Slashdot Mirror


Mac Sales Declined Nearly 10 Percent Last Year (9to5mac.com)

It's not surprising that Mac sales dropped for Apple in 2016 as they experienced their first year over year sales decline since 2001. What is interesting, however, is that as Mac sales dropped roughly 10% and personal computers overall dropped 5.7% for the year, the top four leaders in the market all saw growth as Apple was pushed to number five. From a report: Although Mac sales were up in Q4 2016 compared to Q4 2015, an analyst note today from Bloomberg's Anand Srinivasan and Wei Mok has revealed Apple has dropped to the fifth largest PC vendor, with ASUS overtaking fourth place. The top four vendors are now Lenovo, HP, Dell, and ASUS. The report adds, "Those four companies represent 65.2% of the overall market and each grew year -- over-year, while Apple ceded ground, declining 30 bps to 7.1%. The other 27.7% of the market is comprised of more than 200 vendors. In a market expected to consolidate, Samsung and Fujitsu are reported to be in discussions to sell their PC businesses to Lenovo."

44 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. Well, no shit! by painandgreed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most everybody that wants a Mac already has one. If they want a new one, well, there isn't one. No new Mac Pro in three years. Same for Mac minis and the last "upgrade" was actually a downgrade. No new iMac in two. Tim Cook said last year he was expecting for people to upgrade their Macs every three years, but the sad truth is that three years is up for many people and the Mac on sale is the one they already have or so close to it that there's no reason to upgrade unless it's dead. Add in that the newer models may be less upgradable than the ones they already have and that's less incentive to get a newer Mac. I'm still on my 2008 Mac Pro because it still works and I'm certainly not going to shell out top dollar for a three year old machine. i thought I might even go down to an iMac, but they're almost as old.

    1. Re:Well, no shit! by Moof123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +1 Stagnant hardware is a death sentence in the PC industry. Frankly I am shocked they haven't dropped more. Too much of their desktop hardware is not only stagnant, but has mobile grade stuff on the inside, making the extra Apple tax that much harder to stomach.

    2. Re:Well, no shit! by sasparillascott · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So well said. At this point other than 2 flavors of performance reduced (by form) Macbook Airs (Macbook and Macbook Pro) and the iMac (a laptop in a monitor), it appears their entire desktop line is dead and just waiting to be retired. Driving a Mac Pro as well (2012), but am coming around to the conclusion that I will probably be forced to replace it with a PC cause Apple has been choosing to abandon the PC market. JMHO....

    3. Re:Well, no shit! by irving47 · · Score: 2

      Yup.
      1. Abandon product line.
      2. ?
      3. No profit for you, idiots.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    4. Re:Well, no shit! by John+Allsup · · Score: 2

      My mini mac G4s still work (I plan to replace the hdds with hybrid sshds via an ide-sata adapter), as does an old Quicksilver G4. But my intel iMacs graphics are failing, and is basically impossible to fix without shelling out silly money. Macs used to be an investment. But they have tended to get shorter and shorter lives, and get less and less maintainable.

      --
      John_Chalisque
    5. Re:Well, no shit! by ausekilis · · Score: 2

      It's not entirely Apple's fault. Yes, they haven't really pushed anything *new* in a few years, but they aren't the only ones.

      I have a 4 year old laptop running a 4000 series i7 and I look at websites on occasion to see if there is a laptop out there that has comparable specs + a dedicated graphics card (mine is just built-in intel) and there hasn't been much from any manufacturer in the realm I'm willing to pay.Sure, I can spend $2k or more to get some portable gamestation, but that's not what I want. I like the 15.6" size, the 16GB of RAM, the i7 3.4Ghz processor, and SSD + HD combo. There just isn't anything out there in the $1k-$1.3k range thats worth buying, and there hasn't been in 4 years.

    6. Re:Well, no shit! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the only reason they haven't dropped more is the fanatical userbase who thinks Tim Cook takes golden shits.

      Sorry, this isn't the Reality Distortion Field you are looking for. It's just inertia. If you are on a particular system, moving to another one is a PITA. Yes, it is arguably less so than say, a decade ago but for professionals with complex or demanding work flows it is often a lot of busy work that doesn't get you any further than you were before.

      So if your five year old hardware is working OK - and 5 year old MacPros, MacBook Pros and most Mac Books will get the job done for MOST (not all) people. That will stop being the case eventually and people will drift off to the Dark^HOther side.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Well, no shit! by Thanatiel · · Score: 2

      ... in your opinion.

      --
      Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
    8. Re:Well, no shit! by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sadly he's not far off. And a reminder that the comparative isn't always indicative of superiority. In other words, "better" doesn't mean that it's better than good.

      What's there to choose from? Linux. Great idea, but hardly the system for the non-geek. Sad to say it, folks, but it ain't. Even after all those years. Odd as it may sound, the main reason is that there's so much to choose from. And it all already starts with the distribution. And then which GUI? And which editor? And which...

      And Windows, let's be honest, Windows is itself living off inertia. There has been exactly zero improvement since XP, and depending on whether you consider privacy an important aspect you could easily say that it's been getting worse.

      So yes, I can't really argue against him. Mac OS is probably the best, or let's rather say, the least crappy OS currently supported by its maker.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Well, no shit! by tsqr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's fact.

      Is this one of those "alternative facts" I've been hearing about?

    10. Re: Well, no shit! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      Zero improvement? How can you possibly make that statement. Just the move to 64bit is worth the upgrade, not to mention all the security hardening (yes I know it's still shit but I'm comparing 7 to XP). The rationalisation of the file structure was also long overdue and whatever you think of PowerShell it's way better than BAT files or WSH.

    11. Re:Well, no shit! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "Sure, it's great, if you want a CLI that's 10 years out of date."

      That's the sacred Unix command line you're talking about. If you think Apple fans are the world's most hopeless cultists, you haven't met a Unix fan.

    12. Re: Well, no shit! by thesupraman · · Score: 2

      Exactly! I agree with you.

      Apple has lost their way in desktops far far more than they have lost their way in laptops, where they have only moderately lost their way. They cannot even take a standard USB flash stick!

      Friend of mines 2016 MBP has filled it's screen. Crack developed right across it over a few days of sitting on a desk. Obvious manufacturing flaw.
      So you think Apple will cover it under warrantee? Not a chance. Apparently it managed to drop itself then put itself back on the desk.. Without anyone knowing. Quite impressive really (and with no external sign of damage even!)
      Ifixit gives them a 1 for repairability.. I can only assume it's not a zero because you could replace the... Oh wait... Nothing at all.

  2. Lacking a Product Refresh? by nucrash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see, they managed to renew two models of Mac last year. The MacBook and the MacBook Pro. Everything else was stagnant. There was almost no reason at all to purchase a Mac. While the MacBook update was actually superior to the previous version, overall the update was pretty bland. It's like Henry Ford took over and said, I have the perfect car, why should I change. Granted, Intel's missteps hasn't helped either. They haven't exactly put out a homerun in the processor market since the days of SandyBridge. In the realm of the Mac Mini, their desktop actually regressed from the previous version in only have a dual core processor.

    Maybe if they actually do something this year, we can get behind them and buy their products again. If not, I am certain they will continue to slide down to the level of other vendors.

    --
    Place something witty here
    1. Re:Lacking a Product Refresh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Soldering RAM and SSD to the mobo is an instant "no-go" for a workstation for me. The goofy function row display just adds cost for a feature I didn't ask for. Sure, I'm not everyone, but I can say out of the dozens of macbook wielding "startup entrepreneurs", no one has upgraded to the new generation and those that need replacements are scouring Craigslist and the like for used ones (my favorites are from 2012). I hope Apple is leading us to the future of computing, but I don't like what I'm seeing so far.

    2. Re:Lacking a Product Refresh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple used to be known for quality hardware. My 2012 MacBook Pro was quality hardware, and I could get to the parts to replace and upgrade them. It's turning into the ship of Theseus, and it keeps on chugging, doing everything I need and doing it well. It was a Pro machine for Pros, distinguished from the consumer line.

      Apple is now known for chintzy tricks like the touch bar and for hardware that can't be upgraded: all their hardware is now consumer-commodity grade, essentially disposable hardware with planned obsolescence. I don't need to shell out money for a new MacBook Pro that doesn't do anything I can't already do, that I can't upgrade, and that isn't a Pro machine.

      Until Mac returns to the ways that brought me to buy a MacBook Pro (and, wow, I love this old thing), I'm not buying a new one.

    3. Re:Lacking a Product Refresh? by theskipper · · Score: 2

      New features+specs are nice and definitely drive a majority of sales. But don't forget they are forcing obsolescence by having non-upgradeable RAM and SSD in the latest machines. And that's not just requiring signed SSD drivers so you can't pop a cheaper Micron in it, SSD is now a soldered component. For anyone who cares about upgradability, you have to go (less than or equal to) early 2015 to get a machine with both non-soldered RAM and SSD. Those folks are pretty much shut out from purchasing a new machine because they're not the types to pay for the megapriced 16GB+1TB SSD.

      So one could argue 128GB fixed SSD and 8GB RAM is one way of forcing obsolescence on the lowest prices Macbook pros (btw not in terms of SSD wear, just purely outgrowing size/memory). Of course this isn't the majority of Macbook buyers and would just be a blip in sales. But any dent in average resale value down the road hurts the overall brand.

  3. 30 bps by omnichad · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thanks summary and article for quoting "30 bps" seemingly without knowing what it means.

    Anyway, I looked it up. It is a financial term, not a bandwidth one.

    A basis point (often denoted as bp, often pronounced as "bip" or "beep") is one hundredth of a percent.

    I don't know how 30bps is easier to understand than 0.3% but there you have it.

    1. Re:30 bps by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

      Thank you.

      I couldn't understand why they didn't just say "30 baud" instead of "30 bps".

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    2. Re:30 bps by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thank you, I was wondering what that abbreviation was as well. Now I'm wondering which economist defined "basis point" to mean "a percent of a percent".

      "Basis point" is a finance term used by traders, not an economics term. Economists rarely use the term. Traders say "basis points" because they don't really understand percentages or fractions or other advanced math.

    3. Re:30 bps by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's probably due to financial markets being global, and the U.S. and most of Asia using the period as a decimal point and the comma as the thousands separator (e.g. 1,234.50), but most of Europe using the comma as a decimal point and the period as a thousands separator (1.234,50).

      A number like 12.345% is then ambiguous across the two systems. In the U.S. it would mean twelve and 345 thousandths of a percent. But in Europe it would mean twelve thousand three hundred forty five percent.

      If you just call hundredths of a percent a basis point, you avoid this problem. (A programming analogy would be assigning a unit to the smallest number you'll ever use, so that you can use ints instead of floats, thereby eliminating the risk of errors due to misplacing the decimal.)

    4. Re:30 bps by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is to remove ambiguity, but not that one.

      If you have 12% market share, and your share goes up 2%, what does that mean? Is your new share 14% or 12.24%? On the other hand, if your 12% share goes up 200 bps, your new share is 14% - no ambiguity.

  4. When to buy a Mac by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    According to the MacRumors Buyer's Guide, only the MacBook Pro is a recommended buy, and that's one of the most panned Macs to ever come out. With sales of Apple Watches, iPads & iPhones tanking, they better have a boatload of new offerings in 2017 to turn things around, or they'll really be in trouble.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:When to buy a Mac by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup. I have a late 2013 MacBook Pro and our usual upgrade cycle is 3 years. Work would buy a new one, but I'm waiting until the next generation of CPUs so that I can get one with 32GB of RAM. There hasn't been a single compelling update to the MBP line since 2013 (Haswell).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re: When to buy a Mac by Toy+G · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ram has not been upgradeable aftermarket in any MBP released after 2011. In the latest models you cannot even swap the SSD drive; that's a slap in the face, it basically forces you to buy their AppleCare insurance as soon as warranty runs out (1 or 2 years depending on country). And if you want extra power bricks, you have to buy them AND power cables separately. That's taking "nickle & dime" to a new level.

      --
      -- Let's go Viridian.
    3. Re:When to buy a Mac by link-error · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They've started to solder the memory onto the motherboard, so you can't upgrade any longer.. I 'almost' switched to make about a year ago, and this kept me from crossing over. Now I just run Mint on a nice dell business laptop.

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    4. Re:When to buy a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope, both RAM and SSD are soldered now so no upgrades at all.

    5. Re:When to buy a Mac by sandbagger · · Score: 2

      You know, you're absolutely right.

      I'm going to march right over to the Apple store and take a look at their latest full size towers.

      --
      ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    6. Re:When to buy a Mac by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Depends on whether your 2010 is still as-shipped or not. Stick a 1 TB SSD in that 2010, and the performance difference gets a lot smaller.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. Re:I don't think Apple cares by MachineShedFred · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They might not directly make much money from Mac, but they indirectly make shitloads of money from Mac, because Mac is the development environment for the iOS App Store.

    Keeping macOS a going affair is a big piece of their product portfolio, unless they do a shit ton of work to port Xcode somewhere else.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  6. self-inflicted category killer by epine · · Score: 4, Informative

    I tried to procure Mac Minis for a small office in angel-finance reboot mode—it was a blank slate for changing the mix—and Apple had neutered the quad-core mini with the expansion RAM slot so badly, we bought refurbed Windows 7 boxes instead.

    Worse machine, twice as much memory, half the price.

    One key executive who has cold feet about making the jump, and you're not going to risk a castrated revamp. So it goes.

    The New Mac mini is Quickly Turning into a Disaster

    It was soon revealed that Apple was using soldered RAM in the new Mac minis, an unfortunate development that meant that customers would no longer be able to upgrade their memory after purchase. Want the maximum 16GB of RAM for your new Mac? That'll be $300 extra at checkout ...

    Compounding the memory upgrade situation is the company's choice of CPUs. Yes, they're Haswell, but they're not as fast as their 2-plus-year-old Ivy Bridge predecessors. The old 2012 Mac mini lineup included options for both dual- and quad-core CPUs, but the new 2014 models are dual-core only, and the efficiency improvements in Haswell can't compensate for the loss of those two cores.

    I had 100% buy-in for the Apple solution, had we still been able to get the 2012 spec. Mac mini.

    My office mate had brought his own 2012-era Mini into the office and everyone loved it, which is how the option to jump ship from Microsoft entered the conversation in the first place.

    Then *bam* the anvil behind the velvet curtain when we specked out the crippled revamp.

    I can only imagine that Apple kind of wants to kill off the PC category altogether. Insufficient lock-in. Choice remains.

    1. Re:self-inflicted category killer by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I tried to procure Mac Minis for a small office in angel-finance reboot mode—it was a blank slate for changing the mix—and Apple had neutered the quad-core mini with the expansion RAM slot so badly, we bought refurbed Windows 7 boxes instead.

      Worse machine, twice as much memory, half the price.

      One key executive who has cold feet about making the jump, and you're not going to risk a castrated revamp. So it goes.

      The New Mac mini is Quickly Turning into a Disaster

      It was soon revealed that Apple was using soldered RAM in the new Mac minis, an unfortunate development that meant that customers would no longer be able to upgrade their memory after purchase. Want the maximum 16GB of RAM for your new Mac? That'll be $300 extra at checkout ...

      Compounding the memory upgrade situation is the company's choice of CPUs. Yes, they're Haswell, but they're not as fast as their 2-plus-year-old Ivy Bridge predecessors. The old 2012 Mac mini lineup included options for both dual- and quad-core CPUs, but the new 2014 models are dual-core only, and the efficiency improvements in Haswell can't compensate for the loss of those two cores.

      I had 100% buy-in for the Apple solution, had we still been able to get the 2012 spec. Mac mini.

      My office mate had brought his own 2012-era Mini into the office and everyone loved it, which is how the option to jump ship from Microsoft entered the conversation in the first place.

      Then *bam* the anvil behind the velvet curtain when we specked out the crippled revamp.

      I can only imagine that Apple kind of wants to kill off the PC category altogether. Insufficient lock-in. Choice remains.

      I honestly think that Apple was running into significant cooling issues with the Quad-Core mini. Now that there are quad-core Skylake's out that are MUCH lower-power, perhaps this year's (2017) minis will be quad again...

  7. How Lee Iococca killed the US Auto industry. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Cars used to be expensive, and people wanted their cars to last. But once everyone who wanted a car had one, the car sales would grow only at the rate of population. Firestone Ford and Standard oil engaged in nearly illegal actions, buying bus lines and tram lines and closing them down etc. But still the end was inevitable. That is when Lee Iococca had the epiphany. "If we build crappy cars that died every five years, they will be forced to buy new cars!".

    He called it the "Planned Obsolescence". He argued, "If the planned life of a car is five years, it is a waste to design its components to last 10 years". So he deliberately got the cars built using less durable components. But statistics is a bitch. If the car had 100 components each with a design life of five years and they had 95% confidence level, you are likely to have at least 5 failures before 5 years. (Roughly speaking, I did not ace my stats class either).

    But US was on a roll so and all the car makers got on the bandwagon. But rest of the world wanted reliable and durable cars. Where cars were considered too valuable to be scrapped in three/five years, the market demanded better cars. The Japaneses served those markets using small econoboxes, something no American would even look at.

    Then came the oil shock! Americans tried the tiny Japanese econoboxes, for fuel economy. But fell in love with their durability. The difference between the reliability of Japanese and American cars were stark, plainly visible, no amount of marketing gimmicks could fix that. GM went from 60% of the world auto market in 1959 to less than 30% of just US auto market in 1990.

    So the lesson Apple might learn would be, "We should not be building our computers that last this long."

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  8. That is so weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sean Spicer just said that Apple had "sold more Macs last year than ever before".

  9. Re:I don't think Apple cares by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    If the two major pillars of the prison camp, er . . . um, I meant walled garden are the Mac and the iPhone, then letting either pillar fail gives people significantly less reason to stay in the walled garden.

    If you get a non-Mac PC / laptop, then suddenly you are a bit more interested in your phone being able to interoperate in a world that isn't 100% apple.

    Something that is sub par within the walled garden forces people to venture outside the walled garden. Then they see it from the outside. On the inside the walls may be pretty. But from the outside, they see the barbed wire, machine gun emplacements, etc. They may also realize a whole world of other brands of products not made by Apple. Smart watches. TVs set top boxes. Home automation.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  10. Apple's Missteps by FellowConspirator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple has made a lot of missteps in the past few years, ostensibly in the name of innovation, without really considering how their products are used and the role bits and pieces of their product line reinforce the brand. Particularly Mac fans have felt it, and now it's hitting home.

    Regressions in software, elimination of Apple tools that add value to their platform, allowing hardware to go stale yet designing them to not be modifiable, going style over ergonomics, etc. Jobs had a knack for ignoring the user but delivering something he could make the user feel that they wanted. The current Apple doesn't have that. When they drop the ball on something, they take a ding.

    They are also taking far too many cues from Google that are producing terrible (worse, anyway) UIs and UXs. Their products are slowing becoming more awkward and less consistent and coherent. These are minor things, but they add up.

  11. That's what happens when you're offering 1 product by sandbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has simplified their product parts bin so that everything is using laptop parts designed for their thinness at all costs product goals. This means even their desktop units are constrained by the same thermal throttling that kicks when put under load.

    It's compounded by them taking forever to update their product line, some of which is outside their control. However, the RAM constraints put on them by their CPU constraints are a self-inflicted wound when it comes to their desktop products. In this sense, they're only offering one product -- old laptop parts -- just in different cases, including the Mini and the iMac.

    I understand that simplifying their parts bin does make some things easier but please stop trying to sell me an economy car when I want an 18-Wheeler.

    Where is my Mac Pro Tower with dual ethernet and room for six internal volumes? The Mac Pro was the Empire Strikes Back of cases. Will we ever see its like again? If people like us have noticed the lack of a full ecosystem of hardware from Apple, what do you expect us to recommend to our businesses, family and friends?

    Oh, and as an aside, they really, really need to be taken to task on their irreparable computers. Want to extend the device's lifecycle by swapping the HD, adding ram or upgrading the internals? Screw you buy a new machine and throw out the old one! Apple should be given a medal by the landfill owner's association.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  12. Apple doesn't care by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate to say it, but Tim Cook is just destroying Apple. At the Apple store in our mall now, they have just two tables devoted to MacBooks. On the walls, they have a Mac Mini, a tower, and a couple of iMacs. It's obvious that it's simply not something they're pushing hard. The extra tables that had MacBooks on them last year now have phones and tablets. And Apple TVs - they're pushing those hard. They are showing less than half the Macs that they were showing a year ago. To put it into perspective, the Best Buy has nearly as many MacBooks on display as the Apple store.

    Now, you could say they're responding to lowered demand, but they really need to get their shit together. The proper response is to figure out why the demand is lower (hint: no significant upgrades since Jobs died 5 years ago) and fix it. It's really not that difficult for them to maintain their market position, it's amazing that they could screw it up this badly.

    1. Re:Apple doesn't care by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      The market is changing though, and with the phone and tablet, Apple capitalizes on that change.

      Don't agree with the strategy, but it makes business sense.

      I don't buy it. iPhone sales aren't up, and I'm pretty sure tablet sales plateaued a few years ago. The Apple Watch was pretty much DOA, and they give it a table in the store. They really just need to get their shit together, upgrade the macs and macbooks, and start marketing them again. Again, I have no idea how they can botch this so badly. I don't expect them to come out with another iPhone-type success, but it shouldn't be that difficult to maintain standard upgrade paths for the few products that they have.

  13. Re:I bought my last Apple product last year. by avandesande · · Score: 2

    I quit shaving a few months ago, that's how I joined the Furface family.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  14. Re:Timmy's Final Solution Rolls On by Hawks · · Score: 2

    Timmy's hatred for computers and Steve Jobs are legendary. The decline of the Mac lines which have been preceded by the reductions in hardware capability and operating system capability are the plan to kill-off the Mac, iPod and iTunes. Back in the day, iPod and iTunes saved the Mac after their introduction.

    Timmy's and Apple's next master-plan piece of innovation will be a the "Apple Tickle" a lesbian masturbation device tethered by blue-tooth and wifi to allow two or more lesbians to masturbate (the device is inserted into the vagina and controlled by iPhone) while playing masturbation games, in their home, on a bus, in a shopping mall or in their cars as such.

    Apple with just "Partner" with Lovense like they did with LG. Slap an Apple logo on one end and everybody is happy.

    --
    in anima Apparatus
  15. I don't know why... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    I can't understand why people keep saying Mac sales are dead or dying.

    Just in the last week, I bought a 64GB, 3GHz, triple one-terabyte drive, 12/24 core Mac Pro with a graphics card that will more than do what I need. Beautiful tall thing, truly awesome case design, lots of ports, three open card slots, expandable, physically secure, latest MacOS installed.

    For ~$1500.00, with free shipping and 30 days return privileges to make sure it arrives safely and works as specified.

    I bought it at what has become my absolute favorite Mac store, EBay.

    Looks to me like Mac sales are doing awesome.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  16. Market prices for used Mac Pros by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2

    Have you seen the market prices for used Mac Pros? The last of the "cheese grater" Mac Pros - especially the 12 core models - are trading for serious bucks, almost their original sale price. When Apple released the inferior "new" Mac Pro, the demand for the older systems went up.

    Man am I glad I abandoned the Windows world and bought my 12-core Mac Pro back in 2012.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10