Slashdot Mirror


LibreOffice 5.3 Released, Touted As 'One of the Most Feature-Rich Releases' Ever (omgubuntu.co.uk)

An anonymous reader shares a report: A new month, and a brand new version of open-source office suite LibreOffice is now available to download. And what a release it is. LibreOffice 5.3 introduces a number of key new features and continues work on improving the look and feel of the app across all major platforms. The Document Foundation describes LibreOffice 5.3 as "one of the most feature-rich releases in the history of the application." One of the headline features is called MUFFIN interface, a new toolbar design similar to the Microsoft Office Ribbon UI.

39 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Not Another Office Clone! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't like using Word for large documents.

    I invested time and learned to use Latex. It has addressed my problems.

    Using an alternative office clone that doesn't also solve the problems of wysiwyg editors is not appealing.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Not Another Office Clone! by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool story Grandbro.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Not Another Office Clone! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cool story Grandbro.

      Get off my lawn!

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Not Another Office Clone! by chipschap · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think there is an OpenOffice extension that outputs latex. :-)

      There is, and I've used it a number of times, once to convert someone's 700+ page manuscript so I could produce a proper book with LaTeX. It works reasonably well, actually, and is so much better than trying to typeset with a tool (like a word processor) not really suited to producing press-ready output.

  2. Just like MS Word ... by perpenso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Touted As 'One of the Most Feature-Rich Releases' Ever

    That is a very Microsoft like statement, "goodness" defined by feature count, and probably not a good path to go down.

    1. Re:Just like MS Word ... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      That is a very Microsoft like statement, "goodness" defined by feature count, and probably not a good path to go down.

      Agreed. Take word processors, for example. The features available in standard word processor software 30 years ago are still probably adequate for 97% of tasks today. If companies like Microsoft had just focused on improving those core features, that would have been great. But instead, you get these bloated hybrids that don't work well for text-editing and basic word processing (because they're overfull of unnecessary crap, some of which screws up basic editing). And they're not good for proper "desktop publishing" either, because the features aren't organized in a way that enables and encourages the kind of flexibility that professional typesetters and layout designers want (since it enables efficient management of layout and formatting).

      Legitimate question: Maybe this thread would be a good place for people to recommend "lighter" but stable open-source alternatives to LibreOffice, preferably stuff available cross-platform. For example, I've tried out AbiWord in the past, though last time I used it (probably 6-7 years ago), it still seemed somewhat buggy. I also remember using Gnumeric as a spreadsheet several years ago, but is it still a stable and lighter option?

      Nothing against the LibreOffice folks, who are doing a reasonable job to try to "keep up with the Joneses" in terms of having features for people who want to move from MS Office. But what are the lighter and GOOD alternatives out there?

    2. Re:Just like MS Word ... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      The problem with your thesis is that your 97% isn't *my* 97%.

      No, I'm talking about 97% of general office tasks, not MY tasks. MS Word is crap for many of the tasks **I** want to do.

      Most people in offices use MS Word to do pretty basic stuff on an everyday basis -- crafting memos, simple short documents, etc. Outside of offices, the primary uses are probably people like students, who need to write short papers and such. All of these things could have been done with the features of MS Word decades ago.

      For the majority of more complex common office tasks (e.g., making nicer brochures, newsletters, etc.), they'd be much better off using dedicated publishing or layout software.

  3. Feature-rich by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In my experience, there's a direct correlation between "feature rich" and "buggy" for any new release.

    In other words, I'll presume it to be the most buggy release ever, until I hear otherwise.

  4. finally, Ribbon in LibreOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been holding off switching away from Office because I use the Ribbon constantly and navigating through the maze of pulldown menus in other office suites seems like transporting back to the 90's and using punch cards. I'll dl this version and give it a shot.

    1. Re:finally, Ribbon in LibreOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's optional. Did you really read the article?

  5. A ribbon clone? by rnturn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was there serious demand for this? I suspect one of the features that many -- if not most -- users of LibreOffice enjoyed was that it didn't have the damned ribbon.

    I do more writing using Emacs/LaTeX than I do with any word processor but when I do need to create a Word-compatible document I do resort to Writer (and save as ".doc"). Thanks guys for bringing the Office ribbon hassles to Writer. I'm sure everyone's tickled pink to now be able to experience Word's ribbon headaches on Linux.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:A ribbon clone? by NominalLoss · · Score: 2

      Not a fan of ribbons myself but the LibreOffice ribbon is completely optional and can be turned off. Soooo, no real issue there. Also, RTFA. ;)

    2. Re:A ribbon clone? by ISoldat53 · · Score: 2

      Maybe adding this feature will attract more people to move away from MS Word. If the UI works the same it will take lees re-training to move.

    3. Re:A ribbon clone? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Was there serious demand for this? I suspect one of the features that many -- if not most -- users of LibreOffice enjoyed was that it didn't have the damned ribbon.

      Yes, I rarely pay much attention to this, but on the few occasions I've checked in with LibreOffice's forums, I've definitely seen people complain about the lack of a ribbon OPTION. Like it or not, MS Office has had that interface for about a decade now, and many younger users have never used anything else.

      [Personally, I dislike the ribbon and have never gotten used to it. The only reason I am able to use MS Office at work in a reasonable fashion is because I have a Mac that still has actual menus. But I also know a lot of people who LIKE the ribbon, or at least grew to like it over the years.]

      Thanks guys for bringing the Office ribbon hassles to Writer. I'm sure everyone's tickled pink to now be able to experience Word's ribbon headaches on Linux.

      It's an OPTION. Apparently one of FOUR possible ways to organize your UI. If you don't want it, don't use it.

      But if LibreOffice actually still wants to sell itself as a competitor to MS Office, it needs to present a UI that isn't a shock to new users... many of whom have been using a "ribbon" in MS Office for years.

      You're correct that there was a big upsurge in use of LibreOffice (back then, OpenOffice) with the introduction of the ribbon interface. The issue is that users didn't want to learn a new interface, so OpenOffice was a good alternative. Now LibreOffice has to adapt to a new public, whose default experience is WITH the ribbon.

  6. Re:Multicore for spreadsheets..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you need multi-core threading to evaluate your spread sheets you are doing it wrong. Cell errors in spread sheets of that size can be pretty much impossible to find. At that size the process described by the calculations in the spread sheet is too big to be checked/audited. There are better ways to do things that are less subject to errors than multiple page thousand line spread sheets.

  7. Re:He's got a point. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    Editing Latex on a mac in bbedit is pretty snappy.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  8. Re:Multicore for spreadsheets..? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could tell you a story that would make you weep, but in the interest of brevity let's just say that sometimes you are Igor and you just do what Dr. Frankenstein says.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  9. Not really... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...One of the headline features is called MUFFIN interface, a new toolbar design similar to the Microsoft Office Ribbon UI....

    From TFA:

    ...We’ve told you about the MUFFIN interface project — MUFFIN stands for My User Friendly & Flexible Interface — a fair bit over the past few months, but if you haven’t heard of it it’s a new UI initiative that introduces 4 different layouts for LibreOffice applications, including a Microsoft Ribbon-esque tabbed UI and a slim, simplified, single panel toolbar....

    .
    It appears that the new interface will allow the user to use the ribbon-esque interface, a feature for the one or two people who actually like that UI. Muffin also provides other interfaces besides the weird ribbon-esque one, if you prefer a more intuitive UI.

  10. Re:He's got a point. by tibit · · Score: 2

    Huh? I use the latest LibreOffice regularly on a late 2008 MacBook Pro with a 128GB Crucial SSD, on El Capitan. Works great, and that's a Core 2 Duo CPU with 8GB of DDR3 RAM. It'd be considered obsolete by pretty much anyone these days - yet it performs admirably.

    OS X versions past 10.7 suck donkey balls on mechanical hard drives for some reason. The CPU on your Mac Mini has nothing much to do with its sluggishness. Replace the drive with an SSD and you'll fell like you've got a completely different, new machine. Just do it, you'll thank me later.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  11. Re:Multicore for spreadsheets..? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One disadvantage Calc has had compared to Excel, is it didn't support multicore when processing large spreadsheets. Has this been addressed yet..?

    They put HSA support in a while back which had the interesting side effect of meaning a puny AMD APU absolutely caned the top end i7 for spreadsheet calculation. One of those tasks where having near zero latency, memory coherent access to a huge array of floating point processors helps I guess.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  12. Re:Multicore for spreadsheets..? by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was reading a prospectus on Mathworks and was surprised that they listed Excel as the main Matlab competitor. It is simply horrifying what some people will do with Excel.

  13. Re: Multicore for spreadsheets..? by jonnyj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's easy to sneer at big spreadsheets but, if you used them yourself, you'd realise that sometimes they really are the best tool for the job. If you were to try building flexible financial forecasts across a group of companies with fast-changing assumptions and a wide range of scenarios, you'd understand what I mean.

    But there are other legitimate reasons for big spreadsheets. We have complex financial models that are coded in C# for production use but which also exist in spreadsheets for the purposes of documentation and independent model validation. Some models would take an age to refresh on a single core machine, which would seriously undermine our ability to test the production systems. How else would you suggest that we test the end to end results coming out of C#?

  14. Re:Multicore for spreadsheets..? by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when the job needs to be done and you can't get approval to get the proper tools installed, you sometimes need to use improper tools.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  15. When are they fixing the spell checker by ukoda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's great software but I do wonder when they will fix the spell checker so you can change the language from US English to the local language without the need to read help pages every time.

  16. Ribbon...?!?!?! by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well, I was happy to read this, till I saw they fscked it up with the "ribbon" interface....

    This has been the worst thing MS has ever done to a GUI interface.....and now, Libre has copied the abomination.

    If they at least will give you a choice of that or menus, that would be cool, but if ribbon only, I guess I'll stick with the older versions....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Ribbon...?!?!?! by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Difference is, this one is entirely optional. I will withhold judgment until I know for myself whether the Libreoffice incarnation rules or sucks.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re: Ribbon...?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People still complain about this? Seriously, you get used to it, and its not nearly as horrible as slashtards keeping going on about. You going to make fun of systemd next? How about throwing around an M$ insult?

    3. Re:Ribbon...?!?!?! by mmell · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, ribbon.

      Libre Office (previously: Star Office) was intended as a drop-in replacement for Microsoft Office. It was designed from the beginning to provide file-format compatibility as a free and open-source alternative to the costly (if powerful) suite of tools marketed by Microsoft.

      Making it function as identically as possible to MS-Office (ironically, even replicating bugs and security exploits) has been an intentional choice, not an accident. The presence of the ribbon in Libre Office assures that users accustomed to MS-Office will benefit from greater familiarity with the software. It'll facilitate migration from paid software to free software for users and organizations which may not want to expend the time, effort and expense to learn to use a different software package from the one they've become accustomed to.

    4. Re: Ribbon...?!?!?! by jonnyj · · Score: 4, Informative

      People still complain about this? Seriously, you get used to it, and its not nearly as horrible as slashtards keeping going on about. You going to make fun of systemd next? How about throwing around an M$ insult?

      I can understand the principles of the ribbon, but the implementation in MS Office is dreadful. The icons shown on the ribbon include dozens of things that no normal user ever uses, while things that are used every couple of minutes are hidden away in pop-up modal dialogue boxes. Most of the cell formatting functionality in Excel can't be accessed through the ribbon, for example, even though almost all users need to prettify or format their spreadsheets. Other crazy omissions include one-click icons to email the document, to export to pdf or to save the file to a new folder.

      The other problem with the ribbon is discoverability. I use Excel most days, but I regularly need to use google to help me find functionality that I use infrequently. The ribbon would be much more effective if it had a built-in search facility.

    5. Re:Ribbon...?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      MS Office can't even present MS documents without distortion. What are you talking about.

  17. Re:Multicore for spreadsheets..? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK...

    I got a call from a guy that I used to work with. He was an engineer who went for a lobotomy and came back as a manager at a company that I contract for. He knew that I was good at VBA and that I was contracting, and he had an idea to track and plan all engineering resource allocation in a half-billion dollar company through the use of Excel spreadsheets. Specifically, he envisioned a system where his master Excel sheet would burp out individual worksheets that each functional manager would fill out, then send back to him. He would then compile them all and run the analysis.

    I tried to talk him out of it - first of all, there are off the shelf resource planning apps. Nope. Well, I could make you an intranet site. Nope. Hey, you guys shell out for Sharepoint - I could put together something using that. Nope. Excel. "The managers all know how to use it." Uh-huh.

    So, I'm a contractor and I need the work... what the hell? I spend some time on it, and it was beautiful in its horrificness. Lots of delightful event-driven macros, changing things automatically as you copy or create sheets or change cell contents. It interfaced with Active Directory to get the list of engineering employees and contractors and their direct managers. I worked with HR to have the proper data fields filled in. It verified the integrity of the HR data in Active Directory. It even eventually lived on Sharepoint and did automaticy things when people opened and closed it. It churned through and made sure that everyone in the company was allocated to a project and that all the allocation numbers add up to 100%. It gave detailed analysis in pivot tables for pretty much anything that they wanted to see.

    Anyway, I created this abortion, fixed a few bugs upon initial use and then didn't think about it again. The guy got fired for obvious reasons. Maybe a year or so after that, I was again contracting for this company and one of the other managers calls me into his office. I get there and he starts asking me questions about some error message he got in "my macro". I look at what the hell he's talking about, and to my horror THEY ARE STILL USING THIS THING. I showed him how to fix it and eventually taught the SharePoint admin how the damned thing worked so that he could support it.

    So just think about that the next time you buy stock in a publicly traded company.

    Also, I hate VBA.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  18. Export to LaTeX by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    Wow! I never would have guessed. Writer2LaTeX provides Writer export filters for LaTeX and BibTeX.

    LaTeX/Export To Other Formats

    This about LibreOffice WORRIES me: The download web page doesn't display correctly in either Firefox or Internet Explorer.

  19. Re:Multicore for spreadsheets..? by gosand · · Score: 2

    I have done some pretty complex spreadsheets, and some things that I consider cool in Excel. Like being able to do a data extract from our system, plop it into a tab, change the name in a cell to that of the tab, and have all of my 10 tabs of graphs / charts / tables update by reading that cell. It uses an INDIRECT call, makes for big and ugly formulas, but cut down a manual process from 2 days worth of work to about 5 minutes.
    [yes, I know you can set up a data source and just read the data into the spreadsheet, but I was able to hand this off to some business people to do and they loved it]

    Now, having said that... :)
    Excel is over-used for things it is not well suited for. People on my test team use Excel to create test data load files in csv format for an application. It has about 100 columns, and usually no more than 50 rows or so. One of the fields needs to be unique, so it's easy in Excel to make it a number, then just drag the cell to increment it. The problem arose where we were doing a load test, and needed 1MM rows. They were trying, but failing, in Excel. It struggled with 30k rows, let alone that the process to create them was painful.

    With a quick shell script I was able to create a 1mm row csv in about 5 minutes. They were amazed. Then we needed to create another file. This time, I used the 1mm csv and vi, and made the new file in about 2 minutes. They were astounded! I have since made many more files for them, even a 5mm row file. Even in csv, it was 2.1GB in size although it compressed quite nicely. :)

    I have also started teaching them how to fish by having them download gvim for Windows and giving them pointers on how to use it. We are a Windows shop, so to many people csv=Excel, and I am trying hard to break them of that.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  20. In Other Words... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 3, Funny

    Libre Office will forever be Showtime to Microsoft's HBO.

  21. Re: Multicore for spreadsheets..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ProjectLibre is the leading open source alternative to Microsoft Project. It has been downloaded over 2,700,000 times in over 200 countries and has won InfoWorld "Best of Open Source" award. ProjectLibre is compatible with Microsoft Project 2003, 2007 and 2010 files. You can simply open them on Linux, Mac OS or Windows.

  22. Another link to OpenOffice extensions by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2
  23. Re: He's got a point. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's the answer - throw more hardware at it. Heaven forbid devs should write efficient code.

  24. Please reread. by mmell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Libre Office (previously: Star Office) was intended as a drop-in replacement for Microsoft Office.

  25. "New Interface?" by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

    "The issue is that users didn't want to learn a new interface"

    No. My issues with the ribbon are:

    • Keyboard shortcuts?
    • "Responsive" design moves the icons around as you're using the product... e.g., shrink the window to work on two docs side-by-side
    • Cryptic icons require hovering over or clicking on to figure out what they do, icons change between versions of course
    • Screen real-estate wasted displaying 80% of features I rarely or never used
    • Features given prominence which sabotage the use of styles and screw up documents
    • They removed the menus (In Windows)