceutical companies are charging more than the average american can afford) causes stock prices to plummet - they were overvalued.
Then again, statistically rounded - 100% of trading is HFT and is a scam anyway, so....it doesn't matter. Again.
Wait for Trump to say something stupid that knocks a chunk of money off of a stock, wait a few hours for it to crash, buy low, and sell it after a week when the price rebounds. Once again, the ultra-wealthy with their high-frequency traders get richer, and normal people's retirement funds get poorer....
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
I just assumed he was doing this so his buddies can short the stocks
Hillary's practically a saint compared to this fucking Cheeto.
I doubt it's luck. I'm sure he has some very skillful lawyers and accountants working for him, and they make all the deals. He's just the brand name.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
cry = buy......shit = sell.
If you followed Trump at all before the election, you'd realize that Trump is actually quite smart, and really does understand not only how the world works but is especially excellent at negotiation and hiring good talent.
Some of the things he's saying over Twitter are calibrated to make him look dumb, so that people underestimate him. It's funny to me that people say Trump has a huge ego, therefore he needs attention from press and media... it's because Trump has a huge ego that none of that matters to him. He is ecstatic that people continue to fall for the lie Trump is dumb, because it makes it so easy for him to move forward with whatever he wants to do and surprise everyone.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Traders will soon learn that he fires his mouth off about everything but rarely backs it up, and changes his mind about 20 times a week. They'll stop reacting to what he says because it is just noise.
No, it's what the gp said: "born rich" was his preparation, and "born rich" was his opportunity. You and me should have been smart enough to plan ahead like that.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
1. As a senator, Hillary voted for the Iraq war.
2. As secretary of state, she supported the intervention in Libya.
3. She advocated for deeper American involvement in Syria.
All of these have been unmitigated disasters for America, so her judgement doesn't appear to be so good.
I expect Trump to be a terrible president, but his preference for non-interventionism in foreign affairs is one of his few good points. Another good point about his presidency is the entertainment value. Popcorn sales should go way up. Hillary would have been dull.
just take two golden showers and call me in the morning.
Son in law at least is already preparing to cover the paper trail.
1) "Hey dad, China is dragging their feet on the new hotel. They said you aren't cool any more."
2) "YEARRRRGH!!! TRUMP SMASH!!!"
3) tweet
4) profit!
It's not my fault you weren't smart enough and Iworkhard enough to bribe the ovarian lottery.
Trump says X, traders jump on positions that would benefit from X to try and get out in front. However other than the speculative betting there isn't much movement. Then X doesn't happen, so there is no long term movement. The traders disengage from their positions trying to take as little loss as possible.
This happens over and over and more will learn that acting just loses you money. It's why markets don't do fuck-all in response to Alex Jones. It isn't like his message isn't out there for the world to see, and actually more widely watched than I can fathom, but they don't believe anything will happen based on it so trying to get a first mover advantage can't happen.
You only gain an advantage by getting in first if the move happens. If it doesn't, at best maybe you can get out without a loss but usually you are going to take a hit to some degree. Thus you act only on those things that are likely to generate a move.
Traditionally, things the president said would qualify. However Trump is anything but traditional. He shoots his mouth off all the time, regularly contradicts himself, and changes his mind often.
So Trump has riled the markets by, so far: criticizing an overpriced aircraft, and being the first Republican to not kiss the butt of the pharma lobby.
I'm hoping for some more Wall Street action like this.
Unless that tweet turns into a punitive regulatory action, then you've just lost a chunk of your savings.
This is a good point. We've gotten used to the Prince Jeoffrey phase of this drama, but winter is coming. The King Jeoffrey phase will be much different.
In less than 24 hours he goes from being President-Elect Trump to President* Trump, and those tweets might come with executive orders attached. (Twitter is gonna support that, they don't know it yet, but they'll do it soon, believe me.)
*illegitimately
Rhetoric is not reality. All you've been paying attention to is the rhetoric.
Nor is it yours apparently. Trump is most known for being involved in the building of several large buildings, not for being a madman. Sure, his behavior is eccentrically self-promoting, but other than that his behavior isn't noted for madness. I can predict that one of his next moves is to claim credit for the medical bill that the Republican Congress hashes out that he will claim his administration submitted.
that someone who has no clue how to run a business or deal with financials can have this much sway
he's gotten lucky all through life. i've seen other wealthy people like this, dumb as a box of rocks and no clue how anything really works in the world, yet they have a ton of money and got lucky owning and running a company that somehow hasn't gone under yet.
The real amazement is that someone who has 'no clue how to run a business or deal with financials' is a billionaire. I don't either - how do I pull that off?
He's known most for being the host of a reality TV show. Trump voters don't live in a place with a Trump Tower. He only builds those in places where people vote Democrat.
You are welcome on my lawn.
I don't live anywhere near he has built a building. I also don't watch his show. I just happen to recall that he is involved with getting his name put on buildings and either leasing or owning like a condominium parts of them, more clearly and frequently than I remember that he does some show somewhere. I am 40 and have lived mainly in the middle column of the country, except for one year in Virginia Beach in the 12th grade, which was quite an interesting experience. This life may have oriented me towards thinking about his buildings, however, and I don't know how much is replicated in others. I find you have a track record of exceptionally good and exceptionally bad posts, btw.
The Chinese respond to rhetoric, but I have found that the Oriental are better than the Occidental in distinguishing between rhetoric and reality, so they are nowhere near acting in a cold war behavior.
While I can have no idea of what your true knowledge of the situation is, your post is the act of one who, whether pretending or for real, has only been paying attention to the rhetoric.
Regardless of whether Trump is a "madman" or a "loose cannon" either of the two terms describe too wide a field to be relevant to the issue of war, nuclear or otherwise. So for that matter, is "level-headed" You choose terms that encompass too wide a field to be relevant to anything then claim to have superior reasoning capabilities. You may be able to think logically enough to be useful in whatever field you apply it in with the relevant data, but your ability to figure out what data is relevant outside that field is sorely lacking. Trump's behavior has far less hidden variables than Hillary's. Both have provided plenty of evidence this is true. Therefore people have more options they are aware of when dealing with Trump.
Does Hillary saying she has a public position and a private position mean nothing to you?
Some eccentric approaches can lead to war and some will not. A further refinement is needed before you can logically declare a given eccentric approach will lead to war. Eccentric means uncommon, not unpredictable or even unstable.
A "Science" degree, is incomplete to describe a degree. You have Associates, Bachelors, Masters and Dotorates of either Science or the Arts in various disciplines. Law and Humanities are both disciplines.
Having a public and private position in no way is evidence for or against being more capable than someone who is unable to adjust their position, and in fact you can be someone who is unable to adjust your position and have any number of public and private facing positions. They can all be completely wrong. Even if you can adjust, that doesn't even mean the adjustments are right, thus the backlash against supposed flip-flopping, which is generally irrational, but has roots in a rational problem.
Trump is someone that gets people to make decisions for him then claims them as his own. Like with the Republican Congress' medical insurance implementation, he will have people working on solutions regarding things that have to do with war. Trump has a track record with buildings that he is involved with things that actually get built. Of his other businesses, while some failed, it appears that while all of them were operating, they at least delivered a product. Trump has a track record of delivering things that people want at least a little bit, and are uninterested in usually at worse. Hillary deliveres things that people express strong preferences that they would not have wanted to be delivered.
I think I prefer the Chinese Dragon to Team America. If you play your cards right, the Great Firewall of China is porous. There have been stories where plenty of researchers say they would prefer the Great Firewall be lowered in their case, but they say they do jump through the hoops to get to the information they need, so it is possible. No matter who has been doing what, the conceit of 1984 has never been the case. Plenty of self-help books declare that if you aren't doing something you enjoy it's your own fault.
He will only engage in war if it becomes popular. There's more chance of intervention in the Israel-Palestinian conflict than in Syria. His statements about oil are what's been the popular opinion about the spoils of war since war was a thing. His statements about the spoils of war were provisional about there being war in the first place and was not necessarily an endorsement of committing the wars in the first place. It also was not his biggest complaint.
His biggest complaint was a lack of jobs followed by statements surrounding immigrants, illegal and H1B's mainly, taking jobs that he thinks should have gone to people already here. Just about anything else was distant.
When "rude gestures" are made by military vessels it is a military engagement, and not just "rude gestures".
When Trump says why can't we use nuclear weapons, it is mainly posturing to figure out why we can't use the threat of nuclear weapons as a bargaining tactic.
However, any weapon in our arsenal will have a desired effect, and nuclear weapons just seem scary. I am somewhat bothered that the main reason we don't use nuclear weapons is because they have been used on civilian populations when they were used and a use case on using it on military hasn't been made.
Based on Trump's history, he boast of facts not yet in hand, but gets options based on fact before acting, so when it comes time he will get options from people who do know things that may be better or worse informed than the generals. He does tend to make decisions that at the very least don't have many detractors. People may find his decisions uninteresting, but Trump detractors are upset Trump does not share their philosopy rather than any one decision he made.
Considering all the bad ideas about Trump floating around and paraded in these comments, yours is refreshingly accurate. You should be modded up 5, insightful, though considering all the above I mentioned, I have doubts it will happen.
I wonder what a world where that is considered normal rather than corruption would be like. My speculations are all over the map from bad to good given the results of capitalism in general.
So it's artificial intelligence vs natural stupidity...?
I knew it'd come to that someday.
Non-Linux Penguins ?
So far, Trump tweets mean things or threatens to sue when someone does something he doesn't like, and if you continue doing something Trump doesn't like he will tweet mean things or threaten to sue again. He rarely ever sues as I understand it, and there are plenty of people who just moved on to other things but didn't back down on the original situation. That is a far different tactic than someone who would easily use nukes would take, like for example people who cross you turning up dead. I can't say for certain that Hillary has been involved with people winding up dead, but to put a new spin on an old campaign slogan, in your heart you know she might. Now where is your real evidence for Trump quickly actually using the nuclear option, and even if then where it would be significantly worse than using conventional weapons. Nukes are scary, but a rational examination of the situation can see the use of nukes without significant retaliation. What no one is asking is what if we are better off using nukes against a select group of enemies? Although Trump did field a similar question.
We had stupid choices for president. I didn't vote as none of them shared my values very much. Hillary shares some of the tactics my family is known to employ, but she is a rank amature in comparison. This is my brother: https://www.linkedin.com/in/oc... I am sort of a black sheep in the family as I have little to show for my life. I am a bit like the ruler of the universe in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"
I find that when people don't understand what I say, it usually turns out to be due to ignorance on their part. I also find it is generally the case. So in the future, you should probably lead with it's your own ignorance to blame.
To put what I said in blander terms. I said that I might like greater Chinese influence in the world as opposed to what America has been doing in the world. China has a system that prevents its citizens from accessing materials the Chinese government doesn't want them to see because it might cause opposition to the government. This system is generally referred to as "The Great Firewall of China". However, it has been communicated, even right here on this very site, that if someone really wants to access said materials, a way can be found. There is a book written by George Orwell called "1984". In it, people are persecuted for doing things that they find enjoyable that the state frowns upon. That is not the rationale for the Chinese system, and people are still free enough to continuously find things they find enjoyable. There are books called self-help books. Among them are books that say they will help you enjoy life more. One of the major elements in such books is that you simply don't know what the book will teach you and in so learning the contents within you will enjoy life better, so the reason you weren't enjoying life so much before is simply your fault.
If you still have trouble understanding any of this, point out specific details and your best guess as to what it might mean and I may be able to help you understand further. But it is simply your fault you don't understand.
It's over. No point rabbiting on about warmonger Hillary wanting to kill Ghadaffi (just like Reagan) while peaceful Trump put up a tent for him in his back yard.
A really bizzare thing is getting pop-up ads (dunno how it made it past the blocker) about "video proof - how Hillary rigged the election". She lost months ago - who are the fucking tools paying money for this shit?
This is where we disagree. Clinton keeps her real positions private. This makes her unpredictable. My whole family are masters at the private-public game and my father is an attorney that for some reason prefers to sell children's clothes at Macy's. He also took off with those of us children that belong to him. My mom had another child after divorcing him. I have a sister that died, a brother who seems rather successful but married a Chinese woman, a half-sister that teaches, but has married and divorced several times, and a mother with a Bachelor's degree in psychology that drives for Uber. That isn't predictable.
To be charitable, he might be referred to as "hard bargaining".
Eccentric is hardly a good euphemism for "volatile". You fail at English. And volatile covers a wide range of actions as well. covering saying mean things to people to all-out warfare. And Trump is the saying mean things to people sort of person, not the all-out warfare type. And volatility is a make up of Hillary as well, as evidenced by her actions on going to war as Secretary of State. There are problems with the word, volitile as well. It can mean quick to anger or unpredictable. You are an utter failure at word choices.
You continue to illustate your lack of understanding of things outside your skill-set by thinking that talking like a person who is uninformed about how degrees work is actually an illustration of how much you know. Utter failure.
Now as you said, you might not read this, but i find it might be helpful to illustrate to others why your behavior should be a textbook example on how not to communicate well.
As did every single Republican and most of the Democrats.
As President, Reagan bombed Libya.
So did McCain and many many others.
Now she doesn't matter. It's those many many others who wanted to act the same way who are still in power are the ones you should be taking to task unless you don't care about being seen as hopelessly partisan and amoral.
Get back to me in a year and let's see if you think that entertainment was worth it.
The Chinese are more interested in the personal than the position. They are more likely to take Trump's insults as his word instead of dismissing his bullshit as "locker room banter".
Imperial Japan was different in a lot of ways, but the lesson of rattling sabres at them too many times resulting in the Pearl Harbor attack still applies. What we see as bluffs and bluster can be seen as serious threats that must be addressed for fear of being seen as being weak domestically and being in danger of being replaced.
If (ok, being stupid here, it has to be "when") Trump insults Xi personally then Xi has to take some sort of action or he'll soon lose his hold on power as someone else steps up to replace the "weak" leader. I can see it escalating to a cold war and proxy war level very quickly. Sadly that trust fund baby draft dodger just does not have a fucking clue about it.
Hillary was way more of a war monger
...than who? The actual warmongers of this world? Despite all the involvement of the US in global politics, there's never been a short supply of regional crazies. The idea that Hillary is/was a warmonger is an idea from the bottom of your liquor bottle. The same goes for Trump, actually.
Ezekiel 23:20
All of these have been unmitigated disasters for America, so her judgement doesn't appear to be so good.
That only tells us she wouldn't be a better pacifist than Obama and Bush Jr. Not that she'd end the world as we know it, which is apparently what a lot of Trump supporters want you to think.
Ezekiel 23:20
The real amazement is that someone who has 'no clue how to run a business or deal with financials' is a billionaire. I don't either - how do I pull that off?
The best way to pull it off is to have a parent from whom you inherit many billions of assets. That way you can afford to lose a few billion here and there through incompetence and still be a billionaire.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
So when Trump says in public that the US should seize Iraqi oil fields for itself, it's just "rhetoric", but when Clinton doesn't say that she intends to start WW III, if you're a Trump supporter, that's exactly what she wants to do?
Ezekiel 23:20
Sure looks like his stance on vaccines is going to have an associated bodycount. But hey, it's all about the popcorn.
I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
Another good point about his presidency is the entertainment value. Popcorn sales should go way up. Hillary would have been dull.
Right. Because entertainment value is what we should be looking for in the most powerful person in the world. /sarcasm
Seriously, isn't that what you Americans have the Kardashians for?
So is Ronald McDonald.
You are welcome on my lawn.
If you invested your hard earned money instead of buying an iPod, iPhone or iPad (when they came out) , into Apple stock, you'd be able to buy all three today, and have money left over.
Back in the early 80s my grandparents bought $100 worth of Apple stock. They promptly forgot about it as Apple didn't pay out dividends for years. All of a sudden a couple years ago they got a check in the mail from Apple once they started paying out again. Turns out their stock had been split a few times and ended up owning about $20k worth of shares that they sold off. Not bad for a $100 investment. If only they could have been able to afford $1000 worth of stock back then, but my grandfather was a college basketball coach and not making all that much money.
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
There isn't a cold war on the horizon unless China keeps pushing it's one china policy and tries to prevent traffic from going through the South China Seas. Vietnam, India, South Korea and Japan are extremely concerned about this. The Philippines I don't know. Their position has been changing.
Trade war is not going to happen. It will hurt both sides too much. China has been devaluating their currency in order to keep exports strong. They have been limiting imports. Trump has been pushing back (so what).
Trade War. Cold War. Nuclear War. grow up people.
If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
yep, because all other wars went so well for the USA and were always voted by both sides...
by the way, how will he "destroy ISIL"? by twitter?
Higuita
It's amazing how well you can do when you have daddy's money. Based on most calculations I have read, he would be twice as rich if he had just put it in the bank.
http://www.moneytalksnews.com/...
He has done nothing. Exactly that. and that is the point. The problem of face is a valid one, but the Chinese control of information within their nation is one reason why they won't have a problem with having to save face to their countrymen. I admit that I could be wrong on that though, and the reply by dbIII goes into decent detail about what could go wrong.
The problem of face is a valid one, but the Chinese control of information within their nation is one reason why they won't have a problem with having to save face to their countrymen. I admit that I could be wrong on that though.
The situation the Japanese faced was more than a matter of saber rattling, though. https://www.bing.com/search?q=... returns some nifty explanations of all that was going on, including https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
his tax evasion
If you have evidence of him evading taxes, you should contact the IRS, as it is, they have audited him ever year for a while and found no evidence of your accusation. You might be able to make a huge difference if you can bring this evidence forward.
As for Clinton, conspiracy theories about Pizzagate, Clinton Foundation, and World War 3.
Wow, just wow. You seem to have forgotten dodging the records act, having classified information on a home server, and encouraging aides to commit a felony by removing classification markings from classified documents. Oh well, Trump is so horrible in comparison...because you don't like him.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Sadly that trust fund baby draft dodger just does not have a fucking clue about it.
Did the trust fund baby draft dodger Bill Clinton have a better clue in your mind?
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Did I miss some incredible news? Did Trump launch a nuclear warhead?
how many nuclear warheads Hillary unleashed on an unsuspecting world while she was Secretary.
The same number that Trump has unleashed.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Bill Clinton for President of the Galaxy?
The President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it.
- HHGTTG
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
No - read stuff by Christopher Hitchens for a bit of a rundown on Bill Clinton's failings. Hitchens liked Democrats but saw that as no reason to go easy on Clinton
Why the fuck do things degenerate into naive shouting for teams whenever something related to politics is mentioned here?
It is other people in the top of the Party that he has to worry about and they have the same access to outside information.
Yes, like all analogies one thing is only similar but not identical to the other thing, and I didn't want to stir up an argument about US foreign policy of the time by going into detail (especially since years ago I talked to an old Korean who grew up during the time of Imperial Japanese occupation). I used it as an analogy because the USA was not prepared for the consequences of what Imperial Japan saw as provocation - hand in an ants nest without wearing gloves territory. I'm not questioning the validity of the actions just referring to the surprise when a response happened.
Funny, last I checked, it was not starting trouble with you to point out your errors, and to tell you to back off of people that you are stalking. If you would like, I could have the police come by and show you how stalking is not something that is appropriate online or off.
I find it funny that you think you shot down anything when you seem to have missed the side of the barn with your shots. I replied, I provided the references to other conversations we have had previously, you are the one who is scared to admit when you have been wrong in the past, not I. But go ahead and keep stalking me, and spouting racist nonsense against some third party from Twitter who isn't me.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
As in science, all it takes is one example to disprove a theory, and I posted a link to it.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Um, WTF are you spouting off about? You seem to think I am the one harassing you as you are posting calling me the n word (which is blocked by /.) around 10 times? When have I harassed or stalked you? I pass up numerous opportunities to reply to you every day. You seem to confuse me getting tired of your stalking other people as being the same as stalking you.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Already repeatedly pointed you to that, why do it yet again?
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
As I have repeatedly explained to you, I AM NOT A PROGRAMMER. No matter how often you ask for my programs, it just makes me laugh, as you seem to think only programmers contribute to technology. I have also explained that I like not being in jail, so I won't and can't show you what I have done. As all you do is sit around your house, I understand the lack of understanding in that some people are bound by contracts not to talk about what they do for a living.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
That is nice, at the time I was in a different job. Should I point out that you said you would stop trolling me as well?
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
It seems you might have a reading comprehension issue, have you ever been diagnosed?
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Yeah, so you weren't harassing raymorris? Do you often have problems with the truth? That can be diagnosed.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
LOL, keep grabbing those straws. Your software was marked malware, you act like the typical malware author, you refuse to release source code, like a malware author. If it quacks like a duck...
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Sticks and stones little one.
HAHAHAHA, I need to leave you, the biggest harasser on Slashdot, alone? What drugs are you on, and where does one obtain them?
Do you really think I care if you know my home city? After all, you publish your address in your software begging for handouts from people who use it.
So, please, come and see me, then it will be Assault (above), and Battery. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Yes, diagnosed. You have shown over and over that there is something wrong there. Others have suggested possible diagnosis, and you always try to claim that they aren't your psychiatrist. Perhaps you should revisit that clean bill of health, as it is obvious that you have huge glaring mental issues.
To start, I expect you cannot in any way resist replying to every one of my replies with more of your claiming of have won the argument without making any points at all.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
That right there proves me right. Thank you.
https://slashdot.org/comments....
Now, as to your drivel; no one who posts on the internet is talking behind your back unless they are posting to a board you have no access to. This is just more of your disorders coming out. As for lying, you are the kind of it, so I guess you would spot it, but what does that have to do with harassing and stalking him to try and point out his perceived lies?
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Donald J. Trump
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
LOL...as if. I just have to say, the tears are delicious though. You can't stand to not know who I am since I have so thoroughly thrashed you intellectually.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Did you ever actually learn grammar when you were in school? I can already see you never learned logic, as declaring your win, and other's liars kind of requires some kind of evidence, which you never provide...interestingly enough.
Keep shouting to the rafters about my "assburgers" as it just makes you look ignorant. You don't seem to understand what Asperger's syndrome was, and that you are making fun of an autistic person who was made fun of their whole life for being different. You can't make a dent in my confidence, nor make my day bad, so just give it up. You sound worse than the jocks making fun of us nerds because they don't get us.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
What was that? All I could hear was more quacking.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
I am sure you can find live pussy in your local strip joint, or on the nearest red light district street corner. Good luck nailing any of that pussy though.
As far as where I live, why should I let someone know who is commiting assault right at this moment by threatening to "settle this in person" as if he is some kind of tough guy.
As far as one dimensional, are you projecting? I did many things, not just tech related. I am a second degree brown belt in Tae Kwon Do, I worked in the drama program at school, I even played sports! But I guess you are so good at projecting, I must be the one who didn't do anything in high school. Also, I never got in a fight, because I know better than to pick stupid fights with stupid people who are in hitting range.
If you took logic in school, they should have flunked you, because you're "winning" attitude is pathetic, you don't even make an argument, just declare victory and act like the other person "ran" away from your terrible points.
As for impersonating the president, it is my prerogative.
Here's my address, come see me big tough guy:
935 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20535
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
Wow, you have hurt my feelings by calling me all those terrible names. I wonder myself how a sociopath like you lives with yourself every day as well, but I get along just fine thank you.
Why would I tell someone who is committing assault against me where I live? Do you advertise your address to people you know have threatened to bodily harm you? Assault is when you threaten to harm someone, as you have now repeatedly done. You can try and claim that you haven't, but it doesn't change the legal implications of the threats you are throwing about. NO ONE on a public board is posting behind your back, that sounds like paranoid schizophrenia, you should have that looked at. If we are posting on a public board, it is right in front of your freaking face, not behind your back. Behind your back would be us emailing back and forth about how much you screw up all the time.
Why would I call the cops? I am letting you hang yourself with all the rope you need. When you do significant crimes, I will be sure to drop some anonymous tips, which is all that is needed to have you committed for observation.
Ruin your reputation? As if you didn't do that to yourself by making significant technical blunders.
PS, keep projecting there, I am not the one who made a career out of lying. You act like you are the peak of technical knowledge when you make basic errors in networking and security. You just don't like when people point out your lies, and instead try to shout them down because you think it makes you look professional and knowledgable to act like an asshole online.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
I feel bad for you. You are so delusional you can't even see your bullshit anymore. I have answered this on numerous occasions, yet you keep repeating it like somehow the facts will change. I won't back down, your dodging of facts will not become the new facts.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
I made no mistake. Just because you conveniently forgot the conversation does not mean it didn't happen. I have already pointed you to it previously, and continuously asking for it again just makes you look like a deaf person. You are just making a fool of yourself yet again, so please, keep it up.
APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?