Slashdot Mirror


Oracle Lays Off More Than 1,000 Employees (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader writes: According to the Mercury News, Oracle is laying off approximately 450 employees in its Santa Clara hardware systems division. Reports at The Layoff, a discussion board for technology business firings, claim about 1,800 employees company-wide are being pink-slipped. Oracle claims the company isn't closing the Santa Clara facility with this reduction in force. Instead, "Oracle is refocusing its Hardware Systems business, and for that reason, has decided to lay off certain of its employees in the Hardware Systems Division."

171 comments

  1. Good bye to Solaris by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like this is the end of Sun SPARC and Solaris.

    1. Re:Good bye to Solaris by nbritton · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Looks like this is the end of Sun SPARC and Solaris.

      Good riddance if you ask me, it was getting quite antiquated relative to Linux. Now we just need to kill off AIX. Hopefully everyone will standardize around Linux and BSD.

    2. Re:Good bye to Solaris by WolfWalker545 · · Score: 1

      AIX is easier to administer than Linux.

    3. Re:Good bye to Solaris by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Solaris we already knew from the post about Solaris 12 a few days back, so now, this seals it for the SPARC as well. The Sun part of Oracle is dead

    4. Re:Good bye to Solaris by nbritton · · Score: 2

      AIX is easier to administer than Linux.

      AIX is an abomination. ODM, smitty? Umm no thanks. I liked the POWER platform though.

    5. Re:Good bye to Solaris by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      SPARC/Solaris is mainly used for legacy systems that are too expensive to port to x86, or where the source or expertise to do the port no longer exist. It would be insane to use S/S for any new project. So it is a dwindling market, and it just passed the point where it is no longer profitable to develop new hardware. The existing systems will continue to be available, but they will fall further and further behind and eventually fade away.

    6. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ridicule AIX if you must, but the fact remains that I've never had an AIX system fail to boot for me due to an init system failure, while I've experienced multiple such problems with Linux due to systemd.

      AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, and FreeBSD all have their place, and it's when reliability and stability are a must. Linux, especially now with the systemd nonsense that's going on, cannot compete with them.

    7. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like this is the end of Sun SPARC and Solaris.

      Good riddance if you ask me, it was getting quite antiquated relative to Linux. Now we just need to kill off AIX. Hopefully everyone will standardize around Linux and BSD.

      Call me when fork() on Linux is async-signal-safe, or when Linux's `pwrite()` isn't borked (read the "Bugs" section on the man page...)

      See this on Linux fork() being broken: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4737

      That bug report is 10 years old.

      The Linux solution? Attempt get fork() removed from the POSIX standard as being required to be async-signal-safe.

      See GLIBC bug 4737 - "WONTFIX" == "too hard"

      I guess POSIX is too high a standard for Linux to be held to?

      Nevermind systemd....

    8. Re:Good bye to Solaris by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Oracle wanted to kill off sun - look at how many parts of sun tech they've crapped all over since they bought it. This is just the latest.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    9. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of last week, at the Oracle Cloudworld conference in New York, they were still promoting the Sparc Engineered Systems. How it was more secure and faster for database operations.

    10. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Linux kernel based operating systems are decades behind Solaris.
      When will Linux get a real memory manager? (current memory manager equal to congress's budgets - spend more than you have and kill off important things like education to pay for congressional vacations, healthcare and lifetime salaries).
      When will Linux get dtrace?
      When will Linux get a filesystem / volume manager that gets even close to being as good as ZFS?

      As I said, Linux kernel based operating systems are toys for tots, not real production environments.

    11. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux - If you don't care about uptime or application availability, use this.
      Solaris - If it has to be up all the time, use this.

    12. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solaris - You'd better hope it's up all the time, because it takes about three weeks to reboot.

    13. Re:Good bye to Solaris by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Are we still talking about Solaris, or NetWare? :)

    14. Re:Good bye to Solaris by n7ytd · · Score: 2

      Amen to this... what Solaris is good at, it is shockingly good at.

      Linux's internals look like the worst possible design-by-committee abomination possible.

      The problem is that all the cool kids are using Linux, and Solaris has been dying on the vine for years. Unless you're buying hardware from Oracle, it's getting increasingly difficult to find drivers supported on Solaris; vendors are not investing the time and effort to support their new hardware on the 20-year old Solaris platform. At least, that's what my experience supporting x86 Solaris 10 has been...

    15. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Yep, sad to say, Solaris is a much much better system than, say, this Linux thing. Does it have challenges? Sure. But compared to x86 hardware, Solaris/SPARC just runs circles around it, although more expensive circles.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    16. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      SPARC/Solaris or AIX based systems would be what I'd still base anything system critical on, at least until a couple of weeks ago. x86/Linux just doesn't cut it. I remember I had a Solaris box in a closet that ran consistently I actually forgot to reboot it for 5 years. The only reason I did wind up rebooting it was because it's memory got upgraded because certain functions got a little slower over time as things grew. Quadrupling memory (memory got both cheaper and larger in the meantime) and boom - back to like it was new. x86 Linux systems, at least pre-systemd, were ok but still require some hand-holding. More than 180 days of uptime wasn't really in the cards. No clue on systemd systems, I won't run one until I have no choice.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re: Good bye to Solaris by gmack · · Score: 0

      Really? I haven't had a boot failure in SystemD since Debian switched while I was running Debian experimental(years ago), and even then it was down to a bad entry in /etc/fstab (I had removed a disk) and it wasn't a total failure, the boot just hung for the total 5 minute timeout without telling me anything (now it tells you what it is waiting for) instead of immediately failing the way it did before.

      If you are having multiple failures you are clearly doing something wrong. It has been solid on all of my servers and that's even given my habit of customizing the boot scripts to allow for things like iSCSI, OCFS2, Distributed file systems etc.

    18. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Yup, as all here know I'm a BSD neckbeard but there's a different between industrial-strength OSes like AIX and Solaris and those where basically one guy can come along and fuck things up. Yeah, you guessed, not a fan of systemD

    19. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't like ODM? What's not to like about storing your UNIX system's operationally-critical data in a database?

    20. Re:Good bye to Solaris by gmack · · Score: 1

      I doubt it was intentional. Oracle is just running their acquisitions the same way they run their database division. The problem is that it's much easier to change hardware/OS than it is to change databases and where I work, that's what happened. We can't dump the Oracle DB (there will be no new projects on it though) but we already stopped buying their hardware after they raised the prices. We had a blade system with a dead blade, Oracle demanded $50k to replace our blade, we threw out the blade chassis instead since at that price, we could just buy a full sized server from someone else.

    21. Re: Good bye to Solaris by bmo · · Score: 1

      I've never seen problems booting due to systemd

      Systemd is pants-on-head retarded when dealing with Network Manager and waking from sleep. It /never/ reactivates the network.

      It is also pants-on-head retarded when a sound service won't start and it will just fucking /wait/ there while it won't start, instead of just failing it and moving on.

      These are issues I've personally had to deal with. With Ubuntu LTS, no less.

      And the whole point of systemd, so I've been told, is to make it /easier/ for workstation users. I don't see any more ease over sysvinit. Systemd is a solution looking for a problem, as far as I can tell. Unfortunately everyone is under the spell of Red Hat and Poettering these days.

      This off-topic post was brought to you by the letters F, U, B, A, and R.

      --
      BMO

    22. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux

      You mean Systemd/Linux?

    23. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually SPARC is ahead of Intel in terms of wire-speed encryption and 256 compute threads per chip.

    24. Re:Good bye to Solaris by WolfWalker545 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I admin AIX and Linux, I hardly ever use SMIT. Everything done through SMIT can be done using the command line, although the syntax is often obscure, but it's also all logged, so you can easily just script the operation in the future. AIX 7.2 now has live kernel updates, which is going to push uptimes even longer, especially combined with live partition mobility. Only hard failures I've had of AIX systems were when both my primary AND secondary storage arrays panicked (gotta love when management goes cheap and bleeding edge). Even then, I was able to recover the vast majority of my partitions without having to rebuild them.

    25. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like this is the end of Sun SPARC and Solaris.

      Good riddance if you ask me, it was getting quite antiquated relative to Linux. Now we just need to kill off AIX. Hopefully everyone will standardize around Linux and BSD.

      So what engineered unix systems will be left to copy from when that happens?

      I don't know if you've noticed but when commercial unix development stops it doesn't just move to Linux, it stops. Software either gets abandoned and donated to open source like XFS for example, or cloned like BTRFS.

      When no new commercial unix development happens you're left with all the original work that makes up Linux today, mostly authored by your distro vendor. Maybe you guys are OK with that, but stop and think where all the Linux features you use today came from, how they came to be.

    26. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux not friendly to competition? regardless of how much Linux is better(?), competition is good.

    27. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I also have seen what a problem with mounting due to systemd can cause.

      Whether it would have recovered after 5 minutes I cannot say - I cannot afford the downtime, especially when there's no explicit report as to what the hangup is. Besides, what's this about "the big advantage of systemd is faster boots" if it wants to park itself for 5 minutes?

      While there are some significant advantages that a theoretical systemd (i.e., one that confined itself to process management instead of Universe+dog) would have over sysV init, the actual difference is that sysV would generally let you come up - degraded and defective - but at least up enough to work on things, whereas systemd just sits there being useless,

    28. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I like writing C / C++ code under AIX that can safely dereference a NULL pointer.
      The SPARC architecture doesn't allow that - what's up with that!

      CAP === 'expunge'

    29. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I like writing C / C++ code under AIX that can safely dereference a NULL pointer.
      The SPARC architecture doesn't allow that - what's up with that!

      CAP === 'expunge'

      Read the "Notes" section of the ld.so.1 man page:

      The user compatibility library /usr/lib/0@0.so.1 provides a mechanism that establishes a value of 0 at location 0. Some applications exist that erroneously assume a null character pointer should be treated the same as a pointer to a null string. A segmentation violation occurs in these applications when a null character pointer is accessed. If this library is added to such an application at runtime using LD_PRELOAD, the library provides an environment that is sympathetic to this errant behavior. However, the user compatibility library is intended neither to enable the generation of such applications, nor to endorse this particular programming practice.

      It merely mmap() a page at address 0.

    30. Re: Good bye to Solaris by gmack · · Score: 1

      1 They fixed the "not saying anything" bit years ago. 2 I would rather they retry in case the disk is slow coming back online (some of SANs I just phased out were really slow) 3 The timeout is configurable.

    31. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be insane to use S/S for any new project.

      Well, unless you need a computer that is bigger than anything Intel makes. It is very frustrating that you can't buy an Intel system with more than a pathetic 3TB or so of RAM, and can't install more than about 12 HBAs in the largest available x86 systems.

      Intel is only really good for very small software projects, as anything bigger there is no scalability upgrade past about a 4 socket system. That is really too small for most of the systems we build.

      As HP is a dead-end, so that only leaves 3 choices for platform: SPARC, POWER or system/z. If Oracle is really leaving the SPARC marketplace, and HP is already guaranteed a departure by feat of Itanium being shitcanned, that would leave IBM in a monopoly position on large systems.

    32. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 2

      " x86/Linux just doesn't cut it. I remember I had a Solaris box in a closet that ran consistently I actually forgot to reboot it for 5 years. The only reason I did wind up rebooting it was because it's memory got upgraded because certain functions got a little slower over time as things grew. Quadrupling memory (memory got both cheaper and larger in the meantime) and boom - back to like it was new. x86 Linux systems, at least pre-systemd, were ok but still require some hand-holding. More than 180 days of uptime wasn't really in the cards. No clue on systemd systems, I won't run one until I have no choice."

      What nonsense.

      The uptime of our production Linux servers running on Dell PowerEdge, HP ProLiant, Sun "Galaxy" amd/intel servers or now Cisco UCS is limited only by the application of kernel or glibc securuty updates.

      Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.

      We are migrating (more than 50% done) most workloads to VMs running on Red Hat Enterprise Virtualisation, with 90%+ VMs running RHEL7. Systemd has been a total non-issue. I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...

    33. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      "Systemd is pants-on-head retarded when dealing with Network Manager and waking from sleep. It /never/ reactivates the network."

      In over 3 years running a distro using systemd, I've never seen this problem. All network interfaces work correctly on resume (except the 3G modem that needs its driver reloaded, but this is a driver problem).

      "It is also pants-on-head retarded when a sound service won't start and it will just fucking /wait/ there while it won't start, instead of just failing it and moving on."

      Never seen this one either. Sound mainly just works, including switching streams to my bluetooth headphones when connected.

      "These are issues I've personally had to deal with. With Ubuntu"

      Ah, Debian/Ubuntu users complaining about systemd. Why is it the Fedora/SUSE/CentOS/RHEL/Arch/Mageia users don't have these problems? Maybe Debian/Ubuntu-specific issues with their systemd migration/implementation?

    34. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.... I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...

      5 years? Seriously? You're running on an 5 year old kernel with multiple known issues (TLS, OpenSSL, etc)? I hope they're firewalled well. As for systemd, you must not be very well versed in it. SSH Fails, NTP magically fixed a service startup issue, no one knows why, and just a general list of why systemd sucks. And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks. You're in RH land with supported versions, so it's likely that these problems, when they crop up, are offloaded as RH issues and you just monitor a trouble ticket. Lucky you. I guess I wouldn't care in that scenario either, as it's SEP.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    35. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.... I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...

      5 years? Seriously? You're running on an 5 year old kernel with multiple known issues (TLS, OpenSSL, etc)?

      I didn't say they don't get any updates at all. They just don't have kernel updates applied. There are multiple firewalls protecting these specific servers from hostile users/networks, and 90% of the people who have any access at all (e.g. HTTPS access) have sudo rights to run various things as root on them anyway. The only systems that have any firewall access to them are the other monitoring servers, and all the monitoring software is kept up-to-date.

      As for systemd, you must not be very well versed in it. SSH Fails,

      Yes, some versions of systemd introducing new features may have bugs. Only immature distros would push such versions out to users of stable releases.

      NTP

      Using timesyncd isn't mandatory. The distro I use on my laptop doesn't use it, RHEL7.3 doesn't ship it.

      magically fixed a service startup issue, no one knows why,

      Doesn't seem like anyone could reproduce that on other versions (shipped in stable distros, or current).

      and just a general list of why systemd sucks.

      Of the 5 major complaints, 3 are about the journal. There are some advantages to it, and some disadvantages, and I think systemd should support not using journald at all, but you can avoid relying on the journal itself by forwarding to syslog and disabling storage.

      Regarding giving block devices for filesystems listed as required in /etc/fstab, this is a conscious design decision that is required in environments with complex storage (many storage arrays in a complex storage area network). The alternative (with e.g. sysvinit) is to have your production database servers fail to come up at boot time because the init system didn't give enough time for all 100 LUNs to appear so that it could mount the filesystems required to let the database start. It is really fun to have to be woken up to get such systems back up after a rack has tripped because then engineer on standby can't figure out what to do, I'd rather have systemd do the right thing. As far as I know, the default timeouts have been reduced (systemd wasn't hanging though ... it was waiting for devices it was told were required to appear) and provide more information on why it is waiting.

      The 4th issue is cosmetic, and applies to most kernel drivers ... only dracut namespaces its parameters (rd.xxx).

      And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks.

      Yes, it is trivial to find old bugs that are fixed, and FUD complaints from systemd haters about behaviour that has been improved.

      You're in RH land with supported versions, so it's likely that these problems, when they crop up, are offloaded as RH issues and you just monitor a trouble ticket. Lucky you. I guess I wouldn't care in that scenario either, as it's SEP.

      Our production servers run Red Hat. We haven't needed to log a ticket for anything systemd-related.

      My workstation, my laptop, and the desktop my wife uses at home run a different distro not associated with Red Hat at all that switched to systemd long ago, and I have seen no issues there either.

    36. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather slit my wrists than use AIX ever again. Solaris was cool back in the day but that was a long time ago. If anything I find even Linux and BSD over complex for what I really need most of the time these days.

    37. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks.

      Yes, it is trivial to find old bugs that are fixed, and FUD complaints from systemd haters about behaviour that has been improved.

      I'll note that with 1 "fixed" bug, the rest appeared to all be current. You give a specific instance where systemd helps you. Just one. IIRC, you should be able to achieve the same effect in the other scripts by merely checking and waiting on pieces to come up (admittedly, this has been more than a few years, my memory may be hazy as to its simplicity) You also specify several workarounds outside of systemd to deal with things others don't like. The thing you don't address is why systemd, purportedly a startup management system, appears to have taken over as almost a full OS. I personally think that's my largest argument against it - it's monolithic, which has ALWAYS been a bad model.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    38. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      You give a specific instance where systemd helps you. Just one.

      No, I was responding to one of the examples provided as to why 'systemd sucks' in that it seemed (in the past) to hang at boot if there was a bad entry in /etc/fstab. There is good justification for what systemd is doing (and sysvinit doesn't assist the admin at all in this regard, so the sysvinit user is left to modify all sorts of scripts like rc.sysinit - that will be overwritten by a software update - to resolve these problems).

      As someone who has also been involved in packaging software for linux distros (and for internal use), I have no problem writing an init script, but I have also seen the many traps that inexperienced users will fall into when writing/modifying an init script. Systemd has done a lot to standardise the way services must behave and provide configuration-based customisation for the most common types of customisation required, such as setting limits, limited configuration required of the service, running a script before starting the daemon etc.

      IIRC, you should be able to achieve the same effect in the other scripts by merely checking and waiting on pieces to come up (admittedly, this has been more than a few years, my memory may be hazy as to its simplicity)

      I (and you) might be able to, but at present I doubt any of my colleagues would be able to do it correctly without leaving a booby trap for the next sysadmin.

      You also specify several workarounds outside of systemd to deal with things others don't like.

      So, not using an optional service that systemd provides but doesn't require is a workaround outside of systemd?

      The thing you don't address is why systemd, purportedly a startup management system, appears to have taken over as almost a full OS.

      So in the past we have run DJBs service tools to supervise processes that are prone to die regularly, but then you can end up with conflicts with what sysvinit wants to do vs what sv_stat, sv etc. want to do, and you have no dependency tracking between the services supervised by the DJBware and the init system (so qmail starts accepting mail before the NFS mailstores are mounted, and bounces the emails until someone notices the alert and mounts the mailstores). Then you have services run by xinetd (started by sysvinit), again with little coordination between them and other services. To me it does make sense to have one daemon that takes care of launching and killing all services. Then again, there is the argument about one cgroup controller (which was apparently the primary reason for systemd in the first place), and as far as I know there isn't a competing init system that has comprehensive built-in native support for cgroups.

      It is unfortunate that a lot of other tooling that pre-dates systemd has so much bit-rot that the systemd developers seem to think writing a replacement (e.g. systemd-login) is better than asking the developers (of e.g. ConsoleKit, which itself was a replacement for something, pam_console?) to fix the bugs, but I don't think the intention is to make systemd an OS. And it is quite modular, many of their newer tools are optional (where possible).

    39. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      No, I was responding to one of the examples provided as to why 'systemd sucks' in that it seemed (in the past) to hang at boot if there was a bad entry in /etc/fstab.

      It'd be nice if there were dependencies marked and things could move on while it waited. I don't recall if systemd allows for this now. I obviously haven't looked at a system in a while, and this only takes me down memory lane.

      [init scripts]

      I (and you) might be able to, but at present I doubt any of my colleagues would be able to do it correctly without leaving a booby trap for the next sysadmin.

      It is true that init script editing can be obtuse. Then again, you should know what you're doing when you're mucking about with the configuration of enterprise systems. If your colleagues can't do it correctly, perhaps they shouldn't be tasked with those types of jobs. I wouldn't expect a web dev to configure an HA cluster of DBs. I wouldn't expect a DBA to edit JavaScript for a webapp. You should be good in your areas of expertise, or you shouldn't be hired for those tasks. Regardless of whatever management's smoking this week, people are not interchangeable cogs, and expertise is a real differentiator.

      So, not using an optional service that systemd provides but doesn't require is a workaround outside of systemd?

      Like I said, it's been a while, but I don't recall it being optional when I looked at it.

      It is unfortunate that a lot of other tooling that pre-dates systemd has so much bit-rot that the systemd developers seem to think writing a replacement (e.g. systemd-login) is better than asking the developers (of e.g. ConsoleKit, which itself was a replacement for something, pam_console?) to fix the bugs, but I don't think the intention is to make systemd an OS. And it is quite modular, many of their newer tools are optional (where possible).

      I'll agree that it would have been nice to have a parallel initialization system created that allowed for dependencies. Systemd's supposed premise is valid, the implementation seems overly broad and all encompassing.

      systemd-login was the big WTF. To have something like Gnome completely dependent upon a system initialization tool seems completely fubar, doesn't it? What, pray tell, does a GUI have to do with system initialization, other than to be initialized by it? These are the types of things that drive people away from systemd. If it just initialized your system, ok, I can live with that. To infiltrate and essentially tie entire sets of software to your optional and non essential tool is what drives the systemd hate, and deservedly so.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  2. Rip Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last of the Sun Microsystems people getting the boot. Sad.

    1. Re:Rip Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Maybe Java will be killed next.

    2. Re:Rip Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oracle's dumping, Microsoft is dumping. Not saying that the writing wasn't on the wall for Sun tech, but I'm thinking that these and other companies are probably going to dump a lot of people soon before the new regime starts interfering with layoff rules. SAD!

  3. At The Same Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are 1000 job postings at Oracle for bilingual engineers... no doubt their H1-B replacements.

  4. If Only... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only someone at the Oracle could have foretold this.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:If Only... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should have bought Borland, too. Oracle Delphi could have predicted this.

    2. Re:If Only... by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      It's sad when people don't remember wgere names come from. Like why Borland called it Delphi.

  5. Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oracle is less and less a software company and becoming more about making sales, then gouging their clients.

    1. Re:Surprised? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oracle is less and less a software company and becoming more about making sales, then gouging their clients.

      That has been true for 30 years. I remember making an inquiry in the early 1990s, and instead of giving me technical specs, they started badgering me for the name of the "decision maker". When I finally relented and gave them the name of my (non-technical) boss, they ignored me, and started calling him using pushy tactics that would make a door-to-door vacuum cleaner salesman proud.

    2. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember next time. "I am the decision maker for my 200M division, however I haven't had enough hookers and blow to make a decision in weeks"

      Captcha: expunge

    3. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just Oracle, but many "tech" companies are being forced to become "financial" companies.
      I work for a global engineering company, and our reputation is turning to trash because the executive suite is busy feathering their nests, upping dividend payments, stripping the workforce, and trying most desperately to sell off what's still left. They meet the sales goals, but still fire good staff because corporate says so, and don't offer a sweet penny as a bonus or salary increase.
      When it was a private company, it was the best in the world.
      Now it's rapidly becoming an empty shell with layers of MBA "improvements" making things progressively worse with additional "measurements".
      We'll go bust as soon as we fail to meet one of contractual agreements and have to pay the penalties - it's only a matter of time.
      I'm updating my CV, as I watch my senior colleagues hand in their notices, without even having new jobs to go to yet ...

  6. It's oracle, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel for the 500 lawyers, 200 managers, 50 directors, 149 assistant and one temp programmer needing to find a new job...

    1. Re:It's oracle, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could retrain as bricklayers if they don't mind moving to the Mexico border.

       

    2. Re:It's oracle, so... by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      No love for the Salespeople?

    3. Re:It's oracle, so... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Did he stutter.

    4. Re:It's oracle, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were represented by the 100 people he left out.

    5. Re:It's oracle, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel for the 500 lawyers, 200 managers, 50 directors, 149 assistant and one temp programmer needing to find a new job...

      I feel for the 500 lawyers, 200 lawyers, 50 lawyers, 149 assistant and one temp lawyer needing to find a new job...

      There, FTFY.

  7. Pink-slipped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pink%20slipped

    1. Re:Pink-slipped? by slew · · Score: 1

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pink%20slipped

      My favorite pseudo-etymology is that your employer gives you back your pink slip, so you can sell your soul to another company...

  8. Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Oracle lays off workers.

    2) Oracle announces they are moving manufacturing/design overseas.

    3) Trump locks up the Oracle CEOs and forbids the company from doing business in the US or moving its assets overseas.

    4) We don't have to deal with Oracle, Java, Solaris, or any of their other dribble ever again.

    MAGA.

    1. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAJ&JFA

      Make America Java and Javascript free again!

    2. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JavaScript is perfectly fine (in fact it is one of the best modern languages.) Java is something completely different.

    3. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by higuita · · Score: 0

      nope, trump finds that the cost of dumping oracle is huge and as a business guy will make the same decision... fuck it, keep using oracle

      It he tried to rise oracle taxes... oracle will rise the cost for their products and the money will return to oracle pockets

      --
      Higuita
    4. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Javascript a "perfectly fine" and "modern" language? +5 funny!!

    5. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the part about locking them up and liquidating their assets.

    6. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the part about locking them up and liquidating their assets.

      You can do that if you're a Somali warlord. The President of the United States can't. There's that pesky thing called the Constitution.

    7. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do that if you're a Somali warlord. The President of the United States can't. There's that pesky thing called the Constitution.

      Well, there used to be. The last 2 presidents haven't worried about that piece of paper very much and Trump can't even be bothered to remain above arguing inauguration attendance estimates.

      The Republican Party now owns pretty much the entire Federal Government and has lost no time shredding anything they don't like. Oracle's best bet is to snag some no-bid contracts while the candy is being passed out, er, privatized.

    8. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Trump would probably find killing Oracle would be like one of his four bankrupcies. Like, say, the Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino one. He can let Oracle go belly up & claim that HE didn't go belly up

    9. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Uh, the GOP is pretty much at the mercy of Trump. There are quite a few factions in the house - Ryan loyalists, the Freedom Caucus, the Cruz conservatives, the Rand Paul Libertarians... so Trump can form alliances w/ any of these groups if the Congressional leadership tries to do anything to sabotage him

  9. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks, Trump!

  10. Wonder how long before by oldgraybeard · · Score: 2

    The NEW Oracle Advanced Hardware Systems Division, India opens ;)

  11. Is Fujitsu in the tank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I understand it they are still going strong with SPARC, and unlike Sun/Oracle had been doing quite well producing performance oriented SPARC Processors. Now if only they could scale one of those, or simply use defective dies to create some low cost desktop/workstation priced machines to get mindshare back focused on them...

    1. Re:Is Fujitsu in the tank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know what you're smoking. SPARC has been dying for years. It will take a while to bleed out completely, but it's over.

    2. Re:Is Fujitsu in the tank? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or simply use defective dies to create some low cost desktop/workstation priced machines to get mindshare back focused on them...

      The problem is the world belongs to commodity hardware, and SPARC has not nor has it ever been commodity. And so much as others fawning over how good Solaris is over Linux don't forget OS/2 was a better OS than Windows and look what happened to it. Oracle is not known for it's great management practices.

      Linux is "good enough" and people will buy that. It will make up any perceived shortcomings over time and eventually match the old Solaris in quality..

    3. Re:Is Fujitsu in the tank? by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Or Fujitsu could go w/ something like OpenBSD or FreeBSD on SPARC, and leverage off the community

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Ok black list from using H1B's for some time unles by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Ok black list from using H1B's for some time unless they hire USC's first.

  14. Re:Where's the president by geekmux · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Where's Trump when you need him?

    Simple math shows that Trump is likely irrelevant.

    California salaries > Indian salaries + Trump import tax

  15. Re: Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Checking the nukes

  16. Math by wbr1 · · Score: 1
    1000 jobs. Let us assume 100k per year per job cost to company. This is probably higher. This is 100 Million per year.

    Looks like good old Larry can fund himself another megayacht now.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or give up closing his golf course for a day to allow Obama to lament his legacy.

  17. Not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Litigation company fires anyone not necessary for litigation, and this surprises people?

  18. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Informative
    They better watch it - Foxconn is thinking of opening a $7 Billion display screen factory in the USA, on top of $50 Billion, and you know darned well that fear of Trump putting duties on them is part of it.

    Foxconn, the world's largest contract electronics maker, is considering setting up a display-making plant in the United States in an investment that would exceed $7 billion, company chairman and chief executive Terry Gou said on Sunday.

    The plans come after U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to put "America First" in his inauguration speech on Friday, prompting Gou to warn about the rise of protectionism and a trend for politics to underpin economic development.

    You really have to admit that 30-50k new jobs is significant.

    Gou said he told Son that the United States has no panel-making industry but it is the second-largest market for televisions. An investment for a display plant would exceed $7 billion and could create about 30,000-50,000 jobs, Gou told Son.

    You can hate on him all you want, but if fear of Trump can bring manufacturing jobs back, the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did. As for the rest, you should all wish for more success stories, despite your personal opinions. It's not like any other president hasn't been an asshole. Why? "It's the economy, stupid!"

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  19. Monoculture == Stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Linux monoculture would be a terrible thing. It would lead to stagnation, like always happens when there's a monoculture of any sort.

    Just look at what has been happening to Linux itself recently. The last few years have seen every major Linux distro switch to systemd. The only distros that haven't switched are little-used niche or hobbyist distros like Slackware (and if you think Solaris feels "antiquated"...), Devuan (I consider it a total failure at this point), and Gentoo (I don't want to wait a month for everything to compile).

    Basically everyone using a modern version of Linux is part of a monoculture. They all use the Linux kernel. They all use systemd. They all use a lot of software from the GNU project. There's so little diversity. The differences that do exist are essentially cosmetic at this point.

    A Fedora installation used to feel different from, say, a Debian installation. These days the biggest difference is whether you type "apt-get" or "yum" to manage packages.

    Maybe it's more convenient for the distro maintainers, but it's awful for everybody else. It's not like the old days, where if we had problems with one major distro we could easily try another major distro that didn't use the same software and thus avoided the problems. But we've lost that ability. Now if we have a problem with systemd, for example, we can't just use another major Linux distro. We typically have to ditch Linux completely, and use something like FreeBSD, OpenBSD, or dare I say it, even Windows instead.

    At least we have the *BSDs to fall back on when Linux becomes unusable for us. And at least there's still a natural diversity among the different *BSDs. But it's a shame that we no longer have many options beyond the *BSDs. If they don't work for us, we're essentially stuck using Windows, or maybe mac OS.

    1. Re:Monoculture == Stagnation by arth1 · · Score: 2

      A Fedora installation used to feel different from, say, a Debian installation. These days the biggest difference is whether you type "apt-get" or "yum" to manage packages.

      That was sooo last year. This year, Fedora uses "dnf" instead of yum. It only has a subset of the functionality that yum provided, but it's new!!!1! and what's missing will the there Real Soon Now.

      I think the name dnf is an apt name...

    2. Re:Monoculture == Stagnation by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      and what's missing will the there Real Soon Now

      Does dnf stand for "definitely not finished"?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Monoculture == Stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike systemd or Gnome 3, whatever features yum had that dnf lacks are not critical day-to-day features. I didn't even notice anything missing.

      Well, except for one thing. "yum" is a word that's a lot easier to remember than "dnf".

    4. Re: Monoculture == Stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does not function?

    5. Re:Monoculture == Stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dnf is the biggest pile of steaming crap.
      Identical command line interface to yum, but with completely different operations and behaviour.
      Author said suck it up, 'cause he ain't gonna fix nuttin'!

      CAP === 'fission'

  20. Oracle favored firing White Males by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But nobody cares.

  21. something adds up for once. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    the question isnt when will oracle stop supporting sparc, or when is solaris going to finally die, but what was it that Larry saw at the mega-yacht store that day that was worth the salary of 1800 employees...and does it light up?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  22. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, that's in true in general. In this case, I think the formula in use is:

    Hardware revenues - (California | foreign + Trump) hardware expenses Desired margins

    Btw, on an unrelated note, I wish Oracle would GPL solaris and that project Indiana could resume as OpenSolaris.

  23. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am really hoping that Trump is simply a genius and manages to have the cake and eat it too. There is the slim-but-now-not-non-existent chance that we can: 1) still stand for free trade, 2) end up with most of the high-tech infrastructure construction, rendering 3) the US a manufacturing powerhouse and export king. If Trump threatens enough that people actually build *mega-factory* in America, America will actually be best poised to export *megaFactoryProducts*. That said, it is going to be really hard to get there by threats alone.

  24. Re: Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like tweeting about the size of something. He seems to be ... lacking in size confidence.

  25. Re:Where's the president by jimtheowl · · Score: 0

    Setting up a new School of Masonry.

  26. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    [...] the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did.

    Except Trump isn't going to bring back the manufacturing jobs of yesteryear. A new factory today will hire a few dozen workers to handle a machine that does the work of 1,500 workers.

  27. I just got pink slipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How am I going to tell my wife? My three kids?

    We have a nice house in Santa Clara...how am I going to afford it now?

    No no no no nonononnonononononononononono

    1. Re: I just got pink slipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no hope for you...there's no hope for any of us. Automation, H-1bs...we are doomed!

    2. Re:I just got pink slipped by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      If you worked at hardware or software at Sun you can start sending resumes to NVIDIA and Intel. I think they have some HQ in Santa Clara.

  28. Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oracle Delphi could have predicted this.

    Who says a Liberal Arts education/knowledge is worthless!!!!

    Look how it has enriched our lives. Liberal arts is history, art, the finer stuff .... and the neurosciences geeks would argue that ALL human knowledge is interrelated.

    I for one breezed through data structures because I used music analogies. Easiest 'A' in a two week Summer session ever.

    1. Re:Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please elaborate on how you used music analogies to learn data structures? That sounds really intriguing. Thanks!

    2. Re:Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please elaborate on how you used music analogies to learn data structures? That sounds really intriguing. Thanks!

      I think that's it.

    3. Re:Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

      I took Music Theory in college, even got an A in it.

      I don't remember any parallels to Data Structures whatsoever.
      At least, I don't remember anything that looked/sounded like a red-black tree.

      So, I too am very curious about these music analogies.

    4. Re: Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back that hash up
      Eye of the pointer
      I need a zero
      Linked list fever
      It's a null world after all

      Also, if you like movies you can instead make movie analogies , like 50 structs of gray.

    5. Re:Mod parent up!!! by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I took Symbolic Logic from the philosophy department, which was labeled "humanities" in my school, but seemingly would fall into your "liberal arts" category. It was extremely applicable to programming and database logic.

  29. Oracle "gouging their clients" by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0

    "Oracle ... gouging their clients."

    One example of Oracle's gouging, two stories:

    Oregon settles bitter legal fight with Oracle for $100 million

    Oregon Reaches $100 Million Settlement With Oracle

    How it happens: Managers with no technical knowledge believe they can buy contracts for technology development. Technology companies know they can say anything and it will usually be accepted.

    Another example of an ignorant manager assuming it is possible to manage technology without knowing anything about technology: Price for Failed Obamacare Website: $394 Million and Counting.

    Former U.S. President Barack Obama often acts like a knowledgeable leader even when the depth of his knowledge is extremely shallow.

    1. Re:Oracle "gouging their clients" by ph0rk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Former U.S. President Barack Obama often acts like a knowledgeable leader even when the depth of his knowledge is extremely shallow.

      Good thing we've got the new guy. He'd never do that.

      --
      semantics are everything!
  30. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They better watch it - Foxconn is thinking of opening a $7 Billion display screen factory in the USA, on top of $50 Billion, and you know darned well that fear of Trump putting duties on them is part of it.

    Nope. I don't know or believe that for a second. See, I'm not dumb. I can actually read that Foxconn had plans before Trump even threw his hat into the ring.

    More importantly, I dislike governance by fear, and what I also know is that if ANYBODY on the left-wing side said anything like what Trump purports to do, the Republicans would shake in their boots at the vileness of government interfering with the free market, and most importantly, I know that the suffering factory workers in Asia, whose plight I also care about, will not be in Trump's thoughts. So not only will he be ignoring real problems, the political allies in the legislature won't be genuinely interested in doing the thing, at most, they'll appear to do it.

    More likely, they'll get fed up with him, and toss him on his ass as soon as he gives them an opening.

    You really have to admit that 30-50k new jobs is significant.

    In a country of over 300 million? Nope. In a country with a workforce of 160 million or so. Nope. Heck, I still remember the right-wing shills complaining about people leaving the workforce and not even looking for jobs, thanks to Obama. Now you want me to praise Trump for a pittance?

    Says more about you than the economy.

    You can hate on him all you want, but if fear of Trump can bring manufacturing jobs back, the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did. As for the rest, you should all wish for more success stories, despite your personal opinions. It's not like any other president hasn't been an asshole. Why? "It's the economy, stupid!"

    Ah, here's the thing, Trump won't bring them back, but he will absolutely insist he is, so the naive will be thinking the world is changing for the better, and all too easily believe that it's the GREAT TRUMP who is saving them, even as the Emperor's lack of clothes becomes apparent.

    I agree there will be lots of "success stories" but that's the problem. See, it won't be true stories. It'll be works of fiction. And the kind of asshole that Trump is, is one that is very dangerous, though perhaps you might not be aware of it. He's the conniving deceitful sort that gets a roaring crowd behind him as he convinces Democracy to sign its death warrant.

    He's very dangerous.

  31. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to end personal income tax and replace it with tariffs. Benefits citizens and sticks it to the Global Conglomerations and their "labor arbitrage" .

  32. They're the lucky ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given what I know about what it's like to work for Oracle, those who get to keep their jobs are the real victims.

  33. Tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Alternative Fact: Trump supporters are well endowed.

    1. Re:Tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump supporters are well endowed in the pussy flaps.

  34. Oracle, what a joke. by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a known quantity. Oracle rep lie sell their substandard product with shitty support, piecemeal features, and a huge bill. You deserve what you get. Almost as bad as contracting with IBM, but not quite. IBM has decent support.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:Oracle, what a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I have never seen an Oracle custom app that the customer was happy with. We spent over $5M a few years back to ultimately scrap the project. Mostly because it didn't work, and they wanted a whole pile of money over and above what we'd already spent to "maybe" make it work.

    2. Re:Oracle, what a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM "had" decent support.

      Fixed that for you

    3. Re:Oracle, what a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a known quantity. Oracle rep lie sell their substandard product with shitty support, piecemeal features, and a huge bill. You deserve what you get. Almost as bad as contracting with IBM, but not quite. IBM has decent support.

      The word is "had".. IBM "had" decent support. Now it is outsource to the Asian sub-continent or else they just pay the penalty to get out of the contract.

    4. Re:Oracle, what a joke. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'm not hip to IBMs shitlord status anymore, thank god.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  35. Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Trump will claim this too as "made available 1000 highly skilled workers to Make us great again"

  36. Cisco model... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Oracle is following the Cisco model of announcing layoffs of Americans at the front door while bringing in H1B workers through the back door.

  37. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what happens when other countries either do the same to their own companies, or retaliate and erect tariffs on our products? Do you think corporations are going to cater to ~300 million max market (us) or a >1 billion market (and thats just china)?

    Meanwhile sure we might have more jobs (minus the stuff that will be automated away), but everything is going to cost a lot more so who is going to be able to afford them? Domestic companies are offshoring not because they love foreigners or hate Americans, they are doing it because it leads to cheaper products.

  38. Re:Where's the president by lgw · · Score: 2

    There are over a million skilled manufacturing jobs unfilled right now. There's plenty to manufacture, but skilled workers willing to do blue-collar work are hard to find. Sure, we'll never return to the old days, "but the good old days weren't always good, and tomorrow ain't as bad as it seems".

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  39. Is Trump taking credit for this one too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This one combined with Microsoft's layoffs has already cancelled out the few hundred jobs Trump was so proud of keeping in the US a few weeks. Maybe the Oracle employees can get a job at Carrier.

    1. Re:Is Trump taking credit for this one too by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Good thing Obama is gone. Now this can stop.

  40. Re: Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm considering opening a $54 billion flying car company in San Jose CA. I'll employ at least 75,000 currently-out-of-work steel workers and coal workers. I'll pay them $117 per hour on a 30 hour work week, with full benefits including unlimited time off. That's what I'm considering.

  41. Never good news (folks losing work) but... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oracle *may* have just decided to not only save '$' but also to concentrate on the 1 really GOOD product they have: Their database engine. Java's turned up full of problems, their other wares & OS apparently (along w/ hardware for them) aren't turning profits like they used to (apparently).

    * I've worked around it, often cross-platform from PC's & Servers to midranges - it was fast, stable, with good api's to access it with (generally pretty outstanding - was in many ways miles above offerings from IBM in DB2 or Microsoft's SQL Server imo & experience (solid 7++ yrs. @ that point in my former career as a programmer-analyst/software-engineer)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Still, it's never good news to hear folks lose jobs but, with a name like Oracle on your resume? You're probably going to land on your feet just fine for the next job you land... apk

    1. Re:Never good news (folks losing work) but... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you waste so much time posting such obvious blithering nonsense? Do you really enjoy the thought of people rolling their eyes and laughing at you THAT much, AlexStaar? Wow, just wow.

  42. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    There's plenty to manufacture, but skilled workers willing to do blue-collar work are hard to find.

    Is the problem a lack of skilled workers willing to do the job or employers unwilling to train non-skilled workers?

    Based on my experience in Fortune 500 companies, employers are looking for people who already have the necessary job skills and could start without any training. One manager told me that he could train me but it would be a waste of his time as I would only leave to get a better paying job at a competitor. Never mind that many employees were training themselves, getting certified and leaving for better paying jobs at competitors anyway.

  43. Re:Where's the president by lgw · · Score: 1

    Employers don't train. Never have. Not really their core competency. The failure lies elsewhere, but it is a failure, and one we must address as a society as unskilled jobs dwindle away.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  44. Re:Where's the president by Desler · · Score: 1

    Companies "think" about doing things all the time. Get back to us when it actually happens. Secondly, even if it does happen why do you presume Foxconn won't just heavily automate it so as to hire as a few people as possible?

  45. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Employers don't train. Never have. Not really their core competency.

    That's because bean counters on Wall Street declared training as an unnecessary expense back in the 1980's. Since then it has become the public school system responsibility to train students into employees. If you don't know how to flip burgers out of high school, you're unemployable for the rest of your life.

  46. Damnit, trump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damnit, Trump.

  47. So long SPARC? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I guess this coupled with the announcement about Solaris last week means Oracle is finally finished squeezing the last pennies out of the SPARC/Solaris architecture. Admittedly it's very rare to see new implementations of a proprietary UNIX...every place I've dealt with in the last few years is trying to rid themselves of all the legacy code and hardware that keeps them on Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, etc.

    I wonder what kind of cost/benefit calculation they came up with. The company I work for has a bunch of mainframe stuff still in production, and they pay a king's ransom to CA to license a package that hasn't changed in ages, but must keep running no matter what. I can't imagine Oracle is giving away Solaris and SPARC support contracts and licenses...it must be a massive amount and certainly enough to keep a bunch of Solaris engineers on staff to fix the occasional bug. 1000 people is a lot though -- I wonder how many of those were in sales? Salesmen are expensive in terms of all the meals, rounds of golf and strip club visits they have to give away to customers.

    You know what would suck? Oracle kills the old Sun, then miraculously opens a new office in a "low cost geography" so they can keep squeezing for another 20 years! This is what HP did with OpenVMS for a long time before they got tired of supporting it and sold it to a third party.

  48. Re:Where's the president by lgw · · Score: 1

    Not just the 80s - employers have never been willing to train for skilled labor, unless you go back to old-school apprenticeships, starting at age 12 and replacing later schooling. With some relevant training, employers will generally soak of the cost of the last 10%, just as you do when hiring someone from a non-identical job elsewhere. But that takes proving that you've already learned the basics, or a similar skill (and thus proving you can learn).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  49. Good Riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bureaucracy is not an enabler.

    Bureaucracy does not produce anything.

    Bureaucracy does not increase wealth.

    Oracle sells Bureaucracy, and only Bureaucracy.

    Kill it.

    Kill it with fire.

  50. Re:Where's the president by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    So why not "outsource" to somewhere cheaper in the center of the country. Just pick a breadbasket state and go for it. The map here is a good reference: How Much $100 is really worth in every state. Think of it like playing with exchange rates, but domestically.

  51. The bubble is bursting by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    Hope you saved some money

    1. Re:The bubble is bursting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just accountants ruining tech again... Here in Central Europe, you cannot even get them to do a clean setup of their non-DB products. i.e., the ones they bought from Sun or BEA. Even their senior sales staff are already leaving the slowly sinking ship

  52. Re:Where's the president by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 0

    You can hate on him all you want, but if fear of Trump can bring manufacturing jobs back, the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did

    It's really fascinating how insane this presidency is. The left in the developed world has traditionally been against globalization and free trade, precisely out of fear of low-wage jobs not being competitive against developing countries overseas. Also out of fear of environmental and labor exploitation in countries with less regulations. It was the conservative, pro big business agenda to push for more globalization and free trade.
    Now you have Trump, who is a businessman himself and ran as a Republican, yet moving into a direction that runs counter to a few deeply rooted Republican beliefs. And despite his plans, he has still filled his cabinet with a few big business players who you'd think have little love for some of his isolationist plans. Similar story with NATO, his views of Russia and his not so conservative opinions on gay rights and abortion.

    Trump has been voted by a few deeply conservative circles and disillusioned, low-class liberals, he is actually quite on the left with some of his policies, yet his cabinet is right, sometimes far-right, whereas his party is conservative... I'm just waiting for this presidency to implode onto itself. There are too many contradictions.

    It won't help either that unfortunately Trump is such a twit.

  53. Re: Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only half of a business plan. Where's your revenue?

  54. Re:Where's the president by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

    I can actually read that Foxconn had plans before Trump even threw his hat into the ring

    Cite your source, please. I think the jobs issue is much more complex than Trump lets on. But, the last 4 presidents certainly weren't friends of manufacturing. I do see the Foxconn commitment as "fear of Trump". But, I can be convinced otherwise should you find an article demonstrating something counter to Reuters article.

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  55. No intention to imply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was no intention to imply anything good about Donald Trump.

  56. Re: Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only half of a business plan. Where's your revenue?

    Ask the multi-billion-dollar dot-com companies.

    We don't need no steenking REVENUE!

  57. F'n thanks trump for kiling those jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done you orange midget that's a thousand jobs you've killed off now. AND the last lot we lost from Microsoft! How many people are going to be in work after you've done your "job saving" huh?

  58. Re:Where's the president by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    The infrastructure and support staff it takes to manage what the bots are doing takes a little more than "a few dozen workers" in those factories. Think shipping, raw materials, management... that's why they have such large parking lots. Full automation is coming, buts it not quite here yet.... there may not be many assembly line jobs left, but forklift drivers, automation specialists, various clerks and faces... they still put a LOT of people to work.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  59. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    The estimate is 30,000 to 50,000 new jobs. Not a few dozen workers. And that's only the beginning

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  60. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Small employers have always trained people on the job.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  61. Re:Where's the president by gtall · · Score: 1

    BS. This is just Foxconn playing el Presidente Tweety's ego. He's such a rube.

  62. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The infrastructure and support staff it takes to manage what the bots are doing takes a little more than "a few dozen workers" in those factories.

    Not according to The Wall Street Journal.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-factories-are-working-again-factory-workers-not-so-much-1482080400

  63. Re:Where's the president by gtall · · Score: 1

    First off, it the article said "could", not will. This is just a play to Trump's ego, he's such an easy mark.

  64. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The estimate is 30,000 to 50,000 new jobs.

    For American or foreign workers? When I tried to break into electronic assembly work in Silicon Valley in the 1990's, all the work was done by Filipinos who came over to the U.S. to work these jobs. Being the only white guy in line when a company was hiring, I was told to go away when I asked for an application.

  65. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    First, you are full of shit. Foxconn originally planned to reduce overall employment at their factories by replacing workers with robots, while building new factories, so they could increase production while reducing headcount. It didn't work out quite how they hoped. Turns out it's easier to replace white-collar jobs with Watson. When AI learns how to code AI, the trend will accelerate.

    Also, the reuters story I linked to also talks about Foxconn's plans for another $50 billion in investment - that's a total of new jobs than all the employed in Wyoming.

    Sanders would have been better - far better - but Clinton would have been worse.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  66. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    The estimates of employee count are Foxconn's.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  67. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    Trump is actually very left-leaning on gays and lesbians, transsexuals, and abortion. What he says now and what he's done in the past are contradictory. I'd say actions speak louder than words. Like all politicians, he says whatever he has to to get elected. It's also why he's labeled a RINO - Republican In Name Only.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  68. Re:Where's the president by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    Never mind that many employees were training themselves, getting certified and leaving for better paying jobs at competitors anyway.

    So do the math. Which is better, from the employer's perspective: Paying to train employees and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors, or letting the employees cover the cost of that training themselves?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  69. Oracle H1B applications by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://www.myvisajobs.com/Visa...
    "Oracle America, Inc. has filed 2999 labor condition applications for H1B visa and 1876 labor certifications for green card from fiscal year 2014 to 2016. Oracle America was ranked 23 among all visa sponsors. Please note that 49 LCA for H1B Visa and 102 LC for green card have been denied or withdrawn during the same period."

    So, wonder what this will say for 2017? And wonder if these H1Bs were let go before the layoffs?

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  70. Enterprise & custom hardware [Re:Good Riddance by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's not the they sell "bureaucracy", it's that they lock you in and charge too much.

    Their products are indeed targeted toward "enterprise" applications, where you want stability and reliability, which is sometimes called "bureaucracy". If you are a smallish risk-taking start-up, then Oracle products are probably not for you.

    However, Oracle's problem in the enterprise arena is that they gradually trick you into paying an arm and leg over the longer run. Now that MS-SQL-Server is focusing more on the high-end, and there are open-source products like PostgreSQL and MariaDB, customers are migrating to alternatives, at least their low/mid-sized systems. Oracle will bleed customers if they continue their vice grip ways.

    I thought DB-centric hardware was a potential growth industry for them: custom-built database servers that are optimized for Oracle databases potentially could kick the competition's rear ends, kind of like how custom/dedicated neural net (AI) hardware is now "big".

    But for some reason it didn't pan out and they are laying off DB hardware people. Any server hardware experts out there who can explain why AI-dedicated hardware is paying off BUT NOT dedicated database hardware?

    Why can neural net custom/dedicated hardware kick generic server arse while DB hardware cannot? Is it something about RDBMS's in general, or does Oracle simply suck at hardware?

  71. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that were true it wouldn't be cost effective to export jobs to third world countries.

  72. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That how it goes. Get trained and jump to a new job. Some employers make you sign a contract. You must work x years if we pay for y class.

  73. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    If that were true it wouldn't be cost effective to export jobs to third world countries.

    Manufacturing is returning to the US because it's cheaper than China. The use of automation reduces the amount of labor needed to run the factories here.

  74. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He hasn't drone killed hundreds of innocent people in the last few days so he's already doing better than the previous two administrations.

  75. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    So do the math.

    I find your lack of math skills disturbing. ;)

    Paying to train employees and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors, or letting the employees cover the cost of that training themselves?

    You left out the last part of employees training themselves: "and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors." Either way the employee leaves and the resulting turnover cost more in money to find a replacement than an existing employee.

  76. Re:Where's the president by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Paywalled...... Sucks, I would have loved to read that. Oh well. I guess if I wanna afford to read the Wall Street Journal I better Check. These. Out.. Instead.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  77. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Paywalled...... Sucks, I would have loved to read that.

    Or read it on Yahoo for free.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-factories-working-again-factory-170300301.html

  78. Re:Where's the president by unixisc · · Score: 2

    He's Right wing on some things, and Left wing on others. Yeah, he supports LGBT rights, while on abortion, his current stance supports banning late term abortions, except for the usual rape, incest & life of the mother. He's also opposed to publicly funding abortions, hence the Mexico City executive order of today

    His trade policy is arguably Left Wing, although I've seen plenty of Conservatives switch over to his side: the Tom Friedman arguments don't hold water w/ people when they start losing their jobs Left and Right. But on most issues - like Law & Order, Border Security, Immigration, National Security, Extreme Vetting, those policies are very much Right Wing. His policy on Russia - dunno whether it qualifies as Left Wing, since Putin was ex-KGB, or Right Wing, since Putin is Russian Nationalist. But his anti-Muslim geopolitical stance is pretty much anathema to Leftists just about everywhere.

  79. Regular occurance by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

    As someone who once worked for a company led by a former Oracle Exec, this is par for the course. Larry Ellison is legendary for his "environment of fear" where they lay people off every 6 months both to keep people afraid for their jobs, and to pump up bonus money for the middle management above the people in question.

    Happened at the company I worked for, and though I was ostensibly safe due to my skill set, I finally got sick of watching good people that I had worked with for over a decade that I knew were doing good work being laid off to meet a quota.

    Fuck Oracle. Fuck Larry Ellison, and fuck every exec that learned that horse shit from him.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  80. Re:Where's the president by Marquis231 · · Score: 1

    To get around the paywall simply search on google "U.S. Factories Are Working Again; Factory Workers, Not So Much" under 'News' and follow the link. Prest! Paywall bypassed. Works on most every major news site.

  81. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, they used to. I got hired on at Sun in 1998 after doing PC administration for a few years. I wanted to learn Unix, was willing to take a job on the lower rung of the ladder to get the experience, and they were happy to get someone who knew the difference between a CPU and a keyboard, was educable as I had a biz degree and a Netware cert (that never used). I also have good people skills to do the kind of customer support one got from companies back in that time period, and that Sun prided itself on.

    They sent me to training locally and in California and paid for the certs in Solaris 2.6, which was the newest one at the time. You were also obligated, at that time, to do at least 40 hours of training per year either at SunEd or engineering brownbags or whatever. Later on, requirements included getting the Solaris Networking cert or Java, your choice. All on the company, all on their time.

    What companies don't need now, which they did then, was a massive group of US people to do this work. Now the work can be done by Rajeev in India as easily as it can be done by Roger in Indiana. H1-Bs, and all that. There is no incentive for companies to train. However: if these manufacturing jobs are really, really begging then maybe that will come around again.