Kickstarter Suspends Crowdfunding Campaign For Electronics 3D Printer (3dprintingindustry.com)
Kickstarter has suspended a crowdfunding campaign that promised its backers "a high-end multi-material 3D liquid jet printer" that could print circuit boards. Slashdot reader PrintBetter writes: With just three days to go, backers were pulling out of Next Dynamics' NexD1 Kickstarter amidst fears the creator exaggerated progress on their prototype and tried to pass off prints purchased from Shapeways as their own... [T]he Berlin company's campaign was a darling of Kickstarter, carrying their "Projects We Love" endorsement and receiving praise from publications like TechCrunch, 3DPrint.com and Make magazine for its purported ability to mix up to six plastic and conductive resins in a single print.
But as pledges grew to over half a million euros, backers started to sense things didn't add up. Kevin Holmes commented "Wow, I'm stunned -- I cancelled my pledge already ... Did they really buy parts from Shapeways and pass them off as their own?" while Anthony Webb remarked "I've backed over 100 projects on Kickstarter ... but this one takes the cake for a complete scam." The company was a no-show at events it scheduled this week, including a demonstration Monday and a live stream Tuesday.
But as pledges grew to over half a million euros, backers started to sense things didn't add up. Kevin Holmes commented "Wow, I'm stunned -- I cancelled my pledge already ... Did they really buy parts from Shapeways and pass them off as their own?" while Anthony Webb remarked "I've backed over 100 projects on Kickstarter ... but this one takes the cake for a complete scam." The company was a no-show at events it scheduled this week, including a demonstration Monday and a live stream Tuesday.
How is this any different than 90% of the kickstarters? Did they exaggerate just a bit too much?
conductor electronics, or even electronic circuit boards, but aren't all the conventional production methods essentially printing albeit with a mask (like a printed t-shirt), ot even mentioning epitaxy here. Usually there's an etching step in there too, but so too with "3d printing" and acetone vapor.
Here's 2 PDF mirrors of the pastebin:
https://www.docdroid.net/2MEWa...
https://www.scribd.com/documen...
And an Archive.is mirror:
http://archive.is/q9E44
Just curious where you got that number. From Kickstarter? Does Kickstarter say that Kickstarter is often good?
Of course on Slashdot, 83% of statistics come directly from the poster's imagination*, so that's a possibility too.
* Including this one
Let's see - passing off a 3D print made by Shapeways (not the device in question).
Doing things that are physically impossible (printing overhangs without support).
Sounds like a good start to me.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
I would never invest into a company that does not even have an Impressum containing a postal address at their web page - and I could not find one at http://next-dynamics.com/
At least the "Handelsregister" knows their postal address - Prenzlauer Allee 242, 10405 Berlin - so I guess those who still consider investing into them might want to take a look at what they invest into, there, first.
Thanks for that information, and the citation.
Sorry if I was a bit skeptical.
You can print limited overhangs without support on an FDM printer. Despite having a dual head printer (so I can print soluble supports), I've successfully got well over 45 degrees, probably nearly 60 on small parts. But you have to use a relatively thick bead and a really really really slow speed to get acceptable results.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
Poor communication ?
They had one of the founders posing as a happy backer who was so impressed he'd backed them again for a second machine !
And they tried avoiding the points about the Shapeways saga, claiming they can't release the files due to copyright, totally ignoring the fact that the creator of one of those designs took part in the discussion pointing out that she'd never given them to anyone.
Then they tried to wash over the whole "sandstone finish" by claiming it's a result of the support material used, but never explained why the whole print had that finish (you don't print supports over the top do you?).
They've been caught out, but just don't have the balls to admit whatever the truth is and were hoping it would just blow over if they kept quiet.
...Suckers!
What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.