Slashdot Mirror


Disney Thinks High Schools Should Let Kids Take Coding In Place of Foreign Languages

theodp writes: Florida lawmakers are again proposing a contentious plan that would put coding and foreign language on equal footing in a public high school student's education. Under a proposed bill students who take two credits of computer coding and earn a related industry certification could then count that coursework toward two foreign language credits.

"I sort of comically applaud that some would want to categorize coding as a foreign language," said Miami-Dade Schools Superintendent Alberto Carvalho. "Coding cannot be seen as an equivalent substitute." Disclosure records show that Walt Disney Parks and Resorts has three lobbyists registered to fight in support of the bill. Disney did not return an email seeking comment, but State Senator Jeff Brandes said the company's interest is in a future workforce... Disney has provided signature tutorials for the nation's Hour of Code over the past three years, including Disney's Frozen princess-themed tutorial.

10 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. No by negRo_slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Coding is not for everyone and not everyone will gain even a modest benefit from learning coding. Furthermore this shit is going to be highly automated over the coming decade or two. We need to teach kids stuff to make them well rounded, not just a fucking outdated cog.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    1. Re:No by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think my bigger issue is that programming languages and spoken human languages are two rather different thing. While both are "languages" in that they are descriptive, structured and functional, they really serve pretty vastly different purposes, and I'm not at all sure one gains the same value from coding as from foreign languages.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:No by ElectraFlarefire · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Expose every kid to programming? Sure! Force every kid to 'be able to program' no.
      Treat it like Ceramics or Drama.. A pass should be 'I did the exercises and now I know what it's like'.
      And like those subjects, those who really like it/are good at it will continue on and do the 'real' programming/CS subjects. Those who have no affinity at all for it can move on to what they are good at.

    3. Re: No by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hardly anyone takes typing

      How old are you? Because I had it 3 times. Elementary school (which was a private school), once in 7th grade and then again in 10th. Prior to that people that graduated mostly couldn't type and weren't at all prepared for the workforce at the time. This is back when you could proudly put your WPM and the fact that you knew how to use Wordperfect AND MS Office on your Resume.

      Math is required K-12.

      Now it is. Once upon the a time math was reserved for a certain class.

      Writing is required K-12.

      Now it is. Once upon a time not everyone got to learn how to read and write.

      In 50 years I expect some one whining when adding Quantum Computing to the K-12 curriculum and you Luddites to have the exact same arguments as to why kids don't need to be learning it.

    4. Re:No by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Close but not quite there. The problem is there is no basic coding language. It would be like teaching 4 completely different versions of Japanese (not far off the mark) and to make it even more interesting, new versions could come out and old versions die. Before anything can be done about teaching a computer programming language a new one needs to be designed from the ground up that much more closely aligns to the English language and the language of mathematics including it symbol. It should not be some bullshit excuse to feed billions in profits into some shit company like M$.

      New language, free of copyright and patents and that adheres to rules of English and maths. Until them the corporate douche bag, ass hat, greedy fuckwits can bugger off.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. Why is it either/or? by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does it have to be either/or? Why can't kids learn Spanish AND Python?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  3. Re: No and screw Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Disney that just outsourced their IT to foreign h1b contractors? That Disney?

  4. Re:Coding achieves the "expand your mind" objectiv by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your mind doesn't exist in one dimension. So anything that "expands your mind" isn't necessarily a suitable replacement for something else that "expands your mind".

    Greek and Latin are valuable because they give you access to the mind and thoughts of other people. The same for foreign languages. Programming languages don't do that, except in a very narrow domain.

    The failure of US language instruction is due to a stubborn unwillingness to change. We've known for fifty years or more that human language acquisition ability rapidly fades at adolescence, and yet we continue to to insist on waiting until adolescence to teach kids foreign language.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  5. Re:Coding achieves the "expand your mind" objectiv by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't necessarily have an objection to some form of coding requirement. However...

    So, if you look at the foreign language requirement for what it is (an "expand your mind" requirement)

    "Expand your mind"? That's really vague. Just a few things foreign language requirements help with that coding doesn't:

    -- English grammar and usage. Many good writers and speakers have noted that they first really understand grammar and details of English usage when they study a foreign language. Now, of course it's possible to refine one's language use without formal grammar training, but the process of deconstructing a foreign language is often helpful to understand one's own.
    -- English etymology and vocabulary use. Particularly if one studies Latin-based language like Spanish, French, or Italian, one gains knowledge of Latinate roots, which are often helpful in figuring out Latin-based English words. Frequently in the first few years of language instruction, you'll learn a lot more English vocabulary through relationships with the other language. Germanic languages also are helpful in learning new English words, due to common older roots.
    -- Communication skills. A lot of students who just take a couple years of a language in high school or whatever don't really get a proficient speaking level, but that's largely due to lack of practice and subsequent failure to "keep up" the training. Nevertheless, for many students who do take the oral skills seriously, languages like Spanish can be incredibly helpful for communicating with customers/users and other job contacts in many professions. If you have an opportunity, doing something like Mandarin or Japanese can open yet other doors.
    -- As one learns another language, generally one learns about other cultures too. Which again is often an introspective exercise in learning about your own culture -- you don't realize your assumptions about the word often until you contrast them with someone else's. This can be a very eye-opening exercise for young people.

    None of this is an argument against coding. But there are more specific things language requirements do, aside from basic skills in that language or "expanding your mind" (whatever that means).

    I think that it is not too much of a stretch to think that coding will eventually become the Latin and Greek of our culture.

    Huh. I'm not sure even how to begin responding to this. The reason Latin and Greek were taught in schools commonly until the mid-20th century is because they not only served as a common communication system in many fields, were the basis of many modern languages, and were the most common languages of historical documents over a span of more than 2000 years, but also were the foundation of much of Western culture and political systems. There's still a vast amount of classical, medieval, and early modern literature unavailable in translation -- and when I saw "literature" I mean all documents, including scientific and technical advances, as well as cultural artifacts.

    While I'm not arguing for a return to Latin or Greek requirements, I don't think it's a coincidence that the U.S. government started wildly straying from the original restrictions on federal power in the early to mid 20th century as knowledge of Latin/Greek and related Roman/Greek history (and political science) decreased. Sure, it's possible to read about these things in English in translation, but the widespread use of Latin led to a promotion of related cultural knowledge (see above), including political and philosophical questions. The Founders of the U.S. all knew their history very well and designed our government in various ways to prevent recurrence of problems that happened in ancient societies. All of this is largely forgotten these days, at best a marginal sidenote to history courses in many public school curricula.

    And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Latin and Greek had even more benefits for learning about E

  6. Re:Babel, tower of (or was it Hanoi?) by jimtheowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have to assume that this is coming from a uni-lingual Anglophone perspective. Although English is presently the international language of business, it does not mean that it will remain so over time, neither that everyone should conform to your expectations of convenience.

    The perceived problem is only from your perspective. From mine, knowing more languages is not a problem, it is an exercise in expansion of the brain. Music is even better. Further more, I find English to by a somewhat dry language. I express myself differently in French and Spanish and would love to be fluent in Russian, German, Mandarin and Cantonese.

    As for ASCII have it your way, but I prefer EBCDIC.