Slashdot Mirror


New Office Sensors Know When You Leave Your Desk (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: About a year ago, in a widely reported story, journalists at British newspaper the Telegraph found little black boxes installed under their desks. The devices, which had "OccupEye" emblazoned on them, detected if employees were at their workstations. Not shockingly, writers and editors were suspicious, worried that bosses were monitoring their moves, even their bathroom breaks. The National Union of Journalists complained to management about Big Brother-style surveillance. The company insisted the boxes were intended to reduce energy costs, ensuring that empty cubicles weren't overheated or over-air-conditioned, but the damage was done, and the devices were removed. Sensors that keep tabs on more than temperature are already all over offices -- they're just less conspicuous and don't have names that suggest Bond villains. "Most people, when they walk into buildings, don't even notice them," says Joe Costello, chief executive officer of Enlighted, whose sensors, he says, are collecting data at more than 350 companies, including 15 percent of the Fortune 500. They're hidden in lights, ID badges, and elsewhere, tracking things such as conference room usage, employee whereabouts, and "latency" -- how long someone goes without speaking to another co-worker. Proponents claim the goal is efficiency: Some sensors generate heat maps that show how people move through an office, to help maximize space; others, such as OccupEye, tap into HVAC systems.

158 comments

  1. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this new?

    1. Re: News? by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      agreed, they call them security cameras.

  2. Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone wants to micromanage everyone else all in the name of safety/efficiency/feelings etc.

    1. Re:Our society is fucked by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they want to micromanage people in the name of profit.

      Employers aren't using this for anything other than trying to squeeze as much productivity out of people as possible by treating them like robots or animals. This isn't a new trend, as employers have been using monitoring software on computer workstations that determine when people aren't at their desk typing/etc, and keeps track of when they use the bathroom or take a coffee break. It's a terribly short-sighted thing, as people don't function like machines. I'm just glad I work at a job where my output is what's important - that I do the work I'm supposed to, whether I do it quickly or slowly, whether I take breaks or not, and whether I take 30 or 60 minutes for lunch, or whether I waste time posting to Slashdot or not.

    2. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no doubt that this will lead to a "% of time at desk spent" report which will come up during review time as an excuse to give smaller raises.

    3. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get your assigned work done in only a couple of hours, it means you are not being assigned enough work.

    4. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the MBA

    5. Re:Our society is fucked by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      What about people who are waiting for a call?? or are waiting for others to do there part?

    6. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISBN 978-0884271956

    7. Re:Our society is fucked by spatley · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or waiting on there spelling and grammar handbook to be delivered?

    8. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it means I'm doing exactly what I intended.

      If you don't like it and decide to pile more work on me, it means that my hourly rate is about to increase accordingly. It's called "fee-based dissuasion".

      And if you decide to shop around for someone who can do the job and take the abuse, feel free. But don't be surprised if the poor sucker gets a heads up from me and ends up calling that first contract a "loss leader", then applies the same dissuasion technique to subsequent work.

    9. Re:Our society is fucked by dpidcoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, they want to micromanage people in the name of profit.

      No, profit doesn't have a factor in it, at least in what I've seen. It's just metrics for the metric god. The management bureaucracy wants to see numbers which they can then pretend to read like tea leaves. From that point they issue some nonsensical decree ("There are too many commits to the repository! Why can't you guys get your software right the first time! I want to see less commits!") and go pat themselves on the back for being effective managers. In the meantime, the employees who have to deal with that BS expend mental energy trying to make sure whatever they're doing results in good metrics, possibly at the cost of productivity and efficiency.

    10. Re:Our society is fucked by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Depends. If someone can execute 10 tasks in 8 hours, and I can perform the exact same tasks in 4 hours, then what are you going to do?
      - Send me home early?
      - Assign me additional tasks?
      - Assign me additional task and give me a pay rise?
      - Ask me how I manage to work so quickly, and if my methods could help other employees improve their throughput?
      - Promote me?
      - Request a "random" drug test?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    11. Re: Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it means I am more efficient at it and deserve a payraise.

      If my pay is equal to all the others, do not expect me to do more work without more pay.

      It is that simple.

    12. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. If someone can execute 10 tasks in 8 hours, and I can perform the exact same tasks in 4 hours, then what are you going to do?

      - Send me home early?

      - Assign me additional tasks?

      - Assign me additional task and give me a pay rise?

      - Ask me how I manage to work so quickly, and if my methods could help other employees improve their throughput?

      - Promote me?

      - Request a "random" drug test?

      They will attempt #2, but what they will achieve is to make you take 8 hours to finish, or change employers.

      I've finished my work for the year. I will not deliver those things yet because, based on other people's examples, my employer has demonstrated that if I turned them all in today, they'd let me go next month and not pay me for the rest of the year or demand another set of projects for free in the remaining time. Instead I will, as allowed by my contract, work on other projects outside the company, including things I think they will want later. My project estimates are incredibly accurate when I don't have outsider dependencies :D

    13. Re:Our society is fucked by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No, they want to micromanage people in the name of profit.

      They are the same thing. Don't forget what your safety means to your employer. It means you're not taking sick leave. Don't forget what feelings and happiness means to your employer, it means you're energetic and working well.

      It's all about profit in the end, even when it's about safety, or well being, etc. My employer doesn't provide me with free physio because they like me, they do it so I keep working there.

    14. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace both of you with one poor shmuck offshore, and get *MYSELF* a bonus for having reduced costs this quarter.

      The loss of productivity that results will be your remaining coworkers faults anyways.

    15. Re:Our society is fucked by rsimpson · · Score: 1

      Or they are trying to be more efficient.

      We were approached by a company to develop something similar. They were a large organisation with a large number of offices and a large number of roaming contractors. They simply wanted to know how many of their desks and offices were actually in use on any given day so they could scale appropriately. Why pay for 200 offices and desks when you only needed 150 at any given time? They tried manually counting people at desks, but it took too long to audit the building and by the time they reached the end, the data was already inaccurate.

      They simply wanted metrics to help the business.

    16. Re:Our society is fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They can fuck off.

      If you can't be bothered to employ someone and give them a desk, don't employ them. I'm sure the coffee cups and toilets aren't 100% occupied either, and I do not want to work for a firm that optimizes those too much either.

    17. Re:Our society is fucked by Jahta · · Score: 1

      No, they want to micromanage people in the name of profit.

      No, profit doesn't have a factor in it, at least in what I've seen. It's just metrics for the metric god. The management bureaucracy wants to see numbers which they can then pretend to read like tea leaves. From that point they issue some nonsensical decree ("There are too many commits to the repository! Why can't you guys get your software right the first time! I want to see less commits!") and go pat themselves on the back for being effective managers. In the meantime, the employees who have to deal with that BS expend mental energy trying to make sure whatever they're doing results in good metrics, possibly at the cost of productivity and efficiency.

      While I wouldn't disagree that metrics have become a fetish with many management types, and there is a lot of "metrics for the sake of metrics" about, the underlying driver for this kind of employee surveillance is still typically profit. It's the "crank out more units of work with fewer people" mentality. And it's close relative, the "hours at the desk = productivity" mentality which persists despite being debunked.

    18. Re:Our society is fucked by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      This is just another scam sold by Dogbert to the Pointy-Haired Boss.

      Time spent in chair doesn't equal productivity. I could put an inflatable Bozo doll in my chair and be just as productive.

      Time spent typing doesn't equal productivity. I'm not a typist, my product is software, not letters in a document.

      Lines of code certainly don't equal productivity, since I consider many of my most productive days to be those when I end up with fewer lines of code than I started with.

      You cannot measure people with Procrustean standards and fixed metrics. All those are is a lazy managerial excuse. You can use them as a club to threaten to fire people. You can make an idol of them and worship it instead of actually spending time walking the trenches to see what's really going on.

      If you reward people for digging up red jelly beans and punish them for digging up blue ones, you can rest assured that there will be cans of red paint everywhere and people will spend a lot of time that could have been employed digging up jelly beans painting them instead.

    19. Re:Our society is fucked by rsimpson · · Score: 1

      So if you need part of your house repaired or extended, do you employ someone full time as an employee of yours, or do you hire a contractor for the duration of the build? Companies have similar needs where they only need someone for a short duration to do a once off job.

    20. Re:Our society is fucked by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      No, they want to micromanage people in the name of profit.

      Employers aren't using this for anything other than trying to squeeze as much productivity out of people as possible by treating them like robots or animals. This isn't a new trend, as employers have been using monitoring software on computer workstations that determine when people aren't at their desk typing/etc, and keeps track of when they use the bathroom or take a coffee break. It's a terribly short-sighted thing, as people don't function like machines. I'm just glad I work at a job where my output is what's important - that I do the work I'm supposed to, whether I do it quickly or slowly, whether I take breaks or not, and whether I take 30 or 60 minutes for lunch, or whether I waste time posting to Slashdot or not.

      Normal bathroom break, a 5 minute chat every hour, a normal 15 minute break twice a day. But a 2 hour lapse while the employee runs errands or is absent after clocking in, is not acceptable.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    21. Re:Our society is fucked by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      the underlying driver for this kind of employee surveillance is still typically profit.

      I don't disagree that the intentions at the highest level may be profit, but once it exits the mouth of the CEO that part is quickly lost in translation. The people at the high level are far too busy to be bothered with the technical details and just want a summary of whatever they're measuring so they can say "loss in profit wasn't us, our numbers look great!".

      For example: say you're in charge of a department of 20-30 programmers. Upper management is given the directive "more profit". Upper management comes to you and says "your department needs to cut costs", and so the two of you agree on a way to measure this. They're smart enough to know that things like "lines of code" or "number of bug trackers" are easily gamed, so you agree that the metric you're going to use will be "cost per hour of coding". If you reduce the cost per hour of code, that means you've become more efficient right?

      So the first thing you do is start making noise about outsourceing and find a coding sweatshop in india that will write software for $3/hour. You hire 15 indians to start cranking out code for you and boom! You just cut your cost per hour of coding in half. You use the fact that your brilliant management has cut costs in half to justify increased budget and workforce for your department, resulting in no need for layoffs. Your programmers continue to do what they were doing before, with the exception of tasking a few junior programmers who now have the assignment of gaining experience in writing requirements by keeping the indian sweatshop busy writing nonsense programs.

      So in this example, while the original drive may have been profit the end result was basically a really overpriced requirements writing simulator for the guys you want to groom to become project managers.

  3. Summary-gore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't even know WTF I just read.

  4. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do your job, slackers!

    1. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has always been the case for production workers... they need to clock in & out, and some are on incentive pay (aka, piecework). It's just part of the trend towards making jobs into smaller fungible units with interchanging pieces.

      I for one welcome our management overlords.

  5. Productivity! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >how long someone goes without speaking to another co-worker.

    The length of time I go without talking to a co-worker is directly proportional to my productivity.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I was thinking.

      How long have I gone without talking to a co-worker? Not long enough!

    2. Re:Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that is the point. The more people are standing around yapping the less work they are getting done. The point isn't to see how little people are talking to other people but how much.

    3. Re:Productivity! by wafflemonger · · Score: 1

      I don't think that is the point. The current trend is to make sure that your workplace is all collaboration all the time. If you are not talking to your coworkers, they think they have to reduce more barriers, or force the interactions in more ways. No one is thinking that knowledge workers might need quiet to get their work done.

    4. Re:Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US companies (or at least the ones I've worked at) seem to be far more trusting that employees are being useful, so long work gets done, and done well. Yet we have the least protection from employers who can fire anyone at anytime with out the need for a reason. I think this type of environment keeps people a bit more honest and productive.

      Yet in countries like UK, Australia, NZ, places I have also worked - employers work people to the bone, treat them like shit, pay them the least possible, company "benefits or perks" are minimal to non existent, promotion or being rewarded for a job well done - nothing.. Maybe because everyone knows they cant get fired with doing something short of "gross misconduct" or being "let go" with out having to be paid 3 months income.. a recipe for complacent lazy workers :-)

    5. Re:Productivity! by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Until you get big-boy projects that require coordination with other people.

      What do you do then? Send an email and hope for a quick response? Sit at your desk like a good little doggie until the next project management meeting? Or maybe you go talk it over and get back to work.

      The only reason a desk needs an occupancy sensor is for facilities efficiency---or as a crutch for poor hiring and management practices.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    6. Re:Productivity! by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Departmental or direct IM.

      Bonus points: You can refer back to the conversation after lunch to see if you remember the details correctly without having to ask again.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re:Productivity! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The length of time I go without talking to a co-worker is directly proportional to my productivity.

      That is a highly job dependent statement. If you're doing a braindead task more suited to automation then yes talking to someone else will lower your productivity.
      If you're doing an incident investigation, or solving a multi-discipline problem then without talking to someone you're doing it the least productive way.

    8. Re:Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think part of that is because the senior management and C-Level people tend to come from the sales side.

    9. Re:Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not always the case. Sometimes you actually need to sit down an read / review things at your own pace an digest it.

      Can you really comprehend it if I "read" you a spreadsheet or other data set. Most often talking is good for definitive answers where the person you are talking to spent some time ALONE. If people just talked to each other all day then what would they be talking about? Someone has to sit down and *do* something so there is something to talk about.

      Do you not want to look at some of the backup that created "recommendation XYZ" that Bob told you. Now, if you are a CEO / President of the USA, then maybe you just have to trust your top advisors and you literally spend all day just talking. But beyond that - even second tier people like CFO, COO should be spending significant portions of their time NOT talking.

    10. Re: Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That works both ways. If I can be fired at any time and they let me know that they have no problem doing it at will, I will spend as much time learning for myself and goofing off as I can get away with because good work is not a guarantee for staying employed.

      Personally I'm a middle of the road guy since my immediate bosses are making sense and the company has shown that it does invest in people that do good work (like promotions, a training budget, retirement plan matching etc.). I'm somewhere where you can't just fire at will either. But I've also seen that jobs get moved around between various offices seemingly at will and I'm not keen on moving to some of those places.

    11. Re:Productivity! by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      It's a shadow metric for % of female workers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have assumed that your project is worth interrupting others from their work. To you, it always is because you do not pay the cost of that interruption.

      To the recipient, it might not be. And you've almost certainly underestimated the cost of that interruption to them.

    13. Re:Productivity! by wafflemonger · · Score: 1

      Take a quick look at the picture on the Daily Telegraph article. In that office, you get to be part of your neighbor's team when they are collaborating on their project. If they are working on a different project, you get to be a part of all their discussions. If management decides that productivity is suffering, they generally conclude that it has to be because communication is not as efficient as it should be. See those barriers between monitors? Poof, they go away. You get to watch someone move around right in your field of vision all day. And hear everything they say.
      Take a look at Peopleware by Tom DeMarco and Timothy Lister. Specifically chapters 8, 9 and 10. They discuss interruptions and office environment. They discuss the work environment and how most of the time software people work by themselves or with one or two other people. If those people are identified and given their own space, they are able to work on the big project and get it done with a minimum of interruptions and defects. Like you said, you go over to them, but they are right next to you and there should be some sort of noise barrier between you and the next team over so they are not interrupted by your collaboration. Before you say "headphones", chapter 12 references a study that shows that listening to music while programming can keep you from seeing patterns that would make your work more efficient.

    14. Re:Productivity! by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      I know first hand someone who just got performance-review pressured to leave their job because they weren't playing ping pong enough. This marketing/web company has a ping pong table in the middle of the office and apparently only non-team players avoid using it during working hours.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to begin picking up the pieces of my exploded cranium.

      --
      I come here for the love
    15. Re: Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats funny...I would say the exact opposite. The US system is built upon ruthless exploitation. It always has been
      No strong labour movement, no strong worker protections, no legislative basis for vacations etc, you're disposed of at a whim with little to no recourse, abysmal work/life balance. All the while the US worker is one of the least productive in the developed world.
      I think it's because the whole slavery thing is built into the nations DNA. They can't actually throw them in irons these days, but there's no doubt where all the power lies.
      It's funny how those countries you mentioned all provide higher standards of living than the US, with healthier, wealthier and happier people, while also being more productive.
      It's one of the reasons why I've refused numerous job offers to work in the US. I holiday there, but wouldn't want to work or live there. I am not a slave.

    16. Re:Productivity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes you actually need to sit down an read / review things at your own pace an digest it.

      I absolutely hate being pressed for an answer in a meeting when someone dumps a book full of data on me and expects that I will either digest it in the 30 seconds they flashed it on the screen in their poorly made powerpoint or just take their word for it.

    17. Re:Productivity! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      The length of time I go without talking to a co-worker is directly proportional to my productivity.

      That is a highly job dependent statement. If you're doing a braindead task more suited to automation then yes talking to someone else will lower your productivity.
      If you're doing an incident investigation, or solving a multi-discipline problem then without talking to someone you're doing it the least productive way.

      That why I referred to myself and not anyone else with their talk-all-the-time jobs.

      If I do my job right, there won't be incidents to investigate. So the incident investigators can keep going to their incident investigation meetings, while I keep on designing secure circuits in your chips.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    18. Re:Productivity! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you actually need to sit down an read / review things at your own pace an digest it.

      I absolutely hate being pressed for an answer in a meeting when someone dumps a book full of data on me and expects that I will either digest it in the 30 seconds they flashed it on the screen in their poorly made powerpoint or just take their word for it.

      So say that in the meeting. Don't you have a backbone?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  6. Which is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about tracking people and making them more "efficient", or tracking for making the machines, such as smart office or home more efficient? Going forward towards the glorious time of AI at every workplace and home, perhaps the efforts should be focused on the machines and try to create a more creative and ultimately productive workplace where the productivity gains are implemented with the machines by default.

  7. Remote workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even more reason to work from home (remotely)

    1. Re:Remote workers by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Even more reason to work from home (remotely)

      As if they cannot figure out how much you are actually on line at home.... Company laptop anyone?

      Personally, I DON'T want to work from home. I'd get nothing done. I'm more productive in my office free from the munchkins distractions.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Remote workers by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I'm self employed and work from my home office.

      I set my own hours and basically do whatever I want so long as the clients are happy.

      Generally my week days goes like so:
      - 7:00am get up, shower, get myself ready
      - 7:45am get the kids up, check sons blood-glucose, administer meal time insulin, feed kids breakfast, get them ready for school
      - 8:40am take the kids to school
      - 9:00am sit down at my desk, work or play on computer (depending on workload and mood)
      - 11:30am go pick up my daughter, check my sons blood-glucose and administer lunch time insulin
      - 12:00 noon lunch for myself and my daughter, my son stays at school
      - 1:00pm-ish get back to my desk, my daughter will possibly bother me all afternoon. Some days she leaves me alone
      - 3:30pm pick up my son from school, begin planning supper
      - 5:00pm-6:00pm cook supper, check sons blood glucose, administer meal time insulin, feed kids
      - 8:00pm check sons blood-glucose, administer basal insulin, bedtime for both kids
      - 8:30pm after kids finally in bed, sleeping, go back to office and work some more, sometimes I'll sit in the living room and put on Netflix in the background and use the laptop to casually work on something, or muck about on the web.
      - 2:00am-4:00am go to bed

      My wife's work schedule is all over the place, but she's in there too depending if she works or not, or what shift she's stuck with. If she's home during the day I'll spend time with her in the morning instead of work if I can get away with it. I'll forward my office phone to my cell if we leave the house.

      Weekends are a free for all. I'll squeeze in some work if it needs to get done.

  8. Put a space heater next to the sensor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should take care of the problem.

    1. Re:Put a space heater next to the sensor by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Space heaters are strictly verboten where I work.

      I'm thinking a well placed piece of tape or two would do the trick. Use the metal duct tape..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Put a space heater next to the sensor by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I know the fire codes in my city specifically ban space heaters in office buildings.

      But everyone does it anyhow, because the building management keeps the the place ice cold. (I mean, except in the summer when the AC is "oh sorry it is 95 degrees indoors")

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Put a space heater next to the sensor by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A little christmas tinsel and move it into an airstream. So their is constant motion.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. Never. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Informative

    Barring absolutely needing the job not to be on the street, I would not work at such a place.

    This sort of thing will get to the point where even the rabid anti-union types will be rethinking that opinion, and maybe companies who would like to remain union-free should think about such things.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      or maybe they should just keep going on as such and instead of the lame half-measure of unionization we could have more like a revolution

    2. Re:Never. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Barring absolutely needing the job not to be on the street, I would not work at such a place.

      And How! I had three separate offices, and was in constant movement. I even wonder how many employees this could even be useful for. No way I would work for these tools both in a job that required being tethered to a desk, and distrusted that much.

      This sort of thing will get to the point where even the rabid anti-union types will be rethinking that opinion, and maybe companies who would like to remain union-free should think about such things.

      Here's a 2014 report on a company that tried to limit employee bathroom use to 6 minutes per day. http://abcnews.go.com/Business...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Never. by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Nobody is forcing you to work anywhere at all. Also nobody owes you a job at all or a job that you would enjoy. There is 0 chance I would be pro union even if after losing everything I would have to live in the wild or on the streets. This is a matter of principle.

    4. Re:Never. by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Barring absolutely needing the job not to be on the street, I would not work at such a place.

      Not that I disagree, but I think I'd wait until they said something about physical attendance being part of my evaluation then you have two choices...

      1. Stop working from your desk as much as possible and Start shopping your Resume and get a better job (my recommendation) or...

      2. "Play" the attendance game by being there but do nothing until they start complaining, THEN, start shopping your resume...

      Either way, mess with their data collection statistics in a way that helps the poor slobs you leave behind.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Never. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Here's a 2014 report on a company that tried to limit employee bathroom use to 6 minutes per day. http://abcnews.go.com/Business...

      I'd really be pissed about that!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Never. by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      They did the deployment incorrectly.

      First, you give the boxes to the execs and the managers. When the union figures out that they're not getting heat or air conditioning when managers are out of the office, then you give those boxes to union leaders and your favorite employees. When the rest of the employees figure out that they've been excluded, even the most paranoid among them will be demanding their own box at their desk.

    7. Re:Never. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      Barring absolutely needing the job not to be on the street, I would not work at such a place.

      This sort of thing will get to the point where even the rabid anti-union types will be rethinking that opinion, and maybe companies who would like to remain union-free should think about such things.

      Or, maybe instead of putting money into a union they could put money into buying stock in the company and handle it that way.

      It's interesting. We have two grocery stores that are prevalent in this area: Kroger and Publix. Kroger is a large public company that has a unionized workforce. Publix is employee-owned - the only way to buy stock is to be an employee and if you sell your stock Publix has the right of first refusal (and they always buy it). Do I have to tell you 1) which store treats its employees far better and 2) which store is far better to shop at? Hint: same answer to both questions, starts with "P".

      I have no problem with unions as a concept, but employee-ownership is a much, much better way to go about it. I know it's not always possible but where it is possible it's a great idea.

    8. Re:Never. by Kabukiwookie · · Score: 2

      Here's a 2014 report on a company that tried to limit employee bathroom use to 6 minutes per day. http://abcnews.go.com/Business...

      Six whole minutes is quite luxurious, we have two minutes a day to empty our catheter bags and we get are only allowed to buy the official company issues bags from the company store at special discount employee rates.

      --
      The mountains of madness have many little plateaus of sanity - Terry Pratchett.
    9. Re:Never. by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      And what if it is just what is just as it says. A way to save energy.
      Optimizing the workspace is not a bad thing. Done right, it is win/win : more comfort for the employee, more productivity for the company.

      You are probably thinking about the boss monitoring every movement of his employees in order to punish them later if they take too many breaks. Truth is : the boss doesn't give a shit. In fact, the ideal employee is one you assign a task and forget about him until he gets back to you with the work done.
      As an example, I know sysadmins who know exactly what people do on the internet. They know some people spend hours on the internet not working. Their boss know it too, they don't care as long as the work is done and that this activity doesn't endanger the network in some way.
      In my own work, I happily go on non-work related sites all the time, with my own session. And yes, they are watching, and I never had any problem. Only once I visited a site that was considered a security threat and they got back at me asking me if I did it willingly, I said yes, explained why, and it stayed there. It wasn't a very good reason but at least, they knew it wasn't malware or an intrusion and it is all they needed to know.

    10. Re: Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pray tell, what those principles might be? It's attitudes like yours that got us Trump. I believe in this, CUZ.

    11. Re: Never. by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      Because unions are COMMUNISM, and that's UN-AMERICAN!

    12. Re:Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you have a Webb's wonder today.

    13. Re:Never. by YukariHirai · · Score: 2

      You are probably thinking about the boss monitoring every movement of his employees in order to punish them later if they take too many breaks. Truth is : the boss doesn't give a shit.

      A good boss doesn't give a shit. A bad boss is under the mistaken impression that employees must be going full throttle 100% of the time and tries to find ways to enforce that.

    14. Re:Never. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      For every company like that there is a Dave (not his real name).

      Whenever he drank, he had a bizarre rap: 'Always shit at work, last year I got paid $15k for shiting. I'm always holding it on the drive to work. I punch the clock and head for the head, every day.'

      You knew he was getting drunk when he started those lines on whatever girl he was chasing/annoying that day.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Never. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Tape a little christmas tinsel so it hangs in front of all the data collectors accessible. Every One.

      Then find a new job, as soon as you're off probation, hire away the key people. Especially if recruitment bonus' are available.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:Never. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Here's a 2014 report on a company that tried to limit employee bathroom use to 6 minutes per day. http://abcnews.go.com/Business...

      I'd really be pissed about that!

      Gotta be a lotta prolapses in that place.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:Never. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Here's a 2014 report on a company that tried to limit employee bathroom use to 6 minutes per day. http://abcnews.go.com/Business...

      Six whole minutes is quite luxurious, we have two minutes a day to empty our catheter bags and we get are only allowed to buy the official company issues bags from the company store at special discount employee rates.

      shudder....

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:Never. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      For every company like that there is a Dave (not his real name).

      Whenever he drank, he had a bizarre rap: 'Always shit at work, last year I got paid $15k for shiting. I'm always holding it on the drive to work. I punch the clock and head for the head, every day.'

      You knew he was getting drunk when he started those lines on whatever girl he was chasing/annoying that day.

      Hehe, reminds me of the old poem.....

      "My boss gets paid a dollar,

      I get paid a dime.

      That's why I shit,

      On company time.

      I've always had a different approach - and yes, it has pissed some people off.

      Someone who is pulling some stunt gets told personally, not punish the entire crew.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for Cisco Systems for nearly ten years. I could convert all of my capital to Cisco stock and not even touch a tenth of a percent.

      Meanwhile, a single executive at Cisco could issue a decree that all offices require a $100,000 to $250,000 conferencing solution (out of their own budgets), and it would be nearly impossible to fight. Think I'm wrong? Check out any Cisco office's teleconference room.

    20. Re:Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha - don't got the bathroom, take a dump in the boss's desk drawer ;-)

    21. Re:Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to say no.

      I think it won't end; people are going to have to play this game, and I wouldn't be surprised if, pushed far enough, this could be a first step in people automating themselves; implants, neural stimulation, that kind of thing. Turn your brain on for work mode, then shut it off to play.

      Far-fetched, yeah. But... if companies push workers who can't be automated hard enough, why wouldn't this happen?

    22. Re: Never. by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      No, my dear A. Coward, those principles are non-initiation of violence by the collective against an individual for the monetary advantage of the collective under any circumstances, so basically I am against slavery.

    23. Re: Never. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow......you're retarded.

      They finally did it. They got their slaves to love their chains.

      They've won.

    24. Re: Never. by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Nobody put me into chains and I am not interested in putting anybody into chains either, AFAIC the non-collectivism and non-initiation of violence by the collective against an individual is a winning principle.

    25. Re:Never. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Ha - don't got the bathroom, take a dump in the boss's desk drawer ;-)

      Sounds legit, as long as i have a good charge number

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re:Never. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I worked for Cisco Systems for nearly ten years. I could convert all of my capital to Cisco stock and not even touch a tenth of a percent.

      Meanwhile, a single executive at Cisco could issue a decree that all offices require a $100,000 to $250,000 conferencing solution (out of their own budgets), and it would be nearly impossible to fight. Think I'm wrong? Check out any Cisco office's teleconference room.

      Yes, I understand - you have to have widespread buy in to get anywhere. A lot of companies give huge stock incentives to executives, also, furthering the divide.

      Publix has been that way likely from the start. I probably don't have to tell you which store treats its employees far better, right? Hint: not the unionized store.

      One of the cool things about employee ownership is that everybody is on the same team again, rather than having the "workers vs. management" mentality.

  10. I'll be curious of the time lag by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Meaning the amount of time between when my admin hears about this and when she casually asks what it would take to install and monitor the devices on all the staff desks.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  11. Unattended workstation is an endangered species. by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    There is going to come a point in the not-far-off-future where most consumer facing gear wont even run unless a user is actively present, has ID'd them self through social media and is operating it. See Oculus Rift for an example. It wont run if the sensor says it not on my head. Now i understand in most use-cases thats fine, but sometimes i want a game to play out, even if im not attending it right then. I should have the option of taking off the HMD without it pausing everything.

    --
    Good-bye
  12. Do they know when you fart? by Gorilla_Man · · Score: 1

    Please somebody let me know if they report when you fart.

    1. Re:Do they know when you fart? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Please somebody let me know if they report when you fart.

      http://abcnews.go.com/Business...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Do they know when you fart? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      They don't really need sensors for that!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Do they know when you fart? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to clock out if you just take a dump directly on your manager's desk. You can call it a "productivity meeting".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Do they know when you fart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's just insulting to the caca.

    5. Re: Do they know when you fart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a moon...

  13. Management doesn't know what it wants by H3lldr0p · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Proponents claim the goal is efficiency

    Yes, but what kind of efficiency? You're making a ton of assumptions that being at a desk, in a meeting room, or elsewhere leads to work being done, which leads eventually to profit. Work rarely is so attached to anything of the like that attempting to measure an individual's output for anything other than CO2 production is a waste of time, money, and thought.

    Work, as we all know it, has been as industrialized as it possibly can be. And not everything that could be put into some sort of process needs it. Part of work is knowing where things can lead, it's following your instincts since you're supposed to be familiar with what you're doing.

    And then there's the whole being valued by what work you do. That whole thing where your personal worth and wealth is directly tied to how "good" you're viewed as. Wealth as a virtue signaling! How sickening is that? How messed up as a society to you have to become to think that way?

    Fight this sort of bullshit. Fight it hard.

    1. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And then there's the whole being valued by what work you do. That whole thing where your personal worth and wealth is directly tied to how "good" you're viewed as. Wealth as a virtue signaling! How sickening is that? How messed up as a society to you have to become to think that way?

      Fight this sort of bullshit. Fight it hard.

      I just don't know how many occupations there are that the normal job state is being in one place the entire day. Sounds horrifying.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2

      I just don't know how many occupations there are that the normal job state is being in one place the entire day. Sounds horrifying.

      Those that are quite horrifying. I'm thinking call center jobs or any such service level position. Ones where you are not measured by how well you resolve the customer's issue but how many calls you get through and how quickly you do it.

      These are jobs which devalue and degrade you fast if you don't buy into their antisocial focus. There are reasons these jobs have been packaged up and forced into contracted companies. It changes their nature. Your job is no longer to assist the people calling, as they aren't your customers. Your customer is the company paying you to get through as many calls as possible. That's messed up.

    3. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "How messed up as a society to you have to become to think that way?"
      It goes back to the Time and motion study https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Later ideas about "Motivating Employees"
      http://guides.wsj.com/manageme...
      Computer monitoring system grew from early email and internet use around the USA.
      e.g. daily reports of every keystroke per computer, clickstream data https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      The why is often given as "trade secrets", i.e. the idea that monitoring everyone stops a walk out?
      Other ideas surround legal issues. The lack of monitoring allowed bad thing to go on and not be stopped.
      If training is expensive, tracking all workers can show if extra help is needed.
      Background checks often fail or are done at a low cost...
      The Fourth Amendment, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, State laws might offer some protection from an invasion of privacy. i.e. company computer, company network, no reasonable expectation of privacy for clickstream data.
      Most of that was tested in courts the 1990's.
      The tracking of workers would show a return to the Time and motion study decades.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I just don't know how many occupations there are that the normal job state is being in one place the entire day. Sounds horrifying.

      My wife and I both work from home, so that's normal to us. She works for a company that processes medicare claims (she's in QA) so she's in constant contact with her coworkers throughout the day via instant messaging, email, and phone, while I often talk to clients on the phone. It gets kind of difficult, but we often take off after work and walk around town (we live in a tourist trap) or even just the mall. She gets cabin fever pretty bad and just needs to get out. I am an outdoorsy type so I go to the park or whatever, too.

      But, yeah, you have to get a little variety.

    5. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never attribute to incompetence that which can easily be explained by malice.

      The terrible atmosphere this creates? It's the goal. Not the profit but the discomfort. Think back to every petty tyrant you've had to deal with; from your school days to the manager at mcdonalds that you'd overhear for ten minutes while eating, to half the supervisors and bosses I've ever met in an office setting.

      Everyone understands that those things don't *really* help your productivity. But they make you miserable, AND serve as an excuse for whatever they want to do next since the numbers can be interpreted in any way they wish so as to explain why *YOU* are a bad employee. The more miserable each and every one of us is, the *happier* middle management gets.

    6. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Kabukiwookie · · Score: 1

      Not only this, management who introduces this is usually piss-poor at performing themselves and are usually projecting their behaviour on others.

      KPIs are to managing people as what paint-by-number is to painting. Having something that resembles a picture after you fill up each marked space with the right colour, does not make you a painter.

      Either you're a good manager and you're able to not only get a productive team that is happy to do the work that's thrown at them, all the while keeping in touch with who is and who is not performing optimally, or you're a shitty manager, who needs to synergise his KPIs to leverage employee empowerment, in which case it's more efficient for the company as a whole if that person is assigned to cleaning toilets.

      --
      The mountains of madness have many little plateaus of sanity - Terry Pratchett.
    7. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can attest to this. Customer Service, especially at the "floor" level (cashiers in particular) suffer such soul-eroding conditions that it's not uncommon for them to lose all hope in humanity. A year or so of it will lead you to understand that the Death Star was *right*, Skynet was the hero, and that hell is too good a place for everyone inside your store.

      It's been 2 decades and I still can't immediately assume "beer thief" when I see a woman push a stroller of some kind. Because that's what they are. You can tell, because they have a baby in there. The baby's the key; because they'll put all the booze under it, and even asking them to lift it so the camera can better see what brand of bottle was sticking out from under it will have her go all "YOU'RE THREATENING MY BABY I'M CALLING THE COPS".

      These are the people being paid half a living wage to get held up bi-weekly, screamed at every other hour, chewed up and bitched out for absolutely no reason once a week, told in exacting detail why they're worthless and will always be worthless like all those other people just like them that "stand there and twiddle your thumbs for nothing while getting paid" at least three times a month, propositioned once a night by an old hag with no teeth and more STDs than an entire city's free clinics, and somehow, somehow still held to be at fault for not calling the ambulance fast enough when someone chokes on an unopened slimjim they tried to sneak out with.

    8. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Those that are quite horrifying. I'm thinking call center jobs or any such service level position. Ones where you are not measured by how well you resolve the customer's issue but how many calls you get through and how quickly you do it.

      These are jobs which devalue and degrade you fast if you don't buy into their antisocial focus.

      Jeebuz. I've been pretty lucky in that I had to be all over the place. With my low threshold for boredom I probably would become suicidal pretty quickly in that sort of job.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Those that are quite horrifying. I'm thinking call center jobs or any such service level position. Ones where you are not measured by how well you resolve the customer's issue but how many calls you get through and how quickly you do it.

      Yeah, exactly. And this is NOTHING new. A couple of decades I took a summer job in a collections department. It was a horrid job, but it paid reasonably well for a summer position. Our productivity was measured almost solely in the number of accounts we handled and the amount of money we brought in through collections. Whether we actually handled the accounts "well" wasn't really a factor (which led to gross inefficiencies and hoards of "problem accounts" that simply went more and more delinquent as they were passed off because nobody wanted to take the time to deal with them). I managed to figure out ways to make my own account handling more efficient, so I actually processed significantly more accounts than anyone else in the office.

      Anyhow, after I had been there for a couple months, they decided we still weren't "efficient" enough and they weren't tracking us enough. (We spent more time filing in stupid useless spreadsheets tracking all the calls we did so that someone in management could monitor our "productivity" than we frequently did making calls.)

      And so they instituted a policy that we had to "log in" to our phones while we were at our desks, and log out whenever we were on break or at lunch or whatever.

      About two weeks after this policy started, one day I ended up skipping lunch because I was dealing with a particularly problematic account. But then I took a longer afternoon break to make up for it and was out for 18 or 19 minutes instead of 10 minutes -- I figured this wouldn't be a problem, since I had given up my 30-minute lunch break and effectively worked "for free" for 20 extra minutes that day.

      The next day, I get called over to my boss's desk, where she had been instructed by company-wide memo to reprimand me, because my name ended up at the top of some list of people who took extra-long breaks. My boss was apologetic, since she knew I was more productive than anyone else in the department, but this is what management were wasting their time doing by sorting some spreadsheet column or whatever and looking only at how long somebody was out for a single break.

      Anyhow, with only a few weeks in the summer left, I simply said, "Sorry, these are unacceptable working conditions -- I'll pack up my things and leave," and simply left the job on the spot. (There had been other similar crap leading up to this too.) Only time in my life that I did that, but I think it was entirely justified. Last I heard, the entire collections division ended up shut down and outsourced a few months later, probably because workers were spending twice as much time filling out spreadsheets and logging into phones to prove how "productive" they were rather than actually doing work. Idiots.

    10. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Falos · · Score: 1

      We love making retarded assumptions. Most metrics are. We don't have time to actually deduce the value of a system or person or purchase, just give us a number thanks, preferably one that software can automatically rank and color code for me.

      Imagine if "time spent in seat" was the single performance indicator used, everything else purely ignored. Imagine how hilariously gamed it would become. Imagine how much actual efficiency/productivity/results/w.e would be lost, not gained.

      Now stop imagining because reality is only a few inches over.

    11. Re:Management doesn't know what it wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the management at that call center were idiots. I run a collection department for a smaller institution and would never treat my employees like this.

      I set delinquency goals for my staff, give incentives when they hit goals, and then get out of their way. Number of phone calls in a day is meaningless unless you are also looking at what they do when they make contact. If their goal is to get that person off the phone in 2 minutes or less, you will get employees that work to get the customer gone as quick as possible regardless if a solution to the problem was found. My attitude is to treat the call where a person answers as if it will be the only time you get to talk to that person (in many cases it is). Take as much time as you need to resolve the issue, and don't worry about time on call. This has resulted in employees that go for long term solutions rather than just trying to collect one payment. The overall health of the loan portfolio is at all time low delinquency numbers, largely due to my employees treating the customer as people and not just a number.

      I also have been able to give them control over their accounts from the day of the first delinquency all the way through charge-off. That way they take ownership of the account. The only problem I sometimes have is an employee being too territorial about "their" accounts. If I have a problem person that isn't making goal, I address that individual situation and don't make policy based on one person's behavior. There are times when getting up and talking to a co-worker about a situation or just venting about a tough call will make that employee more productive in the long run.

      At the end of the day, treat employees with respect, set clear goals and don't work them to the bone. Realize that management tools are just that, tools. You can use a tool the right way or the wrong way. Unfortunately it takes more work as a manager to do things right, and some managers are just too lazy.

  14. locators are a feature where I work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I work there are locator beacons that allow you to be located by co-workers so you don't have to stay at your desk. The app on the phone allows me to turn it on and off (like a chat app) and it will lead me to my meeting even if I don't know where the room is.

    1. Re:locators are a feature where I work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you are only months away, at best, from being replaced by a robot

    2. Re:locators are a feature where I work by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      sounds like you are only months away, at best, from being replaced by a robot

      He has been replaced by the robot - that was the robot speaking!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  15. The company lied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's not for energy use at all. Individual cubicles or offices for that matter, are not heated or cooled singularly. They are part of a zone. Me not being in my office has absolutely no bearing on heating the other 5 offices in the same HVAC zone.

    Same for the 20 cubicles on the floor. It makes no difference if 1 person is in the office or all 20.

    If they want to reduce heating/cooling expense, install a fucking motion sensor or do what every other company has done and put the fucking system on a timer. God forbid you're in my office after hours during the summer the cooling system will allow the entire building to heat up to 80F and you can't do anything about it.

    1. Re:The company lied by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Enlighted is a motion sensor (and more). It is creepy.

      It can be used to optimize energy performance-- if the office is lightly occupied, increase the comfort bands as your percentage of people dissatisfied is less influenced by that space. That can be used to reduce airflow, re-heat, or cooling depending on the system type. It can also reduce light levels of course.

      They see real-estate as a big-data wet dream. Personally, I don't get it; while you can save money you quickly get to a point of diminishing returns. While you can track people, do you really know what all that data actually means! Ok, Joe has a small bladder; we should make the soda machine jam on him (and only him) so he doesn't pee so much... or at least we can recover some of the money... The (substantial) money is much better spent elsewhere.

  16. If we only had more unions BS like this would not by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we only had more unions BS like this would not even make it to the install part unless there is a big list of things needed to fire someone / rules in place to make so that the boss needs to show that to use this to fire some takes a lot of paper work.

    It's like alot of the BS metrics that just end up making people cheat the system / hurt things in areas that are not tacked.

  17. Why I Only Work Remotely by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This article sums up a lot of the problems I had with the office: https://shift.newco.co/why-i-o...

    This issue in particular:

    ROWE (results only work environment) is a fantastic framework that needs to be adopted in places employing knowledge workers. You should be measuring the output of your workers, not the amount of time you can see them sitting in your office. I refuse to work in a place with such a cynical view of their employees. If you really think your employees will not be working if you cannot look over their shoulder to check, you have the wrong way of looking at the relationship with your employees (especially at a startup). You should be hiring people who are engaged by their work and believe in the company’s mission. If people slack off when you aren’t watching them, your company has a disease, and you have discovered a symptom. You cannot treat this symptom and expect the disease to be cured. More on this later (Remove the safety nets and let the bad actors fail).

    If you are looking at your employees through the lens of “I can’t give these people freedom and autonomy to do work in the best way they see fit:” You should consider finding different people for your organization instead of pursuing an authoritarian regime.

    1. Re:Why I Only Work Remotely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know of at least one manager that not only regularly uses screen monitoring software but intends to require employees to install web cams in their home office to ensure "butt in seat" compliance of remote employees.

      Working remotely is no guarantee of no management stupidity.

    2. Re:Why I Only Work Remotely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're suggesting that people who need a little adult supervision to be productive are actually garbage employees who don't deserve a job? Maybe just because you work best in a particular mode doesn't mean that that mode is best for everyone.

    3. Re:Why I Only Work Remotely by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Then someone will get the idea that they need work metrics. I was told at one performance review that I didn't have as many checkins as my colleagues.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  18. I Spy Something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aluminum foil makes a great Faraday cage. A camera under a desk sounds pervy.

  19. Re:Unattended workstation is an endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck are you smoking?

  20. The problem isn't efficiency, it's privacy by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    Until we're all replaced by robots anyway, we require a certain amount of autonomy, freedom, or 'slack'.

    Apparently that's going to need to be codified in law before we can accept all these monitoring devices watching us 24/7, because we don't trust the people who own the systems... and experience shows we are right not to trust them.

    Knowing which areas need heat, which doors see the most traffic, whether a meeting room is wasted space or not, or even how many times a day the toilets are flushed - each of those things provides useful information for something other than tracking the minutia of an individual's day so you can go 'Big Brother' on them in an attempt to squeeze out a little more productivity at the expense of morale.

  21. Not everyone by mi · · Score: 1

    Everyone wants to micromanage everyone else all in the name of safety/efficiency/feelings etc.

    My employer, for example, encourages people to work from home. The new office, for example, has very few permanently-assigned desks — and there are only 3 cubicles for every 5 employees. It is expected, that, on average, two out of five (40%) people will be working from home on any given day.

    There is no presence-monitoring hardware mandated for home offices and the company-issued laptops don't run any such software either (yes, I know for sure).

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  22. LOL cubicle-level HVAC by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The company insisted the boxes were intended to reduce energy costs, ensuring that empty cubicles weren't overheated or over-air-conditioned

    What a load of bullshit. A cubicle by its very nature is a division of a larger room. It has no ceiling to hold heat in or meaningful insulation, and it's certainly not climate controlled on an individual level.

    A more believable excuse would be that the device shut down the computer and desk lights when the employee was not in to save energy, but most businesses leave machines on to facilitate after-hours backups/maintenance and with modern high-efficiency lighting, there would be no net cost benefit to controlling lighting with them.

    1. Re:LOL cubicle-level HVAC by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      A cubicle by its very nature is a division of a larger room. It has no ceiling to hold heat in or meaningful insulation, and it's certainly not climate controlled on an individual level.

      I see you've never worked on a multi-zoned HVAC system before. Even if all zones are in the same room there's a very big difference to gained by controlling them individually even if the AC part isn't running. Sometimes airflow alone is a key part and a well designed system can narrow down the HVAC to a few employees.

      I am also in an open plan office. One big office with a foyer so even the three levels are open to each other for airflow. There are 60 thermostats in our building JUST in the open area.

    2. Re:LOL cubicle-level HVAC by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      The company insisted the boxes were intended to reduce energy costs, ensuring that empty cubicles weren't overheated or over-air-conditioned

      What a load of bullshit. A cubicle by its very nature is a division of a larger room.

      It *is* possible that it looks at all the cubicles in a room to decide if the lights and a/c can be turned off or reduced. But if that were *really* the issue don't you think they would have told folks before sticking a black box under their desk?

      The reason it sounds like they're doing something wrong is that they acted like they were doing something wrong when they quietly installed these things while nobody was around.

    3. Re:LOL cubicle-level HVAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more believable excuse would be that the device shut down the computer and desk lights when the employee was not in to save energy,

      Work in IT.

      When the managers are all in a meeting somewhere and certain 'active' persons are on vacation the lights will go out. In the middle of the day. With almost full staff in every cubicle.

  23. Wait, what? by leadfoot · · Score: 1

    Wow, the onion is getting real good at anonymizing their articles now.

    --
    "We're gonna need a bigger boat"
    1. Re:Wait, what? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It's been months since I could tell an Onion article from the headline.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  24. Re:If we only had more unions BS like this would n by Arkham · · Score: 1

    If we only had more unions BS like this would not even make it to the install part unless there is a big list of things needed to fire someone / rules in place to make so that the boss needs to show that to use this to fire some takes a lot of paper work.

    It's like alot of the BS metrics that just end up making people cheat the system / hurt things in areas that are not tacked.

    Unions seem like a good idea for unskilled work, but not for technology workers. I am not interested in any sort of collective bargaining. If I have a device at my desk or software on my laptop that I find onerous, I can (a)disable/delete/destroy it or (b) go work somewhere else. The good thing about software development is that for every programmer worth his salt there are 100 jobs waiting.

    --
    - Vincit qui patitur.
  25. Too dumb to use keystroke monitors? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Seriously. If they wanted to know if somebody is at their workstation, just download some software from the Interwebs and install it on the computers used by employees.

    You'll get a report on when employees are at their desks and, as a bonus, you can see what they're doing, where they're surfing and who they're talking to.

    1. Re:Too dumb to use keystroke monitors? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Seriously. If they wanted to know if somebody is at their workstation, just download some software from the Interwebs and install it on the computers used by employees.

      You'll get a report on when employees are at their desks and, as a bonus, you can see what they're doing, where they're surfing and who they're talking to.

      Can it tell when I'm writing in my notebook? I spend more time doing that than typing code or documents.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:Too dumb to use keystroke monitors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My employer already MITMs all HTTPS connections. Doesn't yours?

  26. Re:If we only had more unions BS like this would n by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    With your union you are counting your lines of code and trading your h1b replacement.

  27. A good manager should know when there's a problem. by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Years ago I developed an early mobile computer app (on palm pilots) for use in field work (exotic vegetation control, mosquito control, that kind of thing). And the supervisors would often warn me that the workers were unhappy and hostile toward the idea of a new system.

    So I'd take the field guys aside and talk over their concerns. Inevitably the question would come up whether their supervisors would be tracking their movements all through day. I'd assure them that no, the system couldn't tell if you stopped to grab a cup of coffee or take a whiz, but I warned them that it would give management a very precise assessment of how much work each individual worker actually accomplished.

    And here's the thing: everyone was OK with that. They didn't mind being evaluated on accomplishment, they just didn't want to be treated like children or judged by some bullshit metric.

    As a manager you need data, but you shouldn't have a bias toward easily obtained data. Someone who is on top of his employees' performance doesn't need an ass-in-chair time tracker, unless an employee's actual function is simply to sit on a chair.

    If you're really doing your job as boss, the people who report to you won't be worried about being tracked. They'll worry about doing a good job. Because when they do a good job, you notice, and when they do a bad job, you notice... and promptly. Nobody is going to think you're judging them on bathroom breaks.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  28. Re:Unattended workstation is an endangered species by bluescrn · · Score: 1

    The Rift headset contains a light sensor to detect if the headset is being worn. So it can power down the screen and/or pause software when you remove the headset. If you want to keep it running (useful as a developer), it's easily covered with a finger, or I guess you could put tape over it...

    (The real annoyance with the Rift is the health+safety warning. Has anyone come up with a hack to disable that yet?)

  29. OccupEye by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    No no, they got the wrong idea. These OccupEye units just designed for upskirt pictures.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  30. Re:If we only had more unions BS like this would n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I doubt unions would be particularly able to disable some level of employee tracking. For example, using ID badges for access control is a form of tracking that is difficult to protest, because it's actually useful. Same thing with using motion sensors in rooms to control lighting/ventilation/heating load. If I dim or turn off the lights, and reduce the heat load, I can use less cooling in that zone. Not to mention that I can put some outlets (If the system is designed with this in mind) into a list to be turned off (Say, monitors, desk top outlets for things like fans/heaters/scanners), while leaving others like computers, printers, fax machines, fridges, and coffee pots on. I can also say "OK, this zone is unoccupied. If there's a power issue, I can let the UPS's shut it down without connecting it to the backup generator" All of these are examples of real world reasons to have these features. If one also uses the NFC/RFID chips in the id badge be used as a username (Not a password, or as a secondary one) for the computers, you can have improved security, by making it easier for users to log in at arbitrary computers, as well as when they come back from lunch. You could also make it so that when they leave the cube it locks the computer for security reasons, and if you're working with medical data or other sensitive stuff, if any other badge comes in. You're tracking badges rather than people, and anyone could leave it behind. But all of these accomplish tracking, with actual useful results beyond that.

    Not to mention that most unions, like IBEW, UAW, or other working unions usually have their members working in places where you punch in and out. Educators are moving towards that too.

  31. Easy Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A handheld taser will render the unit inoperable quite quickly.

    Come to think of it: 50,000 volts of electricity pretty much renders the majority of electronics inoperable.

    Them: Your unit isn't reporting.
    Me: What unit? What report ?
    Them: Um. . . . never mind.

  32. A-fucking-men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barring absolutely needing the job not to be on the street, I would not work at such a place.

    This. A million times this.

  33. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Code in your underwear. They'll remove the webcam pretty quick.

    1. Re: Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or they'll start using the footage as another revenue stream.

      There's bound to be people on this planet that would pay to see a naked overweight neckbeard coding in his mom's basement...

  34. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An employee's actual function is simply to sit on a chair.

    A job I'm qualified for!

  35. Cool by dristoph · · Score: 0

    Cool nightmare dystopia capitalism is creating for us all. Insatiable desire for infinite growth combined with a competitive business environment and a disregard for the well-being of the workers in the trenches all but guarantees this kind of shit will become more and more common unless it is fiercely resisted in perpetuity. That or we need to radically reimagine how society functions.

  36. So why are they paying by pjv936 · · Score: 0

    the supervisors? Isn't it their job to keep an eye on the workers?

  37. Bean-Counter Mentality by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If the managers have no clue where their staff are most of the time, then you are running an org wrong. Even if the org uses cheesy gizmos to verify people are physically at their desks, that says almost nothing about actually doing work. And it's bad for morale.

    I can see using such for a problem employee who repeatedly abuses their time, but not as a default.

  38. Don't like it? by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Quit.

    This will inevitably become a problem for government use... we can't easily quit/vote with our wallets. This is private companies leveraging technology to increase the bottom line... you know, that activity that keeps most of us nerds employed?

    {cussy}Fucking outrage culture is getting outrageous.
    Dial it the fuck back a little and have some goddamned perspective. {/cussy}

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  39. Good post by hackwrench · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For whatever reason, apparently due to some quirk by some past Slashdot management, I never get mod points, so it seems to me that the best I can do is to comment that a post is good when I see an exceptionally good post, and yours is a good post. Likewise, I also point out when a post is bad and hint at why in a way that amuses me.

    1. Re:Good post by qvatch · · Score: 1

      I basically never comment, but have read daily for ages. I went nigh on five years without getting any mod points, but now I seem to get them frequently. Carry on.

    2. Re:Good post by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I actually much prefer positive comments over positive mod points anyway.

  40. Re: At will by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Indiana is a fire at will, quit at will state and employers discovered that employees will quit without a two-week or somesuch notice.

  41. Still doesn't measure productivity by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    When I worked at a Fortune 500 company, I actually witnessed some woman spend an entire day updating her stupid Franklin planner. A whole damn day. Showing up for work is not a valid method of determining compensation. One should get rewarded for results not for the amount of hours they're at their place of employment.

  42. Hah! Fooled them! by PPH · · Score: 1

    I left my pants in my cubicle.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Hah! Fooled them! by coofercat · · Score: 1

      I didn't realise these devices worked by smell ;-)

  43. Heard it said: There are 2 ways to run a company. by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Option one: You can run it like a kindergarden.

    Option two: You can run it like a university.

    Each has it own merits for management. But most of us would choose to be a worker in an option-two company.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  44. Empty cubicles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in their right mind would believe such bullshit? Air conditioning can only heat an entire room, not per cubicle.

  45. Just more government run amuck, that's all by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

    Hey Silicon Valley nerds: you do realize that California mandates exactly this sort of technology in your homes and offices, don't you? The 2013 and later building codes require occupancy sensors in all offices less than or equal to 250 sq. ft., as well as conference rooms, multi-purpose rooms and a whole host of other places. If you build a new home all garages, laundry rooms and utility rooms must have occupancy-sensor lighting. Feel free to be violated in the name of the environment, courtesy of your nanny state.

    1. Re:Just more government run amuck, that's all by coofercat · · Score: 1

      I'll accept the office thing, because they're usually hooked up to a building control system of some sort, and so can/will be saving out stats and whatnot. However, having a light in your garage that comes on when you walk in and turns off when you're not in there has zero surveillance potential.

  46. Trust and respect by jandersen · · Score: 1

    It is easy to criticise this sort of things as intruding on privacy, but I think it misses the mark. Seeing how people in general accept - and sometimes even ask for - more and more CCTV in the public spaces, I think it is clear that privacy isn't the main concern - it's about feeling that you are trusted and respected. Privacy is important in the sense that we all need to have a private space, where we can put our guards down and just be ourselves, but in general, in public and in our workplace, we want to feel that the basic assumtion is that we are honest and trustworthy.

  47. Re:A good manager should know when there's a probl by coofercat · · Score: 1

    > you shouldn't have a bias toward easily obtained data

    Nicely summed up. Management is hard, if you're not up to that challenge, then get out and let someone else have a crack at it. It seems though, as humans, having a nice graph to look at makes us feel like we have some control over something.

  48. correlation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do the sensors correlate when somebody is at their desk reading Slashdot?

  49. Re:Unattended workstation is an endangered species by cheetah_spottycat · · Score: 1

    The rift has OLED screens that will suffer from burn-in if you leave them on with a static image being shown. It is literally a screen saver, and has nothing to do with restricting the user.

  50. Free will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to work for such companies.
    Other alternatives are push back, persist till you're laid off and oh well!
    Sabotage and subversion are time honored responses to bad management practices.

    I remember one large player that tracked the number of mouse clicks.
    If you are away from your desk no mouse clicks.

  51. Re:Unattended workstation is an endangered species by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    I get all that, the point is once eye-tracking and such comes online, advertisers are going to demand that ads are confirmed to be watched by getting the eye tracking data. There will come a point where you wont be able to even look away from the ad or it will pause and wait for your attention.

    --
    Good-bye
  52. Re:If we only had more unions BS like this would n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly you have never worked in a union shop. On the railroad (in the US), black boxes watch union employees and monitor speed of driving the train, whether they are paying attention, how long they allow the train to sit idle, and many other metrics. Their every move is watched, and management is constantly looking for ways to monitor them more in order to weed out the least little inefficiency. All the union does is promise that a union worker will be at certain locations and perform certain tasks. The employment contract basically turns a worker as an automaton. As such, the company is trying to treat a human as closely to an automaton as possible.

  53. Re:Unattended workstation is an endangered species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to fix a projector that became a paperweight because it couldn't pass an iris check. I spent hours taking it apart to roll the cheap servo back and forth a couple times, loosen the cheap grease.

    I was fortunate to find an engine test button on a printer with no display, just the paper jam LED eternally lit. It ignores all the whiny sensor conditions and just fucking prints a test sheet. This let me actually diagnose the fucking situation, which was miles from any paper jam sensor.

    I don't own a Keurig but I got a good laugh at the device refusing to work until an "official lid" condition was met.

    I cut open past the user-accessible parts on a label printer because it wouldn't work (just rattle) unless I held in an irrelevant lever with my finger.

    Artificial rejection checks are bullshit.