Slashdot Mirror


Smart Baby-Trackers Mostly Unnecessary, Say US Doctors (bbc.com)

A group of pediatricians has called for smart health-trackers, designed to monitor babies while they sleep, to be regulated by the same US body that oversees other medical equipment. An anonymous reader shares a BBC report: The monitors, which often take the form of sensors fitted to clothing or nappies, measure signs such as heart rate and breathing during sleep. The data is shared with a phone app. The doctors spoke out after seeing babies being brought to A&E after smart-monitor false alarms. The team from the Children's Hospital in Philadelphia said the devices should be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). One brand they mentioned was Owlet, which sells a $250 monitor that tracks sleeping babies' heart rates and oxygen levels via a sensor concealed inside his or her sock. It says on its website that it has already submitted a medical version to the FDA for approval. "For most healthy babies there is not a role for home monitoring at all," said neonatologist Dr Elizabeth Foglia, one of the authors of the opinion piece published by the American Medical Association journal Jamanet.

6 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. buy it or you're a bad parent by known_coward_69 · · Score: 3, Funny

    and you kid will die without you knowing and you will feel guilty

    run out and buy it now before your baby dies

    1. Re:buy it or you're a bad parent by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bought one for my kid. He just said, "F* you, dad" and went back to wrenching on his Harley.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:buy it or you're a bad parent by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I'm sorry for what happened to your niece, you're not winning this argument any better than known_coward_69. Can either of your provide statistics for how high the risk is of SIDS? The parent poster is correct in there is a certain level of playing to fear and baiting helicopter parents to make sales here.

    3. Re:buy it or you're a bad parent by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, there are cases to be made for all of these sorts of monitors. For example, I see no problem with parents of mentally challenged children who give the kid a GPS to wear so that they can track the kid if he/she happens to wander off.

      The grouse I have is the idea that each and every one of us should be using these at all times with our children--just in case. Some of this comes from companies that take a few dollars worth of parts, put something together for a few hundred dollars, with little-to-no quality testing against a false positive. They then sell it to some parent who attaches it to their kid and then ends up rushing their kid to the ER once a month because the monitor said that they have an irregular heartbeat when it's actually just the monitor that is screwed up.

  2. Re:Or they just straight up dont work by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you try turning the baby off and then on again?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  3. Re:Technophilia run amok by AdamThor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Look. These "Smart Babies" are dangerous. Regular babies will cry all night and keep their parents up, but when you combine this lack of diurnal schedule with the cunning intelligence of "Smart Babies" you'll have infants crawling out of bed, hatching plots in the middle of the night! Looking for the cookie jar, wandering outside, making off with the silver! Stealing the breath of the family cat!

    Smart babies must be monitored! Won't somebody think of the babies?!

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."