Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Discover Massive Networks of Fake Twitter Accounts (bbc.com)

mi writes: Turns out, there are researchers studying ways to identify bots on Twitter -- fake accounts used by individuals or groups for various purposes. They identified, what seems like a collection of 350,000 accounts, all of which share the same subtle characteristics: tweets coming from places where nobody lives; messages being posted only from Windows phones; exclusively including quotes from Star Wars novels. "Considering all the efforts already there in detecting bots, it is amazing that we can still find so many bots, much more than previous research," Dr Zhou, a senior lecturer from UCL, told the BBC. Juan Echeverria uncovered the massive networks by combing through a sample of 1% of Twitter users in order to get a better understanding of how people use the social network. He is now asking the public via a website and a Twitter account to report bots to get a better idea of how prevalent they are. Some bots are easy to spot as they likely have been created recently, have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages.

91 comments

  1. Why? by magarity · · Score: 2

    have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages

    So why bother setting it up? How does one monetize a twitterbot swarm of strange names with banal content?

    1. Re:Why? by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Because sheeple see some celebrity has 50,000 followers, so they need to follow too.

    2. Re:Why? by sexconker · · Score: 2

      1/3 spammer army, 1/3 in the hands of botnet operators to be sold off for use in trolling/harassment/activism campaigns, 1/3 Twitter inflating user numbers to get that sweet, sweet money.

      Social media - 50% of the accounts are bots, but 100% of the users are fake.

    3. Re:Why? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Imagine this: You have 350000 twitter-bots at your command. For the right price you can be hired to flood Twitter with whatever message you want.
      It's a social engineering tool. People are gullible. Regardless of the 'strange usernames' or any enigmatic content they're tweeting otherwise, if the average Twitter user sees 350000 retweets of a particular message, they're going to believe it's a Real Thing, and they'll probably retweet it themselves, giving it even more momentum and credibility. Instant viral content.

    4. Re:Why? by FudRucker · · Score: 2

      I follow two accounts, one is on the topic of Linux and the other is the topic of SDR Radios, and have nobody following me and i dont have a single tweat, i am a 100% lurker

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They spam links to their scams that get them money.

    6. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You may not have a tweek but you certainly have a twat

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are often used to sway public opinion by posting across many networks, to reach all kinds of people and demographics. This particular botnet is probably government sanctioned. NSA or GHCQ, typically "weighing in" on anti-Russian or anti-Chinese sentiments.

    8. Re:Why? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Imagine this: You have 350000 twitter-bots at your command. For the right price you can be hired to flood Twitter with whatever message you want.

      #MAGA

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Why? by PPH · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that your name isn't Chad.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    10. Re:Why? by operator_error · · Score: 1

      Not to be personal mind you, but why not use RSS feeds instead? I realize Twitter made it much easier than before, but here we're on /. and all. But seriously, I wonder why more people don't use RSS to monitor twitter feeds like the %$#@! POTUS, rather than 'subscribing' and somewhat identifying themselves; ...not to mention since I started with a good example, many of the citizenry have been actively blocked by the twitter-account-holder directly?

    11. Re:Why? by operator_error · · Score: 2

      This also helps to explain things: https://www.kcrw.com/news-cult...

    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if nobody's following your bot accounts, their activity can contribute to the "Trending" activity on the site. Retweets can help push real people towards real accounts by making a post look popular. Fake followers can inflate the perceived importance or integrity of an account.

      If you don't use Twitter, it all seems very silly but once you accept that Twitter actually influences people, the uses become pretty obvious.

    13. Re:Why? by rgmoore · · Score: 2

      For the right price you can be hired to flood Twitter with whatever message you want.

      Except that's of limited utility. A twitter feed only contains tweets by (or retweeted by) people the user is following, so tweeting by a bunch of bots with no followers won't flood the feeds of anyone else. You could use something like that to get a topic trending, but most people would ignore it once they realize it's just a bunch of bots tweeting the same message.

      It's much more likely to be an army of followers for hire. There are apparently people who will pay real money to get an army of fake twitter followers to make them look more impressive. It apparently even works. People pay more attention to tweeters with more followers, so getting a bunch of fake followers can actually help you to get real ones.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    14. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Politicians and celebrities like their accounts to reflect their standing in the community or fans taking an interest in new projects.
      If the politicians and celebrities are boring or their projects fail, happy people can be found online to create interest and keep the numbers up.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    15. Re:Why? by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      there are a few twitter accounts i bookmarked but i have not followed them because i want to visit them at my leisure

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    16. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #hillaryforprison

    17. Re:Why? by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      In all seriousness, I'd be surprised if the real number was below 80% for twitter. Most of the investors/shareholders - the ones who aren't actually involved in orchestrating the bots themselves that is - would be grabbing their torches and pitchforks if they knew.

    18. Re:Why? by Notabadguy · · Score: 0

      I follow no accounts, on no topics - nor do I have a single tweet. Nor do I have an account. In fact, I don't even get the point of twitter. Insert twit joke.

    19. Re:Why? by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      And those 35,000 twitter-bots spam a message to all the other twitter bots, fake accounts, and the occasional IRL tardface who owns a twitter account.

      I still don't see the point.

    20. Re:Why? by radl33t · · Score: 1

      I have a 8 year old twitter account with about 3 tweets. The platform is honestly not for me. It does not facilitate rational engagement. At its very best, it is a notification service.

    21. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike your other two posts, you missed the chance to misspell "tweet".

    22. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those 35,000 twitter-bots spam a message to all the other twitter bots, fake accounts, and the occasional IRL tardface who owns a twitter account.

      I still don't see the point.

      This article is light on details, but the report I saw said that the accounts appear to only have been used one time, and that other than random bits of text from some old 'Star Wars' novels, the only thing they had in common was they all were supposedly made from a "Windows Phone."
      So while it was probably just a test run, another possibility is that someone wanted to falsely inflate the statistics for how many people are using a Windows Phone.

      Another use of a network of such sockpuppet accounts is to influence trending stories by inserting the same hashtag at a random point in the tweet. Using an identical or nearly identical text string would make it a lot easier to spot this type of activity, so their bot controller was setup to just grab chunks of text out of a 'Dictionary', in this case some old Novels.

    23. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHy not grab some pussy instead? Feels a lot better than cold hard steel.

    24. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted washingtonpost and nytimes as bots.

    25. Re: Why? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Just make sure the woman is cool with it, like the President did, and there will be no issues. Except maybe millions of women will march on their local city to complain about how sexist you are for being a heterosexual male.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    26. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you even exist bro? Errr. do you even exist?

  2. The only question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is whether we're living in an age of dystopian fiction, juvenile fiction, or magical realism. Orwell, Huxley, Carroll, or J. L. Borges?

    Whoever it is, reality needs new writers.

    1. Re:The only question... by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Always at war, so its always 1984. Lots of escapist fun so a hint of Huxley. As for nonexistent writings, non-existent authors and translations, that would be the online world :)
      Fake accounts supporting average celebrities on social media is just something that adds to the fake fame.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  3. To win elections by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Twitter and Facebook played a yuge (pun) role in the last US Presidential elections. It'd be silly to ignore the effectiveness of large social networks in various kinds of propaganda. I'm sure that wasn't lost on anyone last year...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yep, Hillary won the popular vote, despite being an incredibly corrupt, deceitful, and sleazy person.

    2. Re:To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yea, Trump got elected because of all those Star Wars quotes.

      It's kind of pathetic how everything these days gets turned into a stab at Trump. The term paranoid raving lunatics comes to mind.

    3. Re:To win elections by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1, Troll

      One can only hope that they'll eventually get over the butt hurt affront to their SJW psyche and move on with their lives. It was funny for a couple of days, but now it's just tiresome.

    4. Re: To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Californians are more connected to "social media" and thus more brainwashed.

    5. Re: To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question though, is are you simply projecting?

      He won because people outside the sanctuary states, whose collective voting strength is (thankfully) equalized to that of the people in said sanctuary states, voted for him. And one of the reasons some of them voted that way is because they can't stand the flippant accusations of bigotry and that ad hominem bullshit your post encapsulates, and the last truly free speech they have left is the secret ballot. Lo and beyond, they had a lot to say. It's "The United States of America", not "New Califloridork n' the Nasty Rednecks". And they want to make it great again.

      CAPTCHA: impetus

    6. Re: To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what? Hilary lost! This means we can entirely stop talking about her, and actually focus on what Trump will actually be doing to "make America great again" - you know, actual policy discussion.

      So who wants to go first on what policies Trump will implement to help this core voting demographic (lower-income class rust belt people), given that manufacturing output levels are at an all time high for the U.S., while employing significantly fewer people, and with automation of factory work continuing to rise (figures put it at 8 jobs lost to automation per 1 lost to outsourcing).

      I'm all ears. If it's anything like "draining the swamp" to instill a bunch of people from Goldman Sachs (Cohn), Exxon-Mobile (Tillerson), career politicians (Priebus, Perry), family (Kushner), or just horribly unqualified billionaires (DeVos), perhaps these people should start using the rest of their money to buy lubricant for the inevitable ass-fucking they're about to receive.

    7. Re:To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Star Wars quotes are only there so that the account isn't just an empty account that never tweeted anything.
      The reason they do this is so that twitter can't just run a script and remove all accounts that haven't been used.
      I don't know it twitter bots were used during the election but the /r/The_Donald subreddit have had some pretty suspicious activity where most of the upvoting activity happens when the the US is asleep.
      If /r/The_Donald actually have any ties to Trump is anyone's guess considering the clusterfsck that that subreddit is.

    8. Re:To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's gone beyond tiresome. Pathetic would be a better word.

    9. Re: To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the formation of a Ministry if Truth? He is just short of that now with the gag orders being placed on federal (taxpayer funded) agencies and organizations.

    10. Re:To win elections by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Obama largely elected on Twitter as well? I seem to remember that he was considered hip because he used Twitter. I find it funny that demographically the same people are complaining about Trump now. (I realize that not literally the same people are complaining, it is just shorthand...)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    11. Re:To win elections by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Its all Obamas fault anyway. If he hadn't been so spineless he would have declared the Russian infiltration of US politics an act of war and voided the election.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  4. some are spammers by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    they post clickbait in the top trending tweats, i like to read through the top trending tweats and after a while i have learned to recognize them and i will report them, they usually use a cropped photo that links to their clickbait websites instead of just opening to show the full photo

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:some are spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      top trending tweats

      Twick or tweat!
      Smell my feat!
      Give me something
      Good to eet!

  5. wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some bots are easy to spot as they likely have been created recently, have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages.

    Wait a minute, that describes my Twitter account!

    1. Re: wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Help me Obi Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope!

  6. Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Next you'll be saying all the chicks with big fake tits and 1 month old profiles on facebook that just friended me arent real.

    1. Re:Omg by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Seriously? Next you'll be saying all the chicks with big fake tits and 1 month old profiles on facebook that just friended me arent real.

      Hands off. That's my fiancee.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The internet. Where the women are men and the children are FBI agents.

    3. Re: Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ****makes and L shape with fingers holds it up by forehead****

      Ahhhhh see guys; she's saying how much she loves me. ;)

    4. Re: Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dodgeball :)

  7. Tweedly dee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they likely have been created recently, have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages.

    That sounds like my account.

  8. "The jig is up!" yelled Kris Jenner by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    "Take the secret plane to the island. It's already loaded with the gold. MOVE!!"

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    posting some examples?

  10. Took you long enough by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I'll bet you thought Russia was doing this with real accounts?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  11. I know I want a twitter bot army by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    It's a vanity thing, but I want to "command" a bunch of fake followers to drive fake news and generally screw with certain people. I'm not willing to pay much for the privilege but it would be fun for about 2 days and then I go back not giving a F about twitter. So, yeah, it's best to just rent.

  12. 350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by SeaFox · · Score: 2

    I can't imagine how they make that work with so few of the actual devices in use.

    1. Re:350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      emulation on a VM farm.

    2. Re:350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      Chances are that they aren't even using one Windows Phone - just spoofing the browser ident string from a cluster of virtual servers running PHP scripts. But I guarantee that somewhere, someone is using these numbers to boost Windows Phone's reported popularity to existing/potential investors and app developers.

    3. Re:350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by beckett · · Score: 1

      In other news, Installed smartphone marketshare of Windows Phone software dropped to "Steve Balmer Only"

  13. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually pretty good and might contain the answer to your question, without the vitriol of a post election emotional American commenter.

    1. Re:RTFA by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      ...emotional American commenter.

      hey, we're good at making highly charged comments like we're an authority of the subject matter even though we ain't got a clue what it is.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  14. So.... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    So if they found 350,000 fake accounts, why doesn't Twitter remove or deactivate them? Why in the world would you want to keep them?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:So.... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Twitter is a social app.
      The value of the platform is directly tied to how many users they supposedly have for advertising/data-mining purposes.

    2. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason Rolex doesn't remove all the fake Rolex watches?

      A fake Rolex is one that looks like a Rolex on the outside, but "made in China" on the inside. Thus a fake Twitter account must be one that looks like a Twitter account on the outside, but says "Facebook" on the inside.

  15. Remember the botnet attacks on Ted Cruz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was noted in the election.
    https://storify.com/LegInsurrection/exposing-donald-trump-s-twitter-botnet

    The list of bots
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AV12NO9q4dS4lJTRnV3JcD71uCBT_gCnUm8W8RnsIQw/edit#gid=29919938

    A mass of accounts with zero followers, all tweeting the same things, 465 Twitter users collectively urged people to complain to the FCC about Cruz robocalls, in total 1.78 million tweets attacking Ted Cruz.

    Trump has Ruskie programmers helping out. They are likely the same group helping now to try to secure him as a fake 'popular' president.

  16. Twitter Quitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised anyone still have a Twitter account.

  17. Re: Just like FAKE NAME fucks here... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck, you are annoying. You rant about people using anonymous handles and you were born as "apk"? Your parents fucked you over.

    Get a life. Stop spamming this site.

  18. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Leila234, MaryXXX, and Cindy987 aren't real? I'm heart broken. /sarc.

  19. There goes breitbart's numbers by mnemotronic · · Score: 2

    Down to the 71 actual humans who follow it.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  20. I'd create a twitter bot to do that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, seriously. I won't touch twitter with a ten foot pole.

  21. Re: Oh & by the way, cowardly whimp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right on APK!!!

    Good of you to note RM and BH for standing up. You do it too.

  22. Mmmmh by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "messages being posted only from Windows phones"

    Both of them?

  23. Pretty sure I have one of those by shanen · · Score: 1

    Well, at least Twitter keeps sending me validation requests for one or more fake Twitter accounts that I never created and have no interest in validating. The header of the email indicates that most of them are coming from a slightly mangled form of my email address that is used by spammers. I don't know what the scam is, but it's been going on for many months, perhaps even a couple of years now, so they must be making money somehow.

    Tried to report it to Twitter and the google a couple of times, especially in the early months. They obviously aren't interested and did nothing to stop it. At first I was mostly concerned about some kind of identity theft. I'm still considering that as a possibility for the suckers that do validate the fake accounts, but so far I haven't detected any direct impact on me.

    The fake Amazon account in my name seemed more dangerous, but at least Amazon finally did nuke that one (after 18 months and escalation all the way to jeff@ (more than once)). The fake Amazon account was actually validated to one of my email addresses, apparently via a bug in their Android app. (Another possibility in the Amazon case is that it was a scam like Wells Fargo case, with employees creating fake accounts to boost their performance ratings.) Suffice it to say that Amazon was not very forthcoming with details about what was going on or how they finally stopped it.

    Anyway, in my first scan of these comments I couldn't find any similar reports. I thought it was a wholesale thing, but the lack of other reports makes me worry about spear-phishing... (I wouldn't be the real target, but it is possible that I could be an intermediate target.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  24. Memberberries! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    messages being posted only from Windows phones; exclusively including quotes from Star Wars novels.

    Remember Obi Wan Kenobi? Remember the Wookies? Remember the Windows phones? Remember the communists outside of White House? Remember the freedom of speech? Remember the Death Star? Oh, yeah I remember.

  25. Fake accounts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a fake account?

    An account usually consists of a user id in a database somewhere, a username and a password. How can that be fake, unless by fake they mean "doesn't actually exist"?

    As far as I know, unlike Facebook and Google, Twitter doesn't have a real name policy. Heck, there are comic characters with Twitter accounts, e.g. https://twitter.com/martenreed

    So, "fake account" can't be an intentional (aka. propaganda) misspelling of "not a real person", or "person not using his legal name", because there is clearly nothing wrong with either of those.

    Is it like a fake Rolex? As in it looks like a twitter account, but if you look closer at it you realize that it's actually a Facebook account?

  26. Isn't that just called Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  27. maths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't find/didn't see any figures about how many Twitter accounts there are meant to be,nor how many of them are "active",I.e viewed at least once a month,350.000 fakes seem very small or is this just a certain sub-set of fake accounts ?
    Have tried using Twitter twice over the years,sorry,but I just don't get the point of the "service" it's a very narrow slice of people that seem to use it on a regular basis..
    Can't it just be re- named,naff,or popularity club ?
    I wouldn't believe anything I found on Twitter anymore than i would something from f..book,or most "social media" sites,,as sources of "news" they leave an awful lot to to be desired..
    I would suspect that using my viewed once a month measure,at least 50% of Twitter is fake/dead accounts..

  28. My God by ruir · · Score: 1

    ". Some bots are easy to spot as they likely have been created recently, have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages."

    I am a bot, and I did not even know, the horror...

  29. Re: Big courage from UNIDENTIFIABLE ac punk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call them "plastic people"
    "Non-folk",who cannot think at all therefore cannot think for themselves..
    "Horrible hollows",nothing inside,so shallow their entire lives/character/spirit shows in a one molecule thick layer on the outside..
    but it's just cross contaminants from one "non-folk" to another,nothing of worth or value..

  30. Screwed Again by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Just another example of someone making something good and another person comes in and wrecks it.

    1. Re:Screwed Again by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Some things we'll never have a shortage of are: Jerks, *ssholes, people who push you around, people who enjoy making you miserable.

  31. So by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    tweets coming from places where nobody lives; messages being posted only from Windows phones; exclusively including quotes from Star Wars novels.

    So, Windows Developers...

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  32. And why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do we care about swarms of twitter bots? Follow a person, not a crowds.

    As for the people who do follow crowds, I'm sure they're happy to donate money to Kanye's failing clothing line or help the good, christian, nigerian doctor/prince/barrister/uncle who is just trying to get his money out of the country.

  33. I'm not a bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just unimaginative in my tweeting.