Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Discover Massive Networks of Fake Twitter Accounts (bbc.com)

mi writes: Turns out, there are researchers studying ways to identify bots on Twitter -- fake accounts used by individuals or groups for various purposes. They identified, what seems like a collection of 350,000 accounts, all of which share the same subtle characteristics: tweets coming from places where nobody lives; messages being posted only from Windows phones; exclusively including quotes from Star Wars novels. "Considering all the efforts already there in detecting bots, it is amazing that we can still find so many bots, much more than previous research," Dr Zhou, a senior lecturer from UCL, told the BBC. Juan Echeverria uncovered the massive networks by combing through a sample of 1% of Twitter users in order to get a better understanding of how people use the social network. He is now asking the public via a website and a Twitter account to report bots to get a better idea of how prevalent they are. Some bots are easy to spot as they likely have been created recently, have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages.

43 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Why? by magarity · · Score: 2

    have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages

    So why bother setting it up? How does one monetize a twitterbot swarm of strange names with banal content?

    1. Re:Why? by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Because sheeple see some celebrity has 50,000 followers, so they need to follow too.

    2. Re:Why? by sexconker · · Score: 2

      1/3 spammer army, 1/3 in the hands of botnet operators to be sold off for use in trolling/harassment/activism campaigns, 1/3 Twitter inflating user numbers to get that sweet, sweet money.

      Social media - 50% of the accounts are bots, but 100% of the users are fake.

    3. Re:Why? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Imagine this: You have 350000 twitter-bots at your command. For the right price you can be hired to flood Twitter with whatever message you want.
      It's a social engineering tool. People are gullible. Regardless of the 'strange usernames' or any enigmatic content they're tweeting otherwise, if the average Twitter user sees 350000 retweets of a particular message, they're going to believe it's a Real Thing, and they'll probably retweet it themselves, giving it even more momentum and credibility. Instant viral content.

    4. Re:Why? by FudRucker · · Score: 2

      I follow two accounts, one is on the topic of Linux and the other is the topic of SDR Radios, and have nobody following me and i dont have a single tweat, i am a 100% lurker

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    5. Re: Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You may not have a tweek but you certainly have a twat

    6. Re:Why? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Imagine this: You have 350000 twitter-bots at your command. For the right price you can be hired to flood Twitter with whatever message you want.

      #MAGA

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Why? by PPH · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that your name isn't Chad.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Why? by operator_error · · Score: 1

      Not to be personal mind you, but why not use RSS feeds instead? I realize Twitter made it much easier than before, but here we're on /. and all. But seriously, I wonder why more people don't use RSS to monitor twitter feeds like the %$#@! POTUS, rather than 'subscribing' and somewhat identifying themselves; ...not to mention since I started with a good example, many of the citizenry have been actively blocked by the twitter-account-holder directly?

    9. Re:Why? by operator_error · · Score: 2

      This also helps to explain things: https://www.kcrw.com/news-cult...

    10. Re:Why? by rgmoore · · Score: 2

      For the right price you can be hired to flood Twitter with whatever message you want.

      Except that's of limited utility. A twitter feed only contains tweets by (or retweeted by) people the user is following, so tweeting by a bunch of bots with no followers won't flood the feeds of anyone else. You could use something like that to get a topic trending, but most people would ignore it once they realize it's just a bunch of bots tweeting the same message.

      It's much more likely to be an army of followers for hire. There are apparently people who will pay real money to get an army of fake twitter followers to make them look more impressive. It apparently even works. People pay more attention to tweeters with more followers, so getting a bunch of fake followers can actually help you to get real ones.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    11. Re:Why? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Politicians and celebrities like their accounts to reflect their standing in the community or fans taking an interest in new projects.
      If the politicians and celebrities are boring or their projects fail, happy people can be found online to create interest and keep the numbers up.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    12. Re:Why? by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      there are a few twitter accounts i bookmarked but i have not followed them because i want to visit them at my leisure

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    13. Re:Why? by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      In all seriousness, I'd be surprised if the real number was below 80% for twitter. Most of the investors/shareholders - the ones who aren't actually involved in orchestrating the bots themselves that is - would be grabbing their torches and pitchforks if they knew.

    14. Re:Why? by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      And those 35,000 twitter-bots spam a message to all the other twitter bots, fake accounts, and the occasional IRL tardface who owns a twitter account.

      I still don't see the point.

    15. Re:Why? by radl33t · · Score: 1

      I have a 8 year old twitter account with about 3 tweets. The platform is honestly not for me. It does not facilitate rational engagement. At its very best, it is a notification service.

    16. Re: Why? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Just make sure the woman is cool with it, like the President did, and there will be no issues. Except maybe millions of women will march on their local city to complain about how sexist you are for being a heterosexual male.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. To win elections by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Twitter and Facebook played a yuge (pun) role in the last US Presidential elections. It'd be silly to ignore the effectiveness of large social networks in various kinds of propaganda. I'm sure that wasn't lost on anyone last year...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:To win elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yea, Trump got elected because of all those Star Wars quotes.

      It's kind of pathetic how everything these days gets turned into a stab at Trump. The term paranoid raving lunatics comes to mind.

    2. Re:To win elections by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1, Troll

      One can only hope that they'll eventually get over the butt hurt affront to their SJW psyche and move on with their lives. It was funny for a couple of days, but now it's just tiresome.

    3. Re:To win elections by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Obama largely elected on Twitter as well? I seem to remember that he was considered hip because he used Twitter. I find it funny that demographically the same people are complaining about Trump now. (I realize that not literally the same people are complaining, it is just shorthand...)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re:To win elections by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      Its all Obamas fault anyway. If he hadn't been so spineless he would have declared the Russian infiltration of US politics an act of war and voided the election.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  3. some are spammers by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    they post clickbait in the top trending tweats, i like to read through the top trending tweats and after a while i have learned to recognize them and i will report them, they usually use a cropped photo that links to their clickbait websites instead of just opening to show the full photo

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  4. Re:Omg by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Seriously? Next you'll be saying all the chicks with big fake tits and 1 month old profiles on facebook that just friended me arent real.

    Hands off. That's my fiancee.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. "The jig is up!" yelled Kris Jenner by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    "Take the secret plane to the island. It's already loaded with the gold. MOVE!!"

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. Took you long enough by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I'll bet you thought Russia was doing this with real accounts?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  7. Re:Omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The internet. Where the women are men and the children are FBI agents.

  8. I know I want a twitter bot army by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    It's a vanity thing, but I want to "command" a bunch of fake followers to drive fake news and generally screw with certain people. I'm not willing to pay much for the privilege but it would be fun for about 2 days and then I go back not giving a F about twitter. So, yeah, it's best to just rent.

  9. 350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by SeaFox · · Score: 2

    I can't imagine how they make that work with so few of the actual devices in use.

    1. Re:350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      emulation on a VM farm.

    2. Re:350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      Chances are that they aren't even using one Windows Phone - just spoofing the browser ident string from a cluster of virtual servers running PHP scripts. But I guarantee that somewhere, someone is using these numbers to boost Windows Phone's reported popularity to existing/potential investors and app developers.

    3. Re:350,000 accounts, only posts from Windows Phone by beckett · · Score: 1

      In other news, Installed smartphone marketshare of Windows Phone software dropped to "Steve Balmer Only"

  10. Re:The only question... by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Always at war, so its always 1984. Lots of escapist fun so a hint of Huxley. As for nonexistent writings, non-existent authors and translations, that would be the online world :)
    Fake accounts supporting average celebrities on social media is just something that adds to the fake fame.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. So.... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    So if they found 350,000 fake accounts, why doesn't Twitter remove or deactivate them? Why in the world would you want to keep them?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:So.... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Twitter is a social app.
      The value of the platform is directly tied to how many users they supposedly have for advertising/data-mining purposes.

  12. There goes breitbart's numbers by mnemotronic · · Score: 2

    Down to the 71 actual humans who follow it.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  13. Mmmmh by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "messages being posted only from Windows phones"

    Both of them?

  14. Pretty sure I have one of those by shanen · · Score: 1

    Well, at least Twitter keeps sending me validation requests for one or more fake Twitter accounts that I never created and have no interest in validating. The header of the email indicates that most of them are coming from a slightly mangled form of my email address that is used by spammers. I don't know what the scam is, but it's been going on for many months, perhaps even a couple of years now, so they must be making money somehow.

    Tried to report it to Twitter and the google a couple of times, especially in the early months. They obviously aren't interested and did nothing to stop it. At first I was mostly concerned about some kind of identity theft. I'm still considering that as a possibility for the suckers that do validate the fake accounts, but so far I haven't detected any direct impact on me.

    The fake Amazon account in my name seemed more dangerous, but at least Amazon finally did nuke that one (after 18 months and escalation all the way to jeff@ (more than once)). The fake Amazon account was actually validated to one of my email addresses, apparently via a bug in their Android app. (Another possibility in the Amazon case is that it was a scam like Wells Fargo case, with employees creating fake accounts to boost their performance ratings.) Suffice it to say that Amazon was not very forthcoming with details about what was going on or how they finally stopped it.

    Anyway, in my first scan of these comments I couldn't find any similar reports. I thought it was a wholesale thing, but the lack of other reports makes me worry about spear-phishing... (I wouldn't be the real target, but it is possible that I could be an intermediate target.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  15. My God by ruir · · Score: 1

    ". Some bots are easy to spot as they likely have been created recently, have few followers, have strange usernames and little content in the messages."

    I am a bot, and I did not even know, the horror...

  16. Screwed Again by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

    Just another example of someone making something good and another person comes in and wrecks it.

    1. Re:Screwed Again by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Some things we'll never have a shortage of are: Jerks, *ssholes, people who push you around, people who enjoy making you miserable.

  17. So by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    tweets coming from places where nobody lives; messages being posted only from Windows phones; exclusively including quotes from Star Wars novels.

    So, Windows Developers...

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  18. Re:RTFA by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    ...emotional American commenter.

    hey, we're good at making highly charged comments like we're an authority of the subject matter even though we ain't got a clue what it is.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com