Slashdot Mirror
French Politician Uses Hologram To Hold Meetings In Two Cities At the Same Time (reuters.com)
neutrino38 writes: The French presidential election is approaching fast. One of the candidates, Jean-Luc Melenchon, used a hologram to hold two public meetings at once. With a political program that is mostly socialist and very left leaning, some people pointed out that he used private innovation to stand out from the crowd. Reuters notes that this is "not the first politician to employ such technology," adding that "in 2014, then-Turkish prime minister Tayyip Erdogan used a huge hologram of himself to attract wider support, while India's Narendra Modi trounced the opposition with a campaign that included holograms of his speeches in villages across the country." You can watch part of one of Melenchon's virtual meetings here.
some people pointed out that he used private innovation to stand out from the crowd.
Somebody please explain the significance of selected statement here. Does being a candidate of the Socialist Party mean that one should be coy like a little princess? Isn't that equivalent to using alien technology for a politician?
What was he doing, surrendering to two invaders at once?
The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
What's Mine is mine and what's yours is Mine —The State.
What are his specific big issues?
Has anyone ever seen this guy and Palpatine in the same room together?
FWIW, his name is Melenchon, not Melanchon. Is it so hard to copy/paste correctly?
Now Politicians cans speak out of both sides of their mouths, in more than one place at once.
You have survivor bias. An extreme candidate without such an advantage loses and is forgotten. You should also look at the /. story today about how the Brexit vote and Trump used psychometric profiles for similar "new technologies make unexpected outcomes happen".
That said, I know nothing about this candidate, and have no reason to believe (or disbelieve) he is an extremist.
Your ad here. Ask me how!
If Reuters actually has the balls to call someone "far-left" right in the title of the article, you can rest fucking assured they're an extremist.
thumbs up-ité
In his holographic speech, he promised to be the most transparent candidate ever!
Just kidding, he's a socialist - he promised to send guys with guns to take all your shit, unless you send it to him first.
Can we go easy on the word 'Hologram'? This is likely a pepper's ghost effect; as is 90%+ of what's being called a 'hologram' these days.
It's a neat effect, and the Reuters image reveals a great reference for the setup (particularly interesting lighting rig), but lets reserve the h word for real examples of the phenomenon.
Was Hatsune Miku there too? How about Yandere-chan? The neighbor in Hello Neighbor?
How could I have missed that? Glitch in the Matrix?
You are generally allowed to keep your personal effects and such, which is why socialism has any popularity.
Yes but you're not allowed to put advertising on your personal blog because that would be private wealth production. And we all know absolutely everyone's income in the social economy comes from monetizing a blog so socialism is totally fucked.
When the technological revolution is here to serve the communist revolution...
Frickin' soviets...
Marketers seem eager to abuse and misuse establish terms for advertising purposes. First "hoverboard", now "hologram".
As best as I can tell (TFA is devoid of details), this is a glorified version of the system used at Hatsune Miku" concerts - a simple rear projection onto a glass screen. A slightly more sophisticated version uses multiple cameras surrounding the person whose image is being broadcast, and switches between them depending on where the observer camera is positioned. That creates the illusion that the observer can move around the image in 3D, but the illusion only works for the observer being tracked. Anyone else sees a 2D image which rotates depending on where the designated observer moves, not based on where they themselves move.
A true hologram is not conveyed as an image. It is conveyed as an interference pattern created by taking a Fourier transform of a 3D light field. When you take another Fourier transform of that interference pattern (e.g. shine onto it coherent light equivalent to the light that originally created the pattern), it reconstructs the original 3D light field - a hologram.
India's Narendra Modi trounced the opposition with a campaign that included holograms of his speeches in villages across the country.
He did? I thought he ran a campaign that was high on constant texting to citizens everywhere, and during the time that he was banned from the US, he used video-conferencing to attend the places he was invited to, but this is the first time I'm reading about him in a hologram image
According to the wik, "The development of the laser enabled the first practical optical holograms that recorded 3D objects to be made in 1962 by Yuri Denisyuk in the Soviet Unionand by Emmett Leith and Juris Upatnieks at the University of Michigan, USA." Commies and socialized public universities gave us the hologram.
Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
You cannot wash away blood with blood
That's the dumbest thing I'll read today, thanks for "innovating" lol
HobNob:
Holographically Originated Being, Negotiating Official Business.
What about your lack of balls to define someone beyond a 1-word label, lol?
you americans should stop calling someone socialist, unless you understand what socialism is, and what the difference with communism is, and why the USSR was fascist (more examples : see trump), not communist.
It has been discovered that candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon exists only as a hologram. No traces of his life on Earth have been discovered up to now, and he exists just under the form of a computer bot that once in a while interacts with real world through holograms. Further investigations are casting doubts about the reality of other politicians in the world: the lack of connections between politics and world problems is makes a strong evidence for the case. Is the world actually managed by an algorithm ? More at 11.00.
Funny how political extremists always seem to be the first to embrace new technologies to further their agendas. Hitler for example used the latest magnetic tape recording technology of his days to appear as if he was doing live broadcast in a city while he was in another.
Yes, and Trump uses Twitter to redefine reality in a way never seen before. There's definitely a pattern going on there. OMG!! That means Trump must be a Socialist!!
I hoped that this is technical web and the first comment will be about word 'holography' misuse. But all just arguing that some politicians use videocalls for whatever reason.
To clarify: These are not holograms. Hologram is a capture of light field in given plane. Such recording holds intensity of light (like classical photography) + Phase of the light wave. And yeah we are speking of capturing in units of nanometers per hologram element (like pixel). When reproduced, uniform coherent light (LASER apparently) is casted on that recoding you, as a wacher, have a perception of the scene behind the capture plane as if you would be there with all benefits of real life like stereoscopic vision (depth perception) and looking arround the corner when move a bit or a lot (visibility). You can even rotate your head and won't lost the stereoscopic vision, unlike in 3D cinema. If we assume full colored hologram, it is indistinguishabe from reality. For naked eye and for camera.
Those politicians are just poor bluescreen capture projected on thin cloth so the rest of the theatre scene is real. This is trick like from the beginings of cinematography just spiced by starwars popularized word [hologram] misuse.
What are the odds that he claimed two lots of expenses?
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
He's far left by American standards, but just regular left by French ones.
The far-left in France is occupied by communists, and those called "socialists" in France (and Europe generally) like this guy or the current president, aren't what Americans call socialists.
Spider Jersualem will sort them out.
To an American conservative "Socialist" means all the worst parts about the USSR combined with anything they don't like. Actual socialism as practiced in Europe has nothing to do with it. They couldn't describe it even slightly accurately, because that would require genuine knowledge of the subject.
He's far left by American standards, but just regular left by French ones.
The far-left in France is occupied by communists, and those called "socialists" in France (and Europe generally) like this guy or the current president, aren't what Americans call socialists.
So to call Mélenchon a Communist is incorrect. Not only because he is not tagged so, but also for fundamental divergences.
For example : PC in France keeps promoting productivisme (producing a lot) and internationalism (free movement for workers). While Mélenchon calls extremely loudly for less & better production, and for joint-protectionism : we may exchange things, services and workers but with solidarity. Not at he expense of environment, local workers neither remote. So... see: these are not minor details. On the contrary : it makes Mélenchon's position quite different from extreme left and communists. And it makes Mélenchon's position simply socialist unlike those of PS in France.
At the root "Socialism" here is a tag for someone that will take more money from me and give it to someone who didn't end up with a high paying job in technology.
Is that definition inaccurate for this candidate?
You Europeans should stop thinking that your state-run schools told you the truth.
I agree that the USSR and Nazi Germany had many things in common. They have little in common with the liberal democratic republic headed by Donald Trump.
Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
American English is a dialect with differences from English elsewhere. If you want to communicate with us, use our language.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
Leftards love to use the word "fascist" but you do not know what it means.
Socialism works in smaller groups, where the populace stays aligned for a common goal and individual contributions are genuinely necessary and appreciated. In a large society, as history has proven time and again, it simply fails miserably when a certain number realizes they can consume more than produce, and the producers in turn notice they're stuck contributing more than is fair. The divide continues to grow until the socialism model deteriorates and ultimately fails.
Heck, even communism can work in extremely small communities. That is, if the populace agrees with their leader and the leader truly has the best interest of the commune. Scaled up it too fails miserably.
Leftists love to think they're the brightest, the most well educated, most insightful bunch in America. If that were true, why are they the group bitching about everything yet doing nothing but destroying things in 'protests'? These are people who perceive themselves enduring huge amounts of personal struggle, yet fail to succeed on their own. For every setback or failure, there's always an external influence keeping them from achieving what is "rightfully" theirs. They believe in guarantees, in safety nets, in pacification, and above all admiration for their 'specialness'. The fact of the matter is this type of person tells themselves they can't, so of course they can't. But then it's got to be someone else's fault, because accepting failure means you're a failure, and nobody likes "feeling" like a failure, right? Meanwhile the portion of the populating they denigrate and reject as "inferior", the people they will openly call names and label, are out there building a life for themselves. American Liberals are imploding under the sheer weight of their own bullshit, and it's funny as hell to watch.
Sincerely,
One of the labelled :)
> t's just flash and bling. But then again, it works for Hollywood celebrities
Flash and bling worked out pretty well for the Celebrity Apprentice too. :)
I've noticed that it's very difficult to predict how well a candidate will do once after are elected and become president or whatever. Candidates that look pretty good turn out to be ineffective leaders, candidates that seem unqualified sometimes turn out to be very effective. I hope that pattern repeats in US.
Not a hologram, It's simply projection onto a surface on the stage. Just like how Gorillaz does their live performances.
Notice how they made sure NO photos of the projection are shown....
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
He is still a communist, an opportunist communist, but still a communist.
That must come in handy for someone used to talking out of both sides of his mouth at the same time
You should also look at the /. story today about how the Brexit vote and Trump used psychometric profiles for similar "new technologies make unexpected outcomes happen".
Which story was that? Not sarcastic, that actually sounds interesting but I can't find it.
Nope, no sig