Slashdot Mirror


First Screenshots of Microsoft's Windows 10 Cloud OS Leak Online (zdnet.com)

The first alleged screenshots of Microsoft's Windows 10 Cloud operating system have leaked, courtesy of Windows Blog Italia. "The screenshots seem to show a coming version of the operating system that is locked down in a way similar to the way Microsoft locked down Windows RT and, before that the Windows 8.1 with Bing version of Windows," reports ZDNet. From the report: According to Windows Blog Italia, which said they've had a chance to test the current version of Windows 10 Cloud, the product can run Windows Store apps only. The site noted that Windows Store apps built using Microsoft's "Centennial" Desktop bridge, which enables developers to move their Win32 apps to the Windows Store, work on the version of Windows 10 Cloud to which they have access. UWP apps and Windows Store apps have not been synonymous terms. But the important point here is Windows Cloud will be locked down so as to prevent users from installing apps that are not in the Windows 10 Store, which can be seen as a plus from a security and manageability standpoint, but a minus given the less-than-robust collection of UWP/Store apps available for Windows 10. Microsoft is believed to be planning to position Windows 10 Cloud, at least in part, as an alternative to Chrome OS and Chromebooks.

78 comments

  1. I'd rather have gender reassignment surgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And I'm not a millennial!

    1. Re: I'd rather have gender reassignment surgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smelly indo-chimps and millennials at Monkeyshit Corp compete to "develop" this excrement.

  2. Only apps can app apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern app appers know that only apps can app apps, and Appdows 10 Cloud is the appiest apperating app! It only apps modern appy app apps, NOT LUDDITE software like LUDDITE Windows 10!

    Apps!

  3. A version of Windows more broken than Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Buy a Chromebook, install Wine, and now you've got a more useful computer than this.

    1. Re:A version of Windows more broken than Wine by kelarius · · Score: 1

      Not having a ton of knowledge on UWP yet beyond replacing win32, does it offer any benefits from the existing platform? I mean, if they decided not to tie UWP exclusively to the Windows Store (or at the very least made sideloading easier), I could get behind a change in forma if it provided some concrete benefit, like, say. not being beholden to x86 anylonger.

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    2. Re: A version of Windows more broken than Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UWP is...bad. Right now the situation is akin to Vista drivers back in the day. Nothing is supported on UWP unless it's the most core of the core Windows core tech. CUDA doesn't work on it, which is hilariously bad for anyone doing GPU compute. C++AMP works if you fiddle around a bit, but that's aging tech. You can't render your own controls given the lack of graphics contexts. No GDI, and no WPF. It's like 30+ years of progress just got washed away.

      That's the bad side. On the good side UWP solves the installer problem by packaging apps more like Mac. This is yes++ and an issue Windows has had since before win 3.1, long in need of this fix. It makes Windows overall safer to work with by basically throwing everything away and starting from scratch.

      It's bad, but it's onto something good. Give it time.

  4. The future of the desktop is here... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    This sort of reminds me of the old Windows Starter Editions, but my cynical self makes me wonder if this is a trial balloon for upcoming releases of Windows. It benefits Microsoft a lot, because they will own the entire ecosystem similar to Apple, but even Apple wouldn't have this much of a lock on the desktop.

    1. Re:The future of the desktop is here... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who is this for? No-one bought the starter or RT editions. Consumers didn't want them, preferring to either get a proper version or just pirate the damn things. OEMs tried it, found they didn't sell and quickly ditched them.

      At best, it will be a shit version of a Chomebook or Android tablet. After Windows Mobile failed due to lack of support from third parties you would think they would have learned their lesson that Window's biggest selling point is the vast library of compatible software.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:The future of the desktop is here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Consumers didn't want them, preferring to either get a proper version or just pirate the damn things. OEMs tried it, found they didn't sell and quickly ditched them.

      Back then, they made the mistake of having alternative options available.

      At the rate Microsoft has been going with Windows 10, they will not be repeating that mistake unless you're willing to cough up the cash for an Enterprise edition.

    3. Re:The future of the desktop is here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its for education (schools), businesses (kiosk, time entry, thin clients), and possibly people who want something like a chormebook but in Windows form with support for legacy applications (just in case) since Windows 10 on ARM is pretty much a thing now.

      In my experience perfect OS for labs, and other high risk areas where malware or other software can seriously compromise the systems. With management tools from azure and SCCM it allows for easy software distribution and updates (windows store for business is a thing) while supporting legacy methods of software and desired state configuration.

      Basically its aimed at organizations and possibly small business with a toe in consumer space, if devs port their apps to the store they could take off. Additionaly with composable shell in the rumors its not to say that this would be a candidate for telephony enabled devices (LTE Etc.) Basically a mobile OS that's a full OS but with little risk of malware as apps have to come through the store... Its not bulletproof but its a step in the right direction...

    4. Re:The future of the desktop is here... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Apple may be getting more restrictive, but on OSC it currently has zero restrictions on installing your own software, building your own software, or grabbing software from random places on the web. If it has a walled garden then the walls are drawn with chalk.

    5. Re:The future of the desktop is here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Its for education (schools), businesses (kiosk, time entry, thin clients), and possibly people who want something like a chormebook but in Windows form with support for legacy applications (just in case) since Windows 10 on ARM is pretty much a thing now.

      It doesn't support 'legacy applications', except those where the developer can be bothered to package it up as a UWP so that Microsoft can grab 30% of the revenue.

      The advantage of Chromebooks in schools is that they _don't_ run local programs. This means that the student can log in on any machine and access their data (which is in the cloud). Microsoft's 'Cloud edition' may well be able to access the cloud but it is designed to sell stuff from the app store.

      You can be sure that if you want to run it as a thin client then when you buy the RDC UWP app you will also have to pay for a CAL - annually.

  5. Why is everyone copying mobile? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Both Microsoft and Linux seem to try to constantly copy bad things from mobile. In Linux's case, it's mostly user interface, while in Windows, it's both user interface and an "app store". Why do everyone hate PCs so much nowadays? My guess is a combination of people's love for dumb machines and corporate's desire for control, but I am really not sure if this is the reason.

    1. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because PCs are open, and that is something considered Very Bad in today's industry. If you don't like Steam or Apple's App Store, you can download it from another source. The goal is for makers to wall the desktop environment in, providing not just a guaranteed revenue stream like Apple's 30% toll, but also be able to control the platform and suck more of that sweet, valued telemetry data, where nobody can do anything about it.

      Plus, it would allow DRM to be added, so people with those pesky music files can't play them unless they are signed copies from the official store.

    2. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innovation. sorry. "innovation"

    3. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by bmo · · Score: 1

      The "app store" didn't originate with mobile, or even Apple.

      It originated from software repositories like Simtel, which matured into the current Linux and BSD repositories.

      These "app stores" are poor imitations of the real thing.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by StormReaver · · Score: 2

      In Linux's case, it's mostly user interface....

      Care to elaborate? I use Kubuntu, and see nothing resembling copying a Mobile interface.

    5. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They're copying Apple's definition of "brave"!

    6. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone copying mobile?

      Because that's how consumer electronics manufacturers were able to reach the next billion-plus users. The PC market became saturated, and what built on top of that is the mobile market. Those billion customers wanted something cheap, simple, and secure.

      The traditional PC is great for many reasons, but it's not for any of those reasons.

    7. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think at least some Linux Distros had people that pretended to be Steve Jobs clones. It also does not help that UX designers like all other designers are practically raised on Apple (TM) computers, sucking on Steve Jobs rotten teat from day one.

    8. Re: Why is everyone copying mobile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The desktop has been racing to the bottom for a long time now. It seems every other story is another ransomware infection. Police have fallen prey, as have hospitals and libraries. You can't fall victim to .txt.exe exploits if your OS can't run exe files.

      The web is a dangerous place and it's getting more hostile by the second. Most people want to use a computer and not be paralyzed by all this security and virus nonsense that's going on. I want to use a computer again rather than being a servant of my computer. What's wrong with that? If it means revoking every bad binary out there then I'll take it.

    9. Re:Why is everyone copying mobile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > nothing resembling copying a Mobile interface.

      Unity, Gnome 3.

  6. Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of speculation about the purpose of this implementation of Windows 10. Everyone says they have the answers and they are all inconsistent with one another. Now I will speculate. I do not think Microsoft is so stupid as to try and release this on the masses. Not even in developing countries. My take is that this is for the enterprise. Well, not precisely. If you have ever seen a Windows computer, or administrated them in a call center environment, they are locked down as fuck. That and similar happens to be a massive market. If you can remove much of the lock down administration required, that would be golden. I don't see this making sense in any other capacity. The truth is, Microsoft has been smartening up as of late, so....

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      I hate to reply to myself, but someone will bring up Chromebook competition. As a pathological nerd who has been running Linux since 1996, and is currently running a host of other operating systems (FreeBSD, OS2\Warp, etc...). My Windows 10 computer has become my daily driver since I purchased it a month or two ago. My Windows 10 computer? It is a 10 inch tablet with a paltry quad-core Cherry Trail and 4 whole gigs of ram. It is magnetically connected to a really slick keyboard\trackpad dock. It has one USB-C port and two USB-2 ports. It is also surprising fast with many applications running. This is a full fledged Windows 10 computer. Total cost? $250. That is well in line with the capability limited ChromeBooks. Admittedly, Bash on Windows goes a long way with me.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re: Speculation Speculation Speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your daily driver sounds exactly like the system I have been waiting for! What is it?

    3. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have the Redmond shills ever thought of another formula beyond "I have been a long-time Linux/BSD users, but ever since I discovered Windows, my erections are twice as a hard!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      I have been using Windows since 3.11 along aside other operating systems. Why limit yourself?

      Way off topic, I have been wondering for the longest time. What the fuck does your sig mean exactly. I mean I see the words, but...

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    5. Re: Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 0

      https://www.amazon.com/gp/prod...?

      https://www.amazon.com/gp/prod...

      Okay, so it came to 281.97 for the tablet and the dock, but it is still badass.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    6. Re: Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 0

      Replying to myself again. It is no hardcore gaming machine, but I have been very surprised how well it handles 3d graphics.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    7. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Have the Redmond shills ever thought of another formula beyond "I have been a long-time Linux/BSD users

      bigoted much? I've been running Slackware since a 486 DX50 was hot. Along with other OS's

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    8. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 0

      I mean 1994.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    9. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      For fucks sake, I was dialing into all kinds of crazy shit on a 286 since before you were Bourne.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    10. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Still waiting to hear about the lamest sig on Slashdot.

      If I keep posting, it's because I get paid $1 every time I mention Carl's Junior : p

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    11. Re: Speculation Speculation Speculation by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Ler me answer your suggestion that Windows 10 Cloud is for the Enterprise. Is there Office Apps? To my knowledge, no. Is there a Visual Studio App? No. Is there VPN Apps? No. So for the Enterprise, your user can't develop, can't run full Office, and can't remotely log into the corporate network. Who does that leave? Only the Receptionist and Administrative Assistants.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    12. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The first computer I used was an Apple II around 1980, and I got my first computer around 1981 (a real shitty little Radio Shack home computer called the MC-10 with a whopping 4k on board). I've been programming casually and professionally since before the 80286 processor was even released.

      As to my sig, it's just a sig

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:Speculation Speculation Speculation by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You're trying to hard to prove your street cred.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Not leaked, released. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows Blog Italia is backed by Microsoft. The images were not leaked, they were released. Had it been a leak, the entire domain would now be offline.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  8. Brings up some of Tim Sweeny's fears by HalAtWork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Namely the inability to do business without going through MS. Even if Steam can be distributed through Windows Store, can it still perform transactions without giving any money to MS, implement its own DRM scheme, and load 3rd party executables (i.e. the games downloaded)?

    In addition, though Win32 apps can be distributed through the Windows Store, this does nothing for the many apps that are no longer in active development, including older versions of applications preferred by some users. Any apps that go against Windows Store policies won't be available, which includes many useful utilities, emulators... and I guess doing software development is out of the question here as well.

  9. Why is anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is like every other corporation on the planet. It wants slaves, not customers.

  10. Microsoft: Not a software company, an EVIL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Who is this for?"

    It's for people who don't know enough about computers to know they are being abused.

    It's more of Microsoft being EVIL. My opinion, shared by many others.

    1. Re: Microsoft: Not a software company, an EVIL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft isn't evil, or isn't as evil as many. Heck, all companies are evil these days if you count harvesting e-mail addresses. Give Starbucks time and they'll start collecting fingerprints.

      What's evil here is that it's not like yesterday. Those days are gone now and you should forget them. Tech today is a sorry scene but we can still get something done if we're willing to work around the bugs.

  11. Do. Not. Want. by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    No fucking thanks. Do I even need to explain why?

  12. I love how M$ played [W][O][R][D][G][A][M][E][S] by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    by saying "Windows 8.1....With BING!!!!!111!!!!11ONE" instead of "Crippled piece of shit edition"

  13. What's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like Windows 10. So Windows 10 Cloud Edition, looks like Windows 10 but gripes when you try to install a normal Windows program. There isn't anything really special here. I guess people would be curious what the desktop would look like. The fact that it looks like normal Windows 10 might be a bonus? This looks like they took Windows RT and changed RT to Cloud to sell it because everything with Cloud in the name sells.

  14. Stupidest company in the whole world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Windows 7 was great. WTF happened ?

    1. Re: Stupidest company in the whole world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple envy and captitalism.

  15. 32bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as far as i know windows still uses a multi lib so to speak.

  16. Look another leak of Windows photos by ruir · · Score: 1
  17. That's hilarious by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    The very first screenshot is an error message about app compatibility. I don't know what I expected but somehow that sort of feels like what I would have expected.

    1. Re:That's hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post about error messages is not compatible with this edition of Slashdot.

  18. Windows RT, Part Deux. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Apparently, Microsoft wants to double down on failure.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Windows RT, Part Deux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they've avoided the critical failure of Windows RT - it's not the strange, "two U/I" of full screen metro and non-metro ARM apps.

      It *is* App Store only.

      (I just kinda hope they don't make an exception for Microsoft Office. THAT should be App-Store via Desktop Bridge as well!)

      I wonder if this will be the a free (as in beer) version of Microsoft Windows 10.

  19. Puzzling by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    I honestly wonder who they expect to buy/use this.

    1. Re:Puzzling by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      A cloud based OS? You know, sometimes I think my personal data is just TOO LOCAL.

    2. Re:Puzzling by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I honestly wonder who they expect to buy/use this.

      No one will. Which is why, thanks to the existing Windows 10 and rolling release/automatic updates they wont have to convince your to get it. They will just take your perfectly functional computer you have now and slowly get there in a year or two. Like a frog in a pot...

  20. Re:I love how M$ played [W][O][R][D][G][A][M][E][S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0.0.0.0 www.google.com
    0.0.0.0 google.com
    0.0.0.0 bing.com
    0.0.0.0 www.bing.com

    sucks. no more search engine to play with

  21. Locked down platform. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    The platform and the OS will be so securely locked down, all the worms and viruses must be signed by a Microsoft approved malware certificate authority.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  22. As long as it's free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll probably do very well.

  23. Hardly anyone will buy this. It will fail. Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You heard it here first.

    No, that's a lie, you heard it every with Win Starter, and Win RT, and from every pundit. The Windows store has not gained ground, and forcing people to use it won't force app developers to write for it.

  24. Dangerous to leave a Chromebook in others' reach by tepples · · Score: 2

    I agree, but only to the extent that you can keep others' paws off your Chromebook.

    I was under the impression that installing Wine required putting the Chromebook in developer mode, and enabling developer mode caused the Chromebook's firmware to display an "OS verification is off" interstitial for 30 seconds every time the Chromebook is turned on. You can skip the interstitial by pressing Ctrl+D, but someone else who turns on your Chromebook doesn't know this, and the interstitial directs the user to press Space and then Enter to perform a factory reset, which wipes all data from the Chromebook. This causes the user to lose all data that hasn't been backed up yet as well as the use of Wine until the user can return home to reinstall it.

  25. Re:I love how M$ played [W][O][R][D][G][A][M][E][S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >putting each url on separate lines instead of grouping them logically by SLD
    >inconsistent ordering of the bare versions and the www. versions

    *triggered*

  26. Here's the discussion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's next-gen strategy is to slurp up as much usage data off of end user machines as possible, and to get businesses to invest as much money as possible in azure (so they can use the spare CPU\Memory), in order to build a massive data-set to feed their cognitive services AI's which to Microsoft, is the next-gen killer app. This explains their purchase of Linked-in; they want to understand organizations, why they hire, and what job roles are the most profitable for them to go after, and also market to them. If they were interested in training people to be great support staff, they'd make the infrastructure easy to understand and would've kept technet going. Instead even after all the lynda.com training in the world, you still won't know where all the intentional pitfalls, intentional bugs, and placebo buttons are placed. These are intentional actions, along with required updates, to force organizations into keeping a subscription to Microsoft; after-all, you never want the mafia to push a bad patch and take down your infrastructure for days, right? It's like paying off the mafia.

    Meanwhile, if that strategy doesn't pan out, they are slowly locking down the windows platform as much as possible and placing as many barriers to entry and exit as possible on their current platform. From their perspective Apple and Google have built walled gardens which ensure users won't move to Microsoft's infrastructure any time soon, so they are always going to be losing out unless they do the same thing. Really, these app stores are literally "welding the car hood shut" on the hardware and need to be outlawed right along with paying money for in-game currencies (which is gambling at the root of it) and other such nonsense we've allowed silicon valley to distract itself with. Fact is, there's 30 years of standardization in the Personal Computer and lots of work went into that, for that to become a captive market to these bozo's is insane.

    The problem with this strategy is very simply that regulations on infrastructure are only going to get more restrictive and require tighter security and better compliance as systems admins and programmers age and the industry matures; you will literally have compliance meetings where the old sales pitches will be met with "not this shit again, get out.". Windows 10 is not, and never will be, HIPPA, SARBOX, or PCI Compliant, and is in general bad for ISO 27001\2 compliance because it doesn't provide anything up and over Windows 7 as far as security is concerned but introduces all sorts of new loopholes and problems. Any corporation with extremely scalar infrastructure, up above the 1000 to 2000 user range, is going to be forced into adopting a vendor-neutral information technology strategy, and those strategies are going to trickle down into small businesses. E.G. Stories have been tricking out about business system projects migrating to vendor neutral server hardware, namely Linux or Oracle systems at large companies, because of compliance issues.

    At the end of the day, Microsoft's technologies are maybe 1 to 2 generations ahead of open source software libraries which have become good enough for most intents and purposes. If Microsoft doesn't pull off its cognitive services gamble, and there's a pretty substantial chance they won't, then they, along with Apple and Google, are going to find themselves walled into their own shrinking gardens as people escape into standards based open source infrastructure. It will be the geeks at first, then the large and medium sized businesses, then SMB and the end user market will follow. There are a lot of legal battles the RIAA\MPAA and Microsoft will fight to wall consumers in further. Frankly, Silicon valley and Hollywood are further down on the list behind the migrants and H1B's, and what will end up happening is they will get annihilated by the new middle class that is coming because their patience for such usury will be razor thin. E.G. Expect a new consumer organizations to get funded by donation as people realize they n

  27. Still no Visual Studio RT by tepples · · Score: 1

    my cynical self makes me wonder if this is a trial balloon for upcoming releases of Windows.

    I'll believe it's a trial balloon for eliminating third-party stores once Visual Studio is available in the form of a "Windows Store app".

    1. Re: Still no Visual Studio RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :D !!!!!

      On the money there.

      I was thinking the same thing earlier this week. Microsoft has a huge developer community and they're shackled to WPF on VS'15. It's going to take some time to get their own offerings up to UWP.

      If they play their cards right they can move development to the cloud. Eliminate VS and just enable code in the same environment as team services. The days of 3hr VS installs needs to go away already.

  28. More frequent hostnames go near the top by tepples · · Score: 1

    putting each url on separate lines instead of grouping them logically by SLD

    Some hosts parsers do not understand more than one hostname per line, though recent Windows supports up to nine.

    inconsistent ordering of the bare versions and the www. versions

    Ideally, a hosts parser would use a Bloom filter to cache a large file. But because most operating systems instead use a linear scan, more frequently accessed hostnames should go near the top. If you're using it to work around flaky ISP DNS, hostnames you use frequently should go above hostnames you're blocking. Thus the output of a tool that automatically sorts entries by access frequency might look inconsistent in this manner.

  29. Qualifications for GFY positions at Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would seem the industry of tech companies telling their "customers" to go fuck themselves is booming. When I read this beautifully moving piece of art it brought me to tears.

    "This version of Windows was made to help protect you and your device by exclusively running Windows Store apps."

    Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo beautiful...

    Which courses should I take to prepare myself for a job in this rewarding, challenging and growing field? Does Microsoft have any internships available?

  30. so another useless edition, keep driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just keep hawking ltsb 1607, it's the only edition you can tame and relatively stable without the cruft. What a shame it's not available in stores.

  31. FAIL by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    There is a full taskbar, a start button, desktop icons even, and I'm seeing apps with a menu bar.
    So I'm thinking people will mistake it for a full version of Windows again. Unless this is just an internal version or something.
    I mean, regedit?, explorer.exe?, aren't those Win32 applications?
    Now I'm learning that a large subset of Win32 is included in the UWP platform. Well done. So, is Metro dead or something? If that's just a power grab and a way to get devs to write Win32 applications that don't run on Windows 7 and 8, and we get to be smothered by gigabytes of updates anyway, that doesn't feel that interesting anymore.

    Now, is there any chance we can get a forward compatible linux desktop one day? Past 2020 or 2023, I wonder how we'll be supposed to run commercial, freeware, proprietary etc. software.
    Should I install Windows 7 while I still can? Had I migrated to XP 64 instead of Ubuntu 10.04 years back, I would have had about four years of ability to play games and run properly working software and drivers.

    1. Re: FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows RT did the same thing, all of win32 is there, it is just a kernel policy that block all win32 apps that are not signed by MS. If you connect a debugger to the first Windows RT version you just have to flip a single bit in kernel memory and you can run any app (7zip, putty etc. were ported to arm and would run if you did the hack)

  32. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    m$ killing off windoze nicely. But whateva if you don't know shit about computers then use SteamOS otherwise Ubuntu.
    why m$ is still alive.... fuck knows...

  33. Death Sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for anyone who posts a story passing off PR like this as a "leak." Firing Squad. Hanging. Lethal Injection. Guillotine. All at once.
     
    And for the editor who posted this story:Castration.

  34. Just don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has always produced crap. It's inevitable and sad. Just buy a Mac or install Linux and you'll be much happier. I know, I know by making this change you'll have to learn something new. I know that's frightening. I assure you it's worth it.

  35. Re:I love how M$ played [W][O][R][D][G][A][M][E][S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there's yandex and baidu
    and also yacy search appliance
    stop being ignorant?

  36. windows gets even more sketchy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like another push that will, ultimately, benefit linux more than windows. Good job microsoft! I hope they keep chasing customers away with this heavy handed bs. Linux is not a "small" hurdle anymore. Most people, with windows, only have it because something they do requires it....like gaming or office shit.

  37. MSFT should make it a user option by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    Maybe when you get a new PC/laptop, the question should be asked up front. Do you want to make your PC/Laptop more secure/easier to use/similar to your iPhone (with some small print saying that it will become a cloud-only appliance). If you answer yes then it sets itself to be that. You should also be able to switch between the two modes of operation if the need arises.

  38. Microsoft Surface Hub has it already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company has the Microsoft Surface Hub and it uses the said version. Only allows App Store apps. Working well for the device considering its use for collaboration and multi user use.

  39. Leaked or not Screenshot by b783719 · · Score: 1

    Regardless of the source, if this is Windows 10 Cloud, a face palm through the head won't even be enough to express the failure on this.

    It's like they don't even know why Window RT failed.