Slashdot Mirror
Sweden Pledges To Cut All Greenhouse Gas Emissions By 2045 (independent.co.uk)
Sweden has announced ambitious plans to completely phase out greenhouse gas emissions by 2045. The nation also reaffirmed the urgency of tackling climate change and called for all countries to "step up and fulfill the Paris Agreement." The Independent reports: "Our target is to be an entirely fossil-fuel-free welfare state," said Climate Minister Isabella Lovin. "We see that the advantages of a climate-smart society are so huge, both when it comes to health, job creation and also security. Being dependent on fossil fuels and gas from Russia is not what we need now,â she added. All parties but the far-right Sweden Democrats party agreed to pass the law in the coming month, which will oblige the government to set tougher goals to cut fossil fuel emissions every four years until the 2045 cut-off date. Plans also include a 70 per cent cut to emissions in the domestic transport sector by 2030. The Government said the target would require domestic emissions to be cut by at least 85 per cent and the remaining emissions would be offset by planting trees or by sustainable investments abroad. The law is expected to enter into force as early as 2018.
We've gone past a point of no return. On top of that, an almost 30 year plan? When governments make 5-year plans they generally fall apart...
Good. Why do we need to compete against each other when we have the technology to almost live in a utopia? Are you a misanthrope?
Mostly random stuff.
Welfare has a very different meaning outside the US. It does not bear a negative connotation unlike there.
She is from the swedish "enviroment party" / greens.
Generally called the watermelon party in sweden, green on the outside, red on the inside with small brown seeds.
The party is big on promising without delivering. It is also big on cuddling with islamists.
Well, if they try to eliminate all fossil fuels and remain competitive with the rest of the developed world at the same time,
They aren't. They're going to remain cooperative with the rest of the developed world. You know, exactly unlike England and the USA. Brexit and Trump, two big fat signs saying "we're dumbshits".
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
And then there's us with our orange shithead at the helm ramping back up on burning coal and oil, for no other reason except greed.
You're not taking into consideration the large influx of Muslims into those developed nations. Their birth rate is way higher than the native population's birth rate. Give them a couple of decades and they will be the majority of the population.
Welfare has a very different meaning outside the US. It does not bear a negative connotation unlike there.
The former Communist East Germany was a welfare state. Zero unemployment, free medical care, etc.
However, that did not mean that the folks there were living "well" when compared to the folks next door in the former Democratic West Germany next door. When folks are willing to risk their lives, crawling under barbed wire an jumping over walls, under a hail of machine gun fire, to escape the welfare state . . . well (fittingly), all is not necessarily well in a welfare state.
Oddly enough, the former East Germany was officially named (by themselves), the "German Democratic Republic", which it, as a dictatorship, clearly wasn't. The former West Germany called themselves, the "Federal Republic Of Germany, also known as just "FROG". Which is confusing, because the English call the French, "The Frogs", while the Germans call the English, "The Tommies". And the united Germany is something what the United States would call Socialist.
All this just indicates that nomenclatures don't necessarily travel very well.
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
The evidence is only able to suggest that a simple majority of us are dumb-shits.
Some people are dumbshits because they voted for these things, and the rest of us are dumbshits because we couldn't figure out a way to stop them even though we outnumber them.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Welfare has a very different meaning outside the US. It does not bear a negative connotation unlike there.
The system does not, the recipients are a very mixed bag. On the one hand, most of us are proud that we have a system that will take care of everyone from cradle to grave with many forms of social security and benefits of various kinds. I don't want to see people living in tent camps or people who can't get treatment because they lack health insurance and that we take care of people that are injured, sick and infirm, mentally challenged and so on. That we have a work life that has regulated vacations, sick days, maternity leave, paternity leave, overtime to allow employees to combine work and family life and to prevent employees from being abused. Long resignation periods, unemployment benefits and re-education programs to allow people caught by shifting needs to find new work without drastic and abrupt changes.
All of that said, it's a constant balance between the worthy recipients and people who just want to be welfare queens, that don't want to work but play the system to get every benefit they can have and commit fraud to get benefits they don't. And it's tough, because every so often there's people in the media who'd genuinely would like to work and pay taxes and contribute to society but who also genuinely can't who feel they're under constant suspicion and looked down on by other people as lazy bums who simply won't work. And I don't have any good solution for that because we need those control systems, we can't base ourselves on trust alone. There are people who claim unemployment benefits and work off the record. There are people who claim to be a single mum and get extra support while actually living as a couple. There are people who've tricked the doctor to get disability benefit who seem very healthy the rest of the time.
But that we want the system, no doubt. Even though there's always disagreements about particular forms and implementations of benefits programs, overall we want them.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
They are already a welfare state where all people have healthcare, good schools (by US standards) for all, kindergarten and of course support for poor people. Do not try to look down at them. It won't work. They are actually more humane than you.
It amazes me how much hand wringing is done over potential abuse of socialized basic needs, while billions are poured into crony pork barrels without batting an eyelash.
Lead by example to reach a common goal so that other countries don't produce CO2 either? And then put a tariff on anything coming from the United States of Donald Trump.