Slashdot Mirror


Oracle Lays Off More Than 1,000 Employees (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader writes: According to the Mercury News, Oracle is laying off approximately 450 employees in its Santa Clara hardware systems division. Reports at The Layoff, a discussion board for technology business firings, claim about 1,800 employees company-wide are being pink-slipped. Oracle claims the company isn't closing the Santa Clara facility with this reduction in force. Instead, "Oracle is refocusing its Hardware Systems business, and for that reason, has decided to lay off certain of its employees in the Hardware Systems Division."

92 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Good bye to Solaris by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like this is the end of Sun SPARC and Solaris.

    1. Re:Good bye to Solaris by nbritton · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Looks like this is the end of Sun SPARC and Solaris.

      Good riddance if you ask me, it was getting quite antiquated relative to Linux. Now we just need to kill off AIX. Hopefully everyone will standardize around Linux and BSD.

    2. Re:Good bye to Solaris by WolfWalker545 · · Score: 1

      AIX is easier to administer than Linux.

    3. Re:Good bye to Solaris by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Solaris we already knew from the post about Solaris 12 a few days back, so now, this seals it for the SPARC as well. The Sun part of Oracle is dead

    4. Re:Good bye to Solaris by nbritton · · Score: 2

      AIX is easier to administer than Linux.

      AIX is an abomination. ODM, smitty? Umm no thanks. I liked the POWER platform though.

    5. Re:Good bye to Solaris by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      SPARC/Solaris is mainly used for legacy systems that are too expensive to port to x86, or where the source or expertise to do the port no longer exist. It would be insane to use S/S for any new project. So it is a dwindling market, and it just passed the point where it is no longer profitable to develop new hardware. The existing systems will continue to be available, but they will fall further and further behind and eventually fade away.

    6. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ridicule AIX if you must, but the fact remains that I've never had an AIX system fail to boot for me due to an init system failure, while I've experienced multiple such problems with Linux due to systemd.

      AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, and FreeBSD all have their place, and it's when reliability and stability are a must. Linux, especially now with the systemd nonsense that's going on, cannot compete with them.

    7. Re:Good bye to Solaris by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Oracle wanted to kill off sun - look at how many parts of sun tech they've crapped all over since they bought it. This is just the latest.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Linux kernel based operating systems are decades behind Solaris.
      When will Linux get a real memory manager? (current memory manager equal to congress's budgets - spend more than you have and kill off important things like education to pay for congressional vacations, healthcare and lifetime salaries).
      When will Linux get dtrace?
      When will Linux get a filesystem / volume manager that gets even close to being as good as ZFS?

      As I said, Linux kernel based operating systems are toys for tots, not real production environments.

    9. Re:Good bye to Solaris by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      Are we still talking about Solaris, or NetWare? :)

    10. Re:Good bye to Solaris by n7ytd · · Score: 2

      Amen to this... what Solaris is good at, it is shockingly good at.

      Linux's internals look like the worst possible design-by-committee abomination possible.

      The problem is that all the cool kids are using Linux, and Solaris has been dying on the vine for years. Unless you're buying hardware from Oracle, it's getting increasingly difficult to find drivers supported on Solaris; vendors are not investing the time and effort to support their new hardware on the 20-year old Solaris platform. At least, that's what my experience supporting x86 Solaris 10 has been...

    11. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Yep, sad to say, Solaris is a much much better system than, say, this Linux thing. Does it have challenges? Sure. But compared to x86 hardware, Solaris/SPARC just runs circles around it, although more expensive circles.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    12. Re:Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      SPARC/Solaris or AIX based systems would be what I'd still base anything system critical on, at least until a couple of weeks ago. x86/Linux just doesn't cut it. I remember I had a Solaris box in a closet that ran consistently I actually forgot to reboot it for 5 years. The only reason I did wind up rebooting it was because it's memory got upgraded because certain functions got a little slower over time as things grew. Quadrupling memory (memory got both cheaper and larger in the meantime) and boom - back to like it was new. x86 Linux systems, at least pre-systemd, were ok but still require some hand-holding. More than 180 days of uptime wasn't really in the cards. No clue on systemd systems, I won't run one until I have no choice.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    13. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Yup, as all here know I'm a BSD neckbeard but there's a different between industrial-strength OSes like AIX and Solaris and those where basically one guy can come along and fuck things up. Yeah, you guessed, not a fan of systemD

    14. Re:Good bye to Solaris by gmack · · Score: 1

      I doubt it was intentional. Oracle is just running their acquisitions the same way they run their database division. The problem is that it's much easier to change hardware/OS than it is to change databases and where I work, that's what happened. We can't dump the Oracle DB (there will be no new projects on it though) but we already stopped buying their hardware after they raised the prices. We had a blade system with a dead blade, Oracle demanded $50k to replace our blade, we threw out the blade chassis instead since at that price, we could just buy a full sized server from someone else.

    15. Re: Good bye to Solaris by bmo · · Score: 1

      I've never seen problems booting due to systemd

      Systemd is pants-on-head retarded when dealing with Network Manager and waking from sleep. It /never/ reactivates the network.

      It is also pants-on-head retarded when a sound service won't start and it will just fucking /wait/ there while it won't start, instead of just failing it and moving on.

      These are issues I've personally had to deal with. With Ubuntu LTS, no less.

      And the whole point of systemd, so I've been told, is to make it /easier/ for workstation users. I don't see any more ease over sysvinit. Systemd is a solution looking for a problem, as far as I can tell. Unfortunately everyone is under the spell of Red Hat and Poettering these days.

      This off-topic post was brought to you by the letters F, U, B, A, and R.

      --
      BMO

    16. Re:Good bye to Solaris by WolfWalker545 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I admin AIX and Linux, I hardly ever use SMIT. Everything done through SMIT can be done using the command line, although the syntax is often obscure, but it's also all logged, so you can easily just script the operation in the future. AIX 7.2 now has live kernel updates, which is going to push uptimes even longer, especially combined with live partition mobility. Only hard failures I've had of AIX systems were when both my primary AND secondary storage arrays panicked (gotta love when management goes cheap and bleeding edge). Even then, I was able to recover the vast majority of my partitions without having to rebuild them.

    17. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I also have seen what a problem with mounting due to systemd can cause.

      Whether it would have recovered after 5 minutes I cannot say - I cannot afford the downtime, especially when there's no explicit report as to what the hangup is. Besides, what's this about "the big advantage of systemd is faster boots" if it wants to park itself for 5 minutes?

      While there are some significant advantages that a theoretical systemd (i.e., one that confined itself to process management instead of Universe+dog) would have over sysV init, the actual difference is that sysV would generally let you come up - degraded and defective - but at least up enough to work on things, whereas systemd just sits there being useless,

    18. Re: Good bye to Solaris by gmack · · Score: 1

      1 They fixed the "not saying anything" bit years ago. 2 I would rather they retry in case the disk is slow coming back online (some of SANs I just phased out were really slow) 3 The timeout is configurable.

    19. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 2

      " x86/Linux just doesn't cut it. I remember I had a Solaris box in a closet that ran consistently I actually forgot to reboot it for 5 years. The only reason I did wind up rebooting it was because it's memory got upgraded because certain functions got a little slower over time as things grew. Quadrupling memory (memory got both cheaper and larger in the meantime) and boom - back to like it was new. x86 Linux systems, at least pre-systemd, were ok but still require some hand-holding. More than 180 days of uptime wasn't really in the cards. No clue on systemd systems, I won't run one until I have no choice."

      What nonsense.

      The uptime of our production Linux servers running on Dell PowerEdge, HP ProLiant, Sun "Galaxy" amd/intel servers or now Cisco UCS is limited only by the application of kernel or glibc securuty updates.

      Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.

      We are migrating (more than 50% done) most workloads to VMs running on Red Hat Enterprise Virtualisation, with 90%+ VMs running RHEL7. Systemd has been a total non-issue. I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...

    20. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      "Systemd is pants-on-head retarded when dealing with Network Manager and waking from sleep. It /never/ reactivates the network."

      In over 3 years running a distro using systemd, I've never seen this problem. All network interfaces work correctly on resume (except the 3G modem that needs its driver reloaded, but this is a driver problem).

      "It is also pants-on-head retarded when a sound service won't start and it will just fucking /wait/ there while it won't start, instead of just failing it and moving on."

      Never seen this one either. Sound mainly just works, including switching streams to my bluetooth headphones when connected.

      "These are issues I've personally had to deal with. With Ubuntu"

      Ah, Debian/Ubuntu users complaining about systemd. Why is it the Fedora/SUSE/CentOS/RHEL/Arch/Mageia users don't have these problems? Maybe Debian/Ubuntu-specific issues with their systemd migration/implementation?

    21. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.... I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...

      5 years? Seriously? You're running on an 5 year old kernel with multiple known issues (TLS, OpenSSL, etc)? I hope they're firewalled well. As for systemd, you must not be very well versed in it. SSH Fails, NTP magically fixed a service startup issue, no one knows why, and just a general list of why systemd sucks. And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks. You're in RH land with supported versions, so it's likely that these problems, when they crop up, are offloaded as RH issues and you just monitor a trouble ticket. Lucky you. I guess I wouldn't care in that scenario either, as it's SEP.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    22. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.... I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...

      5 years? Seriously? You're running on an 5 year old kernel with multiple known issues (TLS, OpenSSL, etc)?

      I didn't say they don't get any updates at all. They just don't have kernel updates applied. There are multiple firewalls protecting these specific servers from hostile users/networks, and 90% of the people who have any access at all (e.g. HTTPS access) have sudo rights to run various things as root on them anyway. The only systems that have any firewall access to them are the other monitoring servers, and all the monitoring software is kept up-to-date.

      As for systemd, you must not be very well versed in it. SSH Fails,

      Yes, some versions of systemd introducing new features may have bugs. Only immature distros would push such versions out to users of stable releases.

      NTP

      Using timesyncd isn't mandatory. The distro I use on my laptop doesn't use it, RHEL7.3 doesn't ship it.

      magically fixed a service startup issue, no one knows why,

      Doesn't seem like anyone could reproduce that on other versions (shipped in stable distros, or current).

      and just a general list of why systemd sucks.

      Of the 5 major complaints, 3 are about the journal. There are some advantages to it, and some disadvantages, and I think systemd should support not using journald at all, but you can avoid relying on the journal itself by forwarding to syslog and disabling storage.

      Regarding giving block devices for filesystems listed as required in /etc/fstab, this is a conscious design decision that is required in environments with complex storage (many storage arrays in a complex storage area network). The alternative (with e.g. sysvinit) is to have your production database servers fail to come up at boot time because the init system didn't give enough time for all 100 LUNs to appear so that it could mount the filesystems required to let the database start. It is really fun to have to be woken up to get such systems back up after a rack has tripped because then engineer on standby can't figure out what to do, I'd rather have systemd do the right thing. As far as I know, the default timeouts have been reduced (systemd wasn't hanging though ... it was waiting for devices it was told were required to appear) and provide more information on why it is waiting.

      The 4th issue is cosmetic, and applies to most kernel drivers ... only dracut namespaces its parameters (rd.xxx).

      And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks.

      Yes, it is trivial to find old bugs that are fixed, and FUD complaints from systemd haters about behaviour that has been improved.

      You're in RH land with supported versions, so it's likely that these problems, when they crop up, are offloaded as RH issues and you just monitor a trouble ticket. Lucky you. I guess I wouldn't care in that scenario either, as it's SEP.

      Our production servers run Red Hat. We haven't needed to log a ticket for anything systemd-related.

      My workstation, my laptop, and the desktop my wife uses at home run a different distro not associated with Red Hat at all that switched to systemd long ago, and I have seen no issues there either.

    23. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks.

      Yes, it is trivial to find old bugs that are fixed, and FUD complaints from systemd haters about behaviour that has been improved.

      I'll note that with 1 "fixed" bug, the rest appeared to all be current. You give a specific instance where systemd helps you. Just one. IIRC, you should be able to achieve the same effect in the other scripts by merely checking and waiting on pieces to come up (admittedly, this has been more than a few years, my memory may be hazy as to its simplicity) You also specify several workarounds outside of systemd to deal with things others don't like. The thing you don't address is why systemd, purportedly a startup management system, appears to have taken over as almost a full OS. I personally think that's my largest argument against it - it's monolithic, which has ALWAYS been a bad model.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    24. Re: Good bye to Solaris by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      You give a specific instance where systemd helps you. Just one.

      No, I was responding to one of the examples provided as to why 'systemd sucks' in that it seemed (in the past) to hang at boot if there was a bad entry in /etc/fstab. There is good justification for what systemd is doing (and sysvinit doesn't assist the admin at all in this regard, so the sysvinit user is left to modify all sorts of scripts like rc.sysinit - that will be overwritten by a software update - to resolve these problems).

      As someone who has also been involved in packaging software for linux distros (and for internal use), I have no problem writing an init script, but I have also seen the many traps that inexperienced users will fall into when writing/modifying an init script. Systemd has done a lot to standardise the way services must behave and provide configuration-based customisation for the most common types of customisation required, such as setting limits, limited configuration required of the service, running a script before starting the daemon etc.

      IIRC, you should be able to achieve the same effect in the other scripts by merely checking and waiting on pieces to come up (admittedly, this has been more than a few years, my memory may be hazy as to its simplicity)

      I (and you) might be able to, but at present I doubt any of my colleagues would be able to do it correctly without leaving a booby trap for the next sysadmin.

      You also specify several workarounds outside of systemd to deal with things others don't like.

      So, not using an optional service that systemd provides but doesn't require is a workaround outside of systemd?

      The thing you don't address is why systemd, purportedly a startup management system, appears to have taken over as almost a full OS.

      So in the past we have run DJBs service tools to supervise processes that are prone to die regularly, but then you can end up with conflicts with what sysvinit wants to do vs what sv_stat, sv etc. want to do, and you have no dependency tracking between the services supervised by the DJBware and the init system (so qmail starts accepting mail before the NFS mailstores are mounted, and bounces the emails until someone notices the alert and mounts the mailstores). Then you have services run by xinetd (started by sysvinit), again with little coordination between them and other services. To me it does make sense to have one daemon that takes care of launching and killing all services. Then again, there is the argument about one cgroup controller (which was apparently the primary reason for systemd in the first place), and as far as I know there isn't a competing init system that has comprehensive built-in native support for cgroups.

      It is unfortunate that a lot of other tooling that pre-dates systemd has so much bit-rot that the systemd developers seem to think writing a replacement (e.g. systemd-login) is better than asking the developers (of e.g. ConsoleKit, which itself was a replacement for something, pam_console?) to fix the bugs, but I don't think the intention is to make systemd an OS. And it is quite modular, many of their newer tools are optional (where possible).

    25. Re: Good bye to Solaris by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      No, I was responding to one of the examples provided as to why 'systemd sucks' in that it seemed (in the past) to hang at boot if there was a bad entry in /etc/fstab.

      It'd be nice if there were dependencies marked and things could move on while it waited. I don't recall if systemd allows for this now. I obviously haven't looked at a system in a while, and this only takes me down memory lane.

      [init scripts]

      I (and you) might be able to, but at present I doubt any of my colleagues would be able to do it correctly without leaving a booby trap for the next sysadmin.

      It is true that init script editing can be obtuse. Then again, you should know what you're doing when you're mucking about with the configuration of enterprise systems. If your colleagues can't do it correctly, perhaps they shouldn't be tasked with those types of jobs. I wouldn't expect a web dev to configure an HA cluster of DBs. I wouldn't expect a DBA to edit JavaScript for a webapp. You should be good in your areas of expertise, or you shouldn't be hired for those tasks. Regardless of whatever management's smoking this week, people are not interchangeable cogs, and expertise is a real differentiator.

      So, not using an optional service that systemd provides but doesn't require is a workaround outside of systemd?

      Like I said, it's been a while, but I don't recall it being optional when I looked at it.

      It is unfortunate that a lot of other tooling that pre-dates systemd has so much bit-rot that the systemd developers seem to think writing a replacement (e.g. systemd-login) is better than asking the developers (of e.g. ConsoleKit, which itself was a replacement for something, pam_console?) to fix the bugs, but I don't think the intention is to make systemd an OS. And it is quite modular, many of their newer tools are optional (where possible).

      I'll agree that it would have been nice to have a parallel initialization system created that allowed for dependencies. Systemd's supposed premise is valid, the implementation seems overly broad and all encompassing.

      systemd-login was the big WTF. To have something like Gnome completely dependent upon a system initialization tool seems completely fubar, doesn't it? What, pray tell, does a GUI have to do with system initialization, other than to be initialized by it? These are the types of things that drive people away from systemd. If it just initialized your system, ok, I can live with that. To infiltrate and essentially tie entire sets of software to your optional and non essential tool is what drives the systemd hate, and deservedly so.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  2. If Only... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only someone at the Oracle could have foretold this.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:If Only... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should have bought Borland, too. Oracle Delphi could have predicted this.

    2. Re:If Only... by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      It's sad when people don't remember wgere names come from. Like why Borland called it Delphi.

  3. It's oracle, so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel for the 500 lawyers, 200 managers, 50 directors, 149 assistant and one temp programmer needing to find a new job...

    1. Re:It's oracle, so... by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      No love for the Salespeople?

    2. Re:It's oracle, so... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Did he stutter.

  4. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks, Trump!

  5. Wonder how long before by oldgraybeard · · Score: 2

    The NEW Oracle Advanced Hardware Systems Division, India opens ;)

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Ok black list from using H1B's for some time unles by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Ok black list from using H1B's for some time unless they hire USC's first.

  8. Re:Where's the president by geekmux · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Where's Trump when you need him?

    Simple math shows that Trump is likely irrelevant.

    California salaries > Indian salaries + Trump import tax

  9. Math by wbr1 · · Score: 1
    1000 jobs. Let us assume 100k per year per job cost to company. This is probably higher. This is 100 Million per year.

    Looks like good old Larry can fund himself another megayacht now.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  10. Re:Surprised? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oracle is less and less a software company and becoming more about making sales, then gouging their clients.

    That has been true for 30 years. I remember making an inquiry in the early 1990s, and instead of giving me technical specs, they started badgering me for the name of the "decision maker". When I finally relented and gave them the name of my (non-technical) boss, they ignored me, and started calling him using pushy tactics that would make a door-to-door vacuum cleaner salesman proud.

  11. Re:Pink-slipped? by slew · · Score: 1

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pink%20slipped

    My favorite pseudo-etymology is that your employer gives you back your pink slip, so you can sell your soul to another company...

  12. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Informative
    They better watch it - Foxconn is thinking of opening a $7 Billion display screen factory in the USA, on top of $50 Billion, and you know darned well that fear of Trump putting duties on them is part of it.

    Foxconn, the world's largest contract electronics maker, is considering setting up a display-making plant in the United States in an investment that would exceed $7 billion, company chairman and chief executive Terry Gou said on Sunday.

    The plans come after U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to put "America First" in his inauguration speech on Friday, prompting Gou to warn about the rise of protectionism and a trend for politics to underpin economic development.

    You really have to admit that 30-50k new jobs is significant.

    Gou said he told Son that the United States has no panel-making industry but it is the second-largest market for televisions. An investment for a display plant would exceed $7 billion and could create about 30,000-50,000 jobs, Gou told Son.

    You can hate on him all you want, but if fear of Trump can bring manufacturing jobs back, the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did. As for the rest, you should all wish for more success stories, despite your personal opinions. It's not like any other president hasn't been an asshole. Why? "It's the economy, stupid!"

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  13. something adds up for once. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    the question isnt when will oracle stop supporting sparc, or when is solaris going to finally die, but what was it that Larry saw at the mega-yacht store that day that was worth the salary of 1800 employees...and does it light up?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  14. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am really hoping that Trump is simply a genius and manages to have the cake and eat it too. There is the slim-but-now-not-non-existent chance that we can: 1) still stand for free trade, 2) end up with most of the high-tech infrastructure construction, rendering 3) the US a manufacturing powerhouse and export king. If Trump threatens enough that people actually build *mega-factory* in America, America will actually be best poised to export *megaFactoryProducts*. That said, it is going to be really hard to get there by threats alone.

  15. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    [...] the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did.

    Except Trump isn't going to bring back the manufacturing jobs of yesteryear. A new factory today will hire a few dozen workers to handle a machine that does the work of 1,500 workers.

  16. Re:Monoculture == Stagnation by arth1 · · Score: 2

    A Fedora installation used to feel different from, say, a Debian installation. These days the biggest difference is whether you type "apt-get" or "yum" to manage packages.

    That was sooo last year. This year, Fedora uses "dnf" instead of yum. It only has a subset of the functionality that yum provided, but it's new!!!1! and what's missing will the there Real Soon Now.

    I think the name dnf is an apt name...

  17. Mod parent up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oracle Delphi could have predicted this.

    Who says a Liberal Arts education/knowledge is worthless!!!!

    Look how it has enriched our lives. Liberal arts is history, art, the finer stuff .... and the neurosciences geeks would argue that ALL human knowledge is interrelated.

    I for one breezed through data structures because I used music analogies. Easiest 'A' in a two week Summer session ever.

    1. Re:Mod parent up!!! by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I took Symbolic Logic from the philosophy department, which was labeled "humanities" in my school, but seemingly would fall into your "liberal arts" category. It was extremely applicable to programming and database logic.

  18. Re:Where's the president by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They better watch it - Foxconn is thinking of opening a $7 Billion display screen factory in the USA, on top of $50 Billion, and you know darned well that fear of Trump putting duties on them is part of it.

    Nope. I don't know or believe that for a second. See, I'm not dumb. I can actually read that Foxconn had plans before Trump even threw his hat into the ring.

    More importantly, I dislike governance by fear, and what I also know is that if ANYBODY on the left-wing side said anything like what Trump purports to do, the Republicans would shake in their boots at the vileness of government interfering with the free market, and most importantly, I know that the suffering factory workers in Asia, whose plight I also care about, will not be in Trump's thoughts. So not only will he be ignoring real problems, the political allies in the legislature won't be genuinely interested in doing the thing, at most, they'll appear to do it.

    More likely, they'll get fed up with him, and toss him on his ass as soon as he gives them an opening.

    You really have to admit that 30-50k new jobs is significant.

    In a country of over 300 million? Nope. In a country with a workforce of 160 million or so. Nope. Heck, I still remember the right-wing shills complaining about people leaving the workforce and not even looking for jobs, thanks to Obama. Now you want me to praise Trump for a pittance?

    Says more about you than the economy.

    You can hate on him all you want, but if fear of Trump can bring manufacturing jobs back, the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did. As for the rest, you should all wish for more success stories, despite your personal opinions. It's not like any other president hasn't been an asshole. Why? "It's the economy, stupid!"

    Ah, here's the thing, Trump won't bring them back, but he will absolutely insist he is, so the naive will be thinking the world is changing for the better, and all too easily believe that it's the GREAT TRUMP who is saving them, even as the Emperor's lack of clothes becomes apparent.

    I agree there will be lots of "success stories" but that's the problem. See, it won't be true stories. It'll be works of fiction. And the kind of asshole that Trump is, is one that is very dangerous, though perhaps you might not be aware of it. He's the conniving deceitful sort that gets a roaring crowd behind him as he convinces Democracy to sign its death warrant.

    He's very dangerous.

  19. Tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Alternative Fact: Trump supporters are well endowed.

  20. Oracle, what a joke. by Jack9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a known quantity. Oracle rep lie sell their substandard product with shitty support, piecemeal features, and a huge bill. You deserve what you get. Almost as bad as contracting with IBM, but not quite. IBM has decent support.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:Oracle, what a joke. by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'm not hip to IBMs shitlord status anymore, thank god.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  21. Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Trump will claim this too as "made available 1000 highly skilled workers to Make us great again"

  22. Cisco model... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Oracle is following the Cisco model of announcing layoffs of Americans at the front door while bringing in H1B workers through the back door.

  23. Re:Where's the president by lgw · · Score: 2

    There are over a million skilled manufacturing jobs unfilled right now. There's plenty to manufacture, but skilled workers willing to do blue-collar work are hard to find. Sure, we'll never return to the old days, "but the good old days weren't always good, and tomorrow ain't as bad as it seems".

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  24. Is Trump taking credit for this one too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This one combined with Microsoft's layoffs has already cancelled out the few hundred jobs Trump was so proud of keeping in the US a few weeks. Maybe the Oracle employees can get a job at Carrier.

    1. Re:Is Trump taking credit for this one too by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Good thing Obama is gone. Now this can stop.

  25. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    There's plenty to manufacture, but skilled workers willing to do blue-collar work are hard to find.

    Is the problem a lack of skilled workers willing to do the job or employers unwilling to train non-skilled workers?

    Based on my experience in Fortune 500 companies, employers are looking for people who already have the necessary job skills and could start without any training. One manager told me that he could train me but it would be a waste of his time as I would only leave to get a better paying job at a competitor. Never mind that many employees were training themselves, getting certified and leaving for better paying jobs at competitors anyway.

  26. Re:Where's the president by lgw · · Score: 1

    Employers don't train. Never have. Not really their core competency. The failure lies elsewhere, but it is a failure, and one we must address as a society as unskilled jobs dwindle away.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  27. Re:Where's the president by Desler · · Score: 1

    Companies "think" about doing things all the time. Get back to us when it actually happens. Secondly, even if it does happen why do you presume Foxconn won't just heavily automate it so as to hire as a few people as possible?

  28. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Employers don't train. Never have. Not really their core competency.

    That's because bean counters on Wall Street declared training as an unnecessary expense back in the 1980's. Since then it has become the public school system responsibility to train students into employees. If you don't know how to flip burgers out of high school, you're unemployable for the rest of your life.

  29. So long SPARC? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I guess this coupled with the announcement about Solaris last week means Oracle is finally finished squeezing the last pennies out of the SPARC/Solaris architecture. Admittedly it's very rare to see new implementations of a proprietary UNIX...every place I've dealt with in the last few years is trying to rid themselves of all the legacy code and hardware that keeps them on Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, etc.

    I wonder what kind of cost/benefit calculation they came up with. The company I work for has a bunch of mainframe stuff still in production, and they pay a king's ransom to CA to license a package that hasn't changed in ages, but must keep running no matter what. I can't imagine Oracle is giving away Solaris and SPARC support contracts and licenses...it must be a massive amount and certainly enough to keep a bunch of Solaris engineers on staff to fix the occasional bug. 1000 people is a lot though -- I wonder how many of those were in sales? Salesmen are expensive in terms of all the meals, rounds of golf and strip club visits they have to give away to customers.

    You know what would suck? Oracle kills the old Sun, then miraculously opens a new office in a "low cost geography" so they can keep squeezing for another 20 years! This is what HP did with OpenVMS for a long time before they got tired of supporting it and sold it to a third party.

  30. Re:Where's the president by lgw · · Score: 1

    Not just the 80s - employers have never been willing to train for skilled labor, unless you go back to old-school apprenticeships, starting at age 12 and replacing later schooling. With some relevant training, employers will generally soak of the cost of the last 10%, just as you do when hiring someone from a non-identical job elsewhere. But that takes proving that you've already learned the basics, or a similar skill (and thus proving you can learn).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  31. Re:Monoculture == Stagnation by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    and what's missing will the there Real Soon Now

    Does dnf stand for "definitely not finished"?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  32. Re:Where's the president by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

    So why not "outsource" to somewhere cheaper in the center of the country. Just pick a breadbasket state and go for it. The map here is a good reference: How Much $100 is really worth in every state. Think of it like playing with exchange rates, but domestically.

  33. The bubble is bursting by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

    Hope you saved some money

  34. Re:Where's the president by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

    I can actually read that Foxconn had plans before Trump even threw his hat into the ring

    Cite your source, please. I think the jobs issue is much more complex than Trump lets on. But, the last 4 presidents certainly weren't friends of manufacturing. I do see the Foxconn commitment as "fear of Trump". But, I can be convinced otherwise should you find an article demonstrating something counter to Reuters article.

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  35. Re: Monoculture == Stagnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does not function?

  36. Re:Where's the president by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    The infrastructure and support staff it takes to manage what the bots are doing takes a little more than "a few dozen workers" in those factories. Think shipping, raw materials, management... that's why they have such large parking lots. Full automation is coming, buts it not quite here yet.... there may not be many assembly line jobs left, but forklift drivers, automation specialists, various clerks and faces... they still put a LOT of people to work.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  37. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    The estimate is 30,000 to 50,000 new jobs. Not a few dozen workers. And that's only the beginning

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  38. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Small employers have always trained people on the job.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  39. Re:Where's the president by gtall · · Score: 1

    BS. This is just Foxconn playing el Presidente Tweety's ego. He's such a rube.

  40. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The infrastructure and support staff it takes to manage what the bots are doing takes a little more than "a few dozen workers" in those factories.

    Not according to The Wall Street Journal.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-factories-are-working-again-factory-workers-not-so-much-1482080400

  41. Re:Where's the president by gtall · · Score: 1

    First off, it the article said "could", not will. This is just a play to Trump's ego, he's such an easy mark.

  42. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The estimate is 30,000 to 50,000 new jobs.

    For American or foreign workers? When I tried to break into electronic assembly work in Silicon Valley in the 1990's, all the work was done by Filipinos who came over to the U.S. to work these jobs. Being the only white guy in line when a company was hiring, I was told to go away when I asked for an application.

  43. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    First, you are full of shit. Foxconn originally planned to reduce overall employment at their factories by replacing workers with robots, while building new factories, so they could increase production while reducing headcount. It didn't work out quite how they hoped. Turns out it's easier to replace white-collar jobs with Watson. When AI learns how to code AI, the trend will accelerate.

    Also, the reuters story I linked to also talks about Foxconn's plans for another $50 billion in investment - that's a total of new jobs than all the employed in Wyoming.

    Sanders would have been better - far better - but Clinton would have been worse.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  44. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    The estimates of employee count are Foxconn's.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  45. Re:Where's the president by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    Trump is actually very left-leaning on gays and lesbians, transsexuals, and abortion. What he says now and what he's done in the past are contradictory. I'd say actions speak louder than words. Like all politicians, he says whatever he has to to get elected. It's also why he's labeled a RINO - Republican In Name Only.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  46. Re:Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember next time. "I am the decision maker for my 200M division, however I haven't had enough hookers and blow to make a decision in weeks"

    Captcha: expunge

  47. Re:Where's the president by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    Never mind that many employees were training themselves, getting certified and leaving for better paying jobs at competitors anyway.

    So do the math. Which is better, from the employer's perspective: Paying to train employees and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors, or letting the employees cover the cost of that training themselves?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  48. Oracle H1B applications by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://www.myvisajobs.com/Visa...
    "Oracle America, Inc. has filed 2999 labor condition applications for H1B visa and 1876 labor certifications for green card from fiscal year 2014 to 2016. Oracle America was ranked 23 among all visa sponsors. Please note that 49 LCA for H1B Visa and 102 LC for green card have been denied or withdrawn during the same period."

    So, wonder what this will say for 2017? And wonder if these H1Bs were let go before the layoffs?

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  49. Enterprise & custom hardware [Re:Good Riddance by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It's not the they sell "bureaucracy", it's that they lock you in and charge too much.

    Their products are indeed targeted toward "enterprise" applications, where you want stability and reliability, which is sometimes called "bureaucracy". If you are a smallish risk-taking start-up, then Oracle products are probably not for you.

    However, Oracle's problem in the enterprise arena is that they gradually trick you into paying an arm and leg over the longer run. Now that MS-SQL-Server is focusing more on the high-end, and there are open-source products like PostgreSQL and MariaDB, customers are migrating to alternatives, at least their low/mid-sized systems. Oracle will bleed customers if they continue their vice grip ways.

    I thought DB-centric hardware was a potential growth industry for them: custom-built database servers that are optimized for Oracle databases potentially could kick the competition's rear ends, kind of like how custom/dedicated neural net (AI) hardware is now "big".

    But for some reason it didn't pan out and they are laying off DB hardware people. Any server hardware experts out there who can explain why AI-dedicated hardware is paying off BUT NOT dedicated database hardware?

    Why can neural net custom/dedicated hardware kick generic server arse while DB hardware cannot? Is it something about RDBMS's in general, or does Oracle simply suck at hardware?

  50. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    If that were true it wouldn't be cost effective to export jobs to third world countries.

    Manufacturing is returning to the US because it's cheaper than China. The use of automation reduces the amount of labor needed to run the factories here.

  51. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    So do the math.

    I find your lack of math skills disturbing. ;)

    Paying to train employees and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors, or letting the employees cover the cost of that training themselves?

    You left out the last part of employees training themselves: "and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors." Either way the employee leaves and the resulting turnover cost more in money to find a replacement than an existing employee.

  52. Re:Where's the president by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Paywalled...... Sucks, I would have loved to read that. Oh well. I guess if I wanna afford to read the Wall Street Journal I better Check. These. Out.. Instead.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  53. Re:Where's the president by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Paywalled...... Sucks, I would have loved to read that.

    Or read it on Yahoo for free.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-factories-working-again-factory-170300301.html

  54. Re:Is Fujitsu in the tank? by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Or Fujitsu could go w/ something like OpenBSD or FreeBSD on SPARC, and leverage off the community

  55. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Trump would probably find killing Oracle would be like one of his four bankrupcies. Like, say, the Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino one. He can let Oracle go belly up & claim that HE didn't go belly up

  56. Re:Next Up: MAGA By Killing Oracle by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Uh, the GOP is pretty much at the mercy of Trump. There are quite a few factions in the house - Ryan loyalists, the Freedom Caucus, the Cruz conservatives, the Rand Paul Libertarians... so Trump can form alliances w/ any of these groups if the Congressional leadership tries to do anything to sabotage him

  57. Re:Where's the president by unixisc · · Score: 2

    He's Right wing on some things, and Left wing on others. Yeah, he supports LGBT rights, while on abortion, his current stance supports banning late term abortions, except for the usual rape, incest & life of the mother. He's also opposed to publicly funding abortions, hence the Mexico City executive order of today

    His trade policy is arguably Left Wing, although I've seen plenty of Conservatives switch over to his side: the Tom Friedman arguments don't hold water w/ people when they start losing their jobs Left and Right. But on most issues - like Law & Order, Border Security, Immigration, National Security, Extreme Vetting, those policies are very much Right Wing. His policy on Russia - dunno whether it qualifies as Left Wing, since Putin was ex-KGB, or Right Wing, since Putin is Russian Nationalist. But his anti-Muslim geopolitical stance is pretty much anathema to Leftists just about everywhere.

  58. Regular occurance by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

    As someone who once worked for a company led by a former Oracle Exec, this is par for the course. Larry Ellison is legendary for his "environment of fear" where they lay people off every 6 months both to keep people afraid for their jobs, and to pump up bonus money for the middle management above the people in question.

    Happened at the company I worked for, and though I was ostensibly safe due to my skill set, I finally got sick of watching good people that I had worked with for over a decade that I knew were doing good work being laid off to meet a quota.

    Fuck Oracle. Fuck Larry Ellison, and fuck every exec that learned that horse shit from him.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  59. Re:Where's the president by Marquis231 · · Score: 1

    To get around the paywall simply search on google "U.S. Factories Are Working Again; Factory Workers, Not So Much" under 'News' and follow the link. Prest! Paywall bypassed. Works on most every major news site.

  60. Re:I just got pink slipped by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    If you worked at hardware or software at Sun you can start sending resumes to NVIDIA and Intel. I think they have some HQ in Santa Clara.