Slashdot Mirror


Trump Trades in Android Phone For Secret Service-Approved Device (cnet.com)

Who's got two thumbs and a Secret Service-approved phone to tweet from? On arriving in Washington on Thursday ahead of his inauguration, Donald Trump has handed in his Android device in exchange for an unidentified locked-down phone, according to Associated Press. From a report: The phone comes with a new number that is known only to a limited number of people. This marks a big change for Trump, who's frequently on the line with friends, business contacts, reporters, foreign leaders and politicians. Barack Obama was the first president to use a mobile device approved by security agencies because of hacking concerns. Initially he had a heavily modified BlackBerry and later switched to another phone that had most features totally disabled. He was not known to use it for making or receiving calls, but it was one of few devices that had access to the @POTUS Twitter account.

34 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. If they're smart... by Notabadguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they're smart it will have been a toy phone. He can beep-boop-beep on it to his heart's content. Bonus points if pressing the buttons makes a pleasant sound each time.

    1. Re: If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Last day to bash Trump! Then he will deport you.

    2. Re:If they're smart... by CajunArson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!

      You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    3. Re:If they're smart... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not even a USA citizen, and I feel like you since
      - he did nothing yet
      - he was elected.

      Perhaps you'll see me hate him in a few weeks, but not yet lol

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    4. Re:If they're smart... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah Trump's just SO STUPID!

      You are SO ORIGINAL with that zinger! Damn, are you up for a Pulitzer?

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      I don't think he's stupid at all. I just think he's a boor and a con man.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    5. Re:If they're smart... by Notabadguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

      Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

      At least with him, there's a chance.

    6. Re:If they're smart... by Mycroft-X · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not even a USA citizen, and I feel like you since
      - he did nothing yet
      - he was elected.

      One Nobel Peace Prize, coming right up!

    7. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, because the electorate is more stupid?

    8. Re:If they're smart... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If he can drone strike enough people, perhaps he can too ;)

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    9. Re: If they're smart... by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because his supports have an IQ of a retarded ferret?

      You'd think that after ~15-17 years of identity politics, labeling people as "racists, nazis, retards, bigots, sexists, etc, etc, etc" that the left would learn something. Seems to be a NOPE on that one. And it's only cost them in the US ~1200 seats of power. It's only cost them brexit. It's likely going to cost them Germany and France too. And with the shit that Trudeau and leftists are now pulling in Canada? I wouldn't be surprised if we see the death of the Liberal Party within the next 5 years. And I'll bet that instead of being introspective, people on the left are gonna double down. Just like the democrats in the US are, just like political parties, and media are in the US and Europe.

      Just a FYI: The left are overrun with extremists. Whether it be people who claim they're anti-racists being racists, claiming to be anti-bigots, while engaging in bigotry. Engaging in general shitty behavior that enables a literal cultural desert because "cultural appropriation." Engaging in sexist or anti-sexual liberation ideologies. It doesn't matter. You are, where the right was ~25 years ago, when you were out there screaming about the "crazy religious right-wing nuts." Get rid of the crazies, dump the identity politics. In short: Get your shit in order.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a 3d map of the vote by county. Pretty interesting. http://metrocosm.com/election-...

      The "popular" vote is due to just a few counties, which happen to also be safe places for illegals, and highly alleged to be corrupt. We don't know how much voter fraud happened in those places, but it is likely non-zero.

      Being smart, Trump knew that these were no-win states, so he didn't waste any time or money campaigning there. He was going after the win rather than the popular vote. Considering Trumps relatively low campaign costs, he went about it wisely. I hope he handles his presidential decisions this well.

    11. Re:If they're smart... by quantaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes...yes he is. And his opponent wasn't a boring public servant. She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

      Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

      At least with him, there's a chance.

      No you elected an idiot because you are an idiot.

      Clinton had flaws, but none of the things you mentioned were among them (with the possible exception of your weirdly sexist comment about her breasts).

      --
      I stole this Sig
    12. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Incidentally, if he's so stupid, how come Hillary isn't being inaugurated today?

      Partly because when SHE had the opportunity to hand in HER phone for a government one, she refused. Which I find hilarious.

      The major reason I knew I, personally, could never vote for her was when (via leaked emails) it became clear that the reason she was mad at government IT and decided to use her own email server was because they wouldn't let her use her phone inside a SCIF. A SCIF is a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. The entire point to it is that it's safe from eavesdropping, and therefore is shielded from cell reception (or any kind of reception - it's basically a giant Faraday cage).

      And Clinton was trying to force them to let her use her personal phone inside of it.

      The actual reason she lost, her complete lack of touch with workers, is just gravy. But the fact that she was the type of over-demanding "VP of marketing" type who demanded IT completely ignore security was enough to make me hate her, ignoring the mountain of other reasons. And, of course, her complete disdain for security practices and those who set them up and enforce them then came back to bite her in the ass when her campaign's email was hacked, multiple times. So that was nice too.

      Am I happy we wound up with Trump? No. That's a problem in the Primaries process, where other, better candidates were weeded out because despite the fact that the majority of the GOP hates Trump, they weren't able to settle on a single candidate. In a proper voting system like IRV, Trump never would have won the nomination. Am I happier that the harpy will never see the White House? Hell yes!

    13. Re:If they're smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would argue that he has done something already. Those tweets about the trade deals, disparaging the UN/NATO, etc, are already having an affect on our foreign policy. This is evident by the moves that China has been making to enact their own trade deal as well as countries like Germany signaling that they are unhappy. He needs to realize that all of those off the cuff remarks do really mean something in the geo-political world because they signal his intentions. This bullshit about let's wait and see what he does is just that, when a man shows you who he is believe him the first time.

    14. Re:If they're smart... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's not him, but all the FUD created by medias lol.
      Country was already divided, since it's voters that votes, not Trump.
      All I just wanna say is -> wait and see! If he does bad, then protest all you want and kick he's sorry ass out of there, but please wait to see what he's going to do, and how.

      We, in Canada, got one interesting guy which love to selfy and every media ""loved"" him... we're stacking record debt since then...
      I guess many US and worldwide big shots are just playing with all your minds via media. Just calm down, wait and see for yourself.

      TDLR : Don't "think emotionally".

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    15. Re:If they're smart... by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      The reason many didn't get behind her was not because she was boring but because of her well earned reputation. When given the choice between a pompous, arrogant, jackass or a slimy, deceitful, politician America choose the arrogant jackass.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    16. Re: If they're smart... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      You still don't get it. People don't label Trump and some of his supporters as racists and bigots.

      Going by your reasoning, then democrats and people who support them are pedophiles right? After all, there are so many of them that have deep links to people like Epstein. And there's just so many articles on leftwing media sources, sites and so on in the defense of pedophiles, child porn, and so on. See how easy that works? Haven't learned a single fucking thing.

      They ARE racists and bigots, it's just a statement of fact, ...

      Repeatedly saying that, doesn't make it true. Then again, your definition of "racist and bigots" seems to be anybody who refuses to agree with your political ideology. Which is why the left is right there, screaming no platform. Or attacking, assaulting, or violently assaulting people for having a different point of view. It's why they're organized into groups, it's why those big "left wing" groups keep doing it too. Let's look at that "j20" or whatever it's called and what do we see? Yep, the left has an extremism problem. You know what we call that kiddies? That's right, that would be a fascist ideology.

       

      This mistake was not countering the narrative that white males are oppressed and equality and progressive ideas have gone too far. Fear and resentment are powerful tools.

      The mistake was promoting that ideology and view in the first place. The second mistake is people jumping on board to support it. The third was then implementing progressive ideas that openly supported it and claiming it was diverse. You've suddenly discovered that the rest of society really doesn't support any of the bullshit you've been peddling -- rather they simply tolerated it. Then you decided to double down, and people started going "wait, didn't they argue against this." And you gave rise to the beast that'll kill it for you, unless you do it yourself.

      You enjoying your self-created extremism yet? You know what the real kicker is? You're now going to experience what it's like to be demonized, just like you've done to conservatives for decades. And it's going to be the moderates lining up to take shots at you.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  2. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess someone will have to program Putin's number in it for him.

  3. Tweet less by jwhyche · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did they take tweeter off it?

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:Tweet less by gnick · · Score: 2

      I don't know what the security implications are of having Twitter installed on the phone, but I'd be shocked if DJT didn't demand it. I'm sure a lot of his supporters and staff would like to have Twitter taken away so he'll stop making "He said WHAT!?!" headlines, but I'd be surprised if the inauguration was the last we heard of @realDonaldTrump. I do hope that he maintains a strict line between his personal opinions and tweets as @POTUS - I'd be upset if those weren't vetted in some fashion before being shared with the world. The thought of a @POTUS tweet complaining about SNL disturbs me.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  4. The office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The safest thing to do is give him a phone with no sim card, set the shortcut for twitter to open notepad, and let him tweet til his heart is content in that local text file.

  5. Please... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    tell me the phone somehow has Twitter blocked entirely.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  6. Not starting OS wars.. but by guacamole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am personally glad our new president wasn't part of the iSheep sect.

  7. Re:Reasonable and boring. by guacamole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's face it. Your argument is kinda weak because every president elect has always been the world's biggest target regardless of how much of the popular vote the pres won (for the curious, the presidential candidates must always spend resources to optimize their electoral college votes because that's what counts, unlike the useless popular vote). The president's smartphone is always locked down and provided by the government IT specialists regardless of what his previous preferences were. Just last year, when the Samsung Galaxy S7 was "the thing", Obama was handed a "locked down" Galaxy S4 because this is how it works. The commander in chief must always be using a tested and locked down device.

  8. At least he'll have Twitter by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

    He was not known to use it for making or receiving calls, but it was one of few devices that had access to the @POTUS Twitter account.

    And really, that's the most important part for Trump.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  9. Re: Reasonable and boring. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    ...currently still known as the Washington Monument...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Please please please..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell me they replaced it with a Samsung Note 7.

  11. should be been Bernie Sanders! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    should be been Bernie Sanders!

    1. Re:should be been Bernie Sanders! by thunderclees · · Score: 3, Interesting

      During Obama's first run the DNC was concerned about Hillary splitting the ticket so a deal was cut with the Clinton's that included the SOS appointment and the nomination when Obama's 2nd term was up. You could tell the fix was in as usually there are usually many candidates to throw their hat in the ring and this is whittled down quickly. This past DNC nomination was unusual in that there were so few to come forward especially since there are so many better candidates than Hillary in the DNC. Bernie would have run against Satan and he gave the nomination process an air of legitimacy but he was not supposed to win. He did far better then he should have as which is why he is enjoying his new $500k vacation home the DNC/Clinton's gave him to go away. After the nomination was completed much of the DNC committee resigned to avoid any potential fraud charges.

      The thing is that Trump did not win, Hillary lost. By nominating her the DNC gave most no choice, she was practically the worst candidate to nominate. Too much corruption and too polarizing for no good reason.

      “this is a man whohas said women don’t deserve equal pay unless they do as good a job as men.” - Hillary Clinton on how Trump is a sexist

  12. Android? by DesertBlade · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought only people who couldn't afford to use iPhone purchase Android.

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    1. Re:Android? by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      iPhone is for poor people who want to feel like they matter, it's a status symbol among the blue collar crowd... like prada, louis vuitton, dolce & gabbana, armani.... things that higher class people get paid to hawk in public but in private would never actually use

      So what kind of phone do the higher class people use in private? It's Windows Mobile isn't it?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  13. Bizarro World by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's sort of ironic that you call Trump a xenophobe while the entire Democrat and press establishment go on a witchhunt for foreigners that makes Mccarthyism look like Mr. Rogers.

    I'm curious what the sky looks like in the Bizarro World that republicans appear to inhabit where they actually believe this sort of crap. Tribalism at its finest people...

    Trump's xenophobic actions and statements stand on their own. If you don't recognize him for the reprehensible human being he is then I'm not sure what I can do to help you. The best arguments against Donald Trump come right out of his own unfiltered mouth. He's on the record endorsing torture, denigrating women, opposing reproductive rights, calling for mass deportations,endorsing trade wars, cutting taxes on the richest but not the poor, removing health care from millions without a plan to replace it, supporting religious bigotry, and a whole lot more.

  14. Trump is worse in every way by sjbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    She's a traitor, a habitual liar, incompetent, self-serving, and saggy-boobs deep in pay-for-play.

    "Traitor"? Seriously? Can I have some of what you are smoking? And claiming that Clinton is less of a self serving liar than Trump is just idiotic.

    Think on that. We elected an IDIOT because he's better than the alternative. If he gets our soldiers killed or sells us out, it'll be because he's dumb and incompetent, not because he's sleazy and malicious.

    Trump is dumb and incompetent AND sleazy and malicious. It's not either/or. The man collects vendettas like a teenager collects Pokemon cards. Whatever you imagine Clinton's faults to be, Trump has matched or exceeded each and every one of them. Trump is a reprehensible, cruel, ignorant, narcissist, whose only real talent is self promotion.

    At least with him, there's a chance.

    If you actually believe that then you are dumber than you claim Trump is.

    1. Re:Trump is worse in every way by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      As AC points out, just her email scandal showed how very corrupt she is. The Freedom of Information Act was designed to prevent corruption, and provide the American people with a view into the performance of their government. By running her private email server, she was able to prevent future FoIA requests from being delivered for information about what she did. What is more corrupt than bypassing a law passed by your own party to combat corruption?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?