Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Have Invented Paper That You Can Print With Light, Erase With Heat, and Reuse 80 Times (qz.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Quartz: Nearly 1% of carbon emissions annually can be attributed to paper production, even though we recycle much of the paper we produce. Yadong Yin has a solution. He and his colleagues at the University of California at Riverside have invented a type of paper that can be printed on using just light, erased by heating, and reused up to 80 times. Yin created nanoparticles, which are a million times smaller than the thickness of human hair, with the dye Prussian blue, or its chemical analogues, and titanium oxide, which is commonly used in white wall paint. This mixture is then applied to normal paper. When the coating is exposed to ultraviolet light, electrons from titanium oxide move to the dye in the nanoparticle. This addition of electrons makes the blue dye turn white. Focusing the ultraviolet light into shapes, you can print white words on a blue background -- or blue words on a white background, which are easier to read. If left alone, the paper reverts to its original state in five days. That process can be accelerated by heating the paper to 120 C (250 F) for 10 minutes.

15 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. New printer by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now all we need is a new printer that doesn't jam when the paper is not perfectly smooth.

    1. Re:New printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now all we need is a new printer that doesn't jam when the paper is not perfectly smooth.

      Well, no. Not quite.

      All we truly need to fix the problem of printer jams is a society that doesn't believe in going backwards with technology in order to feed some perverse addiction of putting ones and zeros on paper.

      While I applaud the new research for helping with carbon emissions, it's pretty sad when we've been talking about "paperless" for 20 fucking years and have still failed to actually do it in damn near every aspect.

      And yes, it's pretty easy to do. When gas rose to over $4/gallon, people started looking for alternate means of transportation. When you make something expensive enough, innovation happens. Or in the case of going paperless, common sense.

    2. Re:New printer by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Paper has some useful properties that help it remain popular. If we can replicate or better these properties with technology, we can finally go paperless.

      Cheap, disposable: Compared to a tablet computer, paper is very cheap and damage is rarely a big deal.

      Just works: No battery to charge, folds up if required, can be marked with any pen or pencil and there is no UI to learn or fumble with.

      Permanent: People trust printed documents not to change and signatures/stamps count for something.

      Archival: Paper lasts a long time, and people know how to protect it. Digital files get lost, formats go obsolete and unreadable, same for the storage media. Backup still seems to be hard compared to "file in fire-proof safe".

      Size: Even just A4/letter size tablets are expensive, let alone A3. Larger sizes can't be folded either.

      Compatibility: Different tablets have different ways of distributing and accessing documents.

      There are a few areas where paperless wins. Machine translation is getting very good. But it's still a struggle. Where I work we are replacing paper drawings with Raspberry Pi and monitors, basically glorified PDF readers. It only works because our CAD documents are exported to PDF for easy viewing and stored on a file server somewhere, but it's far from a turnkey, universal solution.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:New printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only your durability / hardcopy / archive argument really hold water and that's exactly what this ‘invention’ is useless at.
      * Paper is expensive. You don't realise that because you aren't paying the price in the store. But it takes up space, ordering time and other overhead and it turns out to be much more expensive than any digital-based solution (be it e-reader, computer, ...).
      * My e-reader also ‘just works’ (battery lasts forever, can write on pages) and people can no longer live without their phones anyway so for all intents and purposes they just work too.
      * Big paper sizes were never there for usability; people hate it. Columns are a coping mechanism, but they only go so far. Big paper sizes are used because they're slightly cheaper, but even now I notice some newspapers are switching to half size because their readership prefers it. The ones that don't simply cannot afford it.
      As I see it, for most purposes there's a more-or-less two-way split happening between use cases that were formerly covered by paper:
      * Temporary reading / graphing / ... material.
      * Archival storage.
      The ‘invention’ discussed here is useless for both. It's useless.

    4. Re:New printer by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      This was my first thought.
      I've seen it, in a non-profit environment : using some decade old HP laser printer, with seemingly perfect reliability (compared to your typical inkjet that you need to re-buy every year if you use it seasonally), enough life left in the toner to not care about it.

      Yet, the obvious "good idea" there was to print on old worthless already printed paper, just print to the other side. It's not so much the paper jams that are a problem, but all the dust, dirt and ash particles found on the old papers (those that have started lying around are even worse than those filed away for years). This gets into the printing rollers or whatever you call them and so your printer develops printing streaks, making stuff hard to read (at worse missing important things) or too unprofessional.
      And then, you're stuck needing maintenance on a laser printer even though everything was okay (parallel cable, CUPS and networking, toner, printer, paper supply). Time was bought by putting a different old printer in place.

      What would be needed on a regular laser printer is a warning : "Please only feed NEW printer to the paper. It's more environmentally friendly"

      ---------

      With that "UV paper", hopefully the printer is simplified enough and made trivially easy to clean with no special equipment. The "paper" itself needs to be easy to clean. If you don't even need contact between the "paper" and printer parts (save for feeding the "paper" in and getting it out) it might be easy enough to use even folded "UV paper" (e.g., some machines have a slot where you can put banknotes in, they work with banknotes that were folded carelessly)

  2. Perfect for the Trump administration. by Required+Snark · · Score: 3, Funny

    They can use this for all internal and external communications and never have to admit that they lied or changed their position.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  3. Sneaky contract changes by Rande · · Score: 2

    See? This is your employment contract with your signature at the bottom, and it says right here in clause 13a that we're allowed to ride you like a donkey every 2nd Tuesday.

  4. Useful by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That process can be accelerated by heating the paper to 120 C (250 F) for 10 minutes.

    Or, just forget your documents in the car in summer one day and have them all erased.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  5. Re:Scientists have turned paper into hazardous was by arboviral · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's likely to be pretty safe. The process uses Prussian blue (iron hexacyanoferrate) and titanium oxide (presumably titanium (IV) oxide, given the reference to white paint). Prussian blue is non-toxic and highly stable, despite containing cyanide groups (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_blue#Adverse_effects) and is actually used as a treatment for heavy metal poisoning. Titanium (IV) oxide is so safe it's often used as a food additive, as well as already being a component of many papers - it helps make them more white and opaque. Safety issues have been raised over some sizes of titanium oxide nanoparticle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium_dioxide#Health_and_safety) but despite this they're still widely used in products like sunscreen.

  6. This will be more expensive by ITRambo · · Score: 2

    Paper is cheap. It can be recycled. Trees are renewable. I don't see the need for this new paper, other than possible use in a Mission Impossible movie.

  7. Paper is permanent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point of paper is that it's semi-permanent. That's why it's used so much. This does absolutely nothing to reduce the need for traditional paper. You could do the same thing with a decent tablet already, and for most things you just don't.

  8. Re:Sounds useless by omnichad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It can be reused/reprinted 80 times. It doesn't say it will stay wrinkle/crease free for 80 reuses. And when it does get thrown out, it's full of ferric ferrocyanide, which is fairly toxic.

    Any amount of wear on the paper and nobody will want it second-hand. Or, nobody will buy their own paper because it's too expensive. They just won't return the paper back to the convention staff, etc.

  9. Re:Homophobic Nazis? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like the sort of people who would fly into a rage and violently protest the speech of a gay Jew? Like in Berkeley last week?

    I can't stand Milo, but he has the right to speak his mind just like anyone else. Shutting him down was a shameful example of muzzling free speech. Left unchecked, "social justice" seems to morph into the "tyranny of the politically correct" every goddamn time.

    Supporting "free speech" means supporting the kind of speech we disagree with or even hate, it doesn't mean allowing only the kind of speech we happen to agree with or find acceptable.

    So to all of you self-righteous silencers out there, if you don't support the kind of speech you detest, you're not supporting free speech. It's a shame that so many people just don't get this.

    Most recently the suppression of opposing opinions as been rebranded as the "no platforming", which is just suppression of free speech under a new, trendy term.

    Again, I can't stand Milo Yiannopoulos- he's a self-loathing toady, but even he gets things right once in a while. While I disagree with 95% of the shit that comes out of his mouth, he should have the right to spew his nonsense just like anyone else.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  10. Xerox did this decades ago by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    I recall decades ago Xerox tried marketing an erasable paper copy machine. Never heard of it? Right. It wasn't popular.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  11. Re:Homophobic Nazis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pointing things out should not involve burning other peoples property or threatening physical violence. And there is a difference between saying all X are Y and actually acting like all X are Y or even going around referring to all X as Y. It's not like anyone could know all X, except when X is a very small group.

    I find Milo to be funny and the reactions to him even more so.