Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Successfully Decode the Genome of Quinoa (bbc.com)

Gr8Apes writes: Scientists have successfully decoded the genome of quinoa, a hugely popular "super-food" because it is well balanced and gluten-free. They have pinpointed one of the genes that they believe control the production of saponins (bitter toxic compounds that protect the plant from predators) which can facilitate the breeding of plants without saponins, resulting in sweeter seeds without having to process them. The scientists also believe that the genetic understanding now gained will allow them to breed shorter, stockier plants that don't fall over as easily, and that these benefits could be gained without the use of genetic modification. Furthermore, the researchers believe the genetic code will rapidly lead to more productive varieties that will push down costs. "We need the price of quinoa to go down by a factor of five," said project leader Professor Mark Tester, from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. "If we get to a similar price to wheat it can be used in processing and in bread making and in many other foods and products. It has the chance to truly add to current world food production." The study has been published in the journal Nature.

10 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Somewhat selfishly, I look forward to this. by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want nuttiness and crunchiness in your rice, add nuts.

  2. Re: Somewhat selfishly, I look forward to this. by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How is it more convenient than rice?

    It doesn't taste like glue.

    If your rice tastes like glue you are cooking it wrong. Try cooking it in stock or at least toss in a few bullion cubes.

  3. What is up with this anti-gluten bullshit? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    quinoa, a hugely popular "super-food" because it is well balanced and gluten-free

    Seriously, wtf? When and why did gluten become an evil boogeyman? Was there a recent research that found gluten causes cancer or something? Or is it just a new age hippie thing?

    Gluten is just wheat protein. It's nutritious. It's how Roman soldiers were able to go everywhere and fight because they had a reliable, portable, long-lasting and nutritious food supply. Wheat is actually the first superfood.

    Yes a tiny percentage of the population can't eat wheat because of celiac or wheat allergies. So what, peanut allergies are far more common and yet I don't see a lot of anti-peanut crusading.

    1. Re:What is up with this anti-gluten bullshit? by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because there's gluten intolerant, and then there's gluten sensitive. Few people are actually gluten intolerant. More people are sensitive (and a lot don't even know that's why they feel terrible, bloated, gassy or whatnot after eating).

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:What is up with this anti-gluten bullshit? by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes it is a hipster thing exploited by the marketing of food companies. I've even seen "Gluten free" on packages of meat....What we're probably seeing here is the nocebo effect perpetuated by mass hysteria.

      I'm having a hard time blaming "hipsters" at this point when I can't tell if greedy food companies are merely marketing, or if they are more responsible for perpetuating or even creating the mass hysteria, especially when you consider the example you provided regarding selling meat, which gives sellers a convenient excuse to increase profit margins.

      If we want to go after something to take out of our food supply, let's go after the real killers, which exceed well beyond allergy concerns. Humans aren't compatible with HFCS, and there's little left to debate on that shit.

  4. Stop apologizing by locater16 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please, stop apologizing for this shit: "and that these benefits could be gained without the use of genetic modification."
    A. No it can't, selective breeding and direct genetic modification end up with the exact same result, and are both "genetic modifications" by any reasonable definition of the term.
    B. This is exactly the same as saying "and these benefits could be gained without the use of wifi!" or "without the use of satellites!" to make "radiation" schizos or flat earthers feel better about themselves. They don't deserve to feel better about themselves; they're crass, ignorant halfwits and don't need their idiotic beliefs affirmed anymore than they already are. And that goes for the stupid assed "gluten free" thing too. Almost no one on earth has celiac disease, and anyone that does can take care of that themselves.
    At no point should scientific results be apologetic, the universe doesn't apologize for existing the way it does, and reporting how it exists should need no apology either.

    1. Re:Stop apologizing by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When most people say 'genetic modification' what they mean is genetic engineering, which is to say, recombinant DNA techniques, which is different than so-called 'conventional' breeding techniques (for example inserting a spinach gene into an orange for disease resistance which is not naturally present in the citrus genepool), although not different enough to warrant the baseless opposition to it . Unfortunately, most people do not know what they are talking about when it comes to plants, agriculture, and genetic engineering

      But I absolutely agree with you that the world should stop bending over to appease the anti-GE contingent. They are the anti-vaxxers of agriculture, and the effects the opposition to genetic engineering has had on the world are just as obscene.

    2. Re:Stop apologizing by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...They don't deserve to feel better about themselves; they're crass, ignorant halfwits and don't need their idiotic beliefs affirmed anymore than they already are. And that goes for the stupid assed "gluten free" thing too. Almost no one on earth has celiac disease, and anyone that does can take care of that themselves...

      Almost no one on earth? In America alone, there are 3 million people who do. Not that any of them would expect an apology from a crass person such as yourself who doesn't believe simple statistics.

      Regarding taking care of that "themselves", gluten is found all over our damn food supply. And much like those who suffer from epilepsy, a fucking warning label can often make all the difference in the world.

      You had a valid point, right up until your ignorance showed up. And no, I don't have celiac disease or epilepsy. I'm merely fortunate enough to not suffer from a compassion deficiency.

  5. Gentetic modification by colin_faber · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The scientists also believe that the genetic understanding now gained will allow them to breed shorter, stockier plants that don't fall over as easily, and that these benefits could be gained without the use of genetic modification.

    I guess plant splicing and selective breading do not count as genetic modification. Who knew? Must have meant direct genetic modification.

  6. Re:Saponins by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a workable issue. Plenty of foods have been bred out of more toxic wild ancestors, like the solanine removed from potatoes or the erucic acid removed from canola. Most plants did not evolve to have their roots or leaves eaten; domestication made them favorable to human consumption. Knowing how to make things better is the first step toward doing it.

    Saponins I think are less of a concern, since they're usually pretty easy to wash off of commercially processed quinoa. I'd be more concerned with producing low oxalic acid varieties.